Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above
As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2502.14127.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T05:38:24.830582Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-07-03T05:27:40.324248Z
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation 7cc104ec-fed8-4403-a680-f6a696278730 · inbound
Visual Compositional Tuning cites this paper.
Visual Compositional Tuning Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above
Reference 2
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-22T17:41:53.171030Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.
Observation c8e6d571-1cd2-4819-b888-b23386e77b0c · inbound
From Calibration to Collaboration: LLM Uncertainty Quantification Should Be More Human-Centered cites this paper.
From Calibration to Collaboration: LLM Uncertainty Quantification Should Be More Human-Centered Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above
Reference 2024
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T05:38:24.830582Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 48189976-0062-485b-8128-1290e3101f2d · inbound
Are We Evaluating Knowledge or Phrasing? Mitigating MCQA Sensitivity with ParaEval cites this paper.
Are We Evaluating Knowledge or Phrasing? Mitigating MCQA Sensitivity with ParaEval Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above
Reference 2
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-03T05:27:40.325986Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.