Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 40 references

All-optical convolution utilizing processing in memory based on a cold atomic ensemble

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper demonstrates all-optical convolution inside a cold-atomic-ensemble memory, with spiral-phase edge enhancement stored and read out on demand after more than 320 microseconds.

desk verdict A plausible cold-atom EIT memory that does SPC edge enhancement at the Fourier plane, but the posted manuscript hides the derivation and simulation parameters in a missing supplement. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14716 v1 pith:XM7YX2HZ submitted 2025-06-17 physics.app-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

Ying-Hao Ye , Jia-Qi Jiang , En-Ze Li , Wei Zhang , Da-Chuang Li , Zhi-Han Zhu , Dong-Sheng Ding , Bao-Sen Shi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phphysics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords processinginmemoryall-opticalconvolutioncoldatomicensembleelectromagneticallyinducedtransparencyspiralphasecontrastedgeenhancementopticalimagestoragetransversespatialmodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a cold rubidium atomic ensemble can serve as computational storage: instead of merely preserving an image, it performs an all-optical convolution on that image during storage and releases the processed result later. The convolution is spiral phase contrast (SPC), a phase-only edge-enhancement filter, implemented by imprinting vortex phases carried by the control light onto the atomic spin wave through electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT). Experimental images of the letter 'Ψ' match simulations at storage times beyond 300 µs, and the authors claim on-demand readout of processed images for over 320 µs, the longest duration reported for an atomic-based memory to date. If the claim is right, placing the atomic ensemble at the Fourier plane of a 4f system merges computation and memory into a single all-optical device, a step toward optical processing-in-memory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dark-state polariton (DSP), the quasiparticle formed by a resonant two-photon Raman process that adiabatically converts a combined signal-control field into a purely atomic collective excitation and back. Its transverse profile carries the spatial information: because the control field is a hypergeometric-Gaussian vortex $g(r)e^{-il\phi}$ rather than a plane wave, the DSP stores not the image itself but the image's Fourier spectrum multiplied by the vortex phase. The second lens of the 4f imaging system performs the inverse Fourier transform, which turns that product into the convolution of the original image with a vortex-shaped point-spread function. The experiment's conceptual move is to place the filter inside the memory, so that computation, storage, and readout happen in one coherent optical path.

What would settle it

Place a pinhole or a small object at the mask plane and directly measure the retrieved point-spread function at several lateral positions: if it is not the predicted $\mathcal{F}^{-1}\{g^2(r)e^{i\Delta l \phi}\}$ — for instance, if the vortex center shifts, the doughnut size changes with input position, or the pattern depends on axial placement of the cloud — then the two-dimensional Fourier-plane filter model is wrong and the agreement with simulation would not generalize.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the EIT storage-and-retrieval sequence in a cold atomic ensemble realizes a programmable phase-only convolution directly in memory. During write-in, the stored spin wave acquires the product $E_S^{\mathrm{in}}(\mathbf{r})\,U_l^W(\mathbf{r})$ of the signal's Fourier spectrum and the control field's hypergeometric-Gaussian profile $U_l^W(\mathbf{r})=g(r)e^{-il\phi}$; during read-out, a second control field imprints the conjugate vortex, so the retrieved field is proportional to $E * \mathcal{F}^{-1}\{g^2(r)e^{i\Delta l \phi}\}$, with $\Delta l=|l-l'|$. The authors verify this convolution theorem experimentally for the edge-enhancement case $\Delta l=1$, for higher-order SPC with $\Delta l=2,3$, and for the reversal case $l=l'$ where the second vortex cancels the first. They also show that the processed image remains visible for storage times beyond 300 µs, and on-demand retrieval survives beyond 320 µs, which they attribute to mapping the memory onto magnetically insensitive hyperfine states in a guiding magnetic field.

Load-bearing premise

The experiment assumes the cold atomic cloud acts as a perfect thin two-dimensional screen at the Fourier plane, so that the stored spin wave is exactly the product of the image spectrum and the vortex phase; if finite cloud size, diffraction, or phase curvature materially corrupts that multiplication, the claimed convolution kernel is not realized.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Optical processing-in-memory becomes feasible in practice: the same atomic ensemble stores an image, transforms it, and releases it, bypassing the data movement between memory and processor that dominates latency and energy in conventional architectures.
  • Edge-enhanced images can be held for more than 320 µs and read out on demand, a timescale corresponding to roughly 60 km of optical-fiber delay and long enough for many network-level synchronization and time-multiplexing tasks.
  • The read-out control field acts as a second programmable filter: applying the same vortex during write-in and read-out cancels the first convolution, while using different charges produces higher-order spiral phase contrast ($\Delta l=2,3$), showing that the operation is reversible and tunable.
  • Because SPC is a phase-only filter, the technique preserves photon throughput; even at $|l|=3$, retrieval efficiency remains above $1/e$ of the case without SPC, so the processing does not destroy the stored signal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper itself limits the model to a 2D Fourier plane (Sec. II), noting that the atomic medium is about 2 mm in diameter versus a Rayleigh length of about 100 mm; this is the main assumption that would need revisiting for larger images, thicker clouds, or higher vortex charges.
  • The manuscript contains unresolved citation placeholders ([XXX]) at the Fourier-plane assumption and at the simulation comparison, so the numerical support for those steps is not yet fully documented in the text.
  • The same phase-transfer mechanism should work for any programmable phase mask on the control beam, not only vortices, which would turn the atomic memory into a reconfigurable all-optical convolution engine for arbitrary kernels.
  • Since the retrieval is already recorded with time-correlated single-photon imaging and cold-ensemble memories have stored single photons, a quantum version of processing-in-memory — storing and convolving nonclassical images — is a natural next step if the phase-imprinting step does not add significant noise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experiment on all-optical convolution performed during electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) based storage and retrieval in a cold 85Rb ensemble. The authors place the atomic ensemble at the Fourier plane of a 4f optical system, imprint spiral phases from control fields onto spin waves during both write-in and read-out stages, and demonstrate spiral phase contrast (SPC) edge enhancement of retrieved images. They claim on-demand readout of processed images for over 320 microseconds, stated to be the longest duration reported for an atomic-based memory to date. The experimental images show SPC edge enhancement and a cancellation effect when identical vortices are used in the two stages, qualitatively consistent with simulations; however, the theoretical derivation behind Eq. (1) and the simulation parameters are deferred to a supplementary file and to placeholder references, so the quantitative support for the central claim is currently incomplete.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper demonstrates a useful integration of storage and computation in a single atomic medium, an appealing realization of optical processing-in-memory. The observed edge enhancement, the nullification of the write-in convolution by an identical read-out vortex, and the high-order SPC results are concrete experimental advances, and the 320-microsecond memory lifetime is notable. The reliance on magnetically insensitive states and a guiding field builds on the group's prior work and is credible. However, the central ideal thin-lens Fourier-plane assumption is not yet rigorously established, and the missing simulation parameters and supplementary derivation prevent the reader from verifying the key quantitative claims. The significance is therefore conditional on completing the theoretical and simulation support.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II, paragraph beginning 'Given that the spatial dimensions...'] The justification for treating the cold atomic ensemble as an ideal thin 2D Fourier-plane filter compares a transverse dimension (~2 mm diameter) with the longitudinal Rayleigh length (~100 mm), but the relevant condition is that the longitudinal thickness L of the atomic cloud be much smaller than the Rayleigh range. The manuscript does not report L or show that the transverse profiles of signal and control are z-independent over the cloud; if L is not negligible, the recorded spin wave is a z-averaged product that includes Gouy-phase variations, and the kernel g^2(r) exp(iΔlϕ) in Eq. (1) is not realized exactly. The authors should provide a quantitative criterion with a measured L, or perform a 3D propagation simulation to show that the 2D Fourier-plane model is adequate.
  2. [Section II, chirality statement and Eq. (1)] The statement that the read-out control pulse imprints a spiral phase 'with chirality opposite to that observed during the write-in stage [XXX]' is load-bearing: it determines whether the read-out convolution cancels or adds to the write-in phase and directly defines Δl = |l - l'| in Eq. (1). The manuscript supports this statement only with a placeholder reference rather than a derivation or an explicit experimental calibration. A rigorous derivation of the sign relationship, or at minimum a clearly described measurement that fixes the relative chirality, is required for the central claim to be verifiable.
  3. [Section III, Figs. 2 and 3] The claim that the measured images 'align well with the theoretical simulations' cannot be assessed because the simulations are said to be 'based on our experimental parameters [XXX]' and no parameters are given in the manuscript. The authors should provide the complete parameter list used in the numerical analysis, as well as a defined quantitative metric for image agreement (e.g., normalized cross-correlation or a visibility comparison with error bars), so that the match between experiment and simulation can be independently evaluated.
  4. [Section II, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) mixes the notation E(-r), E, and a convolution with F^{-1}(g^2(r) exp(iΔlϕ)) without defining the field arguments, the convolution variables, or the Fourier-transform convention. As written, it is not a self-contained statement of the convolution theorem for the 4f system. Please rewrite the equation with explicit definitions of all fields, coordinates, and transform conventions, and derive it from the spin-wave recording and the read-out phase-imprinting process.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section V heading] The heading 'ACKONWLEDGEMENTS' is misspelled and should be 'ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS'.
  2. [Section II, experimental setup paragraph] The sentence 'The signal and control light are combined using a PBS and and interact collinearly' contains a duplicated 'and'.
  3. [Sections II and III] Several '[XXX]' placeholders remain in the text, including the justification of the 2D Fourier-plane approximation, the chirality statement, and the simulation parameters; these must be replaced with actual citations and numerical values before the paper can be considered complete.
  4. [Figure 1] The figure caption appears garbled in places, including a label '1#4' and inconsistent units ('400µs' vs '400 μs'); the figures and captions should be carefully proofread.
  5. [Section III, image visibility definition] The definition 'V= (I max-I min)/(Imax +I min)' uses inconsistent subscript formatting; please define I_max and I_min consistently and specify how they are extracted from the images.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: Eq. (1) is a standard convolution-theorem statement applied to EIT storage; self-citations are minor and not load-bearing. The main caveats are missing references and parameters, plus the 2D Fourier-plane assumption, which are correctness/completeness concerns rather than circularity.

full rationale

The central relation, Eq. (1), is derived from the standard EIT dark-state-polariton description and the convolution theorem: the stored spin wave is taken proportional to E_S_in(r) U_W_l(r), the read-out control imprints the conjugate spiral phase, and the second lens performs an inverse Fourier transform. This is a textbook convolution-theorem structure, not a parameterization of the measured images; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The comparisons in Figs. 2 and 3 are said to use 'theoretical simulation based on our experimental parameters [XXX]' and experimental images, but the parameter list is missing, so the comparison cannot be audited; that is a completeness problem, not circularity. The paper also contains three unresolved [XXX] placeholders, including one after 'chirality opposite to that observed during the write-in stage' and one after the 2D Fourier-plane simplification, and it refers to 'the supplementary material for a theoretical framework' without providing the framework in the posted text; these are missing-support flags, not circular steps. The only self-citations of note are [24] (magnetically insensitive states and guiding field for long storage) and related group-authored references; these supply experimental techniques and mode definitions, but the 320 us lifetime is measured in the present experiment, and the convolution claim does not reduce to accepting [24] as definitionally true. No uniqueness theorem is invoked, and no prior work by the authors is used to forbid alternatives. The paper does contain a load-bearing assumption that the cold ensemble acts as a thin 2D Fourier-plane filter, justified only by the sentence 'Given that the spatial dimensions of the atomic medium (~2 mm in diameter) are significantly smaller than the Rayleigh length of the signal field (~100 mm), we limit the numerical analysis to the 2D Fourier plane for simplicity [XXX].' As the skeptic notes, a transverse diameter does not bound the longitudinal thickness that must be small for the 2D Fourier-plane model. But this is an assumption about the validity of the model, not a circular step that equates output with input. No specific circular reduction can be exhibited; score 2 reflects the presence of minor self-citations that are not load-bearing, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation relies on standard Fourier optics and DSP theory, plus a 2D Fourier-plane idealization of the atomic medium and an unproven, in the missing supplement, opposite-chirality read-out phase transfer. No free parameters are explicitly fitted to data, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Dark-state polariton (DSP) theory governs lossless, reversible storage and retrieval of the transverse spatial profile of the signal field in the EIT Lambda system.
    Invoked in Section II as the basis for writing the collective excitation profile proportional to E_S_in(r) times U_W_l(r). Cites Fleischhauer-Lukin [18,19]; assumed valid for the multimode, on-resonance case.
  • standard math The atomic ensemble lies at the Fourier plane of a 4f system, so the stored field is the spatial Fourier transform of the input mask and the second lens performs the inverse transform.
    Eq. (1) and the convolution theorem require this. The paper places the MOT at the spectral plane of the 4f imaging system (Fig. 1).
  • domain assumption The atomic medium can be treated as a thin 2D Fourier-plane screen, ignoring finite aperture, Gouy phase, and longitudinal propagation effects.
    Section II: the atomic medium is about 2 mm in diameter while the Rayleigh length is about 100 mm, so the analysis is limited to the 2D Fourier plane, marked with an unresolved [XXX] placeholder. This assumption is load-bearing for the simple convolution kernel in Eq. (1).
  • ad hoc to paper During read-out the control vortex imprints a spiral phase of opposite chirality to that of the write-in stage, enabling cancelation or higher-order SPC as in Eq. (1).
    Section II asserts this opposite-chirality transfer and marks it with an unresolved placeholder [XXX]; the derivation is deferred to the supplementary material, which is not included in arXiv v1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of All-optical convolution utilizing processing in memory based on a cold atomic ensemble." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XM7YX2HZ

@misc{pith2026250614716,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: All-optical convolution utilizing processing in memory based on a cold atomic ensemble},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XM7YX2HZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14716}
}
read the original abstract

Processing in memory (PIM) has received significant attention due to its high efficiency, low latency, and parallelism. In optical computation, coherent memory is a crucial infrastructure for PIM frameworks. This study presents an all-optical convolution experiment conducted within computational storage based on a cold atomic ensemble. By exploiting the light-atom phase transfer facilitated by the electromagnetically induced transparency, we demonstrated spiral phase contrast processing of photon images in memory, resulting in the edge enhancement of retrieved images recorded using time-correlated photon imaging. In particular, adopting state-of-the-art atomic techniques provides a coherent memory lifetime exceeding 320 us for PIM operations. Our results highlight the significant potential of cold atomic ensembles as computational storage for developing all-optical PIM systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14716 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental scheme. (a) Conceptual graph of all-optical convolution in computational storage. (b) Schematic representation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Experimental results of all-optical convolutions performed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Experimental results of secondary convolution during the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. D. Lukin, Colloquium: Trapping and manipulating photon states in atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 457 (2003)

    2003

  2. [2]

    H. J. Kimble, Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity qed, Phys. Scr.1998, 127 (1998)

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Zhao and J.-W

    B. Zhao and J.-W. Pan, Generation and storage of single pho- tons in collectively excited atomic ensembles, inSingle-Photon Generation and Detection, Experimental Methods in the Phys- ical Sciences, V ol. 45, edited by A. Migdall, S. V . Polyakov, J. Fan, and J. C. Bienfang (Academic Press, 2013) pp. 541–562

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Sangouard, C

    N. Sangouard, C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear op- tics, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 33 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Chaneli `ere, G

    T. Chaneli `ere, G. H´etet, and N. Sangouard, Chapter two - quan- tum optical memory protocols in atomic ensembles (Academic Press, 2018) pp. 77–150

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Optical quantum memory, Nat. Photon.3, 706 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    R. Zhao, Y . Dudin, S. Jenkins, C. Campbell, D. Matsukevich, T. Kennedy, and A. Kuzmich, Long-lived quantum memory, Nat. Phys.5, 100 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    D. N. Matsukevich, T. Chaneli `ere, S. D. Jenkins, S.-Y . Lan, T. A. B. Kennedy, and A. Kuzmich, Observation of dark state polariton collapses and revivals, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 033601 (2006)

    work page 2006

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    S. D. Jenkins, D. N. Matsukevich, T. Chaneli `ere, A. Kuzmich, and T. A. B. Kennedy, Theory of dark-state polariton collapses and revivals, Phys. Rev. A73, 021803 (2006)

    2006

  2. [10]

    Vernaz-Gris, K

    P. Vernaz-Gris, K. Huang, M. Cao, A. S. Sheremet, and J. Lau- rat, Highly-efficient quantum memory for polarization qubits in a spatially-multiplexed cold atomic ensemble, Nat. Commun. 9, 363 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Wang, M.-j

    S.-z. Wang, M.-j. Wang, Y .-f. Wen, Z.-x. Xu, T.-f. Ma, S.-j. Li, and H. Wang, Long-lived and multiplexed atom-photon entan- glement interface with feed-forward-controlled readouts, Com- mun. Phys.4, 168 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Heller, P

    L. Heller, P. Farrera, G. Heinze, and H. de Riedmatten, Cold- atom temporally multiplexed quantum memory with cavity- enhanced noise suppression, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 210504 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Wang, J.-Y

    J. Wang, J.-Y . Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y . Yan, H. Huang, Y . Ren, Y . Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur,et al., Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multi- plexing, Nat. Photon.6, 488 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    or phase patterns of photons and have even extended into the realm of single-photon storage [15, 16]. ∗ zhuzhihan@hrbust.edu.cn † dds@ustc.edu.cn ‡ drshi@ustc.edu.cn A widely used protocol for memorizing transverse multi- mode data employs the optical modulation technique know...

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Shuker, O

    M. Shuker, O. Firstenberg, R. Pugatch, A. Ron, and N. David- son, Storing images in warm atomic vapor, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 223601 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Nicolas, L

    A. Nicolas, L. Veissier, L. Giner, E. Giacobino, D. Maxein, and J. Laurat, A quantum memory for orbital angular momentum photonic qubits, Nat. Photon.8, 234 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Ding, Z.-Y

    D.-S. Ding, Z.-Y . Zhou, B.-S. Shi, and G.-C. Guo, Single- photon-level quantum image memory based on cold atomic en- sembles, Nat. Commun.4, 2527 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Electro- magnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 633 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Fleischhauer and M

    M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin, Dark-state polaritons in elec- tromagnetically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 5094 (2000)

    2000

  12. [20]

    Fleischhauer and M

    M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin, Quantum memory for pho- tons: Dark-state polaritons, Phys. Rev. A65, 022314 (2002)

    2002

  13. [21]

    X. Zou, S. Xu, X. Chen, L. Yan, and Y . Han, Breaking the von neumann bottleneck: architecture-level processing-in-memory technology, Sci China Inf Sci64, 160404 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    E. A. Vashukevich, T. Y . Golubeva, and Y . M. Golubev, Conver- sion and storage of modes with orbital angular momentum in a quantum memory scheme, Phys. Rev. A101, 033830 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    F ¨urhapter, A

    S. F ¨urhapter, A. Jesacher, S. Bernet, and M. Ritsch-Marte, Spi- ral phase contrast imaging in microscopy, Opt. Express13, 689 (2005)

    2005

  16. [24]

    J. A. Davis, D. E. McNamara, D. M. Cottrell, and J. Campos, Image processing with the radial hilbert transform: theory and experiments, Opt. Lett.25, 99 (2000)

    2000

  17. [25]

    Y .-H. Ye, L. Zeng, Y .-C. Yu, M.-X. Dong, E.-Z. Li, W.-H. Zhang, Z.-K. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Synchronized resistance of inhomogeneous magnet- ically induced dephasing of an image stored in a cold atomic ensemble, Phys. Review A103, 053316 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    M. R. Arnison, K. G. Larkin, C. J. R. Sheppard, N. I. Smith, and C. J. Cogswell, Linear phase imaging using differential in- terference contrast microscopy, J Microsc214, 7 (2004)

    2004

  19. [27]

    J. Zhou, S. Liu, H. Qian, Y . Li, H. Luo, S. Wen, Z. Zhou, G. Guo, B. Shi, and Z. Liu, Metasurface enabled quantum edge detection, Sci. Adv.6, eabc4385 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Karimi, G

    E. Karimi, G. Zito, B. Piccirillo, L. Marrucci, and E. Santamato, Hypergeometric-gaussian modes, Opt. Lett.32, 3053 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    X. Qiu, F. Li, W. Zhang, Z. Zhu, and L. Chen, Spiral phase contrast imaging in nonlinear optics: seeing phase objects using 6 invisible illumination, Optica5, 208 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Zhong, Z.-H

    R.-Y . Zhong, Z.-H. Zhu, H.-J. Wu, C. Rosales-Guzm ´an, S.-W. Song, and B.-S. Shi, Gouy-phase-mediated propagation varia- tions and revivals of transverse structure in vectorially struc- tured light, Phys. Rev. A103, 053520 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Chen, S.-H

    Y .-F. Chen, S.-H. Wang, C.-Y . Wang, and I. A. Yu, Manipulat- ing the retrieved width of stored light pulses, Phys. Rev. A72, 053803 (2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    D. A. Steck, Rubidium 85 d line data, (2001)

    2001

  25. [33]

    M. H. Anderson, W. Petrich, J. R. Ensher, and E. A. Cornell, Reduction of light-assisted collisional loss rate from a low- pressure vapor-cell trap, Phys. Rev. A50, R3597 (1994)

    1994

  26. [34]

    Ketterle, K

    W. Ketterle, K. B. Davis, M. A. Joffe, A. Martin, and D. E. Pritchard, High densities of cold atoms in a dark spontaneous- force optical trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2253 (1993)

    1993

  27. [35]

    Hsiao, H.-S

    Y .-F. Hsiao, H.-S. Chen, P.-J. Tsai, and Y .-C. Chen, Cold atomic media with ultrahigh optical depths, Phys. Rev. A90, 055401 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    P. J. Ungar, D. S. Weiss, E. Riis, and S. Chu, Optical mo- lasses and multilevel atoms: theory, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B6, 2058 (1989)

    1989

  29. [37]

    D. S. Weiss, E. Riis, Y . Shevy, P. J. Ungar, and S. Chu, Optical molasses and multilevel atoms: experiment, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 2072 (1989)

    1989

  30. [38]

    Vaity and L

    P. Vaity and L. Rusch, Perfect vortex beam: Fourier transfor- mation of a bessel beam, Opt. Lett.40, 597 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Jiang, H.-J

    J.-Q. Jiang, H.-J. Wu, B.-S. Yu, C.-Y . Li, X.-Y . Zhang, X.-P. Hu, B.-S. Shi, and Z.-H. Zhu, Nonlinear orbital angular momen- tum conversion with spatial-amplitude independence, J. Opt. 25, 024004 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Li, Light beams with flat-topped profiles, Opt

    Y . Li, Light beams with flat-topped profiles, Opt. Lett.27, 1007 (2002)

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.