pith. sign in

arxiv: 1006.4862 · v3 · pith:XIDOH5URnew · submitted 2010-06-24 · 🧮 math.CA · math.CO

Small Furstenberg sets

classification 🧮 math.CA math.CO
keywords alphagammadimensionfurstenbergfrachausdorffsetsbeta
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

For $\alpha$ in $(0,1]$, a subset $E$ of $\RR$ is called Furstenberg set of type $\alpha$ or $F_\alpha$-set if for each direction $e$ in the unit circle there is a line segment $\ell_e$ in the direction of $e$ such that the Hausdorff dimension of the set $E\cap\ell_e$ is greater or equal than $\alpha$. In this paper we show that if $\alpha > 0$, there exists a set $E\in F_\alpha$ such that $\HH{g}(E)=0$ for $g(x)=x^{1/2+3/2\alpha}\log^{-\theta}(\frac{1}{x})$, $\theta>\frac{1+3\alpha}{2}$, which improves on the the previously known bound, that $H^{\beta}(E) = 0$ for $\beta>1/2+3/2\alpha$. Further, by refining the argument in a subtle way, we are able to obtain a sharp dimension estimate for a whole class of zero-dimensional Furstenberg type sets. Namely, for $\h_\gamma(x)=\log^{-\gamma}(\frac{1}{x})$, $\gamma>0$, we construct a set $E_\gamma\in F_{\h_\gamma}$ of Hausdorff dimension not greater than 1/2. Since in a previous work we showed that 1/2 is a lower bound for the Hausdorff dimension of any $E\in F_{\h_\gamma}$, with the present construction, the value 1/2 is sharp for the whole class of Furstenberg sets associated to the zero dimensional functions $\h_\gamma$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.