REVIEW 1 cited by
Supporting AI-Augmented Meta-Decision Making with InDecision
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
From school admissions to hiring and investment decisions, the first step behind many high-stakes decision-making processes is "deciding how to decide." Formulating effective criteria to guide decision-making requires an iterative process of exploration, reflection, and discovery. Yet, this process remains under-supported in practice. In this short paper, we outline an opportunity space for AI-driven tools that augment human meta-decision making. We draw upon prior literature to propose a set of design goals for future AI tools aimed at supporting human meta-decision making. We then illustrate these ideas through InDecision, a mixed-initiative tool designed to support the iterative development of decision criteria. Based on initial findings from designing and piloting InDecision with users, we discuss future directions for AI-augmented meta-decision making.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI: A Synthesis of the CHI 2025 Tools for Thought Workshop
A synthesis of the CHI 2025 workshop maps research and design opportunities for understanding, protecting, and augmenting human cognition with generative AI.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.