Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Fractional anisotropic Calder\'on problem with external data

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann data for the fractional Laplace–Beltrami operator determine a smooth Riemannian metric up to an exterior-fixing diffeomorphism.

desk verdict Solves a real open problem with two serious proofs; the main unresolved thread is a load-bearing exterior-fixing diffeomorphism claim that currently rests on a private communication. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00710 v1 pith:XW3LMVZG submitted 2025-02-02 math.AP

Ali Feizmohammadi , Tuhin Ghosh , Katya Krupchyk , Angkana Rüland , Johannes Sjöstrand , Gunther Uhlmann This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35R3035R1135S1558J35
keywords fractionalCalderónproblemanisotropicinverseproblemsLaplace–BeltramioperatorpartialexteriorDirichlet–to–Neumannmapheatkernelrecoveryellipticextensiontransmission-conditionregularityuniquecontinuation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to settle the fractional analogue of the anisotropic Calderón problem when measurements are made only outside a bounded domain in Euclidean space. Its central claim is that partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann data for the fractional Laplace–Beltrami operator always determine the Riemannian metric up to a diffeomorphism that fixes the exterior, and nothing else. If true, this means that nonlocal exterior measurements carry the same geometric information as boundary measurements on a closed manifold, and that diffeomorphism gauge invariance is the only obstruction to uniqueness. The result is shown by two independent routes, one via heat-semigroup and pseudodifferential arguments and one via a variable-coefficient elliptic extension.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the fractional Laplace–Beltrami operator $(-\Delta_g)^\alpha$, defined by functional calculus, together with its partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann map $\Lambda_g^{W_1,W_2}$, which records the restriction to $W_2$ of $(-\Delta_g)^\alpha$ applied to the unique energy solution with exterior datum supported in $W_1$. The key identity is the heat-semigroup representation $(-\Delta_g)^\alpha = \frac{1}{\Gamma(-\alpha)}\int_0^\infty (e^{t\Delta_g}-1)\,t^{-1-\alpha}\,dt$, combined with a unique-continuation argument that upgrades equality on $W_2$ to equality of the heat kernels on the entire exterior. The second proof replaces this representation with a mixed Dirichlet–Neumann problem in one extra dimension whose trace is the fractional Laplacian, and uses transmission-condition regularity estimates for those solutions to replace the unique-continuation step.

What would settle it

Search for two smooth complete Riemannian metrics on a connected manifold and an open set $O$ such that $e^{t\Delta_{g_1}}(x,y)=e^{t\Delta_{g_2}}(x,y)$ for all $t>0$ and $x,y\in O$ but no diffeomorphism fixing $O$ maps $g_1$ to $g_2$; such a pair would disprove the imported Theorem 3.5 and, with it, the exterior-fixing conclusion of Theorem 1.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper proves Theorem 1.1: for $n\ge 2$, smooth metrics $g_1,g_2$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$ that agree with the Euclidean metric outside a compact set and agree on the exterior $\Omega^e$ are forced to satisfy $g_1=\Phi^*g_2$ on all of $\mathbb{R}^n$ for some $C^\infty$ diffeomorphism $\Phi$ with $\Phi(x)=x$ for $x\in\Omega^e$, whenever the partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps $\Lambda_{g_1}^{W_1,W_2}$ and $\Lambda_{g_2}^{W_1,W_2}$ coincide on any nonempty open sets $W_1,W_2\subset\Omega^e$. The proof first converts the partial exterior data into equality of heat kernels $e^{t\Delta_{g_1}}(x,y)=e^{t\Delta_{g_2}}(x,y)$ for all $t>0$, $x,y\in\Omega^e$, and then invokes an imported theorem, stated as Theorem 3.5, that heat-kernel equality on an open set of complete manifolds implies such an exterior-fixing isometry. A second proof reaches the same heat-kernel conclusion through the elliptic extension formulation of the fractional Laplacian.

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on an imported theorem, stated as Theorem 3.5 and refined in Remark 3.6, that equality of heat kernels on an open exterior set already forces a diffeomorphism fixing that set; the exterior-fixing refinement is attributed to a private communication and is not proved in this paper, so if that modification fails the conclusion weakens to recovery up to a diffeomorphism that may move the exterior.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann data on any nonempty open sets $W_1,W_2$ determine the full Riemannian metric up to the diffeomorphism gauge fixing the exterior, so small observation windows suffice.
  • If two metrics in the same conformal class produce equal partial exterior data, the conformal factor must be identically $1$.
  • Equality of heat kernels on the exterior becomes a full recovery statement: exterior measurements determine the interior geometry completely.
  • Both the pseudodifferential route and the elliptic-extension route yield the same theorem, so the extension formulation can serve as a primary analytic tool in related fractional inverse problems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper conjectures in Remark 1.3 an equivalence between partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann data and exterior source-to-solution data; if that equivalence is established, uniqueness would follow from either type of measurement, and one could test numerically whether the two data sets are interconvertible.
  • The elliptic-extension proof notes that only $C^{k,\epsilon}$ metric regularity and $C^{1,\epsilon}$ domains would be needed; this suggests the same uniqueness should hold with lower regularity, an extension beyond the smooth statement that could be tested directly.
  • Because the theorem holds for every $\alpha\in(0,1)$, one could probe the limit cases $\alpha\to0$ and $\alpha\to1$; the behavior of the uniqueness statement under these limits is not treated here and could be studied numerically or analytically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the fractional anisotropic Calderón problem with exterior data on R^n, n ≥ 2, for smooth Riemannian metrics that agree with the Euclidean metric outside a compact set. The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that the partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann map Λ_g^{W_1,W_2}, measured on arbitrary nonempty open sets W_1,W_2 in the exterior Ω^e, determines the metric up to a C^∞ diffeomorphism fixing Ω^e, under the a priori assumption that the two metrics agree on Ω^e. Two proofs are offered. The first uses the heat semigroup representation of the fractional Laplace–Beltrami operator, a pseudodifferential analysis of (−Δ_g)^α, and a boundary-control reduction to equality of heat kernels. The second uses a variable-coefficient Caffarelli–Silvestre-type extension, Vishik–Eskin regularity estimates, and a source-to-solution recovery of the heat kernel. The paper also contains a detailed appendix proving that (−Δ_g)^α is a classical elliptic pseudodifferential operator on R^n, and an appendix with regularity estimates for the mixed Dirichlet–Neumann extension problem.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it resolves a notable open problem: the fractional anisotropic Calderón problem with exterior data in the noncompact Euclidean setting, with the expected diffeomorphism gauge that fixes the exterior. The paper is unusually detailed: it gives two independent proof strategies, a complete proof of the pseudodifferential nature of the fractional Laplace–Beltrami operator, explicit heat-kernel estimates, and a full treatment of the reduction from partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann data to equality of heat kernels in the exterior. The authors are explicit about the two possible routes (heat semigroup and degenerate elliptic extension), and Appendix B is a genuine contribution that may be of independent interest. The main caveat is that the final exterior-fixing step of the uniqueness argument is imported from a private communication without proof; this is load-bearing for the statement of Theorem 1.1. With that gap closed, the paper would be a significant advance in the fractional Calderón theory.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.5 / Remark 3.6] The exterior-fixing conclusion Φ(x)=x for x∈Ω^e is load-bearing for Theorem 1.1, but it is not proved in the manuscript. Theorem 3.5 is quoted from [41, Theorem 1.5], and Remark 3.6 admits that [41, Theorem 1.5] did not contain the pointwise fixing claim and that it follows only from a 'small modification' of [59, Theorem 2] communicated privately by T. Saksala. No statement of the modified theorem, no proof, and no public reference are given. Because the gauge obstruction is exactly diffeomorphisms that may move points in Ω^e while preserving the equality g_1=g_2 there, the current text does not establish Theorem 1.1 as stated. This issue affects both proofs, since Section 3.5 and the conclusion of Section 4.2.3 both invoke Theorem 3.5. Please add a complete proof, or a precise statement with a citable public source, of the exterior-fixing version of the heat-kernel rigidity result.
  2. [Section 3.4 / Lemma 3.4] The key new implication L_{g_1}^{Ω^e,Ω^e}=L_{g_2}^{Ω^e,Ω^e} ⇒ e^{tΔ_{g_1}}(x,y)=e^{tΔ_{g_2}}(x,y) for all x,y∈Ω^e is not actually proved. After equations (3.54)–(3.55), the text says 'Following the argument in the proof of Lemma 3.1 (see also [41]), we complete the proof.' The step from the integrated moment identities to pointwise equality of heat kernels requires a Mellin-inversion argument and a passage from identities tested against smooth compactly supported F to pointwise identities away from the diagonal; this is the central new reduction of the heat-semigroup proof. Please expand the argument, or give an explicit reduction to a stated lemma with all hypotheses verified.
  3. [Section 4.2.3 / Proposition 4.25] The final paragraph of Proposition 4.25 repeats the same omission in the second proof: after deriving the moment equalities, it concludes with 'Relying on an argument as in (3.33) and following, this then implies...' that the heat kernels agree pointwise. Since this is the concluding step of the second proof of Theorem 1.1, the moment-to-pointwise step should either be proved directly or explicitly reduced to a fully stated and proved lemma, for example to a completed version of Lemma 3.4.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] In the first paragraph of the introduction, the sentence 'Then the n( Rn,g ) is a complete Riemannian manifold' appears to contain a typo ('the n'); it should probably read 'Then (R^n,g) is a complete Riemannian manifold.'
  2. [Section 3.1, proof of Lemma 3.1, Case I] In the final display of Case I, the unique continuation conclusion is written as 'U^{(1)}(t,x)=U^{(2)}(t,x)=0'; the right-hand side should be 'U^{(1)}(t,x)=U^{(2)}(t,x)', since the two heat evolutions are being shown equal, not zero.
  3. [Section 4.1.4 / Remark 4.16] The justification of the convergence in (4.22) is very compressed: it cites continuity of the operators involved, but the H^{-α} continuity estimate from (4.10) applies to the generalized Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps, not directly to the normal derivative. A short indication of the approximation argument would improve readability.
  4. [Throughout] The paper repeatedly says 'following the argument' or 'see also [41]' at crucial transition points. Given the length of the paper, it would be preferable to state the exact lemma being used, especially in Lemma 3.4, Proposition 4.25, and the reduction from heat-kernel equality to the metric in Section 3.5.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Exterior-fixing diffeomorphism conclusion rests on an unproved 'small modification' of a prior same-author uniqueness theorem (Remark 3.6).

  1. uniqueness imported from authors [Section 3.5, Theorem 3.5 and Remark 3.6; reused in the conclusion of Section 4.2.3]
    "Having Lemma 3.4 at hand, Theorem 1.1 follows by applying the following result ... This result was established in [41, Theorem 1.5], as a consequence of [59, Theorem 2]. ... Remark 3.6. In [41, Theorem 1.5], there was no claim that Φ(x) = x for all x ∈ O. However, this claim follows from a small modification of the proof of [59, Theorem 2], which was used in the proof of [41, Theorem 1.5]. This was explained to us by Teemu Saksala."

    The final step of the proof converts exterior heat-kernel equality into the exact conclusion of Theorem 1.1, including the crucial exterior-fixing property Φ(x)=x on Ωe. The paper attributes this step to [41, Theorem 1.5], which shares four of the six present authors, but Remark 3.6 then concedes that [41] contained no such exterior-fixing claim. The missing property is instead asserted to follow from a 'small modification' of [59, Theorem 2], communicated privately by Teemu Saksala, with no proof and no precise statement of the modified theorem. Thus the load-bearing uniqueness statement is imported from the authors' prior work and then extended by an unverified private communication.

full rationale

The bulk of the paper is genuine, self-contained mathematics: Lemmas 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 (and the Section 4 analogues, Lemmas 4.19, 4.22 and Propositions 4.24, 4.25) reduce partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann data to exterior heat-kernel equality, using Vishik-Eskin estimates, a full pseudodifferential proof of the fractional Laplace-Beltrami symbol (Appendix B), and a degenerate elliptic extension perspective. These reductions do not presuppose the conclusion; they are independent derivations. The circularity burden is concentrated in the last step: Theorem 1.1's conclusion that the diffeomorphism fixes Ωe enters only through Theorem 3.5, which the paper says was established in [41]. Remark 3.6 explicitly admits that [41] lacked this exterior-fixing claim and replaces it with a 'small modification' of [59, Theorem 2], communicated privately by T. Saksala with no proof. Because [41] is authored by four of the present authors, the decisive uniqueness theorem is a same-author import, supplemented by an unverified modification. The paper would still have substantial independent content even if this step were repaired, so a moderate score rather than a maximal one is appropriate. The compressed 'following the argument' references in Lemma 3.4 and Proposition 4.25 are citations to proof templates and are not themselves circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear; the paper is a deterministic uniqueness proof. The main external inputs are standard pseudodifferential, spectral, and boundary-control theorems, plus the assumed exterior agreement of the two metrics.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Functional calculus for self-adjoint operators, used to define (-Delta_g)^alpha and the heat semigroup representation (2.11).
    Section 2.1 and Proposition 2.7 rely on the spectral theorem; this is unobjectionable background.
  • standard math Pseudodifferential calculus in the class Psi^m_{1,0}, including the result that (-Delta_g)^alpha is classical elliptic with principal symbol (sum g^{jk} xi_j xi_k)^alpha.
    Theorem 2.1 and Appendix B; a proof is provided in the paper.
  • standard math Vishik-Eskin and mu-transmission theory for elliptic pseudodifferential operators, as developed by Hormander, Eskin, and Grubb.
    Used to prove Corollary 2.17 and Lemma 4.20; imported from the cited literature.
  • standard math Boundary control method: Theorem 3.5 from prior work, with the exterior-fixing modification from a theorem by Helin, Lassas, Oksanen, and Saksala, communicated privately.
    Final step of both proofs; the modification is not proved in the paper, as stated in Remark 3.6.
  • standard math Heat kernel estimates: two-sided Gaussian bounds (2.12), derivative bounds (2.13), and stochastic completeness (2.14).
    Used throughout Sections 2 and 3; cited from standard references.
  • domain assumption Metrics g1 and g2 are C^infty, agree with the Euclidean metric outside a compact set, and satisfy g1=g2 on Omega^e.
    Statement of Theorem 1.1; without it the exterior measurements would not constrain the exterior metric.
  • domain assumption Omega is bounded with C^infty boundary, Omega^e is connected, and W1 and W2 are open nonempty subsets of Omega^e.
    Needed for the heat-equation unique continuation in Lemma 3.1 and for the boundary control step.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractional anisotropic Calder\'on problem with external data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XW3LMVZG

@misc{pith2026250200710,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractional anisotropic Calder\'on problem with external data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XW3LMVZG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00710}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we solve the fractional anisotropic Calder\'on problem with external data in the Euclidean space, in dimensions two and higher, for smooth Riemannian metrics that agree with the Euclidean metric outside a compact set. Specifically, we prove that the knowledge of the partial exterior Dirichlet--to--Neumann map for the fractional Laplace-Beltrami operator, given on arbitrary open nonempty sets in the exterior of the domain in the Euclidean space, determines the Riemannian metric up to diffeomorphism, fixing the exterior. We provide two proofs of this result: one relies on the heat semigroup representation of the fractional Laplacian and a pseudodifferential approach, while the other is based on a variable-coefficient elliptic extension interpretation of the fractional Laplacian.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anisotropic Calder\'{o}n problem of a nearly Laplace-Beltrami operator of order $2+$

    math.AP 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper claims an anisotropic Calderon uniqueness theorem for a logarithmic Laplacian of order 2+, but the central Paley-Wiener argument is invalid.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [59]

    Helin, T., Lassas, M., Oksanen, L., Saksala, T., Correlation based passive imaging with a white noise source , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 116 (2018), 132–160

    2018

  2. [41]

    Differential Geom., to appear

    Feizmohammadi, A., Ghosh, T., Krupchyk, K., Uhlmann, G ., Fractional anisotropic Calder´ on problem on closed Riemannian manifolds , J. Differential Geom., to appear

    work page

  3. [1]

    Springer, Cham, 2015

    Agranovich, M., Sobolev spaces, their generalizations and elliptic proble ms in smooth and Lipschitz domains , Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2015

    2015

  4. [2]

    Partial Differential Equations 29 (2004), no.5–6, 671–705

    Ammann, B., Lauter, R., Nistor, V., Vasy, A., Complex powers and non-compact manifolds , Comm. Partial Differential Equations 29 (2004), no.5–6, 671–705

    2004

  5. [3]

    F., W arma, M., Fractional powers of sectorial operators via the Dirichlet -to- Neumann operator, Comm

    Arendt, W., Ter Elst, A. F., W arma, M., Fractional powers of sectorial operators via the Dirichlet -to- Neumann operator, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 43 (2018), no. 1, 1–24

    2018

  6. [4]

    Aronson, D., Bounds for the fundamental solution of a parabolic equation , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 890–896

    1967

  7. [5]

    Banica, V., del Mar Gonz´ alez, M., S´ aez, M.,Some constructions for the fractional Laplacian on noncomp act manifolds, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 31 (2015), no. 2, 681–712

    2015

  8. [6]

    Baers, H., Covi, G., R¨ uland, A., On instability properties of the fractional Calder´ on prob lem, preprint 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08381

    arXiv 2024

Show all 105 references
  1. [7]

    AN SSSR 297 (1987) 524–527 (in Russian)

    Belishev, M., An approach to multidimensional inverse problems for the wa ve equation, Dokl. AN SSSR 297 (1987) 524–527 (in Russian)

    1987

  2. [8]

    Partial Differential Equations, 17 (1992), 767–804

    Belishev, M., Kurylev Y., To the reconstruction of a Riemannian manifold via its spect ral data (BC-method) , Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 17 (1992), 767–804

    1992

  3. [9]

    Bhattacharyya, S., Ghosh, T., Uhlmann, G., Inverse problems for the fractional-Laplacian with lower o rder non-local perturbations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 374 (2021), no. 5, 3053–3075

    2021

  4. [10]

    Nonlinear Stud

    Biccari, U., W arma, M., Zuazua, E., Local elliptic regularity for the Dirichlet fractional Lap lacian, Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 17 (2017), no. 2, 387–409

    2017

  5. [11]

    Brasco, L., G´ omez-Castro, D., V´ azquez, J.,Characterisation of homogeneous fractional Sobolev space s, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 60 (2021), no. 2, Paper No. 60, 40 pp

    2021

  6. [12]

    Brezis, H., Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differenti al equations , Springer, New York, 2011

    2011

  7. [13]

    Br¨ andle, C., Colorado, E., de Pablo, A., S´ anchez, U., A concave-convex elliptic problem involving the frac- tional Laplacian , Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 143 (2013), no. 1, 39–71

    2013

  8. [14]

    Partial Differ- ential Equations 32 (2007), no

    Caffarelli, L., Silvestre, L., An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian , Comm. Partial Differ- ential Equations 32 (2007), no. 7-9, 1245–1260

    2007

  9. [15]

    Caffarelli, L., Stinga, P., Fractional elliptic equations, Caccioppoli estimates and regularity, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire33 (2016), no. 3, 767–807

    2016

  10. [16]

    65–73, Soc

    Calder´ on, A., On an inverse boundary value problem , Seminar on Numerical Analysis and its Applications to Continuum Physics (Rio de Janeiro, 1980), pp. 65–73, Soc. Brasil. Mat., Rio de Janeiro, 1980

    1980

  11. [17]

    Ceki´ c, M., Lin, Y.-H., R¨ uland, A.,The Calder´ on problem for the fractional Schr¨ odinger equation with drift , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59 (2020), no. 3, Paper No. 91

    2020

  12. [18]

    A., del Mar Gonz´ alez, M., Fractional Laplacian in conformal geometry , Advances in Mathe- matics, Volume 226, Issue 2, 2011, pp

    Chang, S.-Y. A., del Mar Gonz´ alez, M., Fractional Laplacian in conformal geometry , Advances in Mathe- matics, Volume 226, Issue 2, 2011, pp. 1410-1432

    2011

  13. [19]

    Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1984

    Chavel, I., Eigenvalues in Riemannian geometry , Pure and Applied Mathematics, 115. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1984

    1984

  14. [20]

    K., An inverse problem for fractional connection Laplacians , J

    Chien, C. K., An inverse problem for fractional connection Laplacians , J. Geom. Anal. 33 (2023), no. 12, Paper No. 375, 23 pp. 68 FEIZMOHAMMADI, GHOSH, KRUPCHYK, R ¨ULAND, SJ ¨OSTRAND, AND UHLMANN

    2023

  15. [21]

    Choulli, M., Ouhabaz, E., Fractional anisotropic Calder´ on problem on complete Riem annian manifolds , Communications in Contemporary Mathematics, to appear

  16. [22]

    193 (2020), 111418

    Covi, G., Inverse problems for a fractional conductivity equation , Nonlinear Anal. 193 (2020), 111418

    2020

  17. [23]

    4, 045004

    Covi, G., An inverse problem for the fractional Schr¨ odinger equatio n in a magnetic field , Inverse Problems 36 (2020), no. 4, 045004

    2020

  18. [24]

    Covi, G., Uniqueness for the fractional Calder´ on problem with quasilocal perturbations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 54 (2022), no. 6, 6136–6163

    2022

  19. [25]

    Covi, G., de Hoop, M., Salo, M., Geometrical optics for the fractional Helmholtz equation a nd applications to inverse problems , preprint 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14698v1

    2024 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Differential Equations 341 (2022), 79–149

    Covi, G., Garcia-Ferrero, M., R¨ uland, A., On the Calder´ on problem for nonlocal Schr¨ odinger equations with homogeneous, directionally antilocal principal symbols , J. Differential Equations 341 (2022), 79–149

    2022

  21. [27]

    Covi, G., Ghosh, T., R¨ uland, A., Uhlmann, G., A reduction of the fractional Calder´ on prob- lem to the local Calder´ on problem by means of the Caffarelli– Silvestre extension , preprint 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04227

    2023 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Covi, G., M¨ onkk¨ onen, K., Railo, J., Uhlmann, G., The higher order fractional Calder´ on problem for linear local operators: uniqueness , Adv. Math. 399 (2022), Paper No. 108246, 29 pp

    2022

  23. [29]

    Covi, G., Railo, J., Tyni, T., Zimmermann, P., Stability estimates for the inverse fractional conductivi ty problem, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 56 (2024), no. 2, 2456–2487

    2024

  24. [30]

    Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht , 2001

    Craioveanu, M., Puta, M., Rassias, T., Old and new aspects in spectral geometry , Mathematics and its Applications, 534. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht , 2001

    2001

  25. [31]

    B., Heat kernels and spectral theory , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 92

    Davies, E. B., Heat kernels and spectral theory , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 92. Cambridge Universit y Press, Cambridge, 1989

    1989

  26. [32]

    Di Nezza, E., Palatucci, G., Valdinoci, E., Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces , Bull. Sci. Math. 136 (2012), no. 5, 521–573

    2012

  27. [33]

    Cambridge University Press, Camb ridge, 1999

    Dimassi, M., Sj¨ ostrand, J., Spectral asymptotics in the semi-classical limit , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 268. Cambridge University Press, Camb ridge, 1999

    1999

  28. [34]

    Dos Santos Ferreira, D., Kenig, C., Salo, M., Uhlmann, G ., Limiting Carleman weights and anisotropic inverse problems , Invent. Math. 178 (2009), no. 1, 119–171

    2009

  29. [35]

    Dos Santos Ferreira, D., Kurylev, Y., Lassas, M., Salo, M., The Calder´ on problem in transversally anisotropic geometries, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 18 (2016), no. 11, 2579–2626

    2016

  30. [36]

    Eskin, G., Boundary value problems for elliptic pseudodifferential eq uations, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1981

    1981

  31. [37]

    American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011

    Eskin, G., Lectures on linear partial differential equations , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 123. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011

    2011

  32. [38]

    Fall, M., Felli, V., Unique continuation properties for relativistic Schr¨ odi nger operators with a singular potential, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35 (2015), no. 12, 5827–5867

    2015

  33. [39]

    Partial Differential Equations 39 (2014), no

    Fall, M., Felli, V., Unique continuation property and local asymptotics of solu tions to fractional elliptic equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 39 (2014), no. 2, 354–397

    2014

  34. [40]

    Feizmohammadi, A., Fractional Calder´ on problem on a closed Riemannian manifo ld, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 377 (2024), no. 4, 2991–3013

    2024

  35. [42]

    Feizmohammadi, A., Krupchyk, K., Uhlmann, G., Calder´ on problem for fractional Schr¨ odinger operators on closed Riemannian manifolds , preprint 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16866

    2024 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Feizmohammadi, A., Lin, Y.-H., Entanglement principle for the fractional Laplacian with a pplications to inverse problems , preprint 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13118v1

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Felsinger, M., Kassmann, M., Voigt, P., The Dirichlet problem for nonlocal operators , Math. Z. 279 (2015), no. 3-4, 779–809

    2015

  38. [45]

    Partial Differential Equations 42 (2017), no

    Ghosh, T., Lin, Y.-H., Xiao, J., The Calder´ on problem for variable coefficients nonlocal ell iptic operators , Comm. Partial Differential Equations 42 (2017), no. 12, 1923–1961

    2017

  39. [46]

    Ghosh, T., R¨ uland, A., Salo, M., Uhlmann, G., Uniqueness and reconstruction for the fractional Calder´ o n problem with a single measurement , J. Funct. Anal. 279 (2020), no. 1, 108505

    2020

  40. [47]

    PDE 13 (2020), no

    Ghosh, T., Salo, M., Uhlmann, G., The Calder´ on problem for the fractional Schr¨ odinger equa tion, Anal. PDE 13 (2020), no. 2, 455–475

    2020

  41. [48]

    Ghosh, T., Uhlmann, G., The Calder´ on problem for nonlocal operators , preprint, https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.09265

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    An introdu ction., Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 1994

    Grigis, A., Sj¨ ostrand, J., Microlocal analysis for differential operators. An introdu ction., Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 1994. FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPIC CALDER ´ON PROBLEM WITH EXTERNAL DATA 69

    1994

  43. [50]

    Uniform bounds for eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on manif olds with boundary, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 27 (7-8) (2002), 1283–1299

    Grieser, D. Uniform bounds for eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on manif olds with boundary, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 27 (7-8) (2002), 1283–1299

    2002

  44. [51]

    Grigor’yan, A., Heat kernel and analysis on manifolds , American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; International Press, Boston, MA, 2009

    2009

  45. [52]

    Grubb, G., Distributions and operators , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2009

    2009

  46. [53]

    PDE 7 (2014), no.7, 1649–1682

    Grubb, G., Local and nonlocal boundary conditions for µ -transmission and fractional elliptic pseudodiffer- ential operators, Anal. PDE 7 (2014), no.7, 1649–1682

    2014

  47. [54]

    Grubb, G., Fractional Laplacians on domains, a development of H¨ orman der’s theory of µ –transmission pseudodifferential operators , Adv. Math. 268 (2015), 478–528

    2015

  48. [55]

    Grubb, G., Exact Green ’s formula for the fractional Laplacian and pert urbations, Math. Scand. 126 (2020), no. 3, 568–592

    2020

  49. [56]

    PDE 13 (2020), no

    Guillarmou, C., Hassell, A., Krupchyk, K., Eigenvalue bounds for non-self-adjoint Schr¨ odinger oper ators with non-trapping metrics , Anal. PDE 13 (2020), no. 6, 1633–1670

    2020

  50. [57]

    Harrach, B., Lin, Y.-H., W eth, T., The Calder´ on problem for the logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equation, preprint 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17775

    2024 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Hassell, A., Tao, T., W unsch, J., Sharp Strichartz estimates on nontrapping asymptotically conic manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 128 (2006), no. 4, 963–1024

    2006

  52. [60]

    H¨ ormander, L., Seminar notes on pseudo-differential operators and bound- ary problems , lectures at IAS Princeton 1965–66, Lund University Public ations, https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/ws/files/42232915/Lars_Hormander_Seminar_Notes_IAS_1965_66.pdf, 1966

    1965

  53. [61]

    P seudo-differential operators, Reprint of the 1994 edition

    H¨ ormander, L.,The analysis of linear partial differential operators III. P seudo-differential operators, Reprint of the 1994 edition. Classics in Mathematics. Springer, Ber lin, 2007

    1994

  54. [62]

    Jin, T., Li, Y., Xiong, J., On a fractional Nirenberg problem, part I: blow up analysis a nd compactness of solutions, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 16 (2014), no. 6, 1111–1171

    2014

  55. [63]

    Kienzler, C., Flat fronts and stability for the porous medium equation , PhD thesis, University of Bonn, 2014

    2014

  56. [64]

    Kassmann, M., Madych, W., Difference quotients and elliptic mixed boundary value prob lems of second order, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 56 (2007), no. 3, 1047–1082

    2007

  57. [65]

    Kenig, C., Pilod, D., Ponce, G., Vega, L., On the fractional Sch¨ odinger equation with variable coeffic ients, preprint 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01300

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    SIAM-AMS Symp

    Kohn, R., Vogelius, M., Identification of an unknown conductivity by means of measur ements at the boundary , Proc. SIAM-AMS Symp. on Inverse Problems, New York, 1983

    1983

  59. [67]

    Differential Equations 343 (2023), 64–89

    Lai, R.-Y., Zhou, T., An inverse problem for the non-linear fractional magnetic S chr¨ odinger equation, J. Differential Equations 343 (2023), 64–89

    2023

  60. [68]

    Lassas, M., Taylor, M., Uhlmann, G., The Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for complete Riemannian mani folds with boundary , Comm. Anal. Geom. 11 (2003), no. 2, 207–221

    2003

  61. [69]

    Lassas, M., Uhlmann, G., On determining a Riemannian manifold from the Dirichlet-to -Neumann map , Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 34 (2001), no. 5, 771–787

    2001

  62. [70]

    Pure Appl

    Lee, J., Uhlmann, G., Determining anisotropic real-analytic conductivities by boundary measurements , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 42 (1989), no. 8, 1097–1112

    1989

  63. [71]

    Peral, I., Primo, A., Soria, F., Basic estimates for solutions of a class of nonlocal ellipti c and parabolic equations, Discrete Contin

    Leonori, T. Peral, I., Primo, A., Soria, F., Basic estimates for solutions of a class of nonlocal ellipti c and parabolic equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35 (2015), no. 12, 6031–6068

    2015

  64. [72]

    Lerner, N., A course on integration theory , Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Basel, 2014

    2014

  65. [73]

    7, 075003

    Li, L., The Calder´ on problem for the fractional magnetic operator, Inverse Problems 36 (2020), no. 7, 075003

    2020

  66. [74]

    Partial Differential Equations 46 (2021), no

    Li, L., Determining the magnetic potential in the fractional magne tic Calder´ on problem, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 46 (2021), no. 6, 1017–1026

    2021

  67. [75]

    Lin, C.-L., Lin, Y.-H., Uhlmann, G., The Calder´ on problem for nonlocal parabolic operators: A new reduction from the nonlocal to the local , preprint 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.09654

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Pure Appl

    Lin, F.-H., A uniqueness theorem for parabolic equations , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 43 (1990), no. 1, 127–136

    1990

  69. [77]

    Lin, Y.-H., Zimmermann, P., Approximation and uniqueness results for the nonlocal diffu se optical tomog- raphy problem, preprint 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06226

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    1, 125–134

    Lionheart, W., Conformal uniqueness results in anisotropic electrical im pedance imaging, Inverse Problems 13 (1997), no. 1, 125–134

    1997

  71. [79]

    Second, revised and augmented edition

    Maz’ya, V., Sobolev spaces with applications to elliptic partial differ ential equations . Second, revised and augmented edition. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissen schaften, 342. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    2011

  72. [80]

    70 FEIZMOHAMMADI, GHOSH, KRUPCHYK, R ¨ULAND, SJ ¨OSTRAND, AND UHLMANN

    McLean, W., Strongly elliptic systems and boundary integral equations , Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2000. 70 FEIZMOHAMMADI, GHOSH, KRUPCHYK, R ¨ULAND, SJ ¨OSTRAND, AND UHLMANN

    2000

  73. [81]

    of Math., 143 (1996), 71–96

    Nachman, A., Global uniqueness for a two-dimensional inverse boundary v alue problem, Ann. of Math., 143 (1996), 71–96

    1996

  74. [82]

    Nekvinda, A., Characterization of traces of the weighted Sobolev space W 1,p(Ω , d ǫ M ) on M , Czechoslovak Math. J. 43 (118) (1993), no. 4, 695–711

    1993

  75. [83]

    Olver, F. W. J., Olde Daalhuis, A. B., Lozier, D. W., Schn eider, B. I., Boisvert, R. F., Clark, C. W., Miller, B. R., Saunders, B. V., Cohl, H. S., and McClain, M. A., eds. NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.2 of 2024-09-15

    2024

  76. [84]

    Nauk 39 (1984), no

    Porper, F., Eidel’man, S., Two-sided estimates of the fundamental solutions of second -order parabolic equa- tions and some applications of them , (Russian) Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 39 (1984), no. 3 (237), 107–156

    1984

  77. [85]

    Quan, H., Uhlmann, G., The Calder´ on problem for the fractional Dirac operator, Math. Res. Lett. 31 (2024), no. 1, 279–302

    2024

  78. [86]

    Railo, J., Zimmermann, P., Fractional Calder´ on problems and Poincar´ e inequalitieson unbounded domains , J. Spectr. Theory 13 (2023), no. 1, 63–131

    2023

  79. [87]

    239 (2024), Paper No

    Railo, J., Zimmermann, P., Low regularity theory for the inverse fractional conductiv ity problem , Nonlinear Anal. 239 (2024), Paper No. 113418, 27 pp

    2024

  80. [88]

    Roidos, N., Shao, Y., Functional inequalities involving nonlocal operators on c omplete Riemannian manifolds and their applications to the fractional porous medium equa tion, Evolution Equations & Control Theory, Evol. Equ. Control Theory 11 (2022), no. 3, 793–825

    2022

  81. [89]

    Ros-Oton, X., Nonlocal elliptic equations in bounded domains: a survey , Publ. Mat. 60 (2016), no. 1, 3–26

    2016

  82. [90]

    Partial Differential Equations 40 (2015), no

    R¨ uland, A., Unique continuation for fractional Schr¨ odinger equations with rough potentials , Comm. Partial Differential Equations 40 (2015), no. 1, 77–114

    2015

  83. [91]

    R¨ uland, A., On single measurement stability for the fractional Calder´ on problem , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 53 (2021), no. 5, 5094–5113

    2021

  84. [92]

    R¨ uland, A., Revisiting the Anisotropic fractional Calder´ on problem u sing the Caffarelli-Silvestre extension , preprint 2023, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.00858

    2023 arXiv

  85. [93]

    4, 045003

    R¨ uland, A., Salo, M., Exponential instability in the fractional Calder´ on problem, Inverse Problems 34 (2018), no. 4, 045003

    2018

  86. [94]

    193 (2020), 111529

    R¨ uland, A., Salo, M., The fractional Calder´ on problem: low regularity and stabi lity, Nonlinear Anal. 193 (2020), 111529

    2020

  87. [95]

    I, 299–343, Int

    Saloff-Coste, L., Sobolev inequalities in familiar and unfamiliar settings , Sobolev spaces in mathematics. I, 299–343, Int. Math. Ser. (N. Y.), 8, Springer, New York, 2009

    2009

  88. [96]

    Savar´ e, G.,Regularity results for elliptic equations in Lipschitz dom ains, J. Funct. Anal. 152 (1998), no. 1, 176–201

    1998

  89. [97]

    Seeley, R., Complex powers of an elliptic operator. , Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Amer. Math. Soc., 1997, 288–307

    1997

  90. [98]

    Andersson

    Shubin, M., Pseudodifferential operators and spectral theory , Translated from the 1978 Russian original by Stig I. Andersson. Second edition. Springer-Verlag, Berli n, 2001

    1978

  91. [99]

    Sj¨ ostrand, J.,A trace formula and review of some estimates for resonances , Microlocal analysis and spectral theory, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C: Math. Phys. Sci., 490, Kl uwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1997, 377–437

    1997

  92. [100]

    Partial Differential Equations 35 (2010), no

    Stinga, P., Torrea, J., Extension problem and Harnack’s inequality for some fracti onal operators, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 35 (2010), no. 11, 2092–2122

    2010

  93. [101]

    Functional Analysis 52 (1983), no

    Strichartz, R., Analysis of the Laplacian on the complete Riemannian manifo ld, J. Functional Analysis 52 (1983), no. 1, 48–79

    1983

  94. [102]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1981

    Taylor, M., Pseudodifferential operators , Princeton Mathematical Series, 34. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1981

    1981

  95. [103]

    Uhlmann, G., Inverse problems: seeing the unseen , Bull. Math. Sci. 4 (2014), no. 2, 209–279

    2014

  96. [104]

    Nauk 20 (1965), 89–152; English translation in: Russian Math

    Vishik, M., Eskin, G., Convolution equations in a bounded region , Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 20 (1965), 89–152; English translation in: Russian Math. Surveys 20 (1965) 86–151

    1965

  97. [105]

    PDE 3 (2017), no

    Yu, H., Unique continuation for fractional orders of elliptic equa tions, Ann. PDE 3 (2017), no. 2, Paper No. 16, 21 pp. FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPIC CALDER ´ON PROBLEM WITH EXTERNAL DATA 71 A. Feizmohammadi, Department of Mathematics, University of T oronto, Road Deerfield Hall, 30...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.