Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Classification vs. Regression in Supervised Learning for Single Channel Speaker Count Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.04555 v2 pith:XYUWMD4Y submitted 2017-12-12 eess.AS cs.SD

classification eess.AScs.SD
keywords countspeakerclassificationnetworkaudiobestchannelestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The task of estimating the maximum number of concurrent speakers from single channel mixtures is important for various audio-based applications, such as blind source separation, speaker diarisation, audio surveillance or auditory scene classification. Building upon powerful machine learning methodology, we develop a Deep Neural Network (DNN) that estimates a speaker count. While DNNs efficiently map input representations to output targets, it remains unclear how to best handle the network output to infer integer source count estimates, as a discrete count estimate can either be tackled as a regression or a classification problem. In this paper, we investigate this important design decision and also address complementary parameter choices such as the input representation. We evaluate a state-of-the-art DNN audio model based on a Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory network architecture for speaker count estimations. Through experimental evaluations aimed at identifying the best overall strategy for the task and show results for five seconds speech segments in mixtures of up to ten speakers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools