Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 58 references

Sharp anisotropic $L^2$-Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities associated with the Minkowski functional

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves sharp anisotropic L² Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg inequalities for the Minkowski functional of a smooth strictly convex body, with explicit optimal constants and extremals.

desk verdict The radial-derivative CKN theorem looks sound, but the advertised non-symmetric Heisenberg and max-gradient results rest on a false identity, and the abstract oversells the scope. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25876 v1 pith:YOUDYHWT submitted 2026-07-28 math.AP

Zhenzhen Wei This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 46E3526D1035A2352A40
keywords Caffarelli-Kohn-NirenberginequalitiesMinkowskifunctionalanisotropicradialderivativeHardyidentitiessharpconstantsextremalfunctionsHeisenberguncertaintyprincipleconvexsymmetrization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes sharp L² Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg inequalities in which the Euclidean norm is replaced by the Minkowski functional of a convex body that need not be origin-symmetric. The central move is an identity with an explicit nonnegative remainder: choosing the weight functions A and B turns the identity into a family of Hardy-type and CKN-type identities, and the vanishing of the remainder pins down the extremal functions. The paper proves that the best constant is |N−a−b−1|/2 in the parameter region A and |N−3b+a−3|/2 in region B, achieved by exponentials of powers of the Minkowski functional times an angular factor, with failure of attainment on the critical line a=b+1. If correct, these are the optimal constants for the anisotropic radial derivative, extending the classical Euclidean theory and the symmetric norm-based theory to general convex bodies. A sympathetic reader should care because exact constants and extremals are the exception rather than the rule for weighted interpolation inequalities, and here they come with remainders that quantify the deficit.

What carries the argument

The engine is the anisotropic radial derivative R_K(u)=x·∇u/||x||_K, together with two identities (Theorems 3.1 and 3.2) that express the weighted L² energy as the sum of a divergence term and a square remainder. Choosing A and B as powers of ||x||_K produces weighted Hardy identities and CKN identities; the nonnegativity of the remainder gives the inequalities, while vanishing of the remainder gives the equality equations. The anisotropic Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and the Pólya–Szegő principle for K-symmetrization then convert the radial-derivative bounds into gradient bounds and yield the Heisenberg-type inequalities.

What would settle it

Take a non-smooth or non-strictly-convex body, for instance the cube [−1,1]^N, fix (a,b) in region A, and compute the true best constant in inequality (1.2) by numerical or analytic means. If it differs from |N−a−b−1|/2, the claims do not extend beyond smooth strictly convex bodies, or the sharpness statement itself fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 5.1 states that for a smooth strictly convex body K containing the origin, the anisotropic CKN inequality (1.2) holds for all smooth compactly supported functions away from the origin, with sharp constant |N−a−b−1|/2 when (a,b) lies in the region A and |N−3b+a−3|/2 in region B. Extremals in the completion space have the form Φ(σ_K(x)) exp(t||x||_K^{b+1−a}/(b+1−a)) in A and Φ(σ_K(x))||x||_K^{2b+2−N} exp(t||x||_K^{b+1−a}/(b+1−a)) in B, with the sign of t depending on the subregion. On the critical line a=b+1 the inequality reduces to a weighted anisotropic Hardy inequality, whose constant |N−2(b+1)|/2 is sharp but is not attained by any nonzero function in the completion space; extremi

Load-bearing premise

The calculations require K to be smooth and strictly convex so that the gradient of the Minkowski functional exists and satisfies x·∇||x||_K=||x||_K and ||∇||x||_K||_K*=1; if the passage from this class to all convex bodies containing the origin cannot be made, the announced scope is wider than what is proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sharp anisotropic Heisenberg-type inequalities hold: ∫||−∇u||²_K* dx + ∫||x||²_K u² dx ≥ N∫u² dx, with Gaussian-type optimizer u=κ exp(−||x||²_K/2), and the multiplicative version with constant N/2.
  • Max-type anisotropic gradient inequalities follow: replacing |R_K u|² by max{||∇u||²_K*, ||−∇u||²_K*} preserves the same sharp constants; when K is origin-symmetric these reduce to norm-based anisotropic gradient inequalities.
  • When K is the Euclidean ball, all results recover the classical Euclidean L² CKN identities, inequalities, constants, and extremals.
  • The critical line a=b+1 is fully characterized: sharp constant |N−2(b+1)|/2, non-attainment in the completion space, and an explicit extremizing sequence.
  • Extremal functions are not necessarily radial: they carry an arbitrary angular factor Φ∈L²(∂K,dµ_K), so the optimizers form an infinite-dimensional family.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test is whether the smoothness and strict-convexity hypothesis can be removed by approximating arbitrary convex bodies by smooth strictly convex ones; since the optimal constants in the paper do not depend on the shape of K, success would realize the full announced scope of general convex bodies containing the origin.
  • The explicit nonnegative remainders point toward quantitative stability estimates: the deficit in the anisotropic CKN inequality equals a weighted square distance to the extremal manifold, so one could look for explicit stability constants in this anisotropic setting.
  • Because the constants are shape-independent, the same identity-based approach may transfer to other anisotropic functional inequalities where the Wulff shape is replaced by a non-symmetric convex body, for example in Finsler-geometric settings with asymmetric norms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops an identity-based framework for sharp anisotropic L2-Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities in which the Euclidean radial derivative is replaced by R_K(u) = (x·∇u)/||x||_K for a convex body K containing the origin, with K not assumed origin-symmetric. The main blocks are: anisotropic Hardy and CKN identities with explicit nonnegative remainders (Section 3); Heisenberg-type gradient inequalities claimed for non-symmetric K (Section 4); sharp anisotropic CKN inequalities for R_K with constants |N-a-b-1|/2 and |N-3b+a-3|/2 in the regions A and B, with extremals described in a completion space (Section 5); and max-gradient corollaries. The algebraic identities and the CKN sharpness argument are self-contained, and the constants reduce to the Euclidean benchmark when K is the Euclidean ball. However, the advertised non-even Heisenberg result is not supported: the proof of Theorem 4.1 uses an equality that is false unless the convex body is origin-symmetric.

Significance. If the CKN part is correct, it is a useful contribution: the sharp constants are read off from explicit divergence identities, no fitting step is involved, the constants agree with the Euclidean benchmark, and the extremals are explicit up to arbitrary L2(∂K,dμ_K) angular factors. The completion-space construction is a plausible way to handle non-attainment on the critical line. However, the paper's headline claim of a non-even Heisenberg theory is not established: Theorem 4.1 relies on an identity that fails for non-symmetric K. The paper also does not deliver the abstract's announced 'general convex bodies' scope, since the theorems assume smooth strictly convex K and no approximation argument is supplied. These issues are localizable and potentially fixable, but they affect the advertised scope and require revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, proof of Theorem 4.1, displayed equality following (4.35)] For u_K=v(||x||_K), one has ∇u_K=v'(r)∇r, hence ||−∇u_K||_{K*} = |v'(r)| h_K(−∇r), while |R_K(u_K)|=|v'(r)|. The factor h_K(−∇r) is not identically 1 unless K is origin-symmetric. Therefore the equality ∫||−∇u_K||²_{K*} dx = ∫|R_K(u_K)|² dx used in (4.36) is false for K∈K^ss(o)\K^c(o). This invalidates the proof of both (4.33) and (4.34). In particular, the asserted equality for u=κe^{−||x||²_K/2} would require ∫ h_K(−∇r)² u² dx = ∫ u² dx, which is not shown and generally fails for non-symmetric K. The theorem, and the corresponding abstract claims about non-even Heisenberg principles, must be restricted to K∈K^c(o) or supplied with a new proof and corrected remainder.
  2. [§2 and statements of Theorems 4.1 and 5.1] The abstract promises general convex bodies containing the origin in their interiors, but the main theorems assume K∈K^ss(o), i.e. smooth and strictly convex, so that (2.5) holds. No approximation argument is provided to pass from smooth strictly convex K to arbitrary convex bodies; the constants are K-independent, but the radial derivative and the polar gauge change with K. As written, the announced scope is not established. Please either add a rigorous approximation result or restate the abstract and title to the smooth strictly convex class actually treated.
  3. [§5, proof of Theorem 5.1, completion-space sharpness] Sharpness of the constant for C_c^∞ requires an extremizing sequence in C_c^∞, not merely an element of the completion space. The proof shows ||w_n−u||_{C_{K,a,b}}→0, but does not explicitly show convergence of the Rayleigh quotient (∫|R_K(w_n)|²r^{−2b})^{1/2}(∫w_n²r^{−2a})^{1/2}/(∫w_n²r^{−a−b−1}) to the claimed constant. This can be repaired by first verifying that ∫u²r^{−a−b−1} is finite for the explicit F in all four regions and then using the equality in the completion space together with Fatou and the inequality for w_n; however, as written this step is missing and should be supplied.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§1, Theorem A] The region definitions use lowercase 'n' (e.g. n−2/2) while the rest of the paper uses N. Please use N consistently.
  2. [§2, Lemma 2.1] The Pólya–Szegő principle is stated for all K∈K(o). Since most standard convex-symmetrization references assume an even gauge or a symmetric convex body, please confirm explicitly that the cited result applies to non-even Minkowski functionals, or add the symmetry hypothesis where needed.
  3. [§3, Corollaries 3.11 and 3.12] The displayed remainder terms in (3.29) and (3.31) are typeset in a very compressed way and are hard to parse. Please reformat them for readability.
  4. [§2, Proposition 2.2] The equality case in part (ii) is dismissed with 'We omit no essential details'. Since equality statements are used later, either give the short argument or provide a precise reference.
  5. [§5, Theorem 5.1(iii)] The phrase 'with the zero function giving only the trivial equality case' is ambiguous: for u≡0 every inequality is an equality for any constant. Clarify that nontrivial equality is meant.
  6. [§3 and §5] The statement that the results 'recover the classical Euclidean L^2 theory' is asserted but not systematically verified region by region. A short comparison table or paragraph would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: sharp constants are read from explicit divergence identities and verified by extremizers; no fitted input, no self-citation loop.

full rationale

The paper's chain of derivation is self-contained and non-circular. The Hardy/CKN identities in Section 3 are obtained by direct computation of div(σ_K H(||x||_K)) under the stated smooth strict-convexity hypotheses; the constants |N-a-b-1|/2 and |N-3b+a-3|/2 appear as the computed divergence coefficients and are not fitted to a target. Theorem 5.1 obtains inequalities by discarding nonnegative remainders, compares the two constants algebraically, solves the equality ODEs R_K(u)=t r^{b-a}u (region A) and R_K(u)=t r^{b-a}u-(N-2b-2)r^{-1}u (region B), and proves sharpness by exhibiting these functions and cut-off approximation in the completion space; on the critical line it constructs a standard extremizing sequence. Theorem 4.1 uses the convex-rearrangement Pólya-Szegő principle and weighted Hardy-Littlewood inequalities from Ferone-Volpicelli and Van Schaftingen as external lemmas, with no self-citation by the author; the rearrangement step is independent support, not a self-referential premise. There is no parameter fitted to a subset of data, no known result merely renamed, and no ansatz imported via citation; the only apparent mathematical issue, the equality ∫||−∇u_K||²_{K*}=∫|R_K(u_K)|² employed in the proof of Theorem 4.1 for non-origin-symmetric K, would be a correctness gap rather than a circular reduction, so it does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; all constants are derived from identities. The only inputs are the geometry (K), the dimension N, and the weights a,b. All axioms are either standard calculus/convex-geometry facts or explicitly cited external theorems; no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption K is smooth and strictly convex so that ∇∥x∥_K exists and satisfies x·∇∥x∥_K=∥x∥_K, ∥∇∥x∥_K∥_{K*}=1 (2.5).
    Stated in Section 2 and used in all main theorems (3.1, 4.1, 5.1, 5.2).
  • domain assumption Pólya-Szegő principle for K-convex symmetrization (Lemma 2.1) holds for non-origin-symmetric K.
    Lemma 2.1 is cited from [36]; it is load-bearing for the Heisenberg inequalities in Section 4.
  • standard math Weighted anisotropic Hardy-Littlewood inequality (Prop. 2.2).
    Proved in the paper using layer-cake and the anisotropic Hardy-Littlewood inequality from [57].
  • standard math Anisotropic polar formula.
    Used throughout; standard convex-body measure.
  • standard math Integration by parts on R^N\{o}.
    Foundation of the identities; functions are C_c^∞ away from origin.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sharp anisotropic $L^2$-Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities associated with the Minkowski functional." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YOUDYHWT

@misc{pith2026260725876,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sharp anisotropic $L^2$-Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities associated with the Minkowski functional},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YOUDYHWT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25876}
}
abstract

Let $K\subset \RN$ be a convex body containing the origin in its interior, and let $\hK{\cdot}$ be its Minkowski functional. In this paper, we develop an identity-based framework for sharp anisotropic $L^2$-Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities associated with the anisotropic radial derivative $$ \mathcal R_K(u)(x)=\frac{x\cdot\nabla u(x)}{\hK{x}}, \quad x\in\RN\setminus\{o\}. $$ A key point of the present work is that $K$ is not assumed to be origin-symmetric. Consequently, the Minkowski functional $\hK{\cdot}$ need not be even, and the usual norm-based anisotropic arguments do not apply directly. The main tools are anisotropic $L^2$-Hardy and $L^2$-Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg identities with explicit nonnegative remainders. These identities yield sharp anisotropic $L^2$-Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities whose best constants depend on the parameter region of $(a,b)\in\mathbb R^2$. We also study the attainability of the sharp constants in a natural completion space and obtain the corresponding extremal functions. As further consequences, we derive sharp anisotropic Heisenberg-type uncertainty principles and max-type anisotropic gradient inequalities. When $K$ is the Euclidean unit ball, our results recover the classical Euclidean $L^2$ theory; when $K$ is origin-symmetric, they are consistent with the usual norm-based anisotropic framework. In particular, the present results extend the sharp $L^2$-Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg theory to general convex bodies containing the origin in their interiors, for which the Minkowski functional may be non-even.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25876 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The regions for (a, b) ∈ R 2 . 4 Sharp constants and optimizers for the anisotropic Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle This section is devoted to the sharp anisotropic Heisenberg uncertainty principle associated with the Minkowski functional. The proof combines the anisotropic Hardy-type identity in Section 3 with the anisotropic P´olya-Szeg¨o principle and the weighted anisotropic Hardy-Littlewood inequality. Let u ∈… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Abdellaoui, E

    B. Abdellaoui, E. Colorado and I. Peral,Some improved Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations,23(2005), 327-345. 2

    2005

  2. [2]

    Alvino, V

    A. Alvino, V. Ferone, G. Trombetti and P. L. Lions,Convex symmetrization and applications, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire,14(1997), 275-293. 4, 6, 11

    1997

  3. [3]

    Bao and X

    J. Bao and X. Chen,On the anisotropic Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequalities: Existence, symmetry breaking region and symmetry of extremal functions, Commun. Contemp. Math.,27(2025), Paper No. 2550016, 25 pp. 6

    2025

  4. [4]

    Bellettini and M

    G. Bellettini and M. Paolini,Anisotropic motion by mean curvature in the context of Finsler geometry, Hokkaido Math. J.,25(1996), 537-566. 4

    1996

  5. [5]

    Bianchi, A

    G. Bianchi, A. Cianchi and P. Gronchi,Anisotropic symmetrization, convex bodies, and isoperimetric inequalities, Adv. Math.,462(2025), Paper No. 110085, 36. 4, 6

    2025

  6. [6]

    Bianchi and H

    G. Bianchi and H. Egnell,A note on the Sobolev inequality, J. Funct. Anal.,100(1991), no. 1, 18-24. 2

    1991

  7. [7]

    Brezis and E

    H. Brezis and E. H. Lieb,Sobolev inequalities with remainder terms, J. Funct. Anal.,62 (1985), no. 1, 73-86. 2 35

    1985

  8. [8]

    Caffarelli, R

    L. Caffarelli, R. Kohn and L. Nirenberg,First order interpolation inequalities with weights, Compositio Math.,53(1984), 259-275. 2

    1984

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Caldiroli and R

    P. Caldiroli and R. Musina,Symmetry breaking of extremals for the Caffarelli-Kohn- Nirenberg inequalities in a non-Hilbertian setting, Milan J. Math.,81(2013), 421-430. 2

    2013

  2. [10]

    Catrina and D

    F. Catrina and D. G. Costa,Sharp weighted-norm inequalities for functions with compact support inR N \ {0}, J. Differential Equations,246(2009), 164-182. 2, 3

    2009

  3. [11]

    Catrina and Z

    F. Catrina and Z. Wang,On the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities: sharp constants, existence (and nonexistence), and symmetry of extremal functions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,54(2001), 229-258. 2

    2001

  4. [12]

    Cazacu, J

    C. Cazacu, J. Flynn and N. Lam,Short proofs of refined sharp Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, J. Differential Equations,302(2021), 533-549. 2, 3

    2021

  5. [13]

    Cazacu, J

    C. Cazacu, J. Flynn, N. Lam and G. Lu,Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg identities, inequalities and their stabilities, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9),182(2024), 253-284. 2, 15, 16

    2024

  6. [14]

    L. Chen, G. Lu and H. Tang,Stability of Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities with explicit lower bounds, Adv. Math.,450(2024), Paper No. 109778. 2

    2024

  7. [15]

    L. Chen, G. Lu and H. Tang,Optimal asymptotic lower bound for stability of fractional Sobolev inequality and the global stability of log-Sobolev inequality on the sphere, Adv. Math., 479(2025), Part B, Paper No. 110438. 2

    2025

  8. [16]

    L. Chen, G. Lu and H. Tang,Optimal stability of Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and Sobolev inequalities of arbitrary orders with dimension-dependent constants, Math. Ann.,394 (2026), 77. 2

    2026

  9. [17]

    L. Chen, G. Lu, H. Tang and B. Wang,Asymptotically sharp stability of Sobolev inequalities on the Heisenberg group with dimension-dependent constants, J. Math. Pures Appl.,206 (2026), Paper No. 103832. 2

    2026

  10. [18]

    Ciraolo and R

    G. Ciraolo and R. Corso,Symmetry for positive critical points of Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Nonlinear Anal.,216(2022), Paper No. 112683, 23 pp. 2

    2022

  11. [19]

    Cordero-Erausquin, B

    D. Cordero-Erausquin, B. Nazaret and C. Villani,A mass-transportation approach to sharp Sobolev and Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities, Adv. Math.,182(2004), 307-332. 2

    2004

  12. [20]

    D. G. Costa,Some new and short proofs for a class of Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl.,337(2008), 311-317. 2, 3

    2008

  13. [21]

    Dang and W

    P. Dang and W. Mai,Improved Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities and uncertainty principle, J. Geom. Anal.,34(2024), Paper No. 70, 26. 2 36

    2024

  14. [22]

    Della Pietra, G

    F. Della Pietra, G. di Blasio and N. Gavitone,Anisotropic Hardy inequalities, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A,148(2018), 483-498. 5

    2018

  15. [23]

    Del Pino and J

    M. Del Pino and J. Dolbeault,Best constants for Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities and applications to nonlinear diffusions, J. Math. Pures Appl.(9),81(2002), 847-875. 2

    2002

  16. [24]

    Deng and X

    S. Deng and X. Tian,Gradient stability of Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequality involving weightedp-Laplacian, arXiv:2401.04129, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    A. X. Do, J. Flynn, N. Lam and G. Lu,L p-Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities and their stabilities, arXiv:2310.07083, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    A. X. Do, N. Lam, G. Lu and V. H. Nguyen,Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg and weighted Gaussian Poincar´ e inequalities: a complete characterization of sharpL 2 stability andL p extensions, arXiv:2606.08939, 2026. 2

    2026 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Dolbeault, M

    J. Dolbeault, M. J. Esteban, A. Figalli, R. L. Frank and M. Loss,Sharp stability for Sobolev and log-Sobolev inequalities, with optimal dimensional dependence, Cambridge J. Math.,13 (2025), no. 2, 359-430. 2

    2025

  20. [28]

    Dolbeault, M

    J. Dolbeault, M. J. Esteban and M. Loss,Symmetry of extremals of functional inequalities via spectral estimates for linear operators, J. Math. Phys.,53(2012), 095204, 18. 2

    2012

  21. [29]

    Dolbeault, M

    J. Dolbeault, M. J. Esteban, M. Loss and G. Tarantello,On the symmetry of extremals for the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Adv. Nonlinear Stud.,9(2009), 713-726. 2

    2009

  22. [30]

    Dong,Existence of extremal functions for higher-order Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Adv

    M. Dong,Existence of extremal functions for higher-order Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Adv. Nonlinear Stud.,18(2018), no. 3, 543-553. 2

    2018

  23. [31]

    A. T. Duong and V. H. Nguyen,On the sharp second order Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequality, Ann. Fenn. Math.,50(2025), no. 1, 275-286. 2

    2025

  24. [32]

    A. T. Duong and V. H. Nguyen,On the stability estimate for the sharp second order uncertainty principle, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations,64(2025), Paper No. 129. 2

    2025

  25. [33]

    N. T. Duy, N. Lam and G. Lu,p-Bessel pairs, Hardy’s identities and inequalities and Hardy- Sobolev inequalities with monomial weights, J. Geom. Anal.,32(2022), Paper No. 109, 36 pp. 2

    2022

  26. [34]

    N. T. Duy, N. V. Phong and P. T. T. Hien,Hardy inequalities with Bessel pair for Dunkl operator, Adv. Nonlinear Stud.,25(2025), no. 4, 1127-1141. 2

    2025

  27. [35]

    Felli and M

    V. Felli and M. Schneider,Perturbation results of critical elliptic equations of Caffarelli- Kohn-Nirenberg type, J. Differential Equations,191(2003), 121-142. 2 37

    2003

  28. [36]

    Ferone and R

    A. Ferone and R. Volpicelli,Convex rearrangement: equality cases in the P´ olya-Szeg¨ o inequality, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations,21(2004), 259-272. 6, 11, 12

    2004

  29. [37]

    Figalli, F

    A. Figalli, F. Maggi and A. Pratelli,A mass transportation approach to quantitative isoperimetric inequalities, Invent. Math.,182(2010), no. 1, 167-211. 5

    2010

  30. [38]

    Figalli, F

    A. Figalli, F. Maggi and A. Pratelli,Sharp stability theorems for the anisotropic Sobolev and log-Sobolev inequalities on functions of bounded variation, Adv. Math.,242(2013), 80-101. 4, 5

    2013

  31. [39]

    Flynn,Sharp Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg-type inequalities on Carnot groups, Adv

    J. Flynn,Sharp Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg-type inequalities on Carnot groups, Adv. Nonlinear Stud.,20(2020), no. 1, 95-111. 2

    2020

  32. [40]

    Fonseca and S

    I. Fonseca and S. M¨ uller,A uniqueness proof for the Wulff theorem, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A,119(1991), no. 1-2, 125-136. 5

    1991

  33. [41]

    Ghoussoub and A

    N. Ghoussoub and A. Moradifam,Bessel pairs and optimal Hardy and Hardy-Rellich inequalities, Math. Ann.,349(2011), 1-57. 2

    2011

  34. [42]

    Ghoussoub and A

    N. Ghoussoub and A. Moradifam,Functional inequalities: new perspectives and new applications, Math. Surveys Monogr.,187(2013), xxiv+299. 2

    2013

  35. [43]

    Lam,General sharp weighted Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Proc

    N. Lam,General sharp weighted Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A,149(2019), 691-718. 2

    2019

  36. [44]

    Lam,Sharp weighted isoperimetric and Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Adv

    N. Lam,Sharp weighted isoperimetric and Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Adv. Calc. Var.,14(2021), 153-169. 2

    2021

  37. [45]

    Lam and G

    N. Lam and G. Lu,Sharp constants and optimizers for a class of Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities, Adv. Nonlinear Stud.,17(2017), 457-480. 2

    2017

  38. [46]

    N. Lam, A. Maalaoui and A. Pinamonti,Characterizations of anisotropic high order Sobolev spaces, Asymptot. Anal.,113(2019), no. 4, 239-260. 4

    2019

  39. [47]

    Li and X

    Y. Li and X. Yan,Anisotropic Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequalities, Adv. Math.,419 (2023), Paper No. 108958, 44. 6

    2023

  40. [48]

    E. H. Lieb,Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and related inequalities, Ann. of Math. (2),118(1983), 349-374. 2

    1983

  41. [49]

    Q. Liu, J. Xiao, N. Zhang, R. Zhang and B. Zhu,A Minkowski theory for the exterior capacitary volumes and a resolution of the P´ olya-Szeg¨ o conjecture, arXiv:2607.02273, 2026. 5

    2026 arXiv

  42. [50]

    G. Lu, Y. Shen, J. Xue and M. Zhu,Weighted anisotropic isoperimetric inequalities and existence of extremals for singular anisotropic Trudinger-Moser inequalities, Adv. Math., 458(2024), Paper No. 109949, 51 pp. 5 38

    2024

  43. [51]

    Mercaldo, M

    A. Mercaldo, M. Sano and F. Takahashi,Finsler Hardy inequalities, Math. Nachr.,293 (2020), 2370-2398. 5

    2020

  44. [52]

    V. H. Nguyen,New approach to the affine P´ olya-Szeg¨ o principle and the stability version of the affine Sobolev inequality, Adv. Math.,302(2016), 1080-1110. 6

    2016

  45. [53]

    V. H. Nguyen,Sharp weighted Sobolev and Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.,111(2015), 1276-1321. 2

    2015

  46. [54]

    Shen,On the anisotropic Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg and weighted Hardy-Sobolev type inequalities: Sharp constants, existence and explicit form of extremal functions, Discrete Contin

    Y. Shen,On the anisotropic Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg and weighted Hardy-Sobolev type inequalities: Sharp constants, existence and explicit form of extremal functions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., to appear, 2025. 6

    2025

  47. [55]

    Talenti,Best constant in Sobolev inequality, Ann

    G. Talenti,Best constant in Sobolev inequality, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.(4),110(1976), 353-372. 2

    1976

  48. [56]

    J. E. Taylor,Crystalline variational problems, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,84(1978), no. 4, 568-588. 5

    1978

  49. [57]

    Van Schaftingen,Anisotropic symmetrization, Ann

    J. Van Schaftingen,Anisotropic symmetrization, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 23(2006), no. 4, 539-565. 4, 6, 11, 12

    2006

  50. [58]

    Wang and M

    Z.-Q. Wang and M. Willem,Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities with remainder terms, J. Funct. Anal.,203(2003), 550-568. 2 39

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.