Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dynamic classifier auditing by unsupervised anomaly detection methods: an application in packaging industry predictive maintenance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.11960 v1 pith:Y2SISHSX submitted 2024-05-20 cs.CE

classification cs.CE
keywords maintenanceanomalymachinesclassifierdetectionmachinemethodspackaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Predictive maintenance in manufacturing industry applications is a challenging research field. Packaging machines are widely used in a large number of logistic companies' warehouses and must be working uninterruptedly. Traditionally, preventive maintenance strategies have been carried out to improve the performance of these machines. However, this kind of policies does not take into account the information provided by the sensors implemented in the machines. This paper presents an expert system for the automatic estimation of work orders to implement predictive maintenance policies for packaging machines. The key idea is that, from a set of alarms related to sensors implemented in the machine, the expert system should take a maintenance action while optimizing the response time. The work order estimator will act as a classifier, yielding a binary decision of whether a machine must undergo a maintenance action by a technician or not, followed by an unsupervised anomaly detection-based filtering stage to audit the classifier's output. The methods used for anomaly detection were: One-Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM), Minimum Covariance Determinant (MCD) and a majority (hard) voting ensemble of them. All anomaly detection methods improve the performance of the baseline classifer but the best performance in terms of F1 score was obtained by the majority voting ensemble.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools