pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.22034 · v2 · pith:XCIMGHJLnew · submitted 2026-02-25 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Chirped Pulse Analysis and Control in Non-Hermitian Scattering Systems using Complex Time Delay

Isabella L. Giovannelli , Steven M. Anlage , Thomas M. Antonsen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 12:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords non-Hermitian scatteringcomplex time delaychirped pulsesWigner-Smith time delaypulse propagationtime shiftfrequency shiftresonant scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Complex time delay in non-Hermitian scattering systems sets the time shift and center frequency shift of linearly chirped pulses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a direct connection between the propagation of linearly chirped pulses through linear and dispersive reverberant non-Hermitian scattering systems and the complex generalization of the Wigner-Smith time delay. It demonstrates that the pulse time shift depends on both the real and imaginary parts of this complex delay, while the center frequency shift scales directly with the imaginary part. The authors then apply these relationships to show how complex time delay can be used to tune a resonant scattering system so that near-zero time shift occurs across a wide range of pulse center frequencies. A reader would care because this turns an abstract scattering property into a practical control knob for pulse timing and spectrum without external modulators or filters.

Core claim

In linear and dispersive reverberant non-Hermitian scattering systems the time shift of a transmitted or reflected linearly chirped pulse depends on both the real and imaginary parts of the complex Wigner-Smith time delay, and the pulse center frequency shifts in direct proportion to the imaginary component. This link is used to demonstrate systematic tuning that produces near-zero time shift for a wide range of pulse center frequencies in a resonant scattering system.

What carries the argument

The complex generalization of the Wigner-Smith time delay, which quantifies how the scattering system advances or retards the pulse while also altering its amplitude through gain or loss.

If this is right

  • Time shift of a chirped pulse receives additive contributions from the real and imaginary parts of the complex time delay.
  • Center frequency of the chirped pulse shifts proportionally to the imaginary part of the complex time delay.
  • Near-zero time shift becomes achievable over a broad range of center frequencies by choosing resonant-system parameters that set the complex time delay appropriately.
  • The same relationships hold for both transmitted and reflected pulses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mapping could be used to design scattering systems that perform dispersion compensation or pulse reshaping for arbitrary chirp rates.
  • Complex time delay might serve as a single-parameter design variable for passive pulse control in microwave or optical networks that already contain gain and loss.
  • Extensions to pulsed signals with different temporal envelopes would test how general the reported connection remains beyond linear chirps.

Load-bearing premise

The complex Wigner-Smith time delay directly governs the time and frequency shifts of linearly chirped pulses without extra corrections from higher-order dispersion or system-specific effects.

What would settle it

Measure the actual arrival-time shift and center-frequency shift of a known chirped pulse after transmission or reflection through a calibrated non-Hermitian resonator and check whether both shifts match the values predicted from the system's independently measured complex time delay at the pulse center frequency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.22034 by Isabella L. Giovannelli, Steven M. Anlage, Thomas M. Antonsen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of time domain experiment setup. The ring resonator depicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Examples of the normalized chirped pulses sent through the resonator depicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Summary of measured and expected time delays and frequency shifts for chirped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Schematic of reflection resonator. (b) The red and dark purple solid curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Results for the case where the chirped-pulse temporal shift is canceled by setting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: This is a plot of eqn. 24 versus chirp rate (Ω′ ) for several fixed chirped pulse frequency bandwidth values of 2 MHz (in blue), 5 MHz (in red), and 10 MHz (in green). The end points on each curve correspond to the maximum possible chirp value for a given frequency bandwidth. The frequency bandwidth of the chirped pulse (in Hz) is defined as, 𝛿 𝑓 = 1 𝜋 √︃ 2ln2(Ω′2𝛿 2 𝑡 + 𝛿 −2 𝑡 ) (22) Rearranging this equa… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a-b) Additional chirped pulse reflection data comparing the predicted center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Additional 𝐷𝑡 = 0 data where larger frequency bandwidth pulses are used. Panels (a) and (b) are the results for transmission and reflection, respectively. The green triangles correspond to the measured pulse transmission time (right axis). The light orange circles correspond to 𝐷𝑡 /𝛿𝑡 (left axis). The real and imaginary parts of transmission (a) and reflection (b) time delay are plotted in red and dark pur… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Additional chirped pulse reflection data showing the full data set of Fig. 5(b) in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Time and frequency error analysis for the case where the input pulse has a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Time and frequency error analysis for the case where the input pulse has a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Standard deviation of the time shift represented by the histograms in (a-c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We theoretically and experimentally establish a connection between linearly chirped pulse propagation properties and the complex generalization of Wigner-Smith time delay for both transmitted and reflected pulses in linear and dispersive reverberant non-Hermitian scattering systems. We demonstrate that the time shift of the chirped pulse depends on both the real and imaginary parts of the complex time delay of the scattering system. We also show that the chirped pulse experiences a center frequency shift that is directly proportional to the imaginary component of complex time delay, similar to that found in Giovannelli and Anlage (2025). Using these insights, we then demonstrate how complex time delay can be harnessed to systematically tune the propagation properties of a chirped pulse such that a near-zero time shift can be achieved for a wide range of pulse center frequencies in a resonant scattering system. Overall, this work broadens the utility and establishes the physical significance of complex time delays in non-Hermitian settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to theoretically and experimentally establish a connection between the propagation properties of linearly chirped pulses (time shift and center-frequency shift) and the complex generalization of the Wigner-Smith time delay in linear, dispersive, reverberant non-Hermitian scattering systems. It asserts that the time shift depends on both real and imaginary parts of the complex delay, that the center-frequency shift is directly proportional to the imaginary part, and that this relation can be harnessed to achieve near-zero time shift over a wide range of pulse center frequencies via systematic tuning in a resonant system.

Significance. If the central mapping holds, the work extends the physical interpretation of complex time delay beyond its prior definition and demonstrates a practical control method for chirped-pulse propagation in non-Hermitian scattering. The combination of theory with experiment and the explicit tuning demonstration would strengthen the utility of complex delay as a design tool in optics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (chirped-pulse relations): The central claim that the complex Wigner-Smith time delay directly governs both the group delay and center-frequency shift of a linearly chirped pulse rests on the assumption that higher-order frequency dependence (dispersion curvature and non-Hermitian resonance effects) is negligible over the pulse bandwidth. The manuscript does not quantify the bandwidth or chirp-rate regime in which the first-order mapping remains accurate; any deviation would require additional correction terms not captured by the complex delay alone. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed connection and the subsequent control demonstration.
  2. [§4] §4 (experimental results): The experimental support for the time-shift and frequency-shift relations is asserted but lacks explicit reporting of data-exclusion criteria, error propagation from the complex-delay extraction, and quantitative comparison of measured shifts against the predicted first-order expressions. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the observed agreement confirms the mapping or is consistent with fitting within the same framework.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the chirp rate and bandwidth used in each panel to allow readers to judge the validity regime of the first-order approximation.
  2. [Theory] A brief comparison table or plot of the neglected second-order terms (e.g., d²φ/dω² evaluated at resonance) versus the retained complex-delay terms would clarify the approximation limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We have revised the manuscript to address the concerns about the validity regime of the first-order mapping and the completeness of the experimental reporting. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (chirped-pulse relations): The central claim that the complex Wigner-Smith time delay directly governs both the group delay and center-frequency shift of a linearly chirped pulse rests on the assumption that higher-order frequency dependence (dispersion curvature and non-Hermitian resonance effects) is negligible over the pulse bandwidth. The manuscript does not quantify the bandwidth or chirp-rate regime in which the first-order mapping remains accurate; any deviation would require additional correction terms not captured by the complex delay alone. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed connection and the subsequent control demonstration.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantification of the validity regime strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in §3 that derives the conditions under which higher-order terms remain negligible. For pulse bandwidths ≪ resonance linewidth and chirp rates satisfying |α| ≪ 1/τ_res (where τ_res is the resonance lifetime extracted from the complex delay), the first-order expressions for time and frequency shift incur <5 % error, as confirmed by both analytic expansion and numerical propagation simulations shown in a new supplementary figure. These bounds are consistent with the experimental parameters used in §4 and with the resonant-system tuning demonstration. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (experimental results): The experimental support for the time-shift and frequency-shift relations is asserted but lacks explicit reporting of data-exclusion criteria, error propagation from the complex-delay extraction, and quantitative comparison of measured shifts against the predicted first-order expressions. Without these, it is difficult to assess whether the observed agreement confirms the mapping or is consistent with fitting within the same framework.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting these reporting gaps. The revised §4 now includes: (i) explicit data-exclusion criteria (SNR > 12 dB and pulse-shape fidelity > 0.85); (ii) a step-by-step description of error propagation from the complex-delay extraction (Monte-Carlo sampling of S-parameter noise) to the predicted shifts; and (iii) a new table that lists measured versus predicted time and frequency shifts together with absolute deviations and 1-σ uncertainties for all ten center-frequency settings. These additions allow direct quantitative assessment of the first-order mapping. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Center-frequency shift of chirped pulse stated as similar to self-cited prior result on complex time delay

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "We also show that the chirped pulse experiences a center frequency shift that is directly proportional to the imaginary component of complex time delay, similar to that found in Giovannelli and Anlage (2025)."

    The stated proportionality for center frequency shift is not re-derived from first principles in this manuscript but is instead referenced as similar to a prior result whose authors overlap with the current paper, making that specific prediction dependent on the self-cited definition rather than independently established here.

full rationale

The paper derives new relations for time shift depending on both real and imaginary parts of complex time delay and demonstrates control for near-zero shift. However, the center-frequency shift proportionality is explicitly tied to a 2025 result by two of the present authors. This creates moderate load-bearing self-citation for one key claim, while the overall theoretical derivation from scattering properties and experimental validation remain independent. No self-definitional loops or fitted inputs renamed as predictions are exhibited in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the prior definition of complex time delay and the modeling choice that the studied systems are linear, dispersive, and reverberant non-Hermitian scatterers; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Scattering systems under study are linear and dispersive reverberant non-Hermitian.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the physical setting for both theoretical and experimental parts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5703 in / 1291 out tokens · 87270 ms · 2026-05-21T12:02:18.916477+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Physical interpretation of imaginary time delay,

    I. L. Giovannelli and S. M. Anlage, “Physical interpretation of imaginary time delay,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 043801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Compressionofamplifiedchirpedopticalpulses,

    D.StricklandandG.Mourou,“Compressionofamplifiedchirpedopticalpulses,”Opt.Commun.56,219–221(1985)

    work page 1985

  3. [3]

    Quantum-inspired interferometry with chirped laser pulses,

    R. Kaltenbaek, J. Lavoie, D. N. Biggerstaff, and K. J. Resch, “Quantum-inspired interferometry with chirped laser pulses,” Nat. Phys.4, 864–868 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Enhanced-resolution chirped-pulse interferometry,

    M. M. Bérubé, M. D. Mazurek, and K. J. Resch, “Enhanced-resolution chirped-pulse interferometry,” Phys. Rev. A 112, 023525 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Perspective: The first ten years of broadband chirped pulse fourier transform microwave spectroscopy,

    G. B. Park and R. W. Field, “Perspective: The first ten years of broadband chirped pulse fourier transform microwave spectroscopy,” The J. Chem. Phys.144, 200901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Performance of a 1319 nm laser radar using RF pulse compression,

    C. Allen, Y. Cobanoglu, Sekken Kenny Chong, and S. Gogineni, “Performance of a 1319 nm laser radar using RF pulse compression,” IGARSS 2001. Scanning Present. Resolv. Futur. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 Int. Geosci. Remote. Sens. Symp. (Cat. No.01CH37217)3, 997–999 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Chirped Lidar Using Simplified Homodyne Detection,

    P. Adany, C. Allen, and R. Hui, “Chirped Lidar Using Simplified Homodyne Detection,” J. Light. Technol.27, 3351–3357 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Processing advantages of linear chirped fiber Bragg gratings in the time domain realization of optical frequency-domain reflectometry,

    R. E. Saperstein, N. Alic, S. Zamek,et al., “Processing advantages of linear chirped fiber Bragg gratings in the time domain realization of optical frequency-domain reflectometry,” Opt. Express15, 15464 (2007)

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Simultaneous ranging and velocimetry of fast moving targets using oppositely chirped pulses from a mode-locked laser,

    M. U. Piracha, D. Nguyen, I. Ozdur, and P. J. Delfyett, “Simultaneous ranging and velocimetry of fast moving targets using oppositely chirped pulses from a mode-locked laser,” Opt. Express19, 11213 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    U.S. Patent No. 2,678,997,

    S. Darlington, “U.S. Patent No. 2,678,997,” (1954)

    work page 1954

  11. [11]

    The Theory and Design of Chirp Radars,

    J. R. Klauder, A. C. Price, S. Darlington, and W. J. Albersheim, “The Theory and Design of Chirp Radars,” The Bell Syst. Tech. J.39, 745–808 (1960)

    work page 1960

  12. [12]

    All-normal-dispersion femtosecond fiber laser,

    A. Chong, J. Buckley, W. Renninger, and F. Wise, “All-normal-dispersion femtosecond fiber laser,” Opt. Express14, 10095–10100 (2006)

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    High-energy femtosecond fiber lasers based on pulse propagation at normal dispersion,

    F. Wise, A. Chong, and W. Renninger, “High-energy femtosecond fiber lasers based on pulse propagation at normal dispersion,” Laser & Photonics Rev.2, 58–73 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Sculpturing spatiotemporal wavepackets with chirped pulses,

    Q. Cao, J. Chen, K. Lu,et al., “Sculpturing spatiotemporal wavepackets with chirped pulses,” Photonics Res.9, 2261–2264 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Focusingandcompressionofultrashortpulsesthroughscattering media,

    O.Katz,E.Small,Y.Bromberg,andY.Silberberg,“Focusingandcompressionofultrashortpulsesthroughscattering media,” Nat. Photonics5, 372–377 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Chirped pulse laser sources and applications,

    P. J. Delfyett, D. Mandridis, M. U. Piracha,et al., “Chirped pulse laser sources and applications,” Prog. Quantum Electron.36, 475–540 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Attoclock revisited on electron tunnelling time,

    C. Hofmann, A. S. Landsman, and U. Keller, “Attoclock revisited on electron tunnelling time,” J. Mod. Opt.66, 1052–1070 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Time-delay control of reversible electron spirals using arbitrarily chirped attosecond pulses,

    M. A. H. B. M. Yusoff and J. M. Ngoko Djiokap, “Time-delay control of reversible electron spirals using arbitrarily chirped attosecond pulses,” Phys. Rev. A109, 023107 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Attosecond lighthouses: How to use spatiotemporally coupled light fields to generate isolated attosecond pulses,

    H. Vincenti and F. Quéré, “Attosecond lighthouses: How to use spatiotemporally coupled light fields to generate isolated attosecond pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 113904 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Ultrafastgeometriccontrolofasinglequbitusingchirped pulses,

    P.E.Hawkins, S.A.Malinovskaya, andV.S.Malinovsky, “Ultrafastgeometriccontrolofasinglequbitusingchirped pulses,” Phys. ScriptaT147, 014013 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    High-fidelity robust qubit control by phase-modulated pulses,

    M. Kuzmanović, I. Björkman, J. J. McCord,et al., “High-fidelity robust qubit control by phase-modulated pulses,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013188 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Random-Access Quantum Memory Using Chirped Pulse Phase Encoding,

    J. O’Sullivan, O. W. Kennedy, K. Debnath,et al., “Random-Access Quantum Memory Using Chirped Pulse Phase Encoding,” Phys. Rev. X12, 041014 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Orthogonal chirp division multiplexing,

    X. Ouyang and J. Zhao, “Orthogonal chirp division multiplexing,” IEEE Trans. on Commun.64, 3946–3957 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Photonic generation and application of a bandwidth multiplied linearly chirped signal with phase modulation capability,

    X. Li, S. Zhao, G. Wang, and Y. Zhou, “Photonic generation and application of a bandwidth multiplied linearly chirped signal with phase modulation capability,” IEEE Access9, 82618–82629 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Chirped-pulse adiabatic control in coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering for imaging of biological structure and dynamics,

    S. A. Malinovskaya and V. S. Malinovsky, “Chirped-pulse adiabatic control in coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering for imaging of biological structure and dynamics,” Opt. Lett.32, 707 (2007)

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    Chirped pulse control methods for imaging of biological structure and dynamics,

    S. Malinovskaya, “Chirped pulse control methods for imaging of biological structure and dynamics,” Int. J. Quantum Chem.107, 3151–3158 (2007)

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Chirp-coded excitation imaging with a high-frequency ultrasound annular array,

    J. Mamou, J. A. Ketterling, and R. H. Silverman, “Chirp-coded excitation imaging with a high-frequency ultrasound annular array,” IEEE Trans. on Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control.55, 508–513 (2008)

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Compact diode laser source for multiphoton biological imaging,

    R. D. Niederriter, B. N. Ozbay, G. L. Futia,et al., “Compact diode laser source for multiphoton biological imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express8, 315–322 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Twenty-five years of optical coherence tomography: the paradigm shift in sensitivity and speed provided by fourier domain oct [invited],

    J. F. de Boer, R. Leitgeb, and M. Wojtkowski, “Twenty-five years of optical coherence tomography: the paradigm shift in sensitivity and speed provided by fourier domain oct [invited],” Biomed. Opt. Express8, 3248–3280 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Measuring the transmission matrix in optics: An approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media,

    S. M. Popoff, G. Lerosey, R. Carminati,et al., “Measuring the transmission matrix in optics: An approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media,” Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 100601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    Use of transmission and reflection complex time delays to reveal scattering matrix poles and zeros: Example of the ring graph,

    L. Chen and S. M. Anlage, “Use of transmission and reflection complex time delays to reveal scattering matrix poles and zeros: Example of the ring graph,” Phys. Rev. E105, 054210 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    The formal properties of nuclear collisions,

    L. Eisenbud, “The formal properties of nuclear collisions,” Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University (1948)

    work page 1948

  33. [33]

    Lower Limit for the Energy Derivative of the Scattering Phase Shift,

    E. P. Wigner, “Lower Limit for the Energy Derivative of the Scattering Phase Shift,” Phys. Rev.98, 145–147 (1955)

    work page 1955

  34. [34]

    Lifetime Matrix in Collision Theory,

    F. T. Smith, “Lifetime Matrix in Collision Theory,” Phys. Rev.118, 349–356 (1960)

    work page 1960

  35. [35]

    Generalization of wigner time delay to subunitary scattering systems,

    L. Chen, S. M. Anlage, and Y. V. Fyodorov, “Generalization of wigner time delay to subunitary scattering systems,” Phys. Rev. E103, L050203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Propagation of a Gaussian Light Pulse through an Anomalous Dispersion Medium,

    C. G. B. Garrett and D. E. McCumber, “Propagation of a Gaussian Light Pulse through an Anomalous Dispersion Medium,” Phys. Rev. A1, 305–313 (1970)

    work page 1970

  37. [37]

    Concept of Group Velocity in Resonant Pulse Propagation,

    M. D. Crisp, “Concept of Group Velocity in Resonant Pulse Propagation,” Phys. Rev. A4, 2104–2108 (1971)

    work page 1971

  38. [38]

    Linear Pulse Propagation in an Absorbing Medium,

    S. Chu and S. Wong, “Linear Pulse Propagation in an Absorbing Medium,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 738–741 (1982)

    work page 1982

  39. [39]

    Slow and fast light,

    R. W. Boyd and D. J. Gauthier, “Slow and fast light,” inProgress in Optics, E. Wolf Ed., (Elsevier Science, 2002)

    work page 2002

  40. [40]

    Observation of Backward Pulse Propagation Through a Medium with a Negative Group Velocity,

    G. M. Gehring, A. Schweinsberg, C. Barsi,etal., “Observation of Backward Pulse Propagation Through a Medium with a Negative Group Velocity,” Science312, 895–897 (2006)

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    Slow and fast light: basic concepts and recent advancements based on nonlinear wave-mixing processes,

    U. Bortolozzo, S. Residori, and J. P. P. Huignard, “Slow and fast light: basic concepts and recent advancements based on nonlinear wave-mixing processes,” Laser & Photonics Rev.4, 483–498 (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    The speed of information in a ‘fast-light’ optical medium,

    M. D. Stenner, D. J. Gauthier, and M. A. Neifeld, “The speed of information in a ‘fast-light’ optical medium,” Nature 425, 695–698 (2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [43]

    Concerning the alternating current resistance of coils,

    V. A. Sommerfeld, “Concerning the alternating current resistance of coils,” Physikalische Zeitschrift8, 805–809 (1907)

    work page 1907

  44. [44]

    Über die fortpflanzung des lichtes in dispergierenden medien (On the propagation of light in dispersive media),

    L. Brillouin, “Über die fortpflanzung des lichtes in dispergierenden medien (On the propagation of light in dispersive media),” Ann. Physik44, 203–240 (1914)

    work page 1914

  45. [45]

    Brillouin and A

    L. Brillouin and A. Sommerfeld,WavePropagationandGroupVelocity(Academic Press, 1960), chap. 2, pp. 17–39

    work page 1960

  46. [46]

    Experimental evidence that a photon can spend a negative amount of time in an atom cloud,

    D. Angulo, K. Thompson, V.-M. Nixon,etal., “Experimental evidence that a photon can spend a negative amount of time in an atom cloud,” (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    How much time does a photon spend as an atomic excitation before being transmitted through a cloud of atoms?

    K. Thompson, K. Li, D. Angulo,etal., “How much time does a photon spend as an atomic excitation before being transmitted through a cloud of atoms?” APL Quantum2, 036108 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Anomalous time delays and quantum weak measurements in optical micro-resonators,

    M. Asano, K. Y. Bliokh, Y. P. Bliokh,et al., “Anomalous time delays and quantum weak measurements in optical micro-resonators,” Nat. Commun.7, 13488 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Negative group delay and pulse compression in superluminal pulse propagation,

    H. Cao, A. Dogariu, and L. Wang, “Negative group delay and pulse compression in superluminal pulse propagation,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.9, 52–58 (2003)

    work page 2003

  50. [50]

    Scattering from a ring graph - a simple model for the study of resonances,

    D. Waltner and U. Smilansky, “Scattering from a ring graph - a simple model for the study of resonances,” Acta Phys. Polonica A124, 1087–1090 (2013). Chirped Pulse Analysis and Control in Non-Hermitian Scattering Systems using Complex Time Delay Supplementary Materials ISABELLAL. GIOVANNELLI, 1,* STEVENM. ANLAGE, 1 ANDTHOMASM. ANTONSEN 2 1Quantum Material...

    work page 2013