Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 105 references

Inverse probability weighting for auxiliary variable dependent sampling in observational studies of Long COVID

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that inverse probability weighting over attendance, sampling, completion, and exposure propensity corrects the bias of auxiliary-variable-dependent 'tiered' testing, changing the estimated Long COVID smell-loss difference…

desk verdict A useful, honest application of standard IPW to RECOVER's tiered-test design, whose main estimate rests on an untested monotone missingness assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04918 v1 pith:Y5JWB3UD submitted 2026-08-05 stat.ME stat.AP

Andrea S. Foulkes , Tanayott Thaweethai , Daniel O. Scharfstein , Weixing Huang , Harrison T. Reeder This is my paper · ORCID
classification stat.MEstat.AP MSC 62D0562P10
keywords LongCOVIDinverseprobabilityweightingtwo-phasesamplingauxiliaryvariabledependentobservationalcohortselectionbiasmissingdataRECOVER
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a single inverse-probability-weighting strategy can correct the selection bias introduced when observational cohorts administer expensive tier-2 tests to a subset of participants chosen according to auxiliary variables such as symptoms. It develops weighting recipes for two design variants: repeated sampling over visits with the exposure measured before sampling, as in RECOVER-Adult, and one-time sampling before the exposure is measured, as in RECOVER-Pediatrics. In the adult example, weighting for attendance, sampling, completion, and exposure propensity lowers the estimated prevalence of severe smell loss in both groups and reduces the Long COVID versus non-Long COVID difference from 11.2 to 6.3 percentage points (95% CI 1.3 to 11.3). The point is that ignoring the sampling mechanism can overstate how strongly Long COVID is tied to abnormal tiered-test results.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a product of inverse probabilities. For the adult design, each observed outcome at visit $k$ receives weight $1/(g_k^R \pi_k^A)$, where $g_k^R$ is the modeled probability of first completing the tiered test at visit $k$ — combining visit attendance, eligibility, sampling, and completion under a monotone missingness structure ($U_k=0$ implies $U_{k+1}=0$, at most one outcome per person) — and $\pi_k^A(a;W)=P(A_k=a|W)$ is the exposure propensity score defined for the entire cohort. Because the propensity score depends only on baseline covariates $W$ while attendance and sampling depend on auxiliary variables $Z$, the propensity model must be fitted with inverse weights $1/g_k^U$ so that the estimated propensity reflects the full cohort. Multiplying these inverses is what lets the estimator address loss to follow-up, the sampling design, differential completion, and confounding in one step.

What would settle it

Rerun the UPSIT analysis including all observed visits for participants who missed an eligible visit and later returned, fitting the same attendance, sampling, and completion models without the monotone restriction; if the weighted Long COVID versus non-Long COVID difference moves outside the reported 95% confidence interval of 1.3 to 11.3 percentage points, the monotone-missingness assumption is load-bearing. A simpler check is to compare the fully weighted estimate to a complete-case analysis restricted to participants who attended every eligible visit before first completion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for auxiliary-variable-dependent ('tiered') sampling, the adjusted exposure-specific mean of an outcome can be estimated consistently by weighting each observed outcome by the inverse of the joint probability of attending an eligible visit, being sampled and completing the test, and having the observed exposure level. In the repeated-sampling adult design, this weight is the inverse of the cumulative probability of first completing the test at visit k times the inverse of the exposure propensity score, where the propensity model is itself reweighted by the inverse probability of remaining on-study and eligible so that it reflects the full cohort rather than the tested subset. In the one-time pediatric design, the same logic multiplies the inverses of promotion, attendance, and completion probabilities by the inverse propensity weight. The visit-specific estimates are pooled by inverse-variance weighting, and variance is obtained from sandwich or bootstrap methods. Applied to the UPSIT smell test, the fully weighted estimate of the Long COVID versus non-Long COVID difference in severe microsmia or anosmia is 6.3 percentage points (95% CI 1.3 to 11.3), compared with 11.2 points unweighted.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes missingness is monotone — once a person misses an eligible visit or completes the test, they never contribute again — so any skipped-and-returned attendance is recoded as dropout; if real attendance is intermittent, that recoding can itself create selection bias the weights do not repair.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Unweighted analyses of tiered tests in RECOVER-style cohorts will overstate outcome prevalence and group differences whenever sampling favors participants with symptoms or triggers; the weighted estimates provide the bias-corrected version.
  • The same product-of-inverse-probabilities recipe applies to EHR-based studies where test ordering depends on time-varying symptoms or laboratory results, because the data structure is the same even without a formal sampling scheme.
  • Pooled mean differences from this procedure are time-averaged associations over the follow-up period, not effects at a single time point, so they should be interpreted as averages across visits.
  • The approach covers concurrently measured exposure and outcome; exposure-to-outcome lagged questions, associations between two tiered tests, and trajectories of repeated tiered testing are stated by the authors as needing further work.
  • Because the trigger for one tiered test can depend on another tiered test (e.g., brain MRI triggered by UPSIT), the paper identifies those settings as requiring additional methods to avoid further selection bias.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the monotone-missingness assumption fails, the reported 6.3-point difference is not guaranteed to be unbiased; a sensitivity analysis that restores intermittent attenders with visit-level indicators would show how much of the estimate depends on the recoding.
  • The same weighting structure could be transferred to other two-phase designs, such as immune-correlate analyses of vaccine trials, by plugging in design-known sampling probabilities for the promotion and attendance terms.
  • The gap between the unweighted 11.2-point and weighted 6.3-point difference is a direct quantification of how strongly trigger-driven oversampling inflated the crude smell-loss association, and a similar gap could serve as a diagnostic for other tiered tests.
  • A testable extension is to simulate full-cohort data from the fitted attendance, sampling, and completion models and compare the weighted estimator against the known truth, which would measure finite-sample bias and variance coverage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes inverse probability weighting estimators for outcome means and mean differences by exposure status in observational cohorts subject to auxiliary-variable-dependent ("tiered") sampling. Two designs are considered: repeated sampling over visits, as in RECOVER-Adult, and one-time sampling before exposure measurement and outcome collection, as in RECOVER-Pediatric. The estimators combine weights for visit attendance, sampling and test completion, and exposure propensity, with separate treatment of auxiliary variables used for sampling versus adjustment covariates. The adult estimator is illustrated with the UPSIT smell test, where the fully weighted analysis yields a Long COVID versus non-Long COVID difference of 6.3 percentage points (95% CI 1.3, 11.3) in severe microsmia or anosmia, compared with an unweighted difference of 11.2 points.

Significance. If the proposed estimators are valid, the paper addresses a practically important gap: tiered testing is common in large observational cohorts and EHR-based studies, yet accessible analytic guidance for such designs is limited. The paper's strengths include a clear formalization of the two sampling designs, an explicit distinction between auxiliary variables used for sampling and the adjustment covariate set, use of design-known sampling probabilities in the pediatric setting, and a concrete applied example with interpretable results. I found no circularity in the construction: the weights are estimated from auxiliary variables, exposure, and visit processes, not from the outcome. However, the central bias-correction claim is currently supported only by heuristic argument and one illustrative application; the paper provides no simulation, no formal consistency proof, and no sensitivity analysis for the structural monotone missingness assumption. These gaps are load-bearing for the method's general use.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eqs. (1)-(4)] The monotone missingness assumption (U_k=0 implies U_{k+1}=0, and at most one outcome per person) is load-bearing for the estimator, because the cumulative weights g^U_k and g^R_k are defined only for participants who remain continuously eligible without prior completion. Under intermittent attendance, a participant who misses visit 3 but returns at visit 4 has U_4 forced to 0, so their first eligible test at visit 4 is discarded even if it is their only eligible assessment; the inverse weights do not model the probability of return. The manuscript states that this structure was imposed "to facilitate analysis" and the Discussion defers "potential loss of data due to monotonization" to future work, but no simulation, sensitivity analysis, or empirical diagnostic is provided. The central bias-correction claim therefore currently holds only for a monotone-attendance subpopulation, not for the full RECOVER cohort if attendance is intermittent.
  2. [Section 2.2, Eq. (6) and the variance paragraph] The estimator is proposed without a consistency theorem, regularity conditions, or a simulation study. The text states that sandwich variance formulae for M-estimators or bootstrap can be used, but it does not verify that these remain valid when the weights and the propensity score are estimated, nor does it validate the inverse-variance pooling in Eq. (7) when the variance estimates are themselves estimated. A formal M-estimation argument or a simulation study is needed to support the inferential claims, including the reported 95% confidence interval in Section 3.
  3. [Section 2.2, paragraph on estimating the propensity score] The text says that the model for π^A_k(a;W) must be fit "inverse weighted by the probability defined by equation (3)," but the exact fitting procedure is not specified: it is not stated whether this is a weighted logistic regression, how the weights are normalized, or how uncertainty in g^U_k propagates into the final estimator. Without this detail, Eq. (6) is not fully reproducible, and the claim that this step is "necessary" is not demonstrated. Please provide an explicit estimating-equation or algorithmic definition.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3] The word "frequences" appears twice in the example text and should be "frequencies."
  2. [Section 2.3] The sentence "Using estimates of each probability defined in equations (6-9)" should refer to equations (8)-(11), since Eq. (6) is the adult estimator and the pediatric probabilities are defined in Eqs. (8)-(11).
  3. [Table 2] Table 2 is listed but its numerical contents are not included in the provided manuscript; the numbers quoted in the text are useful, but the table itself should be present in the final version.
  4. [Section 2.2, variance paragraph] The in-text citation "(Vaart, 1998)" does not match the reference list entry "A. W. van der Vaart"; please correct the citation style.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the inverse probability weights are estimated from auxiliary variables, exposure, and attendance/completion processes, not from the outcome; the UPSIT estimate is a standard weighted mean, and the monotone missingness assumption is an identifying restriction rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The adjusted mean estimator in Eq. (6) divides by estimated sampling/completion probabilities gR_k (Eq. 4) and exposure propensity πA_k (Eq. 5). These probabilities are defined and fitted from attendance/eligibility indicators U_k, sampling/completion indicators R_k, auxiliary variables Z_k, baseline covariates W, and exposure A_k; the outcome Y_k appears only in the final weighted mean, never as a covariate in the weight models. Similarly, the pediatric estimator in Eq. (12) uses πR, πU, πC, and πA, none of which are fitted on Y. The UPSIT example is an application of the estimator, not a prediction forced by a fit: the 6.3 percentage-point difference is the weighted contrast of observed UPSIT outcomes, and the paper explains the attenuation by oversampling of participants with smell/taste triggers without using the outcome to fit weights. Self-citations are to RECOVER study definitions (e.g., LCRI, cohort protocols) and to the prior two-phase sampling literature; they are not load-bearing for the weighting identities, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives. The monotone missingness structure in Section 2.2 ('we consider a monotone missingness structure, such that U_k = 0 implies U_{k+1} = 0') is an identifying restriction on the attendance process, not a reduction of the estimator to its inputs. The Discussion's statement that 'approaches to address potential loss of data due to monotonization' are expected in future work is an honest scope limitation, not a circular step, because the restriction targets the analysis sample rather than feeding the outcome back into the weights. No equation in the paper is equivalent by construction to its own inputs beyond the standard IPW identity that defines the estimator.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard IPW assumptions (positivity, ignorability, correct model specification) plus a structural monotone missingness assumption introduced for computational convenience in the repeated-sampling setting. The only fitted quantities are logistic model coefficients used to construct weights; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • Visit-specific attendance model coefficients (pi_U_k) = not reported
    Fit to RECOVER-Adult data to construct weights for each visit k in equations (1) and (3).
  • Sampling and completion model coefficients (pi_R_k) = not reported
    Fit via pooled logistic regression across visits to estimate equation (2) and the cumulative weight (4).
  • Propensity score model coefficients (pi_A) = not reported
    Fit on the on-study eligible cohort, inverse weighted by g_U, to estimate P(A_k=a|W) in equation (5).
  • Completion model coefficients (pi_C) in the pediatric setting = not reported
    Fit among attending Tier 2 participants in RECOVER-Pediatric to estimate equation (11).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Positivity of attendance, sampling, and completion probabilities
    IPW requires every participant in the target population to have positive probability of being sampled and completing the test; low sampling probabilities (e.g., 5.6% per visit) can make weights large and unstable. Invoked in Section 2.2 equations (1)-(4).
  • domain assumption Sequential ignorability of selection and completion given observed variables
    The weights condition on observed auxiliary variables Z, baseline W, and exposure A; if unmeasured factors drive offering or completion and are associated with the outcome, weighting does not remove bias. Stated in Section 2.2 as the conditioning sets of pi_U and pi_R.
  • domain assumption Correct specification of weight and propensity models
    The estimators are not doubly robust; misspecification of logistic models for pi_U, pi_R, pi_A, or pi_C biases the adjusted means. The Discussion lists doubly robust extensions as future work.
  • domain assumption Monotone missingness and at most one outcome per person
    Imposed in Section 2.2 to define the repeated-sampling weights; if intermittent attendance is monotonized into dropout, estimates may be biased. Acknowledged in the Discussion as 'potential loss of data due to monotonization'.
  • standard math Regularity conditions for M-estimator variance
    Variance is estimated via sandwich formulae or bootstrap; standard asymptotic conditions are not stated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inverse probability weighting for auxiliary variable dependent sampling in observational studies of Long COVID." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y5JWB3UD

@misc{pith2026260804918,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inverse probability weighting for auxiliary variable dependent sampling in observational studies of Long COVID},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y5JWB3UD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04918}
}
read the original abstract

Selective testing based on values of auxiliary variables is an increasingly popular design strategy in observational studies and is ubiquitous in electronic health record data. Ignoring this underlying sampling mechanism can lead to biased estimation and erroneous scientific conclusions. Yet, rigorous analytic methods for accounting for two-phase sampling designs in observational settings remain under-utilized. Motivated by the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Adult and Pediatric observational cohort studies, we describe common pitfalls and an approach for analysis of data collected via auxiliary variable dependent sampling.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1994 , publisher=

    An introduction to the bootstrap , author=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  2. [2]

    JAMA Network Open , author =

    Olfactory. JAMA Network Open , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.33815 , abstract =

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Vaart, A. W. van der , year =. Asymptotic. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511802256 , abstract =

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802256

  4. [4]

    Pediatrics , author =

    Postacute. Pediatrics , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1542/peds.2023-062570 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1542/peds.2023-062570 2024

  5. [5]

    Education's

    Lewis, Karyn and Kuhfeld, Megan , year =. Education's

  6. [6]

    World Journal of Pediatrics , author =

    Long. World Journal of Pediatrics , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s12519-021-00457-6 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s12519-021-00457-6 2021

  7. [7]

    The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health , author =

    Long. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00004-9 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00004-9 2022

  8. [8]

    Cureus , author =

    The. Cureus , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.7759/cureus.40655 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.7759/cureus.40655 2023

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    Children , author =

    Social,. Children , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.3390/children9111677 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    BMJ Open , author =

    Impact of. BMJ Open , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075756 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    European Journal of Pediatrics , author =

    Prevalence and clinical presentation of long. European Journal of Pediatrics , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00431-022-04600-x , abstract =

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Acta Paediatrica , author =

    Persistent symptoms in. Acta Paediatrica , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1111/apa.15999 , language =

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    American Journal of Epidemiology , author =

    A. American Journal of Epidemiology , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh090 , language =

    2004 doi

  6. [14]

    2011 , pages =

    Journal of Statistical Software , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i08 , language =

    2011 doi

  7. [15]

    R Core Team , month = jun, year =. R:

  8. [16]

    2024 , note =

    Launching. 2024 , note =. doi:10.17226/27835 , urldate =

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    Pediatrics , author =

    School. Pediatrics , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-1766 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    Biometrika , author =

    Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , volume =. Biometrika , author =. 1986 , pages =. doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 , abstract =

    1986 doi

  11. [19]

    Journal of Statistical Software , author =

    Analysis of. Journal of Statistical Software , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.18637/jss.v009.i08 , language =

    2004 doi

  12. [20]

    2021 , pmid =

    Protecting. 2021 , pmid =

    2021

  13. [21]

    PloS One , author =

    Researching. PloS One , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0285635 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    JAMA , author =

    Characterizing. JAMA , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.12747 , abstract =

    2024

  15. [23]

    2013 , pages =

    Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1037/a0032670 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    2014 , pages =

    World Psychiatry , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1002/wps.20154 , number =

    2014 doi

  17. [25]

    eClinicalMedicine , author =

    Risk factors for post-. eClinicalMedicine , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101961 , abstract =

    2023

  18. [26]

    Child Development , author =

    The. Child Development , author =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.2307/1132065 , language =

    1998 doi

  19. [27]

    Missouri Medicine , author =

    A century of influenza prevention in. Missouri Medicine , author =. 2012 , keywords =

    2012

  20. [28]

    Developmental Psychology , author =

    School readiness and later achievement , volume =. Developmental Psychology , author =. 2007 , keywords =. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428 , abstract =

    2007 doi

  21. [29]

    Development and Psychopathology , author =

    Biological processes in prevention and intervention:. Development and Psychopathology , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1017/S0954579408000436 , abstract =

    2008 doi

  22. [30]

    JAMA Network Open , author =

    Post–. JAMA Network Open , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23253 , abstract =

    2022

  23. [31]

    JAMA Pediatrics , author =

    Positive. JAMA Pediatrics , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3007 , language =

    2019

  24. [32]

    Health Affairs , author =

    Adverse. Health Affairs , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0914 , language =

    2014

  25. [33]

    Health Affairs , author =

    Family. Health Affairs , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05425 , language =

    2019

  26. [34]

    Pediatrics , author =

    Preventing. Pediatrics , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1542/peds.2021-052582 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    JAMA , author =

    Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention , volume =. JAMA , author =. 2009 , keywords =. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.754 , abstract =

    2009 doi

  28. [36]

    Social Innovations Journal , author =

    Help. Social Innovations Journal , author =

  29. [37]

    and Danziger, Sheldon and Cancian, Maria , year =

    Holzer, Harry J. and Danziger, Sheldon and Cancian, Maria , year =. Workforce. Changing

  30. [38]

    JAMA pediatrics , author =

    Clinical. JAMA pediatrics , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.2800 , abstract =

    2022

  31. [39]

    Archives of Disease in Childhood , author =

    Long. Archives of Disease in Childhood , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2021-323624 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    Long-. Scientific Reports , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-13495-5 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal , author =

    Long. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000003829 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    Long. Scientific Reports , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36995-4 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    The Lancet Microbe , author =

    Viral persistence in children infected with. The Lancet Microbe , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00115-5 , language =

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Future Microbiology , author =

    Clinical characteristics, activity levels and mental health problems in children with long coronavirus disease: a survey of 510 children , volume =. Future Microbiology , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.2217/fmb-2021-0285 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Acta Paediatrica , author =

    Paediatric long. Acta Paediatrica , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1111/apa.17129 , language =

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Maternal and Child Health Journal , author =

    Translating. Maternal and Child Health Journal , author =. 2014 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10995-013-1279-9 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  39. [47]

    Maternal and Child Health Journal , author =

    Lifecourse health development: past, present and future , volume =. Maternal and Child Health Journal , author =. 2014 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10995-013-1346-2 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    and Price, Jillian K

    Gerber, Naomi L. and Price, Jillian K. , year =. Measures of. Principles and. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-849905-4.00021-6 , language =

    doi

  41. [49]

    The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry , author =

    Illness and the role of the physician: a sociological perspective , volume =. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry , author =. 1951 , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1951.tb00003.x , language =

    1951

  42. [50]

    History of the Human Sciences , author =

    Why sociologists abandoned the sick role concept , volume =. History of the Human Sciences , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1177/0952695113507572 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly

    The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered , volume =. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society , author =. 1975 , keywords =

    1975

  44. [52]

    Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal , author =

    Orbito-. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000003578 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau , author =

    Rethinking. US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau , author =. 2010 , pages =

    2010

  46. [54]

    The New England journal of medicine , author =

    Developmental. The New England journal of medicine , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1056/NEJMe058187 , number =

    2005 doi

  47. [55]

    Frontiers in Pediatrics , author =

    Case report:. Frontiers in Pediatrics , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1165072 , abstract =

    2023

  48. [56]

    Nature Communications , author =

    True prevalence of long-. Nature Communications , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43661-w , abstract =

    2023 doi

  49. [57]

    Self-reported coronavirus (

    Office for National Statistics (ONS) , file =. Self-reported coronavirus (

  50. [58]

    and Thaweethai, Tanayott and Brosnahan, Shari B

    Horwitz, Leora I. and Thaweethai, Tanayott and Brosnahan, Shari B. and Cicek, Mine S. and Fitzgerald, Megan L. and Goldman, Jason D. and Hess, Rachel and Hodder, S. L. and Jacoby, Vanessa L. and Jordan, Michael R. and Krishnan, Jerry A. and Laiyemo, Adeyinka O. and Metz, Torri...

  51. [59]

    Journal of Medical Virology , author =

    Long-. Journal of Medical Virology , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/jmv.70429 , abstract =

    2025 doi

  52. [60]

    JAMA , author =

    Development of a. JAMA , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.8823 , abstract =

    2023

  53. [61]

    JAMA , author =

    2024. JAMA , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.24184 , abstract =

    2024

  54. [62]

    and Jones, Bradford S

    Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and Jones, Bradford S. , month = mar, year =. Event

  55. [63]

    Modeling

    Tutz, Gerhard and Schmid, Matthias , year =. Modeling. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28158-2 , urldate =

    doi

  56. [64]

    Journal of Statistical Software , author =

    mice:. Journal of Statistical Software , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  57. [65]

    The Laryngoscope , author =

    Smell and. The Laryngoscope , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1002/lary.30802 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    BMJ Medicine , author =

    Effect of covid-19 vaccination on long covid: systematic review , volume =. BMJ Medicine , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000385 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation , author =

    Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation , author =. 2009 , keywords =. doi:...

    2009 doi

  60. [68]

    and Monge, Susana , month = jun, year =

    Hernán, Miguel A. and Monge, Susana , month = jun, year =. Selection bias due to conditioning on a collider , volume =. BMJ , publisher =. doi:10.1136/bmj.p1135 , abstract =

    doi

  61. [69]

    and Andersson, Therese M.-L

    Syriopoulou, Elisavet and Wästerlid, Tove and Lambert, Paul C. and Andersson, Therese M.-L. , month = nov, year =. Standardised survival probabilities: a useful and informative tool for reporting regression models for survival data , volume =. British Journal of Cancer , publi...

    doi

  62. [70]

    Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes , author =

    Landmark. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957951 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  63. [71]

    Journal of Statistical Software , author =

    Various. Journal of Statistical Software , author =. 2020 , file =. doi:10.18637/jss.v095.i01 , language =

    2020 doi

  64. [72]

    National Academies of Sciences,. A. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.17226/27768 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  65. [73]

    and Santacroce, Leah and Bassett, Ingrid V

    Feldman, Candace H. and Santacroce, Leah and Bassett, Ingrid V. and Thaweethai, Tanayott and Alicic, Radica and Atchley-Challenner, Rachel and Chung, Alicia and Goldberg, Mark P. and Horowitz, Carol R. and Jacobson, Karen B. and Kelly, J. Daniel and Knight, Stacey and Lutrick,...

  66. [74]

    JAMA Network Open , author =

    Sex. JAMA Network Open , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55430 , abstract =

    2025

  67. [75]

    Guide to

    Bickel, Gary and Nord, Mark and Price, Cristofer and Hamilton, William and Cook, John , year =. Guide to

  68. [76]

    Obstetrics & Gynecology , author =

    Long. Obstetrics & Gynecology , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000006067 , abstract =

    2026 doi

  69. [77]

    The Journal of Pediatrics , author =

    Intrauterine. The Journal of Pediatrics , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2026.114997 , language =

    2026

  70. [78]

    Obstetrics & Gynecology , author =

    Post–. Obstetrics & Gynecology , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005670 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  71. [79]

    Pediatric Research , author =

    International. Pediatric Research , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41390-023-03015-0 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    Emerging Infectious Diseases , author =

    Functional. Emerging Infectious Diseases , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.3201/eid3114.251035 , language =

    2025

  73. [81]

    The Clinical Neuropsychologist , author =

    Neuropsychological functioning of pediatric patients with long. The Clinical Neuropsychologist , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1080/13854046.2024.2344455 , abstract =

    2024

  74. [82]

    Vaccine , author =

    Preventive effect of vaccination on long. Vaccine , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127907 , language =

    2025

  75. [83]

    JAMA Pediatrics , author =

    Social. JAMA Pediatrics , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.5485 , abstract =

    2026

  76. [84]

    PM&R , author =

    Multi‐disciplinary collaborative consensus guidance statement on the assessment and treatment of postacute sequelae of. PM&R , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12890 , language =

    2022 doi

  77. [85]

    BMC Medical Research Methodology , author =

    Penalized regression with negative-unlabeled data: an approach to developing a. BMC Medical Research Methodology , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1186/s12874-025-02737-5 , language =

    2025 doi

  78. [86]

    Nature Reviews

    Long. Nature Reviews. Microbiology , author =. 2023 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00846-2 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  79. [87]

    Biometrika , author =

    A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials , volume =. Biometrika , author =. 1986 , pages =. doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.1 , abstract =

    1986 doi

  80. [88]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , author =

    Statistics in epidemiology: the case-control study , volume =. Journal of the American Statistical Association , author =. 1996 , keywords =. doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476660 , abstract =

    1996

  81. [89]

    American Journal of Epidemiology , author =

    Using the whole cohort in the analysis of case-cohort data , volume =. American Journal of Epidemiology , author =. 2009 , keywords =. doi:10.1093/aje/kwp055 , abstract =

    2009 doi

  82. [90]

    The annals of applied statistics , author =

    Patient recruitment using electronic health records under selection bias: a two-phase sampling framework , volume =. The annals of applied statistics , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1214/23-aoas1860 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society

    Two-. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1111/rssa.12689 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  84. [92]

    Statistics in Medicine , author =

    Double. Statistics in Medicine , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/sim.10298 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  85. [93]

    Biometrics , author =

    Augmented designs to assess immune response in vaccine trials , volume =. Biometrics , author =. 2006 , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00569.x , abstract =

    2006

  86. [94]

    Statistics in Medicine , author =

    Calibration weighted estimation of semiparametric transformation models for two-phase sampling , volume =. Statistics in Medicine , author =. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/sim.6439 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  87. [95]

    Lifetime Data Analysis , author =

    Joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data with the. Lifetime Data Analysis , author =. 2017 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10985-016-9364-1 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  88. [96]

    Vaccine , author =

    Four statistical frameworks for assessing an immune correlate of protection (surrogate endpoint) from a randomized, controlled, vaccine efficacy trial , volume =. Vaccine , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.071 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  89. [97]

    and Rotnitzky, Andrea and Zhao, Lue Ping , month = sep, year =

    Robins, James M. and Rotnitzky, Andrea and Zhao, Lue Ping , month = sep, year =. Estimation of. Journal of the American Statistical Association , publisher =. doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476818 , abstract =

    1994

  90. [98]

    , year =

    Rotnitzky, Andrea and Robins, James M. , year =. Semiparametric. Biometrika , publisher =. doi:10.2307/2337346 , abstract =

    doi

  91. [99]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , author =

    Maximum. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , author =. 1997 , note =. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00078 , abstract =

    1997

  92. [100]

    The Annals of Statistics , author =

    Large sample theory for semiparametric regression models with two-phase, outcome dependent sampling , volume =. The Annals of Statistics , author =. 2003 , file =. doi:10.1214/aos/1059655907 , language =

    2003

  93. [101]

    , year =

    Wang, Weiwei and Scharfstein, Daniel and Tan, Zhiqiang and MacKenzie, Ellen J. , year =. Causal. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology) , publisher =

  94. [102]

    The International Journal of Biostatistics , author =

    A targeted maximum likelihood estimator for two-stage designs , volume =. The International Journal of Biostatistics , author =. 2011 , keywords =. doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1217 , abstract =

    2011

  95. [103]

    The International Journal of Biostatistics , author =

    Efficient. The International Journal of Biostatistics , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1515/ijb-2019-0087 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  96. [104]

    Biometrics , author =

    Efficient nonparametric inference on the effects of stochastic interventions under two-phase sampling, with applications to vaccine efficacy trials , volume =. Biometrics , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1111/biom.13375 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  97. [105]

    Statistics in Medicine , author =

    Optimal auxiliary-covariate-based two-phase sampling design for semiparametric efficient estimation of a mean or mean difference, with application to clinical trials , volume =. Statistics in Medicine , author =. 2014 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/sim.6006 , abstract =

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.