Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 112 references

Constructing X-ray Spectral Models of Galaxies: Varying Contributions from X-ray Binary Populations with Host Galaxy Properties

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a galaxy's integrated X-ray binary spectrum, with its stochastic uncertainty, can be predicted from stellar mass, star formation rate, and metallicity.

desk verdict Genuinely useful stochastic spectral-modeling pipeline with a sparse-ULX calibration as its main soft spot; deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10180 v1 pith:XXZDJVBB submitted 2026-08-10 astro-ph.GA

Emerson Gehr , Bret D. Lehmer , Antara R. Basu-Zych , Konstantinos Kovlakas , Vianney Lebouteiller , Erik B. Monson , Izabela Pavel , Chris Richardson
show 2 more authors
Maxime Varese Zachary Wilson
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords X-raybinarystarsluminosityfunctiongalaxy-integratedspectrastochasticsamplingmain-sequencegalaxiesmass-metallicityrelationstarformationrateultraluminoussources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the X-ray spectrum of a galaxy's population of X-ray binaries can be computed from three host properties---stellar mass, star formation rate, and metallicity---while explicitly carrying the Poisson-like stochastic scatter of the X-ray luminosity function through to the spectral prediction. The authors build the model by drawing the roughly fifteen most luminous sources from the luminosity function, assigning each a spectral shape sampled from empirical luminosity-dependent distributions of intrinsic absorption and photon index, and integrating the remaining faint sources analytically. They test the resulting simulated spectra against observed X-ray data for five galaxies spanning high to low mass, star formation rate, and metallicity, reporting that the models give statistically acceptable reproductions. For galaxies on the star-forming main sequence, the paper collapses the input to stellar mass alone, using established mass--star formation rate and mass--metallicity relations to produce a public library of default X-ray binary spectral models with realistic normalization and shape uncertainties. If correct, this replaces fixed template spectra with property-dependent, stochastic models for applications such as dwarf-galaxy active galactic nucleus searches and modeling X-ray heating of the early universe.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a hybrid sampling formula for the integrated spectrum: $L_E(E) = \int (dN/dL)\, L\, F_E(E,L)\, dL + \sum_{i=1}^{n} L_i f_{E,i}(E,L_i)$, where $n \sim \mathrm{Poisson}(\lambda=15)$. The first term integrates the XLF over the faint end using luminosity-dependent base functions $F_E(E,L)$; the second term explicitly samples the $n$ brightest sources, whose luminosities set their spectral bin and whose intrinsic absorption $N_{\rm H,int}$ and photon index $\Gamma$ are drawn from covariance contours built from 765 resolved point sources. This concentrates computational effort on the sources that dominate the total X-ray luminosity and the spectral shape, and it converts XLF stochasticity directly into spectral-model uncertainty.

What would settle it

Take a galaxy with its own resolved X-ray point-source catalog that is not among the five used for testing, sum the actual spectra of its detected X-ray binaries, and compare that sum to the model's predicted spectrum computed only from the galaxy's stellar mass, star formation rate, and metallicity; the central claim fails if the observed band fluxes fall outside the model's 68% uncertainty envelope more often than expected by chance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that stochastic sampling of the X-ray luminosity function, not just its mean, is required and sufficient to predict the integrated 0.5--8 keV spectrum of an X-ray binary population. Concretely, it asserts that the population-integrated spectrum can be written as an integral of a luminosity-dependent base spectrum over the faint end of the luminosity function plus a sum over the roughly fifteen brightest sources whose luminosities and spectral shapes are drawn from the XLF and from empirical covariance distributions of $\log N_{\rm H,int}$ and $\Gamma$. It further claims that spectral models built this way reproduce the observed X-ray spectra of five galaxies---spanning late-type star-forming and early-type elliptical systems across broad ranges of stellar mass, star formation rate, and metallicity---and that applying main-sequence mass--SFR and mass--metallicity relations yields typical X-ray binary spectral models as a function of stellar mass alone.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the empirical distribution of spectral shapes measured from 765 resolved point sources---especially the sparsely populated ultraluminous-source bin at $\log L = 39.5$--$41.0$---represents the X-ray binary populations in every galaxy the model is applied to.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For fixed stellar mass, star formation rate, and metallicity, the procedure returns a full distribution of possible 0.5--8 keV X-ray binary spectra, so the uncertainty in a galaxy's X-ray luminosity and spectral shape can be propagated into downstream analyses rather than assumed away.
  • On the galaxy main sequence, stellar mass alone determines the median X-ray binary spectral model and its 68% and 95% confidence bands, enabling quick estimates for galaxies without measured star formation rate or metallicity.
  • Low-mass, low-metallicity, low-star-formation galaxies are predicted to show broad, skewed, sometimes bimodal total-luminosity distributions, meaning a single observation may look anomalous even when the underlying population is perfectly normal.
  • The public spectral model library can be used to subtract or forward-model the X-ray binary contribution when searching for fainter nuclear or diffuse X-ray emission in galaxies of any mass.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not pursue it, but the same sampling-plus-base-function machinery can ingest any XLF prescription, including population-synthesis XLFs with star-formation-history dependence, turning them into spectral models for high-redshift galaxies without rederiving the spectral-shape library.
  • Because the sparsely populated ultraluminous-source bin most affects high-star-formation galaxies, the paper's model implies a testable tightening: once more ultraluminous-source spectra are measured, the predicted high-energy slopes for starburst systems should shift systematically and the current marginal fits should improve.
  • The bimodal total-luminosity distributions for low-mass galaxies imply that hardness-ratio or color-color diagnostics built from single-epoch observations of dwarf galaxies may misclassify ordinary stochastic X-ray binary populations as active-galactic-nucleus candidates; stacking many dwarf galaxies should reveal the predicted wide spectral scatter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper presents a procedure for constructing galaxy-integrated X-ray spectral models of X-ray binary (XRB) populations, including stochastic sampling uncertainties, as a function of host stellar mass (M*), star formation rate (SFR), and metallicity (Z). The procedure adopts empirical HMXB and LMXB luminosity functions (XLFs) from Lehmer et al. (2021, 2019), samples the bright end of the XLF directly (the ~15 brightest sources, with the number drawn from a Poisson distribution), and integrates the faint end of the XLF analytically. Spectral shapes are assigned by drawing N_H,int and Gamma from empirical luminosity-dependent distributions built from 765 Chandra point sources, and the integrated model is assembled via Equation (8). The method is tested on five galaxies spanning wide ranges of M*, SFR, and Z, with null-hypothesis probabilities p_null between 0.079 and 0.81, and is used to construct a main-sequence (MS) XRB spectral model library as a function of M*. The central claim is that this procedure and the associated library provide statistically acceptable reproductions of observed Chandra spectra across early- and late-type galaxies.

Significance. The main deliverable—a fast, stochastic XRB spectral simulator that accepts arbitrary XLF inputs—is useful and timely for AGN-removal studies, X-ray binary population synthesis comparisons, and modeling of X-ray heating at high redshift. The paper ships a publicly available spectral model library (Zenodo DOI), and the authors explicitly state that the procedure can sample any XLF. The validation against external Chandra data, the comparison of the stochastic luminosity PDFs with previous full XLF sampling (Tables 2 and 3), and the explicit acknowledgement of the ULX spectral-shape limitations are notable strengths. If the sensitivity of the results to the sparsely populated ULX bin is shown to be acceptable, the method and library will be a solid community resource.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.1 / Fig. 6 / §5.1 / §6] In §4.1 and Fig. 6, the final luminosity bin (log L = 39.5–41.0) is described as 'more sparsely populated than the others due to limited observational coverage,' yet this bin supplies the spectral shapes for the brightest sources that dominate Eq. 8; Fig. 2 shows that for SFR ≳ 0.2–2 M⊙ yr−1 the expected brightest source is a ULX. In §5.1, the two high-SFR validation galaxies (NGC 3310 and the Antennae) have the lowest p_null values (0.18 and 0.079), and §6 concedes that better sampling of the ULX population spectral properties is needed for galaxies like these. The validation evidence for the central claim is therefore weakest in precisely the regime where the calibration is least constrained. Please add a quantitative sensitivity analysis: report the number of sources in the ULX bin, characterize the covariance-contour uncertainty, and propagate it through Eq. 8 to show how the predicted spectra and p_null values change. If the impact is substantial, the §5.1 claim of statistically acceptable reproductions 'across both early- and late-type galaxies spanning a broad range of M*, SFR, and Z' should be tempered or restricted to the regimes with adequate calibration.
  2. [§5.1 (likelihood analysis)] In §5.1, the description of the p_null calculation is too brief to assess the validation. Please specify how the per-energy-bin probability for each observed Chandra measurement is derived from the 500 model realizations (empirical CDF, smoothed histogram, or parametric fit), whether the 10 energy bins are treated as statistically independent, and how the finite number of realizations limits the resolution of p_null. The definition of L_mod for an individual simulated model also needs a formula. Since the claim of 'statistically acceptable reproductions' rests entirely on these p_null values, the calculation must be fully reproducible and the binning choices justified.
  3. [§5.2 / Fig. 14 / Table 1] The confidence bands in Fig. 14 and the model spreads in Fig. 10 reflect only stochastic sampling of the XLF and spectral-shape draws. They do not incorporate uncertainties in the XLF parameters (Table 1), the adopted M*-SFR and M*-Z relations, or the empirical spectral-shape distributions themselves. The published intervals are therefore conditional on the adopted relations and likely understate the true model uncertainty. Please state this limitation explicitly in the text and in the library documentation, or provide a means for users to propagate the parameter uncertainties (e.g., by sampling the Table 1 parameters from their errors).
  4. [§5.2 (MZR stitching)] In §5.2, the piecewise M*-Z relation joins Berg et al. (2012) for log(M*/M⊙) < 8.25, Lebouteiller et al. (2025) for 8.25–10.5, and Curti et al. (2020) for > 10.5. The paper does not demonstrate that the relation is continuous at the boundaries; if it is not, the MS library (Fig. 14, Table 4) would show unphysical jumps at those stellar masses. Please plot the combined relation and its derivative and either smooth the transitions or show quantitatively that any discontinuities are negligible relative to the stochastic scatter.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§4.2] The sentence 'If anyone notices any minor corrections that should be made before then, please let me know.' appears to be a leftover editorial note and should be removed.
  2. [§3.2] The claim that the L_X PDFs converge for n ≳ 15 is reported but not demonstrated; please include a convergence plot or a table of KS statistics comparing PDFs from different n.
  3. [Fig. 6] Please state the number of point sources contributing to each luminosity bin, particularly the ULX bin, so the reader can gauge the robustness of the covariance contours.
  4. [§5.1] The likelihood analysis uses 10 energy bins, but the bin edges are not given; please specify the bin boundaries and state whether the same binning is used for all five galaxies.
  5. [Table 4] Some entries appear inconsistent with the column behavior (e.g., the 39.44 value in the logM*=8.0 column versus 38.07 in the logM*=9.0 column); please verify the table values and formatting.
  6. [References] The reference list contains duplicate entries for Misra et al. 2023 (A&A 672, A99); please remove one.
  7. [§6 summary list] In the summary bullet list, 'we have discovered' for the N_H,int–Gamma covariance is more naturally phrased as 'we find' or 'we measure,' given the empirical nature of the result.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Validation galaxies overlap the spectral-shape calibration sample, making the claimed 'statistically acceptable reproductions' partially circular for the spectral-shape component.

  1. fitted input called prediction [§4.1 (Fig. 6), §5.1 (Fig. 10), §5.2 (Fig. 11)]
    "We test our method on 5 galaxies covering a wide range of M*, SFR, and Z: NGC 1569, NGC 3310, the Antennae interacting galaxies (NGC 4038/4039), NGC 3377, and NGC 3115. ... All galaxies in Figure 11 are plotted to show their positions relative to the MS. These galaxies make up the covariance contours in Figure 6, from which we draw our spectral model parameters."

    The spectral-shape inputs (N_H,int and Gamma covariance contours) are fitted from point sources in the Figure 6 sample, and the text states that the Figure 11 galaxies—which include the five validation galaxies—'make up the covariance contours in Figure 6.' For each validation galaxy, the model draws N_H,int and Gamma for every sampled source from those contours, so the predicted integrated spectrum (Eq. 8) is a resampling of spectral shapes fitted from the very galaxies used to compute p_null in §5.1. The p_null statistic therefore measures internal consistency between the XLF-weighted calibration shapes and the summed calibration spectra, not an independent out-of-sample prediction of spectral shape.

full rationale

The paper is largely a synthesis of empirical ingredients: the XLF scaling relations are adopted from Lehmer et al. (2019, 2021), and the luminosity-dependent spectral-shape distributions are fitted from Chandra point-source catalogs (Lehmer et al. 2024; PHANGS, Lehmer et al. in prep.). Those ingredients are not equivalent to the output by definition; the stochastic sampling procedure and the construction of integrated spectra via Eq. 8 are genuinely new, and the comparisons to full XLF sampling and to the L_X-SFR-Z relation are consistency checks rather than circular reasoning. The principal circularity lies in the validation design: the five test galaxies are plotted in Figure 11, and the text explicitly says these galaxies 'make up the covariance contours in Figure 6, from which we draw our spectral model parameters.' Because the same galaxies contribute both the spectral-shape calibration and the validation spectra, the reported p_null values in §5.1 do not provide an independent test of the spectral-shape component, though the XLF weighting and stochastic sampling add independent content. The paper's own §6 limitation—'The final panel of Figure 6 corresponds to ULXs and is more sparsely populated than the others due to limited observational coverage'—is a data-coverage weakness that restricts predictive power in high-SFR regimes (NGC 3310, Antennae) but is not itself a circular step. Overall, the central derivation is not circular by construction, but the headline validation claim is partially circular because the spectral shapes are calibrated on the same galaxies used for testing.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central model is an assembly of empirical inputs: XLF parameters and MS scaling relations from the authors' prior work (Lehmer et al. 2019, 2021) and from the literature, plus spectral-shape distributions from Chandra data. The only hand-tuned internal parameters are n=15 and L_min=10^34 erg/s. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • HMXB XLF parameters (A_HM, gamma1, L_b,HM, gamma2,sun, L_c,sun, dgamma2/dlogZ, dlogLc/dlogZ) = 1.29 (M_sun/yr)^-1; 1.74; log 38.54; 1.16; log 39.98; 1.34 dex^-1; 0.60 dex dex^-1 (Table 1)
    Adopted from Lehmer et al. (2021) empirical HMXB luminosity function; the stochastic draws and spectral weights in Eq. 8 depend on these values.
  • LMXB XLF parameters (K_LM, alpha1, L_b,LM, alpha2, L_c,LM) = 26.0 (1e11 M_sun)^-1; 1.31; log 38.3; 2.57; log 40.8 (Table 1)
    Adopted from Lehmer et al. (2019) empirical LMXB luminosity function.
  • M*-SFR relation (Aird et al. 2019) = Parameters and +/-0.4 dex scatter from Aird et al. (2019)
    Maps M* to SFR for main-sequence models in Section 5.2; uncertainty is adopted, not re-fitted.
  • M*-Z relations (Berg et al. 2012; Lebouteiller et al. 2025; Curti et al. 2020) = Piecewise relation values from the three cited papers
    Used to assign Z from M* for MS spectral library; the low-mass and high-mass branches are stitched by hand.
  • n, number of brightest sampled sources = n ~ Poisson(lambda=15)
    Hand-chosen in Section 3.2; the paper shows PDFs converge for n >= 15, balancing speed and accuracy.
  • L_min integration cutoff = log L_min = 34 erg/s
    Lower limit of the integrated faint end in Eq. 7; chosen to avoid sampling individual low-luminosity sources.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The number of X-ray sources above a given luminosity follows a Poisson distribution with mean equal to the CLF prediction.
    Used throughout Section 3.2 to generate stochastic population draws (Eq. 6, Eq. 7).
  • domain assumption The Lehmer et al. (2021) HMXB and Lehmer et al. (2019) LMXB luminosity functions are valid descriptions of XRB populations over the full range of M*, SFR, and Z considered, including extrapolation to low Z and low SFR.
    Equations 1-3 are the starting point for all sampling; the paper does not re-derive or test these scalings.
  • domain assumption The 765-source Chandra sample's luminosity-binned distributions of N_H,int and Gamma are representative of all XRB spectral shapes, including ULXs in the sparsely populated log L = 39.5-41.0 bin.
    Section 4.1 builds Figure 6 from Lehmer et al. (2024) and PHANGS; Section 6 concedes ULX coverage is limited.
  • domain assumption An absorbed power law (tbabs x tbabs x powerlaw) adequately represents individual XRB spectra in the 0.5-8 keV band.
    Used for all 765 source fits and for the base functions F_E(E,L) in Section 4.1 and Figure 7.
  • domain assumption The main-sequence relations used (Aird et al. 2019; Berg et al. 2012; Lebouteiller et al. 2025; Curti et al. 2020) hold at z=0 and apply to the modeled MS galaxies.
    Section 5.2 uses these to set SFR and Z from M* only; the paper adopts z=0 for the library.
  • domain assumption Sampling the ~15 brightest sources and integrating the rest converges to the true L_X distribution.
    Section 3.2 states convergence for n >= 15 and validates against full sampling in Figures 4-5 and Tables 2-3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constructing X-ray Spectral Models of Galaxies: Varying Contributions from X-ray Binary Populations with Host Galaxy Properties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XXZDJVBB

@misc{pith2026260810180,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constructing X-ray Spectral Models of Galaxies: Varying Contributions from X-ray Binary Populations with Host Galaxy Properties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XXZDJVBB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10180}
}
abstract

Recent work has shown that the emission from X-ray binary (XRB) populations in galaxies varies with stellar mass ($M_\star$), star formation rate (SFR), and metallicity ($Z$). Such scaling relations are widely used to predict the XRB contributions to galaxy-integrated X-ray luminosities including studies focused on dwarf active galactic nuclei (AGN) and the X-ray radiation field during the epoch of heating in the early ($z \geq 8$) universe. However, as galaxies approach low SFR and low $Z$, the relatively shallow slope of the XRB luminosity function (XLF) can yield very large stochastic variations in the total X-ray luminosity expected from the XRB population, for fixed values of $M_\star$, SFR, and $Z$. We have created a procedure to statistically sample any XLF and model total X-ray spectra for XRB populations and their stochastic uncertainties. We demonstrate the accuracy of this procedure using data for galaxies ranging from high to low $M_\star$, SFR, and $Z$ and generating X-ray spectral models consistent with Chandra observations. For galaxies that lie on the galactic main-sequence, we can relate SFR and $Z$ to $M_\star$ using established $M_\star$-SFR and $M_\star$-$Z$ relations. Applying these relations, we construct main-sequence (MS) XRB spectral models, which provide typical XRB spectral shapes, normalizations, and uncertainties as a function of $M_\star$. The spectral model library associated with this work is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20126734.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10180 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cumulative XLFs normalized by M⋆ for varying sSFR (yr−1 ) at different metallicities (Z). The LMXB CLF is plotted in light grey in each panel for comparison. We also plot a typical CLF for a MS galaxy at each metallicity as the dashed grey line. For all metallicities, low sSFR curves more closely match the LMXB CLF due to the HMXB CLF being greatly dependent on SFR. Similarly, high sSFR causes the curve to be more a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The luminosity of the expected brightest source (Lmax) inferred from the HMXB XLF as a function of SFR for different metallicities. The purple dashed line denotes the dividing line between ULXs and more typical XRBs that are accreting at sub-Eddington rates. Since the HMXB popula￾tion luminosity and spectrum is expected to be dominated by Lmax, ULXs play a significant role in shaping the inte￾grated X-ray spectral o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two XLFs for different populations with the same specific star formation rate (sSFR) of 10−9 yr−1 and Z = 0.30 Z⊙. These galaxies have the same sSFR, however, M⋆ and SFR are able to vary quite a bit, causing the luminosity of the brightest source to take on a wide range of possible values. The continuous XLF is generated from the sum of Equation 1 and 2 and is shown in red. We also assigned luminosities to the sourc… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Probability density functions (PDFs) of log(LX/SFR) for HMXB populations to see the effects of SFR and Z on the shape of the distributions. For all metallicities, we see a narrowing of the PDF with increasing SFR. The wide distributions at low SFR are results of sampli…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: PDFs of log LX/M⋆ for LMXB populations with varying stellar masses. These PDFs are independent of Z since the LMXB XLF does not depend on Z (Equation 2). Similarly to the relationship between the PDF shape and SFR in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Covariance contours of log NH,int and Γ for several bins of log L created from sources in Lehmer et al. (2024) and PHANGS galaxies from Lehmer et al. (in prep.). We draw from these contours when generating spectral models to get realistic values for NH,int and Γ depend…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Base functions, FE(E, L), used in generating spectral models as a function of logL. Each function cor￾responds to a bin of log L, which is denoted in the legend. These base functions are independent of the XLF and are used in Equation 8 to construct our final spectral …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: False-color optical/near-IR images of the galaxies for which we generated spectral models (see §5.1 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Chandra data (red dots with errors) plotted with our simulated spectral models (blue) for the 5 galaxies shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top panel: M⋆-SFR relation from Aird et al. (2019). Bottom panel: M⋆-Z relations from Berg et al. (2012); Lebouteiller et al. (2025) and Curti et al. (2020). The 5 galaxies shown in Figures 9 and 10, galaxies from Lehmer et al. (2024), and PHANGS galaxies from Lehmer …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Median LX vs. SFR using the sampling proce￾dure explained in §3.2 for both types of XRBs (black solid line) and the median HM and LM components are shown with the dashed magenta and green lines, respectively. The 68% and 95% uncertainty are shown by the dark grey and …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Spectral models for typical MS galaxies with M⋆ = 108 , 109 , 1010 , and 1011 M⊙. The median model is shown as a solid, black line, and the 1σ and 2σ confidence intervals are shown in dark and light blue, respectively. We notice larger areas of uncertainty at lower M⋆…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, Vol. 101, 17. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ASPC..101...17A

    1996

  2. [5]

    A., Walton , D

    Bachetti , M., Harrison , F. A., Walton , D. J., et al. 2014, , 514, 202, 10.1038/nature13791

    doi:10.1038/nature13791 2014

  3. [7]

    A., Skillman, E

    Berg, D. A., Skillman, E. D., Marble, A. R., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 754, 98

    2012

  4. [10]

    C., Stanway , E

    Bray , J. C., Stanway , E. R., & Eldridge , J. J. 2025, , 542, 2087, 10.1093/mnras/staf1348

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1348 2025

  5. [11]

    2012, AE: ACIS Extract , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1203.001

    Broos , P., Townsley , L., Getman , K., & Bauer , F. 2012, AE: ACIS Extract , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1203.001. 1203.001

    2012

  6. [12]

    S., Townsley , L

    Broos , P. S., Townsley , L. K., Feigelson , E. D., et al. 2010, , 714, 1582, 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1582

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/2/1582 2010

  7. [14]

    J., Natarajan , P., Baldassare , V

    Burke , C. J., Natarajan , P., Baldassare , V. F., & Geha , M. 2025, , 978, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad94d9

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad94d9 2025

  8. [17]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 944

    Curti, M., Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., & Maiolino, R. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 944

    2020

Show all 112 references
  1. [19]

    Ebisawa, K., Titarchuk, L., & Chakrabarti, S. K. 1996, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 48, 59

    1996

  2. [20]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306, 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  3. [24]

    C., Allen, G

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Observatory Operations : Strategies , Processes , and Systems , Vol. 6270 (SPIE), 586--597, 10.1117/12.671760

    2006 doi

  4. [25]

    D., Basu-Zych, A., et al

    Garofali, K., Lehmer, B. D., Basu-Zych, A., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 903, 79

    2020

  5. [26]

    R., Johnson, B

    Garofali, K., Basu-Zych, A. R., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 960, 13

    2024

  6. [28]

    D., Doore, K., et al

    Gilbertson, W., Lehmer, B. D., Doore, K., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 926, 28

    2022

  7. [34]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 520, 4902

    Groves, B., Kreckel, K., Santoro, F., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 520, 4902

    2023

  8. [35]

    2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 659, A188

    i Bernadich, M., Schwope, A., Kovlakas, K., Zezas, A., & Traulsen, I. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 659, A188

    2022

  9. [37]

    A., & Mandel, E

    Joye, W. A., & Mandel, E. 2003, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII, Vol. 295, 489. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ASPC..295..489J

    2003

  10. [38]

    2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

    Justham, S., & Schawinski, K. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

    2012

  11. [42]

    2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, A28

    Kovlakas, K., Fragos, T., Schaerer, D., & Mesinger, A. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, A28

    2022

  12. [43]

    J., et al

    Kovlakas, K., Zezas, A., Andrews, J. J., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 498, 4790

    2020

  13. [44]

    2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 695, A31

    Lebouteiller, V., Richardson, C., Polimera, M., et al. 2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 695, A31

    2025

  14. [50]

    2017, , 840, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af9

    Madau , P., & Fragos , T. 2017, , 840, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af9

    2017 doi

  15. [51]

    Mesinger , A., Ferrara , A., & Spiegel , D. S. 2013, , 431, 621, 10.1093/mnras/stt198

    2013 doi

  16. [52]

    R., et al

    Mezcua , M., Hlavacek-Larrondo , J., Lucey , J. R., et al. 2018, , 474, 1342, 10.1093/mnras/stx2812

    2018 doi

  17. [54]

    2012 b , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 426, 1870

    ---. 2012 b , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 426, 1870

    2012

  18. [55]

    L., et al

    Mingozzi, M., Garcia del Valle-Espinosa, M., James, B. L., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 985, 253

    2025

  19. [59]

    E., & Prelogovi \'c , D

    Nikoli \'c , I., Mesinger , A., Davies , J. E., & Prelogovi \'c , D. 2024, , 692, A142, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451213

    2024 doi

  20. [61]

    2014, , 443, 678, 10.1093/mnras/stu1240

    Pacucci , F., Mesinger , A., Mineo , S., & Ferrara , A. 2014, , 443, 678, 10.1093/mnras/stu1240

    2014 doi

  21. [63]

    2003, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 399, 39

    Ranalli, P., Comastri, A., & Setti, G. 2003, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 399, 39

    2003

  22. [64]

    A., Kalogera, V., Doctor, Z., et al

    Rocha, K. A., Kalogera, V., Doctor, Z., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 971, 133

    2024

  23. [67]

    P., Mirocha, J., et al

    Senchyna, P., Stark, D. P., Mirocha, J., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494, 941

    2020

  24. [68]

    2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A127

    Simmonds, C., Schaerer, D., & Verhamme, A. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A127

    2021

  25. [69]

    E., Wik, D

    Vulic, N., Hornschemeier, A. E., Wik, D. R., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 864, 150

    2018

  26. [70]

    2024, Universe, 10, 453

    Weng, S.-S., & Ji, L. 2024, Universe, 10, 453

    2024

  27. [74]

    Journal of Applied Statistics , keywords =

    Distribution of the C statistic with applications to the sample mean of Poisson data. Journal of Applied Statistics , keywords =. doi:10.1080/02664763.2019.1704703 , archivePrefix =. 1912.05444 , primaryClass =

    2019

  28. [75]

    The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review , author =

    Modelling the behaviour of accretion flows in. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review , author =. 2007 , note =. doi:10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1 , abstract =

    2007 doi

  29. [76]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , author =

    X-. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab22a8 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  30. [77]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Accreting strongly magnetised neutron stars: X-ray Pulsars. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2204.14185 , archivePrefix =. 2204.14185 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  31. [78]

    , keywords =

    Ultraluminous X-ray sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2022.101672 , archivePrefix =. 2302.10605 , primaryClass =

    2022

  32. [79]

    , keywords =

    An ultraluminous X-ray source powered by an accreting neutron star. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature13791 , archivePrefix =. 1410.3590 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  33. [80]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Models for. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1086/588456 , abstract =

    2008 doi

  34. [81]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    X-ray luminosity function of high-mass. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244929 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  35. [82]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    The. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcec1 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  36. [83]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    X-rays across the galaxy population –. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz125 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  37. [84]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Metallicity. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2008 , note =. doi:10.1086/587500 , abstract =

    2008 doi

  38. [85]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    X-ray emission from the extended discs of spiral galaxies , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14464.x , abstract =

    2009

  39. [86]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Ultraluminous. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  40. [87]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Enhanced. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw284 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  41. [88]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Cosmic. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  42. [89]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    The. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4653 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  43. [90]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    X-ray emission from star-forming galaxies -. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19862.x , abstract =

    2012

  44. [91]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    A. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/559 , abstract =

    2010 doi

  45. [92]

    Arnaud, K. A. , month = jan, year =. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , shorttitle =

  46. [93]

    sherpa/sherpa:

    Burke, Doug and Laurino, Omar and wmclaugh and dtnguyen2 and Marie-Terrell and Günther, Hans Moritz and Siemiginowska, Aneta and Budynkiewicz, Jamie and Aldcroft, Tom and Deil, Christoph and Sipőcz, Brigitta and Buchner, Johannes and Laginja, Iva and Leinweber, Katrin and nple...

    doi

  47. [94]

    and Allen, Glenn E

    Fruscione, Antonella and McDowell, Jonathan C. and Allen, Glenn E. and Brickhouse, Nancy S. and Burke, Douglas J. and Davis, John E. and Durham, Nick and Elvis, Martin and Galle, Elizabeth C. and Harris, Daniel E. and Huenemoerder, David P. and Houck, John C. and Ishibashi, Bi...

  48. [95]

    Joye, W. A. and Mandel, E. , month = jan, year =. New. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII , url =

  49. [96]

    2013 , pages =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/L31 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  50. [98]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    X-. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/41 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  51. [99]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    An. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8de7 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  52. [100]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    The. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2fc0 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  53. [101]

    Another thread in the tapestry of stellar feedback:

    Justham, Stephen and Schawinski, Kevin , year =. Another thread in the tapestry of stellar feedback:. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , language =

  54. [102]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    High-mass. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06224.x , abstract =

    2003

  55. [103]

    Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    X-ray. Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1009-9271/3/S1/257 , abstract =

    2003 doi

  56. [104]

    2011 , note =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2011 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/12 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  57. [105]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Dependence of the low-mass. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2012 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219015 , abstract =

    2012 doi

  58. [106]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , author =

    X-. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab9175 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  59. [107]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Sub-galactic scaling relations between. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1063 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  60. [108]

    2013 , note =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2013 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/152 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  61. [109]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    X-rays across the galaxy population –. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2700 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  62. [110]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Galactic star formation rates gauged by stellar end-products , volume =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2007 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054146 , abstract =

    2007 doi

  63. [112]

    Tennant, Allyn F and Wu, Kinwah and Ghosh, Kajal K and Kolodziejczak, Jeffery J and Swartz, Douglas A , year =

  64. [113]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Properties of discrete. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031074 , abstract =

    2003 doi

  65. [114]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Old and. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1086/380899 , abstract =

    2004 doi

  66. [115]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    X-rays across the galaxy population –. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2932 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  67. [116]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Star. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1086/517926 , abstract =

    2007 doi

  68. [117]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    A multiwavelength consensus on the main sequence of star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 2 , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1110 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  69. [118]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Evolution of the specific star formation rate function at z. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425176 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  70. [119]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    The. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425017 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  71. [120]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Low-mass. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07473.x , abstract =

    2004

  72. [121]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Observational evidence for matter propagation in accretion flows , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17765.x , abstract =

    2011

  73. [122]

    , keywords =

    X-ray luminosity function of high-mass X-ray binaries: Studying the signatures of different physical processes using detailed binary evolution calculations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244929 , archivePrefix =. 2209.05505 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  74. [123]

    , keywords =

    The most massive black holes on the Fundamental Plane of black hole accretion. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2812 , archivePrefix =. 1710.10268 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  75. [124]

    , keywords =

    X-BPASS : self-consistent modelling of stellar populations and their associated X-ray binary emission in a binary stellar evolution framework. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1348 , archivePrefix =. 2508.18628 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  76. [125]

    , keywords =

    Multiwavelength Constraints on the Local Black Hole Occupation Fraction. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad94d9 , archivePrefix =. 2410.11177 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  77. [126]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Central Massive Black Holes Are Not Ubiquitous in Local Low-Mass Galaxies. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.05252 , archivePrefix =. 2510.05252 , primaryClass =

    doi

  78. [127]

    , keywords =

    Signatures of X-rays in the early Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt198 , archivePrefix =. 1210.7319 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  79. [128]

    , keywords =

    The X-ray spectra of the first galaxies: 21 cm signatures. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1240 , archivePrefix =. 1403.6125 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  80. [129]

    , keywords =

    The importance of stochasticity in determining galaxy emissivities and UV LFs during cosmic dawn and reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451213 , archivePrefix =. 2406.15237 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  81. [130]

    Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , year = 2022, editor =

    X-Ray Binaries in External Galaxies. Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , year = 2022, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_108-1 , adsurl =

    2022 doi

  82. [131]

    , keywords =

    Radiation Backgrounds at Cosmic Dawn: X-Rays from Compact Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af9 , archivePrefix =. 1606.07887 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  83. [132]

    , keywords =

    Innovations in the Analysis of Chandra-ACIS Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1582 , archivePrefix =. 1003.2397 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  84. [133]

    , keywords =

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/670067 , archivePrefix =. 1202.3665 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  85. [134]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    On the. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2000 , note =. doi:10.1086/317016 , abstract =

    2000 doi

  86. [135]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan , volume=

    On the spectral slopes of hard x-ray emission from black hole candidates , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  87. [136]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    The 2--10 keV luminosity as a star formation rate indicator , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  88. [137]

    Hot interstellar medium , author=

    X-ray emission from star-forming galaxies—II. Hot interstellar medium , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  89. [138]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Direct oxygen abundances for low-luminosity LVL galaxies , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  90. [139]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The mass--metallicity and the fundamental metallicity relation revisited on a fully T e-based abundance scale for galaxies , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  91. [140]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Can nebular He II emission be explained by ultra-luminous X-ray sources? , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  92. [141]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    High-mass X-ray binaries in nearby metal-poor galaxies: on the contribution to nebular He ii emission , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  93. [142]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Exploring the mysterious high-ionization source powering [Ne v] in high-z analog SBS0335-052 E with JWST/MIRI , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  94. [143]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Modeling the High-energy Ionizing Output from Simple Stellar and X-Ray Binary Populations , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  95. [144]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Recovering the properties of the interstellar medium through integrated spectroscopy: Application to the z 0 ECO volume-limited star-forming galaxy sample , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  96. [145]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Black holes and neutron stars in nearby galaxies: insights from NuSTAR , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  97. [146]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    On the X-ray spectral energy distributions of STAR-forming galaxies: The 0.3--30 kev spectrum of the low-metallicity Starburst Galaxy VV 114 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  98. [147]

    Universe , volume=

    x-ray views of galactic accreting pulsars in high-mass x-Ray binaries , author=. Universe , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  99. [148]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    The ionizing and heating power of ultraluminous X-ray sources under the geometrical beaming model , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  100. [149]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    A census of ultraluminous X-ray sources in the local Universe , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  101. [150]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    An expanded ultraluminous X-ray source catalogue , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  102. [151]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The Stellar-age Dependence of X-Ray Emission from Normal Star-forming Galaxies in the GOODS Fields , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  103. [152]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    To be or not to be: The role of rotation in modeling Galactic Be X-ray binaries , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  104. [153]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The PHANGS--MUSE nebular catalogue , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.