Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback

As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 16 of 16 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.08994.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2507.08994 v1

Coverage vector

measured 16 of 16 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.523190Z

measured 16 of 16 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

16 of 16 outbound references displayed

verified exact2
verified fuzzy10
unresolved3
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch1

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 4dadf82c-4564-4200-bb15-e509f137f1fc · outbound

This paper cites 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 log(1/ ) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Stopping Time MCPI lower bound Figure.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 log(1/ ) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Stopping Time MCPI lower bound Figure

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.921378Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 864dbff4-1101-4f4d-9e12-dec34b7f8176 · outbound

This paper cites Hence, from (57), if Nj 4 (∆(j) − 2r(t))2 (58) holds then we will never play actions x∗ (j) or x∗ (j) + 1 when tracking again.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Hence, from (57), if Nj 4 (∆(j) − 2r(t))2 (58) holds then we will never play actions x∗ (j) or x∗ (j) + 1 when tracking again

Reference 2

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.709809Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 3982292f-6c91-49d2-9a83-47e442ed5fd0 · outbound

This paper cites At each confidence level we repeat 100 runs and plot the average stopping time with 90 percent confidence intervals.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback At each confidence level we repeat 100 runs and plot the average stopping time with 90 percent confidence intervals

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.959751Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 71d33dbf-5b94-4e41-aac7-fbc2624b56e0 · outbound

This paper cites Active clustering with bandit feedback.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Active clustering with bandit feedback

Reference 6

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.601720Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 870a8e8c-4a17-4d12-abca-4f0e11ad4efd · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Unresolved cited work

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.868518Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation e41ea26f-2e35-4dcb-9c85-7ad819a70345 · outbound

This paper cites Now, we will make similar arguments to Garivier et al.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Now, we will make similar arguments to Garivier et al

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.811288Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 994dc944-5ef6-4ac9-a309-cbf036c3ab32 · outbound

This paper cites Furthermore, the inequality in (33) is true since we have γ(K − 1)/δ ≥ 3 from our definition of γ.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Furthermore, the inequality in (33) is true since we have γ(K − 1)/δ ≥ 3 from our definition of γ

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.788324Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation d57ec76d-edd5-4d24-be18-1e2f340cb950 · outbound

This paper cites Hence, by plugging in the upper bound from (37) into (36), and observing the dependence of the upper bound on δ we attain the asymptotic upper bound stated in the theorem.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Hence, by plugging in the upper bound from (37) into (36), and observing the dependence of the upper bound on δ we attain the asymptotic upper bound stated in the theorem

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.764078Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 19c6f414-3021-4b0f-b474-6ccb77405fc4 · outbound

This paper cites Where kl(x, y) is the KL-divergence between two Bernoulli distributions with parametersx and y.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Where kl(x, y) is the KL-divergence between two Bernoulli distributions with parametersx and y

Reference 15

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.738614Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation c8dc737d-b55e-4577-96f1-a4f00b70449a · outbound

This paper cites Gaus- sian process optimization in the bandit setting: No re- gret and experimental design.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Gaus- sian process optimization in the bandit setting: No re- gret and experimental design

Reference 1974

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.985586Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 81cb42bb-13e7-461d-aca8-8b80fdd4b13a · outbound

This paper cites Sequential Adaptive Design for Jump Regression Estimation.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Sequential Adaptive Design for Jump Regression Estimation

Reference 2014

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.684741Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation cfd17c64-571c-4fbb-952c-81535d7d83c3 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Unresolved cited work

Reference 2016

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.897316Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation ca5abb80-808f-4096-8c95-b11cf8bfd29e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Unresolved cited work

Reference 2018

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:01.065090Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 670aadbf-c39f-45d0-8237-93102a37093b · outbound

This paper cites The general form of these stopping times are min ( t : inf v′∈V alt K,1(ˆx) KX i=1 Ti(t)D (v′(i), ˆv(i)) ≥ β(t, δ) ).

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback The general form of these stopping times are min ( t : inf v′∈V alt K,1(ˆx) KX i=1 Ti(t)D (v′(i), ˆv(i)) ≥ β(t, δ) )

Reference 2020

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.845429Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation af2c44e5-e037-4e86-a0b4-c1850d49734b · outbound

This paper cites Active Learning of Piecewise Gaussian Process Surrogates.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback Active Learning of Piecewise Gaussian Process Surrogates

Reference 2021

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:00.645404Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Observation 0d0029d2-0cf7-46ef-b9ec-2e74426cd8f8 · outbound

This paper cites and Nowak, R.

Fixed-Confidence Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback and Nowak, R

Reference 2024

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T18:20:01.013365Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.