Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 59 references

Regularity of cylindrical singular sets of mean curvature flow

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cylindrical singular sets of mean curvature flow are locally C^{2,α} after removing a lower-dimensional subset, and their curvature is determined by the leading eigenfunction of the linearized flow.

desk verdict Strong step on degenerate cylindrical singular sets, but the uniform Whitney estimates ride on an unstated quantitative uniqueness result from a preprint; referee should verify that before accepting. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01707 v1 pith:XWCGW63L submitted 2025-09-01 math.DG math.AP

Ao Sun , Zhihan Wang , Jinxin Xue This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AP MSC 53C4435B6535K55
keywords meancurvatureflowcylindricalsingularsetC^{2α}regularitytangentrescaledJacobioperatorL²non-concentrationWhitneyextensiontheorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the set of points where a mean curvature flow collapses like a round cylinder R^k × S^{n−k}. It proves that after discarding a lower-dimensional subset S_k^0, the remaining degenerate k-cylindrical singular set S_k^+ is locally contained in a k-dimensional C^{2,α}-submanifold; when S_k^+ is itself a submanifold, its curvature is explicitly determined by the leading eigenfunction of the linearized flow. A key consequence is that singular sets, which satisfy no PDE by themselves, inherit a smooth structure from the local dynamics of the singularity. The proof yields a trichotomy for the asymptotic profile near each cylindrical singularity and a precise location estimate that forces nearby singularities to lie on a single surface.

What carries the argument

The engine is a relative L²-distance non-concentration estimate: the weighted Gaussian L² distance from the rescaled flow to a low spherical flow cannot concentrate near the cylinder, yielding a discrete monotonicity of the decay order N_u(τ,M) = log(d_u(τ,M(τ))/d_u(τ+1,M(τ+1))). This forces the decay order to converge to an eigenvalue of the Jacobi operator −L_{n,k} = −Δ_{C_{n,k}} + (1/2)⟨y,∇_y⟩ − 1, after quotienting out the slow spherical eigenmodes that do not affect the geometry of the singular set. The resulting asymptotic-profile trichotomy is converted, through translation, dilation, and rotation unwinding, into a location estimate comparing the spines and curvature forms at two near

What would settle it

Take a mean curvature flow with two degenerate k-cylindrical singularities approaching a known one, rescale so their parabolic distance is r, and measure the angle between their spines and the quadratic form q. If the quantities r⁻²|Δt|, r⁻¹|Δx − q(Δy)|, ‖ℓ − ∇q(Δy)‖, and r‖Q₂ − Q₁‖ exceed C r^{2γ⁺_{n,k}−10ε} for a sequence r → 0, the Whitney data are incompatible and the C^{2,α} conclusion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for each 1 ≤ k ≤ n−1, the k-cylindrical singular set S_k(M) splits as S_k^0 ∪ S_k^+, where S_k^0 has parabolic Hausdorff dimension at most k−1 (and is isolated when k=1), S_k^+ is relatively closed in S_k(M), and for every α < min{1, 2/(n−k)}, each point of S_k^+ has a neighborhood in which S_k^+ lies inside a k-dimensional C^{2,α}-submanifold. The theorem also bounds the time-image of S_k^+ and, when S_k^+ is a submanifold, identifies its second fundamental form: it is twice the quadratic coefficient appearing in the leading eigenfunction ψ ∈ W_{1/2} of the Jacobi operator, via ψ(θ,y) = ⟨q(y) − 2 tr q, θ/|θ|⟩ plus cubic terms. Thus the curvature of the sing

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that two nearby degenerate cylindrical singularities have tangent-flow spines that stay uniformly close to each other over a time interval that does not shrink to zero; if that quantitative comparison fails, the location estimate and the C^{2,α} conclusion do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The degenerate k-cylindrical singular set, despite being defined by a nonlocal collapse condition and satisfying no PDE, is locally trapped in a smooth surface of dimension k, so counting or integrating over it is justified.
  • When the singular set is already known to be a k-dimensional submanifold, its curvature is not free: it equals 2A_i determined by the ψ ∈ W_{1/2} eigenmode, and vanishing of those coefficients forces the second fundamental form to vanish.
  • In R³ for mean-convex or genus-zero starting surfaces, and in higher dimensions for 2-convex initial data, the only nondegenerate lower stratum is isolated, so the singular set near the top stratum is a C^{2,α} curve, ruling out any non-C^{2,α} curve as a singular set.
  • The parabolic Hausdorff dimension of S_k^0 is at most k−1, and the image of S_k^+ under the time function has Hausdorff dimension at most k/(3 + min{1, 2/(n−k)}).
  • The graphical radius of the rescaled flow grows at least exponentially in the degenerate case, with rate e^{(γ−ε)τ/[2(γ+1)]} set by the γ-eigenmode, matching the known neckpinch rate up to ε.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the quantitative uniqueness comparison at the heart of the proof fails only mildly, the regularity exponent α may drop while containment in a Lipschitz or C^{1,1} surface might survive; a direct test is to push two degenerate singularities together in a rotationally symmetric flow and measure spine-angle versus distance.
  • If the paper's conjecture on super-exponential decay is true—namely that such flows coincide with a low spherical flow—then case (iii) carries no geometric data, and the curvature formula would extend to all degenerate singularities by continuity.
  • In semilinear heat equations, curvature of the blow-up set originates from rotation of nondegenerate directions; here it comes from spherical eigenmodes. This suggests analogous C^{2,α} regularity for other geometric flows may come from tracing slow spherical modes rather than spine directions.
  • The dimensional bound dim_H t(S_k^+) ≤ k/(3+α) could be tested on explicit neckpinch families; a family saturating it would show the estimate is sharp and that the α-limit is natural.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the k-cylindrical singular set of a unit-regular Brakke mean curvature flow with finite entropy in R^{n+1}. It introduces a relative L2-nonconcentration estimate with respect to a family of 'low spherical flows' and uses it, together with the quantitative uniqueness of Colding–Minicozzi [CM25] and the Whitney extension theorem, to prove Theorem 1.1: for every 1≤k≤n−1, the nondegenerate part S_k(M)^0 has parabolic Hausdorff dimension at most k−1, the degenerate part S_k(M)^+ is relatively closed in S_k(M), and locally S_k(M)^+ is contained in a k-dimensional C^{2,α}-submanifold for α<min{1,2/(n−k)}. It also proves a quantitative asymptotic profile theorem (Theorem 1.4) and uses it to show that, when S_k(M)^+ is a submanifold, its second fundamental form is determined by the leading W_{1/2}-eigenfunction of the rescaled flow.

Significance. If the main theorem holds, it substantially sharpens the known Lipschitz/C^1 containment of the cylindrical singular set (Colding–Minicozzi) to C^{2,α}, and it gives a concrete geometric interpretation of the leading eigenfunction: the curvature of the singular set is read off from the asymptotic profile of the rescaled flow. The proof strategy is original: it corrects the L2-distance by low spherical flows and converts a location estimate at nearby singularities into uniform Whitney data. The paper is carefully organized and contains many quantitative statements, including graphical radius estimates and detailed asymptotic expansions. Its main risk is the heavy reliance on unpublished or companion preprints, especially [CM25], whose precise content is not stated and which is load-bearing for the central regularity theorem.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5, Lemma 5.1 and Section 6.3] The proof of the location estimate (5.2) uses [CM25] in two places: Step 1 asserts that for every p̄ in a parabolic neighborhood of p the spine of the tangent flow at p̄ is within Ψ(δ|n,ε) of the spine at p, and Section 6.3 asserts that after rescaling the RMCF based at p̄ is uniformly δ_{5.1}-L2 close to C_{n,k} over τ∈[-1,+∞). The paper does not state which theorem of [CM25] gives these uniformity statements. If [CM25] only provides single-point tangent-flow uniqueness under Gaussian-density closeness, the uniform family version needed for the expansions (5.6) and for the uniform error in (5.13) is not justified. This uniformity is load-bearing for the Whitney data (5.2) and hence for Proposition 6.6 and Theorem 1.1(iii).
  2. [Appendix A, Lemma A.3] Lemma A.3 is an a priori estimate with two different exponential weights, stated without proof and justified only by saying the proof is essentially the same as in [Str20]. This lemma is used to prove Lemma A.4, which in turn constructs the low spherical flows used throughout Section 3 and Theorem 1.4. Because the norm ∥·∥_{ℓ,σ,η} in (A.3) differs from the norms in [Str20], the adaptation is not completely formal. The proof, or at least a precise statement of the corresponding result in [Str20], should be supplied.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title/Abstract] The title page contains a line break in 'CUR V A TURE'; should read 'CURVATURE'.
  2. [Section 4.2] 'Corollary (3.15)' should be 'Corollary 3.15'.
  3. [Section 6.1] Typo 'fi nises' should be 'finishes'.
  4. [References] The preprint [CM25] is cited repeatedly without a theorem number in Section 5; please add the precise version and statement used, or note the relevant theorem number once it is available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; load-bearing self-citations and the external [CM25] dependency raise verification burden but do not identify inputs with outputs.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain does not turn back on itself. Theorem 1.4 (the asymptotic-profile trichotomy) is established in Section 4 through a decay-order analysis; only case (i) is imported from the authors' own [SX25b]. The relative L2-nonconcentration Lemma 3.3 is proved in this paper, but its proof invokes the monotonicity inequality [SWX25, (3.4)] from the authors' preceding paper; this is a load-bearing self-citation. It is not circular, however: that inequality is an independent monotonicity statement about distances to level-set flows and does not contain the C^{2,alpha}-containment conclusion, so the target theorem is not assumed in its own proof. The location estimate Lemma 5.1 (and the uniform L2-closeness used in Section 6.3) is taken from the external preprint [CM25] of Colding and Minicozzi; the paper neither proves nor states precisely which theorem of [CM25] yields the quantitative spine-comparison and uniform-time closeness. This is a genuine verification and correctness dependency, but it is an external input rather than an identity with the output. The Whitney data (L_p, q_p) are read off the eigenfunction psi_p supplied by Theorem 4.1 and then fed into Proposition 6.6; no parameter is fitted to the singular set and subsequently relabeled as a prediction. Thus no step of the seven enumerated circular kinds is exhibited. The score of 2 reflects the density of same-author citations that are load-bearing and the reliance on an unverified external preprint, not actual circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the choice of the unit-regular Brakke flow class, on spectral properties of the linearized operator, and on a quantitative uniqueness theorem for cylindrical tangent flows imported from Colding-Minicozzi. No free numerical parameters are fitted; many auxiliary constants (δ, ε, Λ) are chosen small or large existentially.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Unit-regular n-dimensional Brakke flow with finite entropy
    The whole paper is set in this class (Section 2.2); Theorem 1.1 is stated for such flows and uses Brakke-White ε-regularity.
  • standard math White's ε-regularity theorem
    Used in Lemma 3.9, Lemma 3.16, and to pass from L2 closeness to graphical C2 estimates.
  • domain assumption Quantitative uniqueness of cylindrical tangent flow [CM25]
    Load-bearing in Lemma 5.1 Step 1 and Section 6.3; it guarantees that nearby singular points have close spines and uniform δ-L2 closeness over [−1, ∞).
  • standard math Spectral decomposition of the Jacobi operator L_{n,k} (Hermite polynomials and spherical harmonics)
    Used to classify eigenvalues/eigenspaces in Section 2.3.3, and in Lemmas B.3 through B.5.
  • standard math Strehlke's semigroup and nonlinear estimates for the spherical RMCF equation [Str20]
    Used in Appendix A to construct the low spherical flow family U; the paper explicitly skips the proof of Lemma A.3 and refers to [Str20].
invented entities (1)
  • Low spherical flows (family U) independent evidence
    purpose: Provide normalized reference flows whose slow spherical modes are modded out when n-k ≥ 2; used to define the relative decay order N_u and to extract the leading asymptotic profile φ_u in Theorem 1.4.
    They are explicitly constructed in Appendix A via a fixed-point theorem (Lemma A.1) based on Strehlke's estimates, and reduce to the known slow spherical asymptotics when the eigenmode is zero. The construction is part of the paper, so the entity has independent mathematical evidence inside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularity of cylindrical singular sets of mean curvature flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XWCGW63L

@misc{pith2026250901707,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularity of cylindrical singular sets of mean curvature flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XWCGW63L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01707}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study the $k$-cylindrical singular set of mean curvature flow in $\mathbb R^{n+1}$ for each $1\leq k\leq n-1$. We prove that they are locally contained in a $k$-dimensional $C^{2,\alpha}$-submanifold after removing some lower-dimensional parts. Moreover, if the $k$-cylindrical singular set is a $k$-submanifold, then its curvature is determined by the asymptotic profile of the flow at these singularities. As a byproduct, we provide a detailed asymptotic profile and graphical radius estimate at these singularities. The proof is based on a new $L^2$-distance non-concentration property that we introduced in [SWX25], modified into a relative version that allows us to modulo those low eigenmodes that are not decaying fast enough and do not contribute to the curvature of the singular set.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Angenent, and Yoshikazu Giga

    Steven Altschuler, Sigurd B. Angenent, and Yoshikazu Giga. Mean curvature flow through singularities for surfaces of rotation. J. Geom. Anal. , 5(3):293--358, 1995

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    Unique asymptotics of ancient convex mean curvature flow solutions

    Sigurd Angenent, Panagiota Daskalopoulos, and Natasa Sesum. Unique asymptotics of ancient convex mean curvature flow solutions. J. Differential Geom. , 111(3):381--455, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    F. J. Almgren, Jr. Q \ valued functions minimizing D irichlet's integral and the regularity of area minimizing rectifiable currents up to codimension two. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , 8(2):327--328, 1983

    work page 1983

  4. [4]

    Noncollapsing in mean-convex mean curvature flow

    Ben Andrews. Noncollapsing in mean-convex mean curvature flow. Geom. Topol. , 16(3):1413--1418, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    S. B. Angenent and J. J. L. Vel\' a zquez. Degenerate neckpinches in mean curvature flow. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 482:15--66, 1997

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    On the multiplicity one conjecture for mean curvature flows of surfaces

    Richard H Bamler and Bruce Kleiner. On the multiplicity one conjecture for mean curvature flows of surfaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02106 , 2023

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Kenneth A. Brakke. The Motion of a Surface by Its Mean Curvature. (MN-20) . Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1978

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    Embedded self-similar shrinkers of genus 0

    Simon Brendle. Embedded self-similar shrinkers of genus 0. Ann. of Math. (2) , 183(2):715--728, 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Mean curvature flow with generic initial data

    Otis Chodosh, Kyeongsu Choi, Christos Mantoulidis, and Felix Schulze. Mean curvature flow with generic initial data. Invent. Math. , 237(1):121--220, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Mean curvature flow with generic low-entropy initial data ii (2023)

    Otis Chodosh, Kyeongsu Choi, and Felix Schulze. Mean curvature flow with generic low-entropy initial data ii (2023). Preprint available at https://arxiv. org/abs/2309.03856 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Ancient low-entropy flows, mean-convex neighborhoods, and uniqueness

    Kyeongsu Choi, Robert Haslhofer, and Or Hershkovits. Ancient low-entropy flows, mean-convex neighborhoods, and uniqueness. Acta Math. , 228(2):217--301, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Ancient asymptotically cylindrical flows and applications

    Kyeongsu Choi, Robert Haslhofer, Or Hershkovits, and Brian White. Ancient asymptotically cylindrical flows and applications. Invent. Math. , 229(1):139--241, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Quantitative stratification and the regularity of mean curvature flow

    Jeff Cheeger, Robert Haslhofer, and Aaron Naber. Quantitative stratification and the regularity of mean curvature flow. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 23(3):828--847, 2013

    2013

  6. [14]

    Rigidity of generic singularities of mean curvature flow

    Tobias Holck Colding, Tom Ilmanen, and William P Minicozzi. Rigidity of generic singularities of mean curvature flow. Publications math \'e matiques de l'IH \'E S , 121(1):363--382, 2015

    2015

  7. [15]

    Colding and William P

    Tobias H. Colding and William P. Minicozzi, II. Generic mean curvature flow I : generic singularities. Ann. of Math. (2) , 175(2):755--833, 2012

    2012

  8. [16]

    Minicozzi, II

    Tobias Holck Colding and William P. Minicozzi, II. Uniqueness of blowups and ojasiewicz inequalities. Ann. of Math. (2) , 182(1):221--285, 2015

    2015

  9. [17]

    Minicozzi, II

    Tobias Holck Colding and William P. Minicozzi, II. Differentiability of the arrival time. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 69(12):2349--2363, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    Minicozzi, II

    Tobias Holck Colding and William P. Minicozzi, II. The singular set of mean curvature flow with generic singularities. Invent. Math. , 204(2):443--471, 2016

    2016

  11. [19]

    Minicozzi, II

    Tobias Holck Colding and William P. Minicozzi, II. Regularity of the level set flow. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 71(4):814--824, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Minicozzi, II

    Tobias Holck Colding and William P. Minicozzi, II. Quantitative uniqueness for mean curvature flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03634 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Minicozzi, II, and Erik Kj r Pedersen

    Tobias Holck Colding, William P. Minicozzi, II, and Erik Kj r Pedersen. Mean curvature flow. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , 52(2):297--333, 2015

    2015

  14. [22]

    Spectral quantization for ancient asymptotically cylindrical flows

    Wenkui Du and Jingze Zhu. Spectral quantization for ancient asymptotically cylindrical flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.02595 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    L. C. Evans and J. Spruck. Motion of level sets by mean curvature. I . J. Differential Geom. , 33(3):635--681, 1991

    1991

  16. [24]

    The singular sets of area minimizing rectifiable currents with codimension one and of area minimizing flat chains modulo two with arbitrary codimension

    Herbert Federer. The singular sets of area minimizing rectifiable currents with codimension one and of area minimizing flat chains modulo two with arbitrary codimension. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , 76(4):767--771, July 1970

    1970

  17. [25]

    Extension of C^ m, -smooth functions by linear operators

    Charles Fefferman. Extension of C^ m, -smooth functions by linear operators. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 25(1):1--48, 2009

    2009

  18. [26]

    Volume estimates for the singular sets of mean curvature flows

    Hanbing Fang and Yu Li. Volume estimates for the singular sets of mean curvature flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09811 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Generic regularity of free boundaries for the obstacle problem

    Alessio Figalli, Xavier Ros-Oton, and Joaquim Serra. Generic regularity of free boundaries for the obstacle problem. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \'Etudes Sci. , 132:181--292, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    On the fine structure of the free boundary for the classical obstacle problem

    Alessio Figalli and Joaquim Serra. On the fine structure of the free boundary for the classical obstacle problem. Invent. Math. , 215(1):311--366, 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    C^ partial regularity of the singular set in the obstacle problem

    Federico Franceschini and Wiktoria Zato \'n . C^ partial regularity of the singular set in the obstacle problem. Anal. PDE , 18(1):199--264, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    On the mean convexity of a space-and-time neighborhood of generic singularities formed by mean curvature flow

    Zhou Gang. On the mean convexity of a space-and-time neighborhood of generic singularities formed by mean curvature flow. J. Geom. Anal. , 31(10):9819--9890, 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    On the dynamics of formation of generic singularities of mean curvature flow

    Zhou Gang. On the dynamics of formation of generic singularities of mean curvature flow. J. Funct. Anal. , 282(12):Paper No. 109458, 73, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Mean curvature flow of mean convex hypersurfaces

    Robert Haslhofer and Bruce Kleiner. Mean curvature flow of mean convex hypersurfaces. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 70(3):511--546, 2017

    2017

  25. [33]

    Convexity estimates for mean curvature flow and singularities of mean convex surfaces

    Gerhard Huisken and Carlo Sinestrari. Convexity estimates for mean curvature flow and singularities of mean convex surfaces. Acta mathematica , 183(1):45--70, 1999

    1999

  26. [34]

    Asymptotic behavior for singularities of the mean curvature flow

    Gerhard Huisken. Asymptotic behavior for singularities of the mean curvature flow. J. Differential Geom. , 31(1):285--299, 1990

    1990

  27. [35]

    Local and global behaviour of hypersurfaces moving by mean curvature

    Gerhard Huisken. Local and global behaviour of hypersurfaces moving by mean curvature. In Differential geometry: partial differential equations on manifolds ( L os A ngeles, CA , 1990) , volume 54, Part 1 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , pages 175--191. Amer. Math. Soc., Providen...

    1990

  28. [36]

    Generalized flow of sets by mean curvature on a manifold

    Tom Ilmanen. Generalized flow of sets by mean curvature on a manifold. Indiana University mathematics journal , pages 671--705, 1992

    1992

  29. [37]

    Elliptic regularization and partial regularity for motion by mean curvature , volume 520

    Tom Ilmanen. Elliptic regularization and partial regularity for motion by mean curvature , volume 520. American Mathematical Soc., 1994

    1994

  30. [38]

    Sharp lower bounds on density for area-minimizing cones

    Tom Ilmanen and Brian White. Sharp lower bounds on density for area-minimizing cones. Cambridge Journal of Mathematics , 3(1):1--18, 2015

    2015

  31. [39]

    Lieberman

    Gary M. Lieberman. Second order parabolic differential equations . World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1996

    1996

  32. [40]

    On degenerate blow-up profiles for the subcritical semilinear heat equation

    Frank Merle and Hatem Zaag. On degenerate blow-up profiles for the subcritical semilinear heat equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.06795 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Rate of convergence of the mean curvature flow

    Natasa Sesum. Rate of convergence of the mean curvature flow. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 61(4):464--485, 2008

    2008

  34. [42]

    Cylindrical tangent cones and the singular set of minimal submanifolds

    Leon Simon. Cylindrical tangent cones and the singular set of minimal submanifolds. Journal of Differential Geometry , 38(3):585--652, 1993

    1993

  35. [43]

    Asymptotics for the level set equation near a maximum

    Nicholas Strehlke. Asymptotics for the level set equation near a maximum. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 763:201--221, 2020

    2020

  36. [44]

    Singularity profile in the mean curvature flow

    Weimin Sheng and Xu-Jia Wang. Singularity profile in the mean curvature flow. Methods Appl. Anal. , 16(2):139--155, 2009

    2009

  37. [45]

    Passing through nondegenerate singularities in mean curvature flows

    Ao Sun, Zhihan Wang, and Jinxin Xue. Passing through nondegenerate singularities in mean curvature flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16678 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Multiplicity one for min-max theory in compact manifolds with boundary and its applications

    Ao Sun, Zhichao Wang, and Xin Zhou. Multiplicity one for min-max theory in compact manifolds with boundary and its applications. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 63(3):Paper No. 70, 52, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Generic dynamics of mean curvature flows with closed singularities

    Ao Sun and Jinxin Xue. Generic dynamics of mean curvature flows with closed singularities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.03101 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Generic dynamics of mean curvature flows with asymptotically conical singularities

    Ao Sun and Jinxin Xue. Generic dynamics of mean curvature flows with asymptotically conical singularities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.05066, Sci. China Math. , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Generic mean curvature flows with cylindrical singularities I : the normal forms and nondegeneracy

    Ao Sun and Jinxin Xue. Generic mean curvature flows with cylindrical singularities I : the normal forms and nondegeneracy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00419 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    The topology of hypersurfaces moving by mean curvature

    Brian White. The topology of hypersurfaces moving by mean curvature. Communications in analysis and geometry , 3(2):317--333, 1995

    1995

  43. [51]

    Stratification of minimal surfaces, mean curvature flows, and harmonic maps

    Brian White. Stratification of minimal surfaces, mean curvature flows, and harmonic maps. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 488:1--35, 1997

    1997

  44. [52]

    The size of the singular set in mean curvature flow of mean-convex sets

    Brian White. The size of the singular set in mean curvature flow of mean-convex sets. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 13(3):665--695, 2000

    2000

  45. [53]

    Evolution of curves and surfaces by mean curvature

    Brian White. Evolution of curves and surfaces by mean curvature. In Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians, V ol. I ( B eijing, 2002) , pages 525--538. Higher Ed. Press, Beijing, 2002

    2002

  46. [54]

    The nature of singularities in mean curvature flow of mean-convex sets

    Brian White. The nature of singularities in mean curvature flow of mean-convex sets. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 16(1):123--138, 2003

    2003

  47. [55]

    A local regularity theorem for mean curvature flow

    Brian White. A local regularity theorem for mean curvature flow. Ann. of Math. (2) , 161(3):1487--1519, 2005

    2005

  48. [56]

    Subsequent singularities in mean-convex mean curvature flow

    Brian White. Subsequent singularities in mean-convex mean curvature flow. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 54(2):1457--1468, 2015

    2015

  49. [57]

    On the regularity of the blow-up set for semilinear heat equations

    Hatem Zaag. On the regularity of the blow-up set for semilinear heat equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e C Anal. Non Lin\'eaire , 19(5):505--542, 2002

    2002

  50. [58]

    One-dimensional behavior of singular N -dimensional solutions of semilinear heat equations

    Hatem Zaag. One-dimensional behavior of singular N -dimensional solutions of semilinear heat equations. Comm. Math. Phys. , 225(3):523--549, 2002

    2002

  51. [59]

    Determination of the curvature of the blow-up set and refined singular behavior for a semilinear heat equation

    Hatem Zaag. Determination of the curvature of the blow-up set and refined singular behavior for a semilinear heat equation. Duke Math. J. , 133(3):499--525, 2006

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.