Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 97 references

Energy spectra and fluxes of two-dimensional turbulent quantum droplets

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stirred two-dimensional quantum droplets show Kolmogorov and Vinen energy spectra with a direct cascade and a universal vortex-core tail.

desk verdict First numerical study of turbulent energy spectra in 2D quantum droplets; plausible and worth refereeing, but the N=10^4 state may not be self-bound per the paper's own footnote, and the scaling claims lack error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01771 v1 pith:YXROXD5V submitted 2025-01-03 cond-mat.quant-gas

Shawan Kumar Jha , Mahendra K. Verma , S. I. Mistakidis , Pankaj Kumar Mishra This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords quantumdropletstwo-dimensionalturbulenceenergyspectraKolmogorovscalingVinenvortexextendedGross-PitaevskiiequationLee-Huang-Yangcorrections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a two-dimensional quantum droplet, after being stirred for three rotations by a moving repulsive barrier and then released, develops vortex turbulence whose kinetic-energy spectra reproduce classic scaling laws of quantum fluids. The incompressible part follows Kolmogorov $k^{{-5/3}}$ scaling when vortices organize into dipoles or clusters, Vinen-like $k^{{-1}}$ scaling when vortices are randomly distributed, and a $k^{{-3}}$ tail at large wavenumbers coming from the vortex cores. The compressible part shows $k^{{-3/2}}$ infrared scaling, indicating weak wave turbulence, and in one regime a trend toward k at high wavenumbers, suggesting thermalization. Energy fluxes are mostly positive, meaning a direct cascade from large to small length scales. The result matters because it extends quantum-turbulence phenomenology from ordinary Bose-Einstein condensates to droplets stabilized by quantum fluctuations.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on the two-dimensional extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation with a logarithmic nonlinearity that encodes mean-field interactions plus Lee-Huang-Yang quantum fluctuations. Turbulence is diagnosed by decomposing the density-weighted velocity field into incompressible (vortical) and compressible (acoustic) parts, computing angle-averaged kinetic energy spectra and fluxes, and classifying vortex arrangements with the second-order sign correlation function C_2 and the ratio of incompressible to compressible kinetic energy. The spectra are obtained through the angle-averaged Wiener-Khinchin theorem, and the fluxes through a spectral decomposition of the energy transfer across wavenumbers.

What would settle it

Compute the total energy of the N=$10^{4}$ box-trapped ground state used for cases I-III. If it is positive, the state is not a self-bound droplet and the central claim fails; a clean test would repeat the stirring protocol at lower atom numbers in a larger box and check whether $k^{{-5/3}}$, $k^{{-1}}$ and $k^{{-3}}$ scalings and the positive direct flux survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors' central discovery is that a self-bound two-dimensional droplet driven by a rotating Gaussian obstacle enters clearly separated turbulent response regimes determined by the barrier height and speed, as diagnosed by the incompressible and compressible kinetic energy spectra. In the homogeneous droplet environment, vortex dipoles and vortex clusters yield Kolmogorov $k^{{-5/3}}$ infrared scaling, random vortex distributions yield Vinen $k^{{-1}}$ scaling, and all cases show $k^{{-3}}$ ultraviolet scaling from vortex cores. The compressible spectra exhibit $k^{{-3/2}}$ infrared scaling in all cases, with the random-distribution case approaching k in the ultraviolet and indicating thermalization. The flux analysis shows a direct energy cascade that is largest during the second stirring period and suppressed once stirring stops.

Load-bearing premise

The homogeneous-droplet simulations use N=$10^{4}$ atoms, yet the paper's own footnote states the total energy is negative only for atom numbers up to 9700; if the N=$10^{4}$ box-filling state is a gas with positive energy, the claimed droplet-specific turbulence is not demonstrated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, vortex turbulence in droplet environments displays a universal k^{-3} vortex-core scaling at large wavenumbers, matching scalar Bose-Einstein condensates.
  • The infrared scaling of the incompressible kinetic energy depends on vortex organization: k^{-5/3} for dipoles or clusters, and k^{-1} for random vortex distributions.
  • The mostly positive incompressible energy flux indicates a direct cascade from large to small length scales in the homogeneous droplet.
  • The compressible k^{-3/2} infrared scaling implies that weak wave turbulence coexists with vortex turbulence in stirred droplets.
  • In the flat-top droplet, faster stirring converts a vortex-dipole regime into one with many vortex-antivortex pairs, accompanied by observable distortion of the droplet boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The k^{-3} ultraviolet scaling is presented as independent of background, suggesting a universal vortex-core signature that could be tested by phase-imprinting single vortices into droplets versus scalar condensates and comparing spectra at fixed healing length.
  • Because the homogeneous results are obtained in a finite box that nearly holds the droplet, the infrared scalings may inherit finite-size effects; a larger box or a free-space flat-top droplet would clarify whether k^{-5/3} and k^{-1} regimes are intrinsic or box-induced.
  • The observed boundary deformation and vortex escape in the flat-top droplet offer a testable experimental fingerprint: absorption imaging of a stirred potassium-39 droplet mixture should show irregular edges when vortex-antivortex pairs dominate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a numerical study of turbulence in two-dimensional quantum droplets described by the logarithmic eGPE. A rotating Gaussian barrier stirs a box-confined droplet for three periods and is then removed; the post-stirring dynamics are classified by the vortex sign correlation function C2 and the ratio of incompressible to compressible kinetic energy. Three regimes are identified: vortex dipoles (case I), random vortex distributions with enhanced sound waves (case II), and vortex-antivortex clusters (case III). The central claims are that the incompressible energy spectra show Kolmogorov k^{-5/3} scaling (cases I and III), Vinen-like k^{-1} scaling (case II), and a universal k^{-3} ultraviolet scaling from vortex cores, while the compressible spectra show k^{-3/2} infrared scaling and regime-dependent ultraviolet behavior; positive fluxes are interpreted as a direct energy cascade. A harmonically trapped flat-top droplet is also studied. Appendix A imprints a single vortex and confirms k^{-3} ultraviolet scaling in both scalar BEC and droplet backgrounds.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a useful extension of quantum-turbulence phenomenology to the self-bound droplet phase, where the LHY logarithmic nonlinearity changes the background and the equation of motion relative to conventional BECs. The paper has visible strengths: the k^{-3} ultraviolet scaling is explicitly checked in Appendix A by imprinting a single vortex, so that scaling is an output rather than an input; the phase diagrams in Figs. 3 and 4 cover a broad parameter range and give a qualitative map of vortex-dipole, random, and cluster regimes; and the distinction between incompressible and compressible channels is handled with the standard Helmholtz decomposition. The main reservations are whether the N=10^4 homogeneous state used for the central turbulence analysis is actually a self-bound droplet according to the paper's own energy criterion, and whether the quoted scaling exponents are sufficiently quantified, since they are identified from individual simulation trajectories without a stated fitting procedure or uncertainty estimates.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV, footnote 1, and Sec. V] The paper's own footnote in Sec. IV states that the total energy of the droplet remains negative only for N <= 9700, yet the homogeneous-droplet turbulence analysis in Sec. V (Figs. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7(a), and cases I-III) uses N = 10^4. For a self-bound quantum droplet the total energy should be negative; a positive-energy state in a periodic box is a box-confined gas rather than a droplet. If the N=10^4 state is not a droplet, then the central claim that the observed Kolmogorov, Vinen, and vortex-core scalings are properties of turbulent quantum droplets is not established. The authors should either repeat the analysis for N <= 9700 and verify that the spectra and fluxes are unchanged, or provide a quantitative demonstration (e.g., the binding energy, chemical potential, and density profile) that the N=10^4 state remains droplet-like for the purposes of the turbulent dynamics. Appendix A, which uses N=900, does not by itself validate the droplet identity of the N=10^4 turbulent state.
  2. [Secs. V.B-V.D and Figs. 5-7] The scaling exponents k^{-5/3}, k^{-1}, k^{-3}, k^{-3/2}, k^{-7/2}, and k^{-7} are identified from single simulation runs, without a stated fitting procedure, fitting ranges, or uncertainty quantification. The phase diagram in Fig. 7 classifies regimes as k^{-1}, k^{-5/3}, 'no clean power law', or 'no vortex generation', but no error bars or statistical measures are given. Because the central claim of the paper is precisely that these power laws appear, the analysis should specify the exact wavenumber intervals used for each fit, the fitting method, and an estimate of the uncertainty (for example, from multiple realizations, time-window averages, or bootstrap resampling of the spectra). Without this, the distinction between genuine power-law regimes and transient or crossover behavior remains insufficiently supported.
  3. [Abstract, Sec. V.C, Fig. 6(c), and Conclusions] There is an internal inconsistency in the reported compressible ultraviolet scaling. Section V.C and Fig. 6(c) report a k^{-7} decay for case III, while the abstract and the Conclusions state that both cases II and III have a trend toward k scaling signaling thermalization. The text in Sec. V.C explicitly says that the k^{-7} scaling 'is modified as time evolves but again never becomes linear', which contradicts the summary statements. The authors should either correct the summary claims or clearly distinguish between different time windows and wavenumber ranges. The introductory summary in Sec. I, which mentions only k^{-7/2} for dipole-dominated cases and k scaling otherwise, is also not compatible with the k^{-7} case III result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. V.B, footnote 4] The intervortex distance l0 = 1/sqrt(Nv) is taken from repulsive Bose gases, and the footnote admits that its validity for droplets is an open issue; since k_l0 is used to identify the Kolmogorov scaling range, a sensitivity analysis with respect to this definition would strengthen the quantitative conclusions.
  2. [Fig. 3 and Fig. 4] The phase diagrams show C2 and zeta as smooth color maps, but each parameter point appears to come from a single simulation; adding a brief statement about run-to-run variability or averaging protocols would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Sec. V.D, Fig. 7] The red markers in Fig. 7 are labeled with a theta symbol in the legend, but the caption does not define what value of theta corresponds to the 'not a clean power law' classification.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'striring' (Sec. V.A), 'interacomponent' (Sec. II), and inconsistent notation for the k^1 scaling, which is written both as 'k' and as 'k^1' in different places; a careful proofread is recommended.
  5. [Sec. VI] The flat-top droplet section uses a harmonic trap and N=2e4, but the criterion from footnote 1 is not discussed for this trapped geometry; a sentence clarifying the droplet binding condition in the presence of the trap would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor same-group citations but no load-bearing circularity; central spectral scalings are simulation outputs.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained: the reported spectral scalings (k^{-5/3}, k^{-1}, k^{-3}, and the compressible laws) are outputs of direct eGPE simulations, not inputs, and no parameter is fitted to the target spectra and then renamed a prediction. The k^{-3} ultraviolet law is independently validated in Appendix A by imprinting a single vortex in both a scalar BEC and a droplet background, so it is not assumed from the turbulent runs. The only same-group citations are to [25] for the flux decomposition and the intervortex-distance scale l0 = 1/sqrt(Nv), and to [42,79] for methodological context; these are not load-bearing because Eq. (7) is the standard spectral-flux definition, and l0 is a geometric scale obtained from the measured vortex count with the authors explicitly noting that its applicability to droplets is an open issue. The internal inconsistency flagged in Section IV footnote 1 (total energy negative only for N <= 9700 while the homogeneous turbulence runs use N = 10^4) is a physical-regime or correctness concern about whether the simulated state is truly a self-bound droplet, not a circularity: even if the droplet interpretation is weakened, the scaling laws remain simulation outputs. Likewise, the abstract/conclusion discrepancy between k^{-7} and k in the compressible ultraviolet is a reporting inconsistency, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends mainly on the eGPE model and on spectral diagnostics borrowed from quantum turbulence; no free parameters are fit to the target power laws, but several domain assumptions are made, notably that N=10^4 in a 60x60 box is still a droplet.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The single-component 2D eGPE with logarithmic nonlinearity, i∂ψ/∂t = -1/2 ∇²ψ + V_S ψ + |ψ|²ψ ln(|ψ|²), correctly describes the droplet mixture in the low-energy regime.
    Invoked in Section II, citing Refs. [53,54]. If this effective equation fails for 2D droplets, all spectra are artifacts of the wrong model.
  • domain assumption The two-component bosonic mixture reduces to a single-component droplet equation.
    Section II states the reduction and cites Refs. [45,72-75]; the paper does not simulate the full two-component system.
  • standard math The angle-averaged Wiener-Khinchin theorem and Helmholtz decomposition into incompressible and compressible velocity fields yield unbiased energy spectra.
    Section III, Eq. (6), following Ref. [67]. These are standard tools; no new derivation is offered.
  • ad hoc to paper The mean intervortex distance is l0 = 1/sqrt(Nv), as used in repulsive Bose gases.
    Section V.B and footnote 4: the authors note the validity of this formula for droplets is an open issue, yet it sets the k_l0 scale used to interpret the inertial range.
  • ad hoc to paper The N=10^4 state in a 60x60 periodic box is a homogeneous droplet despite the total energy being positive for N>9700.
    Footnote 1 reports energy negativity only up to N=9700; the main runs use N=10^4, so the droplet label rests on an unverified assumption.
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary conditions and finite box size do not qualitatively alter the scaling laws.
    The authors acknowledge finite-size effects and reflected sound waves in footnote 2; they do not provide a resolution study.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Energy spectra and fluxes of two-dimensional turbulent quantum droplets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YXROXD5V

@misc{pith2026250101771,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Energy spectra and fluxes of two-dimensional turbulent quantum droplets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YXROXD5V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01771}
}
abstract

We explore the energy spectra and associated fluxes of turbulent two-dimensional quantum droplets subjected to a rotating paddling potential which is removed after a few oscillation periods. A systematic analysis on the impact of the characteristics (height and velocity) of the rotating potential and the droplet atom number reveals the emergence of different dynamical response regimes. These are classified by utilizing the second-order sign correlation function and the ratio of incompressible versus compressible kinetic energies. They involve, vortex configurations ranging from vortex dipoles to vortex clusters and randomly distributed vortex-antivortex pairs. The incompressible kinetic energy spectrum features Kolmogorov ($k^{-5/3}$) and Vinen like ($k^{-1}$) scaling in the infrared regime, while a $k^{-3}$ decay in the ultraviolet captures the presence of vortices. The compressible spectrum shows $k^{-3/2}$ scaling within the infrared and $k$ power law in the case of enhanced sound-wave emission suggesting thermalization. Significant distortions are observed in the droplet periphery in the presence of a harmonic trap. A direct energy cascade (from large to small length scales) is mainly identified through the flux. Our findings offer insights into the turbulent response of exotic phases-of-matter, featuring quantum fluctuations, and may inspire investigations aiming to unravel self-similar nonequilibrium dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01771 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Ground state droplet densities along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Density snapshots (see legends) across the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Phase diagram of the vortex sign correlation function ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phase diagram of the ratio, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a)-(c) Incompressible kinetic energy spectra and (d)-(f) corresponding energy fluxes of the 2D stirred homogeneous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a)-(c) Compressible kinetic energy spectra and (d)-(f) associated fluxes of the driven 2D homogeneous droplet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Phase diagram demonstrating the scaling exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Density profiles at different stirring periods (see legends) of a 2D flat-top quantum droplet. The rotating potential of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a), (b) Incompressible kinetic energy spectra, (c), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Amplitude of the 2D wave function for the entire [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Beresnyak and A

    A. Beresnyak and A. Lazarian,Turbulence in magneto- hydrodynamics, Vol. 12 (Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Kosowsky, A

    A. Kosowsky, A. Mack, and T. Kahniashvili, Gravita- 16 tionalradiationfromcosmologicalturbulence,Phys.Rev. D 66, 024030 (2002)

    2002

  3. [3]

    J. C. Wyngaard,Turbulence in the Atmosphere(Cam- bridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Picozzi, J

    A. Picozzi, J. Garnier, T. Hansson, P. Suret, S. Ran- doux, G. Millot, and D. N. Christodoulides, Optical wave turbulence: Towards a unified nonequilibrium thermody- namic formulation of statistical nonlinear optics, Phys. Rep. 542, 1 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    M. C. Tsatsos, P. E. Tavares, A. Cidrim, A. R. Fritsch, M. A. Caracanhas, F. E. A. dos Santos, C. F. Barenghi, and V. S. Bagnato, Quantum turbulence in trapped atomic bose–einstein condensates, Phys. Rep. 622, 1 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    W. F. Vinen and R. J. Donnelly, Quantum turbulence, Physics Today60, 43 (2007)

    2007

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    Tsubota, Quantum turbulence, JPSJ 77, 111006 (2008)

    M. Tsubota, Quantum turbulence, JPSJ 77, 111006 (2008)

    2008

  2. [11]

    Frisch, Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge university press, 1995)

    U. Frisch, Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge university press, 1995)

    1995

  3. [12]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Inertial ranges in two-dimensional tur- bulence, Physics of fluids10, 1417 (1967)

    1967

  4. [13]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, The local structure of turbulence in incompressibleviscousfluidforverylargereynolds,Num- bers. In Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR30, 301 (1941)

    1941

  5. [14]

    Kellay and W

    H. Kellay and W. I. Goldburg, Two-dimensional turbu- lence: a review of some recent experiments, Rep. Progr. Phys. 65, 845 (2002)

    2002

  6. [15]

    S. Chen, R. E. Ecke, G. L. Eyink, M. Rivera, M. Wan, and Z. Xiao, Physical mechanism of the two-dimensional inverse energy cascade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 084502 (2006)

    2006

  7. [16]

    Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics, Il Nuovo Cimento (1943-1954) 6, 279 (1949)

    L. Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics, Il Nuovo Cimento (1943-1954) 6, 279 (1949)

    1949

  8. [17]

    E. A. L. Henn, J. A. Seman, G. Roati, K. M. F. Mag- alhaes, and V. S. Bagnato, Emergence of turbulence in an oscillating bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 045301 (2009)

    2009

  9. [18]

    Seman, E

    J. Seman, E. Henn, R. Shiozaki, G. Roati, F. Poveda- Cuevas, K. M. F. Magalhães, V. Yukalov, M. Tsubota, M. Kobayashi, K. Kasamatsu,et al., Route to turbulence in a trapped bose-einstein condensate, Laser Physics Let- ters 8, 691 (2011)

    2011

  10. [19]

    Thompson, G

    K. Thompson, G. Bagnato, G. D. Telles, M. A. Caracan- has, F. Dos Santos, and V. S. Bagnato, Evidence of power law behavior in the momentum distribution of a turbu- lenttrappedbose–einsteincondensate,LaserPhysicsLet- ters 11, 015501 (2013)

    2013

  11. [20]

    Madeira, A

    L. Madeira, A. Cidrim, M. Hemmerling, M. A. Caracan- has, F. E. A. dos Santos, and V. S. Bagnato, Quantum turbulence in Bose–Einstein condensates: Present status and new challenges ahead, AVS Quantum Sci.2, 035901 (2020)

    2020

  12. [21]

    Kobayashi and M

    M. Kobayashi and M. Tsubota, Kolmogorov spectrum of superfluid turbulence: Numerical analysis of the gross- pitaevskii equation with a small-scale dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 065302 (2005)

    2005

  13. [22]

    Kobayashi and M

    M. Kobayashi and M. Tsubota, Quantum turbulence in a trapped bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 76, 045603 (2007)

    2007

  14. [23]

    Kobayashi and M

    M. Kobayashi and M. Tsubota, Quantum turbulence in a trapped Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A76, 045603 (2007)

    2007

  15. [24]

    C. F. Barenghi, H. Middleton-Spencer, L. Galantucci, and N. Parker, Types of quantum turbulence, AVS Quan- tum Science5 (2023)

    2023

  16. [25]

    Sivakumar, P

    A. Sivakumar, P. K. Mishra, A. A. Hujeirat, and P. Mu- ruganandam, Energy spectra and fluxes of turbulent rotating bose–einstein condensates in two dimensions, Physics of Fluids36 (2024)

    2024

  17. [26]

    Numasato, M

    R. Numasato, M. Tsubota, and V. S. L’vov, Direct en- ergy cascade in two-dimensional compressible quantum turbulence, Phys. Rev. A81, 063630 (2010)

    2010

  18. [27]

    A. C. White, C. F. Barenghi, and N. P. Proukakis, Cre- ation and characterization of vortex clusters in atomic bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013635 (2012)

    2012

  19. [28]

    M. T. Reeves, T. P. Billam, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Signatures of coherent vortex structures in a dis- orderedtwo-dimensionalquantumfluid,Phys.Rev.A 89, 053631 (2014)

    2014

  20. [29]

    G. W. Stagg, A. J. Allen, N. G. Parker, and C. F. Barenghi, Generation and decay of two-dimensional quantum turbulence in a trapped bose-einstein conden- sate, Phys. Rev. A91, 013612 (2015)

    2015

  21. [30]

    A. J. Groszek, T. P. Simula, D. M. Paganin, and K. Helmerson, Onsager vortex formation in bose-einstein condensates in two-dimensional power-law traps, Phys. Rev. A93, 043614 (2016)

    2016

  22. [31]

    X. Yu, T. P. Billam, J. Nian, M. T. Reeves, and A. S. Bradley, Theory of the vortex-clustering transition in a confined two-dimensional quantum fluid, Phys. Rev. A 94, 023602 (2016)

    2016

  23. [33]

    J. A. Estrada, M. E. Brachet, and P. D. Mininni, Turbu- lence in rotating Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 105, 063321 (2022)

    2022

  24. [34]

    J. A. Estrada, M. E. Brachet, and P. D. Mininni, Ther- malized Abrikosov lattices from decaying turbulence in rotating BECs, AVS Quantum Sci.4, 046201 (2022)

    2022

  25. [35]

    Cidrim, A

    A. Cidrim, A. C. White, A. J. Allen, V. S. Bagnato, and C. F. Barenghi, Vinen turbulence via the decay of multicharged vortices in trapped atomic Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A96, 023617 (2017)

    2017

  26. [36]

    Á. V. M. Marino, L. Madeira, A. Cidrim, F. E. A. dos Santos, and V. S. Bagnato, Momentum distribution of vinen turbulence in trapped atomic Bose-Einstein con- densates, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top.230, 809 (2021)

    2021

  27. [37]

    A. S. Bradley and B. P. Anderson, Energy spectra of vortex distributions in two-dimensional quantum turbu- lence, Phys. Rev. X2, 041001 (2012)

    2012

  28. [38]

    Mithun, K

    T. Mithun, K. Kasamatsu, B. Dey, and P. G. Kevrekidis, Decay of two-dimensional quantum turbulence in binary bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 103, 023301 (2021)

    2021

  29. [39]

    S. Kang, S. W. Seo, J. H. Kim, and Y.-i. Shin, Emergence and scaling of spin turbulence in quenched antiferromag- 17 netic spinor bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A95, 053638 (2017)

    2017

  30. [40]

    Sabari, R

    S. Sabari, R. Kishor Kumar, and L. Tomio, Vortex dy- namics and turbulence in dipolar bose-einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. A109, 023313 (2024)

    2024

  31. [41]

    Bland, G

    T. Bland, G. Stagg, L. Galantucci, A. Baggaley, and N. Parker, Quantum ferrofluid turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 174501 (2018)

    2018

  32. [42]

    Bougas, K

    G. Bougas, K. Mukherjee, and S. I. Mistakidis, Wave tur- bulenceindrivendipolargases,arXiv:2410.14123 (2024)

    2024

  33. [43]

    Cheiney, C

    P. Cheiney, C. R. Cabrera, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, L. Tanzi, and L. Tarruell, Bright soliton to quantum droplet tran- sition in a mixture of bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 135301 (2018)

    2018

  34. [44]

    Semeghini, G

    G. Semeghini, G. Ferioli, L. Masi, C. Mazzinghi, L. Wol- swijk, F. Minardi, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, M. In- guscio, and M. Fattori, Self-bound quantum droplets of atomic mixtures in free space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 235301 (2018)

    2018

  35. [45]

    C. R. Cabrera, L. Tanzi, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, P. Thomas, P. Cheiney, and L. Tarruell, Quantum liquid droplets in a mixture of bose-einstein condensates, Science359, 301 (2018)

    2018

  36. [46]

    D’Errico, A

    C. D’Errico, A. Burchianti, M. Prevedelli, L. Salasnich, F. Ancilotto, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, and C. Fort, Ob- servation of quantum droplets in a heteronuclear bosonic mixture, Phys. Rev. Research1, 033155 (2019)

    2019

  37. [47]

    Cavicchioli, C

    L. Cavicchioli, C. Fort, F. Ancilotto, M. Modugno, F. Minardi, and A. Burchianti, Dynamical formation of multiple quantum droplets in a bose-bose mixture, arXiv:2409.16017 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  38. [48]

    Böttcher, J.-N

    F. Böttcher, J.-N. Schmidt, J. Hertkorn, K. S. Ng, S. D. Graham, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, New states of matter with fine-tuned interactions: quantum droplets and dipolar supersolids, Rep. Progr. Phys. 84, 012403 (2020)

    2020

  39. [49]

    Chomaz, I

    L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe- Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau, Dipolar physics: a re- view of experiments with magnetic quantum gases, Rep. Progr. Phys.86, 026401 (2022)

    2022

  40. [50]

    T. Ilg, J. Kumlin, L. Santos, D. S. Petrov, and H. P. Büchler,Dimensionalcrossoverforthebeyond-mean-field correction in bose gases, Phys. Rev. A98, 051604 (2018)

    2018

  41. [51]

    J. C. Pelayo, G. Bougas, T. Fogarty, T. Busch, and S. I. Mistakidis, Phases and dynamics of quantum droplets in the crossover to two-dimensions, arXiv:2407.16383 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  42. [52]

    T. D. Lee, K. Huang, and C. N. Yang, Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a bose system of hard spheres and its low-temperatureproperties,Phys.Rev. 106,1135(1957)

    1957

  43. [53]

    D. S. Petrov, Quantum mechanical stabilization of a col- lapsing bose-bose mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 155302 (2015)

    2015

  44. [54]

    D. S. Petrov and G. E. Astrakharchik, Ultradilute low- dimensional liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 100401 (2016)

    2016

  45. [55]

    Z.-H. Luo, W. Pang, B. Liu, Y.-Y. Li, and B. A. Mal- omed, A new form of liquid matter: Quantum droplets, Frontiers of Physics16, 1 (2021)

    2021

  46. [56]

    S. I. Mistakidis, A. G. Volosniev, R. E. Barfknecht, T. Fogarty, T. Busch, A. Foerster, P. Schmelcher, and N. T. Zinner, Few-body bose gases in low dimensions—a laboratory for quantum dynamics, Phys. Rep.1042, 1 (2023)

    2023

  47. [57]

    G. C. Katsimiga, S. I. Mistakidis, G. N. Koutsokostas, D. J. Frantzeskakis, R. Carretero-González, and P. G. Kevrekidis, Solitary waves in a quantum droplet-bearing system, Phys. Rev. A107, 063308 (2023)

    2023

  48. [58]

    Kopyciński, B

    J. Kopyciński, B. Tüzemen, W. Górecki, K. Pawłowski, and M. Łebek, Propagation properties and stability of dark solitons in weakly interacting bose–bose droplets, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. and Opt. Phys.57, 035302 (2024)

    2024

  49. [59]

    Edmonds, Dark quantum droplets and solitary waves in beyond-mean-field bose-einstein condensate mixtures, Phys

    M. Edmonds, Dark quantum droplets and solitary waves in beyond-mean-field bose-einstein condensate mixtures, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023175 (2023)

    2023

  50. [60]

    M. N. Tengstrand, P. Stürmer, E. Karabulut, and S. M. Reimann, Rotating binary bose-einstein condensates and vortex clusters in quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 160405 (2019)

    2019

  51. [61]

    Y. Li, Z. Chen, Z. Luo, C. Huang, H. Tan, W. Pang, and B. A. Malomed, Two-dimensional vortex quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. A98, 063602 (2018)

    2018

  52. [62]

    A. Yang, J. Zhou, X. Liang, G. Li, B. Liu, H.-B. Luo, B. A. Malomed, and Y. Li, Two-dimensional quantum droplets in binary quadrupolar condensates, New Journal of Physics26, 053037 (2024)

    2024

  53. [63]

    Bougas, G

    G. Bougas, G. C. Katsimiga, P. G. Kevrekidis, and S. I. Mistakidis, Stability and dynamics of nonlinear excita- tions in a two-dimensional droplet-bearing environment, Phys. Rev. A110, 033317 (2024)

    2024

  54. [64]

    Cheng, Y.-W

    S.-C. Cheng, Y.-W. Wang, and W.-H. Kuan, Dynamics ofrapidlyrotatingbose–einsteinquantumdroplets,Phys. Scr. 99, 065410 (2024)

    2024

  55. [65]

    G. Li, Z. Zhao, B. Liu, Y. Li, Y. V. Kartashov, and B. A. Malomed, Can vortex quantum droplets be realized experimentally?, Frontiers of Physics20, 13401 (2025)

    2025

  56. [66]

    S. I. Mistakidis, G. Bougas, G. C. Katsimiga, and P. G. Kevrekidis,Generictransversestabilityofkinkstructures in atomic and optical nonlinear media with competing attractive and repulsive interactions, arXiv:2405.19607 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  57. [67]

    A. S. Bradley, R. K. Kumar, S. Pal, and X. Yu, Spectral analysis for compressible quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043322 (2022)

    2022

  58. [68]

    A. W. Baggaley, L. K. Sherwin, C. F. Barenghi, and Y. A. Sergeev, Thermally and mechanically driven quan- tum turbulence in helium ii, Phys. Rev. B86, 104501 (2012)

    2012

  59. [69]

    Z.HadzibabicandJ.Dalibard,Two-dimensionalboseflu- ids: An atomic physics perspective, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 34, 389 (2011)

    2011

  60. [70]

    S. Huh, K. Mukherjee, K. Kwon, J. Seo, J. Hur, S. I. Mistakidis, H. R. Sadeghpour, and J.-y. Choi, Universal- ity class of a spinor bose–einstein condensate far from equilibrium, Nature Phys.20, 402 (2024)

    2024

  61. [71]

    Ferioli, G

    G. Ferioli, G. Semeghini, L. Masi, G. Giusti, G. Mod- ugno, M. Inguscio, A. Gallemí, A. Recati, and M. Fattori, Collisions of self-bound quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090401 (2019)

    2019

  62. [72]

    T. A. Flynn, L. Parisi, T. P. Billam, and N. G. Parker, Quantum droplets in imbalanced atomic mixtures, Phys. Rev. Research5, 033167 (2023)

    2023

  63. [73]

    I. A. Englezos, P. Schmelcher, and S. I. Mistakidis, Particle-imbalancedweaklyinteractingquantumdroplets in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A110, 023324 (2024)

    2024

  64. [74]

    S. I. Mistakidis, T. Mithun, P. G. Kevrekidis, H. R. Sadeghpour, and P. Schmelcher, Formation and quench of homonuclear and heteronuclear quantum droplets in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Research3, 043128 (2021). 18

    2021

  65. [75]

    Y. V. Kartashov and D. A. Zezyulin, Double-flattop quantum droplets in low-dimensional bose–bose mix- tures, Chaos, Solitons Fractals190, 115761 (2025)

    2025

  66. [76]

    W. J. Kwon, G. Moon, S. W. Seo, and Y. Shin, Critical velocity for vortex shedding in a bose-einstein conden- sate, Phys. Rev. A91, 053615 (2015)

    2015

  67. [77]

    W. J. Kwon, J. H. Kim, S. W. Seo, and Y. Shin, Observa- tion of von kármán vortex street in an atomic superfluid gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 245301 (2016)

    2016

  68. [78]

    S. W. Seo, B. Ko, J. H. Kim, and Y. Shin, Observation of vortex-antivortex pairing in decaying 2d turbulence of a superfluid gas, Sci. Rep.7, 4587 (2017)

    2017

  69. [79]

    S. K. Jha, S. S. Rawat, M. K. Verma, and P. K. Mishra, qutarang: A python gpe solver to study turbulence in quantum systems, arXiv:2301.08275 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  70. [80]

    M. T. Reeves, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Classi- cal and quantum regimes of two-dimensional turbulence in trapped Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A86, 053621 (2012), publisher: American Physical Society

    2012

  71. [81]

    Madeira, M

    L. Madeira, M. A. Caracanhas, F. dos Santos, and V. S. Bagnato, Quantum turbulence in quantum gases, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 37 (2020)

    2020

  72. [82]

    Madelung, Quantum theory in hydrodynamical form, z

    E. Madelung, Quantum theory in hydrodynamical form, z. Phys40, 322 (1927)

    1927

  73. [83]

    C. Nore, M. Abid, and M. E. Brachet, Kolmogorov tur- bulence in low-temperature superflows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3896 (1997)

    1997

  74. [84]

    H. Kwak, J. H. Jung, and Y.-i. Shin, Minimum critical velocity of a gaussian obstacle in a bose-einstein conden- sate, Phys. Rev. A107, 023310 (2023)

    2023

  75. [85]

    Kokubo and K

    H. Kokubo and K. Kasamatsu, Impact of density inho- mogeneity on the critical velocity for vortex shedding in a harmonically trapped bose–einstein condensate, Journal of Low Temperature Physics214, 427 (2024)

    2024

  76. [86]

    Gauthier, M

    G. Gauthier, M. T. Reeves, X. Yu, A. S. Bradley, M. A. Baker, T. A. Bell, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, M. J. Davis, and T. W. Neely, Giant vortex clusters in a two- dimensional quantum fluid, Science364, 1264 (2019)

    2019

  77. [87]

    M. R. Andrews, D. M. Kurn, H.-J. Miesner, D. S. Durfee, C.G.Townsend, S.Inouye,andW.Ketterle,Propagation of sound in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 553 (1997)

    1997

  78. [88]

    Dalfovo, S

    F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of bose-einstein condensation in trapped gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, 463 (1999)

    1999

  79. [89]

    Kanai and W

    T. Kanai and W. Guo, True Mechanism of Spontaneous Order from Turbulence in Two-Dimensional Superfluid Manifolds, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 095301 (2021)

    2021

  80. [90]

    Boffetta and R

    G. Boffetta and R. E. Ecke, Two-dimensional turbulence, Annual review of fluid mechanics44, 427 (2012)

    2012

  81. [91]

    Nazarenko and M

    S. Nazarenko and M. Onorato, Wave turbulence and vor- tices in bose–einstein condensation, Physica D 219, 1 (2006)

    2006

  82. [92]

    Shukla, M

    V. Shukla, M. Brachet, and R. Pandit, Turbulence in the two-dimensional fourier-truncated gross–pitaevskii equa- tion, New Journal of Physics15, 113025 (2013)

    2013

  83. [93]

    J. H. V. Nguyen, M. C. Tsatsos, D. Luo, A. U. J. Lode, G. D. Telles, V. S. Bagnato, and R. G. Hulet, Parametric excitation of a bose-einstein condensate: From faraday waves to granulation, Phys. Rev. X9, 011052 (2019)

    2019

  84. [94]

    Yukalov, A

    V. Yukalov, A. Novikov, and V. S. Bagnato, Strongly nonequilibrium bose-condensed atomic systems, Journal of Low Temperature Physics180, 53 (2015)

    2015

  85. [95]

    M. T. Reeves, T. P. Billam, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Inverse energy cascade in forced two- dimensional quantum turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 104501 (2013)

    2013

  86. [96]

    Karailiev, M

    A. Karailiev, M. Gazo, M. Gałka, C. Eigen, T. Satoor, and Z. Hadzibabic, Observation of an inverse turbulent- wave cascade in a driven quantum gas, arXiv:2405.01537 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  87. [97]

    Y. Zhu, G. Krstulovic, and S. Nazarenko, Transition to strong wave turbulence in bose-einstein condensates, arXiv:2411.19812 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  88. [98]

    L. Cao, V. Bolsinger, S. I. Mistakidis, G. Koutentakis, S. Krönke, J. Schurer, and P. Schmelcher, A unified ab initio approach to the correlated quantum dynamics of ultracold fermionic and bosonic mixtures, J. Chem. Phys. 147 (2017)

    2017

  89. [99]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein condensa- tion and superfluidity, Vol. 164 (Oxford University Press, 2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.