REVIEW
A calibration in $\mathbf R^{16}$ and Federer's product question
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Building upon the construction of a Cayley calibration adapted to a complex structure, we introduce a calibration $\Phi$ in $\bigwedge^8 \mathbf R^{16}$ with $|\Phi^2| = 294$. This enables us to show that the product of two orthogonally supported calibrations is not necessarily a calibration, thereby providing a negative answer to a question posed by Federer. Dadok and Harvey developed a general method for constructing calibrations as outer products of two unit spinors in the Clifford algebra. We show that $\Phi$ arises from the product of two spinors with norm $1$ and $\sqrt{2}$.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.