Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

The exterior Steklov problem for Euclidean domains

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In dimensions three and higher, the first exterior Steklov eigenvalue of a convex domain is bounded below by the logarithmic mean of the boundary's principal curvatures — which forces eigenvalues to diverge for fixed-volume thin domains.

desk verdict The paper is worth engaging with, but the central lower bound as printed uses the reciprocal of the intended logarithmic mean and fails for a ball; fix (1.3) before citing. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.09490 v3 pith:YM3ND3SJ submitted 2025-11-12 math.SP math.AP

Lukas Bundrock , Alexandre Girouard , Denis S. Grebenkov , Michael Levitin , Iosif Polterovich This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.SPmath.AP MSC 35P0535P1535P2031A1031B1047A75
keywords StekloveigenvalueexteriordomainDirichlet-to-NeumannoperatorconvexprincipalcurvatureslogarithmicmeanWeinstockinequalityWeylasymptotics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the Steklov eigenvalue problem in the unbounded exterior of a bounded Euclidean domain: harmonic functions on the outside whose normal derivative on the boundary is σ times their trace. Because harmonic extensions to unbounded domains are not unique, a definition needs extra conditions at infinity; the authors supply several formulations — finite-energy spaces, conformal inversion in two dimensions, truncated domains, a regularizing Helmholtz equation, and boundary layer potentials — and prove that they are all equivalent. The central geometric result is an Escobar-type lower bound in dimensions n≥3: for a bounded convex C^{1,1} domain, the first exterior Steklov eigenvalue is at least (n−2) times the infimum over the boundary of the logarithmic mean of the principal curvatures. The bound is sharp for a ball and implies that smooth convex domains of fixed volume can have first exterior Steklov eigenvalues tending to infinity, a phenomenon that cannot occur in the interior problem or in the two-dimensional exterior problem, where the paper proves a Weinstock-type isoperimetric inequality instead. The paper thereby establishes the exterior Steklov spectrum as a genuinely different regime from its interior counterpart.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the normal-coordinate parametrization of the exterior domain, Ψ(s,t)=s−tν(s), whose Jacobian determinant ζ(s,t)=∏_{j=1}^{n−1}(1+κ_j(s)t) measures how boundary length elements inflate along inward normal rays. This factor turns the exterior Rayleigh quotient into a weighted one-dimensional minimization along each ray, and the paper computes the optimal constant for the associated Hardy-type problem (f′ζ)′=0 with decay at infinity; the value (n−2)L(κ₁(s),…,κ_{n−1}(s)) — an identity involving the logarithmic mean and a partial-fraction decomposition of 1/∏(1+κ_j t) — is what ultimately bounds the eigenvalue. In two dimensions the load-bearing tool is different: the inve

What would settle it

Compute (numerically or analytically) the first exterior Steklov eigenvalue of a smooth convex domain — for example, a rounded cube or a very thin prolate spheroid — in R³ and compare it with (n−2) inf L(κ₁,κ₂). Any value below the bound, or a fixed-volume family whose σ₁ stays bounded while the bound diverges, would refute Theorem 1.11/1.18. For the 2D Weinstock part, a simply connected Lipschitz domain with σ₂|∂Ω| > 2π would refute Theorem 1.16; for the ball-rigidity in Corollary 1.12, a convex body with constant geometric mean curvature that is not a sphere would be a counterexample.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The load-bearing discovery is Theorem 1.11. For a bounded convex domain Ω ⊂ R^n, n≥3, with ∂Ω ∈ C^{1,1}, the first exterior Steklov eigenvalue satisfies σ₁(Ω^ext) ≥ (n−2) inf_{s∈∂Ω} L(κ₁(s),…,κ_{n−1}(s)), where L is the logarithmic mean of the principal curvatures; equality holds for a ball, and for the geometric-mean version equality characterizes balls. The proof reduces the exterior Rayleigh quotient to one-dimensional Hardy-type minimizations along normal rays, where the Jacobian factor ∏(1+κ_j(s)t) converts the problem into a family of one-dimensional constants, each evaluated explicitly as (n−2)L(κ₁(s),…,κ_{n−1}(s)). A direct corollary, Theorem 1.18, asserts that for every n≥3 there is

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the lower bound relies on the fact that for a convex C^{1,1} boundary, the normal-ray map (s,t) ↦ s−tν(s) is a bi-Lipschitz bijection onto the exterior with Jacobian ∏(1+κ_j(s)t); if the boundary loses convexity or C^{1,1} regularity, this coordinate representation fails and the derivation of Theorem 1.11 collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • There exist smooth convex bodies of fixed volume, in every dimension n≥3, whose first exterior Steklov eigenvalue tends to infinity; the same holds with surface area fixed.
  • In two dimensions the disk maximizes the first nonzero exterior Steklov eigenvalue among simply connected Lipschitz domains of given perimeter (σ₂|∂Ω| ≤ 2π) and of given area (σ₂|Ω|^{1/2} ≤ √π).
  • The exterior Robin criterion (1.8) turns the curvature bound into a statement about phase transitions: convex domains of prescribed volume can have −σ₁ arbitrarily large, so the negative-Robin-eigenvalue regime can be reached for arbitrarily strong couplings (Corollary 1.19).
  • The counting function obeys a Weyl law of the same order as the interior problem, N(σ)=ω_{n−1}|∂Ω|/(2π)^{n−1} σ^{n−1}+O(σ^{n−2}), so the blow-up of the first eigenvalue coexists with standard universal asymptotics at high frequency.
  • The first exterior Steklov eigenvalue is simple, and each k-th eigenfunction has at most k nodal domains, so the low-frequency spectral structure mirrors the interior problem even where the shapes are not comparable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quantity β(∂Ω)=(n−2) inf_s L(κ₁,…,κ_{n−1}) behaves like a curvature-concentration functional: it vanishes for any boundary that contains a flat patch and diverges when all curvatures grow simultaneously. This makes it a natural design parameter in applications such as diffusion-mediated surface reactions, where a larger β would suppress low-frequency boundary modes.
  • The normal-ray/Hardy-constant method is likely independent of the specific elliptic operator: the same Jacobian ζ(s,t) controls exterior Robin, p-Laplacian, or magnetic Schrödinger problems, and one could test whether the logarithmic mean appears there too.
  • The paper leaves open whether equality in Theorem 1.11 (logarithmic-mean version) forces a sphere; a testable conjecture is that any sufficiently smooth convex domain whose logarithmic-mean curvature is constant must be a ball, which could be checked by first-order perturbation theory around the sphere.
  • In view of Remark 1.17, the conformal dictionary suggests a general principle in dimension two: every isoperimetric inequality for the weighted interior Steklov problem has an exterior analogue; Theorem 1.16 is the first instance, and one could extend it to higher-order eigenvalues via Hersch–Payne–Schiffer inequalities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the exterior Steklov eigenvalue problem on bounded Euclidean domains from several equivalent viewpoints: finite-energy spaces, conformal mappings in two dimensions, truncated domains, Helmholtz regularisation, and layer potentials. Its main positive results are an Escobar-type lower bound for the first exterior Steklov eigenvalue on convex C^{1,1} domains in dimensions n≥3, expressed through the principal curvatures of the boundary (Theorem 1.11), a Weinstock-type upper bound in two dimensions (Theorem 1.16), spectral asymptotics, and a construction showing that in higher dimensions the first exterior Steklov eigenvalue can blow up for convex domains of fixed volume (Theorem 1.18). The proof of Theorem 1.11 reduces the Rayleigh quotient to a one-dimensional Hardy-type constant along normal rays and evaluates it in terms of a logarithmic mean of the principal curvatures.

Significance. If the logarithmic-mean definition is corrected as discussed below, this is a substantial contribution. The unification of the five formulations is careful and fills a genuine gap in the literature; the two-dimensional Weinstock proof is nontrivial because it has to control the image of infinity; and Theorem 1.18 gives a striking contrast with the interior Steklov problem. The variational reduction in §6.2 is elegant and self-contained, and the numerical comparisons with Xiong’s bound are useful. The accompanying scripts and examples are a further strength. However, the central lower bound is currently invalid as stated because of the reciprocal error in the definition of the logarithmic mean, so the manuscript needs a major correction before it can be evaluated as a final contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§1.3.2, Eq. (1.3); §6.2] Equation (1.3) is inconsistent with the displayed two-variable formula and, as printed, makes Theorem 1.11 false. For k=2, (1.3) gives (log α1-log α2)/(α1-α2), the reciprocal of the claimed L. In §6.2 the Hardy constant is K=1/I, with I=∫_0∞ [∏(1+κ_j t)]^{-1}dt=Σ κ_j^{n-3} log κ_j / ∏_{i≠j}(κ_j-κ_i). With L_p as in (1.3), K=1/[(n-2)L_p], not (n-2)L_p. For B_10⊂R^4, σ1=0.2, all κ=0.1, printed L_p=2.5, so the RHS of (1.4) is 5, and 0.2≥5 fails. The intended L must be the reciprocal of the sum, L = [ (n-2) Σ κ_j^{n-3} log κ_j / ∏_{i≠j}(κ_j-κ_i) ]^{-1}; this gives the standard two-variable mean and L(κ,...,κ)=κ. Correct (1.3) and all dependent displays, including Example 6.7 and the proof of Theorem 1.11.
  2. [§6.2, Corollary 1.12] Corollary 1.12 claims equality iff Ω is a ball, but the proof invokes [Mu87, Theorem 2] to conclude that constant geometric mean of the principal curvatures implies the boundary is a sphere. Since Ω is only assumed C^{1,1} and the curvatures are defined only almost everywhere, please verify that the cited theorem applies at this regularity, or state the additional smoothness needed. This is secondary to Theorem 1.11 but is load-bearing for the equality statement of Corollary 1.12.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§1.3.2, Corollary 1.12] The line 'L(α_1,...,α_2)' in the proof should read L(α_1,...,α_{n-1}).
  2. [References] Reference [HelKaNi25] contains a typo: 'and and F. Nicoleau'.
  3. [§6.3.2, Example 6.7] The displayed formula for the k=2 spheroid should be re-derived after the correction of (1.3); as written it appears to use the printed reciprocal definition before the asymptotic line reverts to the intended logarithmic mean.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central lower bound is derived variationally from the finite-energy formulation; self-citations are auxiliary, not load-bearing. A reciprocal typo in Eq. (1.3) is a correctness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The core of the paper, Theorem 1.11, is derived rather than assumed: the proof starts from the finite-energy variational characterization (3.5), changes to normal coordinates via the bi-Lipschitz map (6.2), drops the tangential gradient to obtain the Hardy-type quotient (6.3), and solves the resulting Euler–Lagrange equation (6.5) exactly. No parameter is fitted to any eigenvalue, and the target inequality is not used as an input. Theorem 1.18 follows from applying this theorem to explicit spheroids, so it is a genuine consequence. The equivalences in §5 are proved by approximation arguments, not by definition. Cited results such as [ArtE15], [AuHa14b], [Bun25], and [GirKLP22] are published theorems with proofs and are used for auxiliary statements (functional setting, Robin duality, eigenvalue asymptotics), not to assume the exterior Steklov lower bound; hence self-citation is minor and non-load-bearing. I flag an internal inconsistency in the printed definition (1.3): for k=2 the displayed formula gives (log α1 – log α2)/(α1 – α2), the reciprocal of the two-variable logarithmic mean stated immediately below it, so Theorem 1.11 as printed fails for a ball (e.g. B_10 ⊂ R^4). This is a mathematical typo/error in the statement, not a circular reduction of the derivation to its inputs. The normal-coordinate premise (6.2) is an explicit convexity/regularity hypothesis rather than a hidden import of the conclusion. Overall there is no circular step; the score 1 only acknowledges minor self-citations in supporting material.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rely on convexity and C^{1,1} boundary regularity, normal-coordinate geometry, known conformal and spectral-asymptotic theorems, and a one-dimensional calculus reduction. No free parameters are fitted to data. No new physical or mathematical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Ω is a bounded open set with Lipschitz boundary and connected exterior; for Theorem 1.11 additionally Ω is convex with ∂Ω ∈ C^{1,1}, and principal curvatures are defined a.e. and nonnegative.
    Stated in Theorem 1.11 and used throughout; the proof relies on the geometry of convex bodies with C^{1,1} boundary.
  • domain assumption For a convex C^{1,1} boundary, the normal-coordinate map Ψ(s,t)=s−tν(s) is bijective and locally bi-Lipschitz with Jacobian determinant ∏(1+κ_j(s)t), Eq. (6.2).
    This is the load-bearing geometric premise of the proof of Theorem 1.11; the whole change-of-variables reduction depends on it.
  • domain assumption Functions in the finite-energy space E^1(Ω_ext) can be approximated by compactly supported functions in E^1, enabling cutoff arguments.
    Used in Lemma 5.1 and the proofs of Lemma 5.3 and Theorem 5.6; also allows the change of variables in Theorem 1.11.
  • standard math The Riemann mapping theorem and the classical Hersch-trick/Weinstock trial-function method apply to the weighted interior problem (CT).
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.16, including the equality case via Poisson integral and residue computation.
  • standard math External spectral asymptotics results, specifically [GirKLP22] for mixed Steklov problems and [KarLaPo23] for weighted Steklov problems, are valid as cited.
    Propositions 1.20 and 1.22 are proved by importing these results; they are not re-derived in the paper.
  • standard math The 1D minimization problem (6.3) has its infimum attained, and the minimizer satisfies Euler–Lagrange equation (6.5) with decay at infinity.
    This is proven in the paper by compactness and decay estimates, and yields the exact value K(s,Ω_ext)=(n−2)L(κ_1,…,κ_{n−1}).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The exterior Steklov problem for Euclidean domains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YM3ND3SJ

@misc{pith2026251109490,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The exterior Steklov problem for Euclidean domains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YM3ND3SJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.09490}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the Steklov eigenvalue problem in an exterior Euclidean domain. First, we present several formulations of this problem and establish the equivalences between them. Next, we examine various properties of the exterior Steklov eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. One of our main findings is an Escobar-type lower bound for the first exterior Steklov eigenvalue on convex domains in dimensions three and higher. This bound is expressed in terms of the principal curvatures of the boundary and is sharp, with equality attained for a ball. Moreover, it implies the existence of a sequence of convex domains with fixed volume and the first exterior Steklov eigenvalues tending to infinity. This contrasts with the interior case, as well as with the two-dimensional exterior case, for which we show that an analogue of the Weinstock isoperimetric inequality holds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.09490 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The geometry of an exterior problem. We denote by D ext : H 1 2 (∂Ω) → H − 1 2 (∂Ω), D ext f = ∂ν ¡ H ext f ¢ , the corresponding exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. The following basic result holds. Theorem 1.3. Let Ω ⊂ R n be a bounded open set with Lipschitz boundary and with connected Ωext. The spectrum of the exterior Steklov problem (ES) in Ωext is discrete, and consists of a sequence of eigenvalues 0 ≤ σ1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relations between approaches for n ≥ 3. Conformal mapping Truncated Dirichlet Truncated Neumann Helmholtz equation Layer potentials Exterior Steklov Vanishing flow Theorem 5.9 Theorem 5.14 Theorem 5.16 Proof of Theorem 1.3 Theorem 5.10 Remark 4.9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relations between approaches for n = 2. Remark 1.7. Aside from the pure Steklov conditions on ∂Ω, one can also consider exterior problems with mixed Steklov–Dirichlet–Neumann boundary conditions. This setting naturally arises in some applications, see [HenTW70, Gr25]. The formulations of the exterior problem discussed above, as well as of Theorem 1.3 (with L 2 (∂Ω) replaced by L 2 (∂SΩ), where ∂SΩ is the part of the… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Density plots of eigenfunctions of the Steklov problem in the exterior K ext of the kite. k σk (K ) σk ¡ K ext¢ 2 0.403 0.545 3 0.524 0.571 4 1.183 1.130 5 1.384 1.309 6 1.721 1.746 7 2.018 1.821 8 2.201 2.293 9 2.706 2.450 10 2.785 2.903 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Density plots of eigenfunctions of the Steklov problem in the exterior T ext of the disjoint union of three disks. mal transform method of §3.4 and the finite element calculations in FreeFEM [Hec12] for the corre￾sponding interior domain problem, see scripts cited at t…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The kite domainK from §2.4, its exteriorK ext, and the bounded domainK ∗ = φ ¡ K ext¢ ∪{0}. We remark that φ is a conformal diffeomorphism between Ωext and Ω∗ \ {0}. The connectedness of Ωext implies that Ω∗ is connected; furthermore, if Ω is connected, then Ω∗ is simp…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between the numerical results, our bounds (6.8), (6.9), and Xiong’s bound (6.10) for the exterior of prolate spheroids (top figure) and oblate spheroids (bottom figure). Note that for oblate spheroids, our lower bound is weaker than the one from [Xio23], how…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between the numerical results, our bound (6.11), and Xiong’s bound (6.12) for the exterior of rescaled prolate spheroids. The inset on the left zooms onto very small values of a. Î If we consider an arbitrary, not necessarily convex or star-shaped, domain, t…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: An example of Ωext with a passage. Proof. It follows from the variational characterisation (3.5), that σk ¡ Ω ext¢ ≤ σ D k ¡ Cε,Γ ¢ , where σ D k ¡ Cε,Γ ¢ is the kth eigenvalue of the mixed Steklov–Dirichlet problem    ∆u = 0 in Cε,Γ, u = 0 on ∂Γ×[−ε,ε], ∂νu = σ…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Asymptotic Analysis of the Narrow Escape and Berg-Purcell problems on general three-dimensional domains with reactive boundary patches

    math.AP 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    General 3D domains now admit three-term asymptotic expansions for diffusive capture rates, coupling local curvatures, patch shape and reactivity, and global Green's function interactions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    L. V. Ahlfors, Conformal invariants: topics in geometric function theory . McGraw-Hill series in higher mathematics 371. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973 (reprinted by the AMS, 2010). 10.1090/chel/371

    work page doi:10.1090/chel/371 1973

  2. [2]

    Amrouche, V

    C. Amrouche, V. Girault, and J. Giroire, Weighted Sobolev spaces for Laplace's equation in R ^n . J. Math. Pures Appl. 73:6, 579--606 (1994)

    1994

  3. [3]

    Ann\'e and O

    C. Ann\'e and O. Post, Wildly perturbed manifolds: norm resolvent and spectral convergence . J. Spectr. Theory 11:1, 229--279 (2021). 10.4171/JST/340

    work page doi:10.4171/jst/340 2021

  4. [4]

    Arendt and A

    W. Arendt and A. F. M. ter Elst, The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on exterior domains . Potential Anal. 43, 313--340 (2015). 10.1007/s11118-015-9473-6

    doi:10.1007/s11118-015-9473-6 2015

  5. [5]

    Arendt, A

    W. Arendt, A. F. M. ter Elst, and J. Gl \"u ck, Strict positivity for the principal eigenfunction of elliptic operators with various boundary conditions . Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 20:3, 633--650 (2020). 10.1515/ans-2020-2091

    doi:10.1515/ans-2020-2091 2020

  6. [6]

    Auchmuty, Bases and comparison results for linear elliptic eigenproblems

    G. Auchmuty, Bases and comparison results for linear elliptic eigenproblems . J. Math. Anal. Appl. 390:1, 394--406 (2012). 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.01.051

    doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.01.051 2012

  7. [7]

    Auchmuty and Q

    G. Auchmuty and Q. Han, Spectral representations of solutions of linear elliptic equations on exterior regions . J. Math. Anal. Appl. 398:1, 1--10 (2013). 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.07.023

    doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.07.023 2013

  8. [8]

    Auchmuty and Q

    G. Auchmuty and Q. Han, p -Laplacian boundary value problems on exterior regions . J. Math. Anal. Appl. 417:1, 260--271 (2014). 10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.03.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.03.032 2014

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Auchmuty and Q

    G. Auchmuty and Q. Han, Representations of solutions of Laplacian boundary value problems on exterior regions . Appl. Math. Optim. 69, 21--45 (2014). 10.1007/s00245-013-9215-3

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    Axler, Harmonic functions from a complex analysis viewpoint

    S. Axler, Harmonic functions from a complex analysis viewpoint . Amer. Math. Monthly 93:4, 246--258 (1986). 10.1080/00029890.1986.11971799

    1986

  3. [11]

    Bandle and A

    C. Bandle and A. Wagner, Shape optimisation: variations of domains and applications . Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2023. 10.1515/9783111025438

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Bardos and M

    C. Bardos and M. Merigot, Asymptotic decay of the solution of a second-order elliptic equation in an unbounded domain. Applications to the spectral properties of a Hamiltonian . Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. A: Math. 76:4, 323--344 (1977). 10.1017/S0308210500019673

    1977 doi

  5. [13]

    Bellman, Introduction to matrix analysis

    R. Bellman, Introduction to matrix analysis . Classics in Applied Mathematics 19. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1997. 10.1137/1.9781611971170

    1997 doi

  6. [14]

    Brisson, Tubular excision and Steklov eigenvalues

    J. Brisson, Tubular excision and Steklov eigenvalues . J. Geom. Anal. 32, article 166 (2022). 10.1007/s12220-022-00905-3

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    Brock, An isoperimetric inequality for eigenvalues of the Stekloff problem , ZAMM Z

    F. Brock, An isoperimetric inequality for eigenvalues of the Stekloff problem , ZAMM Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 81 :1, 69--71 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4001\

    2001 doi

  8. [16]

    Bucur, V

    D. Bucur, V. Ferone, C. Nitsch, and C. Trombetti, Weinstock inequality in higher dimensions . J. Differential Geom. 118:1, 1--21 (2021). 10.4310/jdg/1620272940

    2021

  9. [17]

    Bundrock, The Robin eigenvalue in exterior domains

    L. Bundrock, The Robin eigenvalue in exterior domains . PhD dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2023. www.mathematik.rwth-aachen.de/go/id/ckus/lidx/1/file/973341 https://www.mathematik.rwth-aachen.de/go/id/ckus/lidx/1/file/973341

    2023

  10. [18]

    Bundrock, Optimizing the first R obin eigenvalue in exterior domains: the ball's local maximizing property

    L. Bundrock, Optimizing the first R obin eigenvalue in exterior domains: the ball's local maximizing property . Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 204, 1095--1117 (2025). 10.1007/s10231-024-01520-5

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    Cakoni, D

    F. Cakoni, D. Colton, S. Meng, and P. Monk, Stekloff eigenvalues in inverse scattering. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 76:4, 1737--1763 (2016). 10.1137/16M1058704

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    Chaigneau and D

    A. Chaigneau and D. S. Grebenkov, A numerical study of the generalized Steklov problem in planar domains. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57, article 445201 (2024). 10.1088/1751-8121/ad7fab

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    S. N. Chandler-Wilde, I. G. Graham, S. Langdon, and E. A. Spence, Numerical-asymptotic boundary integral methods in high-frequency acoustic scattering, Acta Numer. 21, 89--305 (2012). 10.1017/S0962492912000037

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    T. J. Christiansen and K. Datchev, Low energy scattering asymptotics for planar obstacles . Pure Appl. Anal. 5:3, 767--794 (2023). 10.2140/paa.2023.5.767

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Colbois, A

    B. Colbois, A. Girouard, C. Gordon, and D. Sher, Some recent developments on the Steklov eigenvalue problem . Rev. Mat. Complut. 37, 1--161 (2024). 10.1007/s13163-023-00480-3

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Colbois and S

    B. Colbois and S. Verma, Sharp Steklov upper bound for submanifolds of revolution . J. Geom. Anal. 31, 11214--11225 (2021). 10.1007/s12220-021-00678-1

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, Release 1.2.4 of 2025-03-15. F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain (eds.). dlmf.nist.gov https://dlmf.nist.gov/

    2025

  18. [26]

    J. F. Escobar, The geometry of the first non-zero Stekloff eigenvalue . J. Funct. Anal. 150:2, 544--556 (1997). 10.1006/jfan.1997.3116

    1997

  19. [27]

    Freitas and R

    P. Freitas and R. Laugesen, From Steklov to Neumann and beyond, via Robin: The Szeg o way . Canad. J. Math. 72:4, 1024--1043 (2020). 10.4153/S0008414X19000154

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    J. B. Garnett and D. E. Marshall, Harmonic measure . New Mathematical Monographs 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 10.1017/CBO9780511546617

    2005 doi

  21. [29]

    Giorgi and R

    T. Giorgi and R. G. Smits, Monotonicity results for the principal eigenvalue of the generalised Robin problem. Illinois J. Math. 49:4, 1133--1143 (2005). 10.1215/ijm/1258138130

    2005

  22. [30]

    Girouard, M

    A. Girouard, M. Karpukhin, and J. Lagac \'e , Continuity of eigenvalues and shape optimisation for Laplace and Steklov problems . Geom. Funct. Anal. 31:3, 513--561 (2021). 10.1007/s00039-021-00573-5

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Girouard, M

    A. Girouard, M. Karpukhin, M. Levitin, and I. Polterovich, The Dirichlet-to-Neumann map, the boundary Laplacian, and H\" o rmander's rediscovered manuscript . J. Spectr. Theory 12:1, 195--225 (2022). 10.4171/JST/399

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    Girouard, L

    A. Girouard, L. Parnovski, I. Polterovich, and D. A. Sher, The Steklov spectrum of surfaces: asymptotics and invariants . Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 157, 379--389 (2014). 10.1017/S030500411400036X

    2014 doi

  25. [33]

    Girouard and I

    A. Girouard and I. Polterovich, On the Hersch--Payne--Schiffer inequalities for Steklov eigenvalues. Funct. Anal. Its Appl. 44, 106--117 (2010). 10.1007/s10688-010-0014-1

    2010 doi

  26. [34]

    Girouard and I

    A. Girouard and I. Polterovich, Shape optimization for low Neumann and Steklov eigenvalues. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 33:4, 501--516 (2010). 10.1002/mma.1222

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    Girouard and I

    A. Girouard and I. Polterovich, Spectral geometry of the S teklov problem (Survey article) . J. Spectr. Theory 7:2, 321--359 (2017). 10.4171/JST/164

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    D. S. Grebenkov, Paradigm shift in diffusion-mediated surface phenomena . Phys. Rev. Lett. 125:7, article 078102 (2020). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.078102

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    D. S. Grebenkov, Spectral properties of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator for spheroids . Phys. Rev. E 109:5, article 055306 (2024). 10.1103/PhysRevE.109.055306

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    D. S. Grebenkov, Steklov--Neumann spectral problem: Asymptotic analysis and applications to diffusion-controlled reactions . Multiscale Model. Simul. 23:4, 1607--1664 (2025). 10.1137/24M1689697

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    D. S. Grebenkov and A. Chaigneau, The Steklov problem for exterior domains: asymptotic behavior and applications . J. Math. Phys. 66, article 061502 (2025). 10.1063/5.0228529

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    Hecht, New development in FreeFem++

    F. Hecht, New development in FreeFem++. J. Numer. Math. 20:3-4 (2012), 251--266. 10.1515/jnum-2012-0013

    2012 doi

  33. [41]

    Helffer, A

    B. Helffer, A. Kachmar, and and F. Nicoleau, Asymptotics for the magnetic Dirichlet-to-Neumann eigenvalues in general domains . Preprint (2025). 2501.00947

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Helffer and F

    B. Helffer and F. Nicoleau, On the magnetic Dirichlet to Neumann operator on the exterior of the disk -- diamagnetism, weak-magnetic field limit and flux effects . J. Math. Pures Appl. 205, article 103799 (2026). 10.1016/j.matpur.2025.103799

    2026

  35. [43]

    Henrici, B

    P. Henrici, B. A. Troesch, and L. Wuytack, Sloshing frequencies for a half-space with circular or strip-like aperture. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 21:3, 285--318 (1970). 10.1007/BF01627938

    1970 doi

  36. [44]

    H \"o rmander, The spectral function of an elliptic operator

    L. H \"o rmander, The spectral function of an elliptic operator. Acta Math. 121, 193--218 (1968). 10.1007/BF02391913

    1968 doi

  37. [45]

    Kachanovska, K

    M. Kachanovska, K. Naderi, and K. Pankrashkin, Poisson-type problems with transmission conditions at boundaries of infinite metric trees. Preprint (2025). 2506.11218

    2025

  38. [46]

    Karpukhin, J

    M. Karpukhin, J. Lagac\'e, and I. Polterovich, Weyl's law for the Steklov problem on surfaces with rough boundary. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 247, article 77 (2023). 10.1007/s00205-023-01912-6

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    Kova r \' k and K

    H. Kova r \' k and K. Pankrashkin, On the p -Laplacian with Robin boundary conditions and boundary trace theorems. Calc. Var. 56, article 49 (2017). 10.1007/s00526-017-1138-4

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    Krej c i r \' k and V

    D. Krej c i r \' k and V. Lotoreichik, Optimisation of the lowest Robin eigenvalue in the exterior of a compact set . J. Convex Anal. 25:1, 319--337 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Krej c i r \' k and V

    D. Krej c i r \' k and V. Lotoreichik, Optimisation of the lowest Robin eigenvalue in the exterior of a compact set, II: Non-convex domains and higher dimensions . Potential Anal. 52, 601--614 (2020). 10.1007/s11118-018-9752-0

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    Krej c i r \' k and V

    D. Krej c i r \' k and V. Lotoreichik, Optimisation and monotonicity of the second Robin eigenvalue on a planar exterior domain . Calc. Var. 63, article 223 (2024). 10.1007/s00526-024-02824-3

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    J. R. Kuttler and V. G. Sigillito, An inequality for a Stekloff eigenvalue by the method of defect. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 20:2, 357--360 (1969). 10.2307/2035653

    1969 doi

  44. [52]

    Levitin, D

    M. Levitin, D. Mangoubi, and I. Polterovich, Topics in spectral geometry . Graduate Studies in Mathematics 237. Providence, R. I.: Amer. Math. Soc., 2023. 10.1090/gsm/237

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    Lieb and M

    E. Lieb and M. Loss, Analysis . Graduate Studies in Mathematics 14, second edition. Providence, R. I.: Amer. Math. Soc., 2001

    2001

  46. [54]

    Lu and B

    G. Lu and B. Ou, A Poincar \'e inequality on R ^n and its application to potential fluid flows in space . Commun. Appl. Nonlinear Anal. 12:1, 1--24 (2005)

    2005

  47. [55]

    McLean, Strongly elliptic systems and boundary integral equations

    W. McLean, Strongly elliptic systems and boundary integral equations . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  48. [56]

    Mulero, Compact hypersurfaces with constant higher order mean curvatures

    A. Mulero, Compact hypersurfaces with constant higher order mean curvatures . Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 3:3 447--453 (1987). 10.4171/RMI/58

    1987 doi

  49. [57]

    L. E. Payne, Some isoperimetric inequalities for harmonic functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 1:3, 354--359 (1970). 10.1137/0501032

    1970 doi

  50. [58]

    A. O. Pittenger, The logarithmic mean in n variables. Amer. Math. Monthly 92:2, 99--104 (1985). 10.2307/2322637

    1985 doi

  51. [59]

    G. V. Rozenblyum [= G. Rozenblum], On the asymptotics of the eigenvalues of certain two-dimensional spectral problems, Sel. Math. Sov. 5:3, 233--244 (1986)

    1986

  52. [60]

    Rozenblum, Weyl asymptotics for Poincar\'e-Steklov eigenvalues in a domain with Lipschitz boundary

    G. Rozenblum, Weyl asymptotics for Poincar\'e-Steklov eigenvalues in a domain with Lipschitz boundary. J. Spectr. Theory 13:3, 755--803 (2023). 10.4171/JST/477

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    Sayas, First steps in the boundary element method, 2015

    F.-J. Sayas, First steps in the boundary element method, 2015. team-pancho https://team-pancho.github.io/documents/BEM.pdf

    2015

  54. [62]

    Steinbach, Numerical approximation methods for elliptic boundary value problems: finite and boundary elements

    O. Steinbach, Numerical approximation methods for elliptic boundary value problems: finite and boundary elements . New York: Springer, 2007. 10.1007/978-0-387-68805-3

    2007 doi

  55. [63]

    Weinstock, Inequalities for a classical eigenvalue problem

    R. Weinstock, Inequalities for a classical eigenvalue problem. J. Rational Mech.Anal. 3, 745--753 (1954). www.jstor.org/stable/24900312 https://www.jstor.org/stable/24900312

    1954

  56. [64]

    Xia and C

    C. Xia and C. Xiong, Escobar's conjecture on a sharp lower bound for the first nonzero Steklov eigenvalue. Peking Math. J. 7, 759--778 (2024). 10.1007/s42543-023-00068-2

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    Xiong, Sharp bounds for the first two eigenvalues of an exterior S teklov eigenvalue problem

    C. Xiong, Sharp bounds for the first two eigenvalues of an exterior S teklov eigenvalue problem . Preprint (2023). 2304.11297

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.