Nonlinear Hodge correspondence for morphisms

Mao Sheng; Nianzi Li

Nonlinear Hodge correspondence for morphisms

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes a nonlinear analogue of the Higgs–flat correspondence, in which the only obstruction to a flat section being Higgs is a degree term.

desk verdict Nonlinear Simpson correspondence upgraded from vector bundles to sections, sub-fibrations, and morphisms; the central claims are honest and conditionally stated, with the Hamiltonian hypothesis as the main load-bearing premise. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13450 v1 pith:XTKDCZ2E submitted 2026-07-15 math.DG math.AG

Nianzi Li , Mao Sheng This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGmath.AG MSC 53C0753C5532L0532Q1558E20

keywords nonabelianHodgetheoryBochner–Kodaira–NakanoidentitiesflatsectionsHiggsnonlinearharmonicbundlesdegreeobstructionHamiltonianvectorfieldsmorphisms

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a nonlinear analogue of the classical Higgs–flat correspondence: for a nonlinear harmonic bundle — a fiber bundle carrying a flat connection and a Higgs structure that are compatible — a section is flat if and only if it is a Higgs section and a certain degree vanishes. The authors then lift this from sections to sub-fibrations (immersed families of submanifolds in the fibers) and to morphisms between two nonlinear harmonic bundles, by identifying a morphism with its graph inside the fiber product. The result would matter because it turns the difference between the flat and Higgs worlds for nonlinear bundles into a single, computable numerical obstruction, and it recovers the vector-bundle statement as the case where that obstruction is automatically zero.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano type identities (Theorems 3.17 and 3.22) for sections. They express the energy difference between D′u and D′′u in terms of Λ_ωS(u*ωX−ζ) plus curvature and comoment terms, and the difference between D^c u and Du in terms of the exact form d(u*α) plus pseudo-curvature. Integrating these identities over a compact semi-Kähler base converts the left-hand side into the condition deg_ωX(u)=0. The Hamiltonian comoment map is what turns bracket identities in the fiber automorphism algebra into Hamiltonian-potential terms, which is why the non-Hamiltonian counterexample breaks flat-to-Higgs. The same identities are pulled back along the fiber produ

What would settle it

A concrete observation: over an elliptic curve, take the trivial torus bundle with the translation field ∂_z, which is not Hamiltonian, and the section u(s)=s̄−s. This section is flat, has vanishing degree, and is not Higgs, so it isolates Assumption 3.7(1) as essential. To test the boundary of the theorem, seek any compact semi-Kähler base and nonlinear harmonic bundle where k_s contains a non-Hamiltonian Killing field and check for a flat degree-zero section that is not Higgs; finding one would show the Hamiltonian hypothesis cannot be weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is Corollary 3.24 together with Theorems 4.25 and 5.10. In a nonlinear harmonic bundle over a compact semi-Kähler manifold, assuming the fiber automorphism algebra is Hamiltonian, the relevant connection preserves it, the relative Kähler form is closed, and the twisting 2-form ζ is zero, a smooth section u is flat if and only if it is a Higgs section with deg_ωX(u)=0. For sub-fibrations (Σ,u), the same equivalence holds with a combined degree that includes tangent-component corrections; for morphisms F:X1→X2, flatness with Φ(F)=0 is equivalent to being a Higgs morphism with deg(F)=0. This generalizes the classical linear statement, where every section

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, for every base point, each holomorphic vector field in the fiber's infinitesimal automorphism algebra is Hamiltonian for the fiber Kähler form; when this fails, the paper's own example produces a flat section that is not Higgs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In every nonlinear harmonic bundle satisfying the assumptions, a flat section has deg_ωX(u)=0, and a Higgs section is flat exactly when this holds; topology alone constrains which Higgs sections can be flat.
For sub-fibrations, the combined degree provides an explicit obstruction: a Higgs sub-fibration is flat if and only if its combined degree vanishes, with tangent and Higgs-correction terms canceling in examples such as families of conics.
For morphisms between two such bundles, the correspondence states that flat morphisms with Φ(F)=0 are precisely the Higgs morphisms with deg(F)=0, giving a nonlinear analogue of the Hom-bundle morphism correspondence.
Associated morphisms induced by equivariant holomorphic maps between fibers are automatically both Higgs and flat, so many classical geometric maps (e.g., symmetric powers of a vector bundle) fit into the correspondence.
The linear vector-bundle case follows as a limit: because every section is homotopic to the zero section, the degree obstruction vanishes and 'flat iff Higgs' is recovered.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper treats the degree term as the nonlinear replacement for vanishing Chern classes; a natural program would be to package degree-zero Higgs morphisms into a category whose objects are nonlinear harmonic bundles, making the correspondence functorial at the level of morphisms.
The open question of whether Φ(F)=0 is automatic for flat morphisms suggests a test: compute Φ for the flat non-Higgs morphism in the paper's noncompact example; if a compact example with Φ(F)≠0 exists, the flat-to-Higgs direction would need refinement.
The identity-based proof indicates the same degree obstruction should appear for other geometric PDEs involving sections of fiber bundles, not just the specific Higgs/flat equations; one could test the analogue for harmonic maps or pluriharmonic sections.
The Hamiltonian hypothesis may be replaceable by a weaker 'integrable Hamiltonian' condition in specific bundle classes; the torus-fibration counterexample marks the boundary of any such relaxation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does what its title says: it moves the flat/Higgs correspondence from vector bundles to nonlinear fiber bundles, with a degree obstruction, then to sub-fibrations and to morphisms via graphs. The new material is real. The Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano identities in Theorems 3.17 and 3.22 are the engine, and the corollary that a flat section is exactly a Higgs section with vanishing degree is a clean upgrade of Simpson's linear statement. I especially liked that Section 3.4 actually verifies the linear case against Simpson instead of just claiming compatibility, and that Examples 3.20 and 3.23 demonstrate that the degree condition and the Hamiltonian condition each bite. That is the right way to present a conditional theorem.

Soft spots, in proportion. The framework leans heavily on the authors' own [LS26], which I have not read in full, so part of my confidence transfers to an unverified companion paper. The proofs are long tensor computations that I could not machine-check; that is a real limit on how certain I can be. The stress-test note correctly identifies Assumption 3.7(1) as the most load-bearing hypothesis. It is needed for the flat-implies-Higgs direction, it is not automatic (properness gives parts (2) and (3) but not (1)), and Example 3.23 shows the statement really fails without it. I do not count this as a flaw because the authors state it plainly and do not overclaim. It does mean the correspondence is conditional rather than universal, and readers should not come away thinking nonlinear Hodge correspondence always works. One smaller gap: Remark 5.14 leaves open whether flat morphisms with nonzero Phi exist under the stated hypotheses, so half of the morphism correspondence could in the end be vacuous. They flag it clearly, so that is honest, but it is worth knowing before you build on that theorem.

Who should read this: anyone working in nonabelian Hodge theory, harmonic bundles, or Higgs bundles on complex manifolds. It deserves a serious referee; I would not desk-reject it, and I would take the referee report as the main check on the tensor computations. If the referee can verify the key identities, this is a solid contribution to the program.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a nonlinear analogue of the classical Higgs–flat section correspondence of Simpson for harmonic vector bundles. For a nonlinear harmonic bundle, the authors derive two Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano type identities (Theorems 3.17 and 3.22). These yield a correspondence: under Assumption 3.7 and with ζ = 0, a smooth section is flat if and only if it is a Higgs section and the geometric degree deg_{ω_X}(u) vanishes (Corollary 3.24). The correspondence is then extended to sub-fibrations (Theorems 4.25 and 4.29) and, via the graph construction in X_1 ×_S X_2, to morphisms between nonlinear harmonic bundles (Theorem 5.10, Theorem 1.10). Examples show that the degree obstruction is nontrivial and that the Hamiltonian hypothesis in Assumption 3.7(1) is necessary.

Significance. If correct, this gives a substantial nonlinear generalization of the classical Simpson correspondence at the level of sections and morphisms, with a clean geometric obstruction given by a degree term. The paper is unusually honest about its hypotheses: Example 3.20 shows that the degree condition is genuinely needed, and Example 3.23 shows that the Hamiltonian assumption cannot be omitted. The main results are fully conditional, but the conditions are stated precisely and the proofs are long rather than circular; the obstruction deg_{ω_X}(u) is a geometric integral, not a fitted parameter. The paper also provides a careful reduction from nonlinear harmonic bundles to vector bundles in the projectivized setting. The tensor computations are extensive; I did not find a concrete error, though I could not machine-check all of them.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract and §1] The abstract states that the equivalence 'requires the vanishing of a degree obstruction'. This is true only under Assumption 3.7(1)–(4) and ζ = 0. In particular, Example 3.23 shows that the Hamiltonian hypothesis in Assumption 3.7(1) is essential for the flat ⇒ Higgs direction. The introduction and abstract should explicitly qualify the correspondence as conditional on these assumptions, especially because the title may be read as asserting an unconditional result.
[Theorem 1.5] In the displayed formula for |D'u|^2 − |D''u|^2, the bracket in the term Λ_{ω_S}(u^*ω_X + u^*μ^*[... ]_R) is missing; compare with Eq. (3.35) in Theorem 3.17, where the expression is written correctly. This is a typographical issue but worth correcting.
[§2] The paper relies heavily on [LS26] for foundational definitions (Kähler connection, lifting condition, pseudo-curvature, adaptedness, etc.). A short glossary or a table of the imported notation would improve accessibility. The current version is difficult to read without [LS26] at hand.
[Definition 4.22] The combined degree deg(Σ,u) is defined with several correction terms. It may help to state explicitly in the text before the definition that deg_{F,∂}(Σ,u) and deg_{F,∂bar}(Σ,u) are nonnegative when u is pseudo-holomorphic and that the θ-correction term is the only term that can have either sign. This is implicit in the proof of Theorem 4.25 but would aid the reader.
[§5.4] In Theorem 5.10(i), the assumption ζ_1 = ζ_2 = 0 appears; Remark 5.11 notes a version without this condition. It would be helpful to state in the theorem itself, or immediately after, how the statement changes when ζ_i are nonzero and which parts of Assumption 3.7 are actually used. This is already done in Remark 5.11, but a pointer in the main statement would prevent confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the flat/Higgs correspondence is derived from proven Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano identities, the degree obstruction is a geometric integral rather than a fitted value, and self-citations to [LS26] supply foundational setup, not the target result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a derivation, not a repackaging. Theorem 3.17 is proven from the pointwise identity (3.4), the adaptation identity (3.13), the comoment-map formula (3.21), and the minimal-coupling decomposition (3.24); Theorem 3.22 is proven from Proposition 3.1 applied to the modified connections and the explicit computation (3.41). These are genuine Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano identities with no fitted parameters. The obstruction deg_{ωX,ζ}(u) is an integral of u*ω_X − ζ; Lemma 3.19 shows the integrand is independent of the choice of ω_X, so the degree is a well-defined geometric quantity, not a disguised fit. The flat-implies-Higgs direction is nontrivial: it requires the Hamiltonian hypothesis Assumption 3.7(1), and the authors explicitly exhibit in Example 3.23 a flat non-Higgs section when that assumption fails. This is a stated, load-bearing hypothesis and a limitation, but not circularity: the conclusion is conditional on it, not equivalent to it. The later sub-fibration and morphism results reduce to the section case by pulling back along π, and the graph construction identifies morphisms with sub-fibrations; these are reductions of the problem, not redefinitions of the conclusion. The self-citations to [LS26] are used for the prior half-correspondence and for background definitions; the new content of this paper—the degree obstruction and the D^c–D identity—is not imported from that citation. Remark 5.14 also honestly flags an open problem about whether all flat morphisms are Higgs under the stated hypotheses. No circular step satisfying the exhibited-equivalence standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Everything the central claim rests on beyond standard differential geometry: the four Assumptions 3.7(i), the ζ=0 minimal-coupling normalization, and the [LS26] framework defining nonlinear flat/Higgs/harmonic bundles. Assumption 3.7(1) is load-bearing and the paper proves it cannot be omitted (Example 3.23); the remaining items are automatic in the proper case (Remark 3.8) or fixable via the ζ-replacement (Remark 3.18). No numerical constants are fitted to data (the Hermitian metrics ω_S, ω_Σ are fixed inputs of the statements, and Lemma 3.19 shows the degree quantity is choice-independent up to ζ), and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (8)

domain assumption Assumption 3.7(1): for each s∈S, every element of k_s ⊂ aut(X_s, ω_s) is Hamiltonian (k_s ⊂ Ham^{1,0}(X_s)).
Used in Corollary 3.9 and Theorem 3.22 to convert bracket terms into comoment values; Example 3.23 shows the flat⇒Higgs direction fails when it is dropped. Necessity is demonstrated by the authors.
domain assumption Assumption 3.7(2): existence of a smooth fiberwise equivariant comoment map μ* with d_{X_s} μ*(ξ) = −ι_ξ ω_s.
Enters the pointwise identity (3.21) and the minimal-coupling formula (3.24). Automatic for proper f by mean-zero Hamiltonian potentials (Remark 3.8).
domain assumption Assumption 3.7(3): μ* is parallel w.r.t. ∇^R, and (when defined on k^R_{X/S}) ∇^R preserves k^R_{X/S}.
Used in the D^c−D identity (Theorem 3.22) and in Lemma 3.14; the preservation condition is explicitly invoked in Remark 3.18.
domain assumption Assumption 3.7(4): ω_X is closed and μ*F^{∇^R} is defined.
Gives the minimal-coupling decomposition ω_X^H = −μ*F^{∇^R} + f*ζ (Lemma 3.10, Corollary 3.11), the source of the ζ-correction.
domain assumption ζ = 0 (or the ζ-corrected degree of Remark 3.18).
The clean correspondence of Corollary 3.24 assumes ζ=0; Remark 3.12 notes ζ can be arranged to vanish in the associated-bundle case, and Remark 3.18 gives the general replacement deg_{ωX,ζ}.
standard math The faithful functor of [LS26, Thm 1.11] and the nonlinear flat/Higgs bundle framework of [LS26].
The paper's problem is to characterize the image of this functor; Theorem 1.1 and Definition 1.3 are invoked as background from the companion paper.
standard math Classical nonabelian Hodge theory [Sim92, Cor. 1.3] and Simpson's lemma [Sim92, Lem. 1.2] in the linear case.
Recovered by the paper in Section 3.4 as the vector-bundle limit; serves as the external benchmark, not as an input to the nonlinear proof.
domain assumption Compactness and (semi-)Kähler assumptions on (S, ω_S) and (Σ, ω_Σ) in the main theorems.
The integration-by-parts/Stokes steps and the Bochner identities need compactness and a fixed Hermitian metric ω_Σ (Convention 4.5); the authors state these as hypotheses rather than deriving them.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear Hodge correspondence for morphisms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XTKDCZ2E

@misc{pith2026260713450,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear Hodge correspondence for morphisms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XTKDCZ2E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13450}
}

read the original abstract

We study Higgs sections, flat sections, and their higher-dimensional and functorial analogues in the setting of nonlinear harmonic bundles. For a harmonic vector bundle over a compact K\"ahler manifold, a global section is flat if and only if it is a Higgs section. We show that for general nonlinear harmonic bundles this equivalence requires the vanishing of a degree obstruction. We then extend the result to sub-fibrations and to morphisms by interpreting morphisms as graph sub-fibrations in a fiber product.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

, title =

Calabi, E. , title =. Annales scientifiques de l'\'Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure , pages =. 1979 , publisher =. doi:10.24033/asens.1367 , mrnumber =

work page doi:10.24033/asens.1367 1979
[2]

Abe, Makoto and Jin, Teisuke and Shima, Tadashi , TITLE =. Arch. Math. (Basel) , FJOURNAL =. 2004 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00013-004-1072-5 , URL =

work page doi:10.1007/s00013-004-1072-5 2004
[3]

Connections, metrics and Higgs fields on complex fiber bundles

Connections, metrics and Higgs fields on complex fiber bundles. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.13838 , archivePrefix =. 2602.13838 , primaryClass =

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.13838
[4]

1996 , PAGES =

Guillemin, Victor and Lerman, Eugene and Sternberg, Shlomo , TITLE =. 1996 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511574788 , URL =

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511574788 1996
[5]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Kodaira-Spencer Map on the Hitchin-Simpson Correspondence. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.14272 , archivePrefix =. 2511.14272 , primaryClass =

doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.14272
[6]

and Xia, Eugene Z

Goldman, William M. and Xia, Eugene Z. , TITLE =. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/memo/0904 , URL =

work page doi:10.1090/memo/0904 2008
[7]

2015 , PAGES =

Sontz, Stephen Bruce , TITLE =. 2015 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15829-7 , URL =

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15829-7 2015
[8]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Higgs bundle, isomonodromic leaves and minimal surfaces. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Show all 76 references

[9]

and Vologodsky, V

Ogus, A. and Vologodsky, V. , TITLE =. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 2007 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/s10240-007-0010-z , URL =

2007 doi
[10]

, TITLE =

Simpson, Carlos T. , TITLE =. Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1992 , PAGES =

1992
[11]

and Berndtsson, Bo , TITLE =

Berman, Robert J. and Berndtsson, Bo , TITLE =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/jams/880 , URL =

2017 doi
[12]

Uhlenbeck, Karen and Yau, Shing-Tung , TITLE =. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1986 , PAGES =. doi:10.1002/cpa.3160390714 , URL =

1986 doi
[13]

Narasimhan, M. S. and Seshadri, C. S. , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1965 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1970710 , URL =

1965 doi
[14]

Azad, Hassan and Biswas, Indranil , TITLE =. Bull. London Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2003 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/S0024609303002182 , URL =

2003 doi
[15]

1985 , PAGES =

Br\"ocker, Theodor and tom Dieck, Tammo , TITLE =. 1985 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12918-0 , URL =

1985 doi
[16]

, TITLE =

Ramanathan, A. , TITLE =. Math. Ann. , FJOURNAL =. 1975 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/BF01343949 , URL =

1975 doi
[17]

Mexican mathematicians in the world---trends and recent contributions , SERIES =

Corro, Diego and Korda , Jan-Bernhard , TITLE =. Mexican mathematicians in the world---trends and recent contributions , SERIES =. [2021] 2021 , ISBN =. doi:10.1090/conm/775/15589 , URL =

2021 doi
[18]

and Wang, Yuan , TITLE =

Lin, Yuandan and Sontag, Eduardo D. and Wang, Yuan , TITLE =. SIAM J. Control Optim. , FJOURNAL =. 1996 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1137/S0363012993259981 , URL =

1996 doi
[19]

, TITLE =

Angeli, David and Sontag, Eduardo D. , TITLE =. Systems Control Lett. , FJOURNAL =. 1999 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/S0167-6911(99)00055-9 , URL =

1999 doi
[20]

Mabuchi, Toshiki , TITLE =. Osaka J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1987 , NUMBER =

1987
[21]

, TITLE =

Simpson, Carlos T. , TITLE =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1988 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1990994 , URL =

1988 doi
[22]

Hitchin, N. J. , TITLE =. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) , FJOURNAL =. 1987 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/plms/s3-55.1.59 , URL =

1987 doi
[23]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Harmonic maps from K \"a hler manifolds. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2010.03545 , archivePrefix =. 2010.03545 , primaryClass =

2010 doi arXiv
[24]

Rollenske, S\"onke and Tomassini, Adriano and Wang, Xu , TITLE =. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s10231-019-00903-3 , URL =

2020 doi
[25]

Singer, I. M. , TITLE =. Pacific J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1959 , PAGES =

1959
[26]

and Schoen, Richard M

Korevaar, Nicholas J. and Schoen, Richard M. , TITLE =. Comm. Anal. Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/CAG.1997.v5.n2.a4 , URL =

1997 doi
[27]

and Schoen, Richard M

Korevaar, Nicholas J. and Schoen, Richard M. , TITLE =. Comm. Anal. Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1993 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/CAG.1993.v1.n4.a4 , URL =

1993 doi
[28]

and Haefliger, Andr\'e , TITLE =

Bridson, Martin R. and Haefliger, Andr\'e , TITLE =. 1999 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12494-9 , URL =

1999 doi
[29]

Darvas, Tam\'as , TITLE =. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4171/jems/1104 , URL =

2021 doi
[30]

Darvas, Tam\'as , TITLE =. Amer. J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1353/ajm.2017.0032 , URL =

2017
[31]

Chen, Xiuxiong , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2000 , NUMBER =

2000
[32]

arXiv e-prints , pages =

Notes on harmonic maps , author=. arXiv e-prints , pages =
[33]

and Zelditch, Steve , TITLE =

Rubinstein, Yanir A. and Zelditch, Steve , TITLE =. J. Symplectic Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2010 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/jsg.2010.v8.n3.a1 , URL =

2010 doi
[34]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

The metric completion of the Riemannian space of K \"a hler metrics. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1401.7857 , archivePrefix =. 1401.7857 , primaryClass =

doi arXiv
[35]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Canonical metrics on holomorphic fibre bundles. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2202.11630 , archivePrefix =. 2202.11630 , primaryClass =

doi arXiv
[36]

Schumacher, Georg , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2012 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-012-0374-7 , URL =

2012 doi
[37]

Müller, Niklas , TITLE =. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/blms.70012 , URL =

2025 doi
[38]

Rizzi, Luca and Zucconi, Francesco , TITLE =. Rend. Mat. Appl. (7) , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =

2025
[39]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Yixuan Fu and Mao Sheng , title= ". arXiv e-prints , keywords =. 2025 , eid =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.06050 , archivePrefix=. 2509.06050 , primaryClass=

2025 doi arXiv
[40]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Nonlinear Hodge correspondence in positive characteristic. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.05578 , archivePrefix =. 2510.05578 , primaryClass =

doi
[41]

Chen, Ting , TITLE =. Cent. Eur. J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2012 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2478/s11533-011-0110-3 , URL =

2012 doi
[42]

Lins Neto, Alcides , TITLE =. Ann. Sci. \'Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) , FJOURNAL =. 2002 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/S0012-9593(02)01089-3 , URL =

2002 doi
[43]

2015 , PAGES =

Brunella, Marco , TITLE =. 2015 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14310-1 , URL =

2015 doi
[44]

Fujiki, Akira , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1978 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01403162 , URL =

1978 doi
[45]

Atiyah, M. F. , TITLE =. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1957 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1992969 , URL =

1957 doi
[46]

Weil, Andr. G. Journal de Mathematiques pures et appliqu
[47]

2017 , PAGES =

McDuff, Dusa and Salamon, Dietmar , TITLE =. 2017 , PAGES =. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198794899.001.0001 , URL =

2017
[48]

Fine, Joel , TITLE =. Math. Res. Lett. , FJOURNAL =. 2007 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/MRL.2007.v14.n2.a7 , URL =

2007 doi
[49]

2025 , eprint=

Moduli of polarised manifolds via canonical K\"ahler metrics , author=. 2025 , eprint=

2025
[50]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Mao Sheng , title=. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. 2025 , eid =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.04809 , archivePrefix=. 2509.06050 , primaryClass=

2025 doi
[51]

Anchouche, Boudjemaa and Biswas, Indranil , TITLE =. Amer. J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2001 , NUMBER =

2001
[52]

, TITLE =

Lieberman, David I. , TITLE =. Group actions and vector fields (. 1982 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/BFb0101512 , URL =

1982 doi
[53]

Ortu, Annamaria , TITLE =. Adv. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2023.108868 , URL =

2023
[54]

Optimal symplectic connections on holomorphic submersions , JOURNAL =

Dervan, Ruadha\'i. Optimal symplectic connections on holomorphic submersions , JOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1002/cpa.21930 , URL =

2021 doi
[55]

Moduli theory, stability of fibrations and optimal symplectic connections , JOURNAL =

Dervan, Ruadha\'i. Moduli theory, stability of fibrations and optimal symplectic connections , JOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/gt.2021.25.2643 , URL =

2021 doi
[56]

Uniqueness of optimal symplectic connections , JOURNAL =

Dervan, Ruadha\'i. Uniqueness of optimal symplectic connections , JOURNAL =. 2021 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/fms.2021.15 , URL =

2021 doi
[57]

Hallam, Michael , TITLE =. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/jlms.12775 , URL =

2023 doi
[58]

R\"ohrl, Helmut , TITLE =. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1962 , PAGES =. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1962-10715-0 , URL =

1962 doi
[59]

2013 , publisher=

Advanced differential geometry for theoreticians: fiber bundles, jet manifolds and Lagrangian theory , author=. 2013 , publisher=

2013
[60]

Manuscripta Math

Vaisman, Izu , TITLE =. Manuscripta Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1988 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01258267 , URL =

1988 doi
[61]

, TITLE =

Michor, Peter W. , TITLE =. 2008 , PAGES =. doi:10.1090/gsm/093 , URL =

2008 doi
[62]

1972 , PAGES =

Kobayashi, Shoshichi , TITLE =. 1972 , PAGES =

1972
[63]

1997 , PAGES =

Tondeur, Philippe , TITLE =. 1997 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8914-8 , URL =

1997 doi
[64]

Donaldson, S. K. , TITLE =. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) , FJOURNAL =. 1987 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/plms/s3-55.1.127 , URL =

1987 doi
[65]

Duke Math

Hitchin, Nigel , TITLE =. Duke Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 1987 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-87-05408-1 , URL =

1987 doi
[66]

, TITLE =

Simpson, Carlos T. , TITLE =. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 1990 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2307/1990935 , URL =

1990 doi
[67]

, TITLE =

Simpson, Carlos T. , TITLE =. Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1994 , PAGES =

1994
[68]

Algebraic geometry---

Simpson, Carlos , TITLE =. Algebraic geometry---. 1997 , ISBN =. doi:10.1090/pspum/062.2/1492538 , URL =

1997 doi
[69]

Corlette, Kevin , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1988 , NUMBER =

1988
[70]

Yokogawa, K\^oji , TITLE =. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. , FJOURNAL =. 1993 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/kjm/1250519269 , URL =

1993
[71]

Witten, Edward , TITLE =. J. Geom. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 2015 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2015.02.017 , URL =

2015 doi
[72]

and Yokogawa, K\^oji , TITLE =

Boden, Hans U. and Yokogawa, K\^oji , TITLE =. Internat. J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1996 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1142/S0129167X96000311 , URL =

1996 doi
[73]

Logares, Marina and Martens, Johan , TITLE =. J. Reine Angew. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2010 , PAGES =. doi:10.1515/CRELLE.2010.090 , URL =

2010 doi
[74]

, TITLE =

Sipe, Patricia L. , TITLE =. Holomorphic functions and moduli,. 1988 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9611-6\_19 , URL =

1988 doi
[75]

, TITLE =

Atiyah, Michael F. , TITLE =. Ann. Sci. \'. 1971 , PAGES =

1971
[76]

, title =

Hain, Richard M. , title =. Current Topics in Complex Algebraic Geometry , volume =. 1994 , editor =

1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

, title =

Calabi, E. , title =. Annales scientifiques de l'\'Ecole Normale Sup\'erieure , pages =. 1979 , publisher =. doi:10.24033/asens.1367 , mrnumber =

work page doi:10.24033/asens.1367 1979

[2] [2]

Abe, Makoto and Jin, Teisuke and Shima, Tadashi , TITLE =. Arch. Math. (Basel) , FJOURNAL =. 2004 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00013-004-1072-5 , URL =

work page doi:10.1007/s00013-004-1072-5 2004

[3] [3]

Connections, metrics and Higgs fields on complex fiber bundles

Connections, metrics and Higgs fields on complex fiber bundles. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.13838 , archivePrefix =. 2602.13838 , primaryClass =

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.13838

[4] [4]

1996 , PAGES =

Guillemin, Victor and Lerman, Eugene and Sternberg, Shlomo , TITLE =. 1996 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511574788 , URL =

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511574788 1996

[5] [5]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Kodaira-Spencer Map on the Hitchin-Simpson Correspondence. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.14272 , archivePrefix =. 2511.14272 , primaryClass =

doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.14272

[6] [6]

and Xia, Eugene Z

Goldman, William M. and Xia, Eugene Z. , TITLE =. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/memo/0904 , URL =

work page doi:10.1090/memo/0904 2008

[7] [7]

2015 , PAGES =

Sontz, Stephen Bruce , TITLE =. 2015 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15829-7 , URL =

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15829-7 2015

[8] [8]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Higgs bundle, isomonodromic leaves and minimal surfaces. arXiv e-prints , keywords =