Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Combining Model-Based and Model-Free Updates for Trajectory-Centric Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1703.03078 v3 pith:YF75QKFC submitted 2017-03-08 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords model-basedmodel-freelearningmethodscombinemethodpoliciespolicy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for real-world robotic applications need a data-efficient learning process and the ability to handle complex, unknown dynamical systems. These requirements are handled well by model-based and model-free RL approaches, respectively. In this work, we aim to combine the advantages of these two types of methods in a principled manner. By focusing on time-varying linear-Gaussian policies, we enable a model-based algorithm based on the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) that can be integrated into the model-free framework of path integral policy improvement (PI2). We can further combine our method with guided policy search (GPS) to train arbitrary parameterized policies such as deep neural networks. Our simulation and real-world experiments demonstrate that this method can solve challenging manipulation tasks with comparable or better performance than model-free methods while maintaining the sample efficiency of model-based methods. A video presenting our results is available at https://sites.google.com/site/icml17pilqr

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comparison of Action Spaces for Learning Manipulation Tasks

    cs.RO 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Task-space impedance control as an RL action space reaches success thresholds in fewer training samples than joint torque, PD, or inverse dynamics control across three simulated manipulation tasks.

Pith tools