Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 166 references

Designing LLM-simulated Immersive Spaces to Enhance Autistic Children's Social Affordances Understanding

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that an LLM-simulated immersive street-crossing space can teach autistic children to read the social intentions behind driving behavior and thereby improve their understanding of social affordances in traffic.

desk verdict Promising system and design synthesis, but the RQ3 significance claim rests on an impossible test statistic; paired reanalysis and outcome validation are required. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03447 v1 pith:XFWPVBCP submitted 2025-02-05 cs.HC

Yancheng Cao , Yangyang HE , Yonglin Chen , Menghan Chen , Shanhe You , Yulin Qiu , Min Liu , Chuan Luo
show 4 more authors
Chen Zheng Xin Tong Jing Liang Jiangtao Gong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords autisticchildrensocialaffordancestrafficsafetyLLMsimulationimmersiveenvironmentstreetcrossinguserstudymultimodalinteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Autistic children often miss the social signals that make everyday spaces navigable, and in traffic this can be a safety problem. This paper tries to establish that an immersive, projection-based street-crossing environment—where a large language model simulates drivers with different social intentions—can improve those children's understanding of social affordances. To get there, the authors distill 17 design guidelines from a literature review, build the AIRoad system, and compare it against video tutorials in a within-subject study of 14 autistic children. They report that children responded faster to the safe crossing moment after AIRoad and were more engaged, while parents rated the system highly usable.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is AIRoad, a four-wall projection space in which a large language model orchestrates the traffic. The LLM generates driver intentions from four validated driving styles—dissociative, anxious, risky, and patient—and expresses each intention through visible behavior (vehicle speed, stopping, hand gestures) and a synthesized spoken narrative ('I'm not in a hurry' versus 'I was on the phone'). A memory module feeds the child's position and error history back to the LLM so that difficulty and scaffolding can be adjusted, and the star-collection crossing task gives children repeated, safe opportunities to act on the social signals they perceive. The mechanism presumed to produce learning is the repeated pairing of observable vehicle behavior with the driver's stated intention inside a predictable, child-friendly environment.

What would settle it

A replication using the same procedure but with safe windows rated independently by multiple coders (with inter-rater reliability reported) and by external traffic-safety criteria; if the AIRoad condition no longer shows a larger reaction-time decrease than the video condition, the central claim fails. A second way: give children in a control arm the video tutorial twice, matching AIRoad's session length; if their reaction-time delta equals AIRoad's -2.20 seconds, the effect is task familiarity, not social-affordance learning.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that AIRoad, the LLM-simulated immersive crossing, improves autistic children's comprehension of social affordances in traffic settings, and that this improvement shows up as faster and more accurate decisions about when to cross. In the video-based test, the mean change in reaction time after AIRoad was -2.20 seconds versus +0.18 seconds after video tutorials, a difference the authors report as statistically significant (Wilcoxon rank-sum, p<.05). In-game performance also improved over training (logistic regression, p=0.002), and parents gave AIRoad a mean System Usability Scale score of 85.71, in the 'excellent' range. The authors interpret the combination—faster cross decisions, better in-game safety, higher engagement, and positive valence—as evidence that children connected vehicle behavior to driver intention rather than just learning the game.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the video-based test, whose safe window was predetermined by three authors, actually measures social-affordance understanding, so that faster crossing decisions after AIRoad reflect better comprehension rather than practice with the test format.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, repeated practice in an LLM-simulated crossing can shorten autistic children's reaction time to the right moment to cross, relative to passive video watching.
  • Projection-based immersive training can keep autistic children engaged without requiring them to wear headsets, which many resist.
  • Parent-reported usability at or above 85 on the System Usability Scale makes the system a plausible candidate for real training settings.
  • The design guideline set (17 considerations in four categories) gives future builders a checklist for educational technology aimed at autistic children.
  • Because the LLM can generate new intentions and narratives, the same space can produce many crossing scenarios from fixed assets, supporting repeated practice with variety.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reaction-time improvement is measured on a bespoke video test whose safe window was set by three authors; an independent extension would check whether the effect survives inter-rater reliability and external traffic-safety definitions of 'safe.'
  • If the mechanism is behavior-intention pairing, the same architecture should transfer to other social-affordance settings, such as reading a teacher's or peer's intent in a classroom, without new hardware—a testable extension the paper does not run.
  • A cheaper, lower-latency model could be substituted for the LLM in a replication; if the learning effect persists, the pedagogical value lies in the simulation loop, not the specific model.
  • Eye-tracking suggests children shifted attention from traffic lights to vehicle behavior after training; a natural next test is whether that shift occasionally causes misjudgments when cars stop but are not yielding.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents AIRoad, an LLM-simulated immersive projection environment for autistic children, intended to improve their understanding of social affordances in traffic scenarios. The authors synthesize 17 design guidelines from 74 papers, build a street-crossing system with four LLM-generated driving styles and multimodal cues, and evaluate it in a within-subject study with 14 autistic children who also watched video tutorials. The reported results cover parent-rated usability (SUS), engagement and emotional coding from video, valence/arousal changes, in-game crossing accuracy, and reaction-time deltas in a video-based crossing test. The headline claim is that AIRoad significantly improves children's comprehension of social affordances, as reflected in faster post-training crossing responses.

Significance. If the main quantitative claim were supported, this would be a useful and reasonably novel contribution: it applies LLM-driven social simulation in an immersive projection environment for a clinical population, offers a structured set of design guidelines, explicitly audits LLM hallucination rates, and makes source code and prompts publicly available. The engagement findings and qualitative observations are promising, and the manual coding of engagement reports high inter-rater correlation. However, the central RQ3 result rests on an internally inconsistent statistical report and on an outcome measure whose construct validity is not established; the paper currently overstates what the data show. The design-guideline synthesis and system description retain value independently, but the empirical claim needs substantial repair.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.4.3, Fig. 10] The reported Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the Delta of Reaction Time comparison is arithmetically impossible. With 14 children in each condition, the largest possible rank-sum statistic is 301, yet the paper reports W = 2343, p < .05. Furthermore, the experiment is within-subject, so the appropriate analysis is a paired comparison (e.g., Wilcoxon signed-rank on per-child deltas). As reported, the p-value cannot be trusted and the conclusion that AIRoad significantly improves social-affordance understanding is unsupported. Please provide the correct paired analysis from the per-child data, and clarify whether the reported W came from trial-level pseudoreplication or a typographical error.
  2. [§5.3, Measurement, item (1)] The video-based outcome measure has unestablished construct validity. The 'safe period' ground truth was set by three authors with no inter-rater reliability or external validation, and reaction time is defined only for crossings that fall inside that window. The observed pre-post RT delta could reflect increased familiarity with the test videos, a more liberal crossing criterion, or task adaptation rather than improved understanding of social affordances. The authors should report per-child paired reaction-time data, examine whether the crossing-decision rate changed across conditions, and validate the safe-period labels with independent raters or an explicit traffic-rule criterion. This issue is load-bearing because RQ3's central claim depends entirely on this measure.
  3. [§6.3, Fig. 11] The claim that eye-tracking data show children redistribute attention toward vehicles after AIRoad training is not evaluable. No eye-tracking apparatus, recording setup, calibration procedure, sampling rate, or quantitative analysis is described anywhere in the Methods; only a two-panel illustrative case is shown. Please either add the missing measurement details and statistical summaries, or temper the claim to what the video observations can actually support.
  4. [§5.4.2, Table 4] The activity-participation t-test results contain internally inconsistent descriptive statistics. For both 'Engrossing' and 'Distracting', the AIRoad SD is reported as 2.980 and the Video SD as 18.478, and the two variables have identical absolute t values. This pattern is implausible for two distinct behavioral measures and suggests a reporting or data-handling error. Since the RQ2 engagement conclusion is based on these tests, the authors must verify the descriptive statistics and rerun the paired comparisons, ideally with effect sizes.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] There are frequent typographical errors, including 'autitstic', 'pantcipants' in Fig. 8, 'A void' in guideline 17, and 'For DG6' in §4.3.2, which should be corrected in a thorough copyedit.
  2. [§6.1] The sentence 'LLMs have shown utility beyond common applications, as this study explores their potential in special education for autistic children' appears twice in consecutive paragraphs and should be de-duplicated.
  3. [Table 1] Several reference lists contain duplicate entries, such as [78,78], [34,34], [49,49], [108,108], and [137,137]; these should be cleaned.
  4. [§5.4.2] The 'Fisher test' used for the Valence and Arousal Scale is not specified: it is unclear what factors or hypotheses were tested, and the p-values (.353 / .149) are reported without a test statistic. Please clarify the statistical procedure.
  5. [§5.4.1] The logistic regression analysis of in-game crossing accuracy is described only by a p-value; no model coefficients, standard errors, or goodness-of-fit measures are reported, and the authors themselves note that familiarity with the game is a plausible alternative explanation.
  6. [§5.3 and Reference [35]] The citation used to support the video-coding methodology is to Conti et al. on distributed data source verification, which appears unrelated; the reference should be checked and replaced with the actual source for the engagement coding scheme.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main RQ3 outcome is an external video-based test whose safe-period ground truth is independent of the AIRoad system's fitted parameters and logs.

full rationale

The central claim (RQ3) is not circular: the outcome measure is the Delta of Reaction Time in an external video-based test, with safe periods predetermined by the authors from traffic-light signals and passing vehicles, independent of the AIRoad training parameters, LLM prompts, or in-game fitted behavior. The paper does not fit a parameter to a subset of the outcome and then predict a closely related quantity; the in-game log analysis is reported separately and is explicitly acknowledged as potentially reflecting game familiarity rather than social-affordance understanding. The engagement coding scheme is borrowed from prior works by overlapping authors (Gong et al. [48] and Wu et al. [148]), but it is used only for RQ2 and is applied as a published rubric rather than being constructed from the current system's outputs, so it does not force the RQ3 result. The internally impossible Wilcoxon statistic and the construct validity of the safe-period ground truth are statistical and measurement concerns, not cases of definitional equivalence or fitted-input-as-prediction. No equation in the paper reduces to its own inputs, no load-bearing premise rests solely on a self-citation chain, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The design considerations are synthesized from an external literature review rather than derived from the system's own outputs. Therefore no circular steps are identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data in the scientific claim; the manually calibrated tracker coefficients (n and b) in Section 4.4.2 are implementation details. Four domain assumptions are load-bearing, especially the validity of the video-based outcome measure and the participant-identification procedure.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Crossing within a predetermined safe period in the video test is a valid measure of social-affordance understanding.
    Section 5.3, Measurement (1): three authors predetermined safe periods for each video; no inter-rater reliability or external validation is reported.
  • domain assumption The four driving styles from Taubman-Ben-Ari et al. [132] map meaningfully onto distinct social affordances for training.
    Section 4.1 uses dissociative, anxious, risky, and patient driving styles as the basis for generating intentions; this mapping is asserted without empirical support in this context.
  • domain assumption Visual cues, gestures, and LLM-generated narratives convey the intended driver intentions to autistic children.
    Section 4.2 describes how speed, gestures, and audio are combined; the system assumes children can learn from these multimodal signals as designed.
  • domain assumption Participant ASD status is accurately identified through recruitment procedures.
    Section 5.1: only 5 of 14 participants came via a special education institution; for 9, parents provided self-reports and ABC, with no independent clinical diagnosis required for all.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Designing LLM-simulated Immersive Spaces to Enhance Autistic Children's Social Affordances Understanding." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XFWPVBCP

@misc{pith2026250203447,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Designing LLM-simulated Immersive Spaces to Enhance Autistic Children's Social Affordances Understanding},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XFWPVBCP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03447}
}
read the original abstract

One of the key challenges faced by autistic children is understanding social affordances in complex environments, which further impacts their ability to respond appropriately to social signals. In traffic scenarios, this impairment can even lead to safety concerns. In this paper, we introduce an LLM-simulated immersive projection environment designed to improve this ability in autistic children while ensuring their safety. We first propose 17 design considerations across four major categories, derived from a comprehensive review of previous research. Next, we developed a system called AIroad, which leverages LLMs to simulate drivers with varying social intents, expressed through explicit multimodal social signals. AIroad helps autistic children bridge the gap in recognizing the intentions behind behaviors and learning appropriate responses through various stimuli. A user study involving 14 participants demonstrated that this technology effectively engages autistic children and leads to significant improvements in their comprehension of social affordances in traffic scenarios. Additionally, parents reported high perceived usability of the system. These findings highlight the potential of combining LLM technology with immersive environments for the functional rehabilitation of autistic children in the future.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03447 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The literature screening procedure in this study in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. System framework of AIRoad. The social affordance simulation conducted by the LLM is detailed in the social [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. AIRoad is an AI-enabled immersive educational space tailored for autistic children. It facilitates autistic children’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Projection on the ground; b) Projection on the wall; c) Overall real-life overview; d) Other cartoon elements; e) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The experimental procedure of the study [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) Children are participating in a video-based experiment; b) Completing a quiz on social affordance. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The procedure of immersive space exploring: a) Children observe their surroundings in AIRoad; b) Upon first seeing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The relationship between the rate of pantcipants [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The result of Valence and Arousal Scale. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Reaction Time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Case on the Changes in Eye Movement Before and After Training with AIRoad. a) Eye movement case before AIRoad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

166 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Frances E Aboud and Maria Amato. 2003. Developmental and socialization influences on intergroup bias.Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (2003), 65–85

    2003

  2. [2]

    Ali Adjorlu and Stefania Serafin. 2020. Co-designing a head-mounted display based virtual reality game to teach street-crossing skills to children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. In Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation: 8th EAI International Conference, ArtsIT 2019, and 4th EAI Interna- tional Conference, DLI 2019, Aalbo...

    2020

  3. [3]

    Camila Alvarado, Roberto Munoz, Rodolfo Villarroel, Oscar Acuña, Thiago S Barcelos, and Carlos Becerra. 2017. ValpoDijo: Developing a software that sup- ports the teaching of chilean idioms to children with autism spectrum disorders. In 2017 Twelfth Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO) . IEEE, 1–4

    2017

  4. [4]

    Stamatina Anastopoulou. 2004. Investigating multimodal interactions for the de- sign of learning environments: a case study in science learning. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Birmingham

    2004

  5. [5]

    Anthony Attwood, Uta Frith, and Beate Hermelin. 1988. The understanding and use of interpersonal gestures by autistic and Down’s syndrome children. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 18, 2 (1988), 241–257

    1988

  6. [6]

    Tony Attwood. 2000. Strategies for improving the social integration of children with Asperger syndrome. Autism 4, 1 (2000), 85–100

    2000

  7. [7]

    Aaron Bangor, Philip T Kortum, and James T Miller. 2008. An empirical evalua- tion of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 24, 6 (2008), 574–594

    2008

  8. [8]

    Mary Barry and Ian Pitt. 2006. Interaction design: a multidimensional approach for learners with autism. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Interaction design and children. 33–36

    2006

Show all 166 references
  1. [9]

    Laura Bartoli, Franca Garzotto, Mirko Gelsomini, Luigi Oliveto, and Matteo Valoriani. 2014. Designing and evaluating touchless playful interaction for ASD children. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children . 17–26

    2014

  2. [10]

    Renae Beaumont and Kate Sofronoff. 2013. multimodal intervention for social skills Training in students with high-functioning asd. CBT for children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders (2013), 173

    2013

  3. [11]

    Rongqi Bei, Yajie Liu, Yihe Wang, Yuxuan Huang, Ming Li, Yuhang Zhao, and Xin Tong. 2024. StarRescue: the Design and Evaluation of A Turn-Taking Col- laborative Game for Facilitating Autistic Children’s Social Skills. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Co...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Esubalew Bekele, Joshua Wade, Dayi Bian, Jing Fan, Amy Swanson, Zachary Warren, and Nilanjan Sarkar. 2016. Multimodal adaptive social interaction in virtual environment (MASI-VR) for children with Autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In 2016 IEEE virtual reality (VR) . IEEE, 121–130

    2016

  5. [13]

    Scott Bellini, Jessica K Peters, Lauren Benner, and Andrea Hopf. 2007. A meta- analysis of school-based social skills interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education 28, 3 (2007), 153–162

    2007

  6. [14]

    Sara Bernardini, Kaśka Porayska-Pomsta, and Tim J Smith. 2014. ECHOES: An intelligent serious game for fostering social communication in children with autism. Information Sciences 264 (2014), 41–60

    2014

  7. [15]

    Lal Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Srinivas Katkoori, and Redwan Alqasemi. 2017. A survey on virtual reality for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: design considerations. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies11, 2 (2017), 133–151. IUI ’25, March 24–27, 2025, Cagliari, I...

    2017

  8. [16]

    Nancy C Brady, Holly L Storkel, Paige Bushnell, R Michael Barker, Kate Saun- ders, Debby Daniels, and Kandace Fleming. 2015. Investigating a multimodal intervention for children with limited expressive vocabularies associated with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pa...

    2015

  9. [17]

    John Brooke et al . 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4–7

    1996

  10. [18]

    Patricia J Brooks and Bertram O Ploog. 2013. Attention to emotional tone of voice in speech perception in children with autism.Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 7, 7 (2013), 845–857

    2013

  11. [19]

    Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffr...

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Grigore C Burdea and Philippe Coiffet. 2003. Virtual reality technology. John Wiley & Sons

    2003

  13. [21]

    Yu Cai, Zhao Liu, Zhuo Yang, Yilan Tan, Junwei Zhang, and Shuo Tang. 2023. Starrypia: An AR Gamified Music Adjuvant Treatment Application for Children with Autism Based on Combined Therapy. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technolo...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Brianna E Cairney, Stanley H West, Eileen Haebig, Christopher R Cox, and Heather D Lucas. 2023. Interpretations of meaningful and ambiguous hand gestures in autistic and non-autistic adults: A norming study. Behavior Research Methods (2023), 1–14

    2023

  15. [23]

    Murilo C Camargo, Rodolfo M Barros, Jacques D Brancher, Vanessa TO Barros, and Matheus Santana. 2019. Designing gamified interventions for autism spec- trum disorder: a systematic review. In Entertainment Computing and Serious Games: First IFIP TC 14 Joint International Confer...

    2019

  16. [24]

    Alice S Carter, Naomi Ornstein Davis, Ami Klin, and Fred R Volkmar. 2005. Social development in autism. Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders 1 (2005), 312–334

    2005

  17. [25]

    Erik W Carter, Eric A Common, Melissa A Sreckovic, Heartley B Huber, Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Jenny Redding Gustafson, Jessica Dykstra, and Kara Hume

  18. [26]

    Giorgio Celani, Marco Walter Battacchi, and Letizia Arcidiacono. 1999. The understanding of the emotional meaning of facial expressions in people with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 29 (1999), 57–66

    1999

  19. [27]

    Ismail Celik, Muhterem Dindar, Hanni Muukkonen, and Sanna Järvelä. 2022. The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends 66, 4 (01 Jul 2022), 616–630. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11528-022-00715-y

    2022

  20. [28]

    Inha Cha, Sung-In Kim, Hwajung Hong, Heejeong Yoo, and Youn-kyung Lim

  21. [29]

    Brandt Chamberlain, Connie Kasari, and Erin Rotheram-Fuller. 2007. Involve- ment or isolation? The social networks of children with autism in regular classrooms. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 37 (2007), 230–242

    2007

  22. [30]

    Konstantina Chatzara, Charalampos Karagiannidis, Sofia Mavropoulou, and Dimos Stamatis. 2014. Digital storytelling for children with autism: software development and pilot application. InResearch on e-learning and ICT in education: Technological, pedagogical and instructional ...

    2014

  23. [31]

    Ya-Yun Chen, Mirko Uljarevic, Joshua Neal, Steven Greening, Hyungwook Yim, and Tae-Ho Lee. 2022. Excessive functional coupling with less variability between salience and default mode networks in autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroi...

    2022

  24. [32]

    Yufang Cheng, Cheng-Li Huang, and Chung-Sung Yang. 2015. Using a 3D immersive virtual environment system to enhance social understanding and social skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 30, 4 (2015), 222–236

    2015

  25. [33]

    Yujin Cho, Mingeon Kim, Seojin Kim, Oyun Kwon, Ryan Donghan Kwon, Yoonha Lee, and Dohyun Lim. 2023. Evaluating the efficacy of interactive language therapy based on llm for high-functioning autistic adolescent psychological counseling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09243 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Lennard Chua, Jeremy Goh, Zin Tun Nay, Lihui Huang, Yiyu Cai, and Ruby Seah

  27. [35]

    Mancini, and Alessandro Mei

    Mauro Conti, Roberto Di Pietro, Luigi V. Mancini, and Alessandro Mei. 2009. (old) Distributed data source verification in wireless sensor networks.Inf. Fusion 10, 4 (2009), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2009.01.002

    2009 doi

  28. [36]

    Giulia Cosentino, Mirko Gelsomini, and Michail Giannakos. 2023. MOVES: Going beyond hardwired multisensory environments for children. InProceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference . 716–720

    2023

  29. [37]

    Allison E Curry, Kristina B Metzger, Meghan E Carey, Emma B Sartin, Patty Huang, and Benjamin E Yerys. 2021. Comparison of motor vehicle crashes, traffic violations, and license suspensions between autistic and non-autistic adolescent and young adult drivers. Journal of the Am...

    2021

  30. [38]

    Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2000. Design issues on interactive environments for children with autism. In In: Procs of ICDVRAT 2000, the 3rd Int Conf on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies . University of Reading

    2000

  31. [39]

    Megan Davis, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Stuart Powell, and Chrystopher Nehaniv

  32. [40]

    Vanessa Tavares de Oliveira Barros, Cristiane Affonso de Almeida Zerbetto, Kátia Tavares Meserlian, Rodolfo Barros, Murilo Crivellari Camargo, and Táthia Cristina Passos de Carvalho. 2014. DayByDay: Interactive and customizable use of mobile technology in the cognitive develop...

    2014

  33. [41]

    Marc Fabri and David Moore. 2005. The use of emotionally expressive avatars in collaborative virtual environments. Virtual Social Agents 88, April (2005), 88–94

    2005

  34. [42]

    Torbjörn Falkmer, Anna Anund, Gunilla Sörensen, and Marita Falkmer. 2004. The transport mobility situation for children with autism spectrum disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 11, 2 (2004), 90–100

    2004

  35. [43]

    Megan Freeth, Tom Foulsham, and Alan Kingstone. 2013. What affects social attention? Social presence, eye contact and autistic traits. PloS one 8, 1 (2013), e53286

    2013

  36. [44]

    Uta Frith. 1994. Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Social development 3, 2 (1994), 108–124

    1994

  37. [45]

    Chen Gao, Xiaochong Lan, Zhihong Lu, Jinzhu Mao, Jinghua Piao, Huandong Wang, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. 2023. S3: Social-network Simulation System with Large Language Model-Empowered Agents. arXiv:2307.14984 [cs.SI]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    James J Gibson. 1977. The theory of affordances. Hilldale, USA 1, 2 (1977), 67–82

    1977

  39. [47]

    Tina R Goldsmith. 2008. Using virtual reality enhanced behavioral skills training to teach street-crossing skills to children and adolescents with Autism Sectrum Disorders. Western Michigan University

    2008

  40. [48]

    Jiangtao Gong, Teng Han, Siling Guo, Jiannan Li, Siyu Zha, Liuxin Zhang, Feng Tian, Qianying Wang, and Yong Rui. 2021. Holoboard: A large-format immersive teaching board based on pseudo holographics. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology . 441–456

    2021

  41. [49]

    Marine Grandgeorge and Nobuo Masataka. 2016. Atypical color preference in children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in psychology 7 (2016), 227653

    2016

  42. [50]

    Temple Grandin. 2002. 28 Teaching Tips for Children and Adults with Autism. (2002)

    2002

  43. [51]

    Ouriel Grynszpan, Patrice L Weiss, Fernando Perez-Diaz, and Eynat Gal. 2014. Innovative technology-based interventions for autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. Autism 18, 4 (2014), 346–361

    2014

  44. [52]

    Ge Guo and Zhiwen Qiu. 2024. DentAR: Innovating Dental Visits with Sensory Experiences in AR for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–7

    2024

  45. [53]

    Osama Halabi, Samir A Elseoud, Jihad M Alja’am, Hena Alpona, Moza Al- Hemadi, and Dabia Al-Hassan. 2017. Immersive virtual reality in improving communication skills in children with autism. (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Joanna Hale, Jamie A Ward, Francesco Buccheri, Dominic Oliver, and Antonia F de C Hamilton. 2020. Are you on my wavelength? Interpersonal coordination in dyadic conversations. Journal of nonverbal behavior 44 (2020), 63–83

    2020

  47. [55]

    Annika Hellendoorn. 2014. Understanding social engagement in autism: being different in perceiving and sharing affordances. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014), 98969

    2014

  48. [56]

    Molly Helt, Elizabeth Kelley, Marcel Kinsbourne, Juhi Pandey, Hilary Boorstein, Martha Herbert, and Deborah Fein. 2008. Can children with autism recover? If so, how? Neuropsychology review 18 (2008), 339–366

    2008

  49. [57]

    R Peter Hobson. 1989. On sharing experiences.Development and psychopathology 1, 3 (1989), 197–203

    1989

  50. [58]

    R Peter Hobson. 1990. On acquiring knowledge about people and the capacity to pretend: response to Leslie (1987). (1990)

    1987

  51. [59]

    R Peter Hobson. 1991. Against the theory of ‘theory of mind’. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 9, 1 (1991), 33–51

    1991

  52. [60]

    R Peter Hobson. 1993. The emotional origins of social understanding. Philo- sophical psychology 6, 3 (1993), 227–249

    1993

  53. [61]

    Juan Pablo Hourcade, Natasha E Bullock-Rest, and Thomas E Hansen. 2012. Multitouch tablet applications and activities to enhance the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorders. Personal and ubiquitous computing 16 Designing LLM-simulated Immersive Spaces to Enhan...

    2012

  54. [62]

    Che-Wei Hsu and Yee-San Teoh. 2017. Investigating event memory in chil- dren with autism spectrum disorder: Effects of a computer-mediated interview. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 47 (2017), 359–372

    2017

  55. [63]

    Kara Hume, Rachel Loftin, and Johanna Lantz. 2009. Increasing independence in autism spectrum disorders: A review of three focused interventions. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 39 (2009), 1329–1338

    2009

  56. [64]

    Ziwei Ji, Tiezheng Yu, Yan Xu, Nayeon Lee, Etsuko Ishii, and Pascale Fung

  57. [65]

    Naomi Josman, Hadass Milika Ben-Chaim, Shula Friedrich, and Patrice L Weiss

  58. [66]

    Leo Kanner, Alejandro Rodriguez, and Barbara Ashenden. 1972. How far can autistic children go in matters of social adaptation? Journal of autism and childhood schizophrenia 2 (1972), 9–33

    1972

  59. [67]

    Connie Kasari, Jill Locke, Amanda Gulsrud, and Erin Rotheram-Fuller. 2011. Social networks and friendships at school: Comparing children with and without ASD. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 41 (2011), 533–544

    2011

  60. [68]

    Fengfeng Ke and Sungwoong Lee. 2016. Virtual reality based collaborative design by children with high-functioning autism: Design-based flexibility, identity, and norm construction. Interactive Learning Environments 24, 7 (2016), 1511–1533

    2016

  61. [69]

    Norman Kiak Nam Kee, Noel Kok Hwee Chia, and Yiyu Cai. 2012. Universal design for learning (UDL1) and living (UDL2) in virtual reality-based treatments for children with autism. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Techno...

    2012

  62. [70]

    Robert L Koegel, Lynn Kern Koegel, and Lauren I Brookman. 2003. Empirically supported pivotal response interventions for children with autism. Evidence- based psychotherapies for children and adolescents 341357 (2003)

    2003

  63. [71]

    Evdokimos I Konstantinidis, Magda Hitoglou-Antoniadou, Andrej Luneski, Pana- giotis D Bamidis, and Maria M Nikolaidou. 2009. Using affective avatars and rich multimedia content for education of children with autism. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on pervasi...

    2009

  64. [72]

    Rahadian Kurniawan, Wuriandietry Mayang Purnamasari, Restu Rakhmawati, and Dimas Panji Eka Jalaputra. 2018. Development of game for self-help toilet learning for children with Autism. CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal 12, 1 (2018), 1–12

    2018

  65. [73]

    Cecília Sik Lányi and Ádám Tilinger. 2004. Multimedia and virtual reality in the rehabilitation of autistic children. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer, 22–28

    2004

  66. [74]

    Wan-Ju Lee, Chi-Wen Huang, Chia-Jung Wu, Shing-Tsaan Huang, and Gwo- Dong Chen. 2012. The effects of using embodied interactions to improve learning performance. In 2012 IEEE 12th international conference on advanced learning technologies. IEEE, 557–559

    2012

  67. [75]

    Yuan Li, Yixuan Zhang, and Lichao Sun. 2023. MetaAgents: Simulating Inter- actions of Human Behaviors for LLM-based Task-oriented Coordination via Collaborative Generative Agents. arXiv:2310.06500 [cs.AI]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Lili Liu, Xinyu Yao, Jingying Chen, Kun Zhang, Leyuan Liu, Guangshuai Wang, and Yutao Ling. 2024. Virtual reality utilized for safety skills training for autistic individuals: a review. Behavioral Sciences 14, 2 (2024), 82

    2024

  69. [77]

    Dai, Diyi Yang, and Soroush Vosoughi

    Ruibo Liu, Ruixin Yang, Chenyan Jia, Ge Zhang, Denny Zhou, Andrew M. Dai, Diyi Yang, and Soroush Vosoughi. 2023. Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactions. arXiv:2305.16960 [cs.CL]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Xiongyi Liu, Qing Wu, Wenbing Zhao, and Xiong Luo. 2017. Technology- facilitated diagnosis and treatment of individuals with autism spectrum disorder: An engineering perspective. Applied Sciences 7, 10 (2017), 1051

    2017

  71. [79]

    Pedro Lopes, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Affordance++ allowing objects to communicate dynamic use. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual acm conference on human factors in computing systems . 2515–2524

    2015

  72. [80]

    Timo Lorenz, Nomi Reznik, and Kathrin Heinitz. 2017. A different point of view: The neurodiversity approach to autism and work. Autism: Paradigms, Recent Research, and Clinical Applications (2017)

    2017

  73. [81]

    Gonzalo Lorenzo, Asunción Lledó, Jorge Pomares, and Rosabel Roig. 2016. De- sign and application of an immersive virtual reality system to enhance emotional skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. Computers & Education 98 (2016), 192–205

    2016

  74. [82]

    Katherine A Loveland. 1991. Social affordances and interaction II: Autism and the affordances of the human environment. Ecological psychology 3, 2 (1991), 99–119

    1991

  75. [83]

    Shane L Lynch and Angela N Irvine. 2009. Inclusive education and best practice for children with autism spectrum disorder: An integrated approach. Interna- tional journal of Inclusive education 13, 8 (2009), 845–859

    2009

  76. [84]

    Yue Lyu, Pengcheng An, Huan Zhang, Keiko Katsuragawa, and Jian Zhao. 2024. Designing AI-Enabled Games to Support Social-Emotional Learning for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15576 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Matthew J Maenner. 2023. Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—Autism and Developmental Disabili- ties Monitoring Network, 11 sites, United States, 2020. MMWR. Surveillance Summaries 72 (2023)

    2023

  78. [86]

    Skevi Matsentidou and Charalambos Poullis. 2014. Immersive visualizations in a VR cave environment for the training and enhancement of social skills for children with autism. In 2014 international conference on computer vision theory and applications (VISAPP), Vol. 3. IEEE, 230–236

    2014

  79. [87]

    James P McGee and Catherine Lord. 2001. Educating children with autism . National Academies Press

    2001

  80. [88]

    Chao Mei, Lee Mason, and John Quarles. 2014. Usability issues with 3D user interfaces for adolescents with high functioning autism. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility . 99–106

    2014

  81. [89]

    Laura Millen, Rob Edlin-White, and Sue Cobb. 2010. The development of educa- tional collaborative virtual environments for children with autism. InProceedings of the 5th Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology, Cambridge, Vol. 1

    2010

  82. [90]

    Ruchik Mishra and Karla Conn Welch. 2024. Towards scalable robotic interven- tion of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder using LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00260 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Fereshteh Mohammadzaheri, Lynn Kern Koegel, Mohammad Rezaee, and Seyed Majid Rafiee. 2014. A randomized clinical trial comparison between piv- otal response treatment (PRT) and structured applied behavior analysis (ABA) intervention for children with autism. Journal of autism ...

    2014

  84. [92]

    Maggie A Mosher, Adam C Carreon, Stephanie L Craig, and Lindsay C Ruhter

  85. [93]

    Rebecca Muhle, Stephanie V Trentacoste, and Isabelle Rapin. 2004. The genetics of autism. Pediatrics 113, 5 (2004), e472–e486

    2004

  86. [94]

    H Neale, A Leonard, and S Kerr. 2002. Exploring the role of virtual environments in the special needs classroom. In Proceedings of the 4th ICDVRAT . Veszprem Hungary, 259–266

    2002

  87. [95]

    Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition . Basic books

    2013

  88. [96]

    Donald A Norman. 1988. The psychology of everyday things. Basic books

    1988

  89. [97]

    Mmachi God’sglory Obiorah, Anne Marie Marie Piper, and Michael Horn. 2021. Designing AACs for people with aphasia dining in restaurants. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–14

    2021

  90. [98]

    François Osiurak, Yves Rossetti, and Arnaud Badets. 2017. What is an affordance? 40 years later. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 77 (2017), 403–417

    2017

  91. [99]

    Biplov Paneru and Bishwash Paneru. 2024. The Nexus of AR/VR, Large Language Models, UI/UX, and Robotics Technologies in Enhancing Learning and Social Interaction for Children: A Systematic Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18162 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Xianghe Pang, Shuo Tang, Rui Ye, Yuxin Xiong, Bolun Zhang, Yanfeng Wang, and Siheng Chen. 2024. Self-alignment of large language models via multi- agent social simulation. In ICLR 2024 Workshop on Large Language Model (LLM) Agents

    2024

  93. [101]

    Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. 2023. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–22

    2023

  94. [102]

    Sarah Parsons and Sue Cobb. 2013. Who chooses what I need? Child voice and user-involvement in the development of learning technologies for children with autism. EPSRC Observatory for Responsible Innovation in ICT (2013)

    2013

  95. [103]

    Sarah Parsons, Anne Leonard, and Peter Mitchell. 2006. Virtual environments for social skills training: comments from two adolescents with autistic spectrum disorder. Computers & Education 47, 2 (2006), 186–206

    2006

  96. [104]

    Sarah Parsons, Peter Mitchell, and Anne Leonard. 2005. Do adolescents with autistic spectrum disorders adhere to social conventions in virtual environ- ments? Autism 9, 1 (2005), 95–117

    2005

  97. [105]

    Marie Pelé, Caroline Bellut, Elise Debergue, Charlotte Gauvin, Anne Jeanneret, Thibault Leclere, Lucie Nicolas, Florence Pontier, Diorne Zausa, and Cédric Sueur. 2017. Cultural influence of social information use in pedestrian road- crossing behaviours. Royal Society open scie...

    2017

  98. [106]

    Yicong Peng, Wei Zhu, Fangyu Shi, Yi Fang, and Guangtao Zhai. 2019. Virtual reality based road crossing training for autistic children with behavioral analysis. In Digital TV and Multimedia Communication: 15th International Forum, IFTC 2018, Shanghai, China, September 20–21, 2...

    2019

  99. [107]

    Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, Christopher Frauenberger, Helen Pain, Gnanathusha- ran Rajendran, Tim Smith, Rachel Menzies, Mary Ellen Foster, Alyssa Alcorn, Sam Wass, Sara Bernadini, et al. 2012. Developing technology for autism: an interdisciplinary approach. Personal and Ubiquitous...

    2012

  100. [108]

    Kathleen A Quill. 1997. Instructional considerations for young children with autism: The rationale for visually cued instruction. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 27, 6 (1997), 697–714

    1997

  101. [109]

    Maxwell JD Ramstead, Samuel PL Veissière, and Laurence J Kirmayer. 2016. Cultural affordances: Scaffolding local worlds through shared intentionality and regimes of attention. Frontiers in psychology 7 (2016), 206814

    2016

  102. [110]

    Patricia A Rao, Deborah C Beidel, and Michael J Murray. 2008. Social skills interventions for children with Asperger’s syndrome or high-functioning autism: A review and recommendations. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 38 (2008), 353–361

    2008

  103. [111]

    François Robain, Michel Godel, Nada Kojovic, Martina Franchini, Fiona Journal, and Marie Schaer. 2022. Measuring social orienting in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder using cartoons stimuli. Journal of Psychiatric Research 156 (2022), 398–405

    2022

  104. [112]

    Delphine B Rosset, Cecilie Rondan, David Da Fonseca, Andreia Santos, Brigitte Assouline, and Christine Deruelle. 2008. Typical emotion processing for cartoon but not for real faces in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 38 (...

    2008

  105. [113]

    Erin Rotheram-Fuller, Connie Kasari, Brandt Chamberlain, and Jill Locke. 2010. Social involvement of children with autism spectrum disorders in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 51, 11 (2010), 1227–1234

    2010

  106. [114]

    James A Russell. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology 39, 6 (1980), 1161

    1980

  107. [115]

    James A Russell, Anna Weiss, and Gerald A Mendelsohn. 1989. Affect grid: a single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of personality and social psychology 57, 3 (1989), 493

    1989

  108. [116]

    Mario Saiano, Laura Pellegrino, Maura Casadio, Susanna Summa, Eleonora Garbarino, Valentina Rossi, Daniela Dall’Agata, and Vittorio Sanguineti. 2015. Natural interfaces and virtual environments for the acquisition of street crossing and path following skills in adults with Aut...

    2015

  109. [117]

    Katayoun Salamati, Bastian J Schroeder, Duane R Geruschat, and Nagui M Rouphail. 2013. Event-based modeling of driver yielding behavior to pedestrians at two-lane roundabout approaches.Transportation research record 2389, 1 (2013), 1–11

    2013

  110. [118]

    Stefanie Schelinski and Katharina von Kriegstein. 2019. The relation between vocal pitch and vocal emotion recognition abilities in people with autism spec- trum disorder and typical development. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 49 (2019), 68–82

    2019

  111. [119]

    Richard C Schmidt and Michael J Richardson. 2008. Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics . Springer, 281–308

    2008

  112. [120]

    Laura Schreibman and O Ivar Lovaas. 1973. Overselective response to social stimuli by autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1, 2 (1973), 152–168

    1973

  113. [121]

    Leila Shahmoradi and Sorayya Rezayi. 2022. Cognitive rehabilitation in people with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review of emerging virtual reality- based approaches. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 19, 1 (2022), 91

    2022

  114. [122]

    Murray Shanahan, Kyle McDonell, and Laria Reynolds. 2023. Role play with large language models. Nature 623, 7987 (01 Nov 2023), 493–498. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41586-023-06647-8

    2023 doi

  115. [123]

    Yongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li, Weiming Lu, and Yueting Zhuang. 2023. HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face. arXiv:2303.17580 [cs.CL]

    2023 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Xuemei Shi, Xiaoguang Du, and Xiedong Song. 2023. Research on Miniaturiza- tion Trend of ChatGPT Technology Model. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology 3, 3 (2023), 95–99

    2023

  117. [125]

    Priyamvada Singh, Rohit Rathore, Rashmi Chauhan, and RH Goudar. 2012. A gaming Model for teaching autistic children basic traffic rules. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 2, 5 (2012), 507

    2012

  118. [126]

    I Siti Iradah and AK Rabiah. 2011. EduTism: an assistive educational system for the treatment of autism children with intelligent approach. InVisual Informatics: Sustaining Research and Innovations: Second International Visual Informatics Conference, IVIC 2011, Selangor, Malay...

    2011

  119. [127]

    Leann E Smith, Matthew J Maenner, and Marsha Mailick Seltzer. 2012. Devel- opmental trajectories in adolescents and adults with autism: The case of daily living skills. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 51, 6 (2012), 622–631

    2012

  120. [128]

    Aiganym Soltiyeva, Wilk Oliveira, Alimanova Madina, Shyngys Adilkhan, Marat Urmanov, and Juho Hamari. 2023. My Lovely Granny’s Farm: An immersive virtual reality training system for children with autism spectrum disorder. Edu- cation and Information Technologies 28, 12 (2023),...

    2023

  121. [129]

    Dorothy C Strickland, David McAllister, Claire D Coles, and Susan Osborne

  122. [130]

    Teo Susnjak. 2022. ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? arXiv:2212.09292 [cs.AI]

    2022 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Yilin Tang, Liuqing Chen, Ziyu Chen, Wenkai Chen, Yu Cai, Yao Du, Fan Yang, and Lingyun Sun. 2024. EmoEden: Applying Generative Artificial Intelligence to Emotional Learning for Children with High-Function Autism. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Comput...

    2024

  124. [132]

    Orit Taubman-Ben-Ari, Mario Mikulincer, and Omri Gillath. 2004. The multi- dimensional driving style inventory—scale construct and validation. Accident Analysis & Prevention 36, 3 (2004), 323–332

    2004

  125. [133]

    Max Thorsson, Martyna A Galazka, Jakob Åsberg Johnels, and Nouchine Had- jikhani. 2024. Influence of autistic traits and communication role on eye contact behavior during face-to-face interaction. Scientific Reports 14, 1 (2024), 8162

    2024

  126. [134]

    Michael Tomasello. 2014. A natural history of human thinking . Harvard Univer- sity Press

    2014

  127. [135]

    Wei-Te Tsai, I-Jui Lee, and Chien-Hsu Chen. 2021. Inclusion of third-person per- spective in CAVE-like immersive 3D virtual reality role-playing games for social reciprocity training of children with an autism spectrum disorder. Universal Access in the Information Society 20, ...

    2021

  128. [136]

    Aimilia Tzanavari, Nefi Charalambous-Darden, Kyriakos Herakleous, and Char- alambos Poullis. 2015. Effectiveness of an Immersive Virtual Environment (CAVE) for teaching pedestrian crossing to children with PDD-NOS. In 2015 IEEE 15th international conference on advanced learnin...

    2015

  129. [137]

    Nkiruka Uzuegbunam, Wing Hang Wong, Sen-Ching Samson Cheung, and Lisa Ruble. 2017. MEBook: multimedia social greetings intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 11, 4 (2017), 520–535

    2017

  130. [138]

    Helma Van Rijn, Pieter Jan Stappers, et al. 2008. The puzzling life of autistic tod- dlers: design guidelines from the LINKX project. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2008 (2008)

    2008

  131. [139]

    Koen Vellenga, H Joe Steinhauer, Alexander Karlsson, Göran Falkman, Asli Rhodin, and Ashok Chaitanya Koppisetty. 2022. Driver intention recognition: State-of-the-art review. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 3 (2022), 602–616

    2022

  132. [140]

    Diogo Vieira, Ana Leal, Nuno Almeida, Samuel Silva, and António Teixeira

  133. [141]

    Susanna Värtinen, Perttu Hämäläinen, and Christian Guckelsberger. 2024. Gen- erating Role-Playing Game Quests With GPT Language Models. IEEE Transac- tions on Games 16, 1 (2024), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2022.3228480

    2024

  134. [142]

    S Jane Weeks and R Peter Hobson. 1987. The salience of facial expression for autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 28, 1 (1987), 137–152

    1987

  135. [143]

    Elisabeth M Whyte, Joshua M Smyth, and K Suzanne Scherf. 2015. Designing serious game interventions for individuals with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 45 (2015), 3820–3831

    2015

  136. [144]

    Chathurika S Wickramasinghe, Daniel L Marino, Javier Grandio, and Milos Manic. 2020. Trustworthy AI development guidelines for human system inter- action. In 2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI) . IEEE, 130–136

    2020

  137. [145]

    Connie Wong, Samuel L Odom, Kara A Hume, Ann W Cox, Angel Fettig, Suzanne Kucharczyk, Matthew E Brock, Joshua B Plavnick, Veronica P Fleury, and Tia R Schultz. 2015. Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive r...

    2015

  138. [146]

    2019.Inclusive education for autistic children: Helping children and young people to learn and flourish in the classroom

    Rebecca Wood. 2019.Inclusive education for autistic children: Helping children and young people to learn and flourish in the classroom . Jessica Kingsley Publishers

    2019

  139. [147]

    Qin Wu, Chenmei Yu, Yanjun Chen, Jiayu Yao, Xi Wu, Xiaolan Peng, and Teng Han. 2020. Squeeze the ball: Designing an interactive playground towards aiding social activities of children with low-function autism. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Compu...

    2020

  140. [148]

    Yudan Wu, Shanhe You, Zixuan Guo, Xiangyang Li, Guyue Zhou, and Jiangtao Gong. 2023. MR. Brick: designing a remote mixed-reality educational game system for promoting children’s social & collaborative skills. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Comput...

    2023

  141. [149]

    Tell Your Day

    “Tell Your Day”: Developing Multimodal Interaction Applications for Children with ASD. In Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches and Methods: 11th International Conference, UAHCI 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver...

    2017

  142. [150]

    Feng Yan. 2011. A sunny day: Ann and ron’s world an ipad application for children with autism. In Serious Games Development and Applications: Second International Conference, SGDA 2011, Lisbon, Portugal, September 19-20, 2011. Proceedings 2. Springer, 129–138

    2011

  143. [151]

    Hui Yang, Sifu Yue, and Yunzhong He. 2023. Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinions. arXiv:2306.02224 [cs.AI] Designing LLM-simulated Immersive Spaces to Enhance Autistic Children’s Social Affordances Understanding IUI ’25, March 24–27, 2025, Cag...

    2023 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Aaron Zaffke, Niharika Jain, Norah Johnson, Mohammad Arif Ul Alam, Marta Magiera, and Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed. 2015. iCanLearn: A mobile application for creating flashcards and social stories™ for children with autism. In Smart Homes and Health Telematics: 12th International Confe...

    2015

  145. [153]

    Irene Zanardi. 2022. Hoomie Sweet Home: A Qualitative Study on the Small Multisensory Space” Hoomie” for Inclusion of Autistic Kids in a Primary School. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts . 1–4

    2022

  146. [154]

    Lian Zhang, Qiang Fu, Amy Swanson, Amy Weitlauf, Zachary Warren, and Nilanjan Sarkar. 2018. Design and evaluation of a collaborative virtual environ- ment (CoMove) for autism spectrum disorder intervention. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 11, 2 (2018), 1–22

    2018

  147. [155]

    Wenbing Zhao, Xiongyi Liu, Tie Qiu, and Xiong Luo. 2020. Virtual avatar-based life coaching for children with autism spectrum disorder. Computer 53, 2 (2020), 26–34

    2020

  148. [156]

    Chen Zheng and Barbara Tversky. 2024. Putting it Together, Together.Cognitive Science 48, 2 (2024), e13405

    2024

  149. [157]

    Little Explorer

    Cheng Zheng, Caowei Zhang, Xuan Li, Xin Liu, Chuqi Tang, Guanyun Wang, Cheng Yao, Fan Zhang, Wenjie Xu, and Fangtian Ying. 2017. Toon-chat: A cartoon-masked chat system for children with autism. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Posters. 1–2. A EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS A.1 Online questionaire ...

    2017

  150. [158]

    Ziwei Xu, Sanjay Jain, and Mohan Kankanhalli. 2024. Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Models. arXiv:2401.11817 [cs.CL]

    2024 arXiv

  151. [2007]

    Topics in language disorders 27, 3 (2007), 226–241

    An evolution of virtual reality training designs for children with autism and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Topics in language disorders 27, 3 (2007), 226–241

    2007

  152. [2008]

    International Journal on Disability and Human Development 7, 1 (2008), 49–56

    Effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching street-crossing skills to children and adolescents with autism. International Journal on Disability and Human Development 7, 1 (2008), 49–56

    2008

  153. [2010]

    Journal of Assistive Technologies 4, 1 (2010), 38–48

    Guidelines for researchers and practitioners designing software and software trials for children with autism. Journal of Assistive Technologies 4, 1 (2010), 38–48

    2010

  154. [2014]

    Remedial and Special Education 35, 2 (2014), 91–101

    Promoting social competence and peer relationships for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education 35, 2 (2014), 91–101

    2014

  155. [2017]

    Simulation and Serious Games for Education (2017), 29–45

    ICT-enabled emotional learning for special needs education. Simulation and Serious Games for Education (2017), 29–45

    2017

  156. [2021]

    InProceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems

    Exploring the use of a voice-based conversational agent to empower ado- lescents with autism spectrum disorder. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–15

    2021

  157. [2022]

    Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 9, 3 (2022), 334–350

    Immersive technology to teach social skills to students with autism spec- trum disorder: A literature review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 9, 3 (2022), 334–350

    2022

  158. [2023]

    In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023

    Towards mitigating LLM hallucination via self reflection. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 . 1827–1843

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.