Incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier limit from a nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck equation

Byung-Hoon Hwang; Ju-Hwan Hyun; Young-Pil Choi

Incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier limit from a nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck equation

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The diffusive limit of a nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck equation is the incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier system.

desk verdict A genuinely new INSF limit from a nonlinear quantum Fokker–Planck model, and the flagged dispersive gap is not real; the main caveat is heavy reliance on the companion paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27583 v1 pith:Y33CFIT7 submitted 2026-07-30 math.AP

Young-Pil Choi , Byung-Hoon Hwang , Ju-Hwan Hyun This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35Q2035Q3082C4035B40

keywords nonlinearquantumFokker-PlanckequationincompressibleNavier-Stokes-FourierlimitBose-EinsteinandFermi-Diracstatisticsdiffusivescalinghydrodynamicacousticwavestransportcoefficientsequilibrium

topics Navier-Stokes Regularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck equation, whose collision frequency, bulk velocity, and temperature are self-consistently determined by the distribution, has a rigorous hydrodynamic limit. Under the diffusive scaling with the quantum parameter held fixed and initial data near the global quantum equilibrium, the rescaled solutions converge (up to a subsequence) to a limit whose macroscopic moments obey the incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier system, with density and temperature connected by the Boussinesq relation. The microscopic part relaxes strongly, the acoustic modes vanish locally, and the viscosity and thermal diffusivity are determined by solving auxiliary equations for the linearized quantum Fokker-Planck operator, so the quantum statistics survive in the transport coefficients. The result matters because it gives a rigorous fluid limit from a quantum kinetic model, showing that Bose-Einstein or Fermi-Dirac statistics are compatible with classical fluid behavior in the diffusive regime.

What carries the argument

The argument combines a macro-micro decomposition around the global quantum equilibrium F_ℏ with the diffusive rescaling. The linearized collision operator L has a spectral gap on the orthogonal complement of its null space N, spanned by the five quantum-weighted modes √µ_ℏ, p√µ_ℏ, |p|²√µ_ℏ; this coercivity forces the microscopic component (I−P)g^ε to vanish. The limiting fluxes are identified by solving the microscopic auxiliary equations L eA = A and L eB = B on N⊥ via Lax-Milgram, and by expanding the local quantum equilibrium manifold to second order, which produces the quadratic convection terms. Acoustic modes are controlled by a local dispersive estimate for the fast half-wave propaga

What would settle it

Directly compute ∥χ e^{±i c s Λ} J_{δ,N} h∥_{L^2(R_s × R_x^3)} for a smooth compactly supported h whose Fourier transform avoids ξ = 0. The proof uses a Plancherel identity in s treating the time-Fourier transform of e^{i c s |ξ|}, a Dirac measure δ(σ − c|ξ|), as an L^2 function; evaluating the double integral would show whether the claimed bound actually holds, and if it diverges, Lemma 4.2 is false and the acoustic-mode vanishing is unproved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 states that, for small initial data in H^s (s ≥ 4), the rescaled perturbation g^ε satisfies (I−P)g^ε → 0 strongly and the hydrodynamic moments converge, up to a subsequence, to (u, ϑ) solving ∂_t u + (1/m_2) u·∇u + ∇p = ν_ℏ Δu, ∇·u = 0, ∂_t ϑ + (1/m_2) u·∇ϑ = κ_ℏ Δϑ, with ϱ = −ϑ. The limiting distribution is the infinitesimal quantum equilibrium associated with the fixed global equilibrium, not the classical Maxwellian. The positive transport coefficients ν_ℏ and κ_ℏ are defined through the microscopic auxiliary equations L eA = A and L eB = B, and the quantum-adapted thermal mode q^ε = (ϑ^ε − βϱ^ε)/(1+β) together with the solenoidal velocity converge strongly in local Sobolev sp

Load-bearing premise

The proof leans on Lemma 4.2's claim that fast acoustic waves vanish locally; that lemma is justified in Appendix A by a Plancherel-type computation in the time variable for the half-wave propagator that is not valid for the distributions involved, so the local decay of acoustic modes is the load-bearing unproven step.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier system is the universal macroscopic equation for this quantum Fokker-Planck model in the diffusive regime.
Quantum statistics enter the fluid coefficients: ν_ℏ and κ_ℏ depend on the fixed equilibrium through the auxiliary equations, so Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac corrections are not averaged out.
The Boussinesq relation ϱ = −ϑ couples density and temperature fluctuations in the limit, a direct consequence of the quantum-weighted moment structure.
Strong convergence of the divergence-free velocity and the quantum-adapted thermal mode q^ε justifies the nonlinear terms, while acoustic modes vanish locally by dispersion.
The formal semiclassical limits ν_ℏ → 1/(2M_cl) and κ_ℏ → 1/(3M_cl) as ℏ → 0 are expected but not proved; the paper treats the fixed-ℏ regime only.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the local dispersive estimate for the half-wave propagator in Lemma 4.2 fails, the acoustic modes might not vanish locally, and the limiting passage would require a different mechanism, such as periodic boundary conditions or a stronger damping.
The quadratic equilibrium-expansion technique could extend to other self-consistent quantum kinetic models, provided a spectral gap and an acoustic dispersive bound are available.
A testable extension is to compute ν_ℏ and κ_ℏ explicitly for small ℏ and check the claimed semiclassical rates, which would confirm the quantum-to-classical transition of the transport coefficients.
On tori or bounded domains, where compact embeddings hold directly, the dispersive estimate might be bypassed, though the quantum equilibrium manifold and auxiliary equations would still be central.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a solid and genuinely new result: the first incompressible Navier–Stokes–Fourier limit from the nonlinear quantum Fokker–Planck equation (1.1) with fixed ℏ. It is not a superficial adaptation of the classical Vlasov–Fokker–Planck or Boltzmann–Fermi–Dirac arguments. The quantum-weighted moments, the auxiliary equations for the linearized operator, and the quantum-adapted thermal mode are real new ingredients. The limiting coefficients ν_ℏ and κ_ℏ are defined through auxiliary problems, not tuned to match the target system. The proof follows the standard macro–micro decomposition and is careful about the places where quantum statistics change the algebra.

I checked the one point the reader flagged. The concern about Appendix A.2 does not survive. The Plancherel step in (A.5) is applied to z(s,x) = ∫ e^{icsρ} F(x,ρ) dρ, where F(x,ρ) is a compactly supported L² amplitude in ρ for each fixed x. This is an ordinary L² Fourier transform, not a distributional one. The distribution objection would be correct only if one Fourier-transformed pointwise in ξ without integrating against an amplitude, which is not what the proof does. So Lemma 4.2 is fine, and the acoustic vanishing is established.

The real soft spot is self-containedness. Several key estimates—the global well-posedness, the coercivity of the linearized operator, and parts of the nonlinear energy argument—are imported from the companion paper [6]. The authors state this clearly, and for a sequel that may be acceptable, but a referee will want to verify that [6] indeed supplies exactly the needed statements. The paper is also very long and technical, with some estimates only sketched (e.g., Proposition 2.1 says 'we only indicate the modifications' and refers to [6]). The assumptions are standard: small data, s≥4, and one assumes the initial macroscopic moments converge, which avoids the initial-layer question. That is a deliberate scope choice, not a flaw.

Overall, the central argument holds up. The theorem is new, the method is coherent, and the transport coefficients are genuine outputs. This paper deserves a serious referee. I'd send it with a request that the authors either include the needed statements from [6] as an appendix or verify the transfer of the estimates in detail. The result is important enough in kinetic theory to warrant the effort.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives the incompressible Navier–Stokes–Fourier system as the diffusive limit (ε→0, ℏ fixed) of the nonlinear quantum Fokker–Planck equation introduced in [6]. Writing f^ε = F_ℏ + ε√μ g^ε, the authors prove uniform energy estimates, strong relaxation of the microscopic component (I−P)g^ε, local conservation laws, the incompressibility and Boussinesq constraints, strong compactness of the solenoidal velocity and the quantum-adapted thermal mode, and the vanishing of acoustic modes via a local dispersive estimate. The limiting momentum and temperature equations are identified through auxiliary problems L eA = A, L eB = B, yielding explicit quantum-dependent viscosity and thermal diffusivity. Theorem 1.1 states the convergence precisely, including initial-data identification and strong local convergence of the physically relevant modes.

Significance. The result appears to be the first rigorous incompressible Navier–Stokes–Fourier limit for a nonlinear quantum Fokker–Planck model with the quantum parameter kept fixed. The proof combines the standard macro–micro decomposition with model-specific elements: the quantum-adapted thermal variable q, the second-order local-equilibrium expansion used to extract the convective fluxes, and the acoustic dispersive lemma. The transport coefficients are given by explicit spectral formulas, not fitted parameters, which is a strength. I checked the disputed Plancherel step in Appendix A.2 and find the argument valid: the time-Fourier transform is applied to an L² amplitude F(x,ρ) with compact support in ρ, so the distributional objection raised in the reading note does not apply. The main caveat is the paper's reliance on the companion work [6] for global well-posedness, coercivity, and several nonlinear estimates.

minor comments (5)

[§2.2, Theorem 2.1; §4.1, Lemma 4.1] The paper depends on the companion paper [6] for the global well-posedness theorem, the coercivity estimate (2.3), and the nonlinear estimates in Lemma 2.1. Since these are load-bearing for the main result, please state explicitly which results from [6] are used and, if [6] is not yet published, include the necessary statements or proofs. This is a self-containedness limitation rather than an internal gap, but it should be addressed.
[§4.1, after the definition of H] The claim that the D-norm controls the L²_p norm on N⊥ is used to set up the Lax–Milgram argument. This follows from a Gaussian/Poincaré inequality for functions orthogonal to the null space, but the proof is omitted. A short justification would improve readability.
[§4.3.1, Eq. (4.23)] The derivation of L k[h] + Γ2(h) = 0 by expanding the local equilibrium family is written as a formal calculation. The identity is plausible and consistent with the definition of Γ2, but the paper does not show the coefficient matching. Please include the intermediate expansion or state that it is verified by direct computation.
[Appendix A.2, Eq. (A.5)] To preempt the distributional objection, it would help to explicitly define F(x,ρ) = ρ² ∫_{S²} e^{i ρ x·ω} Ĵ_{δ,N}h(ρω) dω and to note that F is compactly supported in ρ and square-integrable. Then the Plancherel step in s is applied to a genuine L² function, not to the distribution e^{i c s |ξ|}. This is a presentation issue; the argument as written is correct.
[Notation throughout] The symbol P is used both for the L²_p projection onto ker L (Section 1) and for the Leray projection onto divergence-free fields (Section 3.4). This is a source of potential confusion in Section 4. Consider using, for example, Π for the null-space projection and P for the Leray projection.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the fluid limit derivation is not equivalent to its inputs.

full rationale

The claimed Navier-Stokes-Fourier system (1.8) is not assumed as an input. The limiting variables u and ϑ are obtained as weak-* limits of the hydrodynamic moments (3.6), the constraint ∇·u=0 follows from the mass equation in (3.14), and the Boussinesq relation ϱ+ϑ=0 is derived from the momentum equation using the microscopic decay of ⟨(I−P)g^ε,A⟩ (3.17)-(3.19). The transport coefficients ν_ℏ and κ_ℏ are defined through the independent auxiliary problems L eA=A, L eB=B (Lemma 4.1, equations (4.1), (4.7)) and enter the flux identities (4.8)-(4.9) through explicit computations (4.36)-(4.39), not by fitting the coefficients to the target PDE. The quantum-adapted thermal variable q^ε is a linear combination introduced after the conservation laws, and its limit is identified with ϑ only after using the Boussinesq relation; thus the thermal mode is not defined to be the limiting temperature. The acoustic vanishing lemma (4.2) is a general linear dispersive statement proved by a separate frequency-localization and half-wave argument in Appendix A; whether or not that proof is fully correct, it does not reduce to the target result. The paper does rely on the companion paper [6] for the model's well-posedness, coercivity of L, and some nonlinear estimates, but this is ordinary use of prior independent results rather than a circular reduction: no fitted parameter, definitional identity, or self-citation chain forces the limit system. No circular step meeting the required evidence threshold was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data. The quantum equilibrium F_ℏ, the parameter θ*, and the quantum parameter ℏ are model inputs. The auxiliary functions eA, eB are mathematical constructs solving L eA=A, L eB=B; they are not proposed physical entities.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck equation (1.1) is the correct kinetic model, introduced in [6].
The paper derives the hydrodynamic limit of (1.1); the model itself is taken as given, with a formal derivation from the quantum Landau operator cited to the authors' companion paper [6].
domain assumption Global perturbative well-posedness and uniform energy estimates from [6].
Theorem 2.1 and Proposition 2.1 are built on [6, Lemmas 4.3, 5.2, 5.3, 5.7, 5.8], which are not reproduced here.
domain assumption Microscopic coercivity (spectral gap) of L: -<Lg,g> ≥ λ_ℏ |(I-P)g|_D^2.
Quoted from [6, Lemma 3.2]; all dissipative estimates rely on this gap.
domain assumption The equilibrium condition ℏ e^{-θ*} < 1.
Ensures positivity and exponential decay of F_ℏ, μ_ℏ, η_ℏ, stated in (1.4).
domain assumption Regularity and smallness of initial data: s≥4, δ_in sufficiently small, plus nonnegativity and Pauli bound for fermions.
Needed for the perturbative global existence and the macro-micro decomposition.
standard math Radial symmetry and moment identities (4.19)–(4.21).
Follows from the radial structure of μ_ℏ.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier limit from a nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y33CFIT7

@misc{pith2026260727583,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier limit from a nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y33CFIT7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27583}
}

read the original abstract

We derive the incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier limit from a nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck equation with Bose-Einstein or Fermi-Dirac statistics. The model has a self-consistent collision structure, with the local density acting as the collision frequency and the bulk velocity and temperature determined by nonlinear quantum-weighted moments of the distribution. We work near a global quantum equilibrium under the diffusive scaling and keep the quantum parameter fixed. Uniform estimates with respect to the Knudsen number yield strong microscopic relaxation and identify the limiting infinitesimal quantum equilibrium. Using the local conservation laws, we prove the incompressibility condition, the Boussinesq relation, and strong compactness of the divergence-free velocity component and a quantum-adapted thermal mode, while the acoustic modes vanish locally by a dispersive estimate. The limiting viscous stress tensor and heat flux are identified by solving auxiliary equations for the linearized quantum Fokker-Planck operator and by expanding the local quantum equilibrium manifold. The resulting incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier system retains the effect of quantum statistics through its normalization constants and transport coefficients.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

[6]

Choi, B.-H

Y.-P. Choi, B.-H. Hwang, and J.-H. Hyun. Nonlinear quantum Fokker–Planck equation near equilibrium, arXiv:2607.26433

arXiv
[1]

Arlotti and M

L. Arlotti and M. Lachowicz. Euler and Navier-Stokes limits of the Uehling-Uhlenbeck quantum kinetic equations.J. Math. Phys., 38(7):3571–3588, 1997

1997
[2]

Bardos, F

C. Bardos, F. c. Golse, and D. Levermore. Fluid dynamic limits of kinetic equations. I. Formal derivations.J. Statist. Phys., 63(1-2):323–344, 1991

1991
[3]

Bardos, F

C. Bardos, F. c. Golse, and D. Levermore. Fluid dynamic limits of kinetic equations. II. Convergence proofs for the Boltzmann equation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 46(5):667–753, 1993

1993
[4]

Carrapatoso, M

K. Carrapatoso, M. Rachid, and I. Tristani. Regularization estimates and hydrodynamical limit for the Landau equation. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 163:334–432, 2022

2022
[5]

Cercignani, R

C. Cercignani, R. Illner, and M. Pulvirenti.The mathematical theory of dilute gases, volume 106 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994. INCOMPRESSIBLE NA VIER–STOKES–FOURIER LIMIT FROM QUANTUM FOKKER–PLANCK 29

1994
[7]

Choi and J

Y.-P. Choi and J. Jung. Incompressible Navier-Stokes limit from nonlinear Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation.Appl. Math. Lett., 158:Paper No. 109214, 7, 2024

2024
[8]

Choi and J

Y.-P. Choi and J. Jung. Incompressible Euler limits from a nonlinear Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation with constant tem- perature.Appl. Math. Lett., 172:Paper No. 109721, 6, 2026

2026

Show all 28 references

[9]

Desvillettes and V

L. Desvillettes and V. Ricci. A rigorous derivation of a linear kinetic equation of Fokker-Planck type in the limit of grazing collisions.J. Statist. Phys., 104(5-6):1173–1189, 2001

2001
[10]

P. Gervais. Incompressible Navier-Stokes limit of non-bilinear kinetic equations and application to the BGK, nonlinear Fokker-Planck and Boltzmann-Fermi-Dirac equations, arXiv:2607.18939

arXiv
[11]

Gervais and B

P. Gervais and B. Lods. Hydrodynamic limits for kinetic equations preserving mass, momentum and energy: a spectral and unified approach in the presence of a spectral gap.Ann. H. Lebesgue, 7:969–1098, 2024

2024
[12]

F. c. Golse and L. Saint-Raymond. The Navier-Stokes limit of the Boltzmann equation for bounded collision kernels.Invent. Math., 155(1):81–161, 2004

2004
[13]

F. c. Golse and L. Saint-Raymond. The incompressible Navier-Stokes limit of the Boltzmann equation for hard cutoff potentials.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 91(5):508–552, 2009

2009
[14]

T. Goudon. On Boltzmann equations and Fokker-Planck asymptotics: influence of grazing collisions.J. Statist. Phys., 89(3-4):751–776, 1997

1997
[15]

Jiang, C

N. Jiang, C. Wang, and K. Zhou. The incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier limits from Boltzmann-Fermi-Dirac equation for low regularity data.J. Differential Equations, 467:Paper No. 114262, 52, 2026

2026
[16]

Jiang, L

N. Jiang, L. Xiong, and K. Zhou. The incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier limit from Boltzmann-Fermi-Dirac equation. J. Differential Equations, 308:77–129, 2022

2022
[17]

Jiang, C.-J

N. Jiang, C.-J. Xu, and H. Zhao. Incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier limit from the Boltzmann equation: classical solutions.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 67(5):1817–1855, 2018

2018
[18]

Jiang and K

N. Jiang and K. Zhou. The compressible Euler and acoustic limits from quantum Boltzmann equation with Fermi-Dirac statistics.Comm. Math. Phys., 405(2):Paper No. 23, 58, 2024

2024
[19]

Kaniadakis

G. Kaniadakis. Generalized Boltzmann equation describing the dynamics of bosons and fermions.Phys. Lett. A, 203(4):229– 234, 1995

1995
[20]

C. D. Levermore and N. Masmoudi. From the Boltzmann equation to an incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier system. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 196(3):753–809, 2010

2010
[21]

Luo and X

L. Luo and X. Zhang. Global classical solutions for quantum kinetic Fokker-Planck equations.Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.), 35(1):140–156, 2015

2015
[22]

M´ etivier and S

G. M´ etivier and S. Schochet. The incompressible limit of the non-isentropic Euler equations.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 158(1):61–90, 2001

2001
[23]

Neumann and C

L. Neumann and C. Sparber. Stability of steady states in kinetic Fokker-Planck equations for bosons and fermions.Com- mun. Math. Sci., 5(4):765–777, 2007

2007
[24]

M. Rachid. Incompressible Navier-Stokes-Fourier limit from the Landau equation.Kinet. Relat. Models, 14(4):599–638, 2021

2021
[25]

Saint-Raymond.Hydrodynamic limits of the Boltzmann equation, volume 1971 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics

L. Saint-Raymond.Hydrodynamic limits of the Boltzmann equation, volume 1971 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009

1971
[26]

Schochet

S. Schochet. Fast singular limits of hyperbolic PDEs.J. Differential Equations, 114(2):476–512, 1994

1994
[27]

C. Villani. On the spatially homogeneous Landau equation for Maxwellian molecules.Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 8(6):957–983, 1998

1998
[28]

C. Villani. A review of mathematical topics in collisional kinetic theory. InHandbook of mathematical fluid dynamics, Vol. I, pages 71–305. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002. (Young-Pil Choi) Department of Mathematics, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul 03722, R...

2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [6]

Choi, B.-H

Y.-P. Choi, B.-H. Hwang, and J.-H. Hyun. Nonlinear quantum Fokker–Planck equation near equilibrium, arXiv:2607.26433

arXiv

[2] [1]

Arlotti and M

L. Arlotti and M. Lachowicz. Euler and Navier-Stokes limits of the Uehling-Uhlenbeck quantum kinetic equations.J. Math. Phys., 38(7):3571–3588, 1997

1997

[3] [2]

Bardos, F

C. Bardos, F. c. Golse, and D. Levermore. Fluid dynamic limits of kinetic equations. I. Formal derivations.J. Statist. Phys., 63(1-2):323–344, 1991

1991

[4] [3]

Bardos, F

C. Bardos, F. c. Golse, and D. Levermore. Fluid dynamic limits of kinetic equations. II. Convergence proofs for the Boltzmann equation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 46(5):667–753, 1993

1993

[5] [4]

Carrapatoso, M

K. Carrapatoso, M. Rachid, and I. Tristani. Regularization estimates and hydrodynamical limit for the Landau equation. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 163:334–432, 2022

2022

[6] [5]

Cercignani, R

C. Cercignani, R. Illner, and M. Pulvirenti.The mathematical theory of dilute gases, volume 106 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994. INCOMPRESSIBLE NA VIER–STOKES–FOURIER LIMIT FROM QUANTUM FOKKER–PLANCK 29

1994

[7] [7]

Choi and J

Y.-P. Choi and J. Jung. Incompressible Navier-Stokes limit from nonlinear Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation.Appl. Math. Lett., 158:Paper No. 109214, 7, 2024

2024

[8] [8]

Choi and J

Y.-P. Choi and J. Jung. Incompressible Euler limits from a nonlinear Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation with constant tem- perature.Appl. Math. Lett., 172:Paper No. 109721, 6, 2026

2026