Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Influence of supermassive primordial black holes on ultraviolet luminosity of high-redshift galaxies

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Supermassive primordial black holes with masses near 10^6.3–10^8.3 solar masses and tiny abundances can fit the JWST bright-galaxy excess at z≳10.

desk verdict The MCMC is careful, but the global per-halo PBH occupation in Eq. (11) makes the claimed JWST fit an artifact; fix that before citing the constraints. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03152 v3 pith:XG63AAEK submitted 2025-09-03 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Yi-Yang Li , Hai-Long Huang , Yun-Song Piao This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords supermassiveprimordialblackholesUVluminosityfunctionhigh-redshiftgalaxiesJWSTexcessaccretionhalomassPoissonfluctuationsMarkovchainMonteCarlo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

JWST observes more bright galaxies at z≳10 than the standard galaxy-formation model predicts. The paper tries to establish that supermassive primordial black holes (SMPBHs) formed as inflationary vacuum bubbles supply the missing ultraviolet light, with no need for extreme star-formation efficiency. It models two channels—Poisson fluctuations in the black-hole number density that boost the halo mass function, and sub-Eddington accretion that adds intrinsic UV emission—and fits the z=11 luminosity function by Markov chain Monte Carlo. The fit prefers characteristic masses M_PBH ≈ 10^6.3–10^8.3 M_sun, abundances f_PBH ≈ 10^-7–10^-5, and Eddington ratios λ_E ≤ 0.1. If right, the same population doubles as seeds for the supermassive black holes seen in later galaxies.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the extended, number-density-normalized PBH mass function ψ3(m) ∝ m^(-5/2) exp[-ln^2(m/M_PBH)/(2σ²)], rooted in a peak-like distribution from inflationary vacuum bubbles; its steep high-mass tail provides the massive black holes that matter for luminosity. The second mechanism is the compound Poisson luminosity distribution: Poisson fluctuations in PBH number density within halos both modify the halo mass function and, combined with the bolometric-to-UV conversion L_UV = L_bol [1.862(L_bol/10^10 L_sun)^(-0.361) + 4.870(L_bol/10^10 L_sun)^(-0.0063)], add a stochastic UV component on top of the empirical stellar luminosity. MCMC over M_PBH, f_PBH, and σ at fixed Eddingto

What would settle it

Take deeper JWST spectroscopy of faint and bright galaxies at z≈11: if the bright-end excess is fully accounted for by ordinary star formation at the efficiencies already measured at z=4–9, or the galaxies show no sign of accretion (broad lines, variability, X-rays), the SMPBH luminosity channel is unnecessary. Alternatively, a 21-cm measurement that rules out the Poisson boost to the small-scale matter power spectrum would falsify the halo-mass-function mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the observed excess of luminous galaxies at z≳10 is explained by an accreting population of supermassive primordial black holes with a specific, peak-like mass distribution. The model computes the total galaxy UV luminosity as the sum of a stellar component from an empirical halo-mass–UV-magnitude relation and a PBH component from L_bol = λ_E L_Edd converted to 1450 Å luminosity. Because PBH counts inside halos are Poisson-distributed, the total luminosity is a convolution of stellar light with a compound Poisson process, which boosts the bright end of the UV luminosity function. MCMC posteriors give log f_PBH ≈ -5.6 to -7.6, log(M_PBH/M_sun) ≈ 8.3, 7.3, 6.3 for fix

Load-bearing premise

The whole fit presupposes that supermassive primordial black holes exist with the specific peak-like mass distribution produced by inflationary vacuum bubbles; if that production mechanism does not operate, or the mass distribution differs, the inferred parameter ranges have no physical basis and the explanation of the JWST excess is an artifact of the assumed population.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The bright end of the z≈11 UV luminosity function is lifted by the high-mass tail of ψ3; the preferred width σ≈1.4 is large enough to supply rare, very massive PBHs.
  • M_PBH λ_E ≈ 10^6.26 M_sun across the three fixed Eddington ratios, so lower accretion efficiency is compensated by higher characteristic PBH mass at roughly constant number density.
  • With λ_E = 0 the Poisson effect alone cannot reproduce the bright-end excess; intrinsic sub-Eddington emission from accreting PBHs is the dominant channel.
  • The same SMPBHs act as supermassive-black-hole seeds at z≲20, linking the UV excess to the massive black holes seen in later epochs.
  • No extreme star-formation efficiency or redshift-dependent star-formation efficiency is required; standard ΛCDM with the fitted SMPBH component fits the JWST bright end.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An untested consequence: if these PBHs dominate the bright-end light, the same galaxies should show signatures of accretion (X-ray or infrared emission, variability), which the paper does not check.
  • The degeneracy M_PBH λ_E ≈ const means independent constraints on either parameter—for example from gravitational-wave backgrounds or clustering—are needed to fix the population uniquely.
  • The appendix's power-spectrum calculation implies the extended distribution changes the Poisson cutoff scale relative to monochromatic PBHs; 21-cm or small-scale CMB measurements could distinguish the two, a forecast the paper does not make.
  • Because the Eddington ratio is fixed to discrete values, allowing λ_E to vary with halo mass or redshift is a natural test of whether one universal sub-Eddington ratio suffices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that supermassive primordial black holes (SMPBHs) with an extended, peak-like mass distribution from inflationary vacuum bubbles can explain the JWST bright-end excess in the high-redshift galaxy UV luminosity function. The model adds PBH accretion luminosity to a stellar UV luminosity–halo mass relation, treats the number of PBHs per halo with a Poisson distribution, and uses MCMC to constrain log f_PBH, log M_PBH, and σ for fixed Eddington ratios λ_E = 0.01, 0.1, and 1. The authors report best-fit parameters and show that the model at z = 11 increases the bright-end UV LF relative to standard ΛCDM, claiming consistency with JWST data.

Significance. If the result holds, it provides a concrete and testable parameter region for SMPBHs as an explanation of the JWST high-redshift galaxy excess, and the appendices contain useful formalism for extended PBH mass functions and the associated Poisson contribution to the matter power spectrum. The paper includes an MCMC implementation and posterior tables, which are valuable. However, the claimed consistency is a fit to the very data it is said to explain, and several modeling choices—the mass-independent PBH occupation prescription, the unspecified M_min(z), the ambiguous role of the PBH-modified power spectrum, and the lack of propagated uncertainties in the stellar baseline—mean the quoted posteriors are effective parameters of an incompletely specified model rather than robust physical inferences. These issues are fixable but require substantive additional analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [III.B, Eq. (11)] The occupation prescription assigns a single mean λ = n0/nhalo to every halo, independent of halo mass. For PBHs as a dark-matter component, the expected number in a halo is λ(M_halo) = f_PBH M_halo/<m>, scaling with halo mass. The bright end of the UV LF is dominated by the most massive halos, so the constant-λ assumption underassigns PBHs there and overassigns them in low-mass halos; the MCMC posteriors therefore describe an effective occupation model, not physical f_PBH and M_PBH. Additionally, M_min(z) is never specified, leaving nhalo and hence λ undefined and f_PBH degenerate with this choice. Please adopt a mass-dependent occupation and state M_min(z) explicitly.
  2. [III.A and Appendix B] It is unclear whether the HMF used in the fits is the standard ΛCDM Sheth-Tormen HMF or the PBH-modified HMF derived in Appendix B. Section III.A says only that 'the HMF can be calculated with the Sheth-Tormen algorithm', without specifying the input power spectrum; Appendix B derives P_PBH and Figure 4 shows modified HMFs, but the main text does not state that this modified P(k) is used in the MCMC. This matters because Poisson-enhanced halo abundance independently boosts the bright end. If the modified HMF is used, it should appear in the model equations; if not, Appendix B is not part of the fits.
  3. [III.C / Fig. 3] The abstract's claim that the model is 'consistent with JWST observations' is a result of fitting log f_PBH, log M_PBH, and σ directly to those data. The paper reports no quantitative model comparison against the standard ΛCDM baseline, such as Δχ², AIC/BIC, or a posterior predictive check. Without such a comparison, the improved bright-end fit is an expected by-product of the fit, not evidence that the SMPBH model is favored. Please add a formal model comparison and discuss whether the extra parameters are warranted by the data.
  4. [III.A, Eq. (8)] The stellar baseline M_UV(M_halo,z) is obtained by fitting the six parameters p1–p6 to observed UV LF data at z = 4–9, then extrapolated to z = 11 and used inside the same likelihood that constrains PBH parameters. The paper does not propagate uncertainties in p_i; the PBH posteriors are conditional on this ad hoc baseline. Please either sample p_i jointly with the PBH parameters or quantify the sensitivity of the f_PBH–M_PBH constraints to the p_i values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] Grammar: 'Recently James Webb Space Telescope have observed' and 'JWST have' should be 'has observed'/'has'.
  2. [Appendix B, Eq. (B3)] The symbol 'Mc' is used in Eq. (B3) but is not defined; the main text uses M_PBH. Please make the notation consistent.
  3. [Abstract / Table II] The abstract emphasizes sub-Eddington ratios λ_E << 1, but Table II also reports fits with λ_E = 1. Clarify whether λ_E = 1 is part of the central claim or an auxiliary check.
  4. [III.B, footnote 4] The footnote says low-mass halos only matter when PBH luminosity far exceeds the stellar component, but no quantitative threshold or M_min(z) function is given. This should be specified.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] The color ordering in the caption (λ_E = 0.100 red, 1.000 blue, 0.010 gray) is inconsistent with the ordering in Table II; please align them for readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed JWST consistency is an in-sample fit: the MCMC optimizes PBH parameters against the same bright-end UV LF data that the model is then said to 'account for'.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III.B likelihood; Sec. III.C Results and Fig. 3]
    "The results show that the inclusion of SMPBHs, especially with accretion emission, leads to a significantly improved fit to the observed data at the bright end [6, 14]. This demonstrates that our SMPBHs model can account for the excess of luminous galaxies detected by JWST."

    The JWST bright-end data [6,14] are precisely the φ_obs,i entering the log-likelihood in Sec. III.B. The MCMC (Table I) varies log f_PBH, log M_PBH, and σ to minimize (log φ_model,i - log φ_obs,i)^2 at these magnitudes. Therefore the 'significantly improved fit' and 'can account for the excess' restate the optimization: the model's bright end is pushed toward the observed points by construction. No withheld data, out-of-sample prediction, or fixed-from-first-principles parameter set is used; the consistency is an in-sample property of the fit.

full rationale

The paper's forward model (mass function Eq. 1, luminosity conversion Eq. 5, Poisson occupation Eq. 11) is a genuine model, and the mass-function shape is a theoretical premise from earlier work, not derived from the JWST data, so the self-citations [70,80] are not by themselves circular under rule 4. The Eq. (11) mass-independent mean occupation is a physical modeling concern that could bias parameters, but it is not a definitional circularity. The clear circular step is interpretive: the same JWST UV LF data that define the 'excess' are used both to optimize the PBH parameters and then to conclude that the model 'can account for' that excess. That is a fitted input presented as an explanation, so the central consistency claim reduces to the fit. Score 6 reflects partial circularity: the model still has independent theoretical content, but the headline validation is not an independent confirmation.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on fitted parameters (PBH mass, abundance, distribution width, Eddington ratio) and on a hypothesized PBH population whose mass function and existence are taken from the authors' own prior work. No independent evidence is offered for the PBH population, and the main free parameters are tuned directly to the target JWST data.

free parameters (6)
  • p1-p6 = p1=-13.12, p2=-8.94, p3=-0.0355, p4=5.78, p5=-3.84, p6=0.341 (Eq. 9)
    Parameters of the empirical Mhalo-MUV relation, fit to low-redshift UV LF data (z=4-9); treated as fixed in the MCMC without error propagation.
  • log10(f_PBH) = -5.60 to -7.59 depending on lambda_E (Table II)
    PBH abundance relative to dark matter, sampled in MCMC.
  • log10(M_PBH/M_sun) = 8.26, 7.26, 6.26 for lambda_E=0.01,0.1,1
    Characteristic PBH mass, sampled in MCMC.
  • sigma = ~1.4
    Width of PBH mass distribution, sampled in MCMC.
  • lambda_E = fixed at 0.01, 0.1, 1
    Eddington ratio assumed same for all PBHs; not sampled.
  • M_min(z) = unspecified
    Minimum halo mass hosting PBHs, used in Eq. (11); no value or redshift evolution given.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Sheth-Tormen halo mass function
    Used to compute dn/dMhalo for the UV LF (Section III A, Ref. [82]).
  • standard math Compound Poisson statistics for PBHs in halos
    Used to build the total PBH luminosity distribution (Section III B).
  • domain assumption SMPBHs exist with mass function Eq. (1) from inflationary vacuum bubbles
    Imported from Ref. [70] (same group); no independent evidence or derivation in this paper.
  • domain assumption All PBHs have the same Eddington ratio lambda_E
    Stated in footnote 3; acknowledged as a simplification.
  • domain assumption Additive stellar and PBH luminosities
    Eq. (10); ignores dust, obscuration, and duty cycle effects.
  • domain assumption PBHs only reside in halos with M > M_min
    Footnote 4; M_min is unspecified.
invented entities (1)
  • Supermassive primordial black holes from inflationary vacuum bubbles
    purpose: Provide additional UV luminosity and Poisson boost to explain bright JWST galaxies
    The PBH population is hypothesized based on a prior mechanism; there is no independent detection and its parameters are inferred from the very data it explains.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Influence of supermassive primordial black holes on ultraviolet luminosity of high-redshift galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XG63AAEK

@misc{pith2026250903152,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Influence of supermassive primordial black holes on ultraviolet luminosity of high-redshift galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XG63AAEK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03152}
}
abstract

Recently James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have observed an excess of luminous galaxies at high redshifts ($z \gtrsim 10$). In this work, we investigate whether supermassive primordial black holes (SMPBHs) can explain it by their influence on the ultraviolet luminosity function (UV LF) of high-redshift galaxies. Through Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis, we constrain the parameters relevant with SMPBHs against current JWST observational data. The results reveal that SMPBHs with masses $M_{\rm PBH} \sim 10^{6.3\text{-}8.3} M_\odot$, abundances $f_{\rm PBH} \sim 10^{-7}\text{-}10^{-5}$, and sub-Eddington ratios $\lambda_E \ll 1$ can effectively enhance the bright end of the UV LF, consistent with JWST observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03152 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The corresponding UV LF in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The MCMC posterior distributions at redshift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Influence of SMPBHs with the mass spectrum ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Left panel: Matter power spectra at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constraining supermassive primordial black hole clustering with the angular auto-correlation of $z\simeq 6$ quasars

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    MCMC comparison of projected PBH correlation functions with z≈6 quasar angular auto-correlation data yields posterior constraints f_PBH∼10^{-3}, m_PBH∼10^{12}M_⊙ for Poisson models and ξ_eff≃2.1, r_cl≃76 Mpc for clust...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Labb´ e, P

    I. Labb´ e, P. van Dokkum, E. Nelson, R. Bezanson, K. A. Suess, J. Leja, G. Brammer, K. Whitaker, E. Mathews, M. Stefanon, and B. Wang, A population of red candidate massive galaxies 600 Myr after the Big Bang, Nature (London)616, 266 (2023), arXiv:2207.12446 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    B. E. Robertson, S. Tacchella, B. D. Johnson, K. Hainline, L. Whitler, D. J. Eisenstein, R. Endsley, M. Rieke, D. P. Stark, S. Alberts, A. Dressler, E. Egami, R. Hausen, G. Rieke, I. Shivaei, C. C. Williams, C. N. A. Willmer, S. Arribas, N. Bonaventura, A. Bunker, A. J. Cameron, S. Carniani, S. Charlot, J. Chevallard, M. Curti, E. Curtis-Lake, F. D’Eugeni...

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Robertson, B

    B. Robertson, B. D. Johnson, S. Tacchella, D. J. Eisenstein, K. Hainline, S. Arribas, W. M. Baker, A. J. Bunker, S. Carniani, P. A. Cargile, C. Carreira, S. Charlot, J. Chevallard, M. Curti, E. Curtis-Lake, F. D’Eugenio, E. Egami, R. Hausen, J. M. Helton, P. Jakobsen, Z. Ji, G. C. Jones, R. Maiolino, M. V. Maseda, E. Nelson, P. G. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, D. P...

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    C. M. Casey, H. B. Akins, M. Shuntov, O. Ilbert, L. Paquereau, M. Franco, C. C. Hayward, S. L. Finkelstein, M. Boylan-Kolchin, B. E. Robertson, N. Allen, M. Brinch, O. R. Cooper, X. Ding, N. E. Drakos, A. L. Faisst, S. Fujimoto, S. Gillman, S. Harish, M. Hirschmann, S. Jin, J. S. Kartaltepe, A. M. Koekemoer, V. Kokorev, D. Liu, A. S. Long, G. Magdis, C. M...

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    P. G. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, L. Costantin, D. Langeroodi, P. Rinaldi, M. Annunziatella, O. Ilbert, L. Colina, H. U. Nørgaard-Nielsen, T. R. Greve, G. ¨Ostlin, G. Wright, A. Alonso-Herrero, J. ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, K. I. Caputi, A. Eckart, O. Le F` evre, ´A. Labiano, M. Garc ´ ıa-Mar ´ ın, J. Hjorth, S. Kendrew, J. P. Pye, T. Tikkanen, P. van der Werf, F. Walte...

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    D. J. McLeod, C. T. Donnan, R. J. McLure, J. S. Dunlop, D. Magee, R. Begley, A. C. Carnall, F. Cullen, R. S. Ellis, M. L. Hamadouche, and T. M. Stanton, The galaxy UV luminosity function atz≃11from a suite of public JWST ERS, ERO, and Cycle-1 programs, Mon. Not. 14 R. Astron. Soc.527, 5004 (2024), arXiv:2304.14469 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Bouwens, G

    R. Bouwens, G. Illingworth, P. Oesch, M. Stefanon, R. Naidu, I. van Leeuwen, and D. Magee, UV luminosity density results atz >8 from the first JWST/NIRCam fields: limitations of early data sets and the need for spectroscopy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.523, 1009 (2023), arXiv:2212.06683 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    N. J. Adams, C. J. Conselice, D. Austin, T. Harvey, L. Ferreira, J. Trussler, I. Juodˇ zbalis, Q. Li, R. Windhorst, S. H. Cohen, R. A. Jansen, J. Summers, S. Tompkins, S. P. Driver, A. Robotham, J. C. J. D’Silva, H. Yan, D. Coe, B. Frye, N. A. Grogin, A. M. Koekemoer, M. A. Marshall, N. Pirzkal, R. E. Ryan, W. P. Maksym, M. J. Rutkowski, C. N. A. Willmer,...

    arXiv 2024

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    Harikane, M

    Y. Harikane, M. Ouchi, M. Oguri, Y. Ono, K. Nakajima, Y. Isobe, H. Umeda, K. Mawatari, and Y. Zhang, A Comprehensive Study of Galaxies atz∼9–16 Found in the Early JWST Data: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation History at the Pre- reionization Epoch, Astr...

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Harikane, A

    Y. Harikane, A. K. Inoue, R. S. Ellis, M. Ouchi, Y. Nakazato, N. Yoshida, Y. Ono, F. Sun, R. A. Sato, G. Ferrami, S. Fujimoto, N. Kashikawa, D. J. McLeod, P. G. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, M. Sawicki, Y. Sugahara, Y. Xu, S. Yamanaka, A. C. Carnall, F. Cullen, J. S. Dunlop, E. Egami, N...

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. L. Finkelstein, M. B. Bagley, H. C. Ferguson, S. M. Wilkins, J. S. Kartaltepe, C. Papovich, L. Y. A. Yung, P. Arrabal Haro, P. Behroozi, M. Dickinson, D. D. Kocevski, A. M. Koekemoer, R. L. Larson, A. Le Bail, A. M. Morales, P. G. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, D. Burgarella, R. Dav´ ...

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    S. L. Finkelstein, G. C. K. Leung, M. B. Bagley, M. Dickinson, H. C. Ferguson, C. Pa- povich, H. B. Akins, P. Arrabal Haro, R. Dav´ e, A. Dekel, J. S. Kartaltepe, D. D. Kocevski, A. M. Koekemoer, N. Pirzkal, R. S. Somerville, L. Y. A. Yung, R. O. Amor ´ ın, B. E. Back- haus, P...

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    C. T. Donnan, D. J. McLeod, R. J. McLure, J. S. Dunlop, A. C. Carnall, F. Cullen, and D. Magee, The abundance of z≳10 galaxy candidates in the HUDF using deep JWST NIR- Cam medium-band imaging, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.520, 4554 (2023), arXiv:2212.10126 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    C. T. Donnan, R. J. McLure, J. S. Dunlop, D. J. McLeod, D. Magee, K. Z. Arellano-C´ ordova, L. Barrufet, R. Begley, R. A. A. Bowler, A. C. Carnall, F. Cullen, R. S. Ellis, A. Fontana, G. D. Illingworth, N. A. Grogin, M. L. Hamadouche, A. M. Koekemoer, F. Y. Liu, C. Mason, P. S...

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    R. J. Bouwens, M. Stefanon, G. Brammer, P. A. Oesch, T. Herard-Demanche, G. D. Illing- worth, J. Matthee, R. P. Naidu, P. G. van Dokkum, and I. F. van Leeuwen, Evolution of the 16 UV LF from z∼15 to z∼8 using new JWST NIRCam medium-band observations over the HUDF/XDF, Mon. Not...

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    P. A. Oesch, R. J. Bouwens, G. D. Illingworth, I. Labb´ e, and M. Stefanon, The Dearth of z ∼10 Galaxies in All HST Legacy Fields—The Rapid Evolution of the Galaxy Population in the First 500 Myr, Astrophys. J.855, 105 (2018), arXiv:1710.11131 [astro-ph.GA]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Y.-Y. Wang, L. Lei, G.-W. Yuan, and Y.-Z. Fan, Modeling the JWST High-redshift Galaxies with a General Formation Scenario and the Consistency with the ΛCDM Model, Astrophys. J. Lett.954, L48 (2023), arXiv:2307.12487 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Black holes in the early Universe, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 168, 399 (1974)

    1974

  11. [19]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model, Sov. Astron.10, 602 (1967)

    1967

  12. [20]

    Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass, Mon

    S. Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 152, 75 (1971)

    1971

  13. [21]

    B. J. Carr, The primordial black hole mass spectrum., Astrophys. J.201, 1 (1975)

    1975

  14. [22]

    G. F. Chapline, Cosmological effects of primordial black holes, Nature (London)253, 251 (1975)

    1975

  15. [23]

    B. J. Carr and J. E. Lidsey, Primordial black holes and generalized constraints on chaotic inflation, Phys. Rev. D48, 543 (1993)

    1993

  16. [24]

    Ivanov, P

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter, Phys. Rev. D50, 7173 (1994)

    1994

  17. [25]

    Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, A

    J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, A. Linde, and D. Wands, Density perturbations and black hole formation in hybrid inflation, Phys. Rev. D54, 6040 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9605094 [astro-ph]

    1996 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Randall, M

    L. Randall, M. Soljaˇ ci´C, and A. H. Guth, Supernatural inflation: inflation from supersymme- try with no (very) small parameters, Nuclear Physics B472, 377 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9512439 [hep-ph]

    1996 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Murgia, G

    R. Murgia, G. Scelfo, M. Viel, and A. Raccanelli, Lyman-αForest Constraints on Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 071102 (2019), arXiv:1903.10509 [astro- ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz, A. Rac- canelli, and A. G. Riess, Did LIGO Detect Dark Matter?, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 201301 (2016), 17 arXiv:1603.00464 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 061101 (2016), arXiv:1603.08338 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    S. G. Rubin, A. S. Sakharov, and M. Y. Khlopov, The Formation of Primary Galactic Nuclei during Phase Transitions in the Early Universe, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoret- ical Physics92, 921 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0106187 [hep-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  23. [31]

    M. Y. Khlopov, S. G. Rubin, and A. S. Sakharov, Strong Primordial Inhomogeneities and Galaxy Formation, arXiv e-prints , astro-ph/0202505 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0202505 [astro- ph]

    2002 arXiv

  24. [32]

    M. Y. Khlopov, S. G. Rubin, and A. S. Sakharov, Primordial structure of massive black hole clusters, Astroparticle Physics23, 265 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0401532 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Khlopov, Primordial nonlinear structures and massive black holes from early universe, Journal of Physics: Conference Series66, 012032 (2007)

    M. Khlopov, Primordial nonlinear structures and massive black holes from early universe, Journal of Physics: Conference Series66, 012032 (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    M. Y. Khlopov, Primordial black holes, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics10, 495 (2010), arXiv:0801.0116 [astro-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  27. [35]

    K. M. Belotsky, V. I. Dokuchaev, Y. N. Eroshenko, E. A. Esipova, M. Y. Khlopov, L. A. Khromykh, A. A. Kirillov, V. V. Nikulin, S. G. Rubin, and I. V. Svadkovsky, Clusters of Primordial Black Holes, European Physical Journal C79, 246 (2019), arXiv:1807.06590 [astro- ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    S.-Y. Guo, M. Khlopov, X. Liu, L. Wu, Y. Wu, and B. Zhu, Footprints of axion-like particle in pulsar timing array data and James Webb Space Telescope observations, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy67, 111011 (2024), arXiv:2306.17022 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    G.-W. Yuan, L. Lei, Y.-Z. Wang, B. Wang, Y.-Y. Wang, C. Chen, Z.-Q. Shen, Y.-F. Cai, and Y.-Z. Fan, Rapidly growing primordial black holes as seeds of the massive high-redshift JWST Galaxies, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy67, 109512 (2024), arXiv:2303.09391 [a...

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Huang, J.-Q

    H.-L. Huang, J.-Q. Jiang, J. He, Y.-T. Wang, and Y.-S. Piao, Sub-Eddington accreting su- permassive primordial black holes explain Little Red Dots (2024), arXiv:2410.20663 [astro- ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Huang, Y.-T

    H.-L. Huang, Y.-T. Wang, and Y.-S. Piao, Supermassive primordial black holes for the GHZ9 18 and UHZ1 observed by the JWST (2024), arXiv:2410.05891 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Huang, J.-Q

    H.-L. Huang, J.-Q. Jiang, and Y.-S. Piao, High-redshift JWST massive galaxies and the ini- tial clustering of supermassive primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D110, 103540 (2024), arXiv:2407.15781 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Matteri, A

    A. Matteri, A. Ferrara, and A. Pallottini, Beyond the first galaxies primordial black holes shine (2025), arXiv:2503.18850 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025

  34. [42]

    Matteri, A

    A. Matteri, A. Pallottini, and A. Ferrara, Can primordial black holes explain the overabun- dance of bright super-early galaxies?, Astron. Astrophys.697, A65 (2025), arXiv:2503.01968 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Liu and V

    B. Liu and V. Bromm, Accelerating Early Massive Galaxy Formation with Primordial Black Holes, Astrophys. J. Lett.937, L30 (2022), arXiv:2208.13178 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Calz` a, D

    M. Calz` a, D. Pedrotti, and S. Vagnozzi, Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. I. Time-radial-symmetric metrics, Phys. Rev. D111, 024009 (2025), arXiv:2409.02804 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Calz` a, D

    M. Calz` a, D. Pedrotti, and S. Vagnozzi, Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. II. Non-time-radial-symmetric and loop quantum gravity-inspired metrics, Phys. Rev. D111, 024010 (2025), arXiv:2409.02807 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Calz` a, D

    M. Calz` a, D. Pedrotti, G.-W. Yuan, and S. Vagnozzi, Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. III. Covariant canonical quantum gravity models (2025), arXiv:2507.02396 [gr-qc]

    2025

  39. [47]

    N. J. McConnell, C.-P. Ma, K. Gebhardt, S. A. Wright, J. D. Murphy, T. R. Lauer, J. R. Graham, and D. O. Richstone, Two ten-billion-solar-mass black holes at the centres of giant elliptical galaxies, Nature (London)480, 215 (2011), arXiv:1112.1078 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  40. [48]

    B. Carr, F. K¨ uhnel, and M. Sandstad, Primordial black holes as dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 94, 083504 (2016), arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, Massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter and their detection with Gravitational Waves, J

    J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, Massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter and their detection with Gravitational Waves, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.840, 012032 (2017), arXiv:1702.08275 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. K¨ uhnel, Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science70, 355 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Constraints on primordial black holes, Reports on Progress in Physics84, 116902 (2021), arXiv:2002.12778 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate, Journal 19 of Physics G Nuclear Physics48, 043001 (2021), arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Primordial black holes as dark matter candidates, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes48, 1 (2022), arXiv:2110.02821 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Escriv` a, F

    A. Escriv` a, F. K¨ uhnel, and Y. Tada, Primordial black holes, inBlack Holes in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, edited by M. Arca Sedda, E. Bortolas, and M. Spera (2024) pp. 261–377

    2024

  47. [55]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Primordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy, Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 063001 (2018), arXiv:1801.05235 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dom` enech and M

    G. Dom` enech and M. Sasaki, Probing primordial black hole scenarios with terrestrial gravi- tational wave detectors, Classical and Quantum Gravity41, 143001 (2024), arXiv:2401.07615 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Kohri, T

    K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Suyama, Testing scenarios of primordial black holes being the seeds of supermassive black holes by ultracompact minihalos and CMBµdistortions, Phys. Rev. D90, 083514 (2014), arXiv:1405.5999 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  50. [58]

    De Luca, G

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, Heavy Primordial Black Holes from Strongly Clustered Light Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 171401 (2023), arXiv:2210.14171 [astro- ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Nakama, B

    T. Nakama, B. Carr, and J. Silk, Limits on primordial black holes fromµdistortions in cosmic microwave background, Phys. Rev. D97, 043525 (2018), arXiv:1710.06945 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    De Luca, G

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, Constraining the initial primordial black hole clustering with CMB distortion, Phys. Rev. D104, 063526 (2021), arXiv:2103.16369 [astro- ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    ¨Unal, E

    C. ¨Unal, E. D. Kovetz, and S. P. Patil, Multimessenger probes of inflationary fluctuations and primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D103, 063519 (2021), arXiv:2008.11184 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    A. D. Gow, H. Assadullahi, J. H. P. Jackson, K. Koyama, V. Vennin, and D. Wands, Non- perturbative non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes, EPL (Europhysics Letters)142, 49001 (2023), arXiv:2211.08348 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Hooper, A

    D. Hooper, A. Ireland, G. Krnjaic, and A. Stebbins, Supermassive primordial black holes from inflation, JCAP2024(4), 021, arXiv:2308.00756 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    C. T. Byrnes, J. Lesgourgues, and D. Sharma, Robustµ-distortion constraints on primor- 20 dial supermassive black holes from non-Gaussian perturbations, JCAP2024, 012 (2024), arXiv:2404.18475 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Sharma, J

    D. Sharma, J. Lesgourgues, and C. T. Byrnes, Spectral distortions from acoustic dissipation with non-Gaussian (or not) perturbations, JCAP2024, 090 (2024), arXiv:2404.18474 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Y. Cai, M. Zhu, and Y.-S. Piao, Primordial Black Holes from Null Energy Condition Violation during Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 021001 (2024), arXiv:2305.10933 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    A. J. Iovino, G. Perna, A. Riotto, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Curbing PBHs with PTAs, JCAP2024, 050 (2024), arXiv:2406.20089 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Wang, H.-L

    Z.-H. Wang, H.-L. Huang, and Y.-S. Piao, Broad primordial power spectrum andµ-distortion constraints on primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D111, 083553 (2025), arXiv:2501.08542 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Pritchard, C

    X. Pritchard, C. T. Byrnes, J. Lesgourgues, and D. Sharma, Robustµ-distortion constraints on primordial supermassive black holes from cubic (g N L) non-Gaussian perturbations, JCAP 2025, 079 (2025), arXiv:2505.08442 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Huang, Y

    H.-L. Huang, Y. Cai, J.-Q. Jiang, J. Zhang, and Y.-S. Piao, Supermassive Primordial Black Holes for Nano-Hertz Gravitational Waves and High-redshift JWST Galaxies, Res. Astron. Astrophys.24, 091001 (2024), arXiv:2306.17577 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Huang and Y.-S

    H.-L. Huang and Y.-S. Piao, Toward supermassive primordial black holes from inflationary bubbles, Phys. Rev. D110, 023501 (2024), arXiv:2312.11982 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boula...

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Ye and Y.-S

    G. Ye and Y.-S. Piao, Is the Hubble tension a hint of AdS phase around recombination?, Phys. Rev. D101, 083507 (2020), arXiv:2001.02451 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [74]

    G. Ye, B. Hu, and Y.-S. Piao, Implication of the Hubble tension for the primordial Universe in light of recent cosmological data, Phys. Rev. D104, 063510 (2021), arXiv:2103.09729 [astro- ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Jiang and Y.-S

    J.-Q. Jiang and Y.-S. Piao, Toward early dark energy and n s=1 with Planck , ACT, and SPT observations, Phys. Rev. D105, 103514 (2022), arXiv:2202.13379 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Jiang, G

    J.-Q. Jiang, G. Ye, and Y.-S. Piao, Return of Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum in light of recent cosmological tensions, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.527, L54 (2024), arXiv:2210.06125 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Jiang, G

    J.-Q. Jiang, G. Ye, and Y.-S. Piao, Impact of the Hubble tension on the r - n s contour, Physics Letters B851, 138588 (2024), arXiv:2303.12345 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Wang and Y.-S

    H. Wang and Y.-S. Piao, Dark energy in light of recent DESI BAO and Hubble tension (2024), 22 arXiv:2404.18579 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    H. Wang, G. Ye, J.-Q. Jiang, and Y.-S. Piao, Toward primordial gravitational waves and ns=1 in light of BICEP/Keck and DESI BAO data and the Hubble tension, Phys. Rev. D 111, 123505 (2025), arXiv:2409.17879 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Huang, J.-Q

    H.-L. Huang, J.-Q. Jiang, and Y.-S. Piao, Merger rate of supermassive primordial black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D109, 063515 (2024), arXiv:2312.00338 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [81]

    X. Shen, P. F. Hopkins, C.-A. Faucher-Gigu` ere, D. M. Alexander, G. T. Richards, N. P. Ross, and R. C. Hickox, The bolometric quasar luminosity function at z = 0-7, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.495, 3252 (2020), arXiv:2001.02696 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    R. K. Sheth and G. Tormen, Large-scale bias and the peak background split, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.308, 119 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901122 [astro-ph]

    1999 arXiv

  75. [83]

    J. B. Oke and J. E. Gunn, Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry., Astro- phys. J.266, 713 (1983)

    1983

  76. [84]

    R. J. Bouwens, P. A. Oesch, M. Stefanon, G. Illingworth, I. Labb´ e, N. Reddy, H. Atek, M. Montes, R. Naidu, T. Nanayakkara, E. Nelson, and S. Wilkins, New Determinations of the UV Luminosity Functions from z 9 to 2 Show a Remarkable Consistency with Halo Growth and a Constant...

    2021 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Foreman-Mackey, D

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125, 306 (2013), arXiv:1202.3665 [astro-ph.IM]

    2013 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Escriv` a, E

    A. Escriv` a, E. Bagui, and S. Clesse, Simulations of PBH formation at the QCD epoch and comparison with the GWTC-3 catalog, JCAP2023, 004 (2023), arXiv:2209.06196 [astro- ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Raidal, V

    M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Formation of Primordial Black Hole Binaries and Their Merger Rates, inPrimordial Black Holes, edited by C. Byrnes, G. Franciolini, T. Harada, P. Pani, and M. Sasaki (2025) arXiv:2404.08416 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Clesse and J

    S. Clesse and J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, GW190425, GW190521 and GW190814: Three candidate mergers of primordial black holes from the QCD epoch, Physics of the Dark Universe38, 101111 (2022), arXiv:2007.06481 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Franciolini, I

    G. Franciolini, I. Musco, P. Pani, and A. Urbano, From inflation to black hole mergers and back again: Gravitational-wave data-driven constraints on inflationary scenarios with a first- 23 principle model of primordial black holes across the QCD epoch, Phys. Rev. D106, 123526 ...

    2022 arXiv

  82. [90]

    H¨ utsi, M

    G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Two populations of LIGO-Virgo black holes, JCAP2021, 068 (2021), arXiv:2012.02786 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Kocsis, T

    B. Kocsis, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Hidden Universality in the Merger Rate Distribution in the Primordial Black Hole Scenario, Astrophys. J.854, 41 (2018), arXiv:1709.09007 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Bagui and S

    E. Bagui and S. Clesse, A boosted gravitational wave background for primordial black holes with broad mass distributions and thermal features, Physics of the Dark Universe38, 101115 (2022), arXiv:2110.07487 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  85. [93]

    A. Hall, A. D. Gow, and C. T. Byrnes, Bayesian analysis of LIGO-Virgo mergers: Pri- mordial versus astrophysical black hole populations, Phys. Rev. D102, 123524 (2020), arXiv:2008.13704 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Bagui, S

    E. Bagui, S. Clesse, V. De Luca, J. M. Ezquiaga, G. Franciolini, J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, C. Joana, R. Kumar Jain, S. Kuroyanagi, I. Musco, T. Papanikolaou, A. Raccanelli, S. Renaux-Petel, A. Riotto, E. Ruiz Morales, M. Scalisi, O. Sergijenko, C. ¨Unal, V. Vennin, D. Wands, and L...

    2025 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Carr and J

    B. Carr and J. Silk, Primordial black holes as generators of cosmic structures, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.478, 3756 (2018), arXiv:1801.00672 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Inman and Y

    D. Inman and Y. Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, Early structure formation in primordial black hole cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D100, 083528 (2019), arXiv:1907.08129 [astro-ph.CO]. 24

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.