Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Global solvability in a higher-dimensional chemotaxis system for Alopecia Areata: Nonlinear proliferation versus logistic degradation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves global solvability for the Alopecia Areata chemotaxis system: bounded classical solutions above an explicit damping threshold or with superquadratic degradation, and weak solutions for any positive damping.

desk verdict Genuine improvement in classical and first weak-solution results for the AA chemotaxis model, but the printed proof of the quadratic threshold skips a load-bearing continuity step and Theorem 1.2 overclaims its exponents. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03565 v3 pith:XTRMDJKB submitted 2025-06-04 math.AP

Haotian Tang , Jiashan Zheng This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35A0135K2035K5535Q9292C17
keywords AlopeciaAreatachemotaxisglobalboundedclassicalsolutionweaklogisticdampingmaximalSobolevregularityMoseriterationAubin-Lionslemma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a three-component chemotaxis system for Alopecia Areata in which CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are attracted by IFN-$\gamma$ and the CD8+ population grows through a nonlinear proliferation term $ruv$. It aims to show that global solvability is governed by how strongly the two logistic degradation terms act: if both exponents $r_i$ are greater than $2$, unique globally bounded classical solutions exist for every positive damping rate; if $r_1=r_2=2$, the same conclusion holds once the smaller damping rate exceeds an explicit threshold $\mu^\star$ that depends only on the dimension, the chemotactic sensitivities, and $r$. Under only $\mu_i>0$ in the quadratic case, the paper constructs global weak solutions in $N\ge 3$ without requiring convexity of the domain. A sympathetic reader would care because these results turn earlier piecewise conditions on the degradation exponents and dimension into a single quantitative picture, and give the first weak-solution theory for this model.

What carries the argument

Two tools carry the argument. Lemma 2.2 is an elementary minimization identity: with $A_1$ fixed by $\delta$, the minimum over $y>0$ of $H(y)=y+A_1 y^{-\delta}(2\chi)^{\delta+1}C_{\delta+1}$ is exactly $2(\delta-1)/\delta\, C_{\delta+1}^{1/(\delta+1)}\chi$; this converts the testing estimates into the explicit threshold $\mu^\star$. Lemma 2.4 is the maximal Sobolev regularity estimate for the Neumann heat equation, giving control of $\|\Delta w\|_{L^\gamma}$ and $\|w\|_{L^\gamma}$ in terms of $\|u+v\|_{L^\gamma}$; feeding this into the $u^{q-1}$- and $v^{q-1}$-testing bootstrap raises integrability from $L^1$ to any $L^p$, and the Moser-type iteration then yields $L^\infty$ bounds. For the weak solutions, the regularized system (4.1) with $F_\varepsilon(s)=1/(1+\varepsilon s)^{N+1}$, entropy-type estimates involving $\int |\nabla u_\varepsilon|^2/u_\varepsilon$ and $\int |\nabla v_\varepsilon|^2/v_\varepsilon$, and the Aubin-Lions lemma supply the compactness needed to pass to the limit.

What would settle it

Take $N=3$, a unit ball $\Omega$, fixed $\chi_1=\chi_2=1$ and $r=1$; solve the linear Neumann heat equation to compute the maximal-regularity constant $C_\gamma$ for $\gamma=N/2+1\pm\varepsilon$. If $C_\gamma$ shows a discontinuity or grows faster than the margin by which $\min\{\mu_1,\mu_2\}$ exceeds the $q_0$-coefficient, the bootstrap step (3.22)-(3.23) has no $q_0>N/2$ and the claimed threshold is not justified. Alternatively, a direct simulation of (1.2) with $\min\{\mu_1,\mu_2\}$ slightly above $\mu^\star$ that shows unbounded $u$ or $v$ would refute Theorem 1.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the fully parabolic Alopecia Areata system cannot blow up under natural damping conditions. Theorem 1.1 states that for smooth bounded domains $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^N$, $N\ge 3$, and initial data as in (1.3), a unique global bounded classical solution exists either when $r_1=r_2=2$ and $\min\{\mu_1,\mu_2\}$ exceeds $$\mu^\star=\frac{2(N-2)_+}{N}\,C_{\frac N2+1}^{\frac1{\frac N2+1}}\max\{\chi_1,\chi_2\}+\left[\left(\frac2N\right)^{\frac2{N+2}}\frac N{N+2}\right]r,$$ or when $r_i>2$ for $i=1,2$, with no lower bound on $\mu_i$. Theorem 1.2 states that in the quadratic case any $\mu_i>0$ still yields a global weak solution in the sense of Definition 1.1. The proofs proceed by an $L^p$ bootstrap using maximal Sobolev regularity, followed by Moser iteration, and for the weak solutions by $\varepsilon$-regularization, $\varepsilon$-independent estimates, and an Aubin-Lions compactness argument.

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on the unstated assumption that the constants $C_\gamma$ in the maximal regularity estimate vary continuously just above $\gamma=N/2+1$, so that some exponent $q_0>N/2$ still satisfies the strict damping inequality used to close the bootstrap; if those constants jump upward, the quadratic-case threshold may be too low.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $N\ge 3$ and any sufficiently smooth initial data, superquadratic degradation $r_i>2$ ($i=1,2$) alone guarantees a unique globally bounded classical solution, with no lower bound on the damping rates $\mu_1,\mu_2$.
  • In the quadratic case, bounded classical solutions exist whenever $\min\{\mu_1,\mu_2\}$ exceeds the explicit threshold $\mu^\star$, making the competition between logistic damping, chemotaxis, and proliferation quantitative.
  • The earlier restrictions $r_1\ge r_2$ and $r_i\le 1+2(N+2)/N$, which tied the two degradation exponents together, are removed.
  • For any $\mu_i>0$ in the quadratic case, a global weak solution exists in $N\ge 3$ even in nonconvex domains; this is the first weak-solution existence result for this system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the explicit form of $\mu^\star$ suggests a sharp-transition prediction: below this threshold, chemotaxis and proliferation may overwhelm damping and finite-time blow-up becomes plausible, a testable statement the paper itself does not make.
  • Editorial inference: the same bootstrap structure, testing with $u^{q-1}$, maximal Sobolev regularity, then Moser iteration, should transfer to other multi-component chemotaxis systems with two positive chemotaxis terms and quadratic cross-production, giving analogous explicit damping thresholds.
  • Editorial inference: since the weak solution is obtained without convexity and eventual smoothness is deferred to future work, a natural next test is whether the weak solution becomes classical after finite time; the entropy-type estimates used here are the natural input for such a regularity result.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Neumann initial-boundary value problem for a three-component chemotaxis system modelling Alopecia Areata, with two chemotaxis terms, a nonlinear proliferation term ruv, and generalized logistic degradation terms -μ1 u^{r1}, -μ2 v^{r2}. The main claims are: (Theorem 1.1) global bounded classical solutions exist for N≥3 either when r1=r2=2 and min{μ1,μ2} exceeds an explicit threshold μ*, or when r1>2 and r2>2; and (Theorem 1.2) for arbitrary μ1,μ2>0 a global weak solution exists. The proofs use a bootstrap based on maximal Sobolev regularity, Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Young inequalities (Section 3), and a regularized problem with an Aubin-Lions compactness argument (Section 4). The paper is written in a standard style for this literature and proposes an explicit, parameter-free threshold.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper would extend the known three-dimensional and four/five-dimensional results of Lou-Tao and Zhang-Xu to all N≥3 with a quantitative lower bound on the logistic damping, and it would provide a first weak-solution theory for this system with arbitrarily small μi>0. The superquadratic case r_i>2 is treated by a separate, plausible estimate in Lemma 3.4, and the weak-solution argument has a coherent regularization strategy. The explicit threshold and the absence of fitted parameters are strengths. However, the quadratic-case proof contains a load-bearing algebraic error in Lemma 2.2, an unproved continuity property of the maximal-regularity constants near the critical exponent, and the weak-solution theorem is stated more broadly than the proof actually covers. These issues affect the two central claims as printed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 2.2, Eqs. (2.1)-(2.3)] The constant A1 defined in (2.1) does not satisfy the minimization formula (2.3). For δ=2, χ=1 and C_3=1, the function H(y)=y+(5/9)y^{-2}·8 has its minimum at y≈2.071 with value ≈3.107, whereas (2.3) gives 1. The coefficient that makes (2.3) true is A1=(1/(δ+1))((δ+1)/δ)^{-δ}((δ-1)/δ)^{δ+1}, which is also the coefficient actually produced by Young's inequality in (3.13), not the printed A1. Since Lemma 3.3 uses Lemma 2.2 at (3.22) to replace A1λ0^{-q}χ^{q+1}C_{q+1}2^{q+1}+λ0 by 2(q-1)/q C_{q+1}^{1/(q+1)}χ, the stated threshold μ* in Theorem 1.1 is not the threshold derived by the estimates; with the correct coefficient an additional dimension-dependent factor remains. This is a load-bearing gap in the quadratic case r1=r2=2.
  2. [Lemma 3.3, Eqs. (3.22)-(3.23)] The condition μ_i>μ* is verified only at q=N/2, i.e. at γ=N/2+1, but the bootstrap requires a q0>N/2 satisfying the strict inequality μ_i>2(q0-1)/q0 C_{q0+1}^{1/(q0+1)}χ+r(1/q0)^{1/(q0+1)}q0/(q0+1). Lemma 2.4 only asserts existence of C_γ for each fixed γ and gives no continuity or one-sided boundedness near γ=N/2+1. If C_{q0+1} grows rapidly as q0↓N/2, the margin μ_i-μ* could be absorbed and no admissible q0>N/2 would exist. The subsequent W^{1,r} bound for w with r>N, the L^∞ bound for w, and the final Moser step in Lemma 3.3 all depend on this q0, so a right-continuity or limsup property of C_γ must be proved or the bootstrap must be restructured.
  3. [Theorem 1.2 and Section 4] Theorem 1.2 states global weak solutions for the system (1.2) with r_i≥2, but Section 4 begins with the restriction r1=r2=2, Definition 1.1 uses the quadratic terms μ1u^2 and μ2v^2, and the regularized problem (4.1) and all estimates in Lemmas 4.2-4.6 are written only for quadratic degradation. No construction is given for r1>2 or r2>2. The statement of Theorem 1.2, and the corresponding sentence in the abstract, must be restricted to r1=r2=2, or the weak-solution proof must be extended to general r_i.
  4. [Lemma 4.4, Eq. (4.28)] The estimate ∫wε lnuε ≤ ε1∫(ln uε)^2+C1∫wε^2 ≤ ε1∫uε^2+C2 is not valid uniformly in ε because (ln s)^2/s^2 is unbounded as s↓0. This estimate is used to obtain (4.30) and hence the key bound (4.26) on ∫|∇uε|^2/uε and ∫|∇vε|^2/vε. A different treatment of the term ∫wε lnuε, for example using (ln u)_+≤u and Young's inequality on wu, is needed to complete the proof of Lemma 4.4.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Theorem 1.1] The abstract contains the typo 'min{μ1, μ1}' instead of 'min{μ1, μ2}', and the phrase 'Whether ... or ...' should be replaced by 'If ... or ...' throughout the statements.
  2. [Eq. (3.53)] In Lemma 3.5, the left-hand side of (3.53) should read d/dt(∫u^{p_k}+∫v^{p_k}), not d/dt(∫u^{p_k}+∫u^{p_k}).
  3. [Theorem 1.1] The statement should explicitly note that the r_i>2 case requires both exponents to be strictly larger than 2, so mixed cases such as r1=2, r2>2 are not covered; this would help readers avoid an overly general reading.
  4. [Lemma 3.5] The Moser iteration is omitted by reference to [29]; since it is load-bearing for the L^∞ bounds, the authors should include at least the induction step or clearly state the required constant recursion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the μ* threshold is an explicit formula and the regularity lemmas are standard external tools, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. Theorem 1.1 is proved from the local existence result (Lemma 3.1, quoted from Lou and Tao), an L1-bound (Lemma 3.2, proved in the paper), and then bootstrap estimates in Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4 that use only Gagliardo-Nirenberg interpolation (Lemma 2.1), Young's inequality, and maximal Sobolev regularity (Lemma 2.4). The threshold μ* is an explicit closed-form expression obtained by minimizing the scalar function H(y) in Lemma 2.2, not a constant fitted to make the conclusion true. No parameter in the proof is calibrated to the final boundedness estimate; the μ_i assumptions are used to make the coefficients of the L^{q+1} terms negative, and the remaining terms are absorbed by the dissipative terms. The maximal-regularity constants C_γ come from a standard linear heat-semigroup estimate (Lemma 2.4), and although two cited sources include one of the present authors, the estimate is an independent standard tool and is not equivalent to the target theorem. The weak-solution part (Theorem 1.2) is obtained as a limit of the regularized system (4.1), using ε-independent bounds, compactness from the Aubin-Lions lemma, and a direct verification of the weak formulation, so there is no circular reduction. The reviewer-flagged issue in Lemma 3.3—passing from μ_i > μ* at q = N/2 to an open neighborhood q0 > N/2 with the same strict inequality—requires an unstated right-continuity or boundedness property of C_{q+1} near q = N/2; this is a potential correctness gap in the written proof, not a circularity. Similarly, Theorem 1.2 as printed quantifies all r_i ≥ 2 while Section 4 explicitly treats only r_1 = r_2 = 2; this is a consistency gap, not a circularity. No step in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters, axioms beyond standard PDE tools, or invented entities. The threshold μ* is a closed-form expression (with the regularity constant C_{N/2+1} left as an external constant), and the proofs rely on classical lemmas.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Gagliardo-Nirenberg interpolation inequality (Lemma 2.1)
    Used throughout Sections 3 and 4 to convert L^p bounds into gradient estimates; cited from [19,36].
  • standard math Maximal Sobolev regularity for the heat equation (Lemma 2.4)
    Used to bound L^γ norms of Δw and w by powers of u+v; cited from [14,43].
  • standard math Reciprocal parabolic smoothing estimate (Lemma 2.5)
    Gives W^{1,q} bounds for w from L^γ bounds on u+v; cited from [8,13].
  • standard math Aubin-Lions compactness lemma
    Used in Lemma 4.6 to extract strongly convergent subsequences; cited from [22].
  • standard math Local existence and extensibility criterion for the classical system
    Lemma 3.1, quoted from [16], supplies the maximal existence time and blow-up criterion on which Theorem 1.1 depends.
  • domain assumption Smooth bounded domain and Neumann boundary data with initial data in C^0(Ω) and w0∈W^{1,∞}(Ω)
    Assumption (1.3) is part of the problem statement and is needed for local classical solvability and the energy estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global solvability in a higher-dimensional chemotaxis system for Alopecia Areata: Nonlinear proliferation versus logistic degradation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XTRMDJKB

@misc{pith2026250603565,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global solvability in a higher-dimensional chemotaxis system for Alopecia Areata: Nonlinear proliferation versus logistic degradation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XTRMDJKB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03565}
}
abstract

This paper is concerned with the Neumann initial-boundary value problem for the chemotaxis system: $u_t=\Delta u-\chi_1\nabla\cdot(u\nabla w)+w-\mu_1u^{r_1}$, $v_t=\Delta v-\chi_2\nabla\cdot(v\nabla w)+w+ruv-\mu_2v^{r_2}$, and $w_t=\Delta w+u+v-w$ in $\Omega\times(0,\infty)$, which was initially proposed by Dobreva et al. to describe the dynamics of hair loss in Alopecia Areata form. Here, $\Omega\subset\mathbb R^{N}$ $(N\geq3)$ is a smooth bounded domain, and the parameters fulfill $\chi_{i}>0$, $\mu_{i}>0$, $r_{i}\geq2$ $(i=1,2)$ and $r>0$. The inherent presence of two positive chemotaxis terms, along with the zero-order nonlinear production term $ruv$, significantly complicates the energy estimation. It is proved that if $r_{1}=r_{2}=2$ and $\min\{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}\}>\mu^{\star}$ or $r_{i}>2$ $(i=1,2)$, this problem admits a global bounded classical solution for all sufficiently smooth initial data. The lower bound is given by $\mu^{\star}=\frac{2(N-2)_{+}}{N}C_{\frac{N}{2}+1}^{\frac{1}{\frac{N}{2}+1}}\max\{\chi_{1},\chi_{2}\}+\left[(\frac{2}{N})^{\frac{2}{N+2}}\frac{N}{N+2}\right]r$, where $C_{\frac{N}{2}+1}$ is a positive constant corresponding to the maximal Sobolev regularity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the basic assumption $\mu_{i}>0$ $(i=1,2)$ is sufficient to guarantee the global existence of weak solutions for $N\geq3$. Notably, our findings not only extend or refine several existing results (see Remarks 1.1-1.2) but also provide new insights into the weak solution theory of this system for the first time.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dobreva, R

    A. Dobreva, R. Paus, N.G. Cogan, Analysing the dynamics of a model for alopecia areata as an autoimmune disorder of hair follicle cycling,Math. Med. Biol.,35(2017), 387–407

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Dobreva, R

    A. Dobreva, R. Paus, N.G. Cogan, Mathematical model for alopecia areata,J. Theor. Biol.380(2015), 332–345

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Dobreva, R

    A. Dobreva, R. Paus, N.G. Cogan, Toward predicting the spatio-temporal dynamics of alopecia areata lesions using partial differential equation analysis,Bull. Math. Biol.,82 (2020), no. 34

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Gilhar, A

    A. Gilhar, A. Etzioni, R. Paus, Medical progress: alopecia areata,N. Eng. J. Med.366 (2012), 1515–1525

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Gilhar, R.S

    A. Gilhar, R.S. Kalish, Alopecia areata: a tissue specific autoimmune disease of the hair follicle,Autoimmune Rev.,5(2006), 64–69

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Giordano, A.A

    C.N. Giordano, A.A. Sinha, Cytokine pathways and interactions in alopecia areata,Eur. J. Dermatol.23(2013), 308–318

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    P. Gao, L. Xu, Global boundedness and asymptotic behavior of the chemotaxis system for alopecia areata with singular sensitivity,Results Math.,22(2024), 100450

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Horstmann, M

    D. Horstmann, M. Winkler, Boundedness vs. blow-up in a chemotaxis system,J. Diff. Equ.,215(2005), 52–107

    work page 2005

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    T. Ito, H. Hashizume, T. Shimauchi, et al., CXCL10 produced from hair follicles induces Th1 and Tc1 cell infiltration in the acute phase of alopecia areata followed by sustained Tc1 accumulation in the chronic phase,J. Dermatol. Sci.,69(2013), 140–147

    2013

  2. [10]

    T. Ito, N. Saatoff, M. Hashizume, et al., Maintenance of hair follicle immune privilege is linked to prevention of NK cell attack,J. Invest. Dermatol.,128(2008), 1196–1206

    2008

  3. [11]

    Z. Jiao, I. Jadlovsk´ a, T. Li, Global existence in a fully parabolic attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system with singular sensitivities and proliferation,J. Diff. Equ.,411(2024), 227–267

    2024

  4. [12]

    Kalabokes, Alopecia areata: support groups and meetings-how can it help your patient?Dermatol

    V.D. Kalabokes, Alopecia areata: support groups and meetings-how can it help your patient?Dermatol. Therapy,24(2011), 302–304

    2011

  5. [13]

    Kowalczyk, Z

    R. Kowalczyk, Z. Szyma´ nska, On the global existence of solutions to an aggregation model,J. Math. Anal. Appl.,343(2008), 379–398. 29

    2008

  6. [14]

    Y. Ke, J. Zheng, A note for global existence of a two-dimensional chemotaxis-haptotaxis model with remodeling of non-diffusible attractant,Nonlinearity,31(2018), 4602–4620

    2018

  7. [15]

    Lankeit, Eventual smoothness and asymptotics in a three-dimensional chemotaxis system with logistic source,J

    J. Lankeit, Eventual smoothness and asymptotics in a three-dimensional chemotaxis system with logistic source,J. Differ. Equ.,258(2015), 1158–1191

    2015

  8. [16]

    Y. Lou, Y. Tao, The role of local kinetics in a three-component chemotaxis model for Alopecia Areata,J. Diff. Equ.,305(2021), 401–427

    2021

  9. [17]

    Gwillim, K.R Patel, et al., Epidemiology of alopecia areata, ophiasis, totalis, and universalis: a systematic review and meta–analysis,J

    H.H, Lee, E. Gwillim, K.R Patel, et al., Epidemiology of alopecia areata, ophiasis, totalis, and universalis: a systematic review and meta–analysis,J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.,82 (2020), 675–682

    2020

  10. [18]

    X. Liu, J. Zheng, Convergence rates of solutions in a predator-prey system with indirect pursuit-evasion interaction in domains of arbitrary dimension,Disc. Cont. Dyna. Syst. B,28(2023), 2269–2293

    2023

  11. [19]

    Nirenberg, An extended interpolation inequality,Ann

    L. Nirenberg, An extended interpolation inequality,Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa,20 (1966), 733–737

    1966

  12. [20]

    D. Qi, Y. Ke, Large time behavior in a predator-prey system with pursuit-evasion inter- action,Disc. Cont. Dyna. Syst. B,27(2022), 4531–4549

    2022

  13. [21]

    S. Qiu. Y. Zhang, X. Tu, Boundedness and asymptotic stability of solutions in an alopecia areata chemotaxis system with signal-dependent sensitivity,Z. Angew. Math. Phys.,75 (2024), no. 215

    2024

  14. [22]

    Simon, Compact Sets in the SpaceL p(0, T;B),Annali di Matematica Pura ed Appli- cata,146(1986), 65–96

    J. Simon, Compact Sets in the SpaceL p(0, T;B),Annali di Matematica Pura ed Appli- cata,146(1986), 65–96

    1986

  15. [23]

    W. Shan, X. Yang, Global solvability and stability of a quasilinear chemotaxis system for Alopecia Areata,Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.,35(2023), 1763–1809

    2023

  16. [24]

    W. Shan, P. Zheng, Boundedness and asymptotic behavior in a quasilinear chemotaxis system for alopecia areata,Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl.,72(2023), 103858

    2023

  17. [25]

    W. Shan, P. Zheng, Stability and instability in a three-component chemotaxis model for alopecia areata,Phys. D,455(2023), 133884

    2023

  18. [26]

    Song, W, Zuo, Spatiotemporal dynamics of a three-component chemotaxis model for alopecia areata,Chaos Solitons Fractals,169(2023), 113223

    B. Song, W, Zuo, Spatiotemporal dynamics of a three-component chemotaxis model for alopecia areata,Chaos Solitons Fractals,169(2023), 113223

    2023

  19. [27]

    X. Tu, S. Qiu, J, Zhang, Boundedness in the higher-dimensional chemotaxis system for Alopecia Areata with singular sensitivity,Appl. Math. Lett.,158(2024), 109231

    2024

  20. [28]

    Tello, M

    J.I. Tello, M. Winkler, A chemotaxis system with logistic source,Comm. Partial Differ. Equ.32(2007), 849–877

    2007

  21. [29]

    Y. Tao, D. Xu, Combined effects of nonlinear proliferation and logistic damping in a three-component chemotaxis system for alopecia areata,Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl.,66(2022), 103517. 30

    2022

  22. [30]

    H. Tang, J. Zheng, K. Li, Global and bounded solution to a quasilinear parabolic-elliptic pursuit-evasion system inN-dimensional domains,J. Math. Anal. Appl.,527(2023), 127406

    2023

  23. [31]

    Winkler, Boundedness in the higher-dimensional parabolic-parabolic chemotaxis sys- tem with logistic source,Comm

    M. Winkler, Boundedness in the higher-dimensional parabolic-parabolic chemotaxis sys- tem with logistic source,Comm. Partial Differ. Equ.35(2010), 1516–1537

    2010

  24. [32]

    Y. Wang, Y. Ke, Large time behavior of solution to a fully parabolic chemotaxis- haptotaxis model in higher dimensions,J. Differ. Equ.,260(2016), 6960–6988

    2016

  25. [33]

    Xiang, Chemotactic aggregation versus logistic damping on boundedness in the 3D minimal Keller-Segel model,SIAM J

    T. Xiang, Chemotactic aggregation versus logistic damping on boundedness in the 3D minimal Keller-Segel model,SIAM J. Appl. Math.,78(2018), 2420–2438

    2018

  26. [34]

    Xiang, How strong a logistic damping can prevent blow-up for the minimal Keller- Segel chemotaxis system?J

    T. Xiang, How strong a logistic damping can prevent blow-up for the minimal Keller- Segel chemotaxis system?J. Math. Anal. Appl.,459(2018), 1172–1200

    2018

  27. [35]

    L. Xu, Q. Xin, H. Yang, Boundedness in a three-component chemotaxis system with nonlinear diffusion for alopecia areata,J. Math. Anal. Appl.,520(2023), 126893

    2023

  28. [36]

    Xiang, J

    T. Xiang, J. Zheng, A new result for 2D boundedness of solutions to a chemotaxis- haptotaxis model with/without sub-logistic source,Nonlinearity,32(2019), 4890–4911

    2019

  29. [37]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. Fu, Global and exponential stabilization of a chemotactic alopecia areata model with signal-dependent diffusion and sensitivity,Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 86(2025), 104404

    2025

  30. [38]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. Fu, Global behavior of solutions in a chemotaxis model for alopecia areata with signal-dependent sensitivity,Disc. Cont. Dyna. Syst. B,30(2025), 2920–2943

    2025

  31. [39]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. Fu, Uniform boundedness and asymptotic behavior of solutions in a chemo- taxis model for alopecia areata,Z. Angew. Math. Phys.,75(2024), no. 212

    2024

  32. [40]

    Zheng, Y

    J. Zheng, Y. Ke, Blow-up prevention by logistic source in a n-d chemotaxis-convection model of capillary-sprout growth during tumor angiogenesis,Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 22(2023), 100–126

    2023

  33. [41]

    Zheng, Y

    J. Zheng, Y. Ke, Global bounded weak solutions for a chemotaxis-Stokes system with nonlinear diffusion and rotation,J. Differ. Equ.,289(2021), 182–235

    2021

  34. [42]

    Zheng, Y

    J. Zheng, Y. Ke, Large time behavior of solutions to a fully parabolic chemotaxis- haptotaxis model in N dimensions,J. Differ. Equ.,266(2019), 1969–2018

    2019

  35. [43]

    Zheng, Y

    J. Zheng, Y. Li, G. Bao, X, Zou, A new result for global existence and boundedness of solutions to a parabolic-parabolic Keller-Segel system with logistic source,J. Math. Anal. Appl.,462(2018), 1–25

    2018

  36. [44]

    C. Zhou, X. Li, C. Wang, J. Zhang, Alopecia areata: an update on etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, and management,Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.,61(2021), 403–423

    2021

  37. [45]

    F. Zhao, H. Tang, J. Zheng, K. Li, Existence and boundedness of solutions for a parabolic-parabolic predator-prey model,Electron. J. Differ. Equ.,2025(2025), 1–17. 31

    2025

  38. [46]

    Zheng, J

    J. Zheng, J. Xie, Some further progress for boundedness of solutions to a quasilin- ear higher-dimensional chemotaxis-haptotaxis model with nonlinear diffusion,Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.,44(2024), 18–60

    2024

  39. [47]

    Zhang, L

    W. Zhang, L. Xu, Q. Xin, Global boundedness of a higher-dimensional chemotaxis sys- tem on alopecia areata,Math. Biosci. Eng.,20(2023), 7922–7942

    2023

  40. [48]

    L. Zhou, F. Zeng, L. Huang, Boundedness and asymptotic behavior in a quasilinear chemotaxis system with nonlinear diffusion and singular sensitivity for alopecia areata, Results Math.,23(2024), 100473

    2024

  41. [49]

    F. Zhao, J. Zheng, K. Li, Global existence and boundedness to an N-D chemotaxis- convection model during tumor angiogenesis,Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl.,82 (2025), 104257

    2025

  42. [50]

    Zhang, S

    W. Zhang, S. Zhao, Q. Xin, Boundedness in a three-component quasilinear chemotaxis system on Alopecia Areata,Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B,29(2024), 1744–1763

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.