pith. sign in

arxiv: 1507.03137 · v2 · pith:XNRT5VCYnew · submitted 2015-07-11 · 💻 cs.PL

Pushdown Control-Flow Analysis for Free

classification 💻 cs.PL
keywords analysiscfa2pdcfacomputationallycontrol-flowdistinctimplementonly
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Traditional control-flow analysis (CFA) for higher-order languages, whether implemented by constraint-solving or abstract interpretation, introduces spurious connections between callers and callees. Two distinct invocations of a function will necessarily pollute one another's return-flow. Recently, three distinct approaches have been published which provide perfect call-stack precision in a computable manner: CFA2, PDCFA, and AAC. Unfortunately, CFA2 and PDCFA are difficult to implement and require significant engineering effort. Furthermore, all three are computationally expensive; for a monovariant analysis, CFA2 is in $O(2^n)$, PDCFA is in $O(n^6)$, and AAC is in $O(n^9 log n)$. In this paper, we describe a new technique that builds on these but is both straightforward to implement and computationally inexpensive. The crucial insight is an unusual state-dependent allocation strategy for the addresses of continuation. Our technique imposes only a constant-factor overhead on the underlying analysis and, with monovariance, costs only O(n3) in the worst case. This paper presents the intuitions behind this development, a proof of the precision of this analysis, and benchmarks demonstrating its efficacy.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.