pith. sign in

Integrity report for How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

A machine-verified record of the checks Pith has run against this paper: detector runs, findings, signed bundle events, and canonical identifiers.

arXiv:2605.30096 · pith:2026:YDSBATVFRPYN5JTS7XUHBQFIUK

0Critical
0Advisory
5Detectors run
2026-06-05Last checked

Paper page arXiv integrity.json bundle.json

Detector runs

ai_meta_artifact skipped v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-06-05 03:35:50.227308+00:00
claim_evidence completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-06-03 12:48:25.050959+00:00
citation_quote_validity skipped v0.1.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-31 09:50:44.194479+00:00
shingle_duplication skipped v0.1.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-30 01:50:05.546784+00:00
cited_work_retraction completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-29 06:24:19.270940+00:00

Findings

No public integrity findings for this paper.

Signed record

The machine-readable record for this paper lives at /pith/YDSBATVFRPYN5JTS7XUHBQFIUK/integrity.json. Pith Number bundles also include signed pith.integrity.v1 events where a Pith Number exists.