Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

IntenT5: Search Result Diversification using Causal Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.04026 v1 pith:XOOIOQNX submitted 2021-08-09 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords queryqueriescausaldatadiversitylanguagemodelsresult
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Search result diversification is a beneficial approach to overcome under-specified queries, such as those that are ambiguous or multi-faceted. Existing approaches often rely on massive query logs and interaction data to generate a variety of possible query intents, which then can be used to re-rank documents. However, relying on user interaction data is problematic because one first needs a massive user base to build a sufficient log; public query logs are insufficient on their own. Given the recent success of causal language models (such as the Text-To-Text Transformer (T5) model) at text generation tasks, we explore the capacity of these models to generate potential query intents. We find that to encourage diversity in the generated queries, it is beneficial to adapt the model by including a new Distributional Causal Language Modeling (DCLM) objective during fine-tuning and a representation replacement during inference. Across six standard evaluation benchmarks, we find that our method (which we call IntenT5) improves search result diversity and attains (and sometimes exceeds) the diversity obtained when using query suggestions based on a proprietary query log. Our analysis shows that our approach is most effective for multi-faceted queries and is able to generalize effectively to queries that were unseen in training data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modeling Ranking Properties with In-Context Learning

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In-context examples that encode a target distribution over document attributes can steer LLM rerankers toward fairness and diversity while roughly preserving relevance on four IR benchmarks.

  2. Generating Search Explanations using Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned LLMs generate Wikipedia-section-style search explanations that score higher on automatic overlap metrics than earlier trained-from-scratch transformer baselines.

Pith tools