Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Dynamically Encircled Higher-order Exceptional Points in an Optical Fiber

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a purpose-built triple-core optical fiber with spatially varying gain and loss can host two interconnected second-order exceptional points that together behave as a third-order exceptional point.

desk verdict A solid fiber-design simulation, but the EP3 claim is unsupported; the near-loop nonchiral result is the real news. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14874 v1 pith:YDODZVOP submitted 2024-11-22 physics.optics

Arpan Roy , Arnab Laha , Abhijit Biswas , Adam Miranowicz , Bishnu P. Pal , Somnath Ghosh This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords exceptionalpointthird-ordernon-Hermitianphotonicsmodeconversionopticalfibergain-lossengineeringtopologicalencirclementbeampropagationmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a purpose-built triple-core optical fiber with spatially varying gain and loss can host two interconnected second-order exceptional points (EP2s) that together behave as a third-order exceptional point (EP3). It argues that a single propagation pass through the fiber, during which the gain-loss parameters trace a loop around or near these exceptional points, produces asymmetric mode conversion: light entering in any of the three supported modes exits in a dominant mode that depends on propagation direction (chiral) or is the same in both directions (nonchiral). The authors further claim that the same conversion dynamics persist for parametric loops that pass close to the exceptional points without enclosing them, which would relax fabrication constraints. If the paper is right, this provides a fiber-based platform for higher-order mode converters, isolators, and circulators that exploit exceptional-point topology without complex parameterization.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the two second-order exceptional points EP2(0,1) and EP2(0,2) located at $(\gamma,\tau) = (1.1\times10^{-3},1)$ and $(3.6\times10^{-3},2.008)$ in the gain-loss parameter plane, both involving the fundamental mode $\Psi_0$; their interconnection is the claimed genesis of an EP3. The dynamical mechanism is the mapping of a parametric loop in the $(\gamma,\tau)$ plane onto the propagation direction $z$ through $\gamma(z) = \gamma_0\sin(\pi z/L)$ and $\tau(z) = \tau_0 + r\sin(2\pi z/L)$, so that one full pass through the fiber equals one full encirclement. Nonadiabatic corrections are estimated from the relative gain factors $\Delta\Gamma_{m,n}$, defined by the difference between each mode's averaged imaginary effective index $\Gamma_{\mathrm{av}}$ over the loop; the signs of these factors decide which mode wins at the output and whether the conversion is chiral or nonchiral.

What would settle it

Compute the three complex effective indices of the fiber on a fine grid of $(\gamma,\tau)$ around the two claimed coalescence points and check whether all three eigenvalues converge to a single point, with the characteristic polynomial's discriminant vanishing to third order, at some parameter value; if the two EP2s remain distinct branch points that never meet, the EP3 label and the third-order topological interpretation are falsified even if the simulated mode-conversion outputs still match.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a three-core fiber segment, operating at 1.55 µm with core index 1.46 and cladding 1.45, supports three quasi-guided modes whose effective indices coalesce in pairs at two exceptional points, EP2(0,1) and EP2(0,2), when the gain-loss coefficient $\gamma$ and loss-to-gain ratio $\tau$ are tuned. Because both EP2s involve the fundamental mode $\Psi_0$, the authors argue they are interconnected and together form an EP3 whose third-order branch-point topology is revealed by quasistatic encirclement along Loop-3, which permutes effective indices as $\Psi_0 \to \Psi_2 \to \Psi_1 \to \Psi_0$ (clockwise) or $\Psi_0 \to \Psi_1 \to \Psi_2 \to \Psi_0$ (counterclockwise). Dynamically, by mapping the loop onto the propagation axis, a single pass along the fiber realizes the encirclement; simulations show chiral conversion for loops enclosing only EP2(0,1), and nonchiral conversion for loops enclosing EP2(0,2), both EP2s, or passing near them without enclosing. The paper claims that whether the dynamics are chiral or nonchiral is governed by the relative gain factors $\Delta\Gamma_{m,n}$, which determine which nonadiabatic transitions dominate, and that the EP-induced conversion persists for a smaller loop (Loop-5) that does not enclose either EP2, as long as the relative-gain relations mirror those of the encircling loop.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that two second-order exceptional points that share one mode necessarily merge into a single third-order exceptional point when both are encircled; the paper infers this interconnection but never shows all three modes collapsing at one parameter value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single 35 mm propagation pass through the fiber realizes one full loop in parameter space, with forward propagation corresponding to clockwise encirclement and backward propagation to counterclockwise encirclement.
  • When the loop encloses only EP2(0,1), the two modes connected by that point are converted into one dominant mode whose identity depends on the propagation direction, while the third mode remains unchanged; enlarging the loop (Loop-4) draws the third mode into the conversion, making the dynamics fully chiral.
  • Loops that enclose EP2(0,2), both EP2s (Loop-3), or merely pass near both without enclosing them (Loop-5) all yield nonchiral conversion, with every input mode ending in $\Psi_0$ regardless of direction.
  • The nonchiral conversion persists as the loop shrinks from $r=0.9$ down to $r=0.2$, demonstrating that EP-induced mode conversion does not require the loop to physically enclose the exceptional points.
  • Because only two tunable parameters ($\gamma$ and $\tau$) and a single fiber segment are needed, the scheme avoids the complex multi-parameter geometries previously used for higher-order exceptional-point devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not directly show three eigenvalues and eigenvectors coalescing at a single parameter point; a direct calculation of the full three-mode effective Hamiltonian's discriminant would settle whether the two EP2s genuinely form an EP3 or remain two independent branch points that the Loop-3 output merely traverses in sequence.
  • If the persistence claim generalizes, then 'encirclement' could be replaced by 'approach' in other non-Hermitian systems, letting engineers place the loop wherever the relative-gain sign pattern matches the encircling case, which would shorten devices and reduce absorbed power.
  • The relative-gain criteria $\Delta\Gamma_{m,n}$ are presented as an interpretive rule rather than derived from the mode-coupling equations, so a natural extension is to derive these sign rules from the fiber's coupling coefficients and test them against beam-propagation outputs across a wider family of loops.
  • Simulating the same fiber geometry with a different loop shape (for example a circle in the $(\gamma,\tau)$ plane) would test whether the nonchiral outcome is generic or an artifact of the particular sinusoidal mapping in Eq. (3).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a triple-core optical fiber with a tailored gain-loss profile and uses FEM/BPM simulations to identify two exceptional points in the (γ, τ) plane: EP2(0,1) at (1.1×10^-3, 1) between Ψ0 and Ψ1, and EP2(0,2) at (3.6×10^-3, 2.008) between Ψ0 and Ψ2. It then studies adiabatic eigenvalue permutations and dynamical beam propagation along several loops: Loop-1 and Loop-4 around EP2(0,1), Loop-2 around EP2(0,2), Loop-3 around both, and Loop-5 near both but enclosing neither. The main claims are chiral asymmetric mode conversion for loops enclosing an EP2, nonchiral conversion to Ψ0 for Loop-2, Loop-3, and Loop-5, and persistence of EP-induced dynamics without enclosing the EPs. The interpretation of the dynamical results is built on the sign of a relative-gain factor ΔΓ through Eq. (4).

Significance. If the EP3 claim were directly supported, the paper would offer a simple all-fiber platform for higher-order exceptional-point dynamics and mode conversion with only two tunable parameters. The manuscript's strengths include explicit fiber parameters, systematic FEM/BPM simulations, several loop geometries with concrete parameter values, and falsifiable beam-propagation predictions. The Loop-5 result—nonchiral mode conversion without encirclement—is potentially interesting independently of the EP3 label. However, the central EP3 identification currently rests on two separate EP2s rather than on a demonstrated triple coalescence, and Eq. (4) is asserted rather than derived or independently validated. These two issues are load-bearing for the paper's main novelty, so the manuscript needs substantial rework or re-scoping.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II B, Fig. 2; also Abstract and Conclusions] The paper identifies EP2(0,1) at (γ, τ) = (1.1×10^-3, 1) and EP2(0,2) at (3.6×10^-3, 2.008), both involving Ψ0, and then concludes that 'such an interaction scheme indicates the emergence of an EP3.' This inference is not demonstrated. An EP3 is a single parameter point at which three eigenvalues and their eigenvectors coalesce, and the manuscript provides no eigenvalue scan, no grid search, and no eigenvector-overlap analysis showing such a point. In a generic 3×3 non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, an EP3 is a codimension-4 phenomenon in real parameter space and does not follow from two EP2s at disjoint parameter points. The 3-cycle permutation in Fig. 3(d) is exactly the monodromy expected when a loop encloses two separate branch points (a composition of two pairwise transpositions), so it cannot by itself certify a third-order branch point. The authors should either (i) provide direct evidence of triple coalescence at a single point—for example, show that the cubic eigenvalue equation reduces to (λ − λ_EP)^3 and that all three eigenvectors become parallel—or (ii) consistently re-label the object as an 'analogous EP3' or 'EP3-type topological behavior' throughout the title, abstract, and conclusions. As written, the abstract's claim of a 'third-order exceptional point (EP3), formed by two interconnected second-order exceptional points' is not supported by the presented data.
  2. [Eq. (4), Section II C] The nonadiabatic-correction relation N_{m→n} ∝ −exp[∫ ΔΓ_{m,n} dz] is stated without derivation and is then used in Sections II D and II E to explain every output channel (for example, 'ΔΓ_{0,1} < 0 ... allows the mode conversions {Ψ0, Ψ1} → Ψ0'). Because the coefficient is given only up to an unspecified proportionality and the sign convention for ΔΓ is defined verbally rather than derived, the explanations are post hoc. The principal dynamical predictions come from BPM simulations and are not independently checked against an equation-based model. Please derive Eq. (4) from the coupled-mode equations in the instantaneous eigenbasis, or alternatively treat it as a phenomenological summary and validate it quantitatively against at least one BPM case by predicting output mode fractions for, say, Loop-1 and comparing with Fig. 4(c). Without such support, the claimed mechanism is not load-bearing.
  3. [Section II E, Loop-5 threshold] The persistence claim—that asymmetric mode conversion survives near, but not enclosing, the EPs—is supported only by the single Loop-5 case. The statement that below r = 0.2 'asymmetric conversions are no longer observed' is asserted without showing the r-dependence. Since the practical-feasibility conclusion (minimized accumulated gain and gain-loss contrast) depends on this threshold, please provide the output mode fractions or at least the ΔΓ sign pattern as a function of r (or of γ0 or τ0) between r = 0.2 and r = 0.9, and specify the numerical criterion used to define 'no asymmetric conversion.'
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II A, after Eq. (1)] The sentence says the two outer cores are 'denoted as nL for the left core and nL for the right core'; the second symbol should be nR.
  2. [Section II B and Section II D] Section II B refers to 'neff-values associated with Ψ_j (j = 0, 2, 3)', which should be j = 0, 1, 2; Section II D similarly refers to 'Ψ3 remains unaffected' where Ψ2 is meant.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption lists '(c) along Loop-2' and then '(c) along Loop-3'; the second label should be (d), matching the in-text reference to Fig. 3(d).
  4. [Fig. 5 caption] Because the caption states that results are shown for only one of the three loops, please state explicitly in the caption which loop is displayed (Loop-2, Loop-3, or Loop-5) or show the three cases as separate panels.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract says 'we report a triple-core specialty optical fiber,' but the work is a design and simulation study; consider wording such as 'we design and simulate' to avoid implying an experimental demonstration.
  6. [Equation (4) notation] The phrase 'indices {m,n} signify the all possible transitions among Ψ_j' is grammatically incomplete, and the subscript in '∆Γ_..._n' should consistently be written as ∆Γ_{m,n}.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the fiber's mode-conversion predictions come from independent RSoft BPM simulations, while the few self-citations and the interpretive Eq. (4) do not force the claimed results. The EP3 labeling is an external-topology support question, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central dynamical claims (chiral and nonchiral mode conversions for Loops 1-5) are produced by full-wave beam-propagation simulations in RSoft, not by fitting Eq. (4). Eq. (4) is imported from Gilary et al. [34] as an interpretive formula: its relative-gain signs are computed from the FEM adiabatic eigenvalue trajectories and are not tuned to match the BPM outputs, so the subsequent BPM comparison is an independent check rather than a restatement of the inputs. The EP2 locations and the eigenvalue permutations are FEM results, and the 'EP3' identification is made by invoking the external topological analogy of two interconnected EP2s (Muller and Rotter [48]; Ryu et al. [49]), which is a cited premise rather than a paper-internal definition; the manuscript itself later uses 'analogous EP3' (Fig. 3(d) caption and Section E), indicating the label is an interpretive analogy. Whether the analogy is sufficient to establish a true third-order branch point (with triple coalescence) is a verification/correctness gap, not a circular derivation. The self-citations ([13], [22], [36], [44]-[46], [50]) are contextual background or prior implementations and are not used as the proof of the present numerical results, so no load-bearing self-citation chain exists. Overall, no prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on hand-chosen loop parameters, a specific fiber geometry, and several borrowed modeling assumptions. The most structurally fragile items are the EP3 interpretation and the nonadiabatic formula, neither of which is derived or directly verified in the paper.

free parameters (7)
  • Loop-1 parameters (γ0, τ0, r) = 1.2e-3, 1, 0.4
    Chosen by hand to encircle only EP2(0,1); the central Loop-1 dynamics depend on these values.
  • Loop-2 parameters (γ0, τ0, r) = 4.2e-3, 2.008, 0.2
    Chosen by hand to encircle only EP2(0,2).
  • Loop-3 parameters (γ0, τ0, r) = 4.2e-3, 1.4, 0.9
    Chosen by hand to encircle both EP2s and to exhibit third-order branch point permutation.
  • Loop-4 parameters (γ0, τ0, r) = 2.5e-3, 1, 0.4
    Chosen by hand as a larger loop around EP2(0,1) that brings Ψ2 into the dynamics.
  • Loop-5 parameters (γ0, τ0, r) = 4.2e-3, 1.4, 0.2
    Chosen by hand to pass near both EP2s without enclosing them; used to test persistence.
  • Fiber length L = 35 mm
    Chosen so that θ = 2π maps to z = L; all dynamic encirclement results assume this length.
  • Core diameter and separation (dco, d) = 5 μm, 6.7 μm
    Chosen so the fiber supports three quasi-guided modes; the EP locations and dynamics depend on this geometry.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A 3x3 perturbed non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with gain and loss on the outer cores describes the three quasi-guided modes.
    Introduced in Section II A following Ref [50]; no explicit matrix is given, and all subsequent EP analysis relies on this modal coupling model.
  • domain assumption Two EP2s sharing a common mode form an EP3 with third-order branch point behavior.
    Invoked in Section II B via Refs [48,49]; the paper does not directly show three eigenvalues and eigenvectors coalescing at a single parameter point.
  • ad hoc to paper Equation (4) gives the dominant nonadiabatic correction terms via sign of relative gain ΔΓ.
    Stated in Section II C without derivation; every mode-conversion outcome is then interpreted through the signs of ΔΓ, so the paper's explanatory framework depends on this formula.
  • domain assumption The average loss Γ_av computed from adiabatic Im(n_eff) trajectories determines which transitions are adiabatic or nonadiabatic.
    Used in Section II C and throughout Sections II D-E to assign signs to ΔΓ; this assumes the gain-loss contrast along the mode's trajectory is the governing quantity.
  • domain assumption BPM simulations with intensity renormalization at every z step represent the actual modal dynamics of the fiber segment.
    Stated in the Fig. 4 caption and used for all dynamic results; renormalization masks absolute loss and may hide mode-dependent attenuation in a real fiber.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamically Encircled Higher-order Exceptional Points in an Optical Fiber." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YDODZVOP

@misc{pith2026241114874,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamically Encircled Higher-order Exceptional Points in an Optical Fiber},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YDODZVOP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14874}
}
read the original abstract

The unique properties of exceptional point (EP) singularities, arising from non-Hermitian physics, have unlocked new possibilities for manipulating light-matter interactions. A tailored gain-loss variation, while encircling higher-order EPs dynamically, can significantly enhance the control of the topological flow of light in multi-level photonic systems. In particular, the integration of dynamically encircled higher-order EPs within fiber geometries holds remarkable promise for advancing specialty optical fiber applications, though a research gap remains in exploring and realizing such configurations. Here, we report a triple-core specialty optical fiber engineered with customized loss and gain to explore the topological characteristics of a third-order exceptional point (EP3), formed by two interconnected second-order exceptional points (EP2s). We elucidate chiral and nonchiral light transmission through the fiber, grounded in second- and third-order branch point behaviors and associated adiabatic and nonadiabatic modal characteristics, while considering various dynamical parametric loops to encircle the embedded EPs. We investigate the persistence of EP-induced light dynamics specifically in the parametric regions immediately adjacent to, though not encircling, the embedded EPs, potentially leading to improved device performance. Our findings offer significant implications for the design and implementation of novel light management technologies in all-fiber photonics and communications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14874 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) shows the trajectories of neff values as γ increases for a fixed τ = 1. Around γ = 1.1 × 10−3 , we observe a simultaneous coalescence in Re(neff) and a bi￾furcation in Im(neff) for the modes Ψ0 and Ψ1. Such a specific type of eigenvalue interactions refers to the pres￾ence of an EP2. Thus, we identify an EP2 between Ψ0 and Ψ1 [labeled as EP2(0,1)] at (1.1×10−3 , 1) in the (γ, τ)- plane. In this case, the neff-va… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evidence for Exceptional Points as Topological Defects

    quant-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Encircling an exceptional point once changes a transported quantum state by an order-four operator, so the exceptional point acts as a topological defect in the full Hilbert space bundle.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    For a given EP to be properly enclosed within a loop, γ0 must exceed the γ-value associated with that EP

    determine the number of EP2s that can be enclosed within the loop. For a given EP to be properly enclosed within a loop, γ0 must exceed the γ-value associated with that EP. Figure 3(a) displays the coordinates of EP2 (0,1) and EP2(0,2), along with three distinct encirclement schemes based on Eq. ( 2) within the ( γ, τ )-plane. The topological properties o...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Accordingly, we substitute θ = 2 πz/L in Eq

    along the fiber length (i.e., along z-axis). Accordingly, we substitute θ = 2 πz/L in Eq. ( 2) to map θ = {0, 2π } to z = {0, L }. This substitution leads to the dynamic parameter distri- bution: γ(x, y, z ) = γ0 sin ( πz L ) , τ(x, y, z ) = τ0 + r sin ( 2πz L ) . (3) 5 Here, γ and τ vary solely along the z-axis; they remain fixed across any cross-section i...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This would not be as straightforward for other parametric loop shapes

    allows for γ = 0 at both z = 0 and z = L, which facilitates the excitation and retrieval of passive modes in both propagation directions. This would not be as straightforward for other parametric loop shapes. To analyze EP-induced light dynamics with adiabat- ically expected mode conversions, we must account for implications of the adiabatic theorem, whic...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, Berlin, 1966)

    T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, Berlin, 1966)

    1966

  5. [5]

    The dotted lines of corresponding col- ors indicate the gain distributions in the leftmost core for each of the loops

    and ( 3)], the loss distribution in the rightmost core remains identical across all three loops, as shown by the solid black line. The dotted lines of corresponding col- ors indicate the gain distributions in the leftmost core for each of the loops. As a result, the gain-loss contrasts vary among these three loops. We begin by considering dynamical encirc...

    work page

  6. [6]

    This loop traverses the interaction regimes of both EP2(0,1) and EP2 (0,2), passing close to these points with- out enclosing either. This configuration is selected to test the recent claim of asymmetric light dynamics occurring without enclosing EP2s [ 38, 39], particularly to verify if this behavior extends to higher-order EPs. Based on the characteristi...

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Non-Hermitian optics and photonics: from classical to quantum,

    C. Wang, Z. Fu, W. Mao, J. Qie, A. D. Stone, and L. Yang, “Non-Hermitian optics and photonics: from classical to quantum,” Adv. Opt. Photon. 15, 442–523 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems,

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, “Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    The dawn of non-Hermitian optics,

    R. El-Ganainy, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and S. K. Ozdemir, “The dawn of non-Hermitian optics,” Commun. Phys. 2, 37 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Ex- ceptional points of third-order in a layered optical mi- crodisk cavity,

    J. Kullig, C.-H. Yi, M. Hentschel, and J. Wiersig, “Ex- ceptional points of third-order in a layered optical mi- crodisk cavity,” New J. Phys. 20, 083016 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    The physics of exceptional points,

    W. D. Heiss, “The physics of exceptional points,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 444016 (2012) . 9

    2012

  4. [12]

    Non-Hermitian and topo- logical photonics: optics at an exceptional point,

    M. Parto, Y. G. N. Liu, B. Bahari, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Non-Hermitian and topo- logical photonics: optics at an exceptional point,” Nanophotonics 10, 403–423 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Parity– time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,

    S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Parity– time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,” Nat. Mater. 18, 783–798 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Exceptional points in optics and photonics,

    M.-A. Miri and A. Al` u, “Exceptional points in optics and photonics,” Science 363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry,

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry,” Nat. Phys. 14, 11–19 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Dy- namically encircling exceptional points: In situ control of encircling loops and the role of the starting point,

    X.-L. Zhang, S. Wang, B. Hou, and C. T. Chan, “Dy- namically encircling exceptional points: In situ control of encircling loops and the role of the starting point,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 021066 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Dynamically crossing dia- bolic points while encircling exceptional curves: A pro- grammable symmetric-asymmetric multimode switch,

    I. I. Arkhipov, A. Miranowicz, F. Minganti, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, and F. Nori, “Dynamically crossing dia- bolic points while encircling exceptional curves: A pro- grammable symmetric-asymmetric multimode switch,” Nat. Commun. 14, 2076 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Restoring adiabatic state transfer in time-modulated non-hermitian sys- tems,

    I. I. Arkhipov, F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, i. m. c. K. ¨Ozdemir, and F. Nori, “Restoring adiabatic state transfer in time-modulated non-hermitian sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 113802 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Successive switch- ing among four states in a gain-loss-assisted optical mi- crocavity hosting exceptional points up to order four,

    A. Laha, D. Beniwal, and S. Ghosh, “Successive switch- ing among four states in a gain-loss-assisted optical mi- crocavity hosting exceptional points up to order four,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 023526 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Topological energy transfer in an op- tomechanical system with exceptional points,

    H. Xu, D. Mason, L. Jiang, and J. G. E. Harris, “Topological energy transfer in an op- tomechanical system with exceptional points,” Nature (London) 537, 80–83 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Nonadi- abatic modal dynamics around exceptional points in an all-lossy dual-mode optical waveguide: To- ward chirality-driven asymmetric mode conversion,

    A. Laha, A. Biswas, and S. Ghosh, “Nonadi- abatic modal dynamics around exceptional points in an all-lossy dual-mode optical waveguide: To- ward chirality-driven asymmetric mode conversion,” Phys. Rev. Applied 10, 054008 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Exceptional point and toward mode-selective optical isolation,

    A. Laha, S. Dey, H. K. Gandhi, A. Biswas, and S. Ghosh, “Exceptional point and toward mode-selective optical isolation,” ACS Photonics 7, 967–974 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Chiral modes and directional lasing at exceptional points,

    B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, M. Liertzer, W. Chen, J. Kramer, H. Yılmaz, J. Wier- sig, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, “Chiral modes and directional lasing at exceptional points,” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6845–6850 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Coherent perfect absorption at an exceptional point,

    C. Wang, W. R. Sweeney, A. D. Stone, and L. Yang, “Coherent perfect absorption at an exceptional point,” Science 373, 1261–1265 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Light stops at exceptional points,

    T. Goldzak, A. A. Mailybaev, and N. Moi- seyev, “Light stops at exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 013901 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Exceptional refrigeration of mo- tions beyond their mass and temperature limitations,

    D.-G. Lai, C.-H. Wang, B.-P. Hou, A. Miranow- icz, and F. Nori, “Exceptional refrigeration of mo- tions beyond their mass and temperature limitations,” Optica 11, 485–491 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Extremely broadband, on-chip optical nonreciprocity enabled by mimicking nonlinear anti- adiabatic quantum jumps near exceptional points,

    Y. Choi, C. Hahn, J. W. Yoon, S. H. Song, and P. Berini, “Extremely broadband, on-chip optical nonreciprocity enabled by mimicking nonlinear anti- adiabatic quantum jumps near exceptional points,” Nat. Commun. 8, 14154 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps,

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, and F. Nori, “Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 062131 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Nonrecip- rocal topological phonon transfer independent of both device mass and exceptional-point encircling direction,

    D.-G. Lai, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, “Nonrecip- rocal topological phonon transfer independent of both device mass and exceptional-point encircling direction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 243602 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory,

    J. Wiersig, “Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 033809 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Review of exceptional point-based sensors,

    J. Wiersig, “Review of exceptional point-based sensors,” Photon. Res. 8, 1457–1467 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points,

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, “Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points,” Nature (London) 548, 187–191 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Exceptional points enhance sensing in an opti- cal microcavity,

    W. Chen, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, “Exceptional points enhance sensing in an opti- cal microcavity,” Nature (London) 548, 192–196 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Time- asymmetric quantum-state-exchange mechanism,

    I. Gilary, A. A. Mailybaev, and N. Moiseyev, “Time- asymmetric quantum-state-exchange mechanism,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 010102 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Hybrid-liouvillian formalism connecting exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians and liouvillians via postselection of quantum tra- jectories,

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany, I. I. Arkhipov, and F. Nori, “Hybrid-liouvillian formalism connecting exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians and liouvillians via postselection of quantum tra- jectories,” Phys. Rev. A 101, 062112 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Furthermore, recent reports have ques- tioned whether it is essential to encircle an EP2 within a parametric loop to achieve asymmetric light dynamics [ 38, 39]

    and experimentally validated in a microwave waveg- uide system [ 37]. Furthermore, recent reports have ques- tioned whether it is essential to encircle an EP2 within a parametric loop to achieve asymmetric light dynamics [ 38, 39]. The findings suggest that similar asymmetric b...

  29. [37]

    Quantum state tomography across the exceptional point in a single dissipative qubit,

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, “Quantum state tomography across the exceptional point in a single dissipative qubit,” Nat. Phys. 15, 1232–1236 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Enhancement of quantum heat engine by encircling a liouvillian excep- tional point,

    J.-T. Bu, J.-Q. Zhang, G.-Y. Ding, J.-C. Li, J.-W. Zhang, B. Wang, W.-Q. Ding, W.-F. Yuan, L. Chen, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, F. Zhou, H. Jing, and M. Feng, “Enhancement of quantum heat engine by encircling a liouvillian excep- tional point,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 110402 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Experimen- tal observation of the topological structure of exceptiona l points,

    C. Dembowski, H.-D. Gr¨ af, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, “Experimen- tal observation of the topological structure of exceptiona l points,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 787–790 (2001)

    2001

  32. [40]

    Encircling an exceptional point,

    C. Dembowski, B. Dietz, H.-D. Gr¨ af, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, and A. Richter, “Encircling an exceptional point,” Phys. Rev. E 69, 056216 (2004)

    2004

  33. [41]

    General description of quasia- diabatic dynamical phenomena near exceptional points,

    T. J. Milburn, J. Doppler, C. A. Holmes, S. Portolan, S. Rotter, and P. Rabl, “General description of quasia- diabatic dynamical phenomena near exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. A 92, 052124 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    Exceptional-point-induced asymmetric mode conversion in a dual-core optical fiber segment,

    A. Roy, S. Dey, A. Laha, A. Biswas, and S. Ghosh, “Exceptional-point-induced asymmetric mode conversion in a dual-core optical fiber segment,” Opt. Lett. 47, 2546–2549 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Dynamically encircling an exceptional point for asymmetric mode switching,

    J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. B¨ ohm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moiseyev, and S. Rotter, “Dynamically encircling an exceptional point for asymmetric mode switching,” Nature (London) 537, 76–79 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Chiral state conversion without encircling an excep- tional point,

    A. U. Hassan, G. L. Galmiche, G. Harari, P. LiKamWa, M. Khajavikhan, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Chiral state conversion without encircling an excep- tional point,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 052129 (2017) . 10

    2017

  37. [45]

    Observation of chiral state transfer without encircling an exceptional point,

    H. Nasari, G. Lopez-Galmiche, H. E. Lopez-Aviles, A. Schumer, A. U. Hassan, Q. Zhong, S. Rot- ter, P. LiKamWa, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, “Observation of chiral state transfer without encircling an exceptional point,” Nature (London) 605, 256–261 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Chirality of wave- functions for three coalescing levels,

    W. D. Heiss, “Chirality of wave- functions for three coalescing levels,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 244010 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    Symme- try and higher-order exceptional points,

    I. Mandal and E. J. Bergholtz, “Symme- try and higher-order exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 186601 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Realizing exceptional points of any order in the presence of symmetry,

    S. Sayyad and F. K. Kunst, “Realizing exceptional points of any order in the presence of symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023130 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Dynamically encircling exceptional points in a three-mode waveguide system,

    X.-L. Zhang and C. T. Chan, “Dynamically encircling exceptional points in a three-mode waveguide system,” Commun. Phys. 2, 63 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Nonlinearity-induced anomalous mode collapse and nonchiral asymmetric mode switching around multiple exceptional points,

    S. Dey, A. Laha, and S. Ghosh, “Nonlinearity-induced anomalous mode collapse and nonchiral asymmetric mode switching around multiple exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 125432 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Chirality breakdown in the presence of multiple exceptional points and specific mode excitation,

    H. K. Gandhi, A. Laha, S. Dey, and S. Ghosh, “Chirality breakdown in the presence of multiple exceptional points and specific mode excitation,” Opt. Lett. 45, 1439–1442 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Asym- metric guidance of multiple hybrid modes through a gain-loss-assisted planar coupled-waveguide sys- tem hosting higher-order exceptional points,

    A. Paul, A. Laha, S. Dey, and S. Ghosh, “Asym- metric guidance of multiple hybrid modes through a gain-loss-assisted planar coupled-waveguide sys- tem hosting higher-order exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. A 104, 063503 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Observation of anti-parity-time-symmetry, phase transitions and exceptional points in an optical fibre,

    A. Bergman, R. Duggan, K. Sharma, M. Tur, A. Zadok, and A. Al` u, “Observation of anti-parity-time-symmetry, phase transitions and exceptional points in an optical fibre,” Nat. Commun. 12, 486 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Excep- tional points in open quantum systems,

    M. M¨ uller and I. Rotter, “Excep- tional points in open quantum systems,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 244018 (2008)

    2008

  47. [55]

    Analysis of multiple exceptional points related to three inter- acting eigenmodes in a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian,

    J.-W. Ryu, S.-Y. Lee, and S. W. Kim, “Analysis of multiple exceptional points related to three inter- acting eigenmodes in a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 042101 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    Encounter of higher order exceptional singularities and towards cas- caded state conversion,

    S. Bhattacherjee, A. Laha, and S. Ghosh, “Encounter of higher order exceptional singularities and towards cas- caded state conversion,” Phys. Scr. 94, 085202 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.