pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19903 · v1 · pith:YWXSOUIJnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.GA· physics.geo-ph

New NanoSIMS Multielement Isotope Data Reveal CO Novae As Key Sources Of 13C-rich Presolar Silicon Carbide Grains

Jordi Jos\'e , Nan Liu , Conel M. O'D. Alexander , Jianhua Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 01:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAphysics.geo-ph
keywords presolar silicon carbideCO novaeisotopic ratiosNanoSIMSMurchison meteoriteAB grainsstellar nucleosynthesisnova models
0
0 comments X

The pith

CO novae from low- to intermediate-mass white dwarfs best match the multielement isotope data of 13C-rich presolar SiC grains lacking s-process signatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports new NanoSIMS measurements of carbon, nitrogen, silicon, magnesium-aluminum, titanium, and nickel isotopes in four putative nova SiC grains and 79 AB SiC grains from the Murchison meteorite. These improved data are compared to an expanded suite of hydrodynamic models for CO, ONe, and recurrent novae across a range of white-dwarf masses and pre-enrichment levels. CO nova models on 0.6 to 1.0 solar-mass white dwarfs give the closest overall fit when all isotope systems are considered together. This matters because it identifies a concrete stellar source for a small but distinct population of presolar grains that reached the early solar system. If the match holds, it supplies a model-anchored way to estimate how much nova dust entered the interstellar medium.

Core claim

When all isotopic systems are considered together (C, N, Mg-Al, Si, Ti, and Ni), the CO nova models provide the closest and most self-consistent match to both the putative nova grains and the subset of AB grains lacking s-process signatures. CO novae of low- to intermediate-mass naturally reproduce the observed 14N/15N-26Al/27Al trend, the Si isotope compositions of AB grains which dominantly reflect Galactic chemical evolution (GCE), and the mild Si isotope shifts in putative nova grains relative to the GCE trend defined by AB grains. In contrast, ONe and recurrent nova models fail multiple isotopic constraints simultaneously.

What carries the argument

Expanded suite of hydrodynamic CO, ONe, and recurrent nova models spanning white-dwarf masses and pre-enrichment parameters, used to interpret the full set of C, N, Mg-Al, Si, Ti, and Ni isotope ratios measured by NanoSIMS in the grains.

If this is right

  • Low- to intermediate-mass CO novae (0.6-1.0 solar masses) are the most plausible sources for the 1-2 percent of presolar SiC grains that are 13C-rich and lack s-process signatures.
  • A multielement, model-anchored framework is now available for estimating the total nova contribution to interstellar dust.
  • ONe and recurrent nova models can be set aside as primary sources for these particular grains because they fail several isotopic constraints at once.
  • The Si isotope compositions in the AB grains mainly trace Galactic chemical evolution, while the putative nova grains show only small additional shifts produced by CO novae.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same multielement approach could be extended to other classes of presolar grains to test whether additional nova contributions have been overlooked.
  • If the CO nova identification is correct, it implies that dust from these events survives long enough to be incorporated into new star-forming regions at measurable levels.
  • Future high-precision measurements of titanium or nickel isotopes in larger samples of AB grains could further separate the nova component from the dominant Galactic chemical evolution trend.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen hydrodynamic nova models with their white-dwarf masses and pre-enrichment parameters accurately capture the nucleosynthesis and mixing that produce the observed isotopic ratios in the grains.

What would settle it

New grains or refined models showing that the mild Si isotope shifts or the 14N/15N-26Al/27Al trend in the 13C-rich grains deviate systematically from the pattern predicted by the low- to intermediate-mass CO nova calculations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19903 by Conel M. O'D. Alexander, Jianhua Wang, Jordi Jos\'e, Nan Liu.

Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Carbon, N, and Si isotopic ratios. Nova grains and selected AB grains without obvious s-process enrichments (δ50Ti48 <50‰ and without any significant 60Ni excesses; highlighted with * in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plots of 26Al/27Al versus 14N/15N and 12C/13C. The same set of grains as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present new multielement NanoSIMS isotopic measurements (C, N, Si, Mg-Al, Ti, and Ni) for four putative nova SiC grains and 79 AB SiC grains from the Murchison meteorite to reassess their stellar origins. High-resolution imaging and a revised Mg/Al relative sensitivity factor for SiC yield substantially improved 26Al/27Al ratios and the most reliable multielement characterization to date for 13C-rich presolar SiC grains. To interpret these data, we computed an expanded suite of hydrodynamic CO, ONe, and recurrent nova models spanning a range of white-dwarf masses and pre-enrichment parameters. When all isotopic systems are considered together (C, N, Mg-Al, Si, Ti, and Ni), the CO nova models provide the closest and most self-consistent match to both the putative nova grains and the subset of AB grains lacking s-process signatures. CO novae of low- to intermediate-mass naturally reproduce the observed 14N/15N-26Al/27Al trend, the Si isotope compositions of AB grains which dominantly reflect Galactic chemical evolution (GCE), and the mild Si isotope shifts in putative nova grains relative to the GCE trend defined by AB grains. In contrast, ONe and recurrent nova models fail multiple isotopic constraints simultaneously. These results demonstrate that low- to intermediate-mass CO novae (0.6-1.0 Msun) are the most plausible stellar sources of 13C-rich SiC dust lacking s-process signatures (1-2\% of all presolar SiC), and they establish a multielement, model-anchored framework for quantifying nova contributions to the dust reservoir in the interstellar medium.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports new NanoSIMS multielement isotopic data (C, N, Si, Mg-Al, Ti, Ni) for four putative nova SiC grains and 79 AB SiC grains from Murchison. High-resolution imaging and a revised Mg/Al sensitivity factor improve the 26Al/27Al ratios. An expanded grid of hydrodynamic CO, ONe, and recurrent nova models is computed across white-dwarf masses and pre-enrichment parameters. The central claim is that low- to intermediate-mass CO novae (0.6-1.0 Msun) provide the closest and most self-consistent match to the 13C-rich grains lacking s-process signatures when all isotopic systems are considered together, while ONe and recurrent models fail multiple constraints simultaneously. This positions CO novae as the primary sources for 1-2% of presolar SiC and supplies a model-anchored framework for nova dust contributions to the ISM.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the work identifies a previously under-appreciated stellar source for 13C-rich presolar SiC and quantifies nova contributions to the interstellar dust reservoir. The multielement data set and expanded model grid represent a clear advance over prior single-isotope studies. Explicit use of the AB-grain GCE trend as an external benchmark is a methodological strength that helps anchor the interpretation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Nova Model Calculations] The central claim that CO nova models (0.6-1.0 Msun with chosen pre-enrichment) provide the closest self-consistent match rests on the assumption that the hydrodynamic nucleosynthesis and mixing accurately reproduce the observed ratios. The manuscript does not compare the selected white-dwarf masses or pre-enrichment fractions against independent constraints from nova spectroscopy, light-curve energetics, or observed elemental abundances, leaving open the possibility that the parameters are effectively tuned to the grain data.
  2. [Data Analysis and Model Comparison] Error propagation across the full suite of isotopic systems (C, N, Mg-Al, Si, Ti, Ni) is not presented. Without a quantitative combined uncertainty treatment, the statistical significance of the claimed 'closest and most self-consistent match' cannot be evaluated rigorously.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from explicitly stating the total number of grains measured and the quantitative improvement in 26Al/27Al precision achieved by the revised sensitivity factor.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should consistently indicate whether model predictions include uncertainties or are shown as point values only.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Nova Model Calculations] The central claim that CO nova models (0.6-1.0 Msun with chosen pre-enrichment) provide the closest self-consistent match rests on the assumption that the hydrodynamic nucleosynthesis and mixing accurately reproduce the observed ratios. The manuscript does not compare the selected white-dwarf masses or pre-enrichment fractions against independent constraints from nova spectroscopy, light-curve energetics, or observed elemental abundances, leaving open the possibility that the parameters are effectively tuned to the grain data.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of explicitly linking model parameters to independent observational constraints. The white-dwarf masses and pre-enrichment fractions in our grid were drawn from the range explored in prior hydrodynamic nova studies, but the manuscript did not include a direct comparison. In the revised version we have added a new paragraph in Section 2 that references observed white-dwarf masses in CO novae from spectroscopy and light-curve analyses, as well as typical mixing fractions inferred from elemental abundance studies. This addition demonstrates consistency with external data while preserving the exploratory nature of the grid. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Data Analysis and Model Comparison] Error propagation across the full suite of isotopic systems (C, N, Mg-Al, Si, Ti, Ni) is not presented. Without a quantitative combined uncertainty treatment, the statistical significance of the claimed 'closest and most self-consistent match' cannot be evaluated rigorously.

    Authors: We agree that a formal multi-isotope uncertainty treatment would strengthen the quantitative basis for model ranking. Because the isotopic systems have heterogeneous measurement precisions and possible systematic offsets, constructing a single combined metric requires additional assumptions that we did not introduce. In the revision we have expanded the discussion of model-data comparison to include explicit reference to the reported uncertainties on each ratio and have added a supplementary figure that overlays model predictions with data points and their 1-sigma error bars for the principal isotopic planes. This provides a clearer visual and semi-quantitative assessment of self-consistency. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents new NanoSIMS multielement isotopic data for presolar SiC grains and compares them against an expanded grid of hydrodynamic CO, ONe, and recurrent nova models computed across a range of white-dwarf masses and pre-enrichment parameters. The central conclusion—that low- to intermediate-mass CO novae provide the closest self-consistent match—is reached by direct multi-isotope comparison, with the GCE trend in Si isotopes from AB grains serving as an external benchmark rather than a fitted input. No load-bearing step reduces to self-definition, parameter fitting renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain that lacks independent verification; the analysis remains a standard model-grid exploration against observational constraints.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of nova nucleosynthesis modeling and on the interpretation that the measured grains are uncontaminated presolar material. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • White-dwarf mass and pre-enrichment parameters
    Chosen across a range to generate the model grid; specific values are tuned to match observed isotopic trends.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Hydrodynamic nova models with standard nuclear reaction rates accurately predict isotopic yields for C, N, Si, Mg-Al, Ti, and Ni.
    Invoked when comparing model outputs to grain data in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The revised Mg/Al relative sensitivity factor for SiC is accurate and does not introduce systematic bias in 26Al/27Al ratios.
    Stated as yielding substantially improved ratios.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5879 in / 1449 out tokens · 36313 ms · 2026-05-20T01:41:20.668948+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Starrfield, C

    S. Starrfield, C. Iliadis, and W.R. Hix, Thermonuclear processes, in Classical Novae (Ed. M.F. Bode and A. Evans (Exec., 77-101 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511536168.006

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511536168.006 2008

  2. [2]

    Starrfield, C

    S. Starrfield, C. Iliadis, and W.R. Hix, The thermonuclear runaway and the classical nova outburst. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 128, 051001 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/1538- 3873/128/963/051001

    work page doi:10.1088/1538- 2016

  3. [3]

    José and S.N

    J. José and S.N. Shore, Observational mysteries and theoretical challenges for abundance studies, in Classical Novae (Ed. M.F. Bode and A. Evans (Exec., 121 -149 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511536168.008

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511536168.008 2008

  4. [4]

    José, Stellar explosions: Hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis

    J. José, Stellar explosions: Hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis . Boca Raton: CRC Press. (2016) https://doi.org/10.1201/b19165

    work page doi:10.1201/b19165 2016

  5. [5]

    C homiuk, B.D

    L. C homiuk, B.D. Metzger, and K.J. Shen, New insights into classical novae. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59, 391-444 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-114502

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-114502 2021

  6. [6]

    Shafte r, The Galactic nova rate revisited

    A.W. Shafte r, The Galactic nova rate revisited . Astrophys. J. 834, 196 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/196

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/196 2017

  7. [7]

    Jha, Type Iax supernovae, in Handbook of Supernovae (Ed

    S.W. Jha, Type Iax supernovae, in Handbook of Supernovae (Ed. A.W. Alsabti and P. Murdin (Exec., 375 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_42

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_42 2017

  8. [8]

    José and M

    J. José and M. Hernanz, Hydrodynamic simulations of the recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis: Nucleosynthesis predictions. Astron. Astrophys. 698, A251 (2025) 31 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202553762

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553762 2025

  9. [9]

    Starrfield, M

    S. Starrfield, M. Bose, C.E. Woodward, et al., Hydrodynamic predictions for the next outburst of T Coronae Borealis: It will be the brightest classical or recurrent nova ever observed in X- rays. Astrophys. J. 982, 89 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb8ed

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb8ed 2025

  10. [10]

    Sparks, S

    W.M. Sparks, S. Starrfield, and J.W. Truran, A hydrodynamic study of a slow nova outburst . Astrophys. J. 220, 1063-1075 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1086/155992

    work page doi:10.1086/155992 1978

  11. [11]

    Prialnik, M.M

    D. Prialnik, M.M. Shara, and G. Shaviv, The evolution of a slow nova model with a Z = 0.03 envelope from pre-explosion to extinction. Astron. Astrophys. 62, 339-348 (1978)

    work page 1978

  12. [12]

    Starrfield, J.W

    S. Starrfield, J.W. Truran, W.M. Sparks, and G.S. Kutter, CNO abundances and hydrodynamic models of the nova outburst. Astrophys. J. 176, 169 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1086/151619

    work page doi:10.1086/151619 1972

  13. [13]

    Starrfield, J.W

    S. Starrfield, J.W. Truran, and W.M. Sparks, CNO abundances and hydrodynamic studies of the nova outburst. V. 1.00 M sun models with small mass envelopes . Astrophys. J. 226, 186- 202 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1086/156598

    work page doi:10.1086/156598 1978

  14. [14]

    Livio and J.W

    M. Livio and J.W. Truran, Elemental mixing in classical nova systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 617, 126-137 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749- 6632.1990.tb37801.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1749- 1990

  15. [15]

    Rosner, A

    R. Rosner, A. Alexakis, Y.-N. Young, J.W. Truran, and W. Hillebrandt, On the C/O enrichment of nova ejecta. Astrophys. J. 562, L177-L179 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/338327

    work page doi:10.1086/338327 2001

  16. [16]

    Alexakis, A.C

    A. Alexakis, A.C. Calder, A. Heger, et al., On heavy element enrichment in classical novae . Astrophys. J. 602, 931-937 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1086/381086

    work page doi:10.1086/381086 2004

  17. [17]

    Casanova, J

    J. Casanova, J. José, E. García-Berro, S.N. Shore, and A.C. Calder, Kelvin -Helmholtz instabilities as the source of inhomogeneous mixing in nova explosions . Nature 478, 490-492 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10520

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10520 2011

  18. [18]

    Casanova, J

    J. Casanova, J. José, E. García -Berro, and S.N. Shore, Three -dimensional simulations of turbulent convective mixing in ONe and CO classical nova explosions. Astron. Astrophys. 595, A28 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628707

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628707 2016

  19. [19]

    José, S.N

    J. José, S.N. Shore, and J. Casanova, 123 -321 models of classical novae. Astron. Astrophys. 634, A5 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936893

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936893 2020

  20. [20]

    Evans, Y.V

    A. Evans, Y.V. Pavlenko, D.P.K. Banerjee, et al., Gas phase SiO in the circumstellar environment of the recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis . Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 3498- 3505 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1071

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1071 2019

  21. [21]

    Evans, D.P.K

    A. Evans, D.P.K. Banerjee, T.R. Geballe, et al., Near -infrared spectroscopy of the LMC recurrent nova LMCN 1968- 12a. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 536, 1710 -1717 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2711

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2711 1968

  22. [22]

    Pavlenko, A

    Y.V. Pavlenko, A. Evans, D.P.K. Banerjee, et al., Isotopic ratios in the red giant component of the recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 498, 4853 -4863 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2658

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2658 2020

  23. [23]

    Liu, Presolar grains, in Treatiese on Geochemistry (Third Edition) (Exec

    N. Liu, Presolar grains, in Treatiese on Geochemistry (Third Edition) (Exec. Elsevier (2024) https://doi.org/https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14694

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    P.R. Heck, J. Greer, L. Kööp, et al., Lifetimes of interstellar dust from cosmic ray exposure ages of presolar silicon carbide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 117, 1884- 1889 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904573117

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1904573117 2020

  25. [25]

    Amari, X

    S. Amari, X. Gao, L.R. Nittler, et al., Presolar grains from novae. Astrophys. J. 551, 1065-1072 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/320235

    work page doi:10.1086/320235 2001

  26. [26]

    Gyngard, E

    F. Gyngard, E. Zinner, L.R. Nittler, et al., Automated NanoSIMS measurements of spinel stardust from the Murray meteorite . Astrophys. J. 717, 107 -120 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/717/1/107

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/1/107 2010

  27. [27]

    Nguyen and S

    A.N. Nguyen and S. Messenger, Resolving the stellar sources of isotopically rare presolar silicate grains through Mg and Fe isotopic analyses. Astrophys. J. 784, 149 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/784/2/149

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/2/149 2014

  28. [28]

    Haenecour, J.Y

    P. Haenecour, J.Y. Howe, T.J. Zega, et al., Laboratory evidence for co-condensed oxygen- and carbon-rich meteoritic stardust from nova outbursts . Nat. Astron. 3, 626 -630 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0757-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0757-4 2019

  29. [29]

    Amari, L.R

    S. Amari, L.R. Nittler, E. Zinner, K. Lodders, and R.S. Lewis, Presolar SiC grains of type A and B: their isotopic compositions and st ellar origins . Astrophys. J. 559, 463 -483 (2001) 32 https://doi.org/10.1086/322397

    work page doi:10.1086/322397 2001

  30. [30]

    Bose and S

    M. Bose and S. Starrfield, Condensation of SiC stardust in CO nova outbursts . Astrophys. J. 873, 14 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aafc2f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafc2f 2019

  31. [31]

    Liu, L.R

    N. Liu, L.R. Nittler, M. Pignatari, C.M.O’D. Alexander, and J. Wang, Stellar origin of 15N-rich presolar SiC grains of type AB: supernovae with explosive hydrogen burning. Astrophys. J. Lett. 842, L1 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa74e5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa74e5 2017

  32. [32]

    Lodders and B

    K. Lodders and B. Fegley, Jr., The origin of circumstellar silicon carbide grains found in meteorites. Meteoritics 30, 661 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1995.tb01164.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.1995.tb01164.x 1995

  33. [33]

    Nittler and P

    L.R. Nittler and P. Hoppe, Are presolar silicon carbide grains from novae actually from supernovae? Astrophys. J. Lett. 631, L89-L92 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1086/497029

    work page doi:10.1086/497029 2005

  34. [34]

    Liu, L.R

    N. Liu, L.R. Nittler, C.M.O’D. Alexander, et al., Stellar origins of extremely 13C- and 15N- enriched presolar SiC grains: novae or supernovae? Astrophys. J. 820, 140 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/140

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/140 2016

  35. [35]

    Iliadis, L.N

    C. Iliadis, L.N. Downen, J. José, L.R. Nittler, and S. Starrfield, On presolar stardust grains from CO classical novae. Astrophys. J. 855, 76 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaabb6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaabb6 2018

  36. [36]

    Barzyk, M.R

    J.G. Barzyk, M.R. Savina, A.M. Davis, et al., Constraining the 13C neutron source in AGB stars through isotopic analysis of trace elements in presolar SiC . Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 42, 1103- 1119 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb00563.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb00563.x 2007

  37. [37]

    Nittler, C.M.O’D

    L.R. Nittler, C.M.O’D. Alexander, R. Gallino, et al., Aluminum -, calcium- and titanium-rich oxide stardust in ordinary chondrite meteorites . Astrophys. J. 682, 1450-1478 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1086/589430

    work page doi:10.1086/589430 2008

  38. [38]

    Amari, E

    S. Amari, E. Zinner, and R. Gallino, Presolar grap hite from the Murchison meteorite: an isotopic study . Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 133, 479-522 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.006 2014

  39. [39]

    and Haenecour, P

    C. Floss and P. Haenecour, Presolar silicate grains: abundances, isotopic and elemental compositions, and the effects of secondary processing . Geochemical Journal 50, 3-25 (2016) https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.2.0377

    work page doi:10.2343/geochemj.2.0377 2016

  40. [40]

    N. Liu, J. Barosch, L.R. Nittler, et al., New multielement isotopic compositions of presolar SiC grains: implications for their stellar origins . Astrophys. J. Lett. 920, L26 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac260b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac260b 2021

  41. [41]

    Boujibar, S

    A. Boujibar, S. Howell, S. Zhang, et al., Cluster analysis of presolar silicon carbide grains: evaluation of their classification and astrophysical implications . Astrophys. J. Lett. 907, L39 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abd102

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abd102 2021

  42. [42]

    Hystad, A

    G. Hystad, A. Boujibar, N. Liu, L.R. Nittler, and R.M. Hazen, Evaluation of the classification of pre-solar silicon carbide grains using consensus clustering with resampling methods: An assessment of the conf idence of grain assignments. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 334-350 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3478

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3478 2022

  43. [43]

    J. José, M. Hernanz, and C. Iliadis, Nucleosynthesis in classical novae. Nucl. Phys. A 777, 550- 578 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.121

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.121 2006

  44. [44]

    Hernanz, Gamma-rays from classical novae, in Classical Novae (Ed

    M. Hernanz, Gamma-rays from classical novae, in Classical Novae (Ed. M.F. Bode and A. Evans (Exec., 252-284 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511536168.013

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511536168.013 2008

  45. [45]

    J. José, M. Hernanz, and A. Coc, New results on 26Al production in classical novae. Astrophys. J. 479, L55-L58 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1086/310575

    work page doi:10.1086/310575 1997

  46. [46]

    José and M

    J. José and M. Hernanz, Nucleosynthesis in classical novae: CO versus ONe white dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 494, 680-690 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1086/305244

    work page doi:10.1086/305244 1998

  47. [47]

    N. Liu, T. Stephan, P. Boehnke, et al., J -type carbon stars: a dominant source of 14N-rich presolar SiC grains of type AB . Astrophys. J. Lett. 844, L12 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa7d4c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7d4c 2017

  48. [48]

    Amari, A

    S. Amari, A. Anders, A. Virag, and E. Zinner, Interstellar graphite in meteorites . Nature 345, 238-240 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1038/345238a0

    work page doi:10.1038/345238a0 1990

  49. [49]

    Clayton, 22Na, Ne-E, extinct radioactive anomalies and unsupported 40Ar

    D.D. Clayton, 22Na, Ne-E, extinct radioactive anomalies and unsupported 40Ar. Nature 257, 36- 37 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1038/257036b0

    work page doi:10.1038/257036b0 1975

  50. [50]

    Amari, On the origin of 22Na in Ne -E(L)

    S. Amari, On the origin of 22Na in Ne -E(L). Meteoritics and Planetary Science Supplement 43, 5271 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Pignatari, S

    M. Pignatari, S. Amari, P. Hoppe, et al., Production of radioactive 22Na in core-collapse 33 supernovae: The Ne-E(L) component in presolar grains and its possible consequences on supernova observations . Astrophys. J. 990, 19 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538 - 4357/adef4c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538 2025

  52. [52]

    Rauscher, A

    T. Rauscher, A. Heger, R.D. Hoffman, and S.E. Woosley, Nucleosynthesis in massive stars with improved nuclear and stellar physics. Astrophys. J. 576, 323 -348 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1086/341728

    work page doi:10.1086/341728 2002

  53. [53]

    Pignatari, E

    M. Pignatari, E. Zinner, P. Hoppe, et al., Carbon -rich presolar grains from massive stars: subsolar 12C/13C and 14N/15N Ratios and the Mystery of 15N. Astrophys. J. 808, L43 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/l43

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/l43 2015

  54. [54]

    N. Liu, T. Stephan, P. Boehnke, et al., Common occurrence of explosive hydrogen burning in Type II supernovae. Astrophys. J. 855, 144 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaab4e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaab4e 2018

  55. [55]

    Hoppe, M

    P. Hoppe, M. Pignatari, J. Kodolányi, E. Gröner, and S. Amari, NanoSIMS isotope studies of rare types of presolar silicon carbide grains from the Murchison meteorite: Implications for supernova models and the role of 14C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 221, 182 -199 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.01.051

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2017.01.051 2018

  56. [56]

    Sallaska, C

    A.L. Sallaska, C. Iliadis, A.E. Champange, et al., STARLIB: A next-generation reaction -rate library for nuclear astrophysics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 207, 18 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/207/1/18

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/207/1/18 2013

  57. [57]

    Lodders, H

    K. Lodders, H. Palme, and H.-P. Gail, Abundances of the elements in the solar system. Landolt Börnstein 4B, 712 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88055-4_34

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88055-4_34 2009

  58. [58]

    José, G.M

    J. José, G.M. Halabi, and M.F. El Eid, Synthesis of C -rich dust in CO nova outbursts. Astron. Astrophys. 593, A54 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628901

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628901 2016

  59. [59]

    J. José, M. Hernanz, S. Amari, K. Lodders, and E. Zinner, The imprint of nova nucleosynthesis in presolar grains. Astrophys. J. 612, 414-428 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1086/422569

    work page doi:10.1086/422569 2004

  60. [60]

    1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X

    E. Anders and N. Grevesse, Abundances of the elements: meteoritic and solar . Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 197-214 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x

    work page doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x 1989

  61. [61]

    Hoppe, J

    P. Hoppe, J. Leitner, M. Pignatari, and S. Amari, New Constraints for Supernova Models from Presolar Silicon C arbide X Grains with Very High 26Al/27Al Ratios. Astrophys. J. Lett. 943, L22 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acb157

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb157 2023

  62. [62]

    Liu, C.M.O’D

    N. Liu, C.M.O’D. Alexander, B.S. Meyer, et al., Explosive nucleosynthesis in core-collapse Type II supernovae: Insights from new C, N, Si, and Al -Mg isotopic compositions of presolar grains. Astrophys. J. Lett. 961, L22 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad18c7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad18c7 2024

  63. [63]

    N. Liu, N. Dauphas, S. Cristallo, S. Palmerini, and M. Busso, Oxygen and aluminum - magnesium isotopic systematics of presolar nanospinel grains from CI chondrite Orgueil . Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 319, 296-317 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2021.11.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2021.11.022 2022

  64. [64]

    J. José, A. Coc, and M. Hernanz, Nuclear uncertainties in the NeNa-MgAl cycles and production of 22Na and 26Al during nova outbursts . Astrophys. J. 520, 347-360 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1086/307445

    work page doi:10.1086/307445 1999

  65. [65]

    J. José, A. Coc, and M. Hernanz, Synthesis of intermediate- mass elements in classical novae: From Si to Ca. Astrophys. J. 560, 897-906 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/322979

    work page doi:10.1086/322979 2001

  66. [66]

    2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 272, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad8bba

    J. Schneider, When will the next T CrB eruption occur? Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 8, 272 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/ad8bba

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad8bba 2024

  67. [67]

    B.E. Schaefer, The B & V light curves for recurrent nova T CrB from 1842-2022, the unique pre- and post-eruption high-states, the complex period changes, and the upcoming eruption in 2025.5 ± 1.3. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524, 3146-3165 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad735

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad735 2022

  68. [68]

    Nittler and C.M.O’D

    L.R. Nittler and C.M.O’D. Alexander, Automated isotopic measurements of micron-sized dust: application to meteoritic presolar silicon carbide . Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 4961-4980 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(03)00485-x

    work page doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(03)00485-x 2003

  69. [69]

    N. Liu, A. Steele, L.R. Nittler, et al., Coordinated EDX and micro-Raman analysis of presolar silicon carbide: A novel, nondestructive method to identify rare subgroup SiC. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 52, 2550-2569 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.12954

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.12954 2017

  70. [70]

    Liu, C.M.O’D

    N. Liu, C.M.O’D. Alexander, J. Wang, S. Cristallo, and D. Vescovi. Stellar origins of types Y and Z silicon carbide grains revealed by nickel isotopes. in 56th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. The Woodlands, Texas, #2188 (2025). 34

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Stephan, R

    T. Stephan, R. Trappitsch, P. Hoppe, et al., The presolar grain database. I. Silicon carbide . Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 270, 27 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ad1102

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad1102 2024

  72. [72]

    Stephan and R

    T. Stephan and R. Trappitsch, Reliable uncertainties: Error correlation, rotated error bars, and linear regressions in three-isotope plots and beyond. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 491, 117053 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2023.117053

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2023.117053 2023

  73. [73]

    Nguyen, L.R

    A.N. Nguyen, L.R. Nittler, C.M.O’D. Alexander, and P. Hoppe, Titanium isotopic compositions of rare presolar SiC grain types from the Murchison meteorite . Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 221, 162-181 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.02.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2017.02.026 2018

  74. [74]

    Lugaro, B

    M. Lugaro, B. Cseh, B. Világos, et al., Origin of large meteoritic SiC stardust grains in metal- rich AGB stars. Astrophys. J. 898, 96 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9e74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9e74 2020

  75. [75]

    Astrophys.,670, A20

    S. Cristallo, A. Nanni, G. Cescutti, et al., Mass and metallicity distribution of parent AGB stars of presolar SiC . Astron. Astrophys. 644, A8 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004- 6361/202039492

    work page doi:10.1051/0004- 2020

  76. [76]

    N. Liu, T. Stephan, S. Cristallo, et al., Presolar silicon carbide grains of types Y and Z: their molybdenum isotopic compositions and stellar origins . Astrophys. J. 881, 28 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2d27

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2d27 2019

  77. [77]

    N. Liu, M. Lugaro, J. Leitner, B.S. Meyer, and M. Schönbächler, Presolar grains as probes of supernova nucleosynthesis . Space Sci. Rev. 220, 88 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214- 024-01122-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214- 2024

  78. [78]

    Zinner, S

    E. Zinner, S. Amari, R. Guinness, et al., NanoSIMS isotopic analysis of small presolar grains: Search for Si3N4 grains from AGB stars and Al and Ti isotopic compositions of rare presolar SiC grains . Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 4786-4813 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.07.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2007.07.012 2007

  79. [79]

    Gyngard, S

    F. Gyngard, S. Am ari, E. Zinner, and K.K. Marhas, Correlated silicon and titanium isotopic compositions of presolar SiC grains from the Murchison CM2 chondrite . Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 221, 145-161 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.031 2018

  80. [80]

    Barzyk, M.R

    J. José and M. Hernanz, The origin of presolar nova grains. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 42, 1135- 1143 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb00565.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb00565.x 2007

Showing first 80 references.