Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 102 references

Chiral Magnons: Mechanisms and Research Progress

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Chiral magnons are spin waves with built-in directionality from broken momentum inversion, now unified under altermagnetism and spin-space symmetry as a route to non-reciprocal devices.

desk verdict Solid field map of chiral magnons that pairs altermagnet cases with a real MnF2 null control; useful synthesis, not a new result, with an aspirational device roadmap. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24963 v1 pith:XH3RWC42 submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.str-el

Wanxing Lin , Hanchen Deng , Bao-Tian Wang , Dao-Xin Yao This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords chiralmagnonsaltermagnetismnon-reciprocalpropagationspintransportspin-spacegroupDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionmagnonedgestatescavitymagnonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that chiral magnons—collective spin excitations whose frequency depends on the sign of their wavevector—form a distinct branch of magnonics from topological magnons. Their defining asymmetry, ω(k) ≠ ω(−k), and often a matching lifetime asymmetry, comes from three linked origins: conventional Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya coupling, non-relativistic long-range exchange in altermagnets, and the spin-space-group classification of magnetic order. The paper gathers symmetry rules, model Hamiltonians, first-principles spectra, neutron and light-scattering data, and transport measurements on materials such as CrSb, α-MnTe, RuO₂ and MnF₂ to show how that asymmetry maps onto directional spin Seebeck, spin Nernst and thermal Hall signals. It then shows how cavity hybrids, chiral spin pumping and non-Hermitian gain–loss competition can amplify the intrinsic non-reciprocity into device-scale isolation and routing. The practical stake is clear: if room-temperature platforms with usable splitting and long coherence can be stabilized, chiral magnons offer low-dissipation, one-way spin and microwave channels that do not rely on topological edge states.

What carries the argument

Momentum-inversion asymmetry of the magnon dispersion, ω(k) ≠ ω(−k), protected and classified by spin-space-group symmetry and realized either by DMI or by altermagnetic long-range exchange; this single spectral feature is what forces non-reciprocal group velocity, lifetime and transport tensors.

What would settle it

High-resolution inelastic or polarized neutron scattering on a candidate altermagnet (or strained film) that meets the stated targets—Néel temperature above 300 K, exchange above 10 meV, damping below 0.01—yet shows no resolvable ω(k) ≠ ω(−k) splitting or odd-in-k lifetime across the Brillouin zone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Chiral magnons are defined by momentum-inversion asymmetric dispersion ω(k) ≠ ω(−k) (and frequently Γ(k) ≠ Γ(−k)). This asymmetry is generated by three interrelated mechanisms—SOC-driven DMI, altermagnetic inequivalent long-range symmetric exchange without DMI, and spin-space-group constraints—and supplies intrinsic non-reciprocal propagation that is complementary to, but distinct from, Berry-curvature topological magnonics.

Load-bearing premise

That real materials can simultaneously deliver large enough splitting, long enough lifetime, and magnetic order above room temperature so the asymmetry survives in a working device.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SSG-guided screening plus strain or doping can push insulating altermagnets above ~10 meV splitting while keeping long lifetimes.
  • Direction-dependent spin Seebeck, spin Nernst and thermal Hall signals become quantitative read-outs of Δω(k) and Γ(k).
  • Chiral spin pumping and cascaded cavity-magnon hybrids can turn bulk asymmetry into GHz-to-THz unidirectional isolation.
  • Bulk-gap Berry curvature plus chiral dispersion together yield backscattering-immune edge channels usable for spin logic and quantum routing.
  • Non-Hermitian exceptional-point and skin-effect engineering supplies an extra handle on complex-frequency non-reciprocity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same SSG tables that flag electronic altermagnets can be re-used as a filter for magnon chirality, turning electronic databases into magnonic materials maps.
  • If metallic Stoner damping cannot be tamed, the practical path may bifurcate: high-energy metallic sensors versus low-energy insulating waveguides.
  • Odd-in-k lifetime components measured by BLS or neutron spin-echo could become a standard metrology for chiral damping, independent of peak-position splitting.
  • Geometric-phase engineering in curved waveguides or skyrmion lattices may relax the materials requirement by converting modest bulk asymmetry into large unidirectional transmittance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review (an English translation of an Acta Physica Sinica article) surveys chiral magnons — spin excitations whose dispersion breaks momentum-inversion symmetry, ω(k) ≠ ω(−k), often accompanied by asymmetric linewidth Γ(k) ≠ Γ(−k). It organizes the field around three microscopic origins (SOC-driven DMI; altermagnetic directionally inequivalent long-range symmetric exchange without DMI; and the spin-space-group classification framework), then compares representative materials (CrSb, α-MnTe, α-Fe2O3, RuO2, with MnF2 as a negative control), and covers topological/chiral edge states, transport observables (SSE, SNE, thermal Hall), and many-body/non-Hermitian extensions (mBEC stability, cavity magnonics, exceptional points). The review closes with a device-oriented outlook and screening targets for room-temperature platforms.

Significance. A timely and well-organized synthesis at the intersection of altermagnetism and magnonics, where no comparably broad review yet exists. The manuscript's main strengths: (i) a non-circular, empirically disciplined taxonomy in which each mechanism is tied to specific spectroscopic evidence with concrete energy scales (e.g., α-MnTe's 2–3 meV g-wave splitting, PRL 133, 156702); (ii) explicit inclusion of falsifying evidence — the MnF2 null result (Fig. 5), where high-resolution INS and PNS set only upper limits — which is exactly what a symmetry-based classification needs to remain honest; (iii) candid treatment of the CrSb case, flagging the LSWT (9 meV) vs LR-TDDFT (~30 meV) discrepancy and Stoner-continuum damping rather than quoting the larger number uncritically; and (iv) a useful materials/observables summary (Table 1) and a cross-platform metrology discussion (INS-BLS-RIXS joint calibration) that will be genuinely useful to experimentalists. The review is a synthesis, not a new result; its value is organization, calibration, and a credible research roadmap.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5, first subsection; Table 1 (RuO2 row); Refs. [22, 23]] The manuscript's claim that RuO2 enables, 'for the first time, the inference of the directional selectivity of Δω(k) and Γ(k) through transport measurements' (§3; reiterated in §5, 'Metallic RuO2 exhibits significant tensor sign reversal on the (001) and (110) crystal planes at 300 K') is undermined by internal ambiguity about what is experiment and what is theory. Table 1 lists the RuO2 row as '0 K (spectroscopic theory); 300 K (transport theory)' with observation method 'Spectroscopic modeling, spin-thermal transport measurements [22, 23]'. Ref. [22] (Šmejkal et al., PRL 131, 256703) is a first-principles prediction. The authors must state explicitly, for both the near-Γ chiral splitting and the SNE/SSE/thermal-Hall anisotropy, which results are measured and which are predicted, and correct Table 1 and the §5 wording accordingly. This is load-bearing because the spectroscopy–transport
  2. [Table 1 (α-MnTe row; missing α-Fe2O3 row)] The α-MnTe row cites 'High-resolution INS, LSWT, PNS [18–20]', but Refs. [18] and [19] are the INS experiment and an LSWT/modeling study, and Ref. [20] (McClarty et al., PRB 111, L060405) is a theory paper on MnF2 — none of these is a PNS measurement of α-MnTe. Since Table 1 is likely the single most-consulted element of the review, each row should be audited so that the cited methods match the cited references; the α-MnTe PNS entry should either be removed or given a correct source. Relatedly, the α-Fe2O3 material discussed in §3 (Fig. 4(a), Ref. [61]) is absent from Table 1 despite being presented as a key supporting case; it should be added for completeness.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4, opening paragraph] §4 explicitly covers topological edge states whose bulk dispersion satisfies ω(k) = ω(−k), i.e., outside the review's own defining criterion. The text does flag the complementarity, but the framing tension deserves one explicit sentence at the top of §4 (or in §1) stating that 'chiral edge state' is used in the broader literature sense and delineating its relation to the ω(k) ≠ ω(−k) criterion, so readers do not read §4 as contradicting the definition.
  2. [Fig. 7(c) and Fig. 9 captions] Text–caption mismatch: the text associates Fig. 7(c) with skyrmion-lattice reconfigurable switching (Refs. [75–77]), but the caption describes Fig. 7(c) as the ferroelectric-altermagnet schematic from Ref. [80]. Similarly, the Fig. 9 caption lists panels (a) and (b) and then the MnF2 Klein-tunneling panel without a '(c)' label. Please reconcile figure citations with captions throughout.
  3. [§7, second paragraph] The Summary's target parameters (TN > 300 K, J > 10 meV, α < 0.01) are screening goals, not demonstrated properties — no cited system simultaneously satisfies them (metallic candidates are Stoner-damped; insulating candidates sit at 2–3 meV). The text does call them 'metric thresholds [that] can be locked onto candidate systems', but one additional sentence stating plainly that no current material meets all three would prevent casual readers from citing the review as evidence that such materials exist.
  4. [Throughout] Scattered typography: 'alter magnets'/'alter magnetism' with a stray space appears several times (§2, §3, §7); Table 2's title reads 'multibody' where 'many-body' is meant; 'Fig.7' lacks a space. The sentence 'chiral magnons are evolved from intrinsic material properties...' (Abstract/§3) should be 'have evolved'.
  5. [§1, second paragraph; References] Refs. [24, 25] (the group's phonon-dynamics work) and the block [31–47] are introduced in §1 as group background; this is acceptable in a review but reads as tangential to the subject. Consider compressing to one sentence, and check whether the very recent arXiv items ([60], [62]) can be replaced with published versions at proof stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: review taxonomy organized around the community definition ω(k)≠ω(−k), supported by external experiments and a genuine negative control.

full rationale

This is a review/synthesis paper, not a primary derivation that fits parameters and then re-labels them as predictions. The central criterion ω(k)≠ω(−k) (and often Γ(k)≠Γ(−k)) is introduced as the defining feature of chiral magnons and then used to organize three literature mechanisms (SOC–DMI, altermagnetic long-range symmetric exchange, SSG classification). That is definitional framing for a survey, not a self-definitional loop in which a claimed prediction reduces to its inputs by construction. Load-bearing empirical content is drawn from external primary sources (e.g., INS g-wave splitting in α-MnTe, LR-TDDFT/LSWT CrSb with explicit Stoner-damping caveats, RuO2 transport anisotropy, and the MnF2 negative control with no resolvable splitting). Author self-citations appear as background on the group’s prior magnonics work and do not uniquely underwrite the mechanism taxonomy or the falsifying MnF2 case. No fitted-input-called-prediction, uniqueness-theorem import, or ansatz-smuggling chain is present. Score 0 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, load-bearing content is inherited domain framework rather than new postulates: spin-wave theory, DMI, altermagnetic spin splitting, SSG classification, and standard spectroscopic/transport probes. No new particle or force is invented; free parameters are those of the cited material models, not fits performed here.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Linear (and interacting) spin-wave theory on Heisenberg-type Hamiltonians correctly describes magnon dispersions and lifetimes in the ordered magnets discussed.
    Sections 2–3 and material comparisons rely on LSWT/LR-TDDFT dispersions as the observable baseline.
  • domain assumption Momentum-inversion asymmetry ω(k)≠ω(−k) (and optionally Γ(k)≠Γ(−k)) is the defining criterion of chiral magnons and implies non-reciprocal propagation.
    Stated in abstract and Introduction as the core criterion organizing the review.
  • domain assumption Altermagnetic order can produce magnon chirality via directionally inequivalent long-range symmetric exchange without requiring strong SOC/DMI.
    Section 2–3 central thread, following Šmejkal et al. and INS examples (α-MnTe, CrSb).
  • domain assumption Spin-space groups supply valid symmetry criteria for magnon degeneracy lifting and g/d-wave angular patterns in collinear magnets.
    Section 2 and material discussion use SSG taxonomy for screening and nodal structure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral Magnons: Mechanisms and Research Progress." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XH3RWC42

@misc{pith2026260724963,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral Magnons: Mechanisms and Research Progress},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XH3RWC42}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24963}
}
abstract

Chiral magnons are distinctive collective spin excitations in magnetic ordered systems, whose dispersion relations break momentum-inversion symmetry, $\omega(\boldsymbol{k}) \neq \omega(-\boldsymbol{k})$, resulting in essential non-reciprocal spin-wave propagation. This built-in directionality provides new opportunities for spin information transfer, thermal-spin interconversion, and low-dissipation non-reciprocal microwave devices, which complement but differ from topological magnonics. In recent years, the proposal and rapid development of altermagnetism have broadened the physical origin and research framework of chiral magnons, making them a research frontier in condensed matter physics. This review presents a unified framework for chiral magnons, covering symmetry-breaking mechanisms, material implementation, experimental characterization, transport response, and many-body non-Hermitian dynamics, and evaluates routes toward room-temperature and device-related platforms. The discussion is based on symmetry analysis, model Hamiltonians, and spin-wave theory, combined with first-principles calculations as well as recent spectroscopic (e.g., inelastic and polarized neutron scattering, Brillouin light scattering) and transport measurements. This review further summarizes bulk-gap and Berry-curvature induced chiral magnon edge states, the enhancement of non-reciprocity via chiral spin pumping and cavity-magnon hybrids, as well as non-Hermitian features arising from multiparticle damping and gain-loss competition. This review provides a comprehensive reference for elucidating the underlying mechanisms of chiral magnons, advancing the synthesis and experimental characterization of novel materials, and also guiding the design of next-generation non-reciprocal magnonic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24963 by the authors.

Figure 6
Figure 6. Engineering the nonreciprocal propagation of chiral magnons: (a) Schematic of the device structure, two coplanar waveguide antennas are fabricated on a Co nanowire grating, which enables unidirectional propagation and chiral injection of spin waves into the yttrium iron garnet film, reproduced with permission from Ref.[27]; (b) schematic of the chiral spin pumping and thermal pumping, reproduced with permission from… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Fig.7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. (a) SNE coefficients depend on temperature and 𝐽2 − 𝐽2 ′ , reproduced with permission from Ref.[83]; (b) modulation for chirality of magnon and the spin pumping voltage V(H) signal by recurrent switching of external field H, reproduced with open access from Ref.[86]; (c) chiral-selective magnon￾phonon mixing in layered zigzag AFM shows a significant contrast with DCP, reproduced with open access from Ref.[29] . 6 Ma… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [22]

    Šmejkal L, Marmodoro A, Ahn K H, González-Hernández R, Turek I, Mankovsky S, Ebert H, D'Souza S W, Šipr O, Sinova J, Jungwirth T 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 256703

    2023

  2. [18]

    Liu Z, Ozeki M, Asai S, Itoh S, Masuda T 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 156702

    2024

  3. [19]

    Alaei M, Sobieszczyk P, Ptok A, Rezaei N, Oganov A R, Qaiumzadeh A 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 104416 30

    2025

  4. [20]

    McClarty P A, Gukasov A, Rau J G 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 L060405

    2025

  5. [61]

    Sun Q, Guo J, Wang D, Abernathy D L, Tian W, Li C 2025 Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 186703

    2025

  6. [1]

    Van Kranendonk J, Van Vleck J H 1958 Rev. Mod. Phys. 30 1

    1958

  7. [2]

    B 29 117102

    Li L Y, Chen L N, Liu R H, Du Y W 2020 Chinese Phys. B 29 117102

    2020

  8. [3]

    Chisnell R, Helton J S, Freedman D E, Singh D K, Bewley R I, Nocera D G, Lee Y S 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 147201

    2015

Show all 102 references
  1. [4]

    Li F Y, Li Y D, Kim Y B, Balents L, Yu Y, Chen G 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12691

    2016

  2. [5]

    Li B, Kovalev A A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 174413

    2018

  3. [6]

    Hu Z Q, Fu L, Liu L Q 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 217201

    2022

  4. [7]

    B 34 037301

    Hua C, Xu D H 2025 Chinese Phys. B 34 037301

    2025

  5. [8]

    B 34 067506

    Fu H S, Zhang L C, Mrad R, Xie Y E, Chen Y P 2025 Chinese Phys. B 34 067506

    2025

  6. [9]

    Wang Z Y, Li Z X, Yuan H Y, Zhang Z Z, Cao Y S, Yan P 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 057503 (in Chinese)

    2023

  7. [10]

    Yu T, Luo Z C, Bauer G E W 2023 Phys. Rep. 1009 1

    2023

  8. [11]

    2025 Nat

    Zhang Y L, Qiu L, Chen J L, et al. 2025 Nat. Mater. 24 69

    2025

  9. [12]

    Šmejkal L, Sinova J, Jungwirth T 2022 Phys. Rev. X 12 031042

    2022

  10. [13]

    Šmejkal L, Sinova J, Jungwirth T 2022 Phys. Rev. X 12 040501

    2022

  11. [14]

    Song C, Bai H, Zhou Z Y, Han L, Reichlova H, Dil J H, Liu J W, Chen X Z, Pan F 2025 Nat. Rev. Mater. 10 473

    2025

  12. [15]

    Bai H, Song C 2025 Chin. Sci. Bull. 70 4156 (in Chinese)

    2025

  13. [16]

    Dai J K, Han L, Zhou Z Y, Wang Y Y, Pan F, Song C 2026 Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 56 227503 (in Chinese)

    2026

  14. [17]

    Zhang Y F, Ni X S, Chen K, Cao K 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 174451

    2025

  15. [21]

    Morano V C, Maesen Z, Nikitin S E, Lass J, Mazzone D G, Zaharko O 2025 Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 226702

    2025

  16. [23]

    Wu K, Dong J T, Zhu M, Zheng F X, Zhang J 2025 Chinese Phys. Lett. 42 070702

    2025

  17. [24]

    2020 Nat

    Li X Y, Liu P F, Zhao E Y, et al. 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 942

    2020

  18. [25]

    2024 Natl

    Liu P F, Li X, Li J, et al. 2024 Natl. Sci. Rev. 11 nwae216

    2024

  19. [26]

    2009 Nucl

    Wei J, Chen H S, Chen Y W, et al. 2009 Nucl. Inst. Meth. in Phys. Res. Sect. A 600 10

    2009

  20. [27]

    2021 ACS Nano 15 9076

    Wang H C, Madami M, Chen J L, et al. 2021 ACS Nano 15 9076

    2021

  21. [28]

    Cahaya A B 2025 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 58 345002

    2025

  22. [29]

    2023 Nat

    Cui J, Boström E V, Ozerov M, et al. 2023 Nat. Commun. 14 3396

    2023

  23. [30]

    2020 Phys

    Nambu Y, Barker J, Okino Y, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 027201

    2020

  24. [31]

    Luo C, Datta T, Huang Z Y, Yao D X 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 035109

    2015

  25. [32]

    Xiong Z J, Datta T, Stiwinter K, Yao D X 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 144436

    2017

  26. [33]

    Phys.: Condens

    Huang Z Y, Mongan S, Datta T, Yao D X 2017 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29 505802

    2017

  27. [34]

    Xiong Z J, Datta T, Yao D X 2020 npj Quantum Mater. 5 78

    2020

  28. [35]

    Qi K Y, Jin S, Datta T, Yao D X 2025 Phys. Rev. B 112 134438

    2025

  29. [36]

    Li J L, Jin S, Datta T, Yao D X 2023 Phys. Rev. B 107 184402

    2023

  30. [37]

    Chang Y Y, Cheng J Q, Shao H, Yao D X, Wu H Q 2024 Front. Phys. 19 63202

    2024

  31. [38]

    Li J L, Datta T, Yao D X 2021 Phys. Rev. Research 3 023248

    2021

  32. [39]

    Zhang M H, Yao D X 2023 Phys. Rev. B 107 024408 31

    2023

  33. [40]

    Zhang M H, Yao D X 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 144407

    2023

  34. [41]

    Guo X, Zhang M H, Yao D X 2025 Chinese Phys. Lett. 42 120703

    2025

  35. [42]

    Zhang M H, Xiao L, Yao D X 2026 Sci. Bull. (In Press)

    2026

  36. [43]

    Zhang J H, Zhang M H, Li P G, Liu Z Z, Tao Y, Wang H K, Yao D X, Guo D H, Zhong D Y 2026 ACS Nano 20 700

    2026

  37. [44]

    Shan C, Jin S, Datta T, Yao D X 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 024417

    2021

  38. [45]

    Wu M, Gong S S, Yao D X, Wu H Q 2022 Phys. Rev. B 106 125129

    2022

  39. [46]

    Zhang Y F, Ni X S, Datta T, Wang M, Yao D X, Cao K 2022 Phys. Rev. B 106 184422

    2022

  40. [47]

    He L Y, Ye X M, Yao D X 2025 Front. Phys. 20 054501

    2025

  41. [48]

    2023 Appl

    Li Y, Lo T H, Lim J, et al. 2023 Appl. Phys. Lett. 123

    2023

  42. [49]

    Wang W D, Shen K 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 094413

    2025

  43. [50]

    Li Y, Wang W D, Liu C, Chen A T, Zheng D X, Yang T, Tang M, Fang B, Ma Y C, Shen K, Manchon A, Qiu Z Q, Zhang X X 2025 Adv. Mater. 37 2416190

    2025

  44. [51]

    2023 Phys

    Lu Z W, Miranda I P, Streib S, et al. 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 014433

    2023

  45. [52]

    Ye X Y, Xia K, Bauer G E W, Yu T 2024 Phys. Rev. Applied 22 L011001

    2024

  46. [53]

    Hou Y B, Ren Y L, Xie J K, Ma S L, Li F L, Li P B 2025 EPL 149 45002

    2025

  47. [54]

    Biniskos N, dos Santos Dias M, Agrestini S, Sviták D, Zhou K J, Pospíšil J, Čermák P 2025 Nat. Commun. 16 9311

    2025

  48. [55]

    Kawano M, Onose Y, Hotta C 2019 Commun. Phys. 2 27

    2019

  49. [56]

    Chen X B, Liu Y T, Liu P F, Yu Y T, Ren J, Li J Y, Zhang A, Liu Q H 2025 Nature 640 349

    2025

  50. [57]

    Yuan L D, Wang Z, Luo J W, Zunger A 2021 Phys. Rev. Materials 5 014409

    2021

  51. [58]

    Jin Z, Zeng Z, Liu J, Gong T, Su Y, Chang K, Yan P 2026 Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 086703 32

    2026

  52. [59]

    Beida W, Şaşıoğlu E, Friedrich C, Bihlmayer G, Mokrousov Y, Blügel S 2025 npj Quantum Mater. 10 97

    2025

  53. [60]

    Tas M 2025 arXiv 2510.03759

    2025

  54. [62]

    Faure Q, Bounoua D, Balédent V, Gukasov A, Ovidiu Garlea V, Ribeiro A, Rau J G, Petit S, McClarty P 2025 arXiv 2509.07087

    2025 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Kravchuk V P, Yershov K V, Facio J I, Guo Y, Janson O, Gomonay O, Sinova J, van den Brink J 2025 Phys. Rev. B 112 144421

    2025

  56. [64]

    Yu T, Blanter Y M, Bauer G E W 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 247202

    2019

  57. [65]

    Yu T, Wang H C, Sentef M A, Yu H M, Bauer G E W 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 054429

    2020

  58. [66]

    Yu T, Zhang X, Sharma S, Blanter Y M, Bauer G E W 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 094414

    2020

  59. [67]

    Zhang X F, Galda A, Han X, Jin D F, Vinokur V M 2020 Phys. Rev. Applied 13 044039

    2020

  60. [68]

    Prajapati D, Banerjee C 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 224410

    2024

  61. [69]

    Pirro P, Vasyuchka V I, Serga A A, Hillebrands B 2021 Nat. Rev. Mater. 6 1114

    2021

  62. [70]

    2021 Nat

    Sala G, Stone M B, Rai B K, et al. 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 171

    2021

  63. [71]

    Brehm V, Sobieszczyk P, Qaiumzadeh A 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 144415

    2025

  64. [72]

    McClarty P A, Dong X Y, Gohlke M, Rau J G, Pollmann F, Moessner R, Penc K 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 060404

    2018

  65. [73]

    Jin H K, Kadow W, Knap M, Knolle J 2024 npj Quantum Mater. 9 65

    2024

  66. [74]

    Mella J D, Torres L E F F, Troncoso R E 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 104433

    2024

  67. [75]

    Kim S K, Tserkovnyak Y 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 077204 33

    2017

  68. [76]

    Li Z X, Wang C, Cao Y, Yan P 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 180407

    2018

  69. [77]

    Kong L Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 137506

    2018

  70. [78]

    Owerre S A, Mellado P, Baskaran G 2019 EPL 126 27002

    2019

  71. [79]

    Martinez-Berumen I, Coish W A, Pereg-Barnea T 2026 Phys. Rev. B 113 104419

    2026

  72. [80]

    25 14618

    Wang S, Wang W W, Fan J, Zhou X, Li X P, Wang L 2025 Nano Lett. 25 14618

    2025

  73. [81]

    Owerre S A 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 6931

    2017

  74. [82]

    2024 Acta Phys

    Shi H C, Tang B, Liu C F. 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 137501 (in Chinese)

    2024

  75. [83]

    Cui Q R, Zeng B W, Cui P, Yu T, Yang H X 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 L180401

    2023

  76. [84]

    Yao D, Yokoyama T 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 L060404

    2025

  77. [85]

    Wang L D, Shen L C, Bai H, Zhou H A, Shen K, Jiang W J 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 166705

    2024

  78. [86]

    Liu Y H, Xu Z M, Liu L, Zhang K, Meng Y, Sun Y W, Gao P, Zhao H W, Niu Q, Li J 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 1264

    2022

  79. [87]

    2025 Nature 644 83

    Kepaptsoglou D, Castellanos-Reyes J Á, Kerrigan A, et al. 2025 Nature 644 83

    2025

  80. [88]

    Bayrakci S P, Keller T, Habicht K, Keimer B 2006 Science 312 1926

    2006

  81. [89]

    Holbein S, Steffens P, Biesenkamp S, Ollivier J, Komarek A C, Baum M, Braden M 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 104404

    2023

  82. [90]

    2024 Phys

    Kim D Y, Berrai I, Suraj T S, et al. 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 156704

    2024

  83. [91]

    Shen H T, Zhen B, Fu L 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 146402

    2018

  84. [92]

    Bergholtz E J, Budich J C, Kunst F K 2021 Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 015005

    2021

  85. [93]

    Meng C H, An Z H 2025 Nat. Phys. 21 1516

    2025

  86. [94]

    Hu Y M, Song F, Wang Z 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 230307

    2021

  87. [95]

    Yu T, Zou J, Zeng B W, Rao J W, Xia K 2024 Phys. Rep. 1062 1

    2024

  88. [96]

    Frostad T, Kristoffersen A L, Brehm V, Troncoso R E, Brataas A, Qaiumzadeh A 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 184402 34

    2025

  89. [97]

    Yu W C, Yu T, Bauer G E W 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 064416

    2020

  90. [98]

    Quantum Technol

    Yang G, Guan S Y, Han X, Wang T, Zhang S, Wang H F 2025 Adv. Quantum Technol. 8 2400702

    2025

  91. [99]

    Huang K W, Wang X, Qiu Q Y, Xiong H 2024 Opt. Lett. 49 758

    2024

  92. [100]

    Sui C W, Yuan S H, Gao D Q, Yu D X, Jia C L 2025 Phys. Rev. B 112 174407

    2025

  93. [101]

    Jin Z J, Gong T C, Liu J, Yang H H, Zeng Z Z, Cao Y S, Yan P 2025 Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 126702

    2025

  94. [102]

    Sødequist J, Olsen T 2024 Appl. Phys. Lett. 124 182409

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.