pith. sign in

arxiv: 1406.5134 · v1 · pith:XFIUQEWUnew · submitted 2014-06-19 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · physics.geo-ph· physics.ins-det

Stability comparison of two absolute gravimeters: optical versus atomic interferometers

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph physics.geo-phphysics.ins-det
keywords comparisonabsolutegravimetersatomicbetterdifferentluxembourgoptical
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:XFIUQEWU Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{XFIUQEWU}

Prints a linked pith:XFIUQEWU badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

We report the direct comparison between the stabilities of two mobile absolute gravimeters of different technology: the LNE-SYRTE Cold Atom Gravimeter and FG5X\#216 of the Universit\'e du Luxembourg. These instruments rely on two different principles of operation: atomic and optical interferometry. The comparison took place in the Walferdange Underground Laboratory for Geodynamics in Luxembourg, at the beginning of the last International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters, ICAG-2013. We analyse a 2h10 duration common measurement, and find that the CAG shows better immunity with respect to changes in the level of vibration noise, as well as a slightly better short term stability.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.