On the generic part of the cohomology of non-compact unitary Shimura varieties

Ana Caraiani; Peter Scholze

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 19 references

On the generic part of the cohomology of non-compact unitary Shimura varieties

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that the generic part of mod $\ell$ cohomology of non-compact unitary Shimura varieties is concentrated above the middle degree, and compactly supported cohomology below it.

desk verdict Genuinely new geometry and a serious but fixable level problem: Theorem 1.1 is only proved for levels divisible by N0, not arbitrary neat K. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01898 v2 pith:XC7XJPNU submitted 2019-09-04 math.NT math.AG

Ana Caraiani , Peter Scholze This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.NTmath.AG MSC 11G1811F8014G35

keywords Shimuravarietiesmod-ℓcohomologyHodge-TateperiodmapIgusaunitarygroupstorsionGaloisrepresentationsEisenstein

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that, for even-dimensional quasi-split unitary Shimura varieties attached to a CM field $F$ with $F^+\neq\mathbb{Q}$, the mod $\ell$ cohomology localized at a ``generic'' Hecke eigensystem is concentrated above the middle degree: $H^i(X_K,\mathbb{F}_\ell)_{\mathfrak m}$ can be nonzero only for $i\ge d$, while $H^i_c(X_K,\mathbb{F}_\ell)_{\mathfrak m}$ can be nonzero only for $i\le d$, where $d=[F^+:\mathbb{Q}]n^2$. The genericity condition is that the associated semisimple Galois representation $\rho_{\mathfrak m}$ has length at most two and has Frobenius eigenvalues at a totally split prime $p$ satisfying $\alpha_{i,v}\neq p\alpha_{j,v}$ for $i\neq j$. The same conclusion is deduced with $\mathbb{Z}_\ell$ coefficients, including torsion-freeness of $H^d(X_K,\mathbb{Z}_\ell)_{\mathfrak m}$, together with a clean splitting of the excision sequence for boundary cohomology. The reason to care is that the boundary of these non-compact spaces contains the locally symmetric spaces for $GL_n/F$, so the result controls even Eisenstein cohomology classes coming from $GL_n$; this control was the new input used for local-global compatibility and potential automorphy without self-duality. The decisive geometric tool is a description of the fibres of the Hodge--Tate period map on compactified Shimura varieties as compactified Igusa varieties.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Hodge--Tate period map from the infinite-level perfectoid Shimura variety to the flag variety of totally isotropic $F$-stable subspaces, together with the Igusa varieties attached to Newton strata. An Igusa variety is the moduli space of isomorphisms between the $p$-divisible group of the universal abelian variety and a fixed $p$-divisible group $X$, up to $p$-power isogeny. The paper's Theorem 1.10 identifies the fibres of the Hodge--Tate period map on the minimal and toroidal compactifications with partial minimal and toroidal compactifications of these Igusa varieties, as open immersions with the same rank-1 points; this transfers cohomology computations from the Shimura variety to the compactified Igusa varieties. On those varieties, the argument combines affineness of the partial minimal compactifications, giving an Artin-vanishing upper bound, with a semiperversity result for nearby cycles giving a lower bound, and with a trace-formula computation of the $\mathbb{Q}_\ell$-cohomology of Igusa varieties that is used to attach Galois representations and to force non-ordinary Newton strata to disappear. The length-at-most-two hypothesis is what guarantees that only the full-rank boundary stratum contributes, making the excision sequence split cleanly around the middle degree.

What would settle it

A direct way to test the claim is to compute, for one maximal ideal $\mathfrak m$ satisfying the three hypotheses, the localized groups $H^i(X_K,\mathbb{F}_\ell)_{\mathfrak m}$ for $i<d$ and $H^i_c(X_K,\mathbb{F}_\ell)_{\mathfrak m}$ for $i>d$ using the trace formula and the Section 6 boundary formula; any nonzero group in a forbidden degree would refute Theorem 1.1. In particular, the Section 6 boundary formula should give zero for every intermediate-rank cusp label after localization at such an $\mathfrak m$, and a nonzero contribution there would pinpoint where the proof's single-stratum mechanism fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 1.1. For a quasi-split unitary group of even dimension with $F^+\neq\mathbb{Q}$, fix a maximal ideal $\mathfrak m$ in the abstract Hecke algebra such that the attached semisimple Galois representation $\rho_{\mathfrak m}$ has length at most two and is generic at a totally split prime $p\neq\ell$ in the sense that no two Frobenius eigenvalues have ratio $p$. Then the localization of the cohomology of the Shimura variety at $\mathfrak m$ vanishes below the middle degree, and the compactly supported cohomology vanishes above the middle degree, with $d=[F^+:\mathbb{Q}]n^2$. The companion geometric result, Theorem 1.10, is that the fibres of the Hodge--Tate period map on both the minimal and toroidal compactifications are canonically the partial compactifications of Igusa varieties, so comparing cohomology of the fibres with cohomology of Igusa varieties remains valid at the boundary. The paper argues that the boundary cohomology is then governed by a single full-rank $GL_n$ stratum, and that the boundary comparison theorem forces boundary contributions to be confined to the two sides of degree $d$ in exactly the way described by the excision sequence around the middle degree.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Galois representation attached to the Hecke eigensystem has length at most two; if it had length three or more, multiple boundary strata could contribute and the concentration conclusion is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The generic part of the mod $\ell$ cohomology of a non-compact even-dimensional unitary Shimura variety is nonzero only at or above the middle degree, while compactly supported cohomology is nonzero only at or below it.
The same concentration statements hold with $\mathbb{Z}_\ell$ coefficients, and the middle-degree group $H^d(X_K,\mathbb{Z}_\ell)_{\mathfrak m}$ is torsion-free.
The excision long exact sequence splits boundary cohomology cleanly: below the middle degree everything maps into compactly supported cohomology, above the middle degree everything comes from ordinary cohomology, and an explicit exact sequence of length four holds around degree $d$.
For a non-Eisenstein eigensystem, ordinary and compactly supported cohomology coincide and are concentrated in degree $d$, matching the folklore vanishing prediction for the locally symmetric space of $GL_n/F$ in this setting.
Because the theorem covers Eisenstein classes coming from the $GL_n$ boundary, it gives control over torsion classes in the cohomology of that boundary, and this control feeds into local-global compatibility and potential automorphy results without any self-duality hypothesis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: if the length-at-most-two hypothesis really is the obstruction it appears to be, the natural next step is a version of the boundary comparison theorem that permits a second boundary stratum while still controlling its possible degrees; the Section 6 boundary formula gives a computational tool for testing when such a stratum can survive localization.
Beyond the paper: the clean boundary-splitting picture suggests that the folklore vanishing range for $GL_n/F$ with torsion coefficients may be accessible by reduction to unitary Shimura varieties, provided the remaining cases of local-global compatibility at $\ell$ are supplied; the present theorem contributes exactly the boundary control that such a reduction would need.
Beyond the paper: because the fibre comparison on compactifications is proved at the level of perfectoid spaces with the same rank-1 points, the same open immersions should transport other cohomology theories on the compactified Shimura variety, such as intersection cohomology or nearby cycles on integral models, to compactified Igusa varieties.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new content is the geometry: compactified Igusa varieties, the identification of fibers of the compactified Hodge–Tate period map with them (Theorem 1.10), and the semiperversity result. The trace-formula computation of Igusa cohomology and the boundary computation in Section 6 are substantial and look careful. The paper is also commendably honest about its restrictions—Remark 1.3 says the length-at-most-2 hypothesis is critical, Remark 1.2 says F+ ≠ Q could be removed with extra work, and Remark 2.6.3 retracts an earlier incorrect claim. That is the right way to write mathematics. The problem is the level. Theorem 1.1 is stated for an arbitrary neat compact open K, but the proof in §2.8 only treats principal level K(N), and the inputs (Corollary 5.1.3, hence Theorem 2.8.6) require N divisible by a sufficiently large N0, as noted in Remark 5.4.5. No descent from K(N) to arbitrary K is supplied. This is not a formality: when the covering degree is divisible by ℓ, Hochschild–Serre does not descend mod ℓ cohomology, because Fℓ is not a direct summand of Fℓ[G]. So the theorem as stated is not established. The gap is fixable—restrict the statement to levels divisible by N0, or prove a transfer argument—but it is load-bearing for the statement as written. The length-at-most-2 condition is a real restriction, but the authors flag it as critical and it seems necessary for the method; that is not a defect in the proof. The heavy reliance on the authors' prior work (CS17) and on the concurrent ACC+18 is appropriate: the dependencies are explicit and the cited results are published or in wide circulation. Who gets value from this? People working on torsion in Shimura variety cohomology and the Calegari–Geraghty method. The applications in ACC+18 rely on the geometric results and on the concentration statement at the levels actually used there; the full generality of Theorem 1.1 may not be needed for those applications. The paper deserves a serious referee. I would send it out, with the level question as the main point to resolve before acceptance.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a vanishing theorem for the m-localized mod ℓ cohomology of non-compact unitary Shimura varieties associated to quasi-split unitary groups of even dimension. Under the hypotheses (i) F^+ ≠ Q, (ii) the attached semisimple Galois representation ρ_m has length at most 2, and (iii) there is a totally split prime p ≠ ℓ with generic Frobenius eigenvalues, the theorem asserts that H^i(X_K, F_ℓ)_m = 0 for i < d and H^i_c(X_K, F_ℓ)_m = 0 for i > d. The proof proceeds through the geometry of the Hodge–Tate period map on minimal and toroidal compactifications, whose fibers are shown to be compactified Igusa varieties, combined with semiperversity of nearby cycles, a trace-formula computation of Igusa cohomology, and a boundary-cohomology computation. The paper also derives consequences for Z_ℓ coefficients, torsion-freeness in the middle degree, and applications to Eisenstein classes.

Significance. If correct, the main theorem is an important extension of the authors' previous compact case [CS17] to non-compact Shimura varieties, and it provides exactly the control over torsion cohomology needed in [ACC+18] for potential automorphy theorems without self-duality. The geometric core, Theorem 1.10, identifying fibers of the compactified Hodge–Tate period map with compactified Igusa varieties, is a substantial and reusable contribution. The paper is carefully structured: the main theorem is reduced in Section 2.8 to four named inputs, each developed in later sections, and the trace-formula and boundary computations are made quite explicit. The main weakness is a level-descent gap: the proof of Theorem 1.1 establishes the statement only for principal levels divisible by an auxiliary integer N0, while the theorem is stated for arbitrary neat compact open K.

major comments (2)

[§2.8, proof of Theorem 1.1] The proof establishes the concentration statement only for principal levels K(N) with N divisible by an auxiliary integer N0. Theorem 2.8.6 (Corollary 5.1.3) and Theorem 2.8.7 both carry this hypothesis, as noted in Remark 5.4.5, and the trace-formula computation of Section 5 is stated only under it. Theorem 1.1, however, is asserted for an arbitrary neat compact open K. No reduction from arbitrary K to such a principal level is given. This is not a formal Hochschild–Serre descent: when the finite cover X_{K(N)} → X_K has degree divisible by ℓ, the F_ℓ[G]-permutation module is not semisimple and the trace map can be zero, so the m-localized F_ℓ-cohomology at the deeper level need not determine the cohomology at K. The same gap affects the compact-support statement, which is obtained by Poincaré duality at the end of the proof. The theorem should be restricted to levels divisible by N0 (or to levels whose index in K(N0) is prime to ℓ), or a genuine level-descent argument must be supplied.
[§2.8, Theorems 2.8.6 and 2.8.7] The statements of these two theorems in Section 2.8 omit the level condition that is explicitly present in their proofs: Theorem 5.1.2 and Corollary 5.1.3 assume N is divisible by N0, and Section 6.4 inherits this. As stated, the theorems appear to hold for all neat levels, which is exactly what makes the gap in Theorem 1.1 easy to overlook. The statements should either include the N0 hypothesis or explain why the arguments extend to all levels.

minor comments (4)

[Remark 1.5] The remark asserts that the theorem and its consequences extend to nontrivial Z_ℓ-coefficient systems via the Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence; this extension is not proved and would need the same level conditions as the main theorem.
[Corollary 5.1.3] The symbol q is used both for a rational prime and for the cardinality of a residue field in the displayed characteristic polynomial; this is mildly confusing and should be disambiguated.
[Lemma 2.8.4] The phrase 'choose a rank 1 point of F_ℓ of dimension d−d_b' is not immediately clear, since rank 1 points are usually described by their residue fields and 'dimension' of a point is not standard; please clarify whether this means a rank 1 point whose closure has that dimension.
[Throughout] The arXiv source contains several OCR-style spacing artifacts in the title and abstract (e.g., 'P ART', 'V ARIETIES'); these should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1 is derived from independent geometric and trace-formula inputs, not from its own conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central theorem is not an input to its proof: the hypotheses F+ ≠ Q, length(ρ_m) ≤ 2, and genericity at a totally split prime p do not assert the cohomological concentration conclusion, and the proof derives that conclusion from the affine Igusa compactifications, semiperversity of nearby cycles, the trace-formula computation of Igusa cohomology, and the contrapositive of Theorem 2.8.7. No equation or construction in the proof reduces to the statement being proved. The paper does rely on prior work by the same authors, notably Theorem 2.7.2, which restates [CS17, Theorem 4.4.4], and Proposition 4.3.1, which uses [CS17, Lemma 4.3.15], as well as [Sch15] for Galois representations attached to torsion classes for GL_m. These are independent published results with stated assumptions that do not include the target theorem, so citing them is not circular. The text itself flags the length-at-most-2 hypothesis as critical (Remark 1.3), which is an honest statement of a restrictive input rather than a disguised output. The only caveat visible in the text is that Theorems 2.8.6 and 5.1.2 are stated for levels divisible by a sufficiently large N0 (Remark 5.4.5), while Theorem 1.1 is stated for arbitrary neat K; whether the missing descent from such levels to arbitrary K is valid is a correctness concern, not an equivalence of inputs and outputs. Accordingly, no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted to data, and no postulated entities (particles, forces, dimensions) are introduced. The proof imports deep machinery from prior literature (Scholze 2015; Shin 2010; Lan 2013; CS17; ACC+18) and constructs new geometric objects (partial compactifications of Igusa varieties, Igusa cusp labels), but these are rigorously defined mathematical constructions with an internal role, not entities needing external falsifiable handles. The three hypotheses in Theorem 1.1 are honest scope restrictions on the input eigensystem, not fitted parameters.

assumptions (8)

domain assumption Galois representations associated to mod ℓ systems of Hecke eigenvalues for GL_m over a CM field exist (Scholze 2015, Theorems 4.3.1 and 5.4.3; ACC+18, Theorem 2.3.3).
Used to attach the semisimple representation ρ_m to a maximal ideal m and to control boundary cohomology of Igusa varieties; cited in Sections 1.0.1, 2.8, and 6.
domain assumption The fibers of the Hodge-Tate period map on the open (good reduction) Shimura variety are Igusa varieties (CS17, Theorem 4.4.4, restated as Theorem 2.7.2).
Load-bearing prior result from the authors' earlier paper, used in the proof of Theorem 1.1 to convert statements about the period map into statements about Igusa cohomology.
standard math Shin's stable trace formula expresses the cohomology of Igusa varieties as a sum of stable orbital integrals for G and its endoscopic groups (Theorem 5.3.2, citing Shi10).
Foundation of Section 5: the computation of H*(Igb, Q_ℓ) as a virtual representation and the attached Galois representations (Theorem 5.1.2) depend on this formula.
standard math The local and global Langlands correspondence for GL_n (Harris-Taylor, Shin, Chenevier-Harris) attaches Galois representations to regular L-algebraic, essentially self-dual automorphic representations (Theorem 5.7.1).
Needed to convert the automorphic data coming from the trace formula into the Galois representation ρ_m in Corollary 5.1.3.
domain assumption Perfectoid spaces and diamonds provide the cohomological formalism for the infinite-level Shimura varieties and the Hodge-Tate period map (Scholze 2017; Bhatt-Scholze 2019).
Powers Section 2.6, the definition of the perfectoid Shimura varieties and Theorem 2.6.2, and the fiber arguments of Section 4.
domain assumption The totally real subfield F+ is not Q (Theorem 1.1(i)).
Excludes cuspidal Levi subgroups in the twisted trace formula (Lemma 5.5.3) so that terms at two infinite places vanish; Remark 1.2 notes that removing this would need additional work.
domain assumption The attached Galois representation ρ_m has length at most 2 (Theorem 1.1(ii)).
Flagged as critical in Remark 1.3: it ensures only the GL_n boundary stratum contributes after localization at m, producing the tight excision relation between H^i and H^i_c.
domain assumption There exists a prime p ≠ ℓ splitting completely in F where ρ_m is unramified and generic, with Frobenius eigenvalues α_i ≠ p α_j for all i ≠ j (Theorem 1.1(iii)).
Defines the 'generic part' and enables the p-adic geometry at p; without this condition the result is outside the paper's scope.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the generic part of the cohomology of non-compact unitary Shimura varieties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XC7XJPNU

@misc{pith2026190901898,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the generic part of the cohomology of non-compact unitary Shimura varieties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XC7XJPNU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01898}
}

read the original abstract

We prove that the generic part of the mod l cohomology of Shimura varieties associated to quasi-split unitary groups of even dimension is concentrated above the middle degree, extending our previous work to a non-compact case. The result applies even to Eisenstein cohomology classes coming from the locally symmetric space of the general linear group, and has been used in joint work with Allen, Calegari, Gee, Helm, Le Hung, Newton, Taylor and Thorne to get good control on these classes and deduce potential automorphy theorems without any self-duality hypothesis. Our main geometric result is a computation of the fibers of the Hodge-Tate period map on compactified Shimura varieties, in terms of similarly compactified Igusa varieties.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[1]

Potential automorphy over CM fields

[ACC+18] P. Allen, F. Calegari, A. Caraiani, T. Gee, D. Helm, B. V. L e Hung, J. New- ton, P. Scholze, R. Taylor, and J. Thorne, Potential automorphy over CM ﬁelds , arXiv:1812.09999,

work page Pith review arXiv
[6]

Chenevier and M

[CH13] G. Chenevier and M. Harris, Construction of automorphic Galois representations, II , Camb. J. Math. 1 (2013), no. 1, 53–73. [CS17] A. Caraiani and P. Scholze, On the generic part of the cohomology of compact unitary Shimura varieties , Ann. of Math. (2) 186 (2017), no. 3, 649–766. [Far15] L. Fargues, G-torseurs en théorie de Hodge p-adique, http://...

work page 2013
[7]

Franke, Harmonic analysis in weighted L2-spaces, Ann

[Fra98] J. Franke, Harmonic analysis in weighted L2-spaces, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 31 (1998), no. 2, 181–279. [GK19] W. Goldring and J.-S. Koskivirta, Strata Hasse invariants, Hecke algebras and Galois representations, Inventiones mathematicae 217 (2019), no. 3, 887–984. [Ham15] P. Hamacher, The geometry of Newton strata in the reduction modulo p ...

work page 1998
[8]

Harris and R

[HT01] M. Harris and R. Taylor, The geometry and cohomology of some simple Shimura vari- eties, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 151, Princeton Univer sity Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001, With an appendix by Vladimir G. Berkovich. [Hub96] R. Huber, Étale cohomology of rigid analytic varieties and adic space s, Aspects of Mathematics, E30, Friedr. Vieweg & ...

work page 2001
[9]

Illusie, Déformations de groupes de Barsotti-Tate (d’après A

[Ill85] L. Illusie, Déformations de groupes de Barsotti-Tate (d’après A. Grothe ndieck), Astérisque (1985), no. 127, 151–198, Seminar on arithmetic bundles: the Mordell conjecture (Paris, 1983/84). [Ill94] , Autour du théorème de monodromie locale , Astérisque (1994), no. 223, 9–57, Périodes p-adiques (Bures-sur-Yvette, 1988). [Kat81] N. Katz, Serre-Tate ...

work page 1985
[18]

Scholze and J

[SW13] P. Scholze and J. W einstein, Moduli of p-divisible groups , Camb. J. Math. 1 (2013), no. 2, 145–237. [SW19] , Berkeley lectures on p-adic geometry, http://www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/scholze/Berkeley.pdf,

work page 2013
[19]

[Swa80] R. G. Swan, On seminormality , J. Algebra 67 (1980), 210–229. [Var14] I. Varma, Local-global compatibility for regular algebraic cuspida l automorphic repre- sentation when ℓ⁄= p, ArXiv e-prints (2014). [W ed99] T. W edhorn, Ordinariness in good reductions of Shimura varieties of PEL -type, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 32 (1999), no. 5, 575–618....

work page 1980
[88]

Oort, Foliations in moduli spaces of abelian varieties , J

[Oor04] F. Oort, Foliations in moduli spaces of abelian varieties , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (2004), no. 2, 267–296 (electronic). [OZ02] F. Oort and T. Zink, Families of p-divisible groups with constant Newton polygon , Doc. Math. 7 (2002), 183–201 (electronic). [Pin92] R. Pink, On l-adic sheaves on Shimura varieties and their higher direct i mages in the B...

work page 2004

Show all 19 references

[98]

Lan and B

[LS18] K.-W. Lan and B. Stroh, Compactiﬁcations of subschemes of integral models of Shimura varieties , Forum Math. Sigma 6 (2018), e18,

2018
[105]

Mantovan, On certain unitary group Shimura varieties , Astérisque (2004), no

[Man04] E. Mantovan, On certain unitary group Shimura varieties , Astérisque (2004), no. 291, 201–331, Variétés de Shimura, espaces de Rapoport-Zink et c orrespondances de Lang- lands locales. [Man05] , On the cohomology of certain PEL-type Shimura varieties , Duke Math. J. 12...

2004
[1970]

GENERIC COHOMOLOGY OF NON-COMPACT UNITARY SHIMURA V ARIETI ES 87 [Shi09] S. W. Shin, Counting points on Igusa varieties , Duke Math. J. 146 (2009), no. 3, 509–568. [Shi10] , A stable trace formula for Igusa varieties , J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 9 (2010), no. 4, 847–895. [Shi11] ,...

2009
[2010]

Mœglin and J.-L

[MW89] C. Mœglin and J.-L. W aldspurger, Le spectre résiduel de GL(n), Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 22 (1989), no. 4, 605–674. [Nie15] S. Nie, Fundamental elements of an aﬃne Weyl group , Math. Ann. 362 (2015), no. 1-2, 485–499 (English). [NT16] J. Newton and J. A. Thorne, T...

1989
[2011]

135–187 (English)

Volume 1, Cambridge: C ambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 135–187 (English). [Box15] G. Boxer, Torsion in the Coherent Cohomology of Shimura Varieties and Ga lois Rep- resentations, arXiv:1507.05922,

2014 arXiv
[2012]

Papers based on selected lectures given at the current devel opment mathematics con- ference, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, November 2012, Somerville, MA: International Press, 2013, pp. 193–227. [Sch15] , On torsion in the cohomology of locally symmetric varieties , ...

2015 arXiv
[2013]

Sigma 4 (2016), e1,

[Lan16] , Compactiﬁcations of PEL-type Shimura varieties in ramiﬁed c haracteristics, Forum Math. Sigma 4 (2016), e1,

2016
[2015]

Boyer, Sur la torsion dans la cohomologie des variétés de Shimura de Kottwitz- Harris-Taylor, J

[Boy19] P. Boyer, Sur la torsion dans la cohomologie des variétés de Shimura de Kottwitz- Harris-Taylor, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 18 (2019), no. 3, 499–517 (French). [BS19] B. Bhatt and P. Scholze, Prisms and prismatic cohomology , arXiv:1905.08229,

2019 arXiv
[2017]

II: Groupes de type multiplicatif, et st ructure des schémas en groupes généraux, Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois Marie 1962/64 (S GA 3)

[SGA70] Schémas en groupes. II: Groupes de type multiplicatif, et st ructure des schémas en groupes généraux, Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois Marie 1962/64 (S GA 3). Dirigé par M. Demazure et A. Grothendieck. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 152, Springer-Verlag, B...

1962
[2018]

André, Period mappings and diﬀerential equations

[And03] Y. André, Period mappings and diﬀerential equations. From C to Cp, MSJ Memoirs, vol. 12, Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2003, Tôhoku -Hokkaidô lectures in arithmetic geometry, With appendices by F. Kato and N. Tsuzu ki. [Art88a] J. Arthur, The invariant trace fo...

1988
[2019]

Caraiani, Local-global compatibility and the action of monodromy on n earby cycles, Duke Math

[Car12] A. Caraiani, Local-global compatibility and the action of monodromy on n earby cycles, Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), no. 12, 2311–2413. [CG18] F. Calegari and D. Geraghty, Modularity lifting beyond the taylor-wiles method , Invent. Math. 211 (2018), no. 1, 297–433. [CGH+18...

2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Potential automorphy over CM fields

[ACC+18] P. Allen, F. Calegari, A. Caraiani, T. Gee, D. Helm, B. V. L e Hung, J. New- ton, P. Scholze, R. Taylor, and J. Thorne, Potential automorphy over CM ﬁelds , arXiv:1812.09999,

work page Pith review arXiv

[2] [6]

Chenevier and M

[CH13] G. Chenevier and M. Harris, Construction of automorphic Galois representations, II , Camb. J. Math. 1 (2013), no. 1, 53–73. [CS17] A. Caraiani and P. Scholze, On the generic part of the cohomology of compact unitary Shimura varieties , Ann. of Math. (2) 186 (2017), no. 3, 649–766. [Far15] L. Fargues, G-torseurs en théorie de Hodge p-adique, http://...

work page 2013

[3] [7]

Franke, Harmonic analysis in weighted L2-spaces, Ann

[Fra98] J. Franke, Harmonic analysis in weighted L2-spaces, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 31 (1998), no. 2, 181–279. [GK19] W. Goldring and J.-S. Koskivirta, Strata Hasse invariants, Hecke algebras and Galois representations, Inventiones mathematicae 217 (2019), no. 3, 887–984. [Ham15] P. Hamacher, The geometry of Newton strata in the reduction modulo p ...

work page 1998

[4] [8]

Harris and R

[HT01] M. Harris and R. Taylor, The geometry and cohomology of some simple Shimura vari- eties, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 151, Princeton Univer sity Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001, With an appendix by Vladimir G. Berkovich. [Hub96] R. Huber, Étale cohomology of rigid analytic varieties and adic space s, Aspects of Mathematics, E30, Friedr. Vieweg & ...

work page 2001

[5] [9]

Illusie, Déformations de groupes de Barsotti-Tate (d’après A

[Ill85] L. Illusie, Déformations de groupes de Barsotti-Tate (d’après A. Grothe ndieck), Astérisque (1985), no. 127, 151–198, Seminar on arithmetic bundles: the Mordell conjecture (Paris, 1983/84). [Ill94] , Autour du théorème de monodromie locale , Astérisque (1994), no. 223, 9–57, Périodes p-adiques (Bures-sur-Yvette, 1988). [Kat81] N. Katz, Serre-Tate ...

work page 1985

[6] [18]

Scholze and J

[SW13] P. Scholze and J. W einstein, Moduli of p-divisible groups , Camb. J. Math. 1 (2013), no. 2, 145–237. [SW19] , Berkeley lectures on p-adic geometry, http://www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/scholze/Berkeley.pdf,

work page 2013

[7] [19]

[Swa80] R. G. Swan, On seminormality , J. Algebra 67 (1980), 210–229. [Var14] I. Varma, Local-global compatibility for regular algebraic cuspida l automorphic repre- sentation when ℓ⁄= p, ArXiv e-prints (2014). [W ed99] T. W edhorn, Ordinariness in good reductions of Shimura varieties of PEL -type, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 32 (1999), no. 5, 575–618....

work page 1980

[8] [88]

Oort, Foliations in moduli spaces of abelian varieties , J

[Oor04] F. Oort, Foliations in moduli spaces of abelian varieties , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (2004), no. 2, 267–296 (electronic). [OZ02] F. Oort and T. Zink, Families of p-divisible groups with constant Newton polygon , Doc. Math. 7 (2002), 183–201 (electronic). [Pin92] R. Pink, On l-adic sheaves on Shimura varieties and their higher direct i mages in the B...

work page 2004