Pith. sign in

REVIEW 64 references

N-body Simulations of Large-Scale Structure in the Generalized Cubic Covariant Galileon Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.06499 v1 pith:Y7VPZAFR submitted 2026-08-06 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords nonlineargccgcubicmattersimulationscovariantgalileonmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present the first N-body simulations of structure formation in the Generalized Cubic Covariant Galileon (GCCG) model. This theory extends the cubic covariant Galileon through power-law kinetic and cubic derivative interactions and admits tracker solutions leading to late-time cosmic acceleration. Previous studies of GCCG have mostly focused on the background, linear perturbations, or semi-analytic nonlinear prescriptions. Here we implement the nonlinear scalar-field equation in the ECOSMOG adaptive-mesh refinement code, allowing us to follow the coupled evolution of matter clustering and Vainshtein screening in the fully nonlinear regime. We quantify the impact of GCCG on the nonlinear matter power spectrum and compare the simulation results with predictions from the halo-model reaction approach. For the parameter choices considered, the GCCG model enhances the matter power spectrum relative to the corresponding QCDM cosmology, with the effect increasing towards low redshift and reaching approximately $7\%$ at $z=0$ in the transition to the nonlinear regime. At smaller scales, the enhancement decreases as a consequence of Vainshtein screening. We find that the reaction framework captures the qualitative behaviour of the simulations, while residual differences appear on deeply nonlinear scales. We also analyse the abundance of dark matter haloes, finding an enhancement relative to QCDM that becomes more pronounced towards lower redshift and in the high-mass tail. These simulations provide the first nonlinear calibration of structure formation in GCCG and establish the range of validity of efficient semi-analytical predictions for applications to forthcoming large-scale-structure surveys.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riesset al.(Supernova Search Team), Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

  2. [2]

    Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), As- trophys

    S. Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), As- trophys. J.517, 565 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9812133

  3. [3]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

  4. [4]

    D. J. Eisensteinet al.(SDSS), Astrophys. J.633, 560 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0501171

  5. [5]

    Alamet al.(BOSS), Mon

    S. Alamet al.(BOSS), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.470, 2617 (2017), arXiv:1607.03155 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    Di Valentinoet al., Astropart

    E. Di Valentinoet al., Astropart. Phys.131, 102605 (2021), arXiv:2008.11284 [astro-ph.CO]

  7. [7]

    Weinberg, Rev

    S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys.61, 1 (1989)

  8. [8]

    S. M. Carroll, Living Rev. Rel.4, 1 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0004075

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Akramiet al.(CANTATA),Modified Gravity and Cos- mology

    Y. Akramiet al.(CANTATA),Modified Gravity and Cos- mology. An Update by the CANTATA Network, edited by E. N. Saridakis, R. Lazkoz, V. Salzano, P. Vargas Moniz, S. Capozziello, J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, M. De Laurentis, and G. J. Olmo (Springer, 2021) arXiv:2105.12582 [gr-qc]

  2. [10]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), JCAP04, 012 (2025), arXiv:2404.03000 [astro-ph.CO]

  3. [11]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), JCAP01, 124 (2025), arXiv:2404.03001 [astro-ph.CO]

  4. [12]

    Guet al.(DESI), (2025), arXiv:2504.06118 [astro- ph.CO]

    G. Guet al.(DESI), (2025), arXiv:2504.06118 [astro- ph.CO]

  5. [13]

    Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [14]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.(DES), (2026), arXiv:2605.27221 [astro-ph.CO]

  7. [15]

    G. Ye, M. Martinelli, B. Hu, and A. Silvestri, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 181002 (2025), arXiv:2407.15832 [astro- ph.CO]

  8. [16]

    W. J. Wolf, C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, T. Anton, and P. G. Fer- reira, (2025), arXiv:2504.07679 [astro-ph.CO]

  9. [17]

    W. J. Wolf, P. G. Ferreira, and C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, Phys. Rev. D111, L041303 (2025), arXiv:2409.17019 [astro- ph.CO]

  10. [18]

    G. W. Horndeski, Int. J. Theor. Phys.10, 363 (1974)

  11. [19]

    Deffayet, X

    C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D. A. Steer, and G. Zahariade, Phys. Rev. D84, 064039 (2011), arXiv:1103.3260 [hep- th]

  12. [20]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama, Prog. Theor. Phys.126, 511 (2011), arXiv:1105.5723 [hep-th]

  13. [21]

    Ostrogradsky, Mem

    M. Ostrogradsky, Mem. Acad. St. Petersbourg6, 385 (1850)

  14. [22]

    R. P. Woodard, Scholarpedia10, 32243 (2015), arXiv:1506.02210 [hep-th]

  15. [23]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  16. [24]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, JCAP1202, 007 (2012), arXiv:1110.3878 [gr-qc]

  17. [25]

    Frusciante, S

    N. Frusciante, S. Peirone, L. Atayde, and A. De Fe- lice, Phys. Rev. D101, 064001 (2020), arXiv:1912.07586 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [26]

    Giacomello, A

    F. Giacomello, A. De Felice, and S. Ansoldi, JCAP03, 038 (2019), arXiv:1811.10885 [astro-ph.CO]

  19. [27]

    J. A. Kable, G. Benevento, N. Frusciante, A. De Fe- lice, and S. Tsujikawa, JCAP09, 002 (2022), arXiv:2111.10432 [astro-ph.CO]

  20. [28]

    A. I. Vainshtein, Phys. Lett. B39, 393 (1972)

  21. [29]

    Joyce, B

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rept.568, 1 (2015), arXiv:1407.0059 [astro-ph.CO]

  22. [30]

    against fullN-body simulations [34] in the limit in which the GCCG model resembles the original Cubic Covariant Galileon model [35], achieving∼5% accuracy across a wide range of scales and redshifts, and used to forecast percent-level constraints on the extra GCCG pa- rameters...

  23. [31]

    Atayde, N

    L. Atayde, N. Frusciante, B. Bose, S. Casas, and B. Li, Phys. Rev. D110, 024082 (2024), arXiv:2404.11471 [astro-ph.CO]

  24. [32]

    Cataneo, L

    M. Cataneo, L. Lombriser, C. Heymans, A. Mead, A. Barreira, S. Bose, and B. Li, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488, 2121 (2019), arXiv:1812.05594 [astro-ph.CO]

  25. [33]

    B. Bose, M. Cataneo, T. Tr¨ oster, Q. Xia, C. Heymans, and L. Lombriser, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, 4650 (2020), arXiv:2005.12184 [astro-ph.CO]

  26. [34]

    B. Bose, B. S. Wright, M. Cataneo, A. Pourtsidou, C. Giocoli, L. Lombriser, I. G. McCarthy, M. Baldi, S. Pfeifer, and Q. Xia., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 508, 2479 (2021), arXiv:2105.12114 [astro-ph.CO]

  27. [35]

    Barreira, B

    A. Barreira, B. Li, W. A. Hellwing, C. M. Baugh, and S. Pascoli, JCAP10, 027 (2013), arXiv:1306.3219 [astro- ph.CO]

  28. [36]

    Deffayet, G

    C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese, and A. Vikman, Phys. Rev.D79, 084003 (2009), arXiv:0901.1314 [hep-th]

  29. [37]

    Boseet al., Mon

    B. Boseet al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.536, 664 (2024), arXiv:2406.13667 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [38]

    Li, G.-B

    B. Li, G.-B. Zhao, R. Teyssier, and K. Koyama, JCAP 01, 051 (2012), arXiv:1110.1379 [astro-ph.CO]

  31. [39]

    Puchwein, M

    E. Puchwein, M. Baldi, and V. Springel, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.436, 348 (2013), arXiv:1305.2418 [astro- 12 ph.CO]

  32. [40]

    Llinares, D

    C. Llinares, D. F. Mota, and H. A. Winther, Astron. Astrophys.562, A78 (2014), arXiv:1307.6748 [astro- ph.CO]

  33. [41]

    Schmidt, Phys

    F. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D80, 123003 (2009), arXiv:0910.0235 [astro-ph.CO]

  34. [42]

    Schmidt, Phys

    F. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D80, 043001 (2009), arXiv:0905.0858 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [43]

    Li, G.-B

    B. Li, G.-B. Zhao, and K. Koyama, JCAP05, 023 (2013), arXiv:1303.0008 [astro-ph.CO]

  36. [44]

    Hassani and L

    F. Hassani and L. Lombriser, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.497, 1885 (2020), arXiv:2003.05927 [astro-ph.CO]

  37. [45]

    Nouri-Zonoz, F

    A. Nouri-Zonoz, F. Hassani, E. Bellini, and M. Kunz, (2025), arXiv:2511.04676 [astro-ph.CO]

  38. [46]

    Ganjooet al., (2026), arXiv:2604.15434 [astro- ph.CO]

    H. Ganjooet al., (2026), arXiv:2604.15434 [astro- ph.CO]

  39. [47]

    N. O. Woodcock, S. Bose, Y. Gao, and B. Li, (2026), arXiv:2607.24940 [astro-ph.CO]

  40. [48]

    Deffayet, O

    C. Deffayet, O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki, and A. Vikman, JCAP1010, 026 (2010), arXiv:1008.0048 [hep-th]

  41. [49]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 231302 (2010), arXiv:1008.0603 [hep-th]

  42. [50]

    Barreira, B

    A. Barreira, B. Li, C. M. Baugh, and S. Pascoli, JCAP 1311, 056 (2013), arXiv:1308.3699 [astro-ph.CO]

  43. [51]

    Barreira, B

    A. Barreira, B. Li, C. M. Baugh, and S. Pascoli, jcap8, 059 (2014), arXiv:1406.0485

  44. [52]

    J. Renk, M. Zumalacarregui, F. Montanari, and A. Bar- reira, JCAP1710, 020 (2017), arXiv:1707.02263 [astro- ph.CO]

  45. [53]

    I. S. Albuquerque, N. Frusciante, F. Pace, and C. Schimd, Phys. Rev. D109, 023535 (2024), arXiv:2401.04096 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [54]

    Bellini and I

    E. Bellini and I. Sawicki, arXiv:1404.3713 [astro-ph, physics:gr-qc] (2014), arXiv: 1404.3713

  47. [55]

    Teyssier, Astron

    R. Teyssier, Astron. Astrophys.385, 337 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0111367

  48. [56]

    Davis, B

    A.-C. Davis, B. Li, D. F. Mota, and H. A. Winther, Astrophys. J.748, 61 (2012), arXiv:1108.3081 [astro- ph.CO]

  49. [57]

    Brax, A.-C

    P. Brax, A.-C. Davis, B. Li, H. A. Winther, and G.- B. Zhao, JCAP04, 029 (2013), arXiv:1303.0007 [astro- ph.CO]

  50. [58]

    P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A.-C. Davis, B. Li, and D. J. Shaw, Phys. Rev. D83, 104026 (2011), arXiv:1102.3692 [astro-ph.CO]

  51. [59]

    Becker, C

    C. Becker, C. Arnold, B. Li, and L. Heisenberg, JCAP 10, 055 (2020), arXiv:2007.03042 [astro-ph.CO]

  52. [60]

    Crocce, S

    M. Crocce, S. Pueblas, and R. Scoccimarro, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.373, 369 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0606505

  53. [61]

    Springel, Mon

    V. Springel, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.364, 1105 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505010

  54. [62]

    POWMES: Measuring the Power Spectrum in an N-body Simulation,

    S. Colombi and D. Novikov, “POWMES: Measuring the Power Spectrum in an N-body Simulation,” Astro- physics Source Code Library, record ascl:1110.017 (2011), ascl:1110.017

  55. [63]

    P. S. Behroozi, R. H. Wechsler, and H.-Y. Wu, Astro- phys. J.762, 109 (2013), arXiv:1110.4372 [astro-ph.CO]

  56. [64]

    pynbody: N-Body/SPH analysis for python,

    A. Pontzen, R. Roˇ skar, G. Stinson, and R. Woods, “pynbody: N-Body/SPH analysis for python,” Astro- physics Source Code Library, record ascl:1305.002 (2013), ascl:1305.002

Pith tools