Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

EWOCS-III: JWST observations of the supermassive star cluster Westerlund 1

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read JWST observations of the supermassive cluster Westerlund 1 reach a 50% completeness limit of 23.8 mag in F115W, corresponding to about 0.06 solar masses and reaching the brown-dwarf regime, while MIRI resolves shells and outflows around…

desk verdict First JWST census of Westerlund 1, but the headline 0.06 Msol brown-dwarf claim is not yet supported by the paper's own completeness work. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13051 v1 pith:XLMEXUQE submitted 2024-11-20 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

M. G. Guarcello , V. Almendros-Abad , J. B. Lovell , K. Monsch , K. Muzic , J. R. Martiinez-Galarza , J. J. Drake , K. Anastasopoulou
show 24 more authors
M. Andersen C. Argiroffi A. Bayo R. Bonito D. Capela F. Damiani M. Gennaro A. Ginsburg E. K. Grebel J. L. Hora E. Moraux F. Najarro I. Negueruela L. Prisinzano N. D. Richardson B. Ritchie M. Robberto T. Rom E. Sabbi S. Sciortino G. Umana A. Winter N. J. Wright P. Zeidler
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords Westerlund1browndwarfsJWSTNIRCamMIRIsupermassivestarclustersinitialmassfunctioncircumstellarshellsX-raycounterparts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Westerlund 1 is the closest supermassive star cluster to the Sun, but until now its faint, low-mass members could not be separated from foreground and background stars. This paper presents JWST NIRCam and MIRI observations designed to reach the brown-dwarf regime, and reports that the F115W images are 50% complete at 23.8 mag, a depth that the authors translate to about 0.06 solar masses at the cluster's distance and extinction. The color-magnitude diagrams show a well-defined cluster sequence, anchored by 1828 NIRCam stars with X-ray counterparts. The same observations resolve diffuse nebular emission made of droplet-like features and a pillar, as well as dusty shells and outflows around several evolved massive stars. If the depth claim holds, this opens the substellar regime of a supermassive cluster to a direct census, with consequences for the initial mass function and disk evolution in starburst-like environments.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on the photometric cluster sequence in the NIRCam color-magnitude diagrams. Sources detected with DOLPHOT point-spread-function photometry in the F115W, F277W, and F444W filters are placed in color-magnitude space, and the locus of true cluster members is marked by the 1828 sources that have X-ray counterparts in the Chandra/ACIS-I catalog, matched with a maximum-likelihood procedure that also uses magnitude information. The photometric depth is calibrated by the 50% completeness limit in F115W, and the conversion of that limit to a mass uses the adopted pre-main-sequence isochrone shifted to the cluster distance and reddening; the isochrone comparison also defines where the low-mass sequence enters the substellar regime.

What would settle it

Recalculate the mass at the 50% completeness limit using the roughly 10-Myr cluster age from the literature, keeping the same distance and extinction: if the resulting mass exceeds the hydrogen-burning limit (about 0.075 solar masses), the stated 0.06-solar-mass brown-dwarf reach does not hold for that age. Observationally, spectroscopically classify a sample of candidate members near 23.8 mag in F115W: the presence of L-type (or later) photospheric features would confirm substellar members at the claimed depth, while their absence would place the true substellar cutoff at a brighter magnitude.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the new NIRCam images of Westerlund 1 are deep enough to detect the cluster's brown dwarfs: at a 50% completeness limit of 23.8 mag in F115W, the adopted model isochrone at the cluster distance (4230 pc) and extinction (AV = 10 mag) places that limit at roughly 0.06 solar masses, below the hydrogen-burning boundary. The cluster sequence in the NIRCam color-magnitude diagrams is clearly visible, and its upper part is populated by 1828 NIRCam sources with X-ray counterparts identified through a maximum-likelihood match with the Chandra/ACIS-I catalog, which independently ties the sequence to the cluster rather than to field contamination. Alongside the photometric census, the MIRI images reveal diffuse nebular emission made of droplet-like features pointing at the massive-star groups, a long pillar, and resolved shells and outflows around the red supergiants W20, W26, W75, and W237, the sgB[e] star W9, and the yellow hypergiant W4, several of which were previously known only at lower resolution. The authors present these results as the data foundation for upcoming EWOCS papers on the cluster's initial mass function, disk population, and the nature of the nebulosity.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the survey reaches the brown-dwarf regime hinges on the assumed distance (4230 pc), extinction (AV = 10 mag), and the age of the adopted low-mass isochrone, which appears as 5 Myr in Sect. 3.1 but as 2 Myr in Sect. 4; if the cluster is as old as the roughly 10-Myr age argued elsewhere or the extinction differs, the same 23.8-mag limit corresponds to a higher mass and may lie above the hydrogen-burning boundary.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The cluster's low-mass stellar and substellar population can be separated from foreground and background stars, allowing the initial mass function of a supermassive cluster to be measured down to roughly 0.06 solar masses.
  • With the cluster sequence and X-ray members in hand, protoplanetary disks can be selected and studied in an environment containing dozens of massive stars, testing whether disk lifetimes and planet formation are suppressed in starburst-like conditions.
  • The resolved MIRI shells and outflows around W20, W26, W75, W237, W9, and W4 provide direct morphological evidence of mass loss from evolved massive stars and of external feedback shaping that ejecta.
  • The droplet-like nebulosity and the pillar trace wind-wind and wind-cloud interactions in the cluster, giving a qualitative picture that can be tested by the upcoming dynamical and compositional analysis.
  • The X-ray-to-NIRCam match catalog, with its multiple-match cases resolved on the basis of color and X-ray hardness, anchors membership studies and multiwavelength follow-up across an order of magnitude in mass.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the completeness limit really corresponds to 0.06 solar masses, similar NIRCam depths could resolve low-mass and substellar populations in other supermassive clusters and young massive clusters in the Local Group, extending this census well beyond Westerlund 1.
  • The internal age discrepancy (the same mass conversion is quoted with a 5-Myr isochrone in Sect. 3.1 and a 2-Myr isochrone in Sect. 4) means the claimed substellar reach is coupled to an uncertain age; an independent age estimate would tighten or shift the quoted mass limit.
  • Deeper MIRI imaging of the droplet features could distinguish among the three proposed origins (parental cloud remnants, wind material from Wolf-Rayet and supergiant stars, and supernova ejecta) by measuring the droplets' proper motions and dust temperatures.
  • The X-ray-selected sample likely undercounts the faint end of the cluster sequence because X-ray emission from low-mass members is flare-dominated; a control-field-subtracted photometric analysis will recover additional candidates, which the forthcoming IMF paper can compare against the X-ray-selected sample.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST/NIRCam and MIRI observations of the supermassive star cluster Westerlund 1 from program GO-1905. It describes a detailed reduction workflow (JWST pipeline plus custom artifact removal), DOLPHOT PSF photometry, and a maximum-likelihood cross-match with the Chandra/ACIS-I X-ray catalog. The main results are a NIRCam color-magnitude diagram showing a cluster sequence marked by X-ray counterparts, an array of MIRI nebular structures around the cluster and resolved shells/outflows around evolved massive stars, and the claim that the F115W data reach a 50% completeness limit of 23.8 mag, corresponding to roughly 0.06 Msol, i.e., the brown-dwarf regime.

Significance. If the completeness and isochrone-conversion claims hold, this would be one of the first JWST-based demonstrations that a Galactic supermassive cluster can be probed into the substellar regime, and the MIRI images of shells and outflows are a valuable new resource for studying massive-star feedback. The reduction workflow is described in enough detail to be reproducible, the X-ray matching procedure is carefully designed with reliability estimates, and the paper is honest in the body about the preliminary nature of the completeness estimate. However, the abstract and conclusions elevate a preliminary, internally inconsistent quantitative claim to a headline result, so the significance as stated is not yet fully supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1 and §4] The paper gives two inconsistent versions of the isochrone conversion that underlies the abstract's central quantitative claim. In §3.1, the 50% completeness limit at F115W=23.8 mag is converted to 0.06 Msol using the 5 Myr Baraffe et al. (2015) isochrone at d=4230 pc and A_V=10 mag. In §4, the same limit and the same mass are quoted on the 2 Myr isochrone at the same distance and extinction. A single apparent magnitude cannot generally map to the same mass on pre-main-sequence isochrones of different ages, because low-mass stars fade as they contract; the age inconsistency therefore changes the inferred mass. This matters because §1 acknowledges the 5 Myr versus 10 Myr age debate, and the abstract's claim that the observations reach the brown-dwarf regime depends on the adopted age. Please adopt one isochrone age consistently and quote the implied mass range across the allowed 2–10 Myr range, including the 10 Myr case of Beasor et al. (2021).
  2. [§3.1 and Abstract] The 50% completeness limit of 23.8 mag in F115W is stated in the abstract and conclusions as a result of this paper, but the artificial-star-test measurement is not presented. §3.1 states that the AST "will be described in detail in an upcoming paper" and that 23.8 mag is a preliminary spatial average that "poorly represents the spatial variation of completeness due to crowding and bright saturated stars." As written, the central quantitative claim cannot be independently checked from the published material. Please include the AST recovery fractions, the magnitude binning, and a spatial completeness map in this paper, or explicitly qualify the abstract and conclusions so that the limit is presented as a preliminary estimate rather than a demonstrated result.
  3. [Abstract vs §3.1/Appendix C] The number of NIRCam stars with X-ray counterparts is given as 1828 in the abstract, while §3.1 reports 2170 matches, 2074 of them single, from the 3888 X-ray sources in the NIRCam field, and Appendix C repeats the total of 2170. The difference is not explained; if 1828 is the number after additional photometric or quality cuts, that selection should be stated explicitly. As it stands, the headline number for the cluster sequence is internally inconsistent.
  4. [§3.1] The claim that the diagonal population with F115W>21 and 0.6<F277W-F444W<1.0 "could contain most of the cluster members down to the substellar regime" is based on a qualitative overlap of isochrones and the X-ray-defined locus, with no quantitative decontamination using the control field, no membership probability map, and no color-color selection presented. Since the paper's stated aim is to reach the brown-dwarf regime, the substellar identification should be either supported by quantitative selection or explicitly framed as a preliminary inference for future papers.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 and §3.1] The Figure 3 caption lists PARSEC isochrones with ages 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 Myr, while the text in §3.1 says the isochrones are between 2 and 10 Myr; please align the ages.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected, including "nivel opportunity" in the Introduction, "fromg data" in §3.2, and "acknowledgs" in the Acknowledgements.
  3. [Abstract and §3.2] The structure described as a "long pillar" in the Abstract is referred to as an "elongated trunk" and a "pillar" in different places in §3.2; please adopt consistent terminology.
  4. [Appendix C] The maximum-likelihood matching procedure is described in detail, but reporting the fraction of spurious matches expected at the adopted reliability threshold would help the reader assess the purity of the 2170 matches.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the completeness-to-mass conversion uses external isochrones, distance, and extinction, and the cluster sequence is anchored by independent Chandra X-ray data.

full rationale

This paper is an observational survey presentation rather than a derivation, so the circularity tests apply mainly to the quoted completeness and mass limits, and to the X-ray-anchored cluster sequence. The 50% completeness value (F115W ≈ 23.8 mag, Sect. 3.1) is converted to ≈0.06 Msol using the external Baraffe et al. (2015) isochrone at d = 4230 pc and Av = 10 mag; distance, extinction, and isochrone are taken from outside the present analysis, and the completeness itself is a photometric measurement and artificial-star estimate, not a fitted parameter later renamed as a prediction. The cluster sequence is marked using NIRCam sources with Chandra/ACIS-I X-ray counterparts from Guarcello et al. (2024); that X-ray catalog is independent observational data from the same survey but not derived from the NIRCam photometry, and the maximum-likelihood matching follows Guarcello et al. (2023) and Smith et al. (2011), neither of which is invoked as a uniqueness theorem that forbids alternatives. The only self-citations are to the survey's own X-ray catalog and to a previously published matching method; neither is load-bearing in the sense of supplying the claimed result by construction. Caveats exist but are not circular: Sect. 3.1 uses a 5 Myr Baraffe isochrone for the 0.06 Msol conversion while Sect. 4 states the same mass on the 2 Myr isochrone, the artificial-star completeness analysis is deferred to a future paper so the 23.8 mag value is only a preliminary average, and the abstract's 1828 X-ray counterparts differ numerically from the 2170 matches (2074 single) reported in Sect. 3.1. These affect robustness and internal consistency, but they do not reduce the claim to its inputs; no equation or definition in the paper equates a derived quantity to a fitted or self-cited quantity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central quantitative result, the 0.06 Msol substellar mass limit, rests on adopted cluster distance, extinction, and age, on stellar model isochrones, and on the assumption that X-ray selected and quality-cut sources trace the cluster sequence. These are external inputs rather than measured values, and the age inconsistency directly affects the headline number.

free parameters (2)
  • Adopted visual extinction A_V = 10 mag
    Hand-picked value used to shift PARSEC and Baraffe isochrones and to convert F115W magnitude to mass in Sect. 3.1; the 0.06 Msol limit depends on it.
  • Adopted isochrone age = 5 Myr (Sect. 3.1), 2 Myr (Sect. 4)
    The completeness limit is translated to mass using the chosen Baraffe isochrone; the paper is internally inconsistent about the age, which affects the inferred mass.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Distance to Westerlund 1 is 4230 pc.
    Adopted from Negueruela et al. (2022) and used in Sect. 3.1 to convert angular completeness to physical mass and to place isochrones.
  • domain assumption The Baraffe et al. (2015) and PARSEC isochrones correctly predict NIRCam magnitudes for low-mass cluster members.
    Used to map F115W magnitude to mass in Sect. 3.1; this is model-dependent.
  • domain assumption X-ray emission marks genuine cluster members.
    The cluster sequence in Fig. 3 is marked using NIRCam sources with Chandra counterparts; X-ray flaring variability and incompleteness are acknowledged in Sect. 3.1.
  • domain assumption The DOLPHOT photometric quality cuts (sharpness, roundness, chi2, crowding <=0.3) preserve real sources and reject only spurious ones.
    Only about 10% of detected sources survive the cuts (Sect. 2.2); if the cuts are too aggressive, faint cluster members are lost from the CMD.
  • domain assumption The control field is representative of the foreground and background contamination toward Westerlund 1.
    Used in Sect. 3.1 and Fig. 4 to separate cluster members from contaminating populations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EWOCS-III: JWST observations of the supermassive star cluster Westerlund 1." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XLMEXUQE

@misc{pith2026241113051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EWOCS-III: JWST observations of the supermassive star cluster Westerlund 1},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XLMEXUQE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13051}
}
read the original abstract

The typically large distances, extinction, and crowding of Galactic supermassive star clusters have so far hampered the identification of their very low mass members, required to extend our understanding of star and planet formation, and early stellar evolution, to starburst. This situation has now evolved thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), and its unmatched resolution and sensitivity in the infrared. In this paper, the third of the series of the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS), we present JWST/NIRCam and JWST/MIRI observations of the supermassive star cluster Westerlund 1. These observations are specifically designed to unveil the cluster members down to the BD mass regime, and to allow us to select and study the protoplanetary disks and to study the mutual feedback between the cluster members and the surrounding environment. Westerlund 1 was observed as part of JWST GO-1905 for 23.6 hours. The data have been reduced using the JWST calibration pipeline, together with specific tools necessary to remove artifacts. Source identification and photometry were performed with DOLPHOT. The MIRI images show a plethora of different features. Diffuse nebular emission is observed around the cluster, which is typically composed of myriads of droplet-like features pointing toward the cluster center or the group of massive stars surrounding the WR star W72/A. A long pillar is also observed in the NW. The MIRI images also show resolved shells and outflows surrounding the M-type RSG W20, W26, W75, and W237, the sgB[e] star W9 and the YHG W4. The color-magnitude diagrams built using the NIRCam photometry show a clear cluster sequence, which is marked in its upper part by the 1828 NIRCam stars with X-ray counterparts. NIRCam observations using the F115W filter have reached the 23.8 mag limit with 50\% completeness (roughly corresponding to a 0.06 Msol brown dwarf).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13051 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. RGB NIRCam image of Westerlund 1 (red: F444W, green: F323N, blue: F277W). At 4230 pc, the angular size of this image spans an area of 7.4×7.4 pc. Westerlund 1, whilst aiming to minimize the inevitable satura￾tion from bright stellar sources. The uncal.fits files produced by the each pointing were analyzed as described in Sect. 2.1, with Guide Star Catalog version 2431. The reduction of MIRI data and the production o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Combined NIRCam/MIRI RGB image of Westerlund 1 (red: F1130W, green: F770W, blue: F444W). At 4230 pc, the angular size of this image spans an area of 4.3×4.9 pc. Article number, page 5 of 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. NIRCam color–magnitude diagram of the sources in the West￾erlund 1 field (gray dots). The red symbols mark the colors and mag￾nitudes of the NIRCam sources with an X-ray counterpart. The dashed lines are PARSEC isochrones with ages of 1 (top), 3, 5, 7, and 9 Myr (bottom), drawn adopting a distance of 4230 pc and AV=10 mag. The magnitudes corresponding to the masses on the left are taken from the 5 Myr isochrones. Th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: NIRCam color–magnitude diagram of the sources in the Wester￾lund 1 field (top panel) and in the control field (bottom panel). Symbols as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: MIRI image of Westerlund 1 taken with the JWST/MIRI F1000W filter. The black polygons delineate the nebulosity regions discussed in the text. Purple circles indicate the positions of the massive stars listed by Clark et al. (2020), with WR star positions highlighted in…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: NIRCam RGB images of the pillar in the western cloud. Left panel: Red F466N, green F405N, blue F200W. Right panel: Red F1130W, green F1000W, and blue F770W, created using stage 1 data in order to avoid saturation. projected distances of about 0.4 and 0.6 pc from the in…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: JWST MIRI images in the F1130W filter of the resolved stellar outflows in the four M-type supergiants of Westerlund 1. In the same panel as W26, the asymmetric outflow from W9 is also visible on the right-hand side of the image. Each panel has a size of 40′′×40′′ . The…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MIRI RGB stage 1 image of the nebulosity associated with the M-type supergiant W26. The positions of the surrounding massive stars, along with the “triangular nebula”, are marked. 1 (GO-1905). The observations are designed to maximize the sensitivity toward the stars w…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why do massive stars form bow shocks? Bulk ISM motion as the main driver of bow shock formation and geometry

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bulk interstellar gas motion, not stellar motion, dominates most massive star bow shocks; only about 21% are classical aligned bow shocks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2017, A&A, 60 2, A22

    Andersen, M., Gennaro, M., Brandner, W., et al. 2017, A&A, 60 2, A22

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    K., Clark, J

    Andrews, H., Fenech, D., Prinja, R. K., Clark, J. S., & Hindso n, L. 2019, A&A, 632, A38 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P . L., et a l. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip ˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P ., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    V ., Bykov, A

    Badmaev, D. V ., Bykov, A. M., & Kalyashova, M. E. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 2818 Baraffe, I., Homeier, D., Allard, F., & Chabrier, G. 2015, A&A, 577, A42

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    R., Davies, B., Smith, N., Gehrz, R

    Beasor, E. R., Davies, B., Smith, N., Gehrz, R. D., & Figer, D. F. 2021, ApJ, 912, 16

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    S., Stolte, A., et al

    Brandner, W., Clark, J. S., Stolte, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 478, 137

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    2012, MNRAS, 427 , 127

    Bressan, A., Marigo, P ., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427 , 127

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    2024, JWS T Calibration Pipeline

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2024, JWS T Calibration Pipeline

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    S., Fender, R

    Clark, J. S., Fender, R. P ., Waters, L. B. F. M., et al. 1998, MN RAS, 299, L43

    work page 1998

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    S., Negueruela, I., Crowther, P

    Clark, J. S., Negueruela, I., Crowther, P . A., & Goodwin, S. P . 2005, A&A, 434, 949

    2005

  2. [10]

    S., Negueruela, I., & González-Fernández, C

    Clark, J. S., Negueruela, I., & González-Fernández, C. 2014 , A&A, 561, A15

    2014

  3. [11]

    S., Ritchie, B

    Clark, J. S., Ritchie, B. W., & Negueruela, I. 2020, A&A, 635, A187

    2020

  4. [12]

    2016, DOLPHOT: Stellar photometry, Astrophysi cs Source Code Library, record ascl:1608.013

    Dolphin, A. 2016, DOLPHOT: Stellar photometry, Astrophysi cs Source Code Library, record ascl:1608.013

    2016

  5. [13]

    Dolphin, A. E. 2000, PASP , 112, 1383

    2000

  6. [14]

    M., Clark, J

    Dougherty, S. M., Clark, J. S., Negueruela, I., Johnson, T., & Chapman, J. M. 2010, A&A, 511, A58

    2010

  7. [15]

    & De Marchi, G

    Fahrion, K. & De Marchi, G. 2023, A&A, 671, L14

    2023

  8. [16]

    & De Marchi, G

    Fahrion, K. & De Marchi, G. 2024, A&A, 681, A20

    2024

  9. [17]

    M., Clark, J

    Fenech, D. M., Clark, J. S., Prinja, R. K., et al. 2018, A&A, 61 7, A137

    2018

  10. [18]

    Fok, T. K. T., Nakashima, J.-i., Y ung, B. H. K., Hsia, C.-H., &Deguchi, S. 2012, ApJ, 760, 65 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2 016, A&A, 595, A1 Gaia Collaboration, V allenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 20 23, A&A, 674, A1

    2012

  11. [19]

    P ., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P ., Mather, J. C., Clampin, M., et al. 2006, Space Sci. Rev., 123, 485

    2006

  12. [20]

    2015, MNRAS, 448, 3248

    Geen, S., Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., Devriendt, J., & Slyz, A. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 3248

    2015

  13. [21]

    2011, MNRAS, 412, 2469

    Gennaro, M., Brandner, W., Stolte, A., & Henning, T. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 2469

    2011

  14. [22]

    G., Drake, J

    Guarcello, M. G., Drake, J. J., Wright, N. J., et al. 2023, ApJ S, 269, 9

    2023

  15. [23]

    G., Flaccomio, E., Albacete-Colombo, J

    Guarcello, M. G., Flaccomio, E., Albacete-Colombo, J. F., e t al. 2024, A&A, 682, A49

    2024

  16. [24]

    F., et al

    Gupta, A., Miotello, A., Manara, C. F., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, L8

    2023

  17. [25]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 108

    Habel, N., Nally, C., Lenki ´c, L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 108

    2024

  18. [26]

    C., Nally, C., Habel, N., et al

    Jones, O. C., Nally, C., Habel, N., et al. 2023, Nature Astron omy, 7, 694

    2023

  19. [27]

    2010, in Eighth Integral Workshop

    Kavanagh, P . 2010, in Eighth Integral Workshop. The Restless Gamma-ray Uni- verse (INTEGRAL 2010), 91

    2010

  20. [28]

    2012, Ap J, 750, L44 Kuffmeier, M., Jensen, S

    Kudryavtseva, N., Brandner, W., Gennaro, M., et al. 2012, Ap J, 750, L44 Kuffmeier, M., Jensen, S. S., & Haugbølle, T. 2023, European Phys ical Journal Plus, 138, 272

    2012

  21. [29]

    B., Scholz, A., Muži ´c, K., et al

    Langeveld, A. B., Scholz, A., Muži ´c, K., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 179

    2024

  22. [30]

    Larson, R. B. & Tinsley, B. M. 1978, ApJ, 219, 46

    1978

  23. [31]

    M., Hankins, M

    Lau, R. M., Hankins, M. J., Han, Y ., et al. 2022, Nature Astron omy, 6, 1308

    2022

  24. [32]

    M., Hankins, M

    Lau, R. M., Hankins, M. J., Sanchez-Bermudez, J., et al. 2024 , ApJ, 963, 127 Lenki´c, L., Nally, C., Jones, O. C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 110

    2024

  25. [33]

    L., Alves de Oliveira, C., Bara ffe, I., et al

    Luhman, K. L., Alves de Oliveira, C., Bara ffe, I., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 19

    2024

  26. [34]

    2015, A&A, 5 82, A24

    Mackey, J., Castro, N., Fossati, L., & Langer, N. 2015, A&A, 5 82, A24

    2015

  27. [35]

    V ., et al

    Mackey, J., Mohamed, S., Gvaramadze, V . V ., et al. 2014, Nature, 512, 282

    2014

  28. [36]

    F., Milone, A

    Marino, A. F., Milone, A. P ., Legnardi, M. V ., et al. 2024, ApJ, 965, 189 Martínez González, S. 2015, PhD thesis, National Institute of Astrophysics, Op- tics and Electronics, Mexico

    2024

  29. [37]

    1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Co nference Se- ries, V ol

    Montmerle, T. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Co nference Se- ries, V ol. 109, Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, ed. R. Pallavicini & A. K. Dupree, 405– +

    1996

  30. [38]

    P ., Clark, J

    Muno, M. P ., Clark, J. S., Crowther, P . A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 636, L41

    2006

  31. [39]

    C., Lenki ´c, L., et al

    Nally, C., Jones, O. C., Lenki ´c, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 183

    2024

  32. [40]

    E., Rocha, D

    Navarete, F., Damineli, A., Ramirez, A. E., Rocha, D. F., & Almeida, L. A. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 1289

    2022

  33. [41]

    S., Kavanagh, P

    Nayak, O., Hirschauer, A. S., Kavanagh, P . J., et al. 2024, Ap J, 963, 94

    2024

  34. [42]

    J., Dorda, R., et al

    Negueruela, I., Alfaro, E. J., Dorda, R., et al. 2022, A&A, 66 4, A146

    2022

  35. [43]

    S., & Ritchie, B

    Negueruela, I., Clark, J. S., & Ritchie, B. W. 2010, A&A, 516, A78

    2010

  36. [44]

    Pearson, S. G. & McCaughrean, M. J. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arX iv:2310.01231

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P ., et al

    Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P ., et al. 2 014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Confer ence Series, V ol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Mil- limeter Wave, ed. J. Oschmann, Jacobus M., M. ...

    2014

  38. [46]

    D., Soummer, R., Elliott, E

    Perrin, M. D., Soummer, R., Elliott, E. M., Lallo, M. D., & Siv aramakrishnan, A. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engin eers (SPIE) Con- ference Series, V ol. 8442, Space Telescopes and Instrument ation 2012: Op- tical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. M. C...

    2012

  39. [47]

    R., Anderson, J., et al

    Piotto, G., Bedin, L. R., Anderson, J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 661, L53 Portegies Zwart, S. F., McMillan, S. L. W., & Gieles, M. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 431

    2007

  40. [48]

    H., Ressler, M

    Rieke, G. H., Ressler, M. E., Morrison, J. E., et al. 2015, PAS P , 127, 665

    2015

  41. [49]

    J., Kelly, D

    Rieke, M. J., Kelly, D. M., Misselt, K., et al. 2023, PASP , 135 , 028001

    2023

  42. [50]

    W., Clark, J

    Ritchie, B. W., Clark, J. S., Negueruela, I., & Crowther, P . A . 2009, A&A, 507, 1585 Rodríguez-González, A., Cantó, J., Esquivel, A., Raga, A. C ., & V elázquez, P . F. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 1198

    2009

  43. [51]

    & Pittard, J

    Rogers, H. & Pittard, J. M. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1337

    2013

  44. [52]

    M., Jones, T

    Shenoy, D., Humphreys, R. M., Jones, T. J., et al. 2016, AJ, 15 1, 51

    2016

  45. [53]

    Smith, B. J. & Struck, C. 2010, AJ, 140, 1975

    2010

  46. [54]

    Smith, D. J. B., Dunne, L., Maddox, S. J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 4 16, 857

    2011

  47. [55]

    Stetson, P . B. 1987, PASP , 99, 191 Warfield, J. T., Richstein, H., Kallivayalil, N., et al. 2023 , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 7, 23

    1987

  48. [56]

    R., Dolphin, A

    Weisz, D. R., Dolphin, A. E., Savino, A., et al. 2024, ApJS, 27 1, 47

    2024

  49. [57]

    Winter, A. J. & Clarke, C. J. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 1646

    2023

  50. [58]

    J., Wesson, R., Drew, J

    Wright, N. J., Wesson, R., Drew, J. E., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 437 , L1

    2014

  51. [59]

    orcid-ID.png

    Zavala, S., Toalá, J. A., Santamaría, E., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3317 Article number, page 13 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. sample631 Appendix A: NIRCam and MIRI observations log Table A.1 shows the log of the NIRCam and MIRI observations of Westerlund 1 Article number, p...

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.