A large, chemically enriched, neutral gas reservoir in a galaxy at z = 6.782

A. De Cia; A. J. Levan; A. Martin-Carrillo; A. Melandri; A. Saccardi; B. Schneider; C. Konstantopoulou; D. B. Malesani; D. H. Hartmann; G. Pugliese

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

A large, chemically enriched, neutral gas reservoir in a galaxy at z = 6.782

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the host galaxy of GRB 240218A at $z=6.782$ holds the largest neutral hydrogen reservoir yet measured for a GRB host at $z\gtrsim6$, with $\log(N(\mathrm{HI})/\mathrm{cm^{-2}})=22.5\pm0.3$, and a metal content…

desk verdict First detailed neutral-gas chemistry at z>6.5, but the headline N_HI needs a proper systematic from the fixed IGM neutral fraction. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04340 v1 pith:YFVZUBG4 submitted 2025-06-04 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE

A. Saccardi , S. D. Vergani , L. Izzo , V. D'Elia , K. E. Heintz , A. De Cia , D. B. Malesani , J. T. Palmerio

show 18 more authors

P. Petitjean S. Savaglio N. R. Tanvir R. Salvaterra R. Brivio S. Campana L. Christensen S. Covino J. P. U. Fynbo D. H. Hartmann C. Konstantopoulou A. J. Levan A. Martin-Carrillo A. Melandri L. Piro G. Pugliese P. Schady B. Schneider

This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.COastro-ph.HE

keywords gamma-rayburstshigh-redshiftgalaxiesdampedLyman-alphaabsorbersneutralhydrogencolumndensityISMabundancesdustdepletioncosmicdawnGRB240218A

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses the afterglow of the gamma-ray burst GRB 240218A at redshift $z=6.782$ to probe the gas inside its host galaxy, when the Universe was roughly 800 million years old. It reports a neutral hydrogen column density of $\log(N(\mathrm{HI})/\mathrm{cm^{-2}})=22.5\pm0.3$, the highest measured so far for any GRB host at $z\gtrsim6$. The same absorption spectrum yields a zinc column density $\log(N(\mathrm{Zn\,II})/\mathrm{cm^{-2}})>14.3$ and an observed metallicity $[\mathrm{Zn/H}]>-0.8$. The paper argues that this is the first detailed chemical characterization of the neutral gas of a galaxy at $z>6.5$, and that the combination of a massive neutral hydrogen reservoir, substantial metals, and dust depletion points to rapid chemical enrichment in the first billion years.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by absorption-line spectroscopy of the GRB afterglow. The neutral hydrogen column comes from fitting the damped Lyman-$\alpha$ (DLA) damping wing with a Voigt profile, to which a Gunn-Peterson contribution from the intergalactic medium is added; the metal column densities come from curve-of-growth and Voigt-profile fits to Zn II, Cr II, Fe II, Si II, and Al II lines. Because many lines are saturated, the fits yield lower limits or measurements that must be treated cautiously. Fine-structure and metastable lines of Fe II and Ni II are fed into a UV-pumping photo-excitation model to estimate the distance of the absorbing clouds from the burst, and a depletion-fitting method using refractory indices separates dust depletion from nucleosynthetic abundance patterns.

What would settle it

Re-fit the same X-shooter Ly$\alpha$ wing with the intergalactic neutral fraction left free or set to values near 0 and 1; if $\log(N(\mathrm{HI})/\mathrm{cm^{-2}})$ drops below about $22.2$ in a plausible fit, the record-column and $[\mathrm{Zn/H}]>-0.8$ claims fail. A second check is to observe the host galaxy after the afterglow fades with JWST or ALMA and measure an independent oxygen-based metallicity from emission lines; an oxygen abundance well below the value implied by $[\mathrm{M/H}]_{\mathrm{tot}}=-0.5$ would contradict the claim of rapid enrichment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the host galaxy of GRB 240218A at $z=6.782$ was already a massive, chemically evolved system at cosmic dawn. Its neutral hydrogen column density $\log(N(\mathrm{HI})/\mathrm{cm^{-2}})=22.5\pm0.3$ is the highest ever measured for a GRB host at $z\gtrsim6$, and the detection of strong Zn II absorption gives $[\mathrm{Zn/H}]>-0.8$. Taking the column densities at face value despite saturation, the paper derives strong dust depletion ($[\mathrm{Zn/Fe}]_{\mathrm{fit}}=1.1\pm0.4$), a dust-corrected metallicity $[\mathrm{M/H}]_{\mathrm{tot}}=-0.5\pm0.4$, and a dust-to-metal ratio $DTM=0.5\pm0.1$ similar to the Milky Way. Fine-structure lines place the closest absorbing clouds at about $620$ pc from the burst. The authors conclude that large neutral hydrogen reservoirs and rapid metal and dust build-up were likely common features of galaxies within the first billion years.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis fixes the neutral hydrogen fraction of intergalactic space at $x_{\mathrm{HI}}=0.2$ because the spectrum cannot constrain it; if the true value differs, the inferred hydrogen column density and every metallicity derived from it shift beyond the quoted uncertainty.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the measurement stands, some galaxies had already built up neutral gas columns comparable to the highest seen by JWST at $z>8$ by the time the Universe was 800 million years old.
Metals and dust can accumulate quickly in early galaxies: the dust-corrected metallicity $[\mathrm{M/H}]_{\mathrm{tot}}=-0.5\pm0.4$ and Milky-Way-like dust-to-metal ratio imply substantial enrichment within the first billion years.
Because GRB selection is independent of host luminosity and stellar mass, such enriched neutral gas may be common in faint early galaxies, not only in the bright ones JWST readily detects.
Fine-structure absorption lines can measure absorber distances at $z>6.5$, giving a new probe of where dense, enriched gas sits relative to star-forming regions during reionization.
Ground-based afterglow spectroscopy can supply chemical abundances of neutral gas at the same epoch where JWST measures ionized gas, making the two views complementary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

I infer that GRB-selected galaxies may carry a substantial share of the metal budget in the reionization epoch, since they are found independently of luminosity; JWST follow-up of this host after the afterglow fades could test that directly.
I infer that if metal-rich neutral gas is typical, dust obscuration could bias high-redshift GRB afterglow samples against the most dust-heavy hosts, meaning the true early metallicity distribution could be even more enriched than observed.
The aluminum overabundance, also seen in two other $z\sim6$ GRB hosts, points to enrichment by very massive rotating stars; searching for correlated nitrogen or sodium anomalies in future $z>6$ GRB spectra would test that interpretation.
Combining fine-structure cloud distances with the high neutral hydrogen column could map where dense, enriched gas sits relative to star-forming sites, giving a direct observational handle on feedback and gas accretion at cosmic dawn.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Thanks for the report. Here's my read.

The genuinely new thing here is that this is the first time anyone has measured metal abundances and depletion in the neutral ISM of a galaxy above z=6.5. GRB 240218A at z=6.782 gives a X-shooter afterglow spectrum with multiple low-ionization, fine-structure, and high-ionization lines, and they extract a lot from it. The methods are standard—Voigt fitting, curve of growth, photo-excitation modeling for the cloud distances—but the application to a z~7 GRB host is new and the results are extreme: log N(HI)=22.5, [Zn/H]>-0.8, evidence for significant dust depletion. If correct, this is a useful anchor point for models of early enrichment.

The paper is honest about its main weakness: many of the metal lines are saturated, and they flag when they are treating column densities as lower limits. They also state clearly that the IGM neutral fraction in the DLA fit is essentially unconstrained and was fixed at x_HI=0.2. What bothers me is that the quoted ±0.3 dex on N(HI) is only the statistical error at that fixed value. Given the known degeneracy between a high-column DLA and a partially neutral IGM damping wing, the systematic could easily be comparable to or larger than the statistical error. They need to either fit x_HI as a free parameter with a prior informed by Planck/quasar constraints, or quote a range of N_HI across plausible x_HI values. This matters for the "highest N_HI at z>6" claim and for the metallicity limit, though the qualitative picture of a massive neutral reservoir probably survives.

The depletion analysis that yields [M/H]_tot=-0.5 and DTM~0.5 is built on treating saturated lines as measurements. They are upfront about this, so I don't call it a flaw, but those numbers should be read as conditional. And the abstract's last sentence, that these features "seem to be common" in early galaxies, overreaches from one line of sight. The discussion is more careful, but the abstract gives the wrong impression.

Net: this is a solid single-object study with an important new data point, a clear systematic that needs addressing, and a bit of overstatement. I'd send it to peer review. The referee should push for a proper treatment of the x_HI systematic and a toned-down abstract, but the core result is worth publishing. If I were working in this area, I'd cite the data point, with a caveat.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. GRB 240218A at z=6.782 was observed with VLT/X-shooter about 26 hours after the burst. The paper reports a damped Ly-alpha system with log(N(HI)/cm^-2)=22.5+/-0.3, a rich set of low-ionization, high-ionization, and fine-structure metal lines, and uses these data to derive an observed metallicity [Zn/H]>-0.8, a dust-depletion-corrected metallicity [M/H]_tot=-0.5+/-0.4, a dust-to-metal ratio DTM=0.5+/-0.1, and an absorbing-cloud distance d_II=620(+230,-140) pc. The authors argue that this is the first detailed chemical characterization of neutral gas in a galaxy at z>6.5 and that the high HI column, metal content, and dust depletion indicate rapid enrichment in the early Universe.

Significance. If the headline measurements are robust, this is an important result: it would be the highest neutral hydrogen column density measured for a GRB host at z>6, and it would provide a rare absorption-line view of the ISM of a galaxy during reionization, complementary to JWST/ALMA emission-line studies. The paper is careful in several respects: it treats the main metallicity claim as a lower limit where saturation is a concern, it cross-checks Voigt-profile fits with a curve-of-growth analysis, and it uses standard, well-established techniques. The main weakness is that the central N(HI) value is conditional on an assumed IGM neutral fraction whose systematic effect is not propagated into the quoted uncertainty, so the numerical precision of the headline claim is not yet established.

major comments (2)

[Section 3.1] The quoted log(N(HI)/cm^-2)=22.5+/-0.3 is obtained after fixing the IGM neutral fraction to x_HI=0.2, and the text states that x_HI is 'essentially unconstrained in the modeling' because of the substantial local HI component. At z=6.782, the observed Ly-alpha damping wing is the sum of the host DLA and the Gunn-Peterson damping wing from the partially neutral IGM between z=6 and z=6.782; the two contributions are broad and shallow, so N(HI) and x_HI are strongly degenerate. The quoted +/-0.3 dex is therefore a statistical uncertainty at fixed x_HI and does not include the dominant systematic. The authors should refit with x_HI varied over a plausible range (for example 0.0, 0.1, 0.5, with reference to current constraints) and report how N(HI), [Zn/H], and the 'highest at z>6' comparison shift. Without this, the headline numerical claim is conditional on an unquantified assumption.
[Section 4.2 and Table 3] The dust-depletion analysis treats the Fe II, Cr II, and Zn II column densities as measurements (shown in square brackets in Table 3), even though the text repeatedly states that these lines are saturated or blended and should be regarded as lower limits. The resulting quantities ([M/H]_tot=-0.5+/-0.4, [Zn/Fe]_fit=1.1+/-0.4, DTM=0.5+/-0.1, A_V,depl~5) are presented in the abstract and conclusions without the same caveat that accompanies the lower-limit metallicity. The authors should either propagate saturation-related systematics into these derived values or present them explicitly as illustrative values obtained under an assumption, while keeping the robust lower-limit metallicity as the headline result. As written, the paper's strongest conclusions about dust depletion and rapid enrichment rely on measurements that the authors themselves flag as unsafe at face value.

minor comments (5)

[Table 2] The square brackets in Table 2 denote values obtained by treating lower limits as measurements, but this convention is not defined in the table caption or in the main text; it should be stated explicitly.
[Table 3] Table 3 appears to give total column densities summed over absorption components, but it does not say so; the relation to the component-by-component values in Table 2 should be clarified.
[Figure 5] The comparison between [M/H] from GRB absorption lines and 12+log(O/H) from JWST emission lines should be described more cautiously, because the two observables probe different gas phases (neutral versus ionized) and different abundance indicators.
[Section 4.2] The quoted uncertainty of DTM=0.5+/-0.1 appears surprisingly small in view of the +/-0.4 uncertainty on [M/H]_tot; the error propagation should be explained or the uncertainty revised.
[Section 5] The statement that this is 'the first time that strong absorption lines of metals, such as those of Zn II, have been observed at high redshift' should be qualified: strong Zn II absorption has been seen in quasar DLAs at high redshift, so the novelty claim should be limited to GRB host galaxies or explicitly compared with the QSO-DLA literature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper reports independent measurements and uses external calibrations; the fixed IGM neutral fraction is an acknowledged systematic, not a circular input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external data and calibrations. The neutral hydrogen column density is determined by fitting the observed Ly-alpha damping wing with a Voigt profile (Tepper-Garcia 2006) plus an IGM Gunn-Peterson contribution, with the IGM neutral fraction fixed at x_HI=0.2 because it is unconstrained. That is a stated modeling assumption, not a quantity defined in terms of the target result, so it does not make the N(HI) measurement circular. The metallicity [Zn/H]>-0.8 follows from the measured Zn II lower limit and the fitted N(HI) using Asplund et al. (2021) solar abundances; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The depletion-corrected metallicity and dust-to-metal ratio are derived via the empirical De Cia et al. (2016, 2021) method and Konstantopoulou et al. (2024) calibrations, which are published, externally testable frameworks rather than assumptions that encode the paper's conclusions. Self-citations to Saccardi et al. (2023), Brivio et al. (2025), and related work supply companion data, reduction tools, or previously published methods; they are not load-bearing in a way that forces the headline claims. The acknowledged saturation issues and the degeneracy between N_HI and x_HI are robustness/systematic uncertainties, not circular reasoning. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The analysis uses standard assumptions about the ISM/CGM, continuum shape, and excitation mechanisms. One parameter, x_HI, is fixed by hand and its systematic is not fully propagated.

free parameters (1)

x_HI (IGM neutral hydrogen fraction) = 0.2
Fixed by hand in the DLA fit because it is essentially unconstrained; the N(HI) uncertainty does not include the systematic from this choice (Section 3.1).

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The z=6.782 absorption system is the GRB host galaxy, not an intervening system
The authors associate the highest-redshift system with the host because it has fine-structure lines and no foreground absorbers are identified (Section 3).
domain assumption Gas excitation is dominated by UV pumping from the GRB afterglow rather than collisions
Used to interpret fine-structure and metastable level populations and to convert them into absorber distances (Appendix A).
domain assumption The intrinsic afterglow continuum is a power law F_lambda proportional to lambda^(-beta)
Assumed in the DLA fit; beta is fit simultaneously with N(HI) (Section 3.1).
domain assumption The dust-depletion pattern follows the linear relation and refractory indices of De Cia et al. and Konstantopoulou et al.
Used to derive the dust-corrected metallicity and dust-to-metal ratio (Section 4.2).
standard math Standard Lambda-CDM cosmology with Planck 2016 parameters
Assumed for distance and physical calculations (Introduction).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A large, chemically enriched, neutral gas reservoir in a galaxy at z = 6.782." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YFVZUBG4

@misc{pith2026250604340,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A large, chemically enriched, neutral gas reservoir in a galaxy at z = 6.782},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YFVZUBG4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04340}
}

abstract

The chemical characterization of galaxies in the first billion years after the Big Bang is one of the central goals of current astrophysics. Optical/near-infrared spectroscopy of long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been heralded as an effective diagnostic to probe the interstellar medium of their host galaxies and their metal and dust content, up to the highest redshift. An opportunity to fulfill this expectation was provided by the recent blast triggered by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory of GRB 240218A at redshift z=6.782. We study a high-redshift galaxy selected in a complementary way with respect to flux-limited surveys, not depending on galaxy luminosity and stellar mass. We present the VLT/X-shooter spectrum of its afterglow enabling the detection of neutral-hydrogen, low-ionization, high-ionization and fine-structure absorption lines. We determine the metallicity, kinematics and chemical abundance pattern, providing the first detailed characterization of the neutral gas of a galaxy at z>6.5. From the analysis of fine-structure lines we estimate the distance of the closest gas clouds as $d_{II}=620^{+230}_{-140}$ pc. We determine a high neutral hydrogen column density, $\log(N(HI)/cm^{-2})=22.5\pm0.3$, which is the highest one at z>6 determined so far for a GRB host galaxy, as well as a surprisingly high metal column density, $\log(N(ZnII)/cm^{-2})>14.3$. The observed metallicity of the host galaxy system is [Zn/H]>-0.8. We find evidence of a high amount of dust depletion and of aluminum overabundance, although a number of transitions are saturated. The high hydrogen column density, metal abundances and dust depletion in the neutral gas align with those of the ionized gas of very high-redshift galaxies unveiled by ALMA and JWST, testifying that a rapid build up of metals and dust, and massive neutral hydrogen reservoirs seem to be common features of galaxies in the early Universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04340 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** VLT/X-shooter 1D spectrum of GRB 240218A. The grey curve show the raw, stitched VIS+NIR arm, photometrically calibrated spectrum, and the black the binned version (by a factor of 20). The best-fit DLA model with log(NHI/cm−2 ) = 22.5±0.3 is shown as the red curve, with the uncertainty represented by the red-shaded area. The connection region between the VIS and NIR arms is represented by the blue-shaded area. The d… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** VLT/X-shooter optical/NIR afterglow spectrum of GRB 240218A. Left panel: selection of low-ionization absorption lines of the GRB host galaxy system. Here and in the following panels data are in black, the fit is in green, the error spectrum is in red, the continuum in blue and the vertical green dashed lines indicate the center of the components. Middle panel: fine-structure and excited transition absorption lines o… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Results obtained from the CoG analysis on the ISM ab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Abundance pattern observed in the host of GRB 240218A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Metallicity as a function of log(N(H i)/cm−2 ) color-coded by the redshift for GRBs host galaxies and high-redshift galaxies observed with JWST. For GRBs hosts, we report the observed metallicity ([M/H], not corrected for dust-depletion) determined from the afterglow s…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Column density of Zn ii and Cr ii (Watson et al. 2006; Wiseman et al. 2017; Heintz et al. 2019; Bolmer et al. 2019; Selsing et al. 2019) versus log(N(H i)/cm−2 ) (Tanvir et al. 2019), color-coded by the GRB host galaxy redshift. GRB 240218A is marked and compared with …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Trading oxygen for iron II. Oxygen- versus iron-dependent cosmic star formation history
astro-ph.GA 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

Most cosmic star formation occurred in gas with non-solar O/Fe; the cosmic mean [Fe/H] lags [O/H] by up to ~0.5 dex.
SVOM GRB 250314A at z $\simeq$ 7.3: an exploding star in the era of reionization
astro-ph.HE 2025-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

SVOM discovered the long gamma-ray burst GRB 250314A, whose near-infrared spectrum shows a Lyman-alpha break at redshift about 7.3, one of the few such bursts known during the reionization era.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....
[3]

2018, Advances in Space Research, 62, 191

Amati , L., O'Brien , P., G \"o tz , D., et al. 2018, Advances in Space Research, 62, 191

2018
[4]

M., & Grevesse , N

Asplund , M., Amarsi , A. M., & Grevesse , N. 2021, , 653, A141

2021
[5]

D., Barbier , L

Barthelmy , S. D., Barbier , L. M., Cummings , J. R., et al. 2005, , 120, 143

2005
[6]

2019, , 623, A43

Bolmer , J., Ledoux , C., Wiseman , P., et al. 2019, , 623, A43

2019
[7]

2025, , 695, A239

Brivio , R., Campana , S., Covino , S., et al. 2025, , 695, A239

2025
[8]

J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A

Bunker , A. J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A. J., et al. 2023, , 677, A88

2023

Show all 116 references

[9]

N., Hill , J

Burrows , D. N., Hill , J. E., Nousek , J. A., et al. 2005, , 120, 165

2005
[10]

2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1101

Campana , S., Ghirlanda , G., Salvaterra , R., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1101

2022
[11]

2017, Advances in Astronomy, 2017, 8929054

Cano , Z., Wang , S.-Q., Dai , Z.-G., & Wu , X.-F. 2017, Advances in Astronomy, 2017, 8929054

2017
[12]

2025, , 696, A87

Carniani , S., D'Eugenio , F., Ji , X., et al. 2025, , 696, A87

2025
[13]

2024, , 972, 143

Castellano , M., Napolitano , L., Fontana , A., et al. 2024, , 972, 143

2024
[14]

B., et al

Chornock , R., Berger , E., Fox , D. B., et al. 2013, , 774, 26

2013
[15]

J., Fox , D

Cucchiara , A., Levan , A. J., Fox , D. B., et al. 2011, , 736, 7

2011
[16]

2020, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

Cupani , G., D'Odorico , V., Cristiani , S., et al. 2020, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 11452, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 114521U

2020
[17]

2024, , 684, A75

Curti , M., Maiolino , R., Curtis-Lake , E., et al. 2024, , 684, A75

2024
[18]

2025, , 697, A89

Curti , M., Witstok , J., Jakobsen , P., et al. 2025, , 697, A89

2025
[19]

2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35747, 1

D'Avanzo , P., Ferro , M., Brivio , R., et al. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35747, 1

2024
[20]

B., Fox , A

De Cia , A., Jenkins , E. B., Fox , A. J., et al. 2021, , 597, 206

2021
[21]

2016, , 596, A97

De Cia , A., Ledoux , C., Mattsson , L., et al. 2016, , 596, A97

2016
[22]

2018, , 611, A76

De Cia , A., Ledoux , C., Petitjean , P., & Savaglio , S. 2018, , 611, A76

2018
[23]

De Cia , A., Ledoux , C., Savaglio , S., Schady , P., & Vreeswijk , P. M. 2013, , 560, A88

2013
[24]

2024, , 683, A216

De Cia , A., Roman-Duval , J., Konstantopoulou , C., et al. 2024, , 683, A216

2024
[25]

de Ugarte Postigo , A., Fynbo , J. P. U., Th \"o ne , C. C., et al. 2012, , 548, A11

2012
[26]

J., et al

de Wet , S., Izzo , L., Groot , P. J., et al. 2023, , 677, A32

2023
[27]

2011, , 418, 680

D'Elia , V., Campana , S., Covino , S., et al. 2011, , 418, 680

2011
[28]

2009 a , , 694, 332

D'Elia , V., Fiore , F., Perna , R., et al. 2009 a , , 694, 332

2009
[29]

2009 b , , 503, 437

D'Elia , V., Fiore , F., Perna , R., et al. 2009 b , , 503, 437

2009
[30]

D'Elia , V., Fynbo , J. P. U., Covino , S., et al. 2010, , 523, A36

2010
[31]

D'Elia , V., Fynbo , J. P. U., Goldoni , P., et al. 2014, , 564, A38

2014
[32]

X., D'Odorico , S., Calura , F., & Matteucci , F

Dessauges-Zavadsky , M., Prochaska , J. X., D'Odorico , S., Calura , F., & Matteucci , F. 2006, , 445, 93

2006
[33]

2024, , 689, A152

D'Eugenio , F., Maiolino , R., Carniani , S., et al. 2024, , 689, A152

2024
[34]

S., Christensen , L., et al

D'Odorico , V., Bolton , J. S., Christensen , L., et al. 2024, Experimental Astronomy, 58, 21

2024
[35]

A., Goad , M

Evans , P. A., Goad , M. R., Osborne , J. P., Beardmore , A. P., & Swift-XRT Team. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 36166, 1

2024
[36]

L., & Keating , B

Fan , X., Carilli , C. L., & Keating , B. 2006, , 44, 415

2006
[37]

M., Vejlgaard , S., van der Horst , A

Fausey , H. M., Vejlgaard , S., van der Horst , A. J., et al. 2025, , 536, 2839

2025
[38]

W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306

2013
[39]

S., Levan , A

Fruchter , A. S., Levan , A. J., Strolger , L., et al. 2006, , 441, 463

2006
[40]

2004, , 611, 1005

Gehrels , N., Chincarini , G., Giommi , P., et al. 2004, , 611, 1005

2004
[41]

& Razzaque , S

Gehrels , N. & Razzaque , S. 2013, Frontiers of Physics, 8, 661

2013
[42]

2015, , 448, 2514

Ghirlanda , G., Salvaterra , R., Ghisellini , G., et al. 2015, , 448, 2514

2015
[43]

2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

Goldoni , P., Royer , F., Fran c ois , P., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6269

2006
[44]

N., D'Eugenio , F., Jakobsen , P., et al

Hainline , K. N., D'Eugenio , F., Jakobsen , P., et al. 2024, , 976, 160

2024
[45]

E., Malesani , D., Fynbo , J

Hartoog , O. E., Malesani , D., Fynbo , J. P. U., et al. 2015, , 580, A139

2015
[46]

E., Wiersema , K., Vreeswijk , P

Hartoog , O. E., Wiersema , K., Vreeswijk , P. M., et al. 2013, , 430, 2739

2013
[47]

E., Bolmer , J., Ledoux , C., et al

Heintz , K. E., Bolmer , J., Ledoux , C., et al. 2019, , 629, A131

2019
[48]

E., Brammer , G

Heintz , K. E., Brammer , G. B., Gim \'e nez-Arteaga , C., et al. 2023 a , Nature Astronomy, 7, 1517

2023
[49]

E., Brammer , G

Heintz , K. E., Brammer , G. B., Watson , D., et al. 2025, , 693, A60

2025
[50]

E., De Cia , A., Th \"o ne , C

Heintz , K. E., De Cia , A., Th \"o ne , C. C., et al. 2023 b , , 679, A91

2023
[51]

E., Watson , D., Brammer , G., et al

Heintz , K. E., Watson , D., Brammer , G., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 890

2024
[52]

2012, , 756, 187

Hjorth , J., Malesani , D., Jakobsson , P., et al. 2012, , 756, 187

2012
[53]

2003, , 423, 847

Hjorth , J., Sollerman , J., M ller , P., et al. 2003, , 423, 847

2003
[54]

M., Tyson , J

Ivezi \'c , Z ., Kahn , S. M., Tyson , J. A., et al. 2019, , 873, 111

2019
[55]

A., White , N

Kann , D. A., White , N. E., Ghirlanda , G., et al. 2024, , 686, A56

2024
[56]

2006, , 440, 184

Kawai , N., Kosugi , G., Aoki , K., et al. 2006, , 440, 184

2006
[57]

2024, , 681, A64

Konstantopoulou , C., De Cia , A., Ledoux , C., et al. 2024, , 681, A64

2024
[58]

K., De Cia , A., Heintz , K

Krogager , J. K., De Cia , A., Heintz , K. E., et al. 2024, , 535, 561

2024
[59]

2023, , 957, 39

Langeroodi , D., Hjorth , J., Chen , W., et al. 2023, , 957, 39

2023
[60]

Laskar , T., Pe \ n a , C., Schroeder , G., & Alexander , K. D. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35878, 1

2024
[61]

M., Smette , A., et al

Ledoux , C., Vreeswijk , P. M., Smette , A., et al. 2009, , 506, 661

2009
[62]

2019, , 490, 1425

Li , Q., Narayanan , D., & Dav \'e , R. 2019, , 490, 1425

2019
[63]

& Dickinson , M

Madau , P. & Dickinson , M. 2014, , 52, 415

2014
[64]

Malesani , D. B. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35749, 1

2024
[65]

2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

Marconi , A., Abreu , M., Adibekyan , V., et al. 2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 13096, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, ed. J. J. Bryant , K. Motohara , & J. R. D. Vernet , 1309613

2024
[66]

1998, , 501, 15

Miralda-Escud \'e , J. 1998, , 501, 15

1998
[67]

2010, in , Vol

Modigliani , A., Goldoni , P., Royer , F., et al. 2010, in , Vol. 7737, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III, 773728

2010
[68]

2023, , 269, 33

Nakajima , K., Ouchi , M., Isobe , Y., et al. 2023, , 269, 33

2023
[69]

L., Parsotan , T

Page , K. L., Parsotan , T. M., Siegel , M. H., & Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory Team . 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35742, 1

2024
[70]

& Howk , J

P \'e roux , C. & Howk , J. C. 2020, , 58, 363

2020
[71]

2022, Experimental Astronomy, 54, 23

Piro , L., Ahlers , M., Coleiro , A., et al. 2022, Experimental Astronomy, 54, 23

2022
[72]

Planck Collaboration , Ade , P. A. R., Aghanim , N., et al. 2016, , 594, A13

2016
[73]

2007, , 470, 179

Prantzos , N., Charbonnel , C., & Iliadis , C. 2007, , 470, 179

2007
[74]

Prochaska , J. X. 2006, , 650, 272

2006
[75]

X., Chen , H.-W., & Bloom , J

Prochaska , J. X., Chen , H.-W., & Bloom , J. S. 2006, , 648, 95

2006
[76]

X., Dessauges-Zavadsky , M., Ramirez-Ruiz , E., & Chen , H.-W

Prochaska , J. X., Dessauges-Zavadsky , M., Ramirez-Ruiz , E., & Chen , H.-W. 2008, , 685, 344

2008
[77]

2024, , 690, A35

Pugliese , G., Saccardi , A., D'Elia , V., et al. 2024, , 690, A35

2024
[78]

K., et al

Ramburuth-Hurt , T., De Cia , A., Krogager , J. K., et al. 2023, , 672, A68

2023
[79]

2024, , 976, 193

Roberts-Borsani , G., Treu , T., Shapley , A., et al. 2024, , 976, 193

2024
[80]

Roming , P. W. A., Kennedy , T. E., Mason , K. O., et al. 2005, , 120, 95

2005
[81]

D., Kann , D

Rossi , A., Frederiks , D. D., Kann , D. A., et al. 2022, , 665, A125

2022
[82]

2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35762, 1

Rossi , A., Maiorano , E., Stratta , G., D'Avanzo , P., & CIBO Collaboration . 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35762, 1

2024
[83]

B., Palmerio , J

Saccardi , A., Malesani , D. B., Palmerio , J. T., et al. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35756, 1

2024
[84]

D., De Cia , A., et al

Saccardi , A., Vergani , S. D., De Cia , A., et al. 2023, , 671, A84

2023
[85]

2009, , 461, 1258

Salvaterra , R., Della Valle , M., Campana , S., et al. 2009, , 461, 1258

2009
[86]

2025, , 695, A23

Salvestrini , F., Feruglio , C., Tripodi , R., et al. 2025, , 695, A23

2025
[87]

M., Christensen , L., et al

Schady , P., Yates , R. M., Christensen , L., et al. 2024, , 529, 2807

2024
[88]

2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

Schipani , P., Campana , S., Claudi , R., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10702, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, ed. C. J. Evans , L. Simard , & H. Takami , 107020F

2018
[89]

Schroeder , G., Pe \ n a , C., Laskar , T., & Alexander , K. D. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35794, 1

2024
[90]

2019, , 623, A92

Selsing , J., Malesani , D., Goldoni , P., et al. 2019, , 623, A92

2019
[91]

E., Kr \"u hler , T., et al

Sparre , M., Hartoog , O. E., Kr \"u hler , T., et al. 2014, , 785, 150

2014
[92]

1998, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium

Spitzer , L. 1998, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium

1998
[93]

R., Fox , D

Tanvir , N. R., Fox , D. B., Levan , A. J., et al. 2009, , 461, 1254

2009
[94]

R., Fynbo , J

Tanvir , N. R., Fynbo , J. P. U., de Ugarte Postigo , A., et al. 2019, , 483, 5380

2019
[95]

R., Le Floc'h , E., Christensen , L., et al

Tanvir , N. R., Le Floc'h , E., Christensen , L., et al. 2021, Experimental Astronomy, 52, 219

2021
[96]

2006, , 369, 2025

Tepper-Garc \' a , T. 2006, , 369, 2025

2006
[97]

L., Ricci , R., Bruni , G., et al

Thakur , A. L., Ricci , R., Bruni , G., et al. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35866, 1

2024
[98]

C., Fynbo , J

Th \"o ne , C. C., Fynbo , J. P. U., Goldoni , P., et al. 2013, , 428, 3590

2013
[99]

2014, , 66, 63

Totani , T., Aoki , K., Hattori , T., et al. 2014, , 66, 63

2014
[100]

2006, , 58, 485

Totani , T., Kawai , N., Kosugi , G., et al. 2006, , 58, 485

2006
[101]

2024, , 689, A220

Tripodi , R., Feruglio , C., Fiore , F., et al. 2024, , 689, A220

2024
[102]

2023, , 946, L45

Tripodi , R., Feruglio , C., Kemper , F., et al. 2023, , 946, L45

2023
[103]

2024, , 971, 124

Umeda , H., Ouchi , M., Nakajima , K., et al. 2024, , 971, 124

2024
[104]

2011, , 536, A105

Vernet , J., Dekker , H., D'Odorico , S., et al. 2011, , 536, A105

2011
[105]

M., Ledoux , C., De Cia , A., & Smette , A

Vreeswijk , P. M., Ledoux , C., De Cia , A., & Smette , A. 2012, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, 21, 14

2012
[106]

M., Ledoux , C., Raassen , A

Vreeswijk , P. M., Ledoux , C., Raassen , A. J. J., et al. 2013, , 549, A22

2013
[107]

M., Ledoux , C., Smette , A., et al

Vreeswijk , P. M., Ledoux , C., Smette , A., et al. 2007, , 468, 83

2007
[108]

K., et al

Watson , D., Christensen , L., Knudsen , K. K., et al. 2015, , 519, 327

2015
[109]

Watson , D., Fynbo , J. P. U., Ledoux , C., et al. 2006, , 652, 1011

2006
[110]

2016, ArXiv:1610.06892 [ [arXiv] 1610.06892 ]

Wei , J., Cordier , B., Antier , S., et al. 2016, ArXiv:1610.06892 [ [arXiv] 1610.06892 ]

2016 arXiv
[111]

A., Schady , P., et al

Wiseman , P., Perley , D. A., Schady , P., et al. 2017, , 607, A107

2017
[112]

2025, , 639, 897

Witstok , J., Jakobsen , P., Maiolino , R., et al. 2025, , 639, 897

2025
[113]

Woosley , S. E. & Bloom , J. S. 2006, , 44, 507

2006
[114]

M., P \'e roux , C., & Nelson , D

Yates , R. M., P \'e roux , C., & Nelson , D. 2021, , 508, 3535

2021
[115]

2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed

Yuan , W., Zhang , C., Chen , Y., & Ling , Z. 2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed. C. Bambi & A. Sangangelo , 86

2022
[116]

2015, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1506.07735

Yuan , W., Zhang , C., Feng , H., et al. 2015, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1506.07735

2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

[2] [2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

[3] [3]

2018, Advances in Space Research, 62, 191

Amati , L., O'Brien , P., G \"o tz , D., et al. 2018, Advances in Space Research, 62, 191

2018

[4] [4]

M., & Grevesse , N

Asplund , M., Amarsi , A. M., & Grevesse , N. 2021, , 653, A141

2021

[5] [5]

D., Barbier , L

Barthelmy , S. D., Barbier , L. M., Cummings , J. R., et al. 2005, , 120, 143

2005

[6] [6]

2019, , 623, A43

Bolmer , J., Ledoux , C., Wiseman , P., et al. 2019, , 623, A43

2019

[7] [7]

2025, , 695, A239

Brivio , R., Campana , S., Covino , S., et al. 2025, , 695, A239

2025

[8] [8]

J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A

Bunker , A. J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A. J., et al. 2023, , 677, A88

2023