Spectroscopic Observations of Four Candidates for Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators. No BLAPs at High Galactic Latitudes

F. Di Mille; J. Borowicz; M. Dorsch; M. Latour; P. Pietrukowicz; U. Heber

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 29 references

Spectroscopic Observations of Four Candidates for Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators. No BLAPs at High Galactic Latitudes

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spectra show no BLAPs at high galactic latitudes

desk verdict Solid spectroscopy of four candidates, but the 'no high-latitude BLAPs' conclusion is a stretch given n=3 and no completeness analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08372 v1 pith:YTYL7IDY submitted 2025-07-11 astro-ph.SR

P. Pietrukowicz , M. Latour , F. Di Mille , M. Dorsch , U. Heber , J. Borowicz This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.SR

keywords bluelarge-amplitudepulsatorsSXPhoenicisstarsGalactichalostellarpulsationspectroscopicclassificationheliumlineshighlatitudemetallicity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests whether Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators (BLAPs), hot compact stars that oscillate every few tens of minutes, exist far from the Milky Way's disk. The investigators took moderate-resolution spectra of four short-period variables originally catalogued as BLAP candidates, three of which sit at Galactic latitudes $|b|>30^\circ$. Those three show no helium lines, and their temperatures, metallicities, and distances identify them as SX Phoenicis stars in the Galactic halo, not BLAPs. Only the low-latitude object ZGP-BLAP-10 shows helium lines and atmospheric parameters typical of a genuine BLAP. The paper concludes that BLAPs are so far confined near the Galactic plane and absent from metal-poor environments, pointing to metallicity as a key ingredient in their formation.

What carries the argument

The identification machinery is the helium-line test combined with two-temperature model-atmosphere fitting. When a candidate's spectrum shows only hydrogen and Ca II K lines, two families of solutions reproduce it: a hot star around 13,000 K with low helium, or a cool, metal-poor star around 7,500 K. The paper breaks this degeneracy by fitting the spectral energy distribution built from multi-band photometry, adopting low foreground reddening, which selects the cool SX Phe interpretation for ZGP-BLAP-04 and ZGP-BLAP-15, and by direct detection of He I lines plus full atmospheric fits for ZGP-BLAP-10. The central discriminator is therefore whether helium lines characteristic of hot BLAPs appear, with the SED fit deciding between otherwise indistinguishable hot and cool solutions.

What would settle it

A search of ZTF, Gaia, and Pan-STARRS or a deeper time-domain survey at $|b|>30^\circ$ for blue variables with periods of 20-60 minutes and amplitudes down to about 0.05 mag, followed by spectroscopy showing helium lines and parameters like $T_\mathrm{eff}\approx30\,000$ K, would refute the claim that no BLAPs exist at high latitudes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By obtaining moderate-resolution spectra covering the Balmer series and helium lines for four candidates from the combined ZTF, Gaia, and Pan-STARRS search, the paper reclassifies three of them. ZGP-BLAP-03 is an early F-type star at $T_\mathrm{eff}=7300\pm500$ K; ZGP-BLAP-04 and ZGP-BLAP-15 are low-metallicity late A-type stars near $T_\mathrm{eff}\simeq7500$ K with $[\mathrm{Fe/H}]\lesssim-2.5$ dex. Their light curves, periods near 50 minutes, small parallaxes, and high latitudes place them among SX Phoenicis variables in the Galactic halo. In contrast, ZGP-BLAP-10 displays He I lines and is fitted with $T_\mathrm{eff}=29\,500\pm700$ K, $\log g=4.28\pm0.10$ dex, and $\log(N_\mathrm{He}/N_\mathrm{H})=-0.81\pm0.10$ dex, matching low-gravity BLAPs. Since the three high-latitude candidates were the only ones in the catalogue beyond $|b|=30^\circ$, their reclassification leaves all genuine BLAPs within $|b|<12^\circ$ (apart from the nearby, disk-related HD133729) and supports the view that BLAPs are not found in metal-poor environments.

Load-bearing premise

The population-level conclusion assumes that the candidate catalogue that supplied these four objects was complete enough to catch every BLAP-like variable above $|b|=30^\circ$, including fainter, lower-amplitude, or shorter-period examples.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every spectroscopically confirmed BLAP is now found within $|b|<12^\circ$ of the Galactic plane, with one nearby exception, so the class appears to be a disk and bulge phenomenon.
High-latitude, short-period, 0.1-0.2 mag variables are more likely to be SX Phoenicis stars, so photometric BLAP searches at high latitude need spectroscopic or helium-sensitive confirmation.
The absence of BLAPs in metal-poor environments supports theoretical models in which enhanced iron and nickel abundances in the envelope drive the pulsations.
The catalogue of BLAPs gains one more spectroscopically confirmed member, ZGP-BLAP-10, with parameters typical of low-gravity BLAPs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the absence holds under deeper surveys, BLAP formation is probably tied to disk and bulge evolution channels such as binary mass loss or white-dwarf mergers, rather than being a general old-population phenomenon.
The conclusion is provisional because the candidate catalogue may be incomplete: fainter, lower-amplitude, or shorter-period BLAPs beyond $|b|>30^\circ$ could have been missed, and a search reaching deeper magnitudes is a direct test.
The hot-versus-cool degeneracy seen here may affect other unconfirmed BLAP candidates whose low-resolution spectra lack helium lines, so multi-band SED fits should be applied before accepting them.
Wide-field time-domain surveys with blue or ultraviolet filters could single out genuinely hot high-latitude candidates, since SX Phe stars are cooler and redder than BLAPs.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First, this is a real observational result: first moderate-resolution spectroscopy of four ZGP-BLAP candidates, three of which turn out to be SX Phoenicis stars in the halo, while ZGP-BLAP-10 is confirmed as a genuine BLAP from He I lines and a consistent hot-atmosphere fit. Second, the paper's stronger claim—no BLAPs at |b|>30°, BLAPs absent in metal-poor environments—is an extrapolation from three objects and never gets a completeness argument.

What it does well: the spectroscopy is careful. The two high-latitude objects with clean spectra show only Balmer lines and Ca II K, and the SED fits choose the cool, low-metallicity solution over the hot, helium-poor one; that's the right way to break the Balmer-line temperature degeneracy. ZGP-BLAP-10 shows He I and fits Teff=29500, logg=4.28, log(NHe/NH)=-0.81, squarely in the low-gravity BLAP regime. The paper also checks for additional periods, gives parallaxes, and is honest that ZGP-BLAP-03's spectrum is contaminated by moonlight.

The soft spots are in the conclusion, not the classifications. Section 5 says "BLAPs remain absent in metal-poor environments" and the title asserts no high-latitude BLAPs. But the sample is three candidates, all from McWhirter & Lam (2022), and there is no analysis of whether that parent search would have found fainter, shorter-period, or lower-amplitude BLAPs at high latitude. The candidates they observed sit at periods 46–55 min and amplitudes 0.13–0.22 mag; the BLAP class spans 3–75 min and 0.1–0.4 mag. If the photometric selection missed part of that parameter space, the absence claim collapses. The stress-test note is right about this. It is a minor-to-moderate flaw in the paper's framing, not a flaw in the measurements themselves. A title like 'Spectroscopy of Four BLAP Candidates: Three Are SX Phe, One Is a BLAP' would match the results.

Who it's for: people working on BLAP formation channels and on SX Phe in the halo. The confirmed BLAP adds to a short list of only ~29 spectroscopically confirmed objects. The paper deserves a serious referee; a good referee would ask for a tempering of the population-level claims and maybe a search of the McWhirter & Lam sample for selection biases. I'd send it to review.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents moderate-resolution MagE/Magellan spectroscopy of four short-period variables selected as BLAP candidates in the ZTF-Gaia-Pan-STARRS catalogue of McWhirter and Lam (2022). Three objects at |b|>30° (ZGP-BLAP-03, -04, -15) show no helium lines; model-atmosphere and SED fits indicate effective temperatures of about 7300-7600 K and low metallicities, and their parallaxes place them at kiloparsec distances, so the authors classify them as SX Phoenicis stars in the Galactic halo. The fourth object, ZGP-BLAP-10 at b=-7.6°, exhibits He I lines; a composite spectral fit including a solar-scattered-light component and an SED fit yield Teff=29,500 K, log g=4.28, log(NHe/NH)=-0.81, consistent with low-gravity BLAPs. The authors conclude that BLAPs are absent in metal-poor environments and state in the title that no BLAPs exist at high Galactic latitudes.

Significance. If the population-level conclusion is accepted, the paper has notable implications for BLAP formation scenarios, ruling out a large halo population and supporting metallicity-dependent driving (Byrne & Jeffery 2020). The individual classifications are carefully derived: the authors use independent SED and spectral fitting, publicly available photometry, and they explicitly identify the two-temperature degeneracy and resolve it with the SED. The confirmation of ZGP-BLAP-10 as a BLAP adds a new spectroscopically confirmed member to a still-small class. However, the population claim rests on three candidates from one catalogue with unquantified completeness, so the strength of the paper lies in the confirmations and classifications rather than in the null-result statistics.

major comments (1)

[Section 5 and title] The population-level conclusion is overclaimed. The title states 'No BLAPs at High Galactic Latitudes' and Section 5 concludes that 'BLAPs remain absent in metal-poor environments,' but the evidence consists of three high-latitude candidates drawn from the McWhirter and Lam (2022) catalogue. No completeness analysis of that catalogue is provided: the parent search covers only δ > -15°, and its sensitivity as a function of period, amplitude, and magnitude is not quantified. With periods of the three SX Phe stars all in the 46-54 min range and amplitudes of 0.13-0.22 mag, the search could have missed shorter-period or lower-amplitude BLAPs at |b|>30° if they exist. Even for a complete sample, n=3 yields only a weak statistical upper limit. The authors should either restrict the claim to 'no BLAPs among the high-latitude candidates from this sample' or supply a quantitative detection-completeness estimate for the ZGP selection.

minor comments (4)

[Section 4] The SED fits that discriminate between the 13,000 K and 7,500 K solutions for ZGP-BLAP-04 and ZGP-BLAP-15 are described but not shown; providing the fits or quoting relative chi-squared values would make the classification of these two objects more transparent and allow the reader to assess the two-temperature degeneracy directly.
[References] The reference to McWhirter and Lam has a typo in the year: 'McWhirter, P. R., and Lam, M. C. 202, MNRAS, 511, 4971' should read '2022'.
[Section 4] One typo in the text: 'ZPG-BLAP-15' should be 'ZGP-BLAP-15'.
[Table 3] For ZGP-BLAP-03, ZGP-BLAP-10, and ZGP-BLAP-15, the Gaia variability class is listed as 'not found to be variable,' yet the paper identifies them as variable from ZTF data; a brief note explaining the difference between Gaia and ZTF variability detection limits would prevent confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper classifies stars using external model atmospheres, SED fits, and independently established class criteria; no fitted quantity is presented as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper is an observational follow-up whose 'derivation chain' is a classification exercise: four photometrically selected BLAP candidates are observed spectroscopically, their spectra and SEDs are fitted with external model atmospheres (Irrgang et al. 2018; Heber et al. 2018), and the resulting temperatures, gravities, and helium abundances are compared with externally established class definitions. No step reduces to its own inputs. For ZGP-BLAP-04 and ZGP-BLAP-15, the 7500 K low-metallicity solution is selected by an SED fit, not by assuming the conclusion; the SX Phe classification then follows from low temperature, low metallicity, halo parallax, and ~50 min periods, all measured or externally defined quantities. For ZGP-BLAP-03, the SX Phe classification rests on absence of helium lines, Teff = 7300 K from the SED, and high-latitude/small-parallax location; the metallicity is admittedly unmeasured, but this is an evidentiary gap, not circularity. For ZGP-BLAP-10, the BLAP confirmation uses fitted Teff = 29,500 K, log g = 4.28, and log(NHe/NH) = -0.81 compared with the parameter ranges of spectroscopically confirmed BLAPs; those ranges are measurements of other stars from prior work, including some by the same authors, but the present fit is independent and the parameter ranges are externally falsifiable data, not assumed conclusions. The population-level statement ('BLAPs remain absent in metal-poor environments') is an extrapolation whose strength depends on the unquantified completeness of the McWhirter and Lam (2022) candidate catalogue, and only three high-latitude candidates were observed; but an incompleteness or small-sample concern is a correctness/robustness caveat, not a circular reduction. There is no equation in which a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no definition of X in terms of Y that yields the result, and no load-bearing self-citation chain that substitutes for evidence. The honest finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This paper is observational, so the ledger entries are fitted stellar parameters and domain assumptions about the data, not invented entities. The population conclusion is only as strong as the completeness of the parent candidate catalogue.

free parameters (6)

ZGP-BLAP-10 effective temperature = 29,500 +/- 700 K
Fitted to the combined spectrum and SED; used to confirm this object as a BLAP in Section 4.
ZGP-BLAP-10 surface gravity = log g = 4.28 +/- 0.10 dex
Fitted with the same model atmosphere grid; consistent with low-gravity BLAPs in Section 4.
ZGP-BLAP-10 helium abundance = log(NHe/NH) = -0.81 +/- 0.10 dex
Fitted from helium line strengths; the presence of helium lines is a key BLAP discriminator in Section 4.
ZGP-BLAP-04 and ZGP-BLAP-15 effective temperature = 7,540 +/- 25 K and 7,580 +/- 40 K
Selected between the hot and cool SED solutions using dereddened photometry; drives the SX Phe classification in Section 4.
ZGP-BLAP-04 and ZGP-BLAP-15 metallicity = [Fe/H] less than about -2.5 dex
Inferred from the SED and spectrum fits; used to identify these stars as metal-poor halo SX Phe variables in Section 4.
ZGP-BLAP-03 effective temperature = 7,300 +/- 500 K
SED fit only, because the spectrum is contaminated by moonlight; supports the SX Phe classification but with lower confidence in Section 4.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The reddening toward ZGP-BLAP-04 and ZGP-BLAP-15 is small, E(B-V) < 0.05 mag, following Schlegel, Finkbeiner and Davis (1998) and Schlafly and Finkbeiner (2011) maps.
Used to choose the cool, around 7,500 K, SED solution over the hot, around 13,000 K, solution for the two A-type candidates; see Section 4.
domain assumption The solar-like absorption features in the ZGP-BLAP-03 and ZGP-BLAP-10 spectra are scattered moonlight rather than light from a cool stellar companion.
The BLAP classification of ZGP-BLAP-10 rests on a composite fit in which the cool component is modeled as sunlight; if a physical companion were present, the hot-component parameters could change. See Section 4 and Fig. 4.
domain assumption The candidate list of McWhirter and Lam (2022) is a complete census of BLAP-like variables detectable in the combined ZTF, Gaia DR2, and Pan-STARRS data at |b| > 30 degrees.
The conclusion that no BLAPs exist at high latitudes follows only if the parent search did not miss fainter, lower-amplitude, or shorter-period objects; see Section 1 and Section 5.
domain assumption The model atmosphere grids and fitting codes of Irrgang et al. (2018) and Heber et al. (2018) are valid for these stars and yield unbiased atmospheric parameters.
All quoted effective temperatures, surface gravities, and helium abundances come from these fits, with no independent cross-check presented; see Section 4.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectroscopic Observations of Four Candidates for Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators. No BLAPs at High Galactic Latitudes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YTYL7IDY

@misc{pith2026250708372,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectroscopic Observations of Four Candidates for Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators. No BLAPs at High Galactic Latitudes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YTYL7IDY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08372}
}

abstract

We have obtained spectroscopic observations for four short-period variable objects detected in ZTF, Gaia, and Pan-STARRS (ZGP) data and classified as Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators (BLAPs) in McWhirter and Lam (2022): ZGP-BLAP-03, ZGP-BLAP-04, ZGP-BLAP-10, and ZGP-BLAP-15. The variables have periods between 46 and 56 min, full amplitudes of 0.13-0.22 mag in the $r$ band, and light curve shapes typical for radially pulsating stars. Three of them were found at high galactic latitudes (|$b$|>30 deg). We have identified object ZGP-BLAP-03 as an early F-type star, while objects ZGP-BLAP-04 and ZGP-BLAP-15 as low-metallicity late A-type stars. These are the three objects found at high galactic latitudes and located several kiloparsecs from the Sun. Thus, they are SX Phoenicis-type variable stars residing in the Galactic halo. In the case of low-latitude object ZGP-BLAP-10, we report the presence of helium lines in its spectrum and atmospheric parameters in agreement with known BLAPs. This and other results indicate that BLAPs are absent in metal-poor environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08372 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Phase-folded light curves in the ZTF r-band of the investigated variable stars. 3 Spectroscopic Observations We obtained moderate-resolution spectra of the four BLAP candidates using the Magellan Echellete (MagE) Spectrograph attached to the 6.5-m Magellan/Baade telescope located at Las Campanas Observatory (LCO), Chile. LCO is operated by the Carnegie Institution for Science. The observations were carried out in … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Color-magnitude diagrams with the positions of the i [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** MagE/Magellan spectra of the investigated variable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Left panel: Composite model fit to the normalized spectrum of ZGP-BLAP-10 (black line). The model for the hot component is shown in blue, the contribution of sunlight is plotted in dark red, and the combined model in strong red. Right panel: Uncertainty-weighted residu…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Top panel: SED fit for object ZGP-BLAP-10. The uvgri-band measurements (green points) were taken from the SkyMapper Southern Survey (SMSS) DR4 (Onken et al. 2024), grizy-band measurements (dark red points) from the Pan-STARRS1 survey DR2 (Chambers et al. 2016), g-band …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

[1]

C., Kulkarni, S

Bellm E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, P.A.S.P., 131, 018002. Borowicz, J., Pietrukowicz, P., Mr´ oz, P.,et al. 2023a, Acta Astron., 73,

work page 2019
[5]

Jeﬀery, C. S. 2025, MNRAS, 538,

work page 2025
[21]

2022, Astron

Pigulski, A., Kotysz, K., and Ko/suppress laczek-Szyma´ nski, P.A. 2022, Astron. Astrophys., 663, A62. Pigulski, A., Ko/suppress laczek-Szyma´ nski, P. A.,´Swi¸ ech, M., /suppress Lojko, P., and Kowalski, K. J. 2024, Astron. Astrophys., 691, A343. Ramsay G., Woudt, P. A., Kupfer, T. et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513,

work page 2022
[28]

2018, MNRAS, 478,

Wu, T., and Li, Y. 2018, MNRAS, 478,

work page 2018
[35]

A., Templeton, M., Terrell, D., Smith, T

Henden, A. A., Templeton, M., Terrell, D., Smith, T. C., Levi ne, S., and Welch, D. 2016, , , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/336. Holdsworth, D. L., Smalley, B., Gillon, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439,

work page 2016
[61]

A., Mr´ oz, P.,et al

Pietrukowicz, P., Dziembowski, W. A., Mr´ oz, P.,et al. 2013, Acta Astron., 63,

work page 2013
[69]

K., and Szyma´ nski, G

Udalski, A., Szyma´ nski, M. K., and Szyma´ nski, G. 2015,Acta Astron., 65,

work page 2015
[100]

J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., and Bedding, T

Murphy, S. J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., and Bedding, T. R. 2019, MNRAS, 485,

work page 2019

Show all 29 references

[103]

J., Finkbeiner, D

Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., and Davis, M. 1998, Astrophys. J., 500,

1998
[161]

2025, Astrophys

Pietrukowicz, P., Latour, M., Soszy´ nski, I.,et al. 2025, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. , 279,

2025
[166]

The RR Lyrae 2017 Conference. Revival of the Classical P ulsators: from Galactic Structure to Stellar Interior Diagnostics

Pietrukowicz, P. 2018,in: “The RR Lyrae 2017 Conference. Revival of the Classical P ulsators: from Galactic Structure to Stellar Interior Diagnostics” , ,

2018
[189]

K., Soszy´ nski, I., and Poleski, R

Udalski, A., Szyma´ nski, M. K., Soszy´ nski, I., and Poleski, R. 2008, Acta Astron., 58,

2008
[232]

M., Stanway, E

Byrne, C. M., Stanway, E. R., and Eldridge, J. J. 2021, MNRAS, 507,

2021
[241]

2022, Astron

Pietrukowicz, P., Ratajczak, M., Soszy´ nski, I.et al. 2022, Astron. Astrophys., 72,

2022
[258]

2020, Astron

Pietrukowicz, P., Soszy´ nski, I., Netzel, H.et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 70,

2020
[265]

2024, Acta Astron., 74,

Borowicz, J., Pietrukowicz, P., Skowron, J., et al. 2024, Acta Astron., 74, . Bradshaw, C., Dorsch, M., Kupfer, T., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 10239. Byrne, C. M., and Jeﬀery, C. S. 2018, MNRAS, 481,

2024
[379]

A., Latour, M., et al

Pietrukowicz, P., Dziembowski, W. A., Latour, M., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1,

2017
[525]

1996, Astrophys

Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1996, Astrophys. J., 460, L107. Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, Astron. J., 131,

1996
[621]

C., Magnier, E

Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, , , arXiv:1612.05560. Chang S.-W., Wolf, C., Onken, C. A., and Bessell, M. S. 2024, MNRAS, 529,

2016 arXiv
[1163]

2021, Acta Astron., 71,

Soszy´ nski, I., Pietrukowicz, P., Skowron, J.,et al. 2021, Acta Astron., 71,

2021
[1414]

Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2018, Astron. Astrophys., 616, A1. Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 649, A1. Heber, U., Irrgang, A., and Schaﬀenroth, J. 2018, Open Astronomy, 27,

2018
[2078]

2018, Astron

Irrgang, A., Kreuzer, S., Heber, U., and Brown, W. 2018, Astron. Astrophys., 615L,

2018
[2172]

A., Schlaﬂy, E

Magnier, E. A., Schlaﬂy, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2020, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. , 251,

2020
[2215]

D., C´ orsico, A

Romero, A. D., C´ orsico, A. H., Althaus, L. G., Pelisoli, I., and Kepler, S. O. 2018, MNRAS, 477, L30. Schlaﬂy, E. F., and Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, Astrophys. J., 737,

2018
[2380]

A., Wolf, C., Bessell, M

Onken, C. A., Wolf, C., Bessell, M. S., et al. 2024, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 41,

2024
[2952]

B., Burdge, K

Kupfer, T., Bauer, E. B., Burdge, K. B., et al. 2019, Astrophys. J., 878, L35. Lin, J., Wang, X., Mo, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523,

2019
[3810]

M., and Jeﬀery, C

Byrne, C. M., and Jeﬀery, C. S. 2020, MNRAS, 492,

2020
[3871]

2022, Astron

Xiong H., Casagrande, L., Chen, X., et al. 2022, Astron. Astrophys., 668, A112. Zhang, X., Jeﬀery, C. S., Su, J., and Bi, S. 2023, Astrophys. J., 959, 24

2022
[4971]

2020, Astrophys

Meng, X.-C., Han, Z.-W., Podsiadlowski, P., and Li, J. 2020, Astrophys. J., 903,

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

C., Kulkarni, S

Bellm E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, P.A.S.P., 131, 018002. Borowicz, J., Pietrukowicz, P., Mr´ oz, P.,et al. 2023a, Acta Astron., 73,

work page 2019

[2] [5]

Jeﬀery, C. S. 2025, MNRAS, 538,

work page 2025

[3] [21]

2022, Astron

Pigulski, A., Kotysz, K., and Ko/suppress laczek-Szyma´ nski, P.A. 2022, Astron. Astrophys., 663, A62. Pigulski, A., Ko/suppress laczek-Szyma´ nski, P. A.,´Swi¸ ech, M., /suppress Lojko, P., and Kowalski, K. J. 2024, Astron. Astrophys., 691, A343. Ramsay G., Woudt, P. A., Kupfer, T. et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513,

work page 2022

[4] [28]

2018, MNRAS, 478,

Wu, T., and Li, Y. 2018, MNRAS, 478,

work page 2018

[5] [35]

A., Templeton, M., Terrell, D., Smith, T

Henden, A. A., Templeton, M., Terrell, D., Smith, T. C., Levi ne, S., and Welch, D. 2016, , , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/336. Holdsworth, D. L., Smalley, B., Gillon, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439,

work page 2016

[6] [61]

A., Mr´ oz, P.,et al

Pietrukowicz, P., Dziembowski, W. A., Mr´ oz, P.,et al. 2013, Acta Astron., 63,

work page 2013

[7] [69]

K., and Szyma´ nski, G

Udalski, A., Szyma´ nski, M. K., and Szyma´ nski, G. 2015,Acta Astron., 65,

work page 2015

[8] [100]

J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., and Bedding, T

Murphy, S. J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., and Bedding, T. R. 2019, MNRAS, 485,

work page 2019