Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 84 references

Video-Guided Text-to-Music Generation Using Public Domain Movie Collections

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that adding a lightweight video adapter to MusicGen and fine-tuning on OSSL, a new public-domain movie dataset with mood annotations, improves generated film soundtracks' mood and genre fit over text-only baselines.

desk verdict A genuinely useful dataset, but the video-conditioning claim needs one ablation and some error bars before I'd buy it. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12573 v3 pith:YCGRR6Z2 submitted 2025-06-14 cs.SD cs.MMeess.AS

Haven Kim , Zachary Novack , Weihan Xu , Julian McAuley , Hao-Wen Dong This is my paper
classification cs.SDcs.MMeess.AS
keywords text-to-musicgenerationvideo-conditionedmusicfilmpublicdomaindatasetmoodannotationvideoadapterautoregressivetransformersoundtrackalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that text-to-music models can generate better film soundtracks if they also see the movie. The authors build OSSL, a 36.5-hour dataset of public-domain movie clips paired with their original soundtracks and with four-way valence-arousal mood labels, and attach a small video adapter to the MusicGen text-to-music transformer so its cross-attention can attend to video embeddings as well as text. Fine-tuning on OSSL improves the medium-size model in both objective metrics (lower FAD and KL, higher CLAP similarity and precision) and in human ratings of mood, genre, and quality, particularly when video is included. The authors position OSSL as the first self-hosted film-music dataset with mood annotations and release the data, code, and demo to support reproducible work.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a video adapter inserted into MusicGen's cross-attention. Each attention head adds a second term that runs the hidden states against linearly projected video embeddings from a pretrained video transformer, with a trainable scale $\alpha$ and learnable projection matrices, while all original MusicGen weights are frozen. On the data side, the pipeline that constructs OSSL does much of the work: source separation isolates music from dialogue and effects, silence detection segments clips, an event detector filters non-musical audio, and chroma-distance matching pairs each clip to the correct soundtrack before human verification and mood annotation. The combination lets the model attend to both text and video during autoregressive token generation.

What would settle it

Train M-MULTI's exact adapter but feed it no video information, for instance zeroed or random video embeddings, and compare on OES-Com; if it matches M-MULTI's FAD, KL, and human ratings, the video signal is not the cause of the improvement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that video conditioning, trained on a dedicated movie-soundtrack dataset, improves a pretrained text-to-music model on the film-music task. Concretely, the paper reports that M-MULTI—MusicGen-Medium with a video adapter and frozen base—achieves the lowest FAD and KL divergence and the highest precision, CLAP audio similarity, and human ratings among all compared models on the public and commercial evaluation sets. The accompanying dataset OSSL is itself part of the contribution: roughly 36.5 hours of clips from 299 public-domain films, paired with downloaded soundtrack stems, manually verified mappings, and consensus mood annotations in four valence-arousal classes. The paper's own qualifier is that this benefit appears for the medium model; the small model with the adapter does not consistently beat text-only fine-tuning.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison that is meant to prove video helps (M-MULTI versus M-TEXT) also changes the training scheme—new adapter weights with a frozen base versus LoRA fine-tuning—so the paper assumes the score gap comes from the video input and not from that difference.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, filmmakers can get draft soundtracks from a model that has actually seen the scene, not just a text description of it, while still specifying mood and genre in the prompt.
  • Fine-tuning on public-domain films transfers to commercial film clips, since M-MULTI's best distributional-fidelity scores are measured against commercial soundtracks.
  • Because the base model stays frozen and only adapter weights are trained, the approach can be applied to larger text-to-music models at modest compute cost.
  • The OSSL dataset gives the community a reproducible, self-hosted resource for pairing video, music, and mood, filling a gap left by older film datasets that are unavailable or lack isolated soundtracks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test the paper does not run would separate the video signal from the adapter itself: train the same adapter architecture with blank or scrambled video embeddings, and if scores stay high, the improvement is coming from extra trainable capacity and the OSSL text labels rather than from watching the movie.
  • The four mood labels plus the video channel suggest a controllable interface where directors could type a mood such as 'nervous' while the model takes the scene visuals, an interaction the current evaluation only partially exercises.
  • The chroma-matching and manual-verification pipeline could be reused to expand OSSL to longer clips, dialogue-heavy scenes, or soundtracks with multiple concurrent music cues, where the current 30-second generation window may miss the dramatic arc.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Open Screen Soundtrack Library (OSSL), a dataset of public-domain movie clips paired with soundtracks and human-annotated mood labels, and proposes a video adapter for MusicGen that adds video-conditioned cross-attention to the text-based model. The authors fine-tune MusicGen-Small and MusicGen-Medium with this adapter on OSSL and evaluate against base models and LoRA-fine-tuned text-only models on two held-out sets (OES-Pub and OES-Com). The central claim is that video conditioning combined with the OSSL dataset enhances MusicGen-Medium in both objective distributional/paired fidelity and subjective mood/genre compatibility.

Significance. The dataset contribution is potentially significant for music information retrieval and multimodal generation research: OSSL is self-hosted, includes mood annotations, and is constructed with manual verification of clip-to-soundtrack mappings. The paper also provides reproducible artifacts (dataset, code, demo) and addresses an underexplored task of video-guided text-to-music generation. However, the evidence for the core methodological claim that the video adapter is responsible for the observed improvements is weakened by a confounded comparison and lack of statistical testing. If the confound is resolved and the improvements hold, the work would be a valuable step for film-music generation; as presented, the quantitative support for the video-specific benefit is not yet conclusive.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Eq. (2), Table 3] The comparison that is meant to isolate the benefit of video conditioning is M-MULTI versus M-TEXT, but these two models differ in two variables at once: M-MULTI uses newly initialized adapter weights with a frozen backbone, while M-TEXT uses LoRA fine-tuning of existing parameters. The observed differences (e.g., FAD 59.51 vs. 61.15 on OES-Pub; mood rating 6.20 vs. 5.20) could therefore arise from the training mechanism, added capacity, initialization, or regularization rather than from the video signal. To support the paper's central claim, the authors should add an ablation with a text-only adapter-trained model (the same adapter architecture without video input) or a video-ablated version of M-MULTI.
  2. [§6, Table 3] The objective metrics are reported as single point estimates with no error bars, repeated seeds, or significance tests, yet the text characterizes some results as 'significantly lower' and 'significantly higher' (e.g., KL divergence on both evaluation sets and Recall on OES-Com for S-TEXT and M-TEXT). Given the small gaps (e.g., KL 1.00 vs. 1.04 on OES-Pub; FAD 59.51 vs. 60.91 for M-MULTI vs. M-BASE), these claims need either confidence intervals, bootstrap estimates, or formal significance testing to establish that the differences exceed evaluation noise.
  3. [§5.6, Table 3, §7] The subjective evaluation rests on 15 participants, each rating 2 of 10 selected clips, and the 95% confidence intervals in Table 3 overlap substantially between M-MULTI and M-TEXT on all three dimensions (e.g., mood 6.20±1.05 vs. 5.20±0.99, quality 7.07±0.93 vs. 6.00±1.02). The abstract and Section 6 claim enhanced subjective mood and genre compatibility, but Section 7 itself concedes that 'the subjective evaluation requires further validation.' The subjective results should be presented as preliminary, or the evaluation should be expanded, to avoid overstating the evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2, first paragraph] Typo: 'In constrast' should be 'In contrast'.
  2. [§2, Adapter Mechanisms paragraph] Typo: 'autoregressive transformerr-based' should be 'autoregressive transformer-based'.
  3. [§5.3, final sentence] Remove the stray comma and period in 'to fully leverage the capabilities of text-to-music generation models,.'
  4. [Table 3 caption and §6] Typo: 'scroes' should be 'scores' in the caption and in the sentence 'the lowest FAD scores and highest Precision scroes'.
  5. [§5.1] The phrases 'fine-tune MusicGen-Small and MusicGen-Medium with video adapters' and later 'S-TEXT and M-TEXT ... apply Low-Rank Adaptation when fine-tuning' are slightly ambiguous; please clarify that the adapter-equipped models train only the new parameters while the base model remains frozen, and that the LoRA models train low-rank updates on existing parameters.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: held-out evaluation and external benchmarks carry the central claim; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is: construct OSSL from public-domain films using source separation, silence/event detection, chroma matching, and manual verification; fine-tune MusicGen variants with a frozen backbone plus new video-adapter weights; and evaluate on held-out OES-Pub/OES-Com plus human ratings. No model parameter is fit to the evaluation sets, and the evaluation references are external soundtracks not used for training. The M-MULTI versus M-TEXT comparison is confounded by the different fine-tuning mechanisms (new adapter weights versus LoRA), but this is an experimental validity concern, not circularity: Eq. (2) does not define the M-MULTI advantage into existence, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper itself flags the subjective evaluation's limited participants (Section 7: "due to the limited number of participants, the subjective evaluation requires further validation"), which is an honest limitation rather than a circular step. Self-citations appear (e.g., TeaserGen [15], DITTO [34,35], Audio Prompt Adapter [47], Presto [70], EMOPIA [60]), but none is the load-bearing justification for the main result; the main evidence is the held-out evaluation table and external metric definitions. No specific reduction of a prediction to its own inputs or to a self-citation chain is exhibited, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions about pre-trained models and dataset construction thresholds. No free parameters are fitted to the evaluation sets; the listed thresholds are tuning choices in the data pipeline. No new physical or conceptual entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Event detection threshold for musical segments = 0.3 average probability
    Used to retain clips where the average probability of containing a musical event exceeds 0.3; the paper states this threshold is determined empirically by testing different values across multiple samples (Section 3.1).
  • Silence detection threshold scaling factor = 0.2
    Used with pyAudioAnalysis silence detection; no sensitivity analysis is provided and the value appears to be a tool default rather than an optimized parameter (Section 3.1).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Pretrained source separation model [56] accurately decomposes movie audio into music, effect, and dialogue.
    Dataset construction relies on this decomposition to identify musical segments; errors could lead to mislabeled clips, though event detection and manual verification partially mitigate this.
  • domain assumption Chroma similarity correctly identifies the matching soundtrack for each clip.
    The paper validates chroma matching on 20 clips (85% success) and then uses it across the full dataset with manual verification; the automatic mapping is still assumed to generalize.
  • domain assumption Frozen ViViT video embeddings contain information relevant for music generation conditioning.
    The adapter uses a pre-trained ViViT encoder without fine-tuning or analyzing what visual features are captured; the paper assumes these embeddings provide useful conditioning signal.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Video-Guided Text-to-Music Generation Using Public Domain Movie Collections." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YCGRR6Z2

@misc{pith2026250612573,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Video-Guided Text-to-Music Generation Using Public Domain Movie Collections},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YCGRR6Z2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12573}
}
read the original abstract

Despite recent advancements in music generation systems, their application in film production remains limited, as they struggle to capture the nuances of real-world filmmaking, where filmmakers consider multiple factors-such as visual content, dialogue, and emotional tone-when selecting or composing music for a scene. This limitation primarily stems from the absence of comprehensive datasets that integrate these elements. To address this gap, we introduce Open Screen Soundtrack Library (OSSL), a dataset consisting of movie clips from public domain films, totaling approximately 36.5 hours, paired with high-quality soundtracks and human-annotated mood information. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our dataset in improving the performance of pre-trained models on film music generation tasks, we introduce a new video adapter that enhances an autoregressive transformer-based text-to-music model by adding video-based conditioning. Our experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach effectively enhances MusicGen-Medium in terms of both objective measures of distributional and paired fidelity, and subjective compatibility in mood and genre. To facilitate reproducibility and foster future work, we publicly release the dataset, code, and demo.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Video-Guided Text-to-Music Generation Using Public Domain Movie Collections

    INTRODUCTION Music plays a crucial role in films, shaping its artistic qual- ity and influencing its commercial success [1]. A well- composed soundtrack enhances the emotional depth of a scene, guiding audience perception and engagement [2–5]. Despite recent advancements in music generation systems, significant challenges remain in adapting these technolo...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    RELATED WORK Audio-Domain Music Generation.Contemporary mu- sic generation architectures in the audio domain predom- inantly follow two distinct paradigms. The first employs neural codecs to transform digital audio signals into discrete tokens, enabling transformer-based models [17] to gener- ate music by learning token distributions from prompts such as ...

    2025

  3. [3]

    We provide an overview of the comparison of video-music datasets in Table 1 and an illustration of our dataset con- struction methodology in Figure 1

    DATASET CONSTRUCTION 3.1 Open Screen Soundtrack Library (OSSL) We introduce the Open Screen Soundtrack Library (OSSL), a collection of movie clips with their corresponding sound- tracks and associated metadata, including mood annotations. We provide an overview of the comparison of video-music datasets in Table 1 and an illustration of our dataset con- st...

  4. [4]

    MODEL ARCHITECTURE In this section, we present our methodology for integrating a video adapter into an existing text-to-music generation model, MusicGen [16], along with its illustration in Fig- ure 3. MusicGen [16] is an autoregressive transformer [17]- based model that generates discrete tokens which are subse- quently converted into audio signals by a ...

  5. [5]

    S” and “M

    EXPERIMENTAL SETTING 5.1 Comparison Models We fine-tune MusicGen-Small and MusicGen-Medium with video adapters, 5 as described in the previous section. Here, S-MULTIand M-MULTIdenote these models, where “S” and “M” stand for “Small” and “Medium,” respectively. As baselines, we use the original MusicGen-Small and MusicGen-Medium models, which generate resu...

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Distributional FidelityOur evaluation on OES-Com re- veals that fine-tuning on OSSL enhances distributional fi- delity

    RESULTS AND ANALYSIS We present our comprehensive evaluation results in Table 3. Distributional FidelityOur evaluation on OES-Com re- veals that fine-tuning on OSSL enhances distributional fi- delity. Specifically, S-TEXTand S-MULTIachieve lower FAD scores compared to S-BASEwhile M-TEXTand M- MULTIexhibit higher Precision scores relative to M-BASE, indica...

  7. [7]

    To show the effectiveness of our dataset, we adapted a text-to-music generation model with video conditions and fine-tuned it on our dataset

    CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK In this paper, we introduced the Open Screen Soundtrack Library (OSSL), a dataset comprising movie clips, corre- sponding soundtracks, and mood annotations. To show the effectiveness of our dataset, we adapted a text-to-music generation model with video conditions and fine-tuned it on our dataset. We conducted evaluations both o...

    work page

  8. [8]

    ETHICS STATEMENT Our research adheres to ethical principles by ensuring that the construction of Open Screen Soundtrack Library (OSSL) and training methodologies are based solely on copyright-free materials. By publicly releasing our dataset, we aim to promote ethical research practices and encourage the broader community to utilize copyright-free data fo...

    work page

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Soundtrack design: The impact of music on visual attention and affective responses,

    B. Millet, J. Chattah, and S. Ahn, “Soundtrack design: The impact of music on visual attention and affective responses,”Applied ergonomics, vol. 93, p. 103301, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Multimodal deep models for predicting affective responses evoked by movies

    H. T. P. Thao, D. Herremans, and G. Roig, “Multimodal deep models for predicting affective responses evoked by movies.” inICCV Workshops, 2019, pp. 1618–1627

    2019

  3. [11]

    Emotion embedding spaces for matching mu- sic to stories,

    M. Won, J. Salamon, N. J. Bryan, G. J. Mysore, and X. Serra, “Emotion embedding spaces for matching mu- sic to stories,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13468, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Attendaffectnet–emotion prediction of movie viewers using multimodal fusion with self-attention,

    H. T. P. Thao, B. Balamurali, G. Roig, and D. Herre- mans, “Attendaffectnet–emotion prediction of movie viewers using multimodal fusion with self-attention,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 24, p. 8356, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Predicting emotion from music videos: ex- ploring the relative contribution of visual and audi- tory information to affective responses,

    P. Chua, D. Makris, D. Herremans, G. Roig, and K. Agres, “Predicting emotion from music videos: ex- ploring the relative contribution of visual and audi- tory information to affective responses,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.10453, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Analysis of the roles of film soundtracks in films,

    K. Xu, “Analysis of the roles of film soundtracks in films,” in2022 International Conference on Compre- hensive Art and Cultural Communication (CACC 2022). Atlantis Press, 2022, pp. 351–355

    2022

  7. [15]

    Actions in context,

    M. Marszalek, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid, “Actions in context,” in2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2009, pp. 2929–2936

    2009

  8. [16]

    Movieqa: Understanding stories in movies through question-answering,

    M. Tapaswi, Y . Zhu, R. Stiefelhagen, A. Torralba, R. Ur- tasun, and S. Fidler, “Movieqa: Understanding stories in movies through question-answering,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 4631–4640

    2016

  9. [17]

    Movienet: A holistic dataset for movie understand- ing,

    Q. Huang, Y . Xiong, A. Rao, J. Wang, and D. Lin, “Movienet: A holistic dataset for movie understand- ing,” inComputer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Pro- ceedings, Part IV 16. Springer, 2020, pp. 709–727

    2020

  10. [18]

    Mad: A scalable dataset for language grounding in videos from movie audio descriptions,

    M. Soldan, A. Pardo, J. L. Alcázar, F. Caba, C. Zhao, S. Giancola, and B. Ghanem, “Mad: A scalable dataset for language grounding in videos from movie audio descriptions,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 5026–5035

    2022

  11. [19]

    A dataset for movie description,

    A. Rohrbach, M. Rohrbach, N. Tandon, and B. Schiele, “A dataset for movie description,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2015, pp. 3202–3212

    2015

  12. [20]

    Moviegraphs: Towards understanding human-centric situations from videos,

    P. Vicol, M. Tapaswi, L. Castrejon, and S. Fidler, “Moviegraphs: Towards understanding human-centric situations from videos,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 8581–8590

    2018

  13. [21]

    Hlvu: A new challenge to test deep understanding of movies the way humans do,

    K. Curtis, G. Awad, S. Rajput, and I. Soboroff, “Hlvu: A new challenge to test deep understanding of movies the way humans do,” inProceedings of the 2020 Inter- national Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, 2020, pp. 355–361

    2020

  14. [22]

    Condensed movies: Story based retrieval with contex- tual embeddings,

    M. Bain, A. Nagrani, A. Brown, and A. Zisserman, “Condensed movies: Story based retrieval with contex- tual embeddings,” inProceedings of the Asian Confer- ence on Computer Vision, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Teasergen: Generating teasers for long documentaries,

    W. Xu, P. P. Liang, H. Kim, J. McAuley, T. Berg- Kirkpatrick, and H.-W. Dong, “Teasergen: Generating teasers for long documentaries,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05586

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Simple and control- lable music generation,

    J. Copet, F. Kreuk, I. Gat, T. Remez, D. Kant, G. Syn- naeve, Y . Adi, and A. Défossez, “Simple and control- lable music generation,”Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, vol. 36, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, “Attention is all you need,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Musiclm: Generat- ing music from text,

    A. Agostinelli, T. I. Denk, Z. Borsos, J. Engel, M. Verzetti, A. Caillon, Q. Huang, A. Jansen, A. Roberts, M. Tagliasacchiet al., “Musiclm: Generat- ing music from text,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11325, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Musicongen: Rhythm and chord control for transformer-based text-to-music generation,

    Y .-H. Lan, W.-Y . Hsiao, H.-C. Cheng, and Y .-H. Yang, “Musicongen: Rhythm and chord control for transformer-based text-to-music generation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15060, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Vidmuse: A simple video-to- music generation framework with long-short-term mod- eling,

    Z. Tian, Z. Liu, R. Yuan, J. Pan, Q. Liu, X. Tan, Q. Chen, W. Xue, and Y . Guo, “Vidmuse: A simple video-to- music generation framework with long-short-term mod- eling,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04321, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    V2meow: Meowing to the visual beat via video-to- music generation,

    K. Su, J. Y . Li, Q. Huang, D. Kuzmin, J. Lee, C. Don- ahue, F. Sha, A. Jansen, Y . Wang, M. Verzettiet al., “V2meow: Meowing to the visual beat via video-to- music generation,” inProceedings of the AAAI Confer- ence on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 5, 2024, pp. 4952–4960

    2024

  22. [30]

    Gvmgen: A general video-to-music generation model with hierarchical attentions,

    H. Zuo, W. You, J. Wu, S. Ren, P. Chen, M. Zhou, Y . Lu, and L. Sun, “Gvmgen: A general video-to-music generation model with hierarchical attentions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09972, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Riffusion-stable diffusion for real-time music generation,

    S. Forsgren and H. Martiros, “Riffusion-stable diffusion for real-time music generation,”URL https://riffusion. com, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Noise2music: Text-conditioned music generation with diffusion models,

    Q. Huang, D. S. Park, T. Wang, T. I. Denk, A. Ly, N. Chen, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Yu, C. Franket al., “Noise2music: Text-conditioned music generation with diffusion models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03917, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Mo\ˆ usai: Text-to-music generation with long-context latent diffusion,

    F. Schneider, O. Kamal, Z. Jin, and B. Schölkopf, “Mo\ˆ usai: Text-to-music generation with long-context latent diffusion,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11757, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Efficient neu- ral music generation,

    M. W. Lam, Q. Tian, T. Li, Z. Yin, S. Feng, M. Tu, Y . Ji, R. Xia, M. Ma, X. Songet al., “Efficient neu- ral music generation,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 17 450–17 463, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Mustango: Toward controllable text-to-music generation,

    J. Melechovsky, Z. Guo, D. Ghosal, N. Majumder, D. Herremans, and S. Poria, “Mustango: Toward controllable text-to-music generation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08355, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Multi-track musicldm: Towards versatile music generation with latent diffusion model,

    T. Karchkhadze, M. R. Izadi, K. Chen, G. Assayag, and S. Dubnov, “Multi-track musicldm: Towards versatile music generation with latent diffusion model,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02845, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Stable audio open,

    Z. Evans, J. D. Parker, C. Carr, Z. Zukowski, J. Tay- lor, and J. Pons, “Stable audio open,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14358, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Vmas: Video-to-music generation via se- mantic alignment in web music videos,

    Y .-B. Lin, Y . Tian, L. Yang, G. Bertasius, and H. Wang, “Vmas: Video-to-music generation via se- mantic alignment in web music videos,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07450, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Muvi: Video-to-music generation with semantic align- ment and rhythmic synchronization,

    R. Li, S. Zheng, X. Cheng, Z. Zhang, S. Ji, and Z. Zhao, “Muvi: Video-to-music generation with semantic align- ment and rhythmic synchronization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12957, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Joint audio and symbolic conditioning for temporally controlled text-to-music generation,

    O. Tal, A. Ziv, I. Gat, F. Kreuk, and Y . Adi, “Joint audio and symbolic conditioning for temporally controlled text-to-music generation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10970, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Music controlnet: Multiple time-varying controls for music generation,

    S.-L. Wu, C. Donahue, S. Watanabe, and N. J. Bryan, “Music controlnet: Multiple time-varying controls for music generation,” 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    DITTO: Diffusion inference-time t- optimization for music generation,

    Z. Novack, J. McAuley, T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, and N. J. Bryan, “DITTO: Diffusion inference-time t- optimization for music generation,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    DITTO-2: Distilled diffusion inference-time t-optimization for music generation,

    ——, “DITTO-2: Distilled diffusion inference-time t-optimization for music generation,” inInternational Society of Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Mumu-llama: Multi-modal music understanding and generation via large language models,

    S. Liu, A. S. Hussain, Q. Wu, C. Sun, and Y . Shan, “Mumu-llama: Multi-modal music understanding and generation via large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06660, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Multimodal music generation with explicit bridges and retrieval aug- mentation,

    B. Wang, L. Zhuo, Z. Wang, C. Bao, W. Chengjing, X. Nie, J. Dai, J. Han, Y . Liao, and S. Liu, “Multimodal music generation with explicit bridges and retrieval aug- mentation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09428, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Foley music: Learning to generate music from videos,

    C. Gan, D. Huang, P. Chen, J. B. Tenenbaum, and A. Torralba, “Foley music: Learning to generate music from videos,” inComputer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XI 16. Springer, 2020, pp. 758–775

    2020

  39. [47]

    Video background music generation with controllable music transformer,

    S. Di, Z. Jiang, S. Liu, Z. Wang, L. Zhu, Z. He, H. Liu, and S. Yan, “Video background music generation with controllable music transformer,” inProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2021, pp. 2037–2045

    2021

  40. [49]

    Vivit: A video vision transformer,

    A. Arnab, M. Dehghani, G. Heigold, C. Sun, M. Luˇci´c, and C. Schmid, “Vivit: A video vision transformer,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 6836–6846

    2021

  41. [50]

    Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp,

    N. Houlsby, A. Giurgiu, S. Jastrzebski, B. Morrone, Q. De Laroussilhe, A. Gesmundo, M. Attariyan, and S. Gelly, “Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2019, pp. 2790–2799

    2019

  42. [51]

    Adapterfusion: Non-destructive task composition for transfer learning,

    J. Pfeiffer, A. Kamath, A. Rücklé, K. Cho, and I. Gurevych, “Adapterfusion: Non-destructive task composition for transfer learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00247, 2020

    2005 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Adapterhub: A framework for adapting transformers,

    J. Pfeiffer, A. Rücklé, C. Poth, A. Kamath, I. Vuli ´c, S. Ruder, K. Cho, and I. Gurevych, “Adapterhub: A framework for adapting transformers,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.07779, 2020

    2007 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models,

    H. Ye, J. Zhang, S. Liu, X. Han, and W. Yang, “Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  45. [54]

    T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models,

    C. Mou, X. Wang, L. Xie, Y . Wu, J. Zhang, Z. Qi, and Y . Shan, “T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 5, 2024, pp. 4296– 4304

    2024

  46. [55]

    Audio prompt adapter: Unleashing music editing abilities for text- to-music with lightweight finetuning,

    F.-D. Tsai, S.-L. Wu, H. Kim, B.-Y . Chen, H.-C. Cheng, and Y .-H. Yang, “Audio prompt adapter: Unleashing music editing abilities for text- to-music with lightweight finetuning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16564, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Content- based video-music retrieval using soft intra-modal structure constraint,

    S. Hong, W. Im, and H. S. Yang, “Content- based video-music retrieval using soft intra-modal structure constraint,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/1704.06761

    2017 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Creating a multitrack classical music performance dataset for multimodal music analysis: Challenges, insights, and applications,

    B. Li, X. Liu, K. Dinesh, Z. Duan, and G. Sharma, “Creating a multitrack classical music performance dataset for multimodal music analysis: Challenges, insights, and applications,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 522–535, Feb. 2019. [Online]. Available: http...

    2019

  49. [58]

    Quantized gan for complex music generation from dance videos,

    Y . Zhu, K. Olszewski, Y . Wu, P. Achlioptas, M. Chai, Y . Yan, and S. Tulyakov, “Quantized gan for complex music generation from dance videos,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.00604

    2022 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Ai choreographer: Music conditioned 3d dance generation with aist++,

    R. Li, S. Yang, D. A. Ross, and A. Kanazawa, “Ai choreographer: Music conditioned 3d dance generation with aist++,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08779

    2021 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Video back- ground music generation: Dataset, method and evalu- ation,

    L. Zhuo, Z. Wang, B. Wang, Y . Liao, C. Bao, S. Peng, S. Han, A. Zhang, F. Fang, and S. Liu, “Video back- ground music generation: Dataset, method and evalu- ation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 15 637– 15 647

    2023

  52. [61]

    Video2music: Suitable music generation from videos using an affective multimodal transformer model,

    J. Kang, S. Poria, and D. Herremans, “Video2music: Suitable music generation from videos using an affective multimodal transformer model,”Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 249, p. 123640, Sep

  53. [62]

    The kinetics human action video dataset,

    W. Kay, J. Carreira, K. Simonyan, B. Zhang, C. Hillier, S. Vijayanarasimhan, F. Viola, T. Green, T. Back, P. Natsev, M. Suleyman, and A. Zisserman, “The kinetics human action video dataset,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.06950

    2017 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Diff- bgm: A diffusion model for video background music generation,

    S. Li, Y . Qin, M. Zheng, X. Jin, and Y . Liu, “Diff- bgm: A diffusion model for video background music generation,” 2024

    2024

  55. [64]

    The nes video-music database: A dataset of symbolic video game music paired with gameplay videos,

    I. Cardoso, R. O. Moraes, and L. N. Ferreira, “The nes video-music database: A dataset of symbolic video game music paired with gameplay videos,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, ser. FDG

  56. [65]

    ACM, May 2024, p. 1–6. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3649921.3650011

    2024

  57. [66]

    Benchmarks and leaderboards for sound demixing tasks,

    R. Solovyev, A. Stempkovskiy, and T. Habruseva, “Benchmarks and leaderboards for sound demixing tasks,” 2023

    2023

  58. [67]

    pyaudioanalysis: An open-source python library for audio signal analysis,

    T. Giannakopoulos, “pyaudioanalysis: An open-source python library for audio signal analysis,”PloS one, vol. 10, no. 12, p. e0144610, 2015

    2015

  59. [68]

    Panns: Large-scale pretrained audio neural networks for audio pattern recognition,

    Q. Kong, Y . Cao, T. Iqbal, Y . Wang, W. Wang, and M. D. Plumbley, “Panns: Large-scale pretrained audio neural networks for audio pattern recognition,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Process- ing, vol. 28, pp. 2880–2894, 2020

    2020

  60. [69]

    A circumplex model of affect

    J. A. Russell, “A circumplex model of affect.”Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 39, no. 6, p. 1161, 1980

    1980

  61. [70]

    Emopia: A multi-modal pop piano dataset for emotion recognition and emotion-based music gen- eration,

    H.-T. Hung, J. Ching, S. Doh, N. Kim, J. Nam, and Y .-H. Yang, “Emopia: A multi-modal pop piano dataset for emotion recognition and emotion-based music gen- eration,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01374, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  62. [71]

    High fidelity neural audio compression,

    A. Défossez, J. Copet, G. Synnaeve, and Y . Adi, “High fidelity neural audio compression,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.13438, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,

    Y . Wu, K. Chen, T. Zhang, Y . Hui, T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, and S. Dubnov, “Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,” inICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Pro- cessing...

    2023

  64. [73]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models,

    E. J. Hu, Y . Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y . Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, and W. Chen, “Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Language models are few-shot learners,

    T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Ka- plan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sas- try, A. Askellet al., “Language models are few-shot learners,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020

    1901

  66. [75]

    Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models,

    V . Liu and L. B. Chilton, “Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models,” inPro- ceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2022, pp. 1–23

    2022

  67. [76]

    A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt,

    J. White, Q. Fu, S. Hays, M. Sandborn, C. Olea, H. Gilbert, A. Elnashar, J. Spencer-Smith, and D. C. Schmidt, “A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11382, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Lp-musiccaps: Llm-based pseudo music captioning,

    S. Doh, K. Choi, J. Lee, and J. Nam, “Lp-musiccaps: Llm-based pseudo music captioning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16372, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Decoupled weight decay regu- larization,

    F. H. Ilya Loshchilov, “Decoupled weight decay regu- larization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Sgdr: Stochastic gra- dient descent with warm restarts,

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, “Sgdr: Stochastic gra- dient descent with warm restarts,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Presto! distilling steps and layers for accelerating music generation

    Z. Novack, G. Zhu, J. Casebeer, J. McAuley, T. Berg- Kirkpatrick, and N. J. Bryan, “Presto! distilling steps and layers for accelerating music generation.” inIn- ternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025

    2025

  72. [81]

    Diff-a-riff: Musical accompaniment co- creation via latent diffusion models,

    J. Nistal, M. Pasini, C. Aouameur, M. Grachten, and S. Lattner, “Diff-a-riff: Musical accompaniment co- creation via latent diffusion models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08384, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  73. [83]

    Fr \’echet audio distance: A metric for evaluat- ing music enhancement algorithms,

    K. Kilgour, M. Zuluaga, D. Roblek, and M. Shar- ifi, “Fr \’echet audio distance: A metric for evaluat- ing music enhancement algorithms,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08466, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  74. [84]

    Reliable fidelity and diversity metrics for generative models,

    M. F. Naeem, S. J. Oh, Y . Uh, Y . Choi, and J. Yoo, “Reliable fidelity and diversity metrics for generative models,” 2020

    2020

  75. [85]

    Efficient training of audio transformers with patchout,

    K. Koutini, J. Schlüter, H. Eghbal-Zadeh, and G. Wid- mer, “Efficient training of audio transformers with patchout,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05069, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  76. [2024]

    Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j

    [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eswa.2024.123640

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.