Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Dynamic control of laser driven electron acceleration in a photonic structure using programmable optical pulses

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A liquid-crystal spatial light modulator, combined with a pulse-front-tilted laser, programs the phase and amplitude of the field seen by electrons in a dual-grating photonic accelerator, enabling live correction, transverse focusing, bunch

desk verdict The 0.55 MeV record is not an SLM result, but the paper's real demonstrations of live phase/amplitude control of a DLA are solid and worth a careful read. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08170 v1 pith:XWELVCYE submitted 2025-09-09 physics.acc-ph physics.optics

Sophie Crisp , R. Joel England , Alexander Ody , Pietro Musumeci This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.acc-phphysics.optics
keywords dielectriclaseraccelerationspatiallightmodulatoropticalphasecontrolpulsefronttiltalternatingfocusingponderomotiveelectronbunchingphotonicstructures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates that a commercial liquid-crystal spatial light modulator can serve as a general, reprogrammable control layer for dielectric laser accelerators. By imaging a pulse-front-tilted laser onto the modulator and relaying it to a fused-silica dual-grating structure, the authors turn spatial phase patterns on the mask into time-dependent field variations along the electron trajectory. This lets them flatten the phase seen by the electrons, extending phase-matched acceleration beyond 4 mm, impose focusing schemes such as alternating-phase and ponderomotive focusing, and induce bunching by inserting drift sections. Measured energy gains reach 0.55 MeV, and simulations indicate the same controls could trap and accelerate over 20% of a matched beam by 2.4 MeV in a 5 mm structure. The point is that accelerator lattice design moves from fixed nanofabrication into software.

What carries the argument

The enabling device is the liquid-crystal spatial light modulator (SLM), used in a pulse-front-tilt (PFT) imaging system with a cylindrical lens that breaks the imaging condition in x. Its z-dimension pixels impart programmable phase masks that map onto the time-varying field along the electron path; its x-dimension Fresnel lens profiles control laser intensity at the channel. The governing identity is the phase balance phi(z) = phi_TW(z) + phi_SLM(z) + phi_NL(I0,z), whose terms are separately addressed by the mask: a z-dependent phase ramp tunes phase velocity, a quadratic correction compensates acceleration-induced dephasing, a nonlinear term counteracts Kerr phase in the 1 mm fused-silica

What would settle it

Place an electro-optic sampler at the DLA gap and directly measure the time-dependent field profile while the SLM writes a known phase mask; if the retrieved field phase does not match the programmed mask after accounting for the grating and pulse-front tilt, the claimed control mechanism is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that dynamic, software-based control of beam dynamics in a dielectric laser accelerator can be achieved by programming a single liquid-crystal spatial light modulator (SLM) placed in a pulse-front-tilted (PFT) imaging line. The PFT stretches the laser-electron interaction to multiple millimeters, while the SLM, imaged in the z direction and defocused in x, writes arbitrary phase profiles that cancel the traveling-wave velocity slip and Kerr nonlinear phase shifts, and writes Fresnel-lens amplitude profiles that set the local laser intensity. The authors demonstrate segment-by-segment phase matching that stitches a z-dependent incident-angle profile, extension of the matc

Load-bearing premise

The control scheme assumes that the phase and amplitude pattern written on the liquid-crystal mask survives the optical relay and the 1 mm fused-silica structure intact, so that the field each electron actually experiences is the programmed field; phase-reset intensity gaps, pixel crosstalk, or Kerr-induced phase shifts would make the software correction not what the electrons see.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Live phase correction means accelerator alignment and fabrication errors can be tuned out in software rather than by rebuilding the structure.
  • The same SLM can switch between acceleration, focusing, and bunching modes, so a single experiment can test multiple lattice designs in minutes.
  • With an ideal matched beam, simulations predict over 20% of injected particles reach about 2.4 MeV over 5 mm, pointing toward practical on-chip accelerators.
  • The method's insensitivity to the cause of dephasing makes it a natural fit for automated machine-learning optimization of accelerator performance.
  • Ponderomotive focusing carries an energy-gain cost (10-30% of field amplitude for acceleration), while alternating-phase focusing offers higher gradient and throughput; the choice can be programmed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the SLM-to-field mapping stays faithful, the same phase-mask technique could be applied to other photonic structures (silicon, plasmonic, mid-IR) with no change of principle, making the control layer structure-agnostic.
  • The demonstrated empirical phase stitching suggests a fully closed-loop experiment that maximizes gain continuously as beam energy, laser alignment, or temperature drift; the paper hints at but does not implement real-time feedback.
  • Reducing phase-reset intensity gaps and substrate nonlinearity (thinner gratings, dual illumination, higher-efficiency SLMs) is the natural next step to push matched interaction beyond the current about 4 mm; this follows directly from the paper's stated limitations.
  • A testable extension: use the same SLM to encode phase masks that compensate coupling to higher-order modes and measure transmitted charge as a function of programmed focusing strength on a well-matched beam, quantifying APF and ponderomotive confinement beyond the energy-spectrum signatures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments with a dielectric laser accelerator (DLA) illuminated by a pulse-front-tilted (PFT) laser, where a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator (SLM) programs the phase and amplitude of the optical pulse. The authors demonstrate segment-by-segment phase matching over multi-mm interaction lengths, excitation of spatial harmonics for ponderomotive focusing, alternating-phase focusing (APF), and phase-jump-based bunching. The central claim, as stated in the Abstract, is that programmable liquid-crystal-mask control enables dynamic tuning of DLA beam dynamics and leads to measured energy gains up to 0.55 MeV. The paper also reports simulations of combined bunching and APF schemes with idealized parameters.

Significance. If the central claim is properly supported, this is a valuable step: it would show that a commercial SLM can serve as a general, reconfigurable control layer for DLAs, replacing custom nanofabricated phase-reset structures. The paper contains several clean, quantitative demonstrations: the positions of ponderomotive spatial harmonics and their Jacobi-Anger amplitude scaling (Fig. 3d,e) agree with theory, and the APF phase-jump scan matches simulation (Fig. 4a). These are genuine strengths. However, the headline record energy gain is not obtained with the programmable SLM in the beam path, and the extended-interaction comparison is not a controlled same-day measurement. The overall contribution is significant but the presentation overstates the programmable-control record.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2 (piezo mirror paragraph) and Abstract] The Abstract and Discussion attribute the 0.55 MeV peak energy gain to the liquid-crystal-mask programmable scheme, but Section 2 states that this record was obtained after replacing the SLM with a piezo-controlled mirror, explicitly to overcome SLM transmission losses and fluence limitations. The sentence 'With the piezo mirror in place ... a DLA-record peak energy gain of 0.55±0.05 MeV was observed' directly contradicts the Abstract's implication that the programmable liquid-crystal mask enabled this gain. The record should be reported as a separate static-mirror result, and the programmable-SLM results should be presented with their own (lower) energy-gain figures.
  2. [Fig. 2d and accompanying text] The comparison of energy gain versus interaction length for the optimized phase profile versus the flat-phase case is not a controlled, same-day measurement. The text notes that 'the optimal Δθ_I vs. z curve was observed to be sensitive to day-to-day small changes in e-beam alignment, energy and laser setup so the data in this plot corresponds to a slightly different tune than a.' Day-to-day drifts in beam energy, alignment, and laser setup can change the measured energy gain by amounts comparable to the claimed extension effect. A controlled interleaved measurement, or at least a quantitative estimate of the run-to-run systematic uncertainty, is needed to support the 4 mm interaction-length claim.
  3. [Section 4.4 (SLM) and the PFT transfer assumption] The scheme assumes that the phase and amplitude pattern written on the SLM is faithfully mapped, via the pulse-front-tilt imaging system and through 1 mm of fused silica, to the time-dependent field experienced by electrons along their trajectory. The paper itself states that phase resets create intensity gaps and that nonlinear phase shifts at large intensity variations 'pose significant challenges to retain phase coherence for the full structure length.' The indirect evidence from harmonic positions and APF agreement is encouraging, but the 4 mm phase-matched interaction and the optimized phase maps depend on this transfer fidelity. The manuscript should either provide direct characterization of the delivered temporal phase profile (e.g., interferometric measurement after the DLA plane) or quantitatively bound the effect of pixel crosstalk, phase-reset gaps, and Kerr nonlinearity on th
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption should state explicitly that panel (e) was recorded with the piezo mirror (no SLM in the beam path) and that panel (d) corresponds to a different tuning than panel (a), as noted in the text.
  2. [Section 4.1] '8.7 MeV (6.2 MeV for Fig. 4b)' appears to be an incorrect cross-reference; the 6.2 MeV bunching experiment is shown in the bottom panels of Fig. 4c/d, not in Fig. 4b.
  3. [Section 1] Typographical error: 'in conjuction with' should be 'in conjunction with'.
  4. [Section 4.1] Typographical error: 'at the the DLA plane' should be 'at the DLA plane'.
  5. [Reference [43]] The reference title contains a typo: 'chartacterization' should be 'characterization'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; controls are demonstrated against independent theoretical predictions and simulations.

full rationale

The paper's claimed predictions (spatial harmonic positions and amplitudes) follow from the Jacobi-Anger expansion applied to the programmed phase mask, a mathematical identity independent of the experimental data; the measured peak positions match Δθ = n·k_p/k_g and the relative amplitudes track J_n(A_p). The APF energy-gain scan is compared to a simulation code (SHarD) whose inputs (gap, structure factor, beam parameters) are independently specified, so the comparison is not forced. The phase profile is optimized (fitted) rather than predicted, which is appropriate for a control demonstration and does not constitute a prediction derived from itself. Self-citations (structure design [35], phase-matching [30], simulation code [47]) provide methodology and prior results but do not carry the logical weight of the new claims. The paper candidly states limitations of the SLM (phase-reset intensity gaps, nonlinear phase shifts) that bound the claims. A factual inconsistency exists: the 0.55 MeV record was obtained with a piezo mirror after removing the SLM (Sec. 2), so the abstract's phrasing overstates the SLM's role; this is an attribution/correctness issue, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demonstration rests on a calibrated structure factor, a fitted phase map, and several modeling assumptions about the DLA field, the ballistic electron model, the PFT-to-time mapping, and the Kerr effect. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • structure factor kappa = 0.05
    Calibrated from the energy modulation induced by a short non-PFT laser pulse and used as an input to gain estimates and simulations (Sec. 4.2).
  • per-segment optimal phase tilt map delta_theta_I(z) = stitched from segment-by-segment maximization (Fig. 2a)
    Fitted to maximize measured energy gain in 1.7 mm sections; the resulting phase map is what yields the extended interaction claim.
  • effective interaction length L_eff = 2.5 +/- 0.5 mm
    Estimated by fitting the width of the delta-theta resonance with a ballistic model (Fig. 3b); used to infer the interaction length.
  • simulated beam parameters = normalized emittance 200 nm, sigma_y = 30 um, energy spread 0.05% (or idealized 1 nm, 1 um)
    Chosen to model the experiment; simulation predictions depend on these inputs (Sec. 4.6).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The DLA interaction can be modeled by a one-dimensional integral of a traveling wave with phase phi(z) = k_g z - k0 z/beta(z) + phi_SLM + phi_NL.
    Sec. 1 introduces this decomposition as the basis for the phase-matching analysis.
  • domain assumption The ballistic (constant or slowly varying velocity) model for electron phase evolution is accurate enough to interpret resonance widths and predict energy gain vs delta-theta.
    Used in Sec. 2.1 to estimate interaction length and in Sec. 4.6 for simulations.
  • standard math The Jacobi-Anger expansion e^{i A_p sin(2 pi z / T_p)} = sum J_n(A_p) e^{i 2 pi n z / T_p} correctly describes the spatial harmonic content of the ponderomotive phase mask.
    Sec. 2.1 uses this identity to predict the positions and amplitudes of the observed harmonic resonances.
  • domain assumption The pulse-front-tilt imaging system maps the SLM spatial phase in z to the temporal phase along the electron trajectory, and the cylindrical lens breaks imaging in x to allow amplitude control.
    Sec. 4.3 and Fig. 1b describe this mapping; it is essential for the claimed control.
  • domain assumption The Kerr-effect dephasing is given by phi_NL = n2 I0(z) k_g Delta_y with Delta_y = 1 mm.
    Sec. 1 states this model and uses it to design the compensation mask.
  • domain assumption The measured energy spectrum tails (FOM > 1.5 over at least 3 pixels) are a valid estimator of the maximum energy gain and loss.
    Sec. 4.1 defines the figure of merit used to extract the reported gains.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamic control of laser driven electron acceleration in a photonic structure using programmable optical pulses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XWELVCYE

@misc{pith2026250908170,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamic control of laser driven electron acceleration in a photonic structure using programmable optical pulses},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XWELVCYE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08170}
}
read the original abstract

Progress in optical techniques has made precision control of the phase profile in optical pulses common and accessible in scientific laboratories. Carefully shaping the field profile of a laser pulse can be used to master the dynamics of electrons traveling in photonic accelerating structures such as the ones obtained by precisely aligning two dielectric gratings. Here we show that by applying a liquid-crystal-mask to program the phase and amplitude of an infrared laser pulse in combination with a pulse front tilt scheme, it is possible to implement dynamic control on a laser accelerator. This results in a nearly limitless live tuning capability of the accelerator beam dynamics, allowing the demonstration software-based correction of structure and optical front imperfections, implementation of transverse focusing schemes, control of the energy and charge of the output beam, and ultimately optimization of the interaction length, leading to measured energy gains of up to 0.55 MeV.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Reviews of Modern Physics93(1), 015006 (2021)

    Shiltsev, V., Zimmermann, F.: Modern and future colliders. Reviews of Modern Physics93(1), 015006 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Reviews of Modern Physics88(1), 015006 (2016)

    Pellegrini, C., Marinelli, A., Reiche, S.: The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers. Reviews of Modern Physics88(1), 015006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Artech House, Norwood, MA (2012)

    Hanna, S.: RF Linear Accelerators for Medical and Industrial Applications. Artech House, Norwood, MA (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2006)

    Cleland, M.R.: Industrial Applications of Electron Accelerators. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    England, R.J., Noble, R.J., Bane, K., Dowell, D.H., Ng, C.-K., Spencer, J.E., Tantawi, S., Wu, Z., Byer, R.L., Peralta, E., Soong, K., Chang, C.-M., Montazeri, B., Wolf, S.J., Cowan, B., Dawson, J., Gai, W., Hommelhoff, P., Huang, Y.-C., Jing, C., McGuinness, C., Palmer, R.B., Naranjo, B., Rosenzweig, J., Travish, G., Mizrahi, A., Schachter, L., Sears, C....

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Sch¨ onenberger, N., Mittelbach, A., Yousefi, P., McNeur, J., Niedermayer, U., Hommelhoff, P.: Generation and characterization of attosecond microbunched electron pulse trains via dielectric laser acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 264803 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.264803

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.264803 2019

  7. [7]

    Physical Review Letters123(26), 264802 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.264802

    Black, D.S., Niedermayer, U., Miao, Y., Zhao, Z., Solgaard, O., Byer, R.L., Leedle, K.J.: Net Acceleration and Direct Measurement of Attosecond Electron Pulses in a Silicon Dielectric Laser Accelerator. Physical Review Letters123(26), 264802 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.264802

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.264802 2019

  8. [8]

    Advances in Optics and Photonics 14(4), 862–932 (2022)

    Shiloh, R., Sch¨ onenberger, N., Adiv, Y., Ruimy, R., Karnieli, A., Hughes, T., England, R.J., Leedle, K.J., Black, D.S., Zhao, Z.,et al.: Miniature light-driven nanophotonic electron acceleration and control. Advances in Optics and Photonics 14(4), 862–932 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Nature 2013 503:7474503(7474), 91–94 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12664

    Peralta, E.A., Soong, K., England, R.J., Colby, E.R., Wu, Z., Montazeri, B., McGuinness, C., McNeur, J., Leedle, K.J., Walz, D., Sozer, E.B., Cowan, B., Schwartz, B., Travish, G., Byer, R.L.: Demonstration of electron acceleration in a laser-driven dielectric microstructure. N...

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    Physical Review Letters111(13), 134803 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.134803 arXiv:1308.0464

    Breuer, J., Hommelhoff, P.: Laser-based acceleration of nonrelativistic electrons 15 at a dielectric structure. Physical Review Letters111(13), 134803 (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.134803 arXiv:1308.0464

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Communications Physics 2018 1:11(1), 1–7 (2018) https://doi.org/10

    Cesar, D., Custodio, S., Maxson, J., Musumeci, P., Shen, X., Threlkeld, E., Eng- land, R.J., Hanuka, A., Makasyuk, I.V., Peralta, E.A., Wootton, K.P., Wu, Z.: High-field nonlinear optical response and phase control in a dielectric laser accel- erator. Communications Physics 20...

    2018

  4. [12]

    Cesar, D., Maxson, J., Shen, X., Wootton, K.P., Tan, S., England, R.J., Musumeci, P.: Enhanced energy gain in a dielectric laser accelerator using a tilted pulse front laser. Opt. Express26(22), 29216–29224 (2018) https://doi.org/10. 1364/OE.26.029216

    2018

  5. [13]

    Sci- ence367(6473), 79–83 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay5734 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aay5734

    Sapra, N.V., Yang, K.Y., Vercruysse, D., Leedle, K.J., Black, D.S., Eng- land, R.J., Su, L., Trivedi, R., Miao, Y., Solgaard, O., Byer, R.L., Vuˇ ckovi´ c, J.: On-chip integrated laser-driven particle accelerator. Sci- ence367(6473), 79–83 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc...

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    Nature Communications14(1), 5857 (2023)

    Zheng, D., Huang, S., Li, J., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Tian, H., Yang, H., Li, J.: Efficiently accelerated free electrons by metallic laser accelerator. Nature Communications14(1), 5857 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams17(12), 121302 (2014)

    Bar-Lev, D., Scheuer, J.: Plasmonic metasurface for efficient ultrashort pulse laser-driven particle acceleration. Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams17(12), 121302 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Ultrafast Science3, 0050 (2023)

    Mei, X., Zha, R., Pan, Y., Wang, S., Sun, B., Lei, C., Ke, C., Zhao, Z., Wang, D.: Dielectric laser accelerators driven by ultrashort, ultraintense long-wave infrared lasers. Ultrafast Science3, 0050 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Optics Express32(16), 28348–28355 (2024)

    Br¨ uckner, L., Chlouba, T., Morimoto, Y., Sch¨ onenberger, N., Shibuya, T., Siefke, T., Zeitner, U.D., Hommelhoff, P.: Mid-infrared dielectric laser acceleration in a silicon dual pillar structure. Optics Express32(16), 28348–28355 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Niedermayer, U., Egenolf, T., Boine-Frankenheim, O., Hommelhoff, P.: Alternating-phase focusing for dielectric-laser acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 214801 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.214801

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Naranjo, B., Valloni, A., Putterman, S., Rosenzweig, J.B.: Stable charged-particle acceleration and focusing in a laser accelerator using spatial harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 164803 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.164803

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    Nature597(7877), 498–502 (2021) https://doi

    Shiloh, R., Illmer, J., Chlouba, T., Yousefi, P., Sch¨ onenberger, N., Niedermayer, U., Mittelbach, A., Hommelhoff, P.: Electron phase-space control in photonic chip-based particle acceleration. Nature597(7877), 498–502 (2021) https://doi. 16 org/10.1038/s41586-021-03812-9

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Zhang, L., Xu, H., Liu, W.: Inverse cherenkov dielectric laser accelerator with alternating phase focusing for subrelativistic particles. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 110401 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.27.110401

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Niedermayer, U., Black, D.S., Leedle, K.J., Miao, Y., Byer, R.L., Solgaard, O.: Low-energy-spread attosecond bunching and coherent electron acceleration in dielectric nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Appl.15, 021002 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.L021002

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Nature622(7983), 476–480 (2023)

    Chlouba, T., Shiloh, R., Kraus, S., Br¨ uckner, L., Litzel, J., Hommelhoff, P.: Coherent nanophotonic electron accelerator. Nature622(7983), 476–480 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Broaddus, P., Egenolf, T., Black, D.S., Murillo, M., Woodahl, C., Miao, Y., Nie- dermayer, U., Byer, R.L., Leedle, K.J., Solgaard, O.: Subrelativistic alternating phase focusing dielectric laser accelerators. Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 085001 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLe...

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    https://doi.org/10.29026/oes.2023.230026

    Yang, Y., Forbes, A., Cao, L.: A Review of Liquid Crystal Spatial Light Mod- ulators: Devices and Applications. https://doi.org/10.29026/oes.2023.230026 . https://www.oejournal.org/article/id/653a19e299d88178fb7a4378

    2023

  18. [26]

    Yao, E., Franke-Arnold, S., Courtial, J., Padgett, M.J., Barnett, S.M.: Obser- vation of quantum entanglement using spatial light modulators. Opt. Express 14(26), 13089–13094 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.013089

    2006 doi

  19. [27]

    Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews5(1), 81–101 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.200900047 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/lpor.200900047

    Maurer, C., Jesacher, A., Bernet, S., Ritsch-Marte, M.: What spa- tial light modulators can do for optical microscopy. Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews5(1), 81–101 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.200900047 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/lpor.200900047

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    Nature424(6950), 810–816 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01935

    Grier, D.G.: A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature424(6950), 810–816 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01935

    2003 doi

  21. [29]

    In: 2018 IEEE Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop (AAC), pp

    Cesar, D., Musumeci, P., England, J.: All optical control of beam dynamics in a dla. In: 2018 IEEE Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop (AAC), pp. 1–5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/AAC.2018.8659380

    2018

  22. [30]

    Crisp, S., Ody, A., Musumeci, P., England, R.J.: Resonant phase matching by oblique illumination of a dielectric laser accelerator. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams24, 121305 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.24.121305

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Physical Review Accelerators and Beams27(5), 051303 (2024) 17

    Crisp, S., Ody, A., England, J., Musumeci, P.: Extended interaction length laser- driven acceleration in a tunable dielectric structure. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams27(5), 051303 (2024) 17

    2024

  24. [32]

    Physical review letters125(16), 164801 (2020)

    Niedermayer, U., Egenolf, T., Boine-Frankenheim, O.: Three dimensional alternating-phase focusing for dielectric-laser electron accelerators. Physical review letters125(16), 164801 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Applied optics56(29), 8201–8206 (2017)

    Wei, Y., Ibison, M., Xia, G., Smith, J., Welsch, C.: Dual-grating dielectric accel- erators driven by a pulse-front-tilted laser. Applied optics56(29), 8201–8206 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Alesini, D., Battisti, A., Ferrario, M., Foggetta, L., Lollo, V., Ficcadenti, L., Pettinacci, V., Custodio, S., Pirez, E., Musumeci, P., Palumbo, L.: New technol- ogy based on clamping for high gradient radio frequency photogun. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams18, 092001 (2015) http...

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    Instruments7(4) (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/ instruments7040051

    Crisp, S., Ody, A., Musumeci, P.: Asymmetric dual-grating dielectric laser accelerator optimization. Instruments7(4) (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/ instruments7040051

    2023

  28. [36]

    Optics express27(18), 25046– 25063 (2019)

    Moser, S., Ritsch-Marte, M., Thalhammer, G.: Model-based compensation of pixel crosstalk in liquid crystal spatial light modulators. Optics express27(18), 25046– 25063 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams11(6), 061301 (2008)

    Sears, C.M., Colby, E., Ischebeck, R., McGuinness, C., Nelson, J., Noble, R., Siemann, R.H., Spencer, J., Walz, D., Plettner, T.,et al.: Production and characterization of attosecond electron bunch trains. Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams11(6), 061301 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices70(5), 2514–2520 (2023)

    Sun, L., Liu, W., Zhang, L., Jia, Q., Xu, H., Liu, S.: High-bunch-charge and high- energy-gain inverse-cherenkov particle accelerator with prebunched beam. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices70(5), 2514–2520 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Physical Review Accelerators and Beams24(12), 121302 (2021)

    England, R.J., Sch¨ achter, L.: Beam-beam interaction in a dielectric laser acceler- ator electron-positron collider. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams24(12), 121302 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Physical Review X11(4), 041042 (2021)

    Adiv, Y., Wang, K., Dahan, R., Broaddus, P., Miao, Y., Black, D., Leedle, K., Byer, R.L., Solgaard, O., England, R.J.,et al.: Quantum nature of dielectric laser accelerators. Physical Review X11(4), 041042 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics47(23), 234005 (2014)

    Koyama, K., Otsuki, S., Uesaka, M., Yoshida, M., Aimidula, A.: Parameter study of a laser-driven dielectric accelerator for radiobiology research. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics47(23), 234005 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Physical Review Accelerators and Beams23(4), 044601 (2020) 18

    Edelen, A., Neveu, N., Frey, M., Huber, Y., Mayes, C., Adelmann, A.: Machine learning for orders of magnitude speedup in multiobjective optimization of parti- cle accelerator systems. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams23(4), 044601 (2020) 18

    2020

  35. [43]

    In: Proc

    Crisp, S.A., Musumeci, P., Ody, A.: All optical chartacterization of a dual grat- ing accelerator structure. In: Proc. IPAC’22. International Particle Accelerator Conference, pp. 1602–1605. JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, ??? (2022). https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2...

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Recent optical and photonic technologies, 207–230 (2010)

    F¨ ul¨ op, J.A., Hebling, J.: Applications of tilted-pulse-front excitation. Recent optical and photonic technologies, 207–230 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Kreier, D., Baum, P.: Avoiding temporal distortions in tilted pulses. Opt. Lett. 37(12), 2373–2375 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.37.002373

    2012 doi

  38. [46]

    Cesar, D., Maxson, J., Musumeci, P., Shen, X., England, R.J., Wootton, K.P.: Optical design for increased interaction length in a high gradient dielectric laser accelerator. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors a...

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ody, A., Crisp, S., Musumeci, P., Cesar, D., England, R.J.: SHarD: A beam dynamics simulation code for dielectric laser accelerators based on spatial har- monic field expansion. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detecto...

    2021

  40. [48]

    Physical Review Accelerators and Beams23(2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams

    Black, D.S., Zhao, Z., Leedle, K.J., Miao, Y., Byer, R.L., Fan, S., Solgaard, O.: Operating modes of dual-grating dielectric laser accelerators. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams23(2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams. 23.114001 19

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.