Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

A systematic review of norm emergence in multi-agent systems

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A systematic review of 39 studies finds that network topology, emotions, and shared values are the decisive factors in how norms emerge and stabilise in multi-agent systems, with emotions and values largely under-simulated.

desk verdict Useful updated PRISMA survey of norm emergence in MAS, but the corpus is not consistently defined and the emotion/value gap claim is built on references outside the selected set. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10609 v1 pith:XXNIKGUT submitted 2024-12-13 cs.MA

Carmengelys Cordova , Joaquin Taverner , Elena Del Val , Estefania Argente This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.MA
keywords normemergencemulti-agentsystemsnormativesystematicreviewPRISMAsocialnormsnetworktopologyemotions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish, through a PRISMA-following systematic review, that norm emergence in multi-agent systems is driven by a small set of structural, cognitive, emotional, and value-based factors, and that the literature has so far paid too little attention to emotions and social values. If the review is right, future designers of normative multi-agent systems should look first at network topology and propagation mechanisms, and should treat emotional and value dynamics as genuine levers rather than optional extras. The review also claims that its analysis of how emotions and values are simulated is a novel contribution to the field.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the PRISMA systematic review protocol, supplemented by a hand search and a citation-relevance filter. The filter computes a ratio $R = C / (2024 - A)$ from citation count $C$ and publication year $A$, removing articles with $R < 1$ while automatically keeping papers from 2023 and 2024. This procedure reduces 304 candidate records to 39 studies, which are then classified along two axes: the phase of the norm life cycle each model addresses, and the set of emergence factors (topology, propagation mechanisms, cognitive abilities, emotions, values) it simulates. The classification tables produced by this machinery are what carry the review's findings about gaps and dominant mechanisms.

What would settle it

A concrete test would be to re-run the same search queries and inclusion criteria but skip the citation filter, retaining all 83 full-text screened papers, and then code those papers for whether they simulate emotions or values. If the excluded 44 papers contain a substantial number of emotion- or value-based norm emergence models, the novelty claim and the gap analysis would collapse. A second test: use a different citation threshold (for example, R<0.5 or R<2) and check whether the ranking of dominant factors changes materially; if it does, the review's conclusions are an artifact of its cutoff.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the 39 selected studies, published between 2005 and 2024, provide a representative map of mechanisms and factors that influence norm emergence in multi-agent systems, organised along a five-phase life cycle (creation, diffusion and adoption, internalisation, forgetting, transformation). The paper finds that social network topology—diameter, neighbourhood size, clustering, betweenness, density, and weak ties—is the most frequently exploited structural factor, and that propagation mechanisms (normative advisor, role model, interaction learning, punishment and reward) are well represented. In contrast, emotions and social values appear rarely as explicit simulation mechanisms, and most models cover only the early life-cycle phases, leaving internalisation and forgetting underdeveloped. The authors argue that this gap is a genuine opportunity for future research and that their review is the first to analyse the simulation of emotions and values in this context.

Load-bearing premise

The strongest load-bearing premise is that the citation-based selection filter (keeping only papers with at least one citation per year since publication, plus all 2023–2024 papers) identifies the relevant literature, so that the 39 chosen papers faithfully represent what the field has actually studied.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Normative multi-agent systems that aim for stable, adaptable norms should explicitly model network topology parameters such as clustering and weak ties, since the review identifies these as the most influential structural factors.
  • Models that cover the full norm life cycle, including internalisation and forgetting, are rare; building and evaluating such models would address a gap the review demonstrates rather than merely asserts.
  • Incorporating emotions (guilt, shame, anger) and value orientations into agent architectures is likely to improve norm internalisation and compliance, according to the small set of studies that test these mechanisms.
  • Hybrid approaches that combine centralised prescription with emergent interaction appear better suited to dynamic environments than either pure prescriptive or pure emergent models, a conclusion the review draws from the comparative analysis.
  • Future empirical work on norm emergence should report which life-cycle phases are actually covered, so that the field can measure progress toward comprehensive normative models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review's gap claim about emotions and values may partly be an artifact of its citation filter: if the excluded low-citation papers disproportionately address emotions or values, the novelty assertion would weaken under a different selection rule.
  • A natural testable extension is to run the same PRISMA query on a later corpus (for example, including 2024–2026 work on LLM-based agent societies) and check whether the emotional and value gap is closing, as suggested by the hand-included reference [155].
  • The five-phase life cycle framework could serve as a standard reporting template for normative multi-agent systems, giving the community a shared vocabulary for comparing which parts of the norm lifecycle a model actually simulates.
  • If the citation ratio filter is meant to proxy 'influence,' the review implicitly assumes that recent low-cited papers are not relevant; an alternative relevance measure, such as expert nomination or venue quality, might yield a different factor ranking.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a systematic literature review, following the PRISMA method, of norm emergence in multi-agent systems (MAS). The authors report a search conducted in March 2024 across five databases plus a Google Scholar hand search, resulting in 304 initial records and a final set of 39 selected studies. The review classifies the selected works according to normative approach (prescriptive, emergent, hybrid), representation (explicit/implicit), norm types, life-cycle phases, and factors influencing emergence (topology, propagation mechanisms, cognitive abilities, emotions, values, online/offline methods). The paper claims that an updated, systematic synthesis of 2005--2024 work is provided and that the analysis of how emotions and social values are simulated in norm emergence is a novelty in the field.

Significance. If the corpus is sound, this review would be a useful reference for the normative MAS community: it updates earlier surveys, organizes the literature into comparable dimensions, and makes a plausible case that emotion- and value-driven norm emergence is under-represented. The paper's structure is clear, the classification tables are extensive, and the PRISMA flow diagram signals an attempt at methodological transparency. However, the significance of the qualitative findings depends entirely on the reproducibility and consistency of the 39-paper corpus. Because the corpus definition is not reproducible and the synthesis draws on papers outside the declared set, the map of mechanisms and the claimed gap analysis are not currently grounded in the stated methodology.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (1)] The citation relevance criterion in Eq. (1), R = C/(2024 - A), is not reproducible as stated. First, the citation count C has no stated source or retrieval date, so the ratio cannot be recomputed. Second, the formula is undefined for A = 2024 because the denominator is zero; the manuscript then says 2023/2024 papers are 'automatically included', which is a separate ad-hoc rule. Third, the threshold R < 1 is introduced without justification or sensitivity analysis. Since 29 of 83 papers are excluded by this rule, the composition of the final 39-paper corpus, and therefore every downstream frequency and gap claim, depends on an arbitrary and unreported criterion. Please specify the citation source and date, define the rule for 2024 papers, and provide a rationale or robustness check for the threshold.
  2. [Section 3.2 and Table 5 vs. Tables 7, 10, 12] The analysis does not consistently use the 39 selected papers. Reference [190] appears in Table 7, Table 10, Table 12, and Section 3.7.5, yet Table 5, which lists the selected emergent and hybrid works, does not include [190] (it instead lists the closely related [189]). Similarly, [171], [90], and [202] are used as evidence in Sections 3.7.2, 3.7.3, and 3.7.5, but none of them appears in the Table 5 list of the 39 selected studies. If the qualitative synthesis relies on papers outside the PRISMA-selected set, the claimed 'systematic' factor rankings and the novelty statement about emotions and values are not grounded in the stated corpus. Please either align Tables 5 and 12 with the set of papers actually analyzed, or explain explicitly why non-selected sources are used as evidence.
  3. [Section 3.2, search query] The reported search string is not reproducible as printed: the boolean structure is ambiguous and appears to contain unmatched parentheses and quotes: ('Norm emergence' OR 'emergence') OR ('Normative systems") AND ('Artificial Intelligence' OR 'Computing Intelligence' OR 'Agent'). Since the PRISMA claim depends on a repeatable search, please give the exact query as executed in each database, including field restrictions and any truncation or wildcard syntax.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Table 7] The row for [190] has no checkmarks in any norm-type column, even though the paper is discussed in Section 3.7.5 as addressing emotions and values and appears in other classification tables; this is likely an omission and should be corrected.
  2. [Section 3.7.5] The paragraph on emotions in NMAS describes [202] twice in nearly identical terms; please remove the duplicate description.
  3. [Section 2.4.1] The subsection title 'Social typology' appears to be a typo for 'Social topology', which is the term used throughout the text.
  4. [Figure 4] The caption of Figure 4 is in Spanish ('Categorización de las normas en MAS') while the manuscript is written in English; please translate it.
  5. [Table 8] The header of Table 8 contains the typo 'usnig' for 'using'.
  6. [Section 4] The conclusions contain the typos 'Free-scale networks' and 'intenalisation'; both should be corrected to 'scale-free' and 'internalisation'.
  7. [Section 3.2] The phrase 'standards emergence' appears several times where 'norm emergence' is meant, which is confusing in a review about norms; please harmonize the terminology.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the review is a descriptive literature synthesis, and no claim reduces to fitted inputs, self-cited uniqueness theorems, or definitional equations.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are synthesizing claims about a selected corpus: it classifies 39 studies and reports factor frequencies, life-cycle coverage, and gaps such as emotions and values being under-simulated. No quantity is derived from an equation that also defines the conclusion. Equation (1), R = C/(2024 - A), is a corpus-inclusion criterion, not a model or a prediction; it may be arbitrary or hard to reproduce, but it does not make the later qualitative findings equivalent to its own inputs. The novelty assertion in Section 3.1 is a comparative claim against prior surveys [163, 95, 137], not a prediction entailed by the authors' own prior work. Self-citations such as [9], [48], and [184] appear in standard definitional or illustrative contexts and are not load-bearing: removing them would not change the factor synthesis or the gap claims. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The corpus-consistency concerns raised by a skeptical reader, such as [190] appearing in tables and discussion despite not being listed among the 39 selected works, are methodological reproducibility issues, not circularity under the rubric.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new entities or mathematical machinery. Its load-bearing choices are corpus-selection parameters (citation threshold, publication window, automatic recent-paper inclusion) and the assumption that classifications in Tables 5-11 are accurate. These parameters and assumptions determine all qualitative findings, so they are listed explicitly.

free parameters (3)
  • Citation relevance threshold = R < 1
    Equation (1); threshold chosen ad hoc to exclude 29 articles, with no justification or sensitivity test.
  • Publication window start = 2005
    Search restricted to 2005 onwards (Section 3.2), excluding earlier norm emergence literature such as Kittock (1993) and Shoham and Tennenholtz (1992), which are cited elsewhere in the paper.
  • Automatic inclusion of 2023/2024 papers = all, regardless of citation count
    Section 3.2 states recent papers were automatically included, bypassing the citation relevance filter and biasing toward unvalidated recent work.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The PRISMA method, as implemented, yields a representative and comprehensive sample of the norm emergence literature.
    Section 3.2 claims systematic rigor, but the realized sample depends on unresolved query ambiguity, an arbitrary citation threshold, and automatic inclusion of 2023/2024 papers.
  • domain assumption The citation ratio R=C/(2024-A) is a valid measure of article relevance.
    Equation (1); the cutoff R<1 is not justified and the ratio is undefined for A=2024.
  • domain assumption Classification of the 39 works into approaches, norm types, life-cycle phases, and factors is reliable.
    Tables 5-11 assign each work to multiple categories; no coding protocol, inter-rater reliability check, or validation against authors' self-descriptions is reported.
  • domain assumption The databases searched and search terms cover the relevant literature.
    Section 3.2 lists five databases plus hand searching in Google Scholar; coverage of venues such as AAMAS/IJCAI workshops depends on the ambiguous query and on hand-selected additions [74,155].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A systematic review of norm emergence in multi-agent systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XXNIKGUT

@misc{pith2026241210609,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A systematic review of norm emergence in multi-agent systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XXNIKGUT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10609}
}
read the original abstract

Multi-agent systems (MAS) have gained relevance in the field of artificial intelligence by offering tools for modelling complex environments where autonomous agents interact to achieve common or individual goals. In these systems, norms emerge as a fundamental component to regulate the behaviour of agents, promoting cooperation, coordination and conflict resolution. This article presents a systematic review, following the PRISMA method, on the emergence of norms in MAS, exploring the main mechanisms and factors that influence this process. Sociological, structural, emotional and cognitive aspects that facilitate the creation, propagation and reinforcement of norms are addressed. The findings highlight the crucial role of social network topology, as well as the importance of emotions and shared values in the adoption and maintenance of norms. Furthermore, opportunities are identified for future research that more explicitly integrates emotional and ethical dynamics in the design of adaptive normative systems. This work provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on norm emergence in MAS, serving as a basis for advancing the development of more efficient and flexible systems in artificial and real-world contexts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10609 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Categorisation of norms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Factors influencing the social emergence of a norm. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Prisma flowchart. 3.1 Previous surveys The emergence of norms in NMAS has been a topic covered in previous reviews. For example, in [163], the authors conducted a review of the state of the art in NMAS focusing on the treatment of the life cycle of norms. The results of the analysis emphasised the strengths and weaknesses of each of the mechanisms studied and identified the main characteristics when modelling the li… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Categorización de las normas en MAS authors use the concept of assimilation to control the evolution of norms in the system based on the evaluation of costs and benefits by actors. Finally, some proposals present a life cycle that covers a larger number of phases (phas…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Possibility of Artificial Intelligence Becoming a Subject and the Alignment Problem

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Dominant control-based AI alignment falls short for potential AGI subjects; a parenting model drawing on Turing's child machines should foster gradual autonomy and cooperative coexistence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

217 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [190]

    Noe: Norm emergence and robustness based on emotions in multiagent systems

    Sz-Ting Tzeng, Nirav Ajmeri, and Munindar P Singh. Noe: Norm emergence and robustness based on emotions in multiagent systems. InInternational Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institu- tions, Norms, and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems, pages 62–77. Springer, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [189]

    Noe: Norm emergence and robustness based on emotions in multiagent systems

    Hsueh Tzeng et al. Noe: Norm emergence and robustness based on emotions in multiagent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 36(3):112–130, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [171]

    Emergence of norms through social learning

    Sandip Sen and Stéphane Airiau. Emergence of norms through social learning. InIJCAI, volume 1507, page 1512, 2007

    work page 2007

  4. [89]

    Achieving socially optimal outcomes in multiagent systems with reinforcement social learning

    Jianye Hao and Ho-Fung Leung. Achieving socially optimal outcomes in multiagent systems with reinforcement social learning. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 8(3):1–23, 2013

    2013

  5. [90]

    Multiagent reinforcement social learning toward coor- dination in cooperative multiagent systems.ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 9(4):1–20, 2014

    Jianye Hao, Ho-Fung Leung, and Zhong Ming. Multiagent reinforcement social learning toward coor- dination in cooperative multiagent systems.ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 9(4):1–20, 2014

    2014

  6. [202]

    Rout- ledge, 2014

    Christian Von Scheve.Emotion and social structures: the affective foundations of social order. Rout- ledge, 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [1]

    Emergence of norms in interactions with complex rewards.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 37(1):2, 2023

    Dhaminda B Abeywickrama, Nathan Griffiths, Zhou Xu, and Alex Mouzakitis. Emergence of norms in interactions with complex rewards.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 37(1):2, 2023

    2023

  8. [2]

    Robust norm emergence by revealing and reasoning about context: Socially intelligent agents for enhancing privacy

    Nirav Ajmeri, Hui Guo, Pradeep K Murukannaiah, and Munindar P Singh. Robust norm emergence by revealing and reasoning about context: Socially intelligent agents for enhancing privacy. InIJCAI, pages 28–34, 2018

    2018

Show all 217 references
  1. [3]

    Elessar: Ethics in norm- aware agents

    Nirav Ajmeri, Hui Guo, Pradeep K Murukannaiah, and Munindar P Singh. Elessar: Ethics in norm- aware agents. InAAMAS, volume 20, pages 16–24, 2020

    2020

  2. [4]

    The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991

    Icek Ajzen. The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991

    1991

  3. [5]

    Hasan Omar Al-Sakran et al. Intelligent traffic information system based on integration of internet of things and agent technology.International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 6(2):37–43, 2015

    2015

  4. [6]

    Operetta: Organization-oriented development environment

    Huib Aldewereld and Virginia Dignum. Operetta: Organization-oriented development environment. In International Workshop on Languages, Methodologies and Development Tools for Multi-Agent Systems, pages 1–18. Springer, 2010

    2010

  5. [7]

    The complex loop of norm emergence: A simulation model

    Giulia Andrighetto, Marco Campenni, Federico Cecconi, and Rosaria Conte. The complex loop of norm emergence: A simulation model. InSimulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena: The second world congress, pages 19–35. Springer, 2010

    2010

  6. [8]

    Perceived legitimacy of normative expec- tations motivates compliance with social norms when nobody is watching.Frontiers in psychology, 6:1413, 2015

    Giulia Andrighetto, Daniela Grieco, and Luca Tummolini. Perceived legitimacy of normative expec- tations motivates compliance with social norms when nobody is watching.Frontiers in psychology, 6:1413, 2015. 30

    2015

  7. [9]

    Normative emotionalagents: a viewpoint paper.IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 13(3):1254–1273, 2020

    Estefania Argente, ElenaDel Val, DanielPerez-Garcia, and Vicente Botti. Normative emotionalagents: a viewpoint paper.IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 13(3):1254–1273, 2020

    2020

  8. [10]

    Studies of independence and conformity: I

    Solomon E Asch. Studies of independence and conformity: I. a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 70(9):1, 1956

    1956

  9. [11]

    Handling change in normative specifications

    Duangtida Athakravi, Domenico Corapi, Alessandra Russo, Marina De Vos, Julian Padget, and Ken Satoh. Handling change in normative specifications. InDeclarative Agent Languages and Technologies X: 10th International Workshop, DALT 2012, Valencia, Spain, June 4, 2012, Revised Se...

    2012

  10. [12]

    The province of jurisprudence determined, volume 2

    John Austin. The province of jurisprudence determined, volume 2. J. Murray, 1861

  11. [13]

    An evolutionary approach to norms.American political science review, 80(4):1095– 1111, 1986

    Robert Axelrod. An evolutionary approach to norms.American political science review, 80(4):1095– 1111, 1986

    1986

  12. [14]

    Smart city iot platform respecting gdpr privacy and security aspects.IEEE Access, 8:23601–23623, 2020

    Claudio Badii, Pierfrancesco Bellini, Angelo Difino, and Paolo Nesi. Smart city iot platform respecting gdpr privacy and security aspects.IEEE Access, 8:23601–23623, 2020

    2020

  13. [15]

    Norms in mas: definitions and related concepts, 2013

    Tina Balke, Célia da Costa Pereira, Frank Dignum, Emiliano Lorini, Antonino Rotolo, Wamberto Vasconcelos, and Serena Villata. Norms in mas: definitions and related concepts, 2013

    2013

  14. [16]

    Social learning theory.Prentice-Hall google schola, 2:101–123, 1977

    Albert Bandura. Social learning theory.Prentice-Hall google schola, 2:101–123, 1977

    1977

  15. [17]

    Affective interaction: How emotional agents affect users.International journal of human-computer studies, 67(9):755–776, 2009

    Russell Beale and Chris Creed. Affective interaction: How emotional agents affect users.International journal of human-computer studies, 67(9):755–776, 2009

    2009

  16. [18]

    Normative agents for real-world scenarios

    Rahmatollah Beheshti. Normative agents for real-world scenarios. InProceedings of the 2014 interna- tional conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pages 1749–1750, 2014

    2014

  17. [19]

    Cognitive social learners: An architecture for modeling normative behavior

    Rahmatollah Beheshti, Awrad Mohammed Ali, and Gita Sukthankar. Cognitive social learners: An architecture for modeling normative behavior. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 29, 2015

    2015

  18. [20]

    Norms and value based reasoning: justifying compliance and violation

    Trevor Bench-Capon and Sanjay Modgil. Norms and value based reasoning: justifying compliance and violation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25:29–64, 2017

    2017

  19. [21]

    The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms

    Cristina Bicchieri. The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  20. [22]

    The grammar of society

    Cristina Bicchieri. The grammar of society. Technical report, Cambridge University Press, 2006

    2006

  21. [23]

    Norms in the wild: How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms

    Cristina Bicchieri. Norms in the wild: How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms. Oxford University Press, 2016

    2016

  22. [24]

    Do the right thing: but only if others do so.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(2):191–208, 2009

    Cristina Bicchieri and Erte Xiao. Do the right thing: but only if others do so.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(2):191–208, 2009

    2009

  23. [25]

    Bdi and boid argumentation.Proc

    Guido Boella and Leendert van der Torre. Bdi and boid argumentation.Proc. of CMNA, 3, 2003

    2003

  24. [26]

    An architecture of a normative system: counts-as con- ditionals, obligations and permissions

    Guido Boella and Leendert van der Torre. An architecture of a normative system: counts-as con- ditionals, obligations and permissions. In Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 229–231, 2006

    2006

  25. [27]

    Substantive and procedural norms in normative multiagent systems

    Guido Boella and Leendert van Der Torre. Substantive and procedural norms in normative multiagent systems. Journal of Applied Logic, 6(2):152–171, 2008

    2008

  26. [28]

    The jacamo framework.Social coordination frameworks for social technical systems, pages 125–151, 2016

    Olivier Boissier, Jomi F Hübner, and Alessandro Ricci. The jacamo framework.Social coordination frameworks for social technical systems, pages 125–151, 2016

    2016

  27. [29]

    Morgan Kaufmann, 2014

    Alan H Bond and Les Gasser.Readings in distributed artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, 2014. 31

    2014

  28. [30]

    Outline of a Theory of Practice, volume 16

    Pierre Bourdieu. Outline of a Theory of Practice, volume 16. Cambridge University Press, 1977

    1977

  29. [31]

    University of Chicago press, 1988

    Robert Boyd and Peter J Richerson.Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago press, 1988

    1988

  30. [32]

    Modeling the emergence and convergence of norms

    Logan Conrad Brooks, Wayne Iba, and Sandip Sen. Modeling the emergence and convergence of norms. In Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011

    2011

  31. [33]

    Normal= normative? the role of intelligent agents in norm innovation.Mind & Society, 8:153–172, 2009

    Marco Campenní, Giulia Andrighetto, Federico Cecconi, and Rosaria Conte. Normal= normative? the role of intelligent agents in norm innovation.Mind & Society, 8:153–172, 2009

    2009

  32. [34]

    Principles of trust for mas: Cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification

    Cristiano Castelfranchi and Rino Falcone. Principles of trust for mas: Cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. InProceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No. 98EX160), pages 72–79. IEEE, 1998

    1998

  33. [35]

    Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties.American journal of Sociology, 113(3):702–734, 2007

    Damon Centola and Michael Macy. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties.American journal of Sociology, 113(3):702–734, 2007

    2007

  34. [36]

    Emergence of norms in a society of heterogeneous agents influenced by the rules of cellular automata techniques

    P Chakrabarti and J Basu. Emergence of norms in a society of heterogeneous agents influenced by the rules of cellular automata techniques. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE), 2(3):481–486, 2010

    2010

  35. [37]

    Social influence: Compliance and conformity.Annu

    Robert B Cialdini and Noah J Goldstein. Social influence: Compliance and conformity.Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55(1):591–621, 2004

    2004

  36. [38]

    Embedding landmarks and scenes in a computational model of institutions

    Owen Cliffe, Marina De Vos, and Julian Padget. Embedding landmarks and scenes in a computational model of institutions. In International Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems, pages 41–57. Springer, 2007

    2007

  37. [39]

    Positive emotions.Oxford handbook of positive psychology, 2:13–24, 2009

    Michael A Cohn and Barbara L Fredrickson. Positive emotions.Oxford handbook of positive psychology, 2:13–24, 2009

    2009

  38. [40]

    Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation.Judgment and Decision making, 4(1):20–33, 2009

    Edward T Cokely and Colleen M Kelley. Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation.Judgment and Decision making, 4(1):20–33, 2009

    2009

  39. [41]

    Foundations of social theory.(No Title), 1990

    JS Coleman. Foundations of social theory.(No Title), 1990

    1990

  40. [42]

    Oxford University Press, USA, 2014

    Rosaria Conte, Giulia Andrighetto, and Marco Campennl.Minding norms: Mechanisms and dynamics of social order in agent societies. Oxford University Press, USA, 2014

    2014

  41. [43]

    From conventions to prescriptions

    Rosaria Conte and Cristiano Castelfranchi. From conventions to prescriptions. towards an integrated view of norms.Artificial intelligence and Law, 7:323–340, 1999

    1999

  42. [44]

    Garland Science, 1995

    Rosaria Conte, Cristiano Castelfranchi, et al.Cognitive and social action. Garland Science, 1995

    1995

  43. [45]

    Normative design using inductive learning.Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 11(4-5):783–799, 2011

    Domenico Corapi, Alessandra Russo, Marina De Vos, Julian Padget, and Ken Satoh. Normative design using inductive learning.Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 11(4-5):783–799, 2011

    2011

  44. [46]

    Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science.Cognition, 50(1-3):41–77, 1994

    Leda Cosmides and John Tooby. Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science.Cognition, 50(1-3):41–77, 1994

    1994

  45. [47]

    No pizza for you: Value- based plan selection in bdi agents

    Stephen Cranefield, Michael Winikoff, Virginia Dignum, and Frank Dignum. No pizza for you: Value- based plan selection in bdi agents. InIJCAI, pages 178–184, 2017

    2017

  46. [48]

    Open issues for normative multi-agent systems.AI communications, 24(3):233–264, 2011

    Natalia Criado, Estefania Argente, and V Botti. Open issues for normative multi-agent systems.AI communications, 24(3):233–264, 2011

    2011

  47. [49]

    Normative deliberation in graded bdi agents

    Natalia Criado, Estefania Argente, and Vicent Botti. Normative deliberation in graded bdi agents. In Multiagent System Technologies: 8th German Conference, MATES 2010, Leipzig, Germany, September 27-29, 2010. Proceedings 8, pages 52–63. Springer, 2010. 32

    2010

  48. [50]

    A classification of cognitive agents

    Mehdi Dastani and Leendert Van Der Torre. A classification of cognitive agents. InProceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 256–261. Routledge, 2019

    2019

  49. [51]

    Understandingcompliancedifferencesbetween legal and social norms: the case of smoking ban

    FrancienDechesne, VirginiaDignum, andYao-HuaTan. Understandingcompliancedifferencesbetween legal and social norms: the case of smoking ban. In Advanced Agent Technology: AAMAS 2011 Workshops, AMPLE, AOSE, ARMS, DOCM 3 AS, ITMAS, Taipei, Taiwan, May 2-6, 2011. Revised Selected ...

    2011

  50. [52]

    Runtime revision of sanctions in normative multi-agent systems.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 34:1–54, 2020

    Davide Dell’Anna, Mehdi Dastani, and Fabiano Dalpiaz. Runtime revision of sanctions in normative multi-agent systems.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 34:1–54, 2020

    2020

  51. [53]

    Autonomous agents with norms.Artificial intelligence and law, 7:69–79, 1999

    Frank Dignum. Autonomous agents with norms.Artificial intelligence and law, 7:69–79, 1999

    1999

  52. [54]

    Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use AI in a responsible way, volume 2156

    Virginia Dignum. Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use AI in a responsible way, volume 2156. Springer, 2019

    2019

  53. [55]

    A communications-oriented perspective on traffic management systems for smart cities: Challenges and innovative approaches

    Soufiene Djahel, Ronan Doolan, Gabriel-Miro Muntean, and John Murphy. A communications-oriented perspective on traffic management systems for smart cities: Challenges and innovative approaches. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(1):125–151, 2014

    2014

  54. [56]

    Developing goal- oriented normative agents: The nbdi architecture

    Baldoino F dos Santos Neto, Viviane Torres da Silva, and Carlos JP de Lucena. Developing goal- oriented normative agents: The nbdi architecture. InAgents and Artificial Intelligence: Third Inter- national Conference, ICAART 2011, Rome, Italy, January, 28-30, 2011. Revised Sele...

    2011

  55. [57]

    Asymmetric game promotes the emergence of cooperation in dynamic networks

    Jinming Du and Ziren Wu. Asymmetric game promotes the emergence of cooperation in dynamic networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 284:111287, 2024

    2024

  56. [58]

    Durkheim and W.D

    ’E. Durkheim and W.D. Halls. The Division of Labour in Society. Contemporary social theory. Macmillan, 1984

    1984

  57. [59]

    De la division du travail social

    Émile Durkheim. De la division du travail social. F. Alcan, 1922

    1922

  58. [60]

    The civilizing process: sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations, 2000

    Nobert Elias. The civilizing process: sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations, 2000

    2000

  59. [61]

    The cement of society: A study of social order, 1989

    Jon Elster. The cement of society: A study of social order, 1989

    1989

  60. [62]

    Learning to be thoughtless: Social norms and individual computation.Computa- tional economics, 18:9–24, 2001

    Joshua M Epstein. Learning to be thoughtless: Social norms and individual computation.Computa- tional economics, 18:9–24, 2001

    2001

  61. [63]

    Brookings Institution Press, 1996

    Joshua M Epstein and Robert Axtell.Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. Brookings Institution Press, 1996

    1996

  62. [64]

    Social norms and human cooperation.Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(4):185–190, 2004

    Ernst Fehr and Urs Fischbacher. Social norms and human cooperation.Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(4):185–190, 2004

    2004

  63. [65]

    Third-party punishment and social norms.Evolution and human behavior, 25(2):63–87, 2004

    Ernst Fehr and Urs Fischbacher. Third-party punishment and social norms.Evolution and human behavior, 25(2):63–87, 2004

    2004

  64. [66]

    Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity.Journal of economic perspectives, 14(3):159–182, 2000

    Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity.Journal of economic perspectives, 14(3):159–182, 2000

    2000

  65. [67]

    Altruistic punishment in humans.Nature, 415(6868):137–140, 2002

    Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter. Altruistic punishment in humans.Nature, 415(6868):137–140, 2002

    2002

  66. [68]

    International norm dynamics and political change.Interna- tional organization, 52(4):887–917, 1998

    Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. International norm dynamics and political change.Interna- tional organization, 52(4):887–917, 1998

    1998

  67. [69]

    Emotion-based norm enforcement and maintenance in multi-agent systems: foundations and petri net modeling

    Julia Fix, Christian Von Scheve, and Daniel Moldt. Emotion-based norm enforcement and maintenance in multi-agent systems: foundations and petri net modeling. InProceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 105–107, 2006. 33

    2006

  68. [70]

    Oxford University Press, 2015

    Neil Fligstein and Doug McAdam.A theory of fields. Oxford University Press, 2015

    2015

  69. [71]

    Learning influence in complex social networks

    Henry Franks, Nathan Griffiths, and Sarabjot Singh Anand. Learning influence in complex social networks. InProceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pages 447–454, 2013

    2013

  70. [72]

    Manipulating convention emergence using in- fluencer agents

    Henry Franks, Nathan Griffiths, and Arshad Jhumka. Manipulating convention emergence using in- fluencer agents. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 26:315–353, 2013

    2013

  71. [73]

    Modeling norm dynamics in multiagent systems.FLAP, 5(2):491–564, 2018

    Christopher Frantz and Gabriella Pigozzi. Modeling norm dynamics in multiagent systems.FLAP, 5(2):491–564, 2018

    2018

  72. [74]

    Modelling dynamic normative understanding in agent societies

    Christopher K Frantz, Martin K Purvis, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, and Mariusz Nowostawski. Modelling dynamic normative understanding in agent societies. In PRIMA 2014: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems: 17th International Conference, Gold Coast, QLD Australia, D...

    2014

  73. [75]

    Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification.Social Networks, 1(3):215– 239, 1978

    Linton C Freeman. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification.Social Networks, 1(3):215– 239, 1978

    1978

  74. [76]

    Norm- orientedprogrammingofelectronicinstitutions

    Andrés García-Camino, J-A Rodríguez-Aguilar, Carles Sierra, and Wamberto Vasconcelos. Norm- orientedprogrammingofelectronicinstitutions. In Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 670–672, 2006

    2006

  75. [77]

    Con- straint rule-based programming of norms for electronic institutions.Autonomous agents and multi- agent systems, 18:186–217, 2009

    Andres Garcia-Camino, Juan A Rodriguez-Aguilar, Carles Sierra, and Wamberto Vasconcelos. Con- straint rule-based programming of norms for electronic institutions.Autonomous agents and multi- agent systems, 18:186–217, 2009

    2009

  76. [78]

    Norm dynamics: Interdisciplinary perspectives on social norm emergence, persistence, and change.Annual Review of Psychology, 75(1):341–378, 2024

    Michele J Gelfand, Sergey Gavrilets, and Nathan Nunn. Norm dynamics: Interdisciplinary perspectives on social norm emergence, persistence, and change.Annual Review of Psychology, 75(1):341–378, 2024

    2024

  77. [79]

    Self-organization in the commons: An empirically-tested model.Environmental Modelling & Software, 96:30–45, 2017

    Amineh Ghorbani, Giangiacomo Bravo, Ulrich Frey, and Insa Theesfeld. Self-organization in the commons: An empirically-tested model.Environmental Modelling & Software, 96:30–45, 2017

    2017

  78. [80]

    Norms: The problem of definition and classification.American Journal of Sociology, 70(5):586–594, 1965

    Jack P Gibbs. Norms: The problem of definition and classification.American Journal of Sociology, 70(5):586–594, 1965

    1965

  79. [81]

    The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration.Polity, 1984

    Anthony Giddens. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration.Polity, 1984

    1984

  80. [82]

    The strength of weak ties.American journal of sociology, 78(6):1360–1380, 1973

    Mark S Granovetter. The strength of weak ties.American journal of sociology, 78(6):1360–1380, 1973

    1973

  81. [83]

    Evaluating a computational model of emotion.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 11:23–43, 2005

    Jonathan Gratch and Stacy Marsella. Evaluating a computational model of emotion.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 11:23–43, 2005

    2005

  82. [84]

    Consensus and informationcascadesingame-theoreticimitationdynamicswithstaticanddynamicnetworktopologies

    Christopher Griffin, Sarah Rajtmajer, Anna Squicciarini, and Andrew Belmonte. Consensus and informationcascadesingame-theoreticimitationdynamicswithstaticanddynamicnetworktopologies. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 18(2):597–628, 2019

    2019

  83. [85]

    Nathan Griffiths and Michael M. Luck. Norm emergence in tag-based cooperation. In8th European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS), Paris, France, 2010. Unpublished

    2010

  84. [86]

    The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society, volume 1

    Jürgen Habermas. The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society, volume 1. Beacon press, 1985

    1985

  85. [87]

    The moral emotions.Handbook of affective sciences, 11(2003):852–870, 2003

    Jonathan Haidt et al. The moral emotions.Handbook of affective sciences, 11(2003):852–870, 2003

    2003

  86. [88]

    The dynamics of reinforcement social learn- ing in networked cooperative multiagent systems.Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 58:111–122, 2017

    Jianye Hao, Dongping Huang, Yi Cai, and Ho-fung Leung. The dynamics of reinforcement social learn- ing in networked cooperative multiagent systems.Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 58:111–122, 2017. 34

    2017

  87. [91]

    Efficient and robust emergence of norms through heuristic collective learning

    Jianye Hao, Jun Sun, Guangyong Chen, Zan Wang, Chao Yu, and Zhong Ming. Efficient and robust emergence of norms through heuristic collective learning. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 12(4):1–20, 2017

    2017

  88. [92]

    Heuristic collective learning for efficient and robust emergence of social norms, 2015

    Jianye Hao, Jun Sun, Dongping Huang, Yi Cai, and Chao Yu. Heuristic collective learning for efficient and robust emergence of social norms, 2015. Disponible en:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_ research/4948

    2015

  89. [93]

    oxford university press, 2012

    Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart and Leslie Green.The concept of law. oxford university press, 2012

    2012

  90. [94]

    Dynamics of effort allocation and evolution of trust: an agent-based model.Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 20:133–154, 2014

    Behrooz Hassani-Mahmooei and Brett W Parris. Dynamics of effort allocation and evolution of trust: an agent-based model.Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 20:133–154, 2014

    2014

  91. [95]

    Engineering the emergence of norms: a review.The Knowledge Engineering Review, 32:e18, 2017

    Chris Haynes, Michael Luck, Peter McBurney, Samhar Mahmoud, Tomáš Vítek, and Simon Miles. Engineering the emergence of norms: a review.The Knowledge Engineering Review, 32:e18, 2017

    2017

  92. [96]

    Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas.Journal of theoretical biology, 208(1):79– 89, 2001

    Joseph Henrich and Robert Boyd. Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas.Journal of theoretical biology, 208(1):79– 89, 2001

    2001

  93. [97]

    The efficacy of targeted sanctions in enforcing compliance with international law

    Alexandra Hofer. The efficacy of targeted sanctions in enforcing compliance with international law. AJIL Unbound, 2019

    2019

  94. [98]

    OUP Oxford, 2000

    John H Holland.Emergence: From chaos to order. OUP Oxford, 2000

    2000

  95. [99]

    Thecurrentstateofnormativeagent-basedsystems

    ChristopherDHollanderandAnnieSWu. Thecurrentstateofnormativeagent-basedsystems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 14(2):6, 2011

    2011

  96. [100]

    Using the process of norm emergence to model consensus formation

    Christopher D Hollander and Annie S Wu. Using the process of norm emergence to model consensus formation. In2011 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, pages 148–157. IEEE, 2011

    2011

  97. [101]

    Achieving coordination in multi-agent systems by stable local conven- tions under community networks

    Shuyue Hu and Ho-fung Leung. Achieving coordination in multi-agent systems by stable local conven- tions under community networks. InIjcai, pages 4731–4737, 2017

    2017

  98. [102]

    A normative organisation programming language for organisation management infrastructures

    Jomi F Hübner, Olivier Boissier, and Rafael H Bordini. A normative organisation programming language for organisation management infrastructures. InInternational Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems, pages 114–129. Springer, 2009

    2009

  99. [103]

    Cognition in the wild

    Edwin Hutchins. Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, 1995

    1995

  100. [104]

    Social and economic networks, 2008

    MO Jackson. Social and economic networks, 2008

    2008

  101. [105]

    Handbook of philosophical logic, chapter deontic logic and contrary-to-duties, 2001

    A Jones and J Carmo. Handbook of philosophical logic, chapter deontic logic and contrary-to-duties, 2001

    2001

  102. [106]

    On the characterisation of law and computer systems: The normative systems perspective

    Andrew JI Jones, Marek Sergot, et al. On the characterisation of law and computer systems: The normative systems perspective. Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification, pages 275–307, 1993

    1993

  103. [107]

    Thinking, fast and slow.Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011

    Daniel Kahneman. Thinking, fast and slow.Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. 35

    2011

  104. [108]

    Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk

    Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. InHandbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, pages 99–127. World Scientific, 2013

    2013

  105. [109]

    Harper & Row., 1964

    Immanuel Kant.Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: translated by HJ Paton. Harper & Row., 1964

    1964

  106. [110]

    Automatic resolution of normative conflicts in supportive technology based on user values.ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 18(4):1–21, 2018

    Alex Kayal, Willem-Paul Brinkman, Mark A Neerincx, and M Birna Van Riemsdijk. Automatic resolution of normative conflicts in supportive technology based on user values.ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 18(4):1–21, 2018

    2018

  107. [111]

    Emergent conventions and the structure of multi-agent systems

    James E Kittock. Emergent conventions and the structure of multi-agent systems. InProceedings of the 1993 Santa Fe Institute Complex Systems Summer School, volume 6, pages 1–14. Citeseer, 1993

    1993

  108. [112]

    N-jason: Run- time norm compliance in agentspeak (l)

    JeeHang Lee, Julian Padget, Brian Logan, Daniela Dybalova, and Natasha Alechina. N-jason: Run- time norm compliance in agentspeak (l). InEngineering Multi-Agent Systems: Second International Workshop, EMAS 2014, Paris, France, May 5-6, 2014, Revised Selected Papers 2, pages 36...

    2014

  109. [113]

    Emotion and decision making

    Jennifer S Lerner, Ye Li, Piercarlo Valdesolo, and Karim S Kassam. Emotion and decision making. Annual review of psychology, 66(1):799–823, 2015

    2015

  110. [114]

    Convention emergence with congested resources

    Priel Levy and Nathan Griffiths. Convention emergence with congested resources. SN Computer Science, 4(3):282, 2023

    2023

  111. [115]

    Convention: A philosophical study

    David Lewis. Convention: A philosophical study. John Wiley & Sons, 2008

    2008

  112. [116]

    From local to global norm emergence: dissolving self-reinforcing substructures with incremental social instruments

    Yiwei Liu, Jiamou Liu, Kaibin Wan, Zhan Qin, Zijian Zhang, Bakhadyr Khoussainov, and Liehuang Zhu. From local to global norm emergence: dissolving self-reinforcing substructures with incremental social instruments. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 6871–688...

    2021

  113. [117]

    Simulatingtheemergenceofnormsindifferent scenarios

    UlfLotzmann, MichaelMöhring, andKlausGTroitzsch. Simulatingtheemergenceofnormsindifferent scenarios. Artificial intelligence and law, 21:109–138, 2013

    2013

  114. [118]

    Signals of belonging: emergence of signalling norms as facilitators of trust and parochial cooperation.Philosophical Trans- actions of the Royal Society B, 379(1897):20230029, 2024

    Ana Macanovic, Milena Tsvetkova, Wojtek Przepiorka, and Vincent Buskens. Signals of belonging: emergence of signalling norms as facilitators of trust and parochial cooperation.Philosophical Trans- actions of the Royal Society B, 379(1897):20230029, 2024

    2024

  115. [119]

    University of Notre Dame Pess, 2007

    Alasdair MacIntyre.After virtue: A study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Pess, 2007

    2007

  116. [120]

    A normative approach for resilient multiagent systems.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 37(2):46, 2023

    Geeta Mahala, Özgür Kafalı, Hoa Dam, Aditya Ghose, and Munindar P Singh. A normative approach for resilient multiagent systems.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 37(2):46, 2023

    2023

  117. [121]

    A review of norms and normative multiagent systems.The Scientific World Journal, 2014(1):684587, 2014

    Moamin A Mahmoud, Mohd Sharifuddin Ahmad, Mohd Zaliman Mohd Yusoff, and Aida Mustapha. A review of norms and normative multiagent systems.The Scientific World Journal, 2014(1):684587, 2014

    2014

  118. [122]

    Information-based incentivisation when rewards are inadequate

    Samhar Mahmoud, Lina Barakat, Simon Miles, Adel Taweel, Brendan Delaney, and Michael Luck. Information-based incentivisation when rewards are inadequate. InECAI 2014, pages 591–596. IOS Press, 2014

    2014

  119. [123]

    Efficient norm emergence through experiential dynamic punishment

    Samhar Mahmoud, Nathan Griffiths, Jeroen Keppens, and Michael Luck. Efficient norm emergence through experiential dynamic punishment. InECAI 2012, pages 576–581. IOS Press, 2012

    2012

  120. [124]

    Establishing norms with metanorms over interaction topologies.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 31:1344–1376, 2017

    Samhar Mahmoud, Nathan Griffiths, Jeroen Keppens, and Michael Luck. Establishing norms with metanorms over interaction topologies.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 31:1344–1376, 2017

    2017

  121. [125]

    Establishing norms with metanorms in distributed computational systems.Artificial Intelligence and Law, 23:367–407, 2015

    Samhar Mahmoud, Nathan Griffiths, Jeroen Keppens, Adel Taweel, Trevor JM Bench-Capon, and Michael Luck. Establishing norms with metanorms in distributed computational systems.Artificial Intelligence and Law, 23:367–407, 2015. 36

    2015

  122. [126]

    Cooperationemergenceunderresource-constrained peer punishment

    SamharMahmoud, SimonMiles, andMichaelLuck. Cooperationemergenceunderresource-constrained peer punishment. InAAMAS, pages 900–908, 2016

    2016

  123. [127]

    Norm estab- lishment constrained by limited resources.Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Au- tonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2015), 2015

    Samhar Mahmoud, Simon Miles, Adel Taweel, Brendan Delaney, and Michael Luck. Norm estab- lishment constrained by limited resources.Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Au- tonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2015), 2015

    2015

  124. [128]

    Cambridge University Press, 2009

    James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen.Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press, 2009

    2009

  125. [129]

    Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation

    Hazel Rose Markus and Shinobu Kitayama. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. InCollege student development and academic life, pages 264–293. Routledge, 2014

    2014

  126. [130]

    Prosocial norm emergence in multi-agent systems.ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 17(1-2):1–24, 2022

    Mehdi Mashayekhi, Nirav Ajmeri, George F List, and Munindar P Singh. Prosocial norm emergence in multi-agent systems.ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 17(1-2):1–24, 2022

    2022

  127. [131]

    Silk: A simulation study of regulating open normative multiagent systems

    Mehdi Mashayekhi, Hongying Du, George F List, and Munindar P Singh. Silk: A simulation study of regulating open normative multiagent systems. InIJCAI, pages 373–379, 2016

    2016

  128. [132]

    Anticipated emotions as guides to choice.Current directions in psychological science, 10(6):210–214, 2001

    Barbara A Mellers and A Peter McGraw. Anticipated emotions as guides to choice.Current directions in psychological science, 10(6):210–214, 2001

    2001

  129. [133]

    The value of values and norms in social simulation

    Rijk Mercuur, Virginia Dignum, and Catholijn Jonker. The value of values and norms in social simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 22(1), 2019

    2019

  130. [134]

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement.Annals of internal medicine, 151(4):264–269, 2009

    David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman, and t PRISMA Group*. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement.Annals of internal medicine, 151(4):264–269, 2009

    2009

  131. [135]

    Bases neurales de la aversión a las pérdidas en contextos económicos: revisión sistemática según las directrices prisma

    Francisco Molins and Miguel A Serrano. Bases neurales de la aversión a las pérdidas en contextos económicos: revisión sistemática según las directrices prisma. Revista de Neurología, 68(2):47–58, 2019

    2019

  132. [136]

    Off-line synthesis of evolutionarily stable normative systems

    Javier Morales, Michael Wooldridge, Juan A Rodríguez-Aguilar, and Maite López-Sánchez. Off-line synthesis of evolutionarily stable normative systems. Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, 32:635–671, 2018

    2018

  133. [137]

    Norm emergence in multiagent systems: a viewpoint paper.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 33:706–749, 2019

    Andreasa Morris-Martin, Marina De Vos, and Julian Padget. Norm emergence in multiagent systems: a viewpoint paper.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 33:706–749, 2019

    2019

  134. [138]

    A norm emergence framework for nor- mative mas–position paper

    Andreasa Morris-Martin, Marina De Vos, and Julian Padget. A norm emergence framework for nor- mative mas–position paper. InCoordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms, and Ethics for Gov- ernance of Multi-Agent Systems XIII: International Workshops COIN 2017 and COINE 202...

    2017

  135. [139]

    Elvira: An explainable agent for value and utility-driven multiuser privacy

    Francesca Mosca and Jose M Such. Elvira: An explainable agent for value and utility-driven multiuser privacy. InAAMAS, pages 916–924, 2021

    2021

  136. [140]

    Emergence of norms with biased interactions in heterogeneous agent societies

    Partha Mukherjee, Sandip Sen, and Stephane Airiau. Emergence of norms with biased interactions in heterogeneous agent societies. In2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intel- ligence and Intelligent Agent Technology-Workshops, pages 512–515. IEEE, 2007

    2007

  137. [141]

    Norm emergence in spatially constrained inter- actions

    Partha Mukherjee, Sandip Sen, and Stéphane Airiau. Norm emergence in spatially constrained inter- actions. InWorking Notes of the Adaptive and Learning Agents Workshop at AAMAS, volume 7, pages 2–6, 2007

    2007

  138. [142]

    Norm emergence under constrained interactions in diverse societies

    Partha Mukherjee, Sandip Sen, and Stéphane Airiau. Norm emergence under constrained interactions in diverse societies. InAAMAS (2), pages 779–786, 2008. 37

    2008

  139. [143]

    When rules really make a difference: The effect of cooperation rules and self-sacrificing leadership on moral norms in social dilemmas.Journal of Business Ethics, 95:57–72, 2010

    Laetitia B Mulder and Rob MA Nelissen. When rules really make a difference: The effect of cooperation rules and self-sacrificing leadership on moral norms in social dilemmas.Journal of Business Ethics, 95:57–72, 2010

    2010

  140. [144]

    The influence of random interactions and decision heuristicsonnormevolutioninsocialnetworks

    Declan Mungovan, Enda Howley, and Jim Duggan. The influence of random interactions and decision heuristicsonnormevolutioninsocialnetworks. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 17:152–178, 2011

    2011

  141. [145]

    The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.bmj, 372, 2021

    Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C Hoffmann, Cynthia D Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M Tetzlaff, Elie A Akl, Sue E Brennan, et al. The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.bmj, 372, 2021

    2020

  142. [146]

    Affective forecasting and self- control: Why anticipating pride wins over anticipating shame in a self-regulation context.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3):537–545, 2009

    Vanessa M Patrick, HaeEun Helen Chun, and Deborah J MacInnis. Affective forecasting and self- control: Why anticipating pride wins over anticipating shame in a self-regulation context.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3):537–545, 2009

    2009

  143. [147]

    Fostering cooperation through dynamic coalition formation and partner switching.ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 9(1):1–31, 2014

    Ana Peleteiro, Juan C Burguillo, Josep Ll Arcos, and Juan A Rodriguez-Aguilar. Fostering cooperation through dynamic coalition formation and partner switching.ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 9(1):1–31, 2014

    2014

  144. [148]

    An extended agent bdi model with norms, policies and contracts

    Yan-Bin Peng, Ji Gao, Jie-Qin Ai, Cun-Hao Wang, and Hang Guo. An extended agent bdi model with norms, policies and contracts. In 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, pages 1–4. IEEE, 2008

    2008

  145. [149]

    The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour

    Marco Perugini and Richard P Bagozzi. The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British journal of social psychology, 40(1):79–98, 2001

    2001

  146. [150]

    Piaget’s theory, 1976

    Jean Piaget. Piaget’s theory, 1976

    1976

  147. [151]

    Aninformation-theoreticprimeroncomplexity, self-organization, and emergence.Complexity, 15(1):11–28, 2009

    MikhailProkopenko, FabioBoschetti, andAlexJRyan. Aninformation-theoreticprimeroncomplexity, self-organization, and emergence.Complexity, 15(1):11–28, 2009

    2009

  148. [152]

    Structure in artificial societies.PhDthesis, Software Department, Universitat Politénica deCatalunya, 2006

    Josep M Pujol. Structure in artificial societies.PhDthesis, Software Department, Universitat Politénica deCatalunya, 2006

    2006

  149. [153]

    A theory of justice

    John Rawls. A theory of justice. cambridge (mass.): Harvard university press. RawlsA Theory of Justice, 1971

    1971

  150. [154]

    Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate r&d teams.Organization science, 12(4):502–517, 2001

    Ray Reagans and Ezra W Zuckerman. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate r&d teams.Organization science, 12(4):502–517, 2001

    2001

  151. [155]

    Emergence of social norms in large language model-based agent societies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08251, 2024

    Siyue Ren, Zhiyao Cui, Ruiqi Song, Zhen Wang, and Shuyue Hu. Emergence of social norms in large language model-based agent societies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08251, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  152. [156]

    How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior.Communication research, 32(3):389–414, 2005

    Rajiv N Rimal and Kevin Real. How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior.Communication research, 32(3):389–414, 2005

    2005

  153. [157]

    Probabilistic rule-based argumentation for norm-governed learning agents.Artificial intelligence and Law, 20:383–420, 2012

    Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo, and Giovanni Sartor. Probabilistic rule-based argumentation for norm-governed learning agents.Artificial intelligence and Law, 20:383–420, 2012

    2012

  154. [158]

    Diffusion of innovations, 1962

    Everett Rogers. Diffusion of innovations, 1962

    1962

  155. [159]

    Losderechoscomoobjetodeanálisis: entrelafilosofíaylasociología

    FranciscoJavierAnsuáteguiRoig. Losderechoscomoobjetodeanálisis: entrelafilosofíaylasociología. Teoría & Derecho. Revista de pensamiento jurídico, (29):186–211, 2021

    2021

  156. [160]

    Pearson, 2016

    Stuart J Russell and Peter Norvig.Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Pearson, 2016. 38

    2016

  157. [161]

    Aspects of active norm learning and the effect of lying on norm emergence in agent societies

    Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Rexy Arulanandam, and Maryam Purvis. Aspects of active norm learning and the effect of lying on norm emergence in agent societies. InAgents in Principle, Agents in Practice: 14th International Conference, PRIMA 2011, Wollongong, Australia, November 16-18,

    2011

  158. [162]

    Emergenceofasharing norm in a simulated hunter-gatherer society

    BastinTonyRoySavarimuthu, RexyArulanandam, andSharmilaSavarimuthu. Emergenceofasharing norm in a simulated hunter-gatherer society. In2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, volume 2, pages 34–37. IEEE, 2011

    2011

  159. [163]

    Norm creation, spreading and emergence: A survey of simulation models of norms in multi-agent systems.Multiagent and Grid Systems, 7(1):21–54, 2011

    Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu and Stephen Cranefield. Norm creation, spreading and emergence: A survey of simulation models of norms in multi-agent systems.Multiagent and Grid Systems, 7(1):21–54, 2011

    2011

  160. [164]

    Norm emergence in agent societies formed by dynamically changing networks.Web Intelligence and Agent Systems: An International Journal, 7(3):223–232, 2009

    Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Stephen Cranefield, Martin K Purvis, and Maryam A Purvis. Norm emergence in agent societies formed by dynamically changing networks.Web Intelligence and Agent Systems: An International Journal, 7(3):223–232, 2009

    2009

  161. [165]

    Role model based mechanism for norm emergence in artificial agent societies

    Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Stephen Cranefield, Maryam Purvis, and Martin Purvis. Role model based mechanism for norm emergence in artificial agent societies. InInternational Workshop on Co- ordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems, pages 203–217. S...

    2007

  162. [166]

    Norm identification in multi-agent societies

    Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Stephen Cranefield, Maryam A Purvis, and Martin K Purvis. Norm identification in multi-agent societies. 2010

    2010

  163. [167]

    Obligation norm identification in agent societies.Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 13(4):3, 2010

    BastinTonyRoySavarimuthu, StephenCranefield, MaryamAPurvis, andMartinKPurvis. Obligation norm identification in agent societies.Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 13(4):3, 2010

    2010

  164. [168]

    Mechanisms for norm emergence in multiagent societies

    Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Maryam Purvis, Stephen Cranefield, and Martin Purvis. Mechanisms for norm emergence in multiagent societies. InProceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 1–3, 2007

    2007

  165. [169]

    Social norm emergence in virtual agent societies

    Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Maryam Purvis, Martin Purvis, and Stephen Cranefield. Social norm emergence in virtual agent societies. InDeclarative Agent Languages and Technologies VI: 6th Inter- national Workshop, DALT 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 12, 2008, Revised Selected an...

    2008

  166. [170]

    Effects of social network topology and options on norm emergence

    Onkur Sen and Sandip Sen. Effects of social network topology and options on norm emergence. In International Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems, pages 211–222. Springer, 2009

    2009

  167. [172]

    Exploiting moral values to choose the right norms

    Marc Serramia, Maite López-Sánchez, Juan A Rodríguez-Aguilar, Javier Morales, Michael Wooldridge, and Carlos Ansotegui. Exploiting moral values to choose the right norms. InProceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 264–270, 2018

    2018

  168. [173]

    Moral values in norm decision making

    Marc Serramia, Maite Lopez-Sanchez, Juan A Rodriguez-Aguilar, Manel Rodriguez, Michael Wooldridge, Javier Morales, and Carlos Ansotegui. Moral values in norm decision making. 2018

    2018

  169. [174]

    Norm emergence via influential weight propagation in complex networks

    Ryosuke Shibusawa and Toshiharu Sugawara. Norm emergence via influential weight propagation in complex networks. In2014 European Network Intelligence Conference, pages 30–37. IEEE, 2014

    2014

  170. [175]

    Emergent conventions in multi-agent systems: initial ex- perimental results and observations (preliminary report)

    Yoav Shoham and Moshe Tennenholtz. Emergent conventions in multi-agent systems: initial ex- perimental results and observations (preliminary report). InProceedings of the Third International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 225–231, 1992

    1992

  171. [176]

    Norms and conventions.Philosophical Explorations, 14(2):195– 217, 2011

    Nicholas Southwood and Lina Eriksson. Norms and conventions.Philosophical Explorations, 14(2):195– 217, 2011. 39

    2011

  172. [177]

    Introducing emotions into the computational study of social norms: A first evaluation.Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 4(1):U27–U60, 2001

    Alexander Staller, Paolo Petta, et al. Introducing emotions into the computational study of social norms: A first evaluation.Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 4(1):U27–U60, 2001

    2001

  173. [178]

    The mediating role of anticipated guilt in consumers’ ethical decision-making

    Sarah Steenhaut and Patrick Van Kenhove. The mediating role of anticipated guilt in consumers’ ethical decision-making. Journal of business ethics, 69:269–288, 2006

    2006

  174. [179]

    Multiagent systems: A survey from a machine learning perspective

    Peter Stone and Manuela Veloso. Multiagent systems: A survey from a machine learning perspective. Autonomous Robots, 8:345–383, 2000

    2000

  175. [180]

    A model of norm emergence and innovation in language change

    Samarth Swarup, Andrea Apolloni, and Zsuzsanna Fagyal. A model of norm emergence and innovation in language change. InAAMAS, pages 693–700, 2011

    2011

  176. [181]

    Understanding the role of values and norms in practical reasoning

    Jazon Szabo, Jose M Such, and Natalia Criado. Understanding the role of values and norms in practical reasoning. In European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 431–439. Springer, 2020

    2020

  177. [182]

    Evidence from a long-term experiment that collective risks change social norms and promote cooperation.Nature communications, 12(1):5452, 2021

    Aron Szekely, Francesca Lipari, Alberto Antonioni, Mario Paolucci, Angel Sánchez, Luca Tummolini, and Giulia Andrighetto. Evidence from a long-term experiment that collective risks change social norms and promote cooperation.Nature communications, 12(1):5452, 2021

    2021

  178. [183]

    Moral emotions and moral behavior.Annu

    June Price Tangney, Jeff Stuewig, and Debra J Mashek. Moral emotions and moral behavior.Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58(1):345–372, 2007

    2007

  179. [184]

    PhD thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València, 2017

    Joaquín José Taverner Aparicio.Gestión de la personalidad en la arquitectura de agentes emocionales GenIA3. PhD thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València, 2017

    2017

  180. [185]

    Cultural learning

    Michael Tomasello, Ann Cale Kruger, and Hilary Horn Ratner. Cultural learning. Behavioral and brain sciences, 16(3):495–511, 1993

    1993

  181. [186]

    Norm-focused nudges influence pro-environmental choices and moderate post-choice emotional responses.Plos one, 16(3):e0247519, 2021

    Carlos Andres Trujillo, Catalina Estrada-Mejia, and Jose A Rosa. Norm-focused nudges influence pro-environmental choices and moderate post-choice emotional responses.Plos one, 16(3):e0247519, 2021

    2021

  182. [187]

    The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social notions, 1995

    R Tuomela. The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social notions, 1995

    1995

  183. [188]

    Princeton university press, 2006

    Tom R Tyler.Why people obey the law. Princeton university press, 2006

    2006

  184. [191]

    Fleur: Social values orientation for robust norm emergence

    Sz-Ting Tzeng, Nirav Ajmeri, and Munindar P Singh. Fleur: Social values orientation for robust norm emergence. In International Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms, and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems, pages 185–200. Springer, 2022

    2022

  185. [192]

    Socialnetworkthresholdsinthediffusionofinnovations

    ThomasWValente. Socialnetworkthresholdsinthediffusionofinnovations. Social networks, 18(1):69– 89, 1996

    1996

  186. [193]

    Emotionsasagentsofsocialinfluence: Insightsfromemotionsassocialinformation theory

    GerbenAvanKleef. Emotionsasagentsofsocialinfluence: Insightsfromemotionsassocialinformation theory. The Oxford handbook of social influence, pages 237–255, 2017

    2017

  187. [194]

    An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model

    Gerben A Van Kleef, Carsten KW De Dreu, and Antony SR Manstead. An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. In Advances in experimental social psychology, volume 42, pages 45–96. Elsevier, 2010

    2010

  188. [195]

    The persuasive power of emotions: Effects of emotional expressions on attitude formation and change.Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4):1124, 2015

    Gerben A Van Kleef, Helma Van den Berg, and Marc W Heerdink. The persuasive power of emotions: Effects of emotional expressions on attitude formation and change.Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4):1124, 2015. 40

    2015

  189. [196]

    PhD thesis, Stockholm Universitet, 2000

    Henricus JE Verhagen.Norm autonomous agents. PhD thesis, Stockholm Universitet, 2000

    2000

  190. [197]

    Towards an adaptive and normative multi-agent system metamodel and language: Existing approaches and research opportunities

    Marx Viana, Paulo Alencar, and Carlos Lucena. Towards an adaptive and normative multi-agent system metamodel and language: Existing approaches and research opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13084, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  191. [198]

    Dynamic sanctioning for robust and cost-efficient norm compliance

    Daniel Villatoro, Giulia Andrighetto, Jordi Sabater-Mir, and Rosaria Conte. Dynamic sanctioning for robust and cost-efficient norm compliance. InIJCAI, volume 11, pages 414–419, 2011

    2011

  192. [199]

    Social instruments for robust convention emer- gence

    Daniel Villatoro, Jordi Sabater-Mir, and Sandip Sen. Social instruments for robust convention emer- gence. In IJCAI, volume 11, pages 420–425. Citeseer, 2011

    2011

  193. [200]

    Robust convention emergence in social networks through self-reinforcing structures dissolution.ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Sys- tems (TAAS), 8(1):1–21, 2013

    Daniel Villatoro, Jordi Sabater-Mir, and Sandip Sen. Robust convention emergence in social networks through self-reinforcing structures dissolution.ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Sys- tems (TAAS), 8(1):1–21, 2013

    2013

  194. [201]

    Topology and memory effect on convention emer- gence

    Daniel Villatoro, Sandip Sen, and Jordi Sabater-Mir. Topology and memory effect on convention emer- gence. In 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, volume 2, pages 233–240. IEEE, 2009

    2009

  195. [203]

    My agents love to conform: Norms and emotion in the micro-macro link.Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 12:81–100, 2006

    Christian von Scheve, Daniel Moldt, Julia Fix, and Rolf von Luede. My agents love to conform: Norms and emotion in the micro-macro link.Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 12:81–100, 2006

    2006

  196. [204]

    Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks

    Duncan J Watts and Steven H Strogatz. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. nature, 393(6684):440–442, 1998

    1998

  197. [205]

    Contestation and constitution of norms in global international relations

    Antje Wiener. Contestation and constitution of norms in global international relations. Cambridge University Press, 2018

    2018

  198. [206]

    Applications of deontic logic in computer science: A concise overview

    Roel J Wieringa and John-Jules Ch Meyer. Applications of deontic logic in computer science: A concise overview. Deontic logic in computer science, pages 17–40, 1993

    1993

  199. [207]

    Wilkinson and K

    R. Wilkinson and K. Pickett. The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger. Bloomsbury USA, 2010

    2010

  200. [208]

    Why bad coffee? explaining bdi agent behaviour with valuings.Artificial Intelligence, 300:103554, 2021

    Michael Winikoff, Galina Sidorenko, Virginia Dignum, and Frank Dignum. Why bad coffee? explaining bdi agent behaviour with valuings.Artificial Intelligence, 300:103554, 2021

    2021

  201. [209]

    John wiley & sons, 2009

    Michael Wooldridge.An introduction to multiagent systems. John wiley & sons, 2009

    2009

  202. [210]

    Accelerating norm emergence through hierarchical heuristic learning

    Tianpei Yang, Zhaopeng Meng, Jianye Hao, Sandip Sen, and Chao Yu. Accelerating norm emergence through hierarchical heuristic learning. InECAI 2016, pages 1344–1352. IOS Press, 2016

    2016

  203. [211]

    Hierarchical learning for emergence of social norms in networked multiagent systems

    Chao Yu, Hongtao Lv, Fenghui Ren, Honglin Bao, and Jianye Hao. Hierarchical learning for emergence of social norms in networked multiagent systems. InAI 2015: Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 28th Australasian Joint Conference, Canberra, ACT, Australia, November 30–Decembe...

    2015

  204. [212]

    An adaptive learning framework for efficient emergence of social norms

    Chao Yu, Hongtao Lv, Sandip Sen, Jianye Hao, Fenghui Ren, and Rui Liu. An adaptive learning framework for efficient emergence of social norms. InAAMAS, pages 1307–1308, 2016

    2016

  205. [213]

    Collective learning and information diffusion for efficient emergence of social norms

    Chao Yu, Zhen Wang, Hongtao Lv, Honglin Bao, and Yapeng Li. Collective learning and information diffusion for efficient emergence of social norms. InMulti-agent and Complex Systems, pages 193–210. Springer, 2017

    2017

  206. [214]

    Collective learning for the emergence of social norms in networked multiagent systems.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44(12):2342–2355, 2014

    Chao Yu, Minjie Zhang, and Fenghui Ren. Collective learning for the emergence of social norms in networked multiagent systems.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44(12):2342–2355, 2014. 41

    2014

  207. [215]

    Emergence of social norms through col- lective learning in networked agent societies

    Chao Yu, Minjie Zhang, Fenghui Ren, and Xudong Luo. Emergence of social norms through col- lective learning in networked agent societies. InProceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pages 475–482, 2013

    2013

  208. [216]

    How we learn social norms: a three-stage model for social norm learning.Frontiers in Psychology, 14:1153809, 2023

    Wen Zhang, Yunhan Liu, Yixuan Dong, Wanna He, Shiming Yao, Ziqian Xu, and Yan Mu. How we learn social norms: a three-stage model for social norm learning.Frontiers in Psychology, 14:1153809, 2023. 42

    2023

  209. [2011]

    Springer, 2011

    Proceedings 14, pages 36–50. Springer, 2011

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.