pith. sign in

arxiv: 1208.1389 · v2 · pith:XMYZB64Inew · submitted 2012-08-07 · 🧮 math.GT · math.CO

On k-stellated and k-stacked spheres

classification 🧮 math.GT math.CO
keywords spheresstackedclasssigmastellatedcomplexessubseteqthere
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We introduce the class $\Sigma_k(d)$ of $k$-stellated (combinatorial) spheres of dimension $d$ ($0 \leq k \leq d + 1$) and compare and contrast it with the class ${\cal S}_k(d)$ ($0 \leq k \leq d$) of $k$-stacked homology $d$-spheres. We have $\Sigma_1(d) = {\cal S}_1(d)$, and $\Sigma_k(d) \subseteq {\cal S}_k(d)$ for $d \geq 2k - 1$. However, for each $k \geq 2$ there are $k$-stacked spheres which are not $k$-stellated. The existence of $k$-stellated spheres which are not $k$-stacked remains an open question. We also consider the class ${\cal W}_k(d)$ (and ${\cal K}_k(d)$) of simplicial complexes all whose vertex-links belong to $\Sigma_k(d - 1)$ (respectively, ${\cal S}_k(d - 1)$). Thus, ${\cal W}_k(d) \subseteq {\cal K}_k(d)$ for $d \geq 2k$, while ${\cal W}_1(d) = {\cal K}_1(d)$. Let $\bar{{\cal K}}_k(d)$ denote the class of $d$-dimensional complexes all whose vertex-links are $k$-stacked balls. We show that for $d\geq 2k + 2$, there is a natural bijection $M \mapsto \bar{M}$ from ${\cal K}_k(d)$ onto $\bar{{\cal K}}_k(d + 1)$ which is the inverse to the boundary map $\partial \colon \bar{{\cal K}}_k(d + 1) \to {\cal K}_k(d)$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.