REVIEW 1 cited by
Orthogonal calibration via posterior projections with applications to the Schwarzschild model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The orbital superposition method originally developed by Schwarzschild (1979) is used to study the dynamics of growth of a black hole and its host galaxy, and has uncovered new relationships between the galaxy's global characteristics. Scientists are specifically interested in finding optimal parameter choices for this model that best match physical measurements along with quantifying the uncertainty of such procedures. This renders a statistical calibration problem with multivariate outcomes. In this article, we develop a Bayesian method for calibration with multivariate outcomes using orthogonal bias functions thus ensuring parameter identifiability. Our approach is based on projecting the posterior to an appropriate space which allows the user to choose any nonparametric prior on the bias function(s) instead of having to model it (them) with Gaussian processes. We develop a functional projection approach using the theory of Hilbert spaces. A finite-dimensional analogue of the projection problem is also considered. We illustrate the proposed approach using a BART prior and apply it to calibrate the Schwarzschild model illustrating how a multivariate approach may resolve discrepancies resulting from a univariate calibration.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
HoloAegis: Frozen Representation, Topological Inference: Minimally Parametric Safety Manifolds for Zero-Shot LLM Guardrails
A frozen-encoder anchor-bank energy scorer for LLM safety achieves fast zero-shot moderation, but its own table shows the average accuracy is below baselines it compares against.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.