pith. sign in

arxiv: 1510.03391 · v1 · pith:XC6777RMnew · submitted 2015-10-12 · 🧮 math.DS

Counterexamples for IFS-attractors

classification 🧮 math.DS
keywords counterexamplesweakattractorattractorsbanachcalledcollectioncompact
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we deal with the part of Fractal Theory related to finite families of (weak) contractions, called iterated function systems (IFS, herein). An attractor is a compact set which remains invariant for such a family. Thus, we consider spaces homeomorphic to attractors of either IFS or weak IFS, as well, which we will refer to as Banach and topological fractals, respectively. We present a collection of counterexamples in order to show that all the presented definitions are essential, though they are not equivalent in general.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.