Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Fluctuating interfaces in barotropic beta-plane turbulence

T0 review · 6 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the vorticity interfaces bounding zonal jets in barotropic beta-plane turbulence are rough, multifractal fluctuating contours with sub-Gaussian heights, fat-tailed speeds, and specific power-law spectra.

desk verdict Systematic, well-written statistics of jet-interface fluctuations in beta-plane turbulence, but the load-bearing tracking rule is only visually validated and the exponents lack error bars; worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23493 v1 pith:X7KZLABX submitted 2025-07-31 physics.flu-dyn nlin.PSphysics.ao-ph

Sandip Sahoo , Samriddhi Sankar Ray This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynnlin.PSphysics.ao-ph PACS 47.27.-i
keywords zonaljetsbeta-planeturbulencevorticityinterfacesinterfacetrackingmultifractalheightfieldstatisticsstructurefunctionszonostrophyparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a way to track the sharp interfaces between zonal jets in forced-dissipative barotropic $\beta$-plane turbulence by following the local maxima of the eastward zonal velocity, and then works out the statistical laws of those interfaces. It claims that the interfacial height fluctuations are sub-Gaussian, while the fluctuation speeds are fat-tailed, becoming more Gaussian as the zonostrophy parameter increases. It further claims that the time series of the mean and variance of the interfacial height have power-law spectra with exponents $f^{-2}$, and $f^{-5}$, $f^{-5/3}$, $f^{-7/2}$ respectively, and that the temporal height field is non-differentiable, with a short-time second-order structure exponent $\zeta_2 < 2$ that approaches 2 with increasing $R_\beta$. A multifractal analysis shows the interfaces have a broad singularity spectrum that narrows as $R_\beta$ grows. If these results hold, they give quantitative fluctuation laws for jet interfaces in planetary and oceanic flows.

What carries the argument

The central object is the tracked contour $C(x,t)$, defined operationally as the set of local maxima of the eastward zonal velocity when $u$ is plotted against $y$ at each fixed $x$, and then the height field $h(x,t)=C(x,t)-\bar{C}(x)$ measures its deviation from the time-averaged profile. This scalar height field carries the entire analysis: its probability density function, the speed $v_C = \lim_{\delta t \to 0} \delta h/\delta t$, sectorial mean $M_{h,s}$ and variance $V_{h,s}$ spectra, the second-order temporal structure function $S_2(\tau)$, and the partition-function multifractal spectrum built from $H=|h|+0.001$. The Rossby time $\tau_w = 1/(L_\epsilon \beta)$ normalizes time increments, and the zonostrophy parameter $R_\beta = L_{Rh}/L_\epsilon$ controls the strength and smoothness of the jets.

What would settle it

Extract interfaces from the same DNS with an independent definition, for example level sets of the vorticity field or ridges of $|\nabla \omega|$, and compare the contours and the resulting height statistics with the velocity-maximum contours. If the two definitions frequently diverge, especially during jet merging or strong eddy activity, or if the reported exponents $\zeta_2$, $\xi_2$, and the multifractal widths change materially under the alternative definition, the central claim is not robust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The interface between successive vorticity shear zones, tracked as the locus of local maxima of the zonal velocity $u(x,y,t)$ at fixed $x$, is not a smooth material line but a rough, irregular contour whose fluctuations carry turbulence-like statistics. The height field $h(x,t)=C(x,t)-\bar{C}(x)$ has a Gaussian core with sub-Gaussian tails; the speed field $v_C = dh/dt$ has heavy tails; the height variance spectrum shows the $\beta$-plane turbulence power laws $f^{-5}$, $f^{-5/3}$, and $f^{-7/2}$, while the sectorial mean height spectrum decays as $f^{-2}$; the second-order temporal structure function violates differentiability at short times ($\zeta_2 \neq 2$) with $\zeta_2 \to 2$ for larger $R_\beta$; and the interfaces are multifractal, with the singularity range narrowing as $R_\beta$ increases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the vorticity interfaces are exactly the local maxima of the eastward zonal velocity at each $x$, a correspondence checked by eye through animations rather than by quantitative comparison with jumps in vorticity; if this identification fails when jets wobble, merge, or eddies pass, every reported exponent belongs to the tracking rule, not to the physical interface.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is correct, the fluctuating edges of zonal jets have a complete statistical description: sub-Gaussian heights, fat-tailed speeds, and specific spectral exponents, which can serve as quantitative benchmarks for reduced models of planetary jet dynamics.
  • The variance spectrum with $f^{-5}$, $f^{-5/3}$, and $f^{-7/2}$ regimes indicates that interfacial height variance tracks the underlying beta-plane turbulence energy spectrum, so interfacial variance measurements could act as a proxy for the turbulence at these scales.
  • The short-time non-differentiability ($\zeta_2 < 2$) rules out smooth stochastic contour models and would need to be reproduced by any stochastic differential equation intended to model jet-interface evolution.
  • The systematic trend of $\zeta_2 \to 2$ and the narrowing singularity spectrum as $R_\beta$ increases show that stronger, more persistent jets host smoother, less intermittent interfaces, a distinction relevant to comparing terrestrial and gas-giant zonal flows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same tracking rule should be applied to westward jets or to both velocity extrema to test whether the reported exponents are specific to eastward jet flanks or universal to all jet interfaces.
  • Beyond the paper: a quantitative validation of the velocity-maximum tracking against an independent vorticity-based interface definition, such as level sets of $\omega$ or ridges of $|\nabla \omega|$, would settle whether the statistical laws belong to the physical interfaces or to the tracking rule.
  • Beyond the paper: because interfaces induce lateral shear, the reported statistics suggest a testable extension in Lagrangian transport: microplastic-like tracers in the same DNS should show enhanced stretching and preferential sampling near interfaces with larger $R_\beta$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies fluctuating vorticity interfaces in forced-dissipative barotropic beta-plane turbulence by direct numerical simulation. The authors identify each interface with the local maximum of the zonal velocity u(x,y,t) along y at fixed x, define a height field h(x,t) as the deviation from the time-averaged contour, and then characterize its statistics: height PDFs with sub-Gaussian tails, heavy-tailed PDFs of fluctuation speeds, power-law frequency spectra of sectorial mean and variance, a second-order temporal structure function S2(τ) with a short-time exponent ζ2<2 that approaches 2 with increasing zonostrophy parameter Rβ, and a multifractal spectrum Dq that narrows as Rβ increases. The authors interpret these results as quantitative statistical laws for jet-interface fluctuations and suggest relevance for transport of microplastics and other particles.

Significance. If the reported exponents are robust, this would be a useful systematic characterization of interface fluctuations in a classical geophysical turbulence model, and the paper adds to the relatively sparse literature on fluctuating jet boundaries. The DNS setup is standard and clearly described: N=1024 and 2048 pseudo-spectral runs, hyperviscosity, narrow-band forcing, five values of β, and 1000 statistically independent snapshots for statistics. The paper is also honest that the tracking rule is motivated by visual inspection. The main novelty lies in treating the jet edge as a tracked random curve and extracting scaling laws; however, because every reported statistic is a functional of the tracked contour, the lack of a quantitative validation of the tracking rule is a load-bearing weakness. The manuscript would be strengthened substantially by error bars and fit ranges for all exponents, a quantitative comparison with independent interface definitions, and a clarification of how contour identity is maintained under merging or disappearance.

major comments (6)
  1. [Section II, contour identification] The entire analysis rests on identifying the vorticity interface with the local maximum of u(x,y,t) at each x and t. The paper's justification is visual and qualitative: 'It appears that the vorticity interfaces correspond to the local maxima...' and 'quite remarkable to notice from an animation.' No quantitative comparison is made against an independent definition, such as maxima of |∂ω/∂y| or level sets of the zonally filtered vorticity. If the algorithm occasionally locks onto a transient eddy maximum, jumps between neighboring maxima during jet wobble, or fails when a contour shrinks and disappears, then the reported sub-Gaussian PDFs, spectral exponents, ζ2<2, and multifractal widths may be properties of the tracking rule rather than of the physical vorticity boundaries. Please provide a quantitative validation, at least for selected snapshots and Rβ values, and state how multiple candidate maxima are resolved and how contour identity is maintained over time.
  2. [Equation (3) and Section II] The height field h(x,t)=C(x,t)−Cbar(x) assumes that C(x,t) is a single-valued, continuously trackable function of x and t. The manuscript does not state what happens when a jet interface weakens, merges with another jet, or disappears locally, nor how Cbar(x) is computed in regions where the contour is absent. Without such a procedure, the time average in Eq. (3) is not well defined for fragmented contours, and the PDFs and structure functions may be biased by arbitrary splicing. Please specify the tracking and identity-maintenance algorithm explicitly.
  3. [Abstract and Section V (structure functions)] The abstract states that the authors calculate 'the moments of the time-increments of the interfacial height fluctuations,' but the paper reports only the second-order structure function S2(τ) in Eq. (5) and Fig. 5(a). No higher-order moments are shown, so the claim of roughness and the discussion of intermittency are based on a single moment. Please either add higher-order structure functions or revise the abstract and the corresponding statements to refer specifically to the second-order moment.
  4. [Fig. 4(d,e) and Fig. 5(a)] The reported spectral exponents f^-2, f^-5, f^-5/3, and f^-7/2, as well as the structure-function exponents ζ2 and ξ2≈1.1, are presented without fit ranges, confidence intervals, or error bars. In particular, the f^-5 and f^-7/2 regimes are asserted from log-log plots with a short frequency range, and the text gives no criterion for what counts as a scaling range. Please provide a table of all exponents with the fitted frequency/time ranges, the number of independent samples, and an uncertainty estimate (for example, bootstrap over sectors or over independent time blocks).
  5. [Section VI, multifractal analysis] The multifractal analysis defines H(x,y,t)=|h(x,y,t)|+0.001 and then computes partition functions over segments of the interfacial contour. There are two problems. First, h is a function of x and t, so the notation H(x,y,t) is inconsistent and the coarse-graining sum over x is ambiguous if H is meant to depend on y. Second, the additive constant 0.001 is a free parameter that strongly affects Zq(l) for negative q, where small values of H dominate; the reported broadening of Dq for negative q may therefore be an artifact of this offset. Please clarify the definition, test sensitivity to the offset, and consider using a measure that is not contaminated by an arbitrary additive constant.
  6. [General reporting of exponents] Several central claims—ζ2→2 with increasing Rβ, the narrowing of the multifractal spectrum, and the approach of the speed PDF to Gaussian—are described qualitatively rather than numerically. The paper would be significantly more convincing if, for each Rβ, the authors reported the measured ζ2, ξ2, the width of the singularity spectrum, and a measure of the tail of P(vC), together with their statistical uncertainties. This would allow the reader to assess the Rβ dependence claimed in the text.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] There are several typographical errors: 'multifractactal' in the last line of the introduction, 'fluctuationspeeds' two sentences later, and 'Ekmann' for Ekman in the model paragraph. Please proofread the text.
  2. [Section II, Eq. (3)] The time average in Eq. (3) is written as an integral over T, but the practical computation uses 1000 discrete snapshots. Please clarify whether the average is over the same snapshots used for the PDFs and spectra, and whether the integration is approximated by a sum.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption states Rβ = 7.5 (β = 50) for all three panels, but the text and Fig. 1 present β=10 as Rβ=6.3. Please check that the caption in Fig. 2 is consistent with the actual parameters of the snapshot.
  4. [Section VI, Eq. for partition function] The partition function is written with a sum over i from 0 to Nl−1, but the text uses Hl,i = Σ_{x=li}^{l(i+1)} H(x,y); the lower limit should be li or l(i) with a clearly defined integer index. Please rewrite this equation with unambiguous notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported exponents are direct DNS measurements of a tracked contour, with no parameter fitted to reproduce them and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper is an observational DNS study. The central quantities—height PDFs, speed distributions, frequency spectra, structure-function exponents ζ2 and ξ2, and multifractal spectra—are computed directly from the time series of the tracked contour C(x,t) defined in Section II, not obtained by fitting any parameter to match a target result. The only operational assumption is the identification of the vorticity interface with local maxima of the zonal velocity u(x,y,t), asserted from visual inspection and animations rather than from an independent interface definition. That is a validity or correctness risk, because the reported exponents are statistics of the tracked maxima, but it is not circular in the derivation-chain sense: the statistics do not reduce by construction to the inputs of the tracking rule, and no quantity is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. Self-citations [2,37] are used only for standard multifractal-analysis procedures and for a comparison with a previous active-suspension interface study; the target claims do not rest on any uniqueness theorem or ansatz imported solely from those papers. The f^-2, f^-5, f^-5/3, and f^-7/2 spectral laws and the ζ2<2 roughness exponent are new measurements, so the derivation chain is self-contained apart from the unvalidated but non-circular interface identification.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; the interface contour and height field are diagnostics constructed from the simulated flow. The main burden on the reader is accepting five modeling and analysis assumptions, chiefly the operational identification of interfaces with velocity maxima and the stationarity of the height statistics. The only hand-chosen numeric constants are the multifractal offset and the sector count.

free parameters (2)
  • Multifractal offset epsilon = 0.001
    Added to |h| to make H positive definite in the multifractal partition function; directly affects negative-q moments, and no sensitivity study is reported.
  • Number of sectors Ns = 32
    Used in Eq. (4) to define sectoral mean and variance; no convergence or robustness check is provided.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Barotropic beta-plane equation (Eq. 1) is a faithful model for planetary zonal jets.
    The entire study is built on this standard geophysical model; the paper acknowledges the approximation (shallow layer, f = f0 + beta y) but does not justify its validity for the specific conclusions about real planetary atmospheres.
  • domain assumption The height-field time series is statistically stationary, so the time-averaged contour is a valid reference and 1000 snapshots are independent.
    The PDFs and spectra rely on stationarity; the paper states that snapshots are well-separated and statistically independent but provides no autocorrelation or convergence test.
  • ad hoc to paper Local maxima of zonal velocity u(x,y,t) at fixed x coincide with vorticity interfaces.
    This is the algorithmic definition of the interface; it is supported by visual inspection of one snapshot and by animations but not by any quantitative comparison with vorticity jumps or other definitions.
  • domain assumption The height field h(x,t) is single-valued along x, so a single contour C(x,t) can be tracked.
    The algorithm identifies one contour per x; if multiple maxima or contour breakups occur, the height statistics could be biased, and no handling of such events is described.
  • standard math Standard multifractal formalism (partition function, Legendre transform) applies to the height field.
    The analysis uses established methods from Refs. [1,2,67]; the paper does not derive or test the convergence of D_q for finite l.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluctuating interfaces in barotropic beta-plane turbulence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X7KZLABX

@misc{pith2026250723493,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluctuating interfaces in barotropic beta-plane turbulence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X7KZLABX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23493}
}
abstract

Zonal jets manifest themselves as bands with sharp interfaces in the vorticity configuration. We develop an algorithm to track these fluctuating vorticity interfaces and systematically investigate their characteristic spatio-temporal behavior. While the interfacial height fluctuations are typically sub-Gaussian, the corresponding $\textit{fluctuation speeds}$ exhibit wider, heavy-tailed distributions reflecting the influence of lateral dispersion induced by the zonal velocity profile along the interfacial contours. The temporal evolution of these fluctuations is further characterized through their power spectrum displaying scale invariance in the frequency domain. The sharp, dense, shock-like features present in the time series of the $\textit{height}$ field suggest a possible lacking of differentiability. We confirm this by calculating the moments of the time-increments of the interfacial height fluctuations. Finally, the fractal nature of these boundaries is investigated systematically through a multifractal approach, revealing the non-trivial, complex statistics of interfaces in such geophysical, turbulent flows.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.23493 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Pseudocolor plots of the vorticity fields with the zonostrophy parameter (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) A representative snapshot of the zonal velocity field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Representative space-time plots (kymograph) of the height field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Probability density functions (PDF) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) A loglog plot of the second-order structure function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Frisch, Turbulence: The Legacy of A

    U. Frisch, Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    Mukherjee, S

    S. Mukherjee, S. D. Murugan, R. Mukherjee, and S. S. Ray, Turbulent flows are not uniformly multifractal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 184002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Kondratyev and G

    K. Kondratyev and G. Hunt, Weather and Climate on Planets (1st ed. Oxford; Pergamon Press, 1982)

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    de Pater and J

    I. de Pater and J. J. Lissauer, Planetary Sciences , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Galperin and P

    B. Galperin and P. L. Read, Zonal Jets: Phenomenol- ogy, Genesis, and Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    T. E. Stringer, Diffusion in toroidal plasmas with radial electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 770 (1969)

    work page 1969

  7. [7]

    Rozhansky and M

    Y. Rozhansky and M. Tendler, Plasma rotation in toka- maks, in Review of Plasma Physics , Vol. 19, edited by B. B. Kadomtsev (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1996) p. 147

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    P. H. Diamond, S.-I. Itoh, K. Itoh, and T. S. Hahm, Zonal flows in plasma—a review, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 47, R35 (2005)

    work page 2005

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    P. B. Rhines, Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 69, 417–443 (1975)

    1975

  2. [10]

    Galperin, S

    B. Galperin, S. Sukoriansky, N. Dikovskaya, P. Read, Y. Yamazaki, and R. Wordsworth, Anisotropic turbu- lence and zonal jets in rotating flows with a β-effect, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 13, 83 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    Bolton, A

    S. Bolton, A. Adriani, V. Adumitroaie, M. Allison, J. An- derson, S. Atreya, J. Bloxham, S. Brown, J. Connerney, E. Dejong, W. Folkner, D. Gautier, D. Grassi, S. Gulkis, T. Guillot, C. Hansen, W. Hubbard, L. Iess, A. Ingersoll, and R. Wilson, Jupiter’s interior and deep atmosp...

    2017

  4. [12]

    P. L. Read, The dynamics of jupiter’s and saturn’s weather layers: A synthesis after cassini and juno, An- nual Review of Fluid Mechanics 56, 271 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    T. E. Dowling, Jets in planetary atmospheres (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Hadley, Concerning the cause of the general trade- winds, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 39, 58 (1735)

    G. Hadley, Concerning the cause of the general trade- winds, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 39, 58 (1735)

  7. [15]

    J. M. Lewis, Clarifying the Dynamics of the General Circulation: Phillips’s 1956 Experiment., Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 79, 39 (1998)

    1998

  8. [16]

    S. M. Uppala, P. W. K ˚Allberg, A. J. Simmons, U. An- drae, V. D. C. Bechtold, M. Fiorino, J. K. Gibson, J. Haseler, A. Hernandez, G. A. Kelly, X. Li, K. Onogi, S. Saarinen, N. Sokka, R. P. Allan, E. Andersson, K. Arpe, M. A. Balmaseda, A. C. M. Beljaars, L. V. D. Berg, J. Bid...

    2005

  9. [17]

    Sokolov and S

    S. Sokolov and S. R. Rintoul, Multiple jets of the antarc- tic circumpolar current south of australia, Journal of Physical Oceanography 37, 1394 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    Berloff, S

    P. Berloff, S. Karabasov, J. T. Farrar, and I. Ka- menkovich, On latency of multiple zonal jets in the oceans, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 686, 534–567 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    Galperin, H

    B. Galperin, H. Nakano, H.-P. Huang, and S. Sukorian- sky, The ubiquitous zonal jets in the atmospheres of giant planets and earth’s oceans, Geophysical Research Letters 31 (2004)

    2004

  12. [20]

    Berloff, I

    P. Berloff, I. Kamenkovich, and J. Pedlosky, A model of multiple zonal jets in the oceans: Dynamical and kine- matical analysis, Journal of Physical Oceanography 39, 2711 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    N. A. Maximenko, B. Bang, and H. Sasaki, Observational evidence of alternating zonal jets in the world ocean, Geo- physical Research Letters 32 (2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    N. A. Maximenko, O. V. Melnichenko, P. P. Niiler, and H. Sasaki, Stationary mesoscale jet-like features in the ocean, Geophysical Research Letters 35 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Cravatte, E

    S. Cravatte, E. Kestenare, F. Marin, P. Dutrieux, and E. Firing, Subthermocline and intermediate zonal cur- rents in the tropical pacific ocean: Paths and vertical structure, Journal of Physical Oceanography 47, 2305 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    G¨ urcan and P

    D. G¨ urcan and P. H. Diamond, Zonal flows and pattern formation, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and The- oretical 48, 293001 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Bouchet, C

    F. Bouchet, C. Nardini, and T. Tangarife, Kinetic the- ory of jet dynamics in the stochastic barotropic and 2d navier-stokes equations, Journal of Statistical Physics 153, 572 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Bouchet, J

    F. Bouchet, J. B. Marston, and T. Tangarife, Fluctua- tions and large deviations of reynolds stresses in zonal jet dynamics, Physics of Fluids 30, 015110 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Bouchet and A

    F. Bouchet and A. Venaille, Statistical mechanics of two- dimensional and geophysical flows, Physics Reports 515, 227 (2012), statistical mechanics of two-dimensional and geophysical flows

    2012

  20. [28]

    Heus and H

    T. Heus and H. J. J. Jonker, Subsiding shells around shal- low cumulus clouds, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 1003 (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    Westerweel, C

    J. Westerweel, C. Fukushima, J. M. Pedersen, and J. C. R. Hunt, Momentum and scalar transport at the turbulent/non-turbulent interface of a jet, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 631, 199 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    Chauhan, J

    K. Chauhan, J. Philip, C. M. De Silva, N. Hutchins, and I. Marusic, The turbulent/non-turbulent interface and entrainment in a boundary layer, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics 742, 119 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Watanabe, Y

    T. Watanabe, Y. Sakai, K. Nagata, Y. Ito, and T. Hayase, Turbulent mixing of passive scalar near turbulent and non-turbulent interface in mixing layers, Physics of Flu- ids 27 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Borrell and J

    G. Borrell and J. Jim´ enez, Properties of the turbulent/non-turbulent interface in boundary lay- ers, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 801, 554 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    G. E. Elsinga and C. B. Da Silva, How the turbulent/non- turbulent interface is different from internal turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 866, 216 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    V. Nair, T. Heus, and M. van Reeuwijk, A lagrangian study of interfaces at the edges of cumulus clouds, Jour- nal of the Atmospheric Sciences 78, 2397 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    N. Pal, P. Perlekar, A. Gupta, and R. Pandit, Binary- fluid turbulence: Signatures of multifractal droplet dy- namics and dissipation reduction, Physical Review E 93, 063115 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    N. B. Padhan and R. Pandit, Activity-induced droplet propulsion and multifractality, Physical Review Research 5, L032013 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Mukherjee, K

    S. Mukherjee, K. Kumar, and S. S. Ray, Turbulence- induced fluctuating interfaces in heterogeneously-active suspensions (2025), arXiv:2502.16443 [cond-mat.soft]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Pocheau, Scale invariance in turbulent front propaga- tion, Physical Review E 49, 1109 (1994)

    A. Pocheau, Scale invariance in turbulent front propaga- tion, Physical Review E 49, 1109 (1994)

    1994

  31. [39]

    Xin, Front propagation in heterogeneous media, SIAM review 42, 161 (2000)

    J. Xin, Front propagation in heterogeneous media, SIAM review 42, 161 (2000)

    2000

  32. [40]

    C. R. Koudella and Z. Neufeld, Reaction front propaga- tion in a turbulent flow, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 70, 026307 (2004)

    2004

  33. [41]

    Corwin, The kardar–parisi–zhang equation and univer- sality class, Random matrices: Theory and applications 1, 1130001 (2012)

    I. Corwin, The kardar–parisi–zhang equation and univer- sality class, Random matrices: Theory and applications 1, 1130001 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Bentkamp, T

    L. Bentkamp, T. D. Drivas, C. C. Lalescu, and M. Wilczek, The statistical geometry of material loops in turbulence, Nature Communications 13, 2088 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    A. Roy, J. R. Picardo, B. Emerson, T. C. Lieuwen, and R. I. Sujith, Small-scale intermittency of premixed turbu- lent flames, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 957, A21 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=End6Kq4WXn0, spatio-temporal evolution of interfaces between succes- sive jets

  37. [45]

    R. K. Scott and L. M. Polvani, Forced-dissipative shallow-water turbulence on the sphere and the atmo- spheric circulation of the giant planets, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 3158 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    G. P. Williams, Planetary circulations: 1. barotropic rep- resentation of jovian and terrestrial turbulence, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 35, 1399 (1978)

    1978

  39. [47]

    G. K. Vallis and M. E. Maltrud, Generation of mean flows and jets on a beta plane and over topography, Journal of Physical Oceanography 23, 1346 (1993)

    1993

  40. [48]

    Danilov and D

    S. Danilov and D. Gurarie, Scaling, spectra and zonal jets in beta-plane turbulence, Physics of Fluids 16, 2592 (2004)

    2004

  41. [49]

    D. K. Lilly, Numerical simulation of two-dimensional tur- bulence, The Physics of Fluids 12, II (1969)

    1969

  42. [50]

    S. Chen, R. E. Ecke, G. L. Eyink, M. Rivera, M. Wan, and Z. Xiao, Physical mechanism of the two-dimensional inverse energy cascade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 084502 (2006)

    2006

  43. [51]

    Boffetta and R

    G. Boffetta and R. E. Ecke, Two-dimensional turbulence, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 44, 427 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    S. S. Ray, D. Mitra, P. Perlekar, and R. Pandit, Dynamic multiscaling in two-dimensional fluid turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 184503 (2011)

    2011

  45. [53]

    M. E. Maltrud and G. K. Vallis, Energy spectra and co- herent structures in forced two-dimensional and beta- plane turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 228, 321–342 (1991)

    1991

  46. [54]

    R. K. Scott and A.-S. Tissier, The generation of zonal jets by large-scale mixing, Physics of Fluids 24, 126601 9 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2245yIifaFY, spatio-temporal evolution of the contour marking the interfaces between successive jets

  48. [56]

    S. M. Cox and P. C. Matthews, Exponential time dif- ferencing for stiff systems, Journal of Computational Physics 176, 430 (2002)

    2002

  49. [57]

    Srinivasan and W

    K. Srinivasan and W. Young, Zonostrophic instability, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 69, 1633 (2012)

    2012

  50. [58]

    Cope, The Dynamics of Geophysical and Astrophysi- cal Turbulence, Ph.D

    L. Cope, The Dynamics of Geophysical and Astrophysi- cal Turbulence, Ph.D. thesis, Apollo - University of Cam- bridge Repository (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Sukoriansky, N

    S. Sukoriansky, N. Dikovskaya, and B. Galperin, On the arrest of inverse energy cascade and the rhines scale, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 3312 (2007)

    2007

  52. [60]

    R. K. Scott and D. G. Dritschel, The structure of zonal jets in geostrophic turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechan- ics 711, 576–598 (2012)

    2012

  53. [61]

    Kamenkovich, P

    I. Kamenkovich, P. Berloff, and J. Pedlosky, Role of eddy forcing in the dynamics of multiple zonal jets in a model of the north atlantic, Journal of Physical Oceanography 39, 1361 (2009)

    2009

  54. [62]

    Galperin, R

    B. Galperin, R. Young, S. Sukoriansky, N. Dikovskaya, P. Read, A. Lancaster, and D. Armstrong, Cassini obser- vations reveal a regime of zonostrophic macroturbulence on jupiter, Icarus 229, 295–320 (2014)

    2014

  55. [63]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UN2rWx1r4Yk, spatio-temporal evolution of the contours obtained by identifying the velocity maxima of eastward jets tracks the vorticity interfaces

  56. [64]

    K. R. Sreenivasan and C. Meneveau, The fractal facets of turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 173, 357–386 (1986)

    1986

  57. [65]

    Meneveau and K

    C. Meneveau and K. R. Sreenivasan, Simple multifractal cascade model for fully developed turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1424 (1987)

    1987

  58. [66]

    Meneveau and K

    C. Meneveau and K. R. Sreenivasan, The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 224, 429–484 (1991)

    1991

  59. [67]

    Meneveau and K

    C. Meneveau and K. R. Sreenivasan, The multifractal spectrum of the dissipation field in turbulent flows, Nu- clear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 2, 49 (1987)

    1987

  60. [68]

    J. R. Picardo, D. Vincenzi, N. Pal, and S. S. Ray, Prefer- ential sampling of elastic chains in turbulent flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 244501 (2018)

    2018

  61. [69]

    J. R. Picardo, R. Singh, S. S. Ray, and D. Vincenzi, Dy- namics of a long chain in turbulent flows: impact of vor- tices, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 378, 20190405 (2020)

    2020

  62. [70]

    J. Bec, S. Musacchio, and S. S. Ray, Sticky elastic colli- sions, Phys. Rev. E 87, 063013 (2013)

    2013

  63. [71]

    J. Bec, S. S. Ray, E. W. Saw, and H. Homann, Abrupt growth of large aggregates by correlated coalescences in turbulent flow, Phys. Rev. E 93, 031102 (2016)

    2016

  64. [72]

    Anand, S

    P. Anand, S. S. Ray, and G. Subramanian, Orientation dynamics of sedimenting anisotropic particles in turbu- lence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 034501 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    J. R. Picardo, L. Agasthya, R. Govindarajan, and S. S. Ray, Flow structures govern particle collisions in turbu- lence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 032601 (2019)

    2019

  66. [74]

    S. S. Ray, Non-intermittent turbulence: Lagrangian chaos and irreversibility, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 072601 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.