Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison between two and three dimensional Rayleigh-B\'enard convection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1501.01827 v1 pith:YLKQ6PD6 submitted 2015-01-08 physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords dimensionallargecomparedconvectionenardhigherrayleigh-bsimilar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Two dimensional (2D) and three dimensional (3D) Rayleigh-B\'enard convection is compared using results from direct numerical simulations and prior experiments. The explored phase diagrams for both cases are reviewed. The differences and similarities between 2D and 3D are studied using Nu(Ra) for Pr = 4.38 and Pr = 0.7 and Nu(Pr) for Ra up to $10^8$. In the Nu(Ra) scaling at higher Pr, 2D and 3D are very similar; differing only by a constant factor up to $\text{Ra} = 10^{10}$. In contrast, the difference is large at lower Pr, due to the strong roll state dependence of Nu in 2D. The behaviour of Nu(Pr) is similar in 2D and 3D at large Pr. However, it differs significantly around Pr = 1. The Reynolds number values are consistently higher in 2D and additionally converge at large Pr. Finally, the thermal boundary layer profiles are compared in 2D and 3D.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools