pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22689 · v1 · pith:XZNK36LWnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · astro-ph.HE

X-ray and extreme-ultraviolet spectra from collisions of Ar¹⁸⁺ and O⁸⁺ ions with neutrals

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 03:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph astro-ph.HE
keywords charge exchangex-ray emissionextreme ultravioletelectron beam ion trapLandau-Zener modelargon ionsoxygen ionselectron capture
0
0 comments X

The pith

Charge-exchange measurements in an EBIT resolve electron capture states in x-ray and EUV spectra from bare argon and oxygen ions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports new measurements of K-shell x-ray emission produced when fully ionized argon ions capture electrons from neutral gas targets at low collision energies. These data come from an electron beam ion trap that confines the ions and allows controlled introduction of neutrals. In addition, extreme-ultraviolet spectra from bare and hydrogen-like oxygen ions identify the principal quantum number of the captured electron. The authors compare the observed line intensities and positions to predictions from the multichannel Landau-Zener model and discuss where the theory matches or deviates from experiment.

Core claim

Measurements of K-shell x-ray emission following charge exchange of fully ionized argon with various neutral gaseous targets at small collision energies inside an electron beam ion trap, along with resolution of the principal quantum number of electron capture in extreme-ultraviolet spectra from initially bare and hydrogen-like oxygen ions, reveal discrepancies with theoretical models based on the multichannel Landau-Zener approach.

What carries the argument

The multichannel Landau-Zener approach to calculating state-selective charge exchange cross sections at low collision energies.

If this is right

  • The observed x-ray spectra provide benchmarks for refining charge-exchange models used in plasma diagnostics.
  • Resolved principal quantum numbers constrain the n-distribution of captured electrons in oxygen ions.
  • Direct comparison in the trap shows that certain model assumptions about collision energies or target states need adjustment.
  • Similar measurements with other ion species could map systematic trends in low-energy capture.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These results could improve modeling of charge exchange in astrophysical environments like supernova remnants where bare ions interact with neutral gas.
  • Laboratory EBIT data may help validate simulations for next-generation x-ray telescopes observing such processes.
  • Extending the energy range or target types might expose whether the discrepancies are energy-dependent or general to the model.

Load-bearing premise

The experimental conditions in the electron beam ion trap allow direct comparison of measured spectra to multichannel Landau-Zener calculations without major unaccounted systematic effects from trap fields, target density variations, or collision energy distributions.

What would settle it

A measurement of the same charge-exchange spectra using a different technique, such as a crossed-beam setup with precisely known collision energies, that shows significantly different line ratios or n-distributions would indicate unaccounted systematics in the trap data.

read the original abstract

We present measurements of K-shell x-ray emission following charge exchange of fully ionized argon with various neutral gaseous targets at small collision energies inside an electron beam ion trap. We also resolve the principal quantum number of electron capture in extreme-ultraviolet spectra from initially bare and hydrogen-like oxygen ions held in the same trap. We analyze discrepancies between these as well as previous measurements with theoretical models based on the multichannel Landau-Zener approach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental measurements of K-shell x-ray emission following charge exchange of Ar^{18+} ions with neutral gaseous targets at low collision energies inside an electron beam ion trap (EBIT). It additionally presents extreme-ultraviolet spectra that resolve the principal quantum number of electron capture for bare and hydrogen-like oxygen ions in the same trap. The work compares these spectra, along with prior measurements, to theoretical predictions based on the multichannel Landau-Zener approach and discusses observed discrepancies.

Significance. If the central claim of direct comparability between the EBIT measurements and zero-field multichannel Landau-Zener calculations holds after accounting for trap-specific effects, the results would supply useful benchmark data on low-energy charge exchange, particularly for K-shell x-ray production and n-resolved capture in astrophysical and laboratory plasmas. The ability to resolve principal quantum numbers in the EUV spectra is a positive experimental feature.

major comments (1)
  1. The manuscript's central comparison of measured spectra to multichannel Landau-Zener calculations assumes that EBIT conditions (magnetic field of a few tesla, electron-beam space-charge potential, and ion thermal velocity distribution) do not significantly alter the effective impact parameters or post-capture n-distributions relative to the zero-field, monoenergetic theoretical model. No quantitative bounds (e.g., via trajectory Monte-Carlo simulations or line-ratio measurements at varied beam currents) are provided to support this assumption, leaving open the possibility that reported discrepancies arise from unaccounted experimental systematics rather than deficiencies in the theoretical framework.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The major comment raises a valid point about the assumptions underlying our comparison between EBIT measurements and zero-field multichannel Landau-Zener calculations. We address this directly below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the discussion of potential experimental systematics.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The manuscript's central comparison of measured spectra to multichannel Landau-Zener calculations assumes that EBIT conditions (magnetic field of a few tesla, electron-beam space-charge potential, and ion thermal velocity distribution) do not significantly alter the effective impact parameters or post-capture n-distributions relative to the zero-field, monoenergetic theoretical model. No quantitative bounds (e.g., via trajectory Monte-Carlo simulations or line-ratio measurements at varied beam currents) are provided to support this assumption, leaving open the possibility that reported discrepancies arise from unaccounted experimental systematics rather than deficiencies in the theoretical framework.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of justifying the direct comparability. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section providing order-of-magnitude estimates showing that, at the low collision energies of the experiment, the relevant charge-exchange impact parameters are much smaller than the cyclotron radii in the few-tesla field, and that the space-charge potential and thermal velocity spread do not shift the dominant n-capture channels. We will also cite prior EBIT charge-exchange studies that reached similar conclusions for comparable systems. While we do not introduce new Monte-Carlo trajectory simulations or systematic beam-current scans in this work, the added estimates and literature references will make the assumption explicit and allow readers to assess its validity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurements compared to independent theoretical models

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of K-shell x-ray emission from Ar^{18+} charge exchange and EUV spectra resolving principal quantum number capture for O^{8+} ions in an EBIT, then compares observed spectra and discrepancies to multichannel Landau-Zener calculations. No load-bearing derivation, prediction, or first-principles result is presented that reduces by construction to parameters fitted from the same dataset or to self-citations whose validity depends on the current work. The theoretical framework is treated as an established external benchmark, and the manuscript's claims rest on observable spectral features rather than any tautological re-expression of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental data from an EBIT and comparison to the multichannel Landau-Zener model; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The multichannel Landau-Zener approach provides a suitable theoretical baseline for analyzing charge exchange at the collision energies used.
    The paper explicitly analyzes discrepancies between measurements and this model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5633 in / 1160 out tokens · 43984 ms · 2026-05-22T03:33:30.661571+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Science274(5285), 205–209 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274

    Lisse, C.M., Dennerl, K., Englhauser, J., Harden, M., Marshall, F.E., Mumma, M.J., Petre, R., Pye, J.P., Ricketts, M.J., Schmitt, J., Trümper, J., West, R.G.: 21 Discovery of X-ray and extreme ultraviolet emission from comet C/Hyakutake 1996 B2. Science274(5285), 205–209 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274. 5285.205

  2. [2]

    Astrophys

    Owens, A., Parmar, A.N., Oosterbroek, T., Orr, A., Antonelli, L.A., Fiore, F., Schulz, R., Tozzi, G.P., Maccarone, M.C., Piro, L.: Evidence for dust-related X- Ray emission from comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp). Astrophys. J.493(1), 47–51 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1086/311119

  3. [3]

    Science292(5520), 1343–1348 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.292.5520.1343 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/292/5520/1343.full.pdf

    Lisse, C.M., Christian, D.J., Dennerl, K., Meech, K.J., Petre, R., Weaver, H.A., Wolk, S.J.: Charge exchange-induced X-Ray emission from comet C/1999 S4 (LINEAR). Science292(5520), 1343–1348 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.292.5520.1343 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/292/5520/1343.full.pdf

  4. [4]

    Space Sci

    Krasnopolsky, V.A., Greenwood, J.B., Stancil, P.C.: X-Ray and extreme ultra- violet emissions from comets. Space Sci. Rev.113(3), 271–374 (2004) https: //doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAC.0000046754.75560.80

  5. [5]

    Koutroumpa, D., Modolo, R., Chanteur, G., Chaufray, J.-Y., Kharchenko, V., Lallement, R.: Solar wind charge exchange X-ray emission from Mars – model and data comparison. Astron. Astrophys.545, 153 (2012) https://doi.org/10. 1051/0004-6361/201219720

  6. [6]

    M., Bhardwaj, A., Burwitz, V., Englhauser, J., Gunell, H., Holmström, M., Jansen, F., Kharchenko, V., Rodríguez-Pascual, P

    Dennerl, K., Lisse, C. M., Bhardwaj, A., Burwitz, V., Englhauser, J., Gunell, H., Holmström, M., Jansen, F., Kharchenko, V., Rodríguez-Pascual, P. M.: First observation of Mars with XMM-Newton – high resolution X-ray spectroscopy with RGS. Astron. Astrophys.451(2), 709–722 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361:20054253

  7. [7]

    H., Jr, Cravens, T

    Branduardi-Raymont,G.,Bhardwaj,A.,Elsner,R.F.,Gladstone,G.R.,Ramsay, G., Rodriguez, P., Soria, R., Waite, J. H., Jr, Cravens, T. E.: A study of Jupiter’s aurorae with XMM-Newton. Astron. Astrophys.463(2), 761–774 (2007) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066406

  8. [8]

    Waite, J.H., Grodent, D., Mauk, B.M., Majeed, T., Gladstone, G.R., Bolton, S.J., Clarke, J.T., Gérard, J.-C., Lewis, W.S., Trafton, L.M., Walker, R.J., Inger- soll, A.P., Connerney, J.E.P.: Multispectral observations of Jupiter’s aurora. Adv. Space Res.26(10), 1453–1475 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(00) 00089-2

  9. [9]

    Astrophys

    Wargelin, B.J., Markevitch, M., Juda, M., Kharchenko, V., Edgar, R., Dalgarno, A.: Chandra observations of the “dark” Moon and geocoronal solar wind charge transfer. Astrophys. J.607(1), 596–610 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1086/383410

  10. [10]

    Liu, J., Wang, Q.D., Mao, S.: Charge-exchange X-ray emission of nearby star- forming galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.420(4), 3389–3395 (2012) https: 22 //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20263.x

  11. [11]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics686, 96 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202349064

    Fukushima, K., Kobayashi, S.B., Matsushita, K.: Revisiting the abundance pattern and charge-exchange emission in the centre of M82. Astronomy & Astrophysics686, 96 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202349064

  12. [12]

    Gu, L., Kaastra, J., Raassen, A. J. J., Mullen, P. D., Cumbee, R. S., Lyons, D., Stancil, P. C.: A novel scenario for the possible X-ray line feature at 3.5 keV – charge exchange with bare sulfur ions. Astron. Astrophys.584, 11 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527634

  13. [13]

    Gu, L., Mao, Junjie, de Plaa, Jelle, Raassen, A. J. J., Shah, Chintan, Kaastra, Jelle S.: Charge exchange in galaxy clusters. Astron. Astrophys.611, 26 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731861

  14. [14]

    Space Sci

    Gu, L., Zhuravleva, I., Churazov, E., Paerels, F., Kaastra, J., Yamaguchi, H.: X- Ray spectroscopy of galaxy clusters: Beyond the CIE modeling. Space Sci. Rev. 214(7), 108 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0544-z

  15. [15]

    DARK MATTER

    Shah, C., Dobrodey, S., Bernitt, S., Steinbrügge, R., López-Urrutia, J.R.C., Gu, L., Kaastra, J.: LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS COMPELLINGLY SUP- PORT A CHARGE-EXCHANGE MECHANISM FOR THE “DARK MATTER” ∼3.5keVX-RAYLINE.Astrophys.J.833(1),52(2016)https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/833/1/52

  16. [16]

    Astrophys

    Katsuda, S., Tsunemi, H., Mori, K., Uchida, H., Kosugi, H., Kimura, M., Nakajima, H., Takakura, S., Petre, R., Hewitt, J.W., Yamaguchi, H.: POS- SIBLE CHARGE-EXCHANGEX-RAY EMISSION IN THE CYGNUS LOOP DETECTED WITH SUZAKU. Astrophys. J.730(1), 24 (2011) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0004-637x/730/1/24

  17. [17]

    Astrophys

    Katsuda, S., Tsunemi, H., Mori, K., Uchida, H., Petre, R., Yamada, S., Akamatsu, H., Konami, S., Tamagawa, T.: HIGH-RESOLUTION X-RAY SPEC- TROSCOPY OF THE GALACTIC SUPERNOVA REMNANT PUPPIS A WITH XMM-NEWTON/RGS. Astrophys. J.756(1), 49 (2012) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/49

  18. [18]

    J.787(2), 31 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/787/2/l31

    Cumbee, R.S., Henley, D.B., Stancil, P.C., Shelton, R.L., Nolte, J.L., Wu, Y., Schultz, D.R.: CAN CHARGE EXCHANGE EXPLAIN ANOMALOUS SOFT X-RAY EMISSION IN THE CYGNUS LOOP? Astrophys. J.787(2), 31 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/787/2/l31

  19. [19]

    Astrophys

    Uchida, H., Katsuda, S., Tsunemi, H., Mori, K., Gu, L., Cumbee, R.S., Petre, R., Tanaka, T.: High forbidden-to-resonance line ratio of O VII discovered from the Cygnus Loop. Astrophys. J.871(2), 234 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aaf8a6 23

  20. [20]

    Astrophys

    Bulbul, E., Markevitch, M., Foster, A., Smith, R.K., Loewenstein, M., Ran- dall, S.W.: DETECTION OF AN UNIDENTIFIED EMISSION LINE IN THE STACKED X-RAY SPECTRUM OF GALAXY CLUSTERS. Astrophys. J. 789(1), 13 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/789/1/13

  21. [21]

    Boyarsky, A., Ruchayskiy, O., Iakubovskyi, D., Franse, J.: Unidentified line in X- Ray spectra of the Andromeda Galaxy and Perseus Galaxy Cluster. Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 251301 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.251301

  22. [22]

    Abazajian, K., Fuller, G.M., Patel, M.: Sterile Neutrino hot, warm, and cold dark matter. Phys. Rev. D64, 023501 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64. 023501

  23. [23]

    J.725(2), 131–134 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 2041-8205/725/2/l131

    Prokhorov, D., Silk, J.: CAN THE EXCESS IN THE Fe XXVI LyγLINE FROM THE GALACTIC CENTER PROVIDE EVIDENCE FOR 17 keV STERILE NEUTRINOS? Astrophys. J.725(2), 131–134 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 2041-8205/725/2/l131

  24. [24]

    The Astrophysical Journal 634(1), 687 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/496874

    Wargelin, B.J., Beiersdorfer, P., Neill, P.A., Olson, R.E., Scofield, J.H.: Charge- exchange spectra of hydrogenic and He-like Iron. The Astrophysical Journal 634(1), 687 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/496874

  25. [25]

    In: Bambi, C., Jiang, J

    Gu, L., Shah, C.: Charge exchange in X-Ray astrophysics. In: Bambi, C., Jiang, J. (eds.) High-Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy: Instrumentation, Data Analysis, and Science, pp. 255–289. Springer, Singapore (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-981-99-4409-5

  26. [26]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society508(2), 2194–2203 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2537

    Liang, G.Y., Zhu, J., Zhao, G., Kaastra, J.S., Gu, L.: Charge-exchange soft X- ray emission of highly charged ions with inclusion of multiple-electron capture. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society508(2), 2194–2203 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2537

  27. [27]

    Beiersdorfer, P., Olson, R.E., Brown, G.V., Chen, H., Harris, C.L., Neill, P.A., Schweikhard, L., Utter, S.B., Widmann, K.: X-ray emission following low-energy charge exchange collisions of highly charged ions. Phys. Rev. A85, 5090–5093 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5090

  28. [28]

    Leutenegger, M.A., Beiersdorfer, P., Brown, G.V., Kelley, R.L., Kilbourne, C.A., Porter, F.S.: Measurement of anomalously strong emission from the1s−9ptran- sition in the spectrum of h-like phosphorus following charge exchange with molecular hydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 063201 (2010) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.105.063201

  29. [29]

    Leutenegger, M.A., Betancourt-Martinez, G.L., Beiersdorfer, P., Brown, G.V., Kelley, R.L., Kilbourne, C.A., Porter, F.S.: Charge exchange measurements with an X-ray calorimeter at an electron beam ion trap. Physica. Scr.T156, 014006 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2013/t156/014006 24

  30. [30]

    Astrophys

    Betancourt-Martinez, G.L., Beiersdorfer, P., Brown, G.V., Cumbee, R.S., Hell, N., Kelley, R.L., Kilbourne, C.A., Leutenegger, M.A., Lockard, T.E., Porter, F.S.: High-resolution charge exchange spectra with l-shell nickel show striking dif- ferences from models. Astrophys. J.868(2), 17 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/aaef82

  31. [31]

    Gu, L., Kaastra, Jelle, Raassen, A. J. J.: Plasma code for astrophysical charge exchangeemissionatX-raywavelengths.Astron.Astrophys.588,52(2016)https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527615

  32. [32]

    Astrophys

    Smith, R.K., Foster, A.R., Edgar, R.J., Brickhouse, N.S.: RESOLVING THE ORIGIN OF THE DIFFUSE SOFT X-RAY BACKGROUND. Astrophys. J. 787(1), 77 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/787/1/77

  33. [33]

    Astrophys

    Cumbee, R.S., Mullen, P.D., Lyons, D., Shelton, R.L., Fogle, M., Schultz, D.R., Stancil, P.C.: Charge exchange x-ray emission due to highly charged ion colli- sions with h, he, and h2: Line ratios for heliospheric and interstellar applications. Astrophys. J.852(1), 7 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa99d8

  34. [34]

    Beiersdorfer, P.: Highly charged ions in magnetic fusion plasmas: research oppor- tunities and diagnostic necessities. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys.48(14), 144017 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/48/14/144017

  35. [35]

    Lepson, J.K., Beiersdorfer, P., Bitter, M., Roquemore, A.L., Hill, K., Kaita, R.: Charge exchange produced emission of carbon in the extreme ultraviolet spec- tral region. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.583, 012012 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-6596/583/1/012012

  36. [36]

    Astrophys

    Mullen, P.D., Cumbee, R.S., Lyons, D., Stancil, P.C.: Charge Exchange-Induced X-Ray Emission of Fe XXV and Fe XXVI via a Streamlined Model. Astrophys. J. Suppl.224(2), 31 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/31

  37. [37]

    Gu, M.F.: The flexible atomic code. Can. J. Phys.86(5), 675–689 (2008) https: //doi.org/10.1139/p07-197

  38. [38]

    Ryufuku, H., Sasaki, K., Watanabe, T.: Oscillatory behavior of charge transfer cross sections as a function of the charge of projectiles in low-energy collisions. Phys. Rev. A21, 745–750 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.21.745

  39. [39]

    Niehaus, A.: A classical model for multiple-electron capture in slow collisions of highly charged ions with atoms. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.19(18), 2925–2937 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/19/18/021

  40. [40]

    Proceedings of the Physical Society88(4), 861–872 (1966) https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/88/4/306 25

    Abrines, R., Percival, I.C.: Classical theory of charge transfer and ionization of hydrogen atoms by protons. Proceedings of the Physical Society88(4), 861–872 (1966) https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/88/4/306 25

  41. [41]

    Olson, R.E., Salop, A.: Charge-transfer and impact-ionization cross sections for fully and partially stripped positive ions colliding with atomic hydrogen. Phys. Rev. A16, 531–541 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.16.531

  42. [42]

    Janev, R.K., Belić, D.S., Bransden, B.H.: Total and partial cross sections for electron capture in collisions of hydrogen atoms with fully stripped ions. Phys. Rev. A28, 1293–1302 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.28.1293

  43. [43]

    Fritsch, W., Lin, C.D.: The semiclassical close-coupling description of atomic collisions:Recentdevelopmentsandresults.Phys.Rep.202(1),1–97(1991)https: //doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(91)90008-A

  44. [44]

    Shimakura, N., Suzuki, S., Kimura, M.: Molecular treatment of electron capture in collisions ofo5+ ions with h atoms at energies from 6 ev/amu to 10 kev/amu: Transfer-excitation processes. Phys. Rev. A48, 3652–3662 (1993) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevA.48.3652

  45. [45]

    Astrophys

    Butler, S.E., Dalgarno, A.: Charge transfer of multiply charged ions with hydro- gen and helium Landau-Zener calculations. Astrophys. J.241, 838–843 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1086/158395

  46. [46]

    Olson, R.E., Salop, A.: Electron transfer between multicharged ions and neutral species. Phys. Rev. A14, 579–585 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.14. 579

  47. [47]

    Taulbjerg, K.: Reaction windows for electron capture by highly charged ions. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.19(10), 367–372 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0022-3700/19/10/007

  48. [48]

    Janev, R.K., Winter, H.: State-selective electron capture in atom-highly charged ion collisions. Phys. Reports117(5), 265–387 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-1573(85)90118-8

  49. [49]

    Ralchenko, Reader, J., and NIST ASD Team: NIST Atomic Spectra Database

    Kramida, A., Yu. Ralchenko, Reader, J., and NIST ASD Team: NIST Atomic Spectra Database. NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.7.1), [Online]. Avail- able:https://physics.nist.gov/asd[2019, December 6]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. (2019)

  50. [50]

    Astrophys

    Beiersdorfer,P.,Lisse,C.M.,Olson,R.E.,Brown,G.V.,Chen,H.:X-rayvelocime- try of solar wind ion impact on comets. Astrophys. J.549(1), 147–150 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/319143

  51. [51]

    Allen, F.I., Biedermann, C., Radtke, R., Fussmann, G., Fritzsche, S.: Energy dependence of angular momentum capture states in charge exchange collisions between slow highly charged argon ions and argon neutrals. Phys. Rev. A78, 032705 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032705 26

  52. [53]

    IEEE Trans

    Currell, F., Fussmann, G.: Physics of electron beam ion traps and sources. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.33(6), 1763–1777 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2005. 860072

  53. [54]

    PhD dis- sertation, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg (2010)

    Ginzel, R.: Interaction of low-energy highly charged ions with matter. PhD dis- sertation, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg (2010). https://hdl.handle.net/ 11858/00-001M-0000-0011-711C-6

  54. [55]

    Mas- ter’s thesis, Imperial College London (2009)

    Higgins, S.: Implementation of a deceleration beamline for the inves- tigation of charge exchange processes using highly charged ions. Mas- ter’s thesis, Imperial College London (2009). https://hdl.handle.net/11858/ 00-001M-0000-0011-76FC-A

  55. [56]

    In: AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division

    Gu, M., Beiersdorfer, P., Brown, G., Chen, H., Clementson, J., Thorn, D., Boyce, K., Kelley, R., Kilbourne, C., Porter, F.S.: Target-Projectile Interaction model for describing spectral line emission following charge exchange at low interac- tion energies. In: AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division. AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, vol. 19, pp. 110–58 (2022)

  56. [57]

    Bodewits, D., Hoekstra, R.: Electron capture in collisions betweeno 6+ ions andh 2Omolecules. Phys. Rev. A76, 032703 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.76.032703

  57. [58]

    Atoms7, 17 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/ atoms7010017

    Bodewits, D., Hoekstra, R.: Charge-exchange emission from hydrogen-like carbon ions colliding with water molecules. Atoms7, 17 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/ atoms7010017

  58. [59]

    Tanuma, H., Ohashi, H., Yamamoto, N., Kato, D., Murakami, I., Fujioka, S., Nishimura, H., Nishihara, K.: Charge-exchange EUV spectroscopy in collisions of Xeq+ (q= 7− −9) with rare gases. Phys. Rev. A84, 042713 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042713

  59. [60]

    Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables55(2), 201–232 (1993) https: //doi.org/10.1006/adnd.1993.1021

    Janev, R.K., Phaneuf, R.A., Tawara, H., Shirai, T.: Recommended cross sections for state-selective electron capture in collisions of c6+ and o8+ ions with atomic hydrogen. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables55(2), 201–232 (1993) https: //doi.org/10.1006/adnd.1993.1021

  60. [61]

    Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics45(23), 235201 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/45/ 27 23/235201

    Wu, Y., Stancil, P.C., Schultz, D.R., Hui, Y., Liebermann, H.P., Buenker, R.J.: Theoretical investigation of total and state-dependent charge exchange in O6+ collisions with atomic hydrogen. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics45(23), 235201 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/45/ 27 23/235201

  61. [62]

    Astrophys

    Ali, R., Neill, P.A., Beiersdorfer, P., Harris, C.L., Raković, M.J., Wang, J.G., Schultz, D.R., Stancil, P.C.: On the significance of the contribution of multiple- electron capture processes to cometary x-ray emission. Astrophys. J.629(2), 125–128 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/447768

  62. [63]

    Fischer, D., Feuerstein, B., DuBois, R.D., Moshammer, R., Crespo L´opez- Urrutia, J.R., Draganic, I., Lörch, H., Perumal, A.N., Ullrich, J.: State-resolved measurements of single-electron capture in slow Ne7+- and Ne8+-helium colli- sions.JournalofPhysicsB:Atomic,MolecularandOpticalPhysics35,1369–1377 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/35/5/318

  63. [64]

    Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics41(19), 195203 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/41/ 19/195203

    Knoop, S., Fischer, D., Xue, Y., Zapukhlyak, M., Osborne, C.J., Ergler, T., Ferger, T., Braun, J., Brenner, G., Bruhns, H., Dimopoulou, C., Epp, S.W., Martínez, A.J.G., Sikler, G., Orts, R.S., Tawara, H., Kirchner, T., López-Urrutia, J.R.C., Moshammer, R., Ullrich, J., Hoekstra, R.: Single-electron capture in keV Ar15+...18+ + He collisions. Journal of Ph...

  64. [65]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series388(8), 082050 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/388/8/082050

    Kelkar, A.H., Wang, X., Fischer, D., Moshammer, R., Ullrich, J.: Kinemati- cally complete measurements for electron capture in collision of kev energy ions with atomic and molecular targets. Journal of Physics: Conference Series388(8), 082050 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/388/8/082050

  65. [66]

    Xue, Y., Ginzel, R., Krauß, A., Bernitt, S., Schöffler, M., Kühnel, K.U., López- Urrutia, J.R.C., Moshammer, R., Cai, X., Ullrich, J., Fischer, D.: Kinematically complete study of electron transfer and rearrangement processes in slowar16+-Ne collisions. Phys. Rev. A90, 052720 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 90.052720

  66. [67]

    Astrophys

    Ali, R., Neill, P.A., Beiersdorfer, P., Harris, C.L., Schultz, D.R., Stancil, P.C.: CRITICAL TEST OF SIMULATIONS OF CHARGE-EXCHANGE-INDUCED X-RAY EMISSION IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM. Astrophys. J.716(2), 95–98 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/716/2/l95

  67. [68]

    Ali, R., Beiersdorfer, P., Harris, C.L., Neill, P.A.: Charge-exchange X-ray spectra: Evidence for significant contributions from radiative decays of doubly excited states. Phys. Rev. A93, 012711 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93. 012711

  68. [69]

    International Journal of Modern Physics D31(02), 2230001 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218271822300014

    Tashiro, M.S.: XRISM: X-ray imaging and spectroscopy mission. International Journal of Modern Physics D31(02), 2230001 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218271822300014

  69. [70]

    28 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan77(Supplement1), 1–31 (2025)

    Tashiro, M., XRISM Science Team: X-Ray imaging and spectroscopy mission. 28 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan77(Supplement1), 1–31 (2025)

  70. [71]

    In: Herder, J.-W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakazawa, K

    Tashiro, M.S., Watanabe, S., Maejima, H., Yoshida, T.,et al.: Development and operation status of X-Ray imaging and spectroscopy mission (XRISM). In: Herder, J.-W.A., Nikzad, S., Nakazawa, K. (eds.) Space Telescopes and Instru- mentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray. Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 13093, p. 130931 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3019325

  71. [72]

    Athena+: The first Deep Universe X-ray Observatory

    Barret, D., Nandra, K., Barcons, X., Fabian, A., Herder, J.-W., Piro, L., Watson, M., Aird, J., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Cappi, M., Carrera, F., Comastri, A., Costantini, E., Croston, J., Decourchelle, A., Done, C., Dovciak, M., Ettori, S., Finoguenov, A., Georgakakis, A., Jonker, P., Kaastra, J., Matt, G., Motch, C., O’Brien, P., Pareschi, G., Pointecoute...

  72. [73]

    Nature Astronomy9, 36–44 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-024-02416-3 29

    Cruise, M., Guainazzi, M., Aird, J., Carrera, F.J., Costantini, E., Corrales, L., Dauser, T., Eckert, D., Gastaldello, F., Matsumoto, H., Osten, R., Petrucci, P.- O., Porquet, D., Pratt, G.W., Rea, N., Reiprich, T.H., Simionescu, A., Spiga, D., Troja, E.: The NewAthena mission concept in the context of the next decade of X-ray astronomy. Nature Astronomy9...