REVIEW 2 cited by
A Note on the Time Complexity of Using Subdivision Methods for the Approximation of Fibers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Subdivision methods such as quadtrees, octrees, and higher-dimensional orthrees are standard practice in different domains of computer science. We can use these methods to represent given geometries, such as curves, meshes, or surfaces. This representation is achieved by splitting some bounding voxel recursively while further splitting only sub-voxels that intersect with the given geometry. It is fairly known that subdivision methods are more efficient than traversing a fine-grained voxel grid. In this short note, we propose another outlook on analyzing the construction time complexity of orthrees to represent implicitly defined geometries that are fibers (preimages) of some function. This complexity is indeed asymptotically better than traversing dense voxel grids, under certain conditions, which we specify in the note. In fact, the complexity is output sensitive, and is closely related to the Hausdorff measure and Hausdorff dimension of the resulting geometry.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Manifold-Guided Motion Planning for Tight Assemblies
A sampling-based planner that biases samples toward near-contact configurations solves previously unsolved tight assembly puzzles and is claimed to be probabilistically complete.
-
Lifelong Localization in Dynamic Indoor Environments Combining Odometry with Sparse Distance Sampling
A lifelong indoor localization framework fuses odometry with sparse distance sampling and provably retains a pose close to ground truth, provided the dynamic environment is correctly characterized.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.