Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Galaxy-LRD Strong Lenses: A Missing Population?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.02739 v1 pith:YXPOW42D submitted 2026-08-03 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords lrdspopulationdeflectorsdensitiesdetectabledoublesgalaxygalaxy-scale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The physical nature of Little Red Dots (LRDs) remains uncertain, although these abundant, compact, and red sources may offer important insights into early black-hole growth and galaxy formation. Strong gravitational lensing can magnify LRDs and spatially resolve their internal structure, thereby helping to discriminate among competing physical scenarios. However, no galaxy-scale strongly lensed LRD has yet been securely confirmed. To predict the abundance of such systems in current and future surveys and to guide dedicated searches, we present the first benchmark estimate of the detectable population of galaxy-scale lensed LRDs by combining literature-based LRD source models with a population of foreground early-type galaxy deflectors. Our Monte Carlo simulation spans $50~{\rm deg}^{2}$ and contains 270,713 LRDs and 5,460,841 deflectors. We predict idealized surface densities of $10.70\pm3.76~{\rm deg}^{-2}$ for doubles and $0.64\pm0.69~{\rm deg}^{-2}$ for quads. After accounting for the JWST point-spread function and survey limiting magnitudes, the detectable surface densities decrease to $3.70\pm1.89~{\rm deg}^{-2}$ and $0.52\pm0.58~{\rm deg}^{-2}$, respectively. For the de-duplicated $0.66~{\rm deg}^{2}$ footprint covered by COSMOS-Web, PRIMER-UDS, PRIMER-COSMOS, CEERS, JADES GOODS-S, and JADES GOODS-N, for which the reported limiting depths are combined through area-weighted averaging in flux space, the predicted probabilities of detecting no systems are $8.6\%$ for doubles and $70.8\%$ for quads.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools