Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 44 references

RATIO: Redundancy-Controlled Stochastic Routing for Reliable Vehicular Multi-Hop Networking

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read RATIO routing assigns per-link forwarding probabilities on a reduced DAG to control redundancy continuously instead of by integer duplication.

desk verdict RATIO's modulo stochastic rule on reduced DAGs gives continuous redundancy control, but the heuristic's distance to the idealized optimum stays unquantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.17481 v1 pith:YAGQTGIW submitted 2026-06-16 cs.NI cs.ET

classification cs.NIcs.ET
keywords vehicularnetworksstochasticroutingredundancycontrolmulti-hopdeliverypacketratiodirectedacyclicgraphforwardingprobabilitiesns-3simulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops RATIO to improve reliable low-latency multi-hop delivery in vehicular networks where mobility and blockage cause frequent route breaks. It builds a weighted reduced directed acyclic graph for each flow, sets edge weights as forwarding probabilities that may sum above one at forks, and applies a modulo-based stochastic rule to realize non-integer redundancy levels. An idealized version minimizes total load subject to per-flow timely reliability and capacity limits, but because the problem is hard under time-varying conditions a local heuristic called H-RATIO is introduced that builds the DAG from candidate paths and tunes probabilities through iterative scoring and replication adjustment. Trace-driven co-simulations with SUMO and ns-3 show the method yields the highest timely packet delivery ratio while using fewer transmissions than deterministic baselines, especially when load is high.

What carries the argument

Weighted reduced DAG whose edges carry forwarding probabilities together with the modulo-based stochastic forwarding rule at fork nodes

What would settle it

A SUMO/ns-3 trace in which channel coherence time is shortened to a few hundred milliseconds and H-RATIO timely PDR falls below that of a deterministic multi-path baseline would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For each active flow RATIO constructs a weighted reduced directed acyclic graph whose edge weights are per-link forwarding probabilities. At fork nodes the aggregate outgoing probability is permitted to exceed one and a modulo-based stochastic forwarding rule guarantees that each packet is sent exactly once while realizing the intended redundancy. The design is first posed as a load-minimizing optimization subject to timely-reliability and link-capacity constraints; because the full problem is intractable under dynamic wireless conditions, the practical H-RATIO heuristic solves it approximately by successive local scoring and replication-adjustment iterations on a compact DAG formed from the

Load-bearing premise

The local scoring and replication-adjustment iterations in H-RATIO keep the chosen forwarding probabilities close to the global load-minimizing optimum even when wireless channels and vehicle positions change over time.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Timely packet delivery ratio exceeds that of conventional deterministic replication schemes.
  • Transmission overhead drops especially under high offered load because redundancy is not forced to integer multiples of whole paths.
  • Forwarding decisions remain feasible at every node while the total load stays within link capacities.
  • Redundancy level can be varied continuously rather than in discrete steps, allowing adaptation to instantaneous network state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same probability-based control could be tested in other mobile ad-hoc settings such as drone swarms where topology changes are also rapid.
  • Adding explicit prediction of link quality into the local scoring step might reduce the gap between the heuristic and the idealized optimum.
  • Running the method on hardware testbeds with real 802.11p radios would show how closely the simulated efficiency gains survive hardware timing and interference effects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes RATIO, a stochastic multi-hop routing scheme for vehicular networks that builds a weighted reduced DAG with per-link forwarding probabilities and employs a modulo-based stochastic rule at forks to enable continuously tunable redundancy (aggregate probability >1). An idealized formulation minimizes load subject to timely-reliability and capacity constraints, but is intractable under dynamics; the practical H-RATIO heuristic uses local scoring and replication-adjustment iterations on the union of candidate paths. Trace-driven SUMO/ns-3 co-simulations are reported to show RATIO/H-RATIO attaining the highest timely PDR and superior delivery efficiency versus baselines, especially under high load.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would demonstrate a practical method for continuously controllable redundancy that improves the reliability-efficiency trade-off in highly dynamic vehicular settings relative to deterministic replication. The stochastic forwarding rule and reduced-DAG construction are technically interesting contributions to the routing literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [H-RATIO heuristic description] The transition from the idealized load-minimizing optimization to the H-RATIO heuristic (the section describing local scoring and replication-adjustment iterations) asserts that the heuristic produces forwarding probabilities close to the optimum under time-varying conditions, yet provides neither approximation bounds nor direct empirical comparisons (e.g., on frozen network snapshots) between heuristic outputs and solutions of the idealized problem. This assumption is load-bearing for interpreting the simulation gains as evidence for the stochastic redundancy-control mechanism itself.
  2. [Evaluation / simulation results] The evaluation section reports that RATIO/H-RATIO consistently achieves the highest timely PDR and substantially better delivery efficiency, but supplies no information on baseline definitions, whether heuristic parameters were tuned on the same traces used for evaluation, statistical significance tests, or error bars across runs. These omissions directly affect the strength of the empirical support for the central performance claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [RATIO design] The definition and motivation of the modulo-based stochastic forwarding rule would benefit from an explicit small example showing how aggregate probability >1 is realized without violating per-link feasibility.
  2. [Notation and formulation] Notation for the per-link forwarding probabilities and the reduced DAG construction could be made more uniform between the idealized formulation and the H-RATIO description.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and committing to revisions that strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [H-RATIO heuristic description] The transition from the idealized load-minimizing optimization to the H-RATIO heuristic (the section describing local scoring and replication-adjustment iterations) asserts that the heuristic produces forwarding probabilities close to the optimum under time-varying conditions, yet provides neither approximation bounds nor direct empirical comparisons (e.g., on frozen network snapshots) between heuristic outputs and solutions of the idealized problem. This assumption is load-bearing for interpreting the simulation gains as evidence for the stochastic redundancy-control mechanism itself.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript lacks both approximation bounds and direct empirical comparisons between H-RATIO and the idealized formulation. Deriving theoretical bounds remains challenging given the dynamic setting, but we will add empirical comparisons on frozen network snapshots in the revision. This will involve extracting static instances from the traces, solving the idealized optimization on those snapshots, and reporting the resulting probability and load differences relative to H-RATIO outputs. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Evaluation / simulation results] The evaluation section reports that RATIO/H-RATIO consistently achieves the highest timely PDR and substantially better delivery efficiency, but supplies no information on baseline definitions, whether heuristic parameters were tuned on the same traces used for evaluation, statistical significance tests, or error bars across runs. These omissions directly affect the strength of the empirical support for the central performance claim.

    Authors: We will revise the evaluation section to supply the missing details: explicit definitions and citations for all baselines, confirmation that H-RATIO parameters were tuned on a disjoint validation trace set, results of statistical significance tests (e.g., paired t-tests) against baselines, and error bars showing standard deviation over ten independent runs with varied random seeds. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: idealized optimization acknowledged intractable; heuristic validated on external traces

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from an explicit idealized load-minimizing optimization (intractable under time-varying dynamics) to a local-iteration heuristic H-RATIO whose outputs are then evaluated on independent SUMO/ns-3 trace-driven simulations. No equation equates a claimed performance quantity to a fitted parameter from the same data, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the simulation results are not statistically forced by construction. The central claim therefore remains externally falsifiable and does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about wireless link modeling and mobility traces plus the new protocol elements; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • per-link forwarding probabilities
    Determined by local scoring and replication-adjustment iterations in H-RATIO; values are outputs of the heuristic rather than fixed constants.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption A reduced directed acyclic graph can be constructed as the union of candidate paths that captures relevant routing options under vehicular mobility.
    Invoked when building the routing structure for both idealized and heuristic versions.
invented entities (1)
  • modulo-based stochastic forwarding rule
    purpose: To guarantee feasible forwarding when aggregate outgoing probability exceeds one while enabling continuous redundancy control.
    New mechanism introduced by the paper; no independent evidence outside the proposed protocol.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of RATIO: Redundancy-Controlled Stochastic Routing for Reliable Vehicular Multi-Hop Networking." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YAGQTGIW

@misc{pith2026260617481,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: RATIO: Redundancy-Controlled Stochastic Routing for Reliable Vehicular Multi-Hop Networking},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YAGQTGIW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.17481}
}
read the original abstract

Reliable, low-latency multi-hop data delivery in vehicular networks is increasingly demanded, yet remains challenging due to frequent route failures caused by high mobility and intermittent blockage. While redundancy-based routing enhances robustness by forwarding packets over multiple paths, over-replication intensifies contention and introduces additional delay, highlighting the need to carefully managing redundancy--reliability trade-off. However, conventional deterministic multi-path replication typically duplicates packets to an integer number of branches, making the redundancy level hard to tune and adapt to time-varying network dynamics in vehicular networks. To this end, Redundancy-Controlled Stochastic (RATIO) routing is proposed in this paper. For each active flow, RATIO constructs a weighted reduced directed acyclic graph (DAG) as the routing structure, where edge weights specify per-link forwarding probabilities. At fork nodes, the aggregate outgoing forwarding probability is allowed to exceed one and a modulo-based stochastic forwarding rule is employed to guarantee feasible forwarding, thereby enabling continuously controllable redundancy. An idealized RATIO design is formulated as a load-minimizing optimization subject to per-flow timely-reliability and link-capacity constraints, but the problem is generally intractable under time-varying wireless dynamics. Accordingly, a practical heuristic, termed H-RATIO, is developed. H-RATIO constructs a compact reduced DAG by taking the union of candidate paths and optimizes forwarding probabilities via local scoring and replication-adjustment iterations. Extensive trace-driven SUMO/ns-3 co-simulations demonstrate that RATIO/H-RATIO consistently achieves the highest timely PDR compared to baselines, while providing substantially better delivery efficiency, especially under high-load scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17481 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the modulo-based packet forwarding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A 3 × 3 road grid with five RSUs. After termination, the resulting { ,() } are installed for period and executed by each node using the modulo-based packet forwarding rule described in Section IV-A. D. Complexity and Scalability Analysis Let ¬ |V|, ¬ |E() |, ¬ |F () |, and let ¯ denote the edge count of reduced DAG D () [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Per-decision runtime versus the number of vehicles fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Parameter sensitivity of H-RATIO under 144 vehicles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Average replication level selected by H-RATIO under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Performance comparison under two traffic conditions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references

  1. [1]

    A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks,

    H. Hartenstein and K. P . Laberteaux, “A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 164–171, 2008

  2. [2]

    A comprehensive survey on vehicular ad hoc network,

    S. Al-Sultan, M. M. Al-Doori, H. M. Al-Bayatti, and H. Zedan, “A comprehensive survey on vehicular ad hoc network,” Journal of Network and Computer Applica- tions, vol. 37, pp. 380–392, 2014

  3. [3]

    A comprehensive survey on vehicular ad hoc networks (V ANETs),

    M. A. Al-shareeda, M. A. Alazzawi, M. Anbar, S. Man- ickam, and A. K. Al-Ani, “A comprehensive survey on vehicular ad hoc networks (V ANETs),” in Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Computer Ap- plications (ACA) , 2021, pp. 156–160

  4. [4]

    Mesh architec- ture for efficient integrated access and backhaul network- ing,

    B. Zhai, M. Y u, A. Tang, and X. Wang, “Mesh architec- ture for efficient integrated access and backhaul network- ing,” in Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) , 2020, pp. 1–6

  5. [5]

    Scheduling and power control for con- nectivity enhancement in multi-hop I2V/V2V networks,

    B. L. Nguyen, D. T. Ngo, M. N. Dao, V . N. Q. Bao, and H. L. Vu, “Scheduling and power control for con- nectivity enhancement in multi-hop I2V/V2V networks,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 10 322–10 332, 2022

  6. [6]

    Latency and reliability of mmWave multi-hop V2V communications under relay selections,

    Z. Li, L. Xiang, X. Ge, G. Mao, and H.-C. Chao, “Latency and reliability of mmWave multi-hop V2V communications under relay selections,” IEEE Transac- tions on V ehicle T echnology, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 9807– 9821, 2020

  7. [7]

    Routing in vehicular ad hoc net- works: A survey,

    F. Li and Y . Wang, “Routing in vehicular ad hoc net- works: A survey,” IEEE V ehicular T echnology Magazine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 12–22, 2007

  8. [8]

    Route stability based QoS routing in mobile ad hoc networks,

    N. Sarma and S. Nandi, “Route stability based QoS routing in mobile ad hoc networks,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 203–224, Mar. 2009

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    A survey of routing protocols based on link-stability in mobile ad hoc net- works,

    A. Moussaoui and A. Boukeream, “A survey of routing protocols based on link-stability in mobile ad hoc net- works,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications , vol. 47, pp. 1–10, 2015

  2. [10]

    On-demand multipath distance vector routing in ad hoc networks,

    M. K. Marina and S. R. Das, “On-demand multipath distance vector routing in ad hoc networks,” in Proceed- ings of International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), Nov. 2001, pp. 14–23

  3. [11]

    ExOR: opportunistic multi- hop routing for wireless networks,

    S. Biswas and R. Morris, “ExOR: opportunistic multi- hop routing for wireless networks,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Applications, T echnologies, Archi- tectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM), 2005, pp. 133–144

  4. [12]

    QoS issues in ad hoc wireless networks,

    S. Chakrabarti and A. Mishra, “QoS issues in ad hoc wireless networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 142–148, 2001

  5. [13]

    A survey of QoS routing solutions for mobile ad hoc networks,

    L. Hanzo and R. Tafazolli, “A survey of QoS routing solutions for mobile ad hoc networks,” IEEE Commu- nications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 50–70, 2007

  6. [14]

    Routing protocols in ad hoc networks: A survey,

    A. Boukerche, B. Turgut, N. A ydin, M. Z. Ahmad, L. B¨ ol¨ oni, and D. Turgut, “Routing protocols in ad hoc networks: A survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 55, no. 13, pp. 3032–3080, 2011

  7. [15]

    On-demand QoS routing in multihop mobile networks,

    C. Lin, “On-demand QoS routing in multihop mobile networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Confer- ence on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) , 2001, pp. 1735–1744

  8. [16]

    QoS-aware routing based on bandwidth estimation for mobile ad hoc networks,

    L. Chen and W . Heinzelman, “QoS-aware routing based on bandwidth estimation for mobile ad hoc networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 561–572, 2005

  9. [17]

    Mobility and QoS aware anycast routing in mobile ad hoc networks,

    P . Basarkod and S. Manvi, “Mobility and QoS aware anycast routing in mobile ad hoc networks,” Computers & Electrical Engineering , vol. 48, pp. 86–99, 2015

  10. [18]

    On SDN-driven network optimization and QoS aware routing using multiple paths,

    M. Bagaa, D. L. C. Dutra, T. Taleb, and K. Samdanis, “On SDN-driven network optimization and QoS aware routing using multiple paths,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 4700–4714, 2020

  11. [19]

    QoS multicast routing utilizing cross-layer design for IoT-enabled MANET in RIS- aided cell-free massive MIMO,

    T.-N. Tran and B. An, “QoS multicast routing utilizing cross-layer design for IoT-enabled MANET in RIS- aided cell-free massive MIMO,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 11 876–11 893, 2024

  12. [20]

    QoS-aware routing protocol for cognitive radio ad hoc networks,

    R. N. Raj, A. Nayak, and M. Sathish Kumar, “QoS-aware routing protocol for cognitive radio ad hoc networks,” Ad Hoc Networks , vol. 113, p. 102386, 2021

  13. [21]

    A QoS-adaptive routing scheme for Urban- MANETs,

    Q. V . Khanh, V . A. Dang, Q. N. Minh, and D. C. Nguyen, “A QoS-adaptive routing scheme for Urban- MANETs,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 26 001–26 008, 2025

  14. [22]

    Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing,

    C. E. Perkins, E. M. Belding-Royer, and S. R. Das, “Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing,” IETF, Tech. Rep. RFC 3561, 2003

  15. [23]

    The dy- 19 namic source routing protocol (DSR) for mobile ad hoc networks for IPv4,

    D. B. Johnson, D. A. Maltz, and Y .-C. Hu, “The dy- 19 namic source routing protocol (DSR) for mobile ad hoc networks for IPv4,” RFC 4728, Feb. 2007

  16. [24]

    Optimized link state routin g protocol (OLSR),

    T. Clausen and P . Jacquet, “Optimized link state routin g protocol (OLSR),” IETF, Tech. Rep. RFC 3626, 2003

  17. [25]

    Intersection-based geographical routing protocol for V ANETs: A proposal and analysis,

    H. Saleet, R. Langar, K. Naik, R. Boutaba, A. Nayak, and N. Goel, “Intersection-based geographical routing protocol for V ANETs: A proposal and analysis,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular T echnology, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 4560–4574, 2011

  18. [26]

    GROOV: A geographic routing over V ANETs and its performance evaluation,

    S. K. Dhurandher, M. S. Obaidat, D. Bhardwaj, and A. Garg, “GROOV: A geographic routing over V ANETs and its performance evaluation,” in Preceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBE- COM), 2012, pp. 1670–1675

  19. [27]

    Geographic routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks (V ANETs): A survey,

    S. Boussoufa-Lahlah, F. Semchedine, and L. Bouallouche-Medjkoune, “Geographic routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks (V ANETs): A survey,” V ehicular Communications, vol. 11, pp. 20–31, 2018

  20. [28]

    PGRP: Predictive geo- graphic routing protocol for vanets,

    R. Karimi and S. Shokrollahi, “PGRP: Predictive geo- graphic routing protocol for vanets,” Computer Networks, vol. 141, pp. 67–81, 2018

  21. [29]

    GPSR: greedy perimeter state- less routing for wireless networks,

    B. Karp and H. T. Kung, “GPSR: greedy perimeter state- less routing for wireless networks,” in Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom) , 2000, pp. 243–254

  22. [30]

    TGRV: A trust-based geographic routing protocol for V ANETs,

    S. Shokrollahi and M. Dehghan, “TGRV: A trust-based geographic routing protocol for V ANETs,” Ad Hoc Net- works, vol. 140, p. 103062, 2023

  23. [31]

    Link stability based optimized routing framework for software defined vehicular networks,

    K. L. K. Sudheera, M. Ma, and P . H. J. Chong, “Link stability based optimized routing framework for software defined vehicular networks,” IEEE Transactions on V e- hicular T echnology, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 2934–2945, 2019

  24. [32]

    New routing method based on sticky bacteria algorithm and link stability for V ANET,

    J. Zhang, L. Zhang, D. gan Zhang, T. Zhang, S. Wang, and C. hui Zou, “New routing method based on sticky bacteria algorithm and link stability for V ANET,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 166, p. 103682, 2025

  25. [33]

    Driving path stability in V ANETs,

    M. Laroui, A. Sellami, B. Nour, H. Moungla, H. Afifi, and S. B. Hacene, “Driving path stability in V ANETs,” in Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Confer- ence (GLOBECOM) , 2018, pp. 1–6

  26. [34]

    Predictive hybrid routing with multi objective optimiza- tion model for opportunistic routing for V ANET,

    A. H. Abbas, A. J. Ahmed, S. A. Rashid, N. F. Abdulsat- tar, M. H. Hassan, M. A. Jubair, and M. I. Habelalmateen, “Predictive hybrid routing with multi objective optimiza- tion model for opportunistic routing for V ANET,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Engineeri...

  27. [35]

    Epidemic routing for partiall y connected ad hoc networks,

    A. V ahdat and D. Becker, “Epidemic routing for partiall y connected ad hoc networks,” Duke University, Tech. Rep., 2000

  28. [36]

    MORE: A network coding approach to opportunis- tic routing,

    S. Chachulski, M. Jennings, S. Katti, and D. Katabi, “MORE: A network coding approach to opportunis- tic routing,” Tech. Rep. MIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-049, Jun. 2006

  29. [37]

    A survey on opportunistic routing in wireless communication networks,

    N. Chakchouk, “A survey on opportunistic routing in wireless communication networks,” IEEE Communica- tions Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2214–2241, 2015

  30. [38]

    Optimization driven multipath routing for the video transmission in the V ANET,

    S. More and U. L. Naik, “Optimization driven multipath routing for the video transmission in the V ANET,” in Proceedings of IEEE Global Conference on Wireless Computing and Networking (GCWCN) , 2018, pp. 6–10

  31. [39]

    Optimal multipath routing for video transmission in V ANETs,

    S. More and U. Naik, “Optimal multipath routing for video transmission in V ANETs,” Wireless Personal Com- munications, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 805–827, Aug. 2020

  32. [40]

    Multi-path routing protocol for the video service in UA V-assisted V ANETs,

    C. Zhao, Q. Zeng, Y . Tang, and B. Y ang, “Multi-path routing protocol for the video service in UA V-assisted V ANETs,” in Proceedings of IEEE V ehicular T echnology Conference (VTC) , 2021, pp. 1–5

  33. [41]

    Boucheron, G

    S. Boucheron, G. Lugosi, and P . Massart, Concentration Inequalities: A Nonasymptotic Theory of Independence . Oxford University Press, 2013

  34. [42]

    Microscopic traffic simu- lation using SUMO,

    P . A. L´ opez, M. Behrisch, L. Bieker-Walz, J. Erdmann, Y .-P . Fl¨ otter¨ od, R. Hilbrich, L. L¨ ucken, J. Rummel, P . Wagner, and E. Wießner, “Microscopic traffic simu- lation using SUMO,” in Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation...

  35. [43]

    G. F. Riley and T. R. Henderson, The ns-3 Network Simulator, K. Wehrle, M. G¨ unes ¸, and J. Gross, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010

  36. [44]

    Rep., 2010

    IEEE, “IEEE Std 802.11p-2010: IEEE standard for infor- mation technology—telecommunications and informa- tion exchange between systems—local and metropolitan area networks—specific requirements—part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specificat...

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.