Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Deconstructing Implicit Beliefs in Visual Data Journalism: Unstable Meanings Behind Data as Truth & Design for Insight

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A deconstructive reading of 17 journalism interviews exposes contradictory beliefs behind 'data as truth' and 'design for insight'.

desk verdict A genuine methodological first for critical visualization, but the protocol guarantees the binaries it reports, so read it as a worked interpretation rather than a discovery about journalists' beliefs. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12377 v3 pith:YBLZIRA2 submitted 2025-07-16 cs.HC

Ke Er Amy Zhang , Jodie Jenkinson , Laura Garrison This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords visualizationvisualdatajournalismepistemologycriticaltheorypoststructuralismgenealogydeconstructionbinaryoppositions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the everyday working beliefs of visual data journalists are not stable foundations but inherited, contradictory assumptions. Reading transcripts of interviews with 17 newsroom practitioners through the lens of deconstruction, the authors surface two binary oppositions that structure what journalists say and leave unsaid: data as objective versus subjective truth, and design as humanistic versus mechanistic insight. In each pair the journalists favor one side, objectivity and humanism, yet their own practice shows the two sides depend on each other, so the oppositions collapse when examined closely. A genealogical analysis then traces these beliefs from the Renaissance to the Information Age to show that they are products of societal forces and paradigm shifts rather than timeless truths. A sympathetic reader would care because these inherited beliefs shape which stories get told, how vulnerable groups are represented, and what counts as successful visualization.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a deconstructive reading protocol applied to interview transcripts, built on the concepts of signifier, trace, and différance: the signifier is the word used, the trace is what is left unspoken but shapes meaning, and différance is the fluid deferral of meaning that lets a term shift with context. The protocol identifies a central tension in the corpus, finds the binary opposition it rests on, determines which term is privileged, locates statements that undermine the hierarchy, and then shows the collapse of the opposition. This is paired with a genealogical analysis that threads the two oppositions through historical paradigm shifts, showing how external social, technical, and political forces shaped which term came to be favored.

What would settle it

A member-checking study would settle the claim: return the paper's analysis to the 17 interviewed journalists and ask whether 'objectivity over subjectivity' and 'humanism over mechanism' name tensions they recognize in their own reasoning; if most say the framing is unrecognizable, the claimed surfacing of implicit beliefs would be shown to be the analysts' construction rather than a property of the journalists' beliefs.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that two sets of opposing implicit beliefs, objectivity/subjectivity and humanism/mechanism, underlie visual data journalism, that the privileged term in each pair is maintained by what is left unsaid, and that both oppositions break down under deconstructive analysis because each side is dependent on the other. The paper further claims that genealogy shows these beliefs are historically contingent, the product of paradigm shifts from the Renaissance through the Information Age, not self-enclosed truths. The upshot, on the paper's own terms, is that 'data as truth' and 'design for insight' rest on unstable meanings, and that recognizing this instability opens room for critical reflection on what success in data storytelling means.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that what journalists leave unsaid, and the binary structure of the way they talk, reveals beliefs they actually hold; if a reader does not grant that interpretive premise, the two oppositions are the analysts' construction projected onto the transcripts rather than a discovery about the journalists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the two oppositions really govern practice, a journalist's stated commitment to objective 'data as truth' coexists with subjective craft choices, and the objectivity norm functions as a strategic ritual that protects reporting while casting doubt on creative expertise.
  • Because the humanism/mechanism pair collapses, humanistic design goals such as emotional weight, dignity, and cultural representation can only be expressed through a design language historically tied to mechanistic efficiency, so purely humanistic or purely mechanistic design is not actually available.
  • Because the binaries are products of historical paradigm shifts rather than stable structures, newsroom values can change: recognizing their contingency lets practitioners deliberately adopt alternative orientations, such as treating data as plastic or designing around missing data.
  • Critical-theory methods such as deconstruction and genealogy reframe what counts as success in visualization research, expanding the questions researchers ask beyond efficiency and insight.
  • For visualization at large, the same inherited binaries likely shape how researchers and tool-builders think about data and design, so the findings carry beyond journalism into the broader field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same two oppositions may structure other data-facing practices, such as scientific communication, personal analytics, and policy dashboards; an interview study in one such domain would test that transfer.
  • As an editorial extension, the method could be turned on visualizations as texts rather than interview language: a deconstructive reading of award-winning graphics would predict which rhetorical devices carry implicit truth claims.
  • A testable extension would use vignette experiments: if the analysis is right, journalists' talk of 'real data' versus 'illustration' should predict their design choices on sensitive stories.
  • The authors explicitly leave out non-Western genealogies, so a parallel analysis tracing objectivity and humanism through non-Western design traditions would test whether these binary oppositions are Western-specific or general.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a deconstructive and genealogical analysis of semi-structured interviews with 17 visual data journalists, claiming to surface two implicit binary oppositions in their epistemic beliefs: objectivity/subjectivity underlying 'data as truth' and humanism/mechanism underlying 'design for insight.' The authors argue that these binaries are historically inherited, unstable, and collapse when examined closely, and they position deconstruction as a transferable method for qualitative interview analysis in visualization research. The paper includes a detailed description of the interview protocol, the deconstructive analysis workflow, a genealogical historical narrative, and a discussion of implications for visual data journalism and critical visualization research.

Significance. If the claimed binary oppositions and their collapse were empirically well grounded, the contribution would be a genuinely novel and provocative extension of critical-theoretic approaches in visualization, complementing recent feminist, genealogical, and poststructural work. The paper is transparent about its limitations, provides its interview materials and analysis boards in supplemental open materials, and offers a clear methodological template for applying deconstruction to interview transcripts. Its value as a critical and theoretical exercise is considerable even if the empirical claim about journalists' implicit beliefs needs more support. The paper also invites useful reflection on epistemic virtues such as objectivity and mechanism in data journalism, and on how qualitative visualization research could engage with poststructural theory.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.2, Step 2] The deconstructive protocol instructs analysts to 'find the binary opposition that this tension rests on' and then to identify the privileged term and locate statements that undermine it. Because Sec. 5.1 already asserts that Western meaning is constituted by binary hierarchies and that such binaries collapse under examination, the method guarantees the formal shape of the reported findings before any transcript is read. The paper needs to clarify what evidence would count against the presence of a given binary in the journalists' own beliefs, or to explicitly reframe the contribution as an interpretive deconstructive reading rather than an empirical discovery about participant psychology. A participant-level coding matrix or a reflexive audit trail showing where each binary was instantiated would substantially strengthen the claim.
  2. [Sec. 8.1] The statement that 'This collapse is consistent across all participants regardless of their position in the newsroom' is not supported by the evidence as presented. Section 6 quotes only a subset of the 17 participants (for example, J07, D01, J08, J09, D02, J04, D04), and no participant-by-participant accounting or systematic matrix is provided. To support a universal claim about all participants, the authors should either qualify the claim to the participants whose statements are actually shown and analyzed, or include a complete participant-level exhibit in the supplemental materials.
  3. [Sec. 6.1] The central inference from reported traces—e.g., that data are 'a prerequisite for a successful, legitimate story'—to the implicit belief that 'objectivity is required for legitimate reporting' is an analyst construction that participants were not asked to confirm. No member-checking, triangulation, or independent validation step is described. Since this inference is load-bearing for the paper's primary contribution, the authors should either add a validation procedure or consistently frame the results as an interpretive deconstructive reading, making clear that the 'implicit beliefs' are the analysts' theoretically informed reconstruction rather than beliefs established as held by the interviewees.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.2] In the transcription description, 'for each the interview' should read 'for each interview.'
  2. [Sec. 6.1] The typo 'signifer' should be corrected to 'signifier.'
  3. [Sec. 6.1] The phrase 'Other participants similarly elude to the strength and power of data' should use 'allude' rather than 'elude.'
  4. [Sec. 7] The word 'anaylsis' should be corrected to 'analysis.'
  5. [Figs. 3 and 4] The color-coding of quotes by binary term may be difficult to perceive in grayscale print; adding a textual label or symbol alongside each quote would improve accessibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Deconstructive protocol mandates the binary-and-collapse structure it reports, making the central claim partially circular.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 5.2 (deconstructive analysis protocol, steps 2–5) and Sec. 6.1–6.2 (results)]
    "2. Find the binary opposition that this tension rests on (Fig. 2B). 3. Identify which of the binary terms is privileged. The “side” of the opposition that the speaker supports reveals the implicit belief (the trace, Fig. 2C). ... 5. Show how the hierarchy collapses through our analysis (Fig. 2E)."

    The protocol instructs analysts, for each identified tension, to find the binary opposition on which it rests, to identify the privileged term, and then to show how the hierarchy collapses. Sec. 5.1 has already asserted that Western meaning is structured by binary hierarchies and that binaries collapse under examination. Therefore the reported two binaries and their collapse are guaranteed by the analytic lens before any transcript is read; the method's output is the method's mandate. The specific contents (objectivity/subjectivity, humanism/mechanism) are grounded in selected quotes, but the universal claim in Sec. 8.1 that the collapse is 'consistent across all participants' is not supported by any per-participant coding—the quotes were chosen post hoc to instantiate each pole.

full rationale

The paper is transparent about its deconstructive lens, and the two specific binaries are not named in advance; they are anchored in participant quotes, so the study has some independent empirical content. However, the central claim—that visual data journalism rests on two opposing implicit beliefs that collapse—reduces in form to the analytic protocol of Sec. 5.2, which instructs analysts to locate binary oppositions and demonstrate their collapse. Deconstruction theory (Sec. 5.1) already supplies the premise that Western meaning is binary and unstable, and the method operationalizes that premise. Thus the existence of binaries and their collapse is partially circular, even though the particular binary contents are data-grounded. The genealogy (Sec. 7) cites Correll & Garrison [25], coauthored by this paper's author, but only as an example of the genealogical approach; the method itself rests on Foucault, an external source, so this self-citation is not load-bearing. The paper also acknowledges interpretive flexibility in Sec. 8.2 ('a new team of authors may trace a different genealogy based on a different set of binary oppositions'), which weakens the discovery claim further. Overall, partial circularity in the central interpretive step, but not a wholly manufactured result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a qualitative interpretive study with no quantitative fitting. The central claims rest on poststructuralist premises (unstable meaning, binary oppositions, the analyst's access to traces), on a particular genealogy of Western ideas, and on the representativeness of the interview sample. These are listed as axioms. No free parameters or invented entities are present.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption All language and meaning are inherently unstable and structured by binary oppositions in which one term is privileged.
    Sec 2 and 5.1 introduce deconstruction as assuming instability of meaning and binary hierarchies; the analysis applies this to interview transcripts.
  • ad hoc to paper The researcher can identify the trace, the unspoken meanings that implicitly impact meaning, from the transcripts.
    Sec 5.2 asks 'what words or concepts are left unsaid' and relies on the authors' inference of traces from quotes.
  • domain assumption A genealogy of Western philosophy and visualization history from the Renaissance to the Information Age adequately contextualizes the beliefs of today's journalists.
    Sec 5.3 and 7 select historical sources and visual examples; the paper acknowledges the anachronism of applying modern definitions to past periods.
  • domain assumption The 17 interviewed journalists are sufficiently representative of visual data journalism as a field to support claims about shared beliefs.
    Sec 4.1 describes purposive sampling; Sec 9 acknowledges most participants are from North America and Europe and about half are from the authors' personal network.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deconstructing Implicit Beliefs in Visual Data Journalism: Unstable Meanings Behind Data as Truth & Design for Insight." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YBLZIRA2

@misc{pith2026250712377,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deconstructing Implicit Beliefs in Visual Data Journalism: Unstable Meanings Behind Data as Truth & Design for Insight},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YBLZIRA2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12377}
}
read the original abstract

We conduct a deconstructive reading of a qualitative interview study with 17 visual data journalists from newsrooms across the globe. We borrow a deconstruction approach from literary critique to explore the instability of meaning in language and reveal implicit beliefs in words and ideas. Through our analysis we surface two sets of opposing implicit beliefs in visual data journalism: objectivity/subjectivity and humanism/mechanism. We contextualize these beliefs through a genealogical analysis, which brings deconstruction theory into practice by providing a historic backdrop for these opposing perspectives. Our analysis shows that these beliefs held within visual data journalism are not self-enclosed but rather a product of external societal forces and paradigm shifts over time. Through this work, we demonstrate how thinking with critical theories such as deconstruction and genealogy can reframe "success" in visual data storytelling and diversify visualization research outcomes. These efforts push the ways in which we as researchers produce domain knowledge to examine the sociotechnical issues of today's values towards datafication and data visualization. All supplemental materials for this work are available at osf.io/5fr48.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12377 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A conceptual overview of our analysis that (1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Deconstructive analysis applied to the binary opposition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A visual overview of our deconstructive analysis of interview [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A visual overview of our deconstructive analysis of interview [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A timeline tracing the fluid and intertwined lineages of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Charting the Moral Universe: Capturing Virtues and Values of Data Visualization Practice

    cs.HC 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 20-expert interview study yields a taxonomy of 68 values in nine virtue clusters for ethical data-visualization practice.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Akbaba, L

    D. Akbaba, L. Klein, and M. Meyer. Entanglements for visualization: Changing research outcomes through feminist theory. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 31(1):1279–1289, 2025. doi: 10/g8pjt5

    2025

  2. [2]

    Akbaba, D

    D. Akbaba, D. Lange, M. Correll, A. Lex, and M. Meyer. Troubling collaboration: Matters of care for visualization design study. In Proc CHI, article no. 812, 15 pages. ACM, New York, 2023. doi: 10/gr8pgp

    2023

  3. [3]

    Two heads are better than one

    D. Akbaba and M. Meyer. “Two heads are better than one”: Pair- interviews for visualization. In Proc VIS (SP), pp. 206–210. IEEE Comp Soc, Los Alamitos, 2023. doi: 10/gtcpv3

    2023

  4. [4]

    Antonopoulos and M.-A

    N. Antonopoulos and M.-A. Karyotakis. Data journalism. In SAGE Int Encycl Mass Media Soc, pp. 440–441. SAGE, 2020. doi: 10/ptgn

    2020

  5. [5]

    B. Bach, M. Stefaner, J. Boy, S. Drucker, L. Bartram, J. Wood, P. Ciuc- carelli, Y . Engelhardt, U. Köppen, and B. Tversky. Narrative design patterns for data-driven storytelling. In Data-Driven Storytelling, pp. 107–133. AK Peters, 2018. doi: 10/ptgp

    2018

  6. [6]

    F. Bacon. The Advancement of Learning. Modern Library, New York, 1851

  7. [7]

    K. Barad. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning . Duke UP, Durham, 2007. doi: 10/vz6

    2007

  8. [8]

    K. Barad. Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. In Diffracted Worlds-Diffractive Readings, pp. 4–23. Routledge, 2018. doi: 10/gcv65j

    2018

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    Bardzell

    S. Bardzell. Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proc CHI, pp. 1301–1310. ACM, 2010. doi: 10/d7c545

    2010

  2. [10]

    Bartram, M

    L. Bartram, M. Correll, and M. Tory. Untidy data: The unreasonable effectiveness of tables. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 28(1):686–696,

  3. [11]

    J. Bertin. Semiology of Graphics. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1983

    1983

  4. [12]

    Bertschi

    S. Bertschi. Without knowledge visualization? Proposing a deconstruc- tivist approach to metaphor, meaning and perception. In Proc IV, pp. 342–347. IEEE Comp Soc, Los Alamitos, 2007. doi: 10/bwrjz4

    2007

  5. [13]

    Bødker, S

    S. Bødker, S. Fox, N. Lalone, M. Marathe, and R. Soden. (Re)Connecting history to the theory and praxis of HCI. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact, 30(2), article no. 16, 7 pages, 2023. doi: 10/gsnqqr

    2023

  6. [14]

    Bradshaw

    P. Bradshaw. The inverted pyramid of data journalism, 2024. onlinejournalismblog.com/../ive-updated-the-inverted-pyramid-of-data- journalism-and-brought-together-resources-for-every-stage

    2024

  7. [15]

    J. Branch. Snow fall: The avalanche at Tunnel Creek. The New York Times, 2012. nytimes.com/../snow-fall

    2012

  8. [16]

    Braun and V

    V . Braun and V . Clarke.Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE, London, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Brunette and D

    P. Brunette and D. Wills, eds. Deconstruction and the Visual Arts: Art, Media, Architecture. Cambridge UP, New York, 1994. doi: 10/bxcfq9

    1994

  10. [18]

    Cai and M

    M. Cai and M. Kay. Watching the election sausage get made: How data journalists visualize the vote counting process in US elections. In Proc CHI, article no. 391, 19 pages. ACM, New York, 2024. doi: 10/ps66

    2024

  11. [19]

    Campbell

    J. Campbell. The Hero With a Thousand Faces. New World Library, Novato, 2008

    2008

  12. [20]

    ˇCenˇek and Š

    J. ˇCenˇek and Š. ˇCenˇek. Cross-cultural differences in visual perception. J Educ Cult Soc, 6(1):187–206, 2015. doi: 10/ptgv

    2015

  13. [21]

    Chiasson and E

    M. Chiasson and E. Davidson. Reconsidering deconstruction in infor- mation systems research. Eur J Inf Syst , 21(2):192–206, 2012. doi: 10/cmfkgt

    2012

  14. [22]

    W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill. Graphical perception: Theory, experi- mentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. J Am Stat Assoc, 79(387):531–554, 1984. doi: 10/cbtq7v

    1984

  15. [23]

    J. E. Cohen. Between Truth and Power. Oxford UP, UK, 2019. doi: 10/ptt6

    2019

  16. [24]

    M. Correll. Ethical dimensions of visualization research. In Proc CHI, article no. 188, 13 pages. ACM, New York, 2019. doi: 10/ghn348

    2019

  17. [25]

    Correll and L

    M. Correll and L. Garrison. When the body became data: Historical data cultures and anatomical illustration. In Proc CHI, article no. 764, 18 pages. ACM, New York, 2024. doi: 10/ptgw

    2024

  18. [26]

    Daston and P

    L. Daston and P. L. Galison. Objectivity. Princeton UP, USA, 2021. doi: 10/gs8dsj

    2021

  19. [27]

    J. Derrida. Of Grammatology. Johns Hopkins UP, Baltimore, 1974

    1974

  20. [28]

    J. Derrida. Dissemination. A&C Black, London, 2004. doi: 10/ptt7

    2004

  21. [29]

    Descartes

    R. Descartes. Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections From the Objections and Replies. Oxford UP, UK, 2008

    2008

  22. [30]

    Dhawka and S

    P. Dhawka and S. Dasgupta. The social construction of visualizations: Practitioner challenges and experiences of visualizing race and gender demographic data. In Proc CHI, article no. 780, 16 pages. ACM, New York, 2025. doi: 10/ptgz

    2025

  23. [31]

    D’Ignazio and L

    C. D’Ignazio and L. F. Klein. Data Feminism. MIT press, Cambridge,

  24. [32]

    M. Dörk, P. Feng, C. Collins, and S. Carpendale. Critical InfoVis: Exploring the politics of visualization. In CHI EA, article no. 780, 9 pages. ACM, New York, 2013. doi: 10/ghdrsh

    2013

  25. [33]

    E. P. Douglas. Beyond the interpretive: Finding meaning in qualitative data. In ASEE Ann Conf & Expo, 12 pages. ASEE, Columbus, 2017. doi: 10/ptgx

    2017

  26. [34]

    J. Drucker. Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Harvard UP, Cambridge, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    J. Drucker. Information visualization and/as enunciation. J Doc , 73(5):903–916, 2017. doi: 10/gcgfw6

    2017

  28. [36]

    U. Eco. Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition . World Literature Today, Norman, 2000. doi: 10/dq6cbs

    2000

  29. [37]

    Engebretsen and H

    M. Engebretsen and H. Kennedy. Data Visualization in Society. Amster- dam UP, Netherlands, 2020. doi: 10.5117/9789463722902

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Engebretsen, H

    M. Engebretsen, H. Kennedy, and W. Weber. Visualization practices in Scandinavian newsrooms: A qualitative study. In Proc IV, pp. 296–300. IEEE Comp Soc, Los Alamitos, 2017. doi: 10/d726

    2017

  31. [39]

    Coronavirus tracked: See how your country compares,

    Financial Times. Coronavirus tracked: See how your country compares,

  32. [40]

    Foucault, P

    M. Foucault, P. Rabinow, and N. S. Rose. The Essential Foucault: Selections From Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984. New Press, New York, 2003

    1954

  33. [41]

    Friendly

    M. Friendly. A Brief History of Data Visualization . Springer, Berlin,

  34. [42]

    Friendly and D

    M. Friendly and D. J. Denis. Milestones in the history of the- matic cartography, statistical graphics, and data visualization, 2001. datavis.ca/milestones

    2001

  35. [43]

    Fu and J

    Y . Fu and J. Stasko. More than data stories: Broadening the role of visualization in contemporary journalism. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 30(8):5240–5259, 2024. doi: 10/kxqv

    2024

  36. [44]

    Garretón, F

    M. Garretón, F. Morini, P. Celhay, M. Dörk, and D. Parra. Attitudinal effects of data visualizations and illustrations in data stories. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 30(7):4039–4054, 2024. doi: 10/ptg2

    2024

  37. [45]

    C. C. Gillispie. The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas. Princeton UP, USA, 1960. doi: 10/ptt9

    1960

  38. [46]

    B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory . Aldine Transaction, Piscataway, 1967

    1967

  39. [47]

    S. Hao, Z. Wang, B. Bach, and L. Pschetz. Design patterns for data- driven news articles. In Proc CHI, article no. 231, 16 pages. ACM, New York, 2024. doi: 10/ptg4

    2024

  40. [48]

    What is poststructuralism?

    B. E. Harcourt. An answer to the question: "What is poststructuralism?". In Public Law Working Paper, vol. 156. Univ. Chicago, 2007. doi: 10/ fx2mvq

    2007

  41. [49]

    Hawkes and T

    T. Hawkes and T. Hawkes. Structuralism & Semiotics. Methuen Publish- ing, London, 1977. doi: 10/ptvb

    1977

  42. [50]

    Hennink and B

    M. Hennink and B. N. Kaiser. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative re- search: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med, 292:114523,

  43. [51]

    R. Hooke. Micrographia. J. Martyn and J. Allestry, London, 1665. doi: 10/c8kv6z

  44. [52]

    A. B. Howard. The Art and Science of Data-Driven Journalism . Columbia Univ., 2014. doi: 10/gnff22

    2014

  45. [53]

    D. Howarth. Poststructuralism and After: Structure, Subjectivity and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2013

    2013

  46. [54]

    Hullman and N

    J. Hullman and N. Diakopoulos. Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 17(12):2231– 2240, 2011. doi: 10/dk9mdx

    2011

  47. [55]

    A. Y . Jackson and L. Mazzei.Thinking With Theory in Qualitative Re- search: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives. Routledge, London,

  48. [56]

    F. Jameson. The Years of Theory: Postwar French Thought to the Present. Verso Books, New York, 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Kauer, M

    T. Kauer, M. Dörk, and B. Bach. Towards collective storytelling: Investi- gating audience annotations in data visualizations. IEEE Comput Graph Appl, pp. 1–14, 2025. to appear. doi: 10/ptg5

    2025

  50. [58]

    Kindlmann and C

    G. Kindlmann and C. Scheidegger. An algebraic process for visualization design. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 20(12):2181–2190, 2014. doi: 10/f6qjgj

    2014

  51. [59]

    C. Koopman. Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity. Indiana UP, Bloomington, 2013

    2013

  52. [60]

    T. S. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , vol. 962. Univ. Chicago Press, 1997. doi: 10/g5qr

    1997

  53. [61]

    X. Lan, Y . Wu, and N. Cao. Affective visualization design: Leveraging the emotional impact of data. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 30(1):1–11,

  54. [62]

    Lazar, B

    A. Lazar, B. Jelen, A. Pradhan, and K. A. Siek. Adopting diffractive reading to advance HCI research: A case study on technology for aging. ACM Trans Comput-Hum. Interact, 28(5), article no. 32, 29 pages, 2021. doi: 10/gmxz72

    2021

  55. [63]

    B. Lee, N. H. Riche, P. Isenberg, and S. Carpendale. More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually shared stories. IEEE Comput Graph Appl, 35(5):84–90, 2015. doi: 10/gfw4vv

    2015

  56. [64]

    J. Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford UP, UK,

  57. [65]

    Marriott

    K. Marriott. The Golden Age of Data Visualization: How Did We Get Here? CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2024. doi: 10/ptvc

    2024

  58. [66]

    A. Maslow. Motivation and Personality. Harper, New York, 1954

    1954

  59. [67]

    L. A. Mazzei. Silent listenings: Deconstructive practices in discourse- based research. Educ Res, 33(2):26–34, 2004. doi: 10/c7nhq5

    2004

  60. [68]

    L. A. Mazzei. Postqualitative inquiry: Or the necessity of theory. Qual Inq, 27(2):198–200, 2021. doi: 10/gk33ph

    2021

  61. [69]

    Meuschke, L

    M. Meuschke, L. A. Garrison, N. N. Smit, B. Bach, S. Mittenentzwei, V . Weiß, S. Bruckner, K. Lawonn, and B. Preim. Narrative medical visualization to communicate disease data. Comput Graph, 107:144–157,

  62. [70]

    Morini, A

    F. Morini, A. Eschenbacher, J. Hartmann, and M. Dörk. From shock to shift: Data visualization for constructive climate journalism. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 30(1):1413–1423, 2024. doi: 10/gtsxdt

    2024

  63. [71]

    I. F. Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, A. D. Smith, A. To, and K. Toyama. Critical race theory for HCI. In Proc CHI, article no. 265, 16 pages. ACM, New York, 2020. doi: 10/ggztmc

    2020

  64. [72]

    M. Onuoha. On missing data sets. Github, 2018. github.com/MimiOnuoha /missing-datasets

    2018

  65. [73]

    Playfair

    W. Playfair. Eléments de Statistique. Batilliot et Genets, Paris, 1802

  66. [74]

    Pokojná, T

    H. Pokojná, T. Isenberg, S. Bruckner, B. Kozlíková, and L. Garri- son. The language of infographics: Toward understanding conceptual metaphor use in scientific storytelling. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 31(1):371–381, 2025. doi: 10/njn3

    2025

  67. [75]

    P. Prasad. Crafting Qualitative Research: Beyond Positivist Traditions. Routledge, New York, 2017. doi: 10/pwhk

    2017

  68. [76]

    S. Rendgen. History of Information Graphics. Taschen, Cologne, 2019

    2019

  69. [77]

    Rivkin and M

    J. Rivkin and M. Ryan. Literary theory: An Anthology. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, 2017

    2017

  70. [78]

    H. Robin. The Scientific Image: From Cave to Computer. Harry Abrams, New York, 1992

    1992

  71. [79]

    S. Rogers. Wikileaks data journalism: how we handled the data. The Guardian, 2011. theguardian.com/../wikileaks-data-journalism

    2011

  72. [80]

    K. Ross, P. Sengupta, and W. Willett. (Almost) all data is absent data. In VISions of the Future, 2024. doi: 10/ptg7

    2024

  73. [81]

    B. Russell. History of Western Philosophy. Routledge, London, 2004. doi: 10/ghmmhq

    2004

  74. [82]

    Schliesser

    E. Schliesser. Three cheers for (methodological) anachronism!, 2014. digressionsnimpressions.typepad.com/../three-cheers-for-anachronism.html

    2014

  75. [83]

    Segel and J

    E. Segel and J. Heer. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 16(6):1139–1148, 2010. doi: 10/dnqx5m

    2010

  76. [84]

    Sharma, N

    V . Sharma, N. Kumar, and B. Nardi. Post-growth human–computer interaction. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact, 31(1):1–37, 2023. doi: 10/g7csr8

    2023

  77. [85]

    D. Shi, X. Xu, F. Sun, Y . Shi, and N. Cao. Calliope: Automatic visual data story generation from a spreadsheet. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 27(2):453–463, 2021. doi: 10/gh52ts

    2021

  78. [86]

    L. Shiner. Reading Foucault: Anti-method and the genealogy of power- knowledge. Hist Theory, 21(3):382–398, 1982. doi: 10/dzhckj

    1982

  79. [87]

    Showkat and E

    D. Showkat and E. P. Baumer. Where do stories come from? Examining the exploration process in investigative data journalism. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact, 5(CSCW2), article no. 390, 31 pages, 2021. doi: 10/ps9s

    2021

  80. [88]

    M. Sun, L. Cai, W. Cui, Y . Wu, Y . Shi, and N. Cao. Erato: Cooperative data story editing via fact interpolation. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 29(1):983–993, 2023. doi: 10/ptg8

    2023

  81. [89]

    Taherdoost

    H. Taherdoost. Sampling methods in research methodology: How to choose a sampling technique for research.Int J Acad Res Manag, 5(2):18– 27, 2016. doi: 10/ggskz3

    2016

  82. [90]

    Tamboukou

    M. Tamboukou. Writing genealogies: An exploration of Foucault’s strategies for doing research. Discourse Stud Cult Polit Educ, 20(2):201– 217, 1999. doi: 10/c9dj43

    1999

  83. [91]

    Globalisation has marginalised many regions in the rich world, 2017

    The Economist. Globalisation has marginalised many regions in the rich world, 2017. economist.com/../globalisation-has-marginalised-many-regions-in- the-rich-world

    2017

  84. [92]

    Live presidential forecast

    The New York Times. Live presidential forecast. The New York Times,

  85. [93]

    G. Tuchman. Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of news- men’s notions of objectivity. Am J Sociol, 77(4):660–679, 1972. doi: 10/dctjnq

    1972

  86. [94]

    E. R. Tufte and P. R. Graves-Morris. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, 1983

    1983

  87. [95]

    J. Tukey. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1977

    1977

  88. [96]

    L. Tyson. Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide. Routledge, New York, 2023. doi: 10/ptvg

    2023

  89. [97]

    Weber, M

    W. Weber, M. Engebretsen, and H. Kennedy. Data stories: Rethinking journalistic storytelling in the context of data journalism. Stud Commun Sci, 2018(1):191–206, 2018. doi: 10/ps7d

    2018

  90. [98]

    Weber and H

    W. Weber and H. Rall. Data visualization in online journalism and its implications for the production process. In Proc IV, pp. 349–356. IEEE Comp Soc, Los Alamitos, 2012. doi: 10/d73x

    2012

  91. [99]

    swaying the public

    F. Yang, M. Cai, C. Mortenson, H. Fakhari, A. D. Lokmanoglu, N. Di- akopoulos, E. C. Nisbet, and M. Kay. The backstory to “swaying the public”: A design chronicle of election forecast visualizations. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 31(1):426–436, 2025. doi: 10/pthb

    2025

  92. [100]

    F. Yang, M. Cai, C. Mortenson, H. Fakhari, A. D. Lokmanoglu, J. Hull- man, S. Franconeri, N. Diakopoulos, E. C. Nisbet, and M. Kay. Swaying the public? Impacts of election forecast visualizations on emotion, trust, and intention in the 2022 US midterms. IEEE Trans Vis Comput G...

    2022

  93. [2021]

    ig.ft.com/coronavirus-chart

  94. [2024]

    nytimes.com/interactive/../us/elections/results-president-forecast-needle

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.