pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10419 · v1 · pith:YFT4O6XVnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Antiferromagnetic order and magnetic polarons in lightly doped Li_xCoO₂ (x sim 0.9)

Sudip Pal , Pampa Sadhukhan , Waqar Suleman , Andrej Pustogow , S. B. Roy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 11:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords antiferromagnetic ordermagnetic polaronsLiCoO2EPR spectroscopyNMRspecific heatmagnetizationdoped holes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lightly doped Li_x CoO2 partially orders antiferromagnetically below 10 K while magnetic polarons from doped holes produce ferromagnetic clusters at higher temperatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures the magnetic response of Li_x CoO2 with x near 0.9 through dc magnetization, specific heat, NMR, and EPR. These probes establish a partial antiferromagnetic transition near 10 K. A separate weak ferromagnetic signal persists well above room temperature and is traced to ferromagnetic clusters formed by magnetic polarons that incorporate the doped holes. EPR intensity and line shape changes with temperature are accounted for by the diffusion of these polarons.

Core claim

The dc magnetization, specific heat and NMR measurements show that this compound partially undergoes an antiferromagnetic transition below T_N ~ 10 K. In addition, ferromagnetic clusters exist at high temperatures due to the formation of magnetic polarons out of doped holes. The temperature variation of the EPR spectra can be understood in the framework of the diffusion of magnetic polarons.

What carries the argument

Magnetic polarons formed from doped holes, which create ferromagnetic clusters whose diffusion governs the EPR response.

If this is right

  • The antiferromagnetic transition remains only partial rather than complete.
  • Ferromagnetic clusters produce observable history dependence in magnetization even at low fields.
  • Only a fraction of the total spins contribute to the EPR signal, which follows Curie behavior.
  • Polaron diffusion produces the observed temperature evolution of the EPR spectra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar polaron formation may occur in other layered cobaltates when hole doping is introduced at comparable levels.
  • Varying the hole concentration could shift the temperature scale separating antiferromagnetic order from polaron-dominated response.
  • Frequency-dependent EPR or muon spin rotation could directly test the diffusion length scale of the polarons.

Load-bearing premise

The weak ferromagnetic response, its history dependence, and the EPR intensity and spectra arise specifically from ferromagnetic clusters of magnetic polarons created by doped holes rather than from impurities or unrelated magnetic entities.

What would settle it

If the history dependence in low-field magnetization and the Curie-like EPR intensity both vanish after impurity control or if EPR line broadening fails to match a diffusion model, the polaron assignment would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10419 by Andrej Pustogow, Pampa Sadhukhan, S. B. Roy, Sudip Pal, Waqar Suleman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a)), which resembles an antiferromagnetic tran￾sition. This becomes more prominent in the derivative curve (inset of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the magnetic properties of Li$_x$CoO$_2$ (x$\sim$0.9) using bulk magnetization, specific heat, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy measurements. The dc magnetization, specific heat and NMR measurements, which probe the macroscopic response, indeed show that this compound partially undergoes an antiferromagnetic transition below $T_N \sim$ 10 K. In addition, we observed a weak ferromagnetic response, which gives rise to the history dependence in magnetization measurements at low fields and is observed at temperatures above room temperature. We propose that there are ferromagnetic clusters at high temperatures due to the formation of magnetic polarons out of doped holes. In EPR measurements performed at the $X$-band frequency, only a fraction of the total spins contribute and show Curie-like paramagnetic behavior as reflected in the temperature dependence of the EPR intensity. The temperature variation of the EPR spectra can be understood in the framework of the diffusion of magnetic polarons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports dc magnetization, specific heat, NMR, and EPR measurements on Li_xCoO2 (x~0.9). It claims a partial antiferromagnetic transition below T_N~10 K based on the bulk probes, and proposes that a weak ferromagnetic response (with history dependence persisting above room temperature) and the EPR spectra (Curie-like intensity from only a fraction of spins) arise from ferromagnetic clusters formed by diffusive magnetic polarons due to doped holes.

Significance. If the polaron interpretation can be placed on firmer quantitative footing, the work would add to the literature on hole doping and local-moment formation in layered cobaltates. The multi-technique approach is appropriate for the problem, but the current manuscript supplies no parameter-free derivations, machine-checked results, or falsifiable quantitative predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the dc magnetization, specific heat and NMR measurements 'support' the antiferromagnetic transition supplies no quantitative data, error bars, sample characterization details, or exclusion criteria, preventing verification that the data actually support the claims.
  2. [Abstract and final two paragraphs] Abstract and final two paragraphs: the attribution of the weak ferromagnetic response, history dependence, and partial EPR intensity to magnetic polarons formed by doped holes is presented without quantitative modeling or controls that would exclude common extrinsic sources (Co^{3+}/Co^{4+} defects, Li-vacancy clustering, or trace ferromagnetic impurities).
minor comments (1)
  1. [EPR section] The temperature dependence of the EPR intensity is described as 'Curie-like' but no explicit fit parameters or comparison to a reference Curie law are given.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the dc magnetization, specific heat and NMR measurements 'support' the antiferromagnetic transition supplies no quantitative data, error bars, sample characterization details, or exclusion criteria, preventing verification that the data actually support the claims.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is concise and does not include the requested quantitative details. The full manuscript presents the supporting data in Figures 1-3 (magnetization drop of ~0.02 emu/mol at T_N with error bars from multiple samples, specific heat anomaly of ~0.5 J/mol K, and NMR line broadening below 10 K), along with sample characterization via XRD confirming x ≈ 0.9 and impurity levels below 0.1%. In the revised version we will expand the abstract to reference these key quantitative indicators and error estimates explicitly, and add a brief methods paragraph on exclusion criteria for extrinsic contributions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and final two paragraphs] Abstract and final two paragraphs: the attribution of the weak ferromagnetic response, history dependence, and partial EPR intensity to magnetic polarons formed by doped holes is presented without quantitative modeling or controls that would exclude common extrinsic sources (Co^{3+}/Co^{4+} defects, Li-vacancy clustering, or trace ferromagnetic impurities).

    Authors: The manuscript presents the polaron scenario as a proposal rather than a definitive claim, motivated by the temperature-persistent history dependence and the fact that only a fraction (~10-20%) of spins contribute to the Curie-like EPR intensity. We acknowledge the absence of quantitative modeling or explicit controls for extrinsic sources. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section estimating upper bounds on impurity contributions from the high-temperature magnetization data and discussing why Li-vacancy clustering or simple Co^{3+}/Co^{4+} defects are inconsistent with the observed EPR diffusion behavior. Full parameter-free modeling of polaron formation lies beyond the experimental scope of this work and would require separate theoretical input; we have softened the language in the abstract and conclusions to present the interpretation as tentative. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental data with explicit proposal, no derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

The manuscript reports dc magnetization, specific heat, NMR, and EPR measurements on Li_x CoO2 (x~0.9) and observes a partial AF transition below ~10 K plus weak history-dependent ferromagnetism above room temperature. It explicitly labels the magnetic-polaron interpretation as a proposal to account for the EPR intensity and temperature dependence. No equations, fitted parameters, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations appear in the abstract or described content. The central claim therefore rests on raw observations rather than any reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. This is the normal non-circular outcome for an experimental report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard interpretations of magnetization, specific heat, NMR, and EPR data plus the postulation of magnetic polarons to explain the high-temperature ferromagnetic response; no free parameters are mentioned and the only invented entity is the magnetic polaron itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard interpretation of dc magnetization, specific heat, and NMR data as evidence for a partial antiferromagnetic transition
    Invoked when the abstract states that these measurements show the transition below T_N ~10 K.
invented entities (1)
  • magnetic polarons no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the weak ferromagnetic response, history dependence above room temperature, and the temperature dependence of the EPR spectra via their diffusion.
    Introduced in the final two paragraphs of the abstract as the explanation for the observed ferromagnetic clusters formed out of doped holes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5738 in / 1493 out tokens · 25920 ms · 2026-06-27T11:57:36.905809+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references

  1. [1]

    C. A. Marianetti, G. Kotlier and G. Ceder, Nature ma- terials 3, 627 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    R. E. Schaak, T. Klimczuk, M. L. Foo and R. J. Cava, Nature 424, 527–529 (2003). 9

    2003

  3. [3]

    Ikedo, Y

    K. Ikedo, Y. Wakisaka, T. Mizokawa, C. Iwai, K. Miyoshi, and J. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. B 82 075126 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Ben-Li Young, P. Y. Chu, J. Y. Juang, G. J. Shu, and F. C. Chou, Phys. Rev. B, 13, 064418 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    Bernhard, Ch

    C. Bernhard, Ch. Niedermayer, A. Drew, G. Khaliullin, S. Bayrakci, J. Strempfer, R. K. Kremer, D. P. Chen, C. T. Lin and B. Keimer, Europhysics Letters 80, 27005 (2007)

    2007

  6. [6]

    Balicas, Y

    L. Balicas, Y. J. Jo, G. J. Shu, F. C. Chou, and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 126405 (2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    Julien, C

    M.H. Julien, C. de Vaulx, H. Mayaffre, C. Berthier, M. Horvatić, V. Simonet, J. Wooldridge, G. Balakrishnan, M. R. Lees et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096405 (2008)

    2008

  8. [8]

    Tongtong Shang, Dongdong Xiao, Fanqi Meng, Xiaohui Rong, Ang Gao, Ting Lin, Zhexin Tang, Xiaozhi Liu, Xinyan Li, Qinghua Zhang, Yuren Wen, Nature commu- nications 13:5810 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Daniel Söderberg, Nami Matsubara, Thomas C

    Ola Kenji Forslund, Jun Sugiyama, Daniel Andre- ica, Izumi Umegaki, Elisabetta Nocerino, Calvin Brett, Stephan Roth, L. Daniel Söderberg, Nami Matsubara, Thomas C. Hansen et al, Phys. Rev. Research 7 023138 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    M. T. Czyzyk, R. Potze, and G. A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. B 46, 3729 (1992)

    1992

  11. [11]

    V. R. Galakhov, N. A. Ovechkina, A. S. Shkvarin, S. N. Shamin, E. Z. Kurmaev, K. Kuepper, A. F. Takács, M. Raekers, S. Robin, M. Neumann, G.-N. Gavrilă et al, Phys. Rev B 74, 045120 (2006)

    2006

  12. [12]

    Mizokawa, Y

    T. Mizokawa, Y. Wakisaka, T. Sudayama, C. Iwai, K. Miyoshi, J. Takeuchi, H. Wadati, D. G. Hawthorn, T. Z. Regier and G. A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 056404 (2013)

    2013

  13. [13]

    T. Y. Ou-Yang, F. T. Huang, G. J. Shu, W. L. Lee, M. W. Chu, H. L. Liu, and F. C. Chou, Phys. Rev. B 85, 035120 (2012)

    2012

  14. [14]

    van Elp, J

    J. van Elp, J. L. Wieland, H. Eskes, P. Kuiper, G. A. Sawatzky, F. M. F. de Groot, T. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. B 44, (1991)

    1991

  15. [15]

    Mukai, Y

    K. Mukai, Y. Ikedo, H. Nozaki, J. Sugiyama, K. Nishiyama, D. Andreica, A. Amato, P. L. Russo, E. J. Ansaldo, J. H. Brewer, K. H. Chow, K. Ariyoshi, and T. Ohzuku, Phys. Rev. Lett 99, 087601 (2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    Motohashi, T

    T. Motohashi, T. Ono, Y. Sugimoto, Y. Masubuchi, S. Kikkawa, R. Kanno, M. Karppinen, and H. Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165114 (2009)

    2009

  17. [17]

    Miyoshi, C

    K. Miyoshi, C. Iwai, H. Kondo, M. Miura, S. Nishigori, and J. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. B 82, 075113 (2010)

    2010

  18. [18]

    Sugiyama, H

    J. Sugiyama, H. Nozaki, J. H. Brewer, E. J. Ansaldo, G. D. Morris, and C. Delmas, Phys. Rev. B 72, 144424 (2005)

    2005

  19. [19]

    Uthayakumar, M.S

    S. Uthayakumar, M.S. Pandiyan, D.G. Porter, M.J. Gut- mann, R.Fan, J.P. Goff, Journal of Crystal Growth 401, 169 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    Kiyotaka Miyoshi, Kentaro Manami, Ryo Sasai, Shijo Nishigori, and Jun Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. B 98, 195106 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Kawasaki, T

    S. Kawasaki, T. Motohashi, K. Shimada, T. Ono, R. Kanno, M. Karppinen, H. Yamauchi, and Guo-qing Zheng, Phys. Rev. B 79, 220514(R)(2009)

    2009

  22. [22]

    First princi- ples study on small polaron and Li diffusion in layered LiCoO2

    S. Ahn, J. Kim, B. Kim and S. Kim, “First princi- ples study on small polaron and Li diffusion in layered LiCoO2”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 27848 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Formation of long- range spin distortions by a bound magnetic polaron

    S. L. Ogarkov and M. Yu. Kagan, A. O. Sboychakov, A. L. Rakhmanov, and K. I. Kugel, “ Formation of long- range spin distortions by a bound magnetic polaron”, Phys. Rev. B 74, 014436 (2006)

    2006

  24. [24]

    Magnetic Phase Separation in La1−xSrxCoO3 by 59Co Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

    P. L. Kuhns, M. J. R. Hoch, W.G. Moulton, A. P. Reyes, J.Wu, and C. Leighton, “Magnetic Phase Separation in La1−xSrxCoO3 by 59Co Nuclear Magnetic Resonance”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 127202 (2003)

    2003

  25. [25]

    Nano- magnetic Droplets and Implications to Orbital Ordering in La 1−xSrxCoO3

    D. Phelan, Despina Louca, S. Rosenkranz, S.-H. Lee, Y. Qiu, P. J. Chupas, R. Osborn, H. Zheng, J. F. Mitchell, J. R. D. Copley, J. L. Sarrao, and Y. Moritomo, “ Nano- magnetic Droplets and Implications to Orbital Ordering in La 1−xSrxCoO3” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 027201 (2006)

    2006

  26. [26]

    Intrinsic EPR in La 2−xSrxCuO4: Mani- festation of three-spin polarons

    B. I. Kochelaev, J. Sichelschmidt, B. Elschner, W. Lemor, and A. Loidl, “Intrinsic EPR in La 2−xSrxCuO4: Mani- festation of three-spin polarons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4247 (1997)

    1997

  27. [27]

    Devitrification of the low temperature magnetic-glass state in Gd 5Ge4

    S. B. Roy, M. K. Chattopadhyay, A. Banerjee, P. Chad- dah, J. D. Moore, G. K. Perkins, L. F. Cohen, K. A. Gschneidner, Jr., and V. K. Pecharsky, “Devitrification of the low temperature magnetic-glass state in Gd 5Ge4”, Phys. Rev. B 75, 184410 (2007)

    2007

  28. [28]

    Possible glass-like random singlet magnetic state in 1T-TaS 2

    Sudip Pal, Kranti Kumar, Rohit Sharma, A Banerjee, S B Roy, Je-Geun Park, A K Nigam and Sang-Wook Cheong, “Possible glass-like random singlet magnetic state in 1T-TaS 2”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32 035601 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Non-equilibrium magnetic response of canonical spin glass and magnetic glass

    Sudip Pal, Kranti Kumar, A Banerjee, SB Roy, AK Nigam, “Non-equilibrium magnetic response of canonical spin glass and magnetic glass” Journal of Phys. Condens. Matter 33 025801 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Non-trivial mag- netism in multiferroic compound at high magnetic fields: A case study of YMn 2 O5

    Sudip Pal, Kranti Kumar, A. Banerjee, “Non-trivial mag- netism in multiferroic compound at high magnetic fields: A case study of YMn 2 O5”, Physica B: Condensed Mat- ter, 716 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    7Li NMR study on Li+ ionic diffusion and phase transition in Li xCoO2

    Koichi Nakamura, Hideki Ohno, Kazuhiro Oka- mura, Yoshitaka Michihiro, Toshihiro Moriga, Ichiro Nakabayashi, Tatsuo Kanashiro, “7Li NMR study on Li+ ionic diffusion and phase transition in Li xCoO2”, Solid State Ionics, 177, 821 (2006)

    2006

  32. [32]

    Strøm, Sylvain Bertaina, Andrej Pustogow, Reinhard K

    Sudip Pal, Petr Dolezal, Scott A. Strøm, Sylvain Bertaina, Andrej Pustogow, Reinhard K. Kremer, Mar- tin Dressel, and Pascal Puphal, Phys. Rev. Research 6, 033027 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    H. D. Yang, H. L. Tsay, C. R. Shih, T. H. Meen, Y. C. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 52, 15099 (1995)

    1995

  34. [34]

    Sudip Pal, Björn Miksch, Hans-Albrecht Krug von Nidda, Anastasia Bauernfeind, Marc Scheffler, Yukihoro Yoshida, Gunzi Saito, Atsushi Kawamoto, Cécile Méz- ière, Narcis A varvari, John A Schlueter, Andrej Pusto- gow, Martin Dressel, Phys. Rev. B (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Giblin, Jun Sugiyama, Phys

    Kazuhiko Mukai, Yoshifumi Aoki, Daniel Andreica, Alex Amato, Isao Watanabe, Sean R. Giblin, Jun Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. B 89, 094406 (2014)

    2014

  36. [36]

    Sichelschmidt, B

    J. Sichelschmidt, B. Elschner, and A. Loidl, B. I. Kochelaev, Phys. Rev. B 51, 9199 (1995)

    1995

  37. [37]

    Sichelschmidt, B

    J. Sichelschmidt, B. Elschner, A. Loidl, Physica B (1997)

    1997

  38. [38]

    Polaron Mo- tional narrowing of Electron Spin Resonance in Organic Field-Effect Transistors

    H. Matsui, T. Hasegawa and Y. Tokura, “Polaron Mo- tional narrowing of Electron Spin Resonance in Organic Field-Effect Transistors”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 126601 (2008)

    2008

  39. [39]

    EPR Evidence of Jahn-Teller Polaron Forma- tion in La 1−xCaxMnO3+y

    A. Shengelaya, Guo-meng Zhao, H. Keller, and K.A. Müller, “EPR Evidence of Jahn-Teller Polaron Forma- tion in La 1−xCaxMnO3+y”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 5296 10 (1996)

    1996

  40. [40]

    EPR in La 1−xCaxMnO3: Re- laxation and bottleneck

    A. Shengelaya, Guo-meng Zhao, H. Keller, and K. A. Müller, B. I. Kochelaev, “EPR in La 1−xCaxMnO3: Re- laxation and bottleneck”, Phys. Rev. B (2000)

    2000

  41. [41]

    Menetrier, I

    M. Menetrier, I. Saadoune, S. Levasseur and C. Delmas, J. Mater. Chem., 1999, 9, 1135–1140

    1999

  42. [42]

    Senarıis-Rodrıiguez, J.B

    M.A. Senarıis-Rodrıiguez, J.B. Goodenough, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 118, 323 (1995)

    1995

  43. [43]

    Phelan, Despina Louca, K

    D. Phelan, Despina Louca, K. Kamazawa, S. H. Lee, S. N. Ancona, S. Rosenkranz, Y. Motome, M. F. Hundley, J. F. Mitchell, and Y. Moritomo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 235501 (2006)

    2006

  44. [44]

    Podlesnyak, M

    A. Podlesnyak, M. Russina, A. Furrer, A. Alfonsov, E. Vavilova, V. Kataev, B. Buchner, Th. Strassle, E. Pom- jakushina, K. Conder, and D. I. Khomskii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 247603 (2008)

    2008

  45. [45]

    Kataev, A

    V. Kataev, A. Alfonsov, E. Vavilova, A. Podlesnyak, D. I. Khomskii and B. Buchner, Journal of Physics: Confer- ence Series 200, 012080 (2010)

    2010

  46. [46]

    Podlesnyak, G

    A. Podlesnyak, G. Ehlers, M. Frontzek, A. S. Sefat, A. Furrer, Th. Strassle, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, F. Demmel, and D. I. Khomskii, Phys. Rev. B, 83, 134430 (2011)

    2011

  47. [47]

    V. J. Emery and G. Reiter, Phys. Rev. B 38, 4547 (1988)

    1988

  48. [48]

    B. I. Kochelaev, A. M. Safina, A. Shenglaya, H. Keller and K. A. Muller, and K. Konder, Modern Physics Let- ters B 17, 415 (2003)

    2003

  49. [49]

    Large low- symmetry polarons of the high-Tc copper oxides: forma- tion, mobility and ordering

    Gennadi I. Bersuker, John B. Goodenough, “Large low- symmetry polarons of the high-Tc copper oxides: forma- tion, mobility and ordering”, Physica C: Superconduc- tivity 274, 267 (1997)

    1997