Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rumors in a Network: Who's the Culprit?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0909.4370 v2 pith:YJLN55TG submitted 2009-09-24 stat.ML stat.AP

classification stat.MLstat.AP
keywords networkrumorcentralityestimatornetworkssourcedistancetrees
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We provide a systematic study of the problem of finding the source of a rumor in a network. We model rumor spreading in a network with a variant of the popular SIR model and then construct an estimator for the rumor source. This estimator is based upon a novel topological quantity which we term \textbf{rumor centrality}. We establish that this is an ML estimator for a class of graphs. We find the following surprising threshold phenomenon: on trees which grow faster than a line, the estimator always has non-trivial detection probability, whereas on trees that grow like a line, the detection probability will go to 0 as the network grows. Simulations performed on synthetic networks such as the popular small-world and scale-free networks, and on real networks such as an internet AS network and the U.S. electric power grid network, show that the estimator either finds the source exactly or within a few hops of the true source across different network topologies. We compare rumor centrality to another common network centrality notion known as distance centrality. We prove that on trees, the rumor center and distance center are equivalent, but on general networks, they may differ. Indeed, simulations show that rumor centrality outperforms distance centrality in finding rumor sources in networks which are not tree-like.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Subcritical percolation and network archaeology on random recursive tree substrate networks

    math.PR 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    For random recursive trees with independent Erdős–Rényi shortcut edges, subcritical bond percolation exposes a decorated tree structure on which Jordan centrality recovers the root within a deterministic-size confidence set.

Pith tools