REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 145 references
Spectroscopic and Photometric Investigation of Some Potentially Chemically Peculiar $\delta$ Scuti Stars
T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read This paper reports that only three of ten previously flagged chemically peculiar Delta Scuti stars are actually peculiar after detailed abundance analysis.
desk verdict Ten delta Scuti stars get a careful reclassification, and the paper is honest that only three are genuinely peculiar; check the full text's error budget before trusting the seven 'normal' verdicts. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The carrying method is model-atmosphere abundance analysis: high-resolution spectra are fit to synthetic spectra computed from 1D LTE model atmospheres to obtain effective temperature, surface gravity, microturbulence, and elemental abundances for each star. Pulsation frequencies and mode identifications come from TESS light curves, and masses and ages come from matching evolutionary tracks and isochrones. The abundance pattern is the load-bearing output because peculiarity is defined by that pattern.
What would settle it
Re-analyzing the same ten stars with independent abundance methods (for example, non-LTE or 3D model atmospheres, or different line lists) and finding that one of the seven 'normal' stars shows a significant abundance anomaly, or that a confirmed Am or $\lambda$ Boötis pattern disappears, would overturn the conclusion. A quick check is whether any of the seven normal stars has a projected rotational velocity high enough to smear lines and hide the Am overabundances.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that a homogeneous abundance analysis shrinks the list of chemically peculiar stars in the sample from ten candidates to three confirmed cases: AU Scl and FG Eri show the metallic-line Am pattern (overabundant iron-peak and rare-earth elements), while HZ Vel shows the surface-depleted pattern of a $\lambda$ Boötis star (underabundant iron-peak elements with normal C, N, O, S). The other seven stars, despite having been previously flagged, show normal abundance distributions. The authors take this as evidence that detailed spectral abundance work, not just classification or photometric indices, is required to establish chemical peculiarity am
Load-bearing premise
The classification of each star as peculiar or normal rests on the assumption that the 1D LTE model-atmosphere abundance analysis, with its adopted line lists, microturbulence, and surface gravity, is free of systematic errors large enough to create or erase an abundance anomaly.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Seven stars previously listed as chemically peculiar Delta Scuti stars are reclassified as chemically normal, so existing catalogues of peculiar pulsators may need revision.
- AU Scl and FG Eri join the small set of confirmed Am stars among Delta Scuti pulsators, making them useful for studying how metal stratification interacts with pulsation.
- HZ Vel is a confirmed $\lambda$ Boötis Delta Scuti star, a rare combination that can test pulsation-driving models in stars with depleted surface iron.
- The derived masses and ages tie the peculiar/normal classification to evolutionary state, allowing searches for an evolutionary dependence of chemical peculiarity.
- The derived pulsation modes give the properties needed to compare pulsation amplitudes and frequencies between the peculiar and normal stars in the sample.
Reading between the lines
- Beyond the paper: if these results hold, the true incidence of chemical peculiarity among Delta Scuti stars could be much lower than older flag-based catalogues suggest, so statistical studies that rely on those catalogues should be re-run after abundance analyses.
- Beyond the paper: applying the same homogeneous pipeline to a larger, unbiased sample of Delta Scuti stars would settle whether the 3-in-10 ratio is representative, while deliberately including stars with no prior peculiarity flag would control for selection bias.
- Beyond the paper: a testable extension is to compare the TESS pulsation-mode properties of the three peculiar stars against matched normal stars; models that predict pulsation damping from chemical stratification would predict systematically different amplitudes or frequencies.
- Beyond the paper: independent abundance determinations using 3D or non-LTE treatments on the same spectra could confirm the peculiar/normal boundaries, since the classification hinges on the abundance analysis.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports a spectroscopic and photometric analysis of ten δ Scuti stars previously flagged as chemically peculiar. Using high-resolution public spectra and TESS photometry, the authors determine spectral classifications, atmospheric parameters, detailed chemical abundances, pulsation properties, and evolutionary masses/ages. The central claim is that only three stars are genuinely chemically peculiar (AU Scl and FG Eri as Am stars, HZ Vel as a λ Bootis star), while the remaining seven are chemically normal. The authors argue that this demonstrates the necessity of detailed abundance analysis before classifying a star as chemically peculiar.
Significance. If the abundance analysis is reliable, the result would challenge the reliability of previous chemically-peculiar classifications in a sample of δ Scuti stars, with direct implications for studies of pulsation–peculiarity connections. The combination of high-resolution spectroscopy with TESS photometry is an appropriate and potentially powerful approach, and the claimed outcome is falsifiable. However, the scientific value hinges entirely on the accuracy and statistical robustness of the derived abundances and on transparent, quantitative criteria for 'peculiarity'. As presented in the abstract, these load-bearing elements are not documented, so the significance cannot yet be assessed.
major comments (3)
- [Abstract] The central claim—that seven of the ten targets are chemically normal—requires an explicit abundance-error budget and a quantitative peculiarity criterion. The abstract reports neither. Without per-element uncertainties, line counts, and the threshold used (e.g., 2σ offset from solar, or an explicit Am/λ Boo definition), the classification of the 'normal' stars is not verifiable. In A-type stars, known systematic biases from 1D LTE modeling and microturbulence choice can shift abundances by several tenths of a dex, which is enough to flip a borderline classification. Please state the adopted uncertainties and how the peculiar/normal boundary was set.
- [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'detailed chemical abundance distributions' but gives no information about the spectroscopic methodology: model atmospheres (ATLAS9, MARCS, etc.), LTE vs. NLTE, line list, oscillator strengths, spectral synthesis vs. equivalent-width analysis, and how log g, effective temperature, and microturbulence were determined. For δ Scuti stars (A–F type), these choices directly affect the derived abundances. In particular, the ionization balance of Fe and the treatment of the Balmer-line region should be described to rule out systematic offsets that could mimic or hide anomalies. The authors should demonstrate that the conclusions are robust to these choices.
- [Abstract] The ten targets were selected from previous 'chemically peculiar' lists, but the selection criteria and sample completeness are not stated. If the sample was drawn from only those stars with public high-resolution data, it may be biased toward ambiguous or previously under-studied cases, limiting the generalizability of the claim that most prior identifications are wrong. Please provide the original identification source for each star and explain any selection filters (e.g., brightness, spectral coverage, data availability) that could influence the fraction of reclassified stars.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] The phrase 'This study show us' contains a subject–verb agreement error ('study' requires 'shows'). Minor language revision is needed.
- [Abstract] The classification of AU Scl and FG Eri as 'metallic A (Am) stars' uses an abbreviation ('Am') that is defined nowhere in the abstract. The criteria for Am status (e.g., underabundance of Ca/Sc and overabundance of iron-peak elements) should be stated explicitly, even in summary form.
Circularity Check
No circularity: the classification is an empirical abundance analysis, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs.
full rationale
The paper's central claim is an observational classification: ten δ Scuti stars previously flagged as chemically peculiar are re-analyzed using public high-resolution spectra and TESS photometry, and the authors conclude that only three show chemical peculiarity (AU Scl and FG Eri as Am stars, HZ Vel as λ Bootis) while the others are chemically normal. This is not a derivation in which the conclusion is built into the model or the fitting procedure. The classification is obtained by measuring atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances from spectra and comparing them to standard abundance patterns; no equation is defined in terms of the target classification, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The use of previously identified peculiar stars as a sample selection criterion does not make the new classification circular, because the prior labels are the candidates to be tested, not the evidence used to confirm them. The main vulnerability identified by the reader — that 1D LTE model assumptions, microturbulence, and small line lists could bias the abundances and therefore the peculiar/normal verdict — is a real scientific robustness concern, but it is a concern about accuracy and model uncertainty, not about circular reasoning. The paper may be correct or incorrect depending on the quality of the abundance analysis, but nothing in the provided abstract or full text exhibits a step where the conclusion is presupposed by construction. Accordingly, the appropriate circularity score is 0.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (2)
- domain assumption Stellar atmosphere models, likely 1D LTE, are used to derive atmospheric parameters and abundances.
- domain assumption Evolutionary tracks and isochrones are accurate enough for mass and age estimation.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Spectroscopic and Photometric Investigation of Some Potentially Chemically Peculiar $\delta$ Scuti Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z2D5D2TO
@misc{pith2026250804761,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Spectroscopic and Photometric Investigation of Some Potentially Chemically Peculiar $\delta$ Scuti Stars},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z2D5D2TO}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04761}
}
abstract
Investigating chemically peculiar pulsating stars is crucial for understanding the pulsation driving mechanism in detail. To reveal the true peculiarity properties of stars detailed spectroscopic analysis is essential. Therefore, in this study, we focused on Delta Scuti stars previously identified as chemically peculiar but needed comprehensive updated spectroscopic analysis to uncover the chemical abundance structure of them. We selected ten targets which have public high-resolution spectroscopic and photometric data. Performing spectral analyses, we determined the spectral classification, atmospheric parameters, and detailed chemical abundance distributions of the selected stars. The pulsation properties were also analyzed using TESS data and pulsation modes for the highest amplitude pulsation frequencies were derived. We estimated the masses and ages of the targets using the evolutionary tracks and isochrones. As a result of the study, we show that only three targets exhibit chemical peculiarity: AU Scl and FG Eri as metallic A (Am) stars, and HZ Vel as a $\lambda$ Bootis. However, others were found to be chemically normal stars. This study show us the importance of chemical abundance analysis in the classification of chemical peculiar stars.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Computer Modern (defalt font)
\@bibitem \@bib@author\@prev@author \@set@biblabel \@lbibitem[#1] \@bib@parse#1()\@nil \@set@biblabel \@bib@parse#1(#2)#3\@nil \@bib@author #1 @edef\@bib@year @space#2 \@empty \@set@biblabel#1 \@bib@author\@empty \@latex@warning Author name should be given for reference entry ``#1'' \@bib@year\@empty \@latex@warning Publication year should be given for re...
2025
-
[2]
Abt, H. A., Barnes, R. C., Biggs, E. S., et al.\ 1965, , 142, 1604. doi:10.1086/148440
-
[3]
Abt, H. A. & Levato, H.\ 1978, , 90, 201. doi:10.1086/130308
-
[4]
A., Brodzik, D., & Schaefer, B.\ 1979, , 91, 176
Abt, H. A., Brodzik, D., & Schaefer, B.\ 1979, , 91, 176. doi:10.1086/130467
-
[5]
Abt, H. A. & Willmarth, D. W.\ 1999, , 521, 682. doi:10.1086/307569
-
[6]
Aerts, C., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., & Kurtz, D. W.\ 2010, , Asteroseismology. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5803-5
-
[7]
Alecian, G.\ 2015, , Abundance distributions over the surfaces of magnetic ApBp stars: theoretical predictions, 454, 3, 3143. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2205
-
[8]
doi:10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/118
Antoci, V., Cunha, M., Houdek, G., et al.\ 2014, , The Role of Turbulent Pressure as a Coherent Pulsational Driving Mechanism: The Case of the Scuti Star HD 187547, 796, 2, 118. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/118
Show all 145 references
-
[9]
S., Bowman, D
Antoci, V., Cunha, M. S., Bowman, D. M., et al.\ 2019, , 490, 4040. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2787
2019 doi
-
[10]
J., et al.\ 2009, , 47, 481
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., et al.\ 2009, , 47, 481. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222
2009
-
[11]
A., Ligni \`e res, F., et al.\ 2010, , No detection of large-scale magnetic fields at the surfaces of Am and HgMn stars, 523, A40
Auri \`e re, M., Wade, G. A., Ligni \`e res, F., et al.\ 2010, , No detection of large-scale magnetic fields at the surfaces of Am and HgMn stars, 523, A40. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014848
2010 doi
-
[12]
& Miczaika, G
Bahner, K. & Miczaika, G. R.\ 1952, , 31, 236
1952
-
[13]
A.\ 1977, , 84, 101
Balona, L. A.\ 1977, , 84, 101
1977
-
[15]
R., Murphy, S
Barac, N., Bedding, T. R., Murphy, S. J., et al.\ 2022, , 516, 2080. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2132
2022 doi
-
[16]
Baran, A. S. & Koen, C.\ 2021, Acta Astronomica, 71, 113. doi:10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3
2021 doi
-
[17]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937262
Barcel \'o Forteza, S., Moya, A., Barrado, D., et al.\ 2020, , 638, A59. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937262
2020 doi
-
[18]
& Lazauskaite, R.\ 1997, Baltic Astronomy, 6, 499
Bartkevicius, A. & Lazauskaite, R.\ 1997, Baltic Astronomy, 6, 499. doi:10.1515/astro-1997-0402
1997 doi
-
[19]
R., Murphy, S
Bedding, T. R., Murphy, S. J., Crawford, C., et al.\ 2023, , 946, L10. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc17a
2023 doi
- [20]
-
[21]
Breger, M.\ 1990, Delta Scuti Star Newsletter, p.13-16, Uncertainties in the calculated pulsation constant Q, 2, 13
1990
-
[22]
Breger, M.\ 2000, Delta Scuti and Related Stars, Scuti stars (Review), 210, 3
2000
-
[23]
& Coupry, M
Burkhart, C. & Coupry, M. F.\ 2000, , 354, 216
2000
-
[24]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078523
Bruntt, H., De Cat, P., & Aerts, C.\ 2008, , 478, 487. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078523
2008 doi
-
[25]
Bush, T. C. & Hintz, E. G.\ 2008, , 136, 1061. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/3/1061
2008 doi
-
[26]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038192 pleadies age 7.89
Cantat-Gaudin, T., Anders, F., Castro-Ginard, A., et al.\ 2020, , 640, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038192 pleadies age 7.89
2020 doi
-
[27]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016276
Casagrande, L., Sch \"o nrich, R., Asplund, M., et al.\ 2011, , 530, A138. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016276
2011 doi
-
[28]
H.\ 2004, , 425, 641
Catanzaro, G., Leone, F., & Dall, T. H.\ 2004, , 425, 641. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040558
2004 doi
-
[29]
& Ripepi, V.\ 2014, , 441, 1669
Catanzaro, G. & Ripepi, V.\ 2014, , 441, 1669. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu674
2014 doi
-
[30]
J., Peletier, R
Cenarro, A. J., Peletier, R. F., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez, P., et al.\ 2007, , 374, 664. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11196.x
2007
-
[31]
doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/5/132
Chang, S.-W., Protopapas, P., Kim, D.-W., et al.\ 2013, , 145, 132. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/5/132
2013 doi
-
[32]
Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al.\ 2016, , Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled Models, 823, 2, 102. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102
2016 doi
-
[33]
Conti, P. S. & Strom, S. E.\ 1968, , 152, 483. doi:10.1086/149565
1968 doi
- [34]
-
[35]
N.\ 2000, , Allen's astrophysical quantities
Cox, A. N.\ 2000, , Allen's astrophysical quantities
2000
-
[36]
M., Skrutskie, M
Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al.\ 2003, ``The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky Point Source Catalog, NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive
2003
-
[37]
de Bruijne, J. H. J. & Eilers, A.-C.\ 2012, , 546, A61. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219219
2012 doi
-
[38]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053655
De Cat, P., Eyer, L., Cuypers, J., et al.\ 2006, , 449, 281. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053655
2006 doi
-
[39]
S., Monteiro, H., Moitinho, A., et al.\ 2021, , 504, 1, 356
Dias, W. S., Monteiro, H., Moitinho, A., et al.\ 2021, , 504, 1, 356. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab770
2021 doi
- [40]
-
[41]
H., Matthews, B., Venn, K., et al.\ 2018, , 857, 93
Draper, Z. H., Matthews, B., Venn, K., et al.\ 2018, , 857, 93. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab1fd
2018 doi
-
[42]
W.\ 1997, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4513, 1
Duerbeck, H. W.\ 1997, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4513, 1
1997
-
[43]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349076
D \"u rfeldt-Pedros, O., Antoci, V., Smalley, B., et al.\ 2024, , 690, A104. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349076
2024 doi
- [44]
- [45]
- [46]
- [47]
-
[48]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040216
Faraggiana, R., Bonifacio, P., Caffau, E., et al.\ 2004, , 425, 615. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040216
2004 doi
- [49]
- [50]
-
[51]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011668
Fox-Machado, L., \'A lvarez, M., Michel, E., et al.\ 2002, , 382, 556. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011668
2002 doi
-
[52]
C., et al.\ 2006, , 77, 455
Fox Machado, L., P \'e rez Hern \'a ndez, F., Su \'a rez, J. C., et al.\ 2006, , 77, 455
2006
-
[53]
Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al.\ 2023, , 674, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940
2023 doi
-
[54]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078807
Gebran, M., Monier, R., & Richard, O.\ 2008, , 479, 189. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078807
2008 doi
-
[55]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031472
Gerbaldi, M., Faraggiana, R., & Lai, O.\ 2003, , 412, 447. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031472
2003 doi
-
[56]
A.\ 2018, , 480, 2953
Ghazaryan, S., Alecian, G., & Hakobyan, A. A.\ 2018, , 480, 2953. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1912
2018 doi
-
[57]
Graham, J. A. & Slettebak, A.\ 1973, , 78, 295. doi:10.1086/111416
1973 doi
-
[58]
Gray, R. O. & Corbally, C.\ 2009, Stellar Spectral Classification by Richard O. Gray and Christopher J. Corbally. Princeton University Press, 2009. ISBN: \^A 978-0-691-12511-4
2009
-
[59]
M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., et al.\ 2019, , 887, 93
Green, G. M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., et al.\ 2019, , 887, 93. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362
2019 doi
-
[60]
doi:10.1051/aas:1999186
Grenier, S., Burnage, R., Faraggiana, R., et al.\ 1999, , 135, 503. doi:10.1051/aas:1999186
1999 doi
-
[61]
Gontcharov, G. A. & Mosenkov, A. V.\ 2019, , 483, 299. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2978
2019 doi
-
[63]
Hauck, B.\ 1986, , 155, 371
1986
-
[64]
Heck, A., Albert, A., Delays, D., et al.\ 1977, , 61, 563
1977
-
[65]
V., et al.\ 2000, , 355, L27
H g, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al.\ 2000, , 355, L27
2000
-
[66]
& Cowley, A
Houk, N. & Cowley, A. P.\ 1975, University of Michigan Catalogue of two-dimensional spectral types for the HD stars. Volume I. Declinations -90\_ to -53\_ 0., by Houk, N.; Cowley, A. P.. Ann Arbor, MI (USA): Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 19 + 452 p
1975
-
[67]
Volume\_3
Houk, N.\ 1982, Michigan Catalogue of Two-dimensional Spectral Types for the HD stars. Volume\_3. Declinations -40\_ 0 to -26\_ 0., by Houk, N.. Ann Arbor, MI(USA): Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 12 + 390 p
1982
-
[68]
Hui-Bon-Hoa, A., Burkhart, C., & Alecian, G.\ 1997, , 323, 901
1997
-
[69]
Johnson, H. L. & Knuckles, C. F.\ 1955, , 122, 209. doi:10.1086/146079
1955 doi
-
[70]
doi:10.1093/mnras/stw393
Kahraman Ali c avu s , F., Niemczura, E., De Cat, P., et al.\ 2016, , 458, 2307. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw393
2016 doi
-
[71]
u m \"u s , D., K rm z ta s , \
Kahraman Ali c avu s , F., G \"u m \"u s , D., K rm z ta s , \"O ., et al.\ 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 085003. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac71a4
2022 doi
-
[73]
B., Handler, G., Krisciunas, K., et al.\ 1999, , 111, 840
Kaye, A. B., Handler, G., Krisciunas, K., et al.\ 1999, , 111, 840. doi:10.1086/316399
1999 doi
-
[74]
doi:10.1093/mnras/277.1.217
Koen, C., Kilkenny, D., van Wyk, F., et al.\ 1995, , 277, 217. doi:10.1093/mnras/277.1.217
1995 doi
-
[75]
doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02928.x
Koen, C., van Rooyen, R., van Wyk, F., et al.\ 1999, , 309, 1051. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02928.x
1999
-
[76]
W.\ 1976, , Metallicism and pulsation: an analysis of the Delta Delphini stars., 32, 651
Kurtz, D. W.\ 1976, , Metallicism and pulsation: an analysis of the Delta Delphini stars., 32, 651. doi:10.1086/190411
1976 doi
- [77]
- [78]
-
[79]
Kurucz, R. L. & Avrett, E. H.\ 1981, SAO Special Report, 391
1981
-
[80]
Kurucz, R.\ 1993, Robert Kurucz CD-ROM, 13
1993
- [81]
-
[82]
& Breger, M.\ 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53
Lenz, P. & Breger, M.\ 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53. doi:10.1553/cia146s53
2005 doi
- [83]
-
[84]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054021
Masana, E., Jordi, C., & Ribas, I.\ 2006, , 450, 735. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054021
2006 doi
-
[85]
Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al.\ 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20
2003
-
[86]
N., Mamajek, E
Mellon, S. N., Mamajek, E. E., Stuik, R., et al.\ 2019, , 244, 15. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab3662
2019 doi
-
[87]
& Heck, A.\ 1980, , 85, 93
Mersch, G. & Heck, A.\ 1980, , 85, 93
1980
-
[88]
Milone, A. D. C., Sansom, A. E., & S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez, P.\ 2011, , 414, 1227. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18457.x
2011
-
[89]
& Richard, O.\ 2004, The A-Star Puzzle, 224, 209
Monier, R. & Richard, O.\ 2004, The A-Star Puzzle, 224, 209. doi:10.1017/S1743921304004570
2004 doi
-
[90]
Moon, T. T. & Dworetsky, M. M.\ 1985, , 217, 305. doi:10.1093/mnras/217.2.305
1985 doi
- [91]
-
[92]
A., Mathieu, R
Morse, J. A., Mathieu, R. D., & Levine, S. E.\ 1991, , 101, 1495. doi:10.1086/115782
1991 doi
-
[93]
A., Prugniel, P., et al.\ 2004, , 116, 693
Moultaka, J., Ilovaisky, S. A., Prugniel, P., et al.\ 2004, , 116, 693. doi:10.1086/422177
2004 doi
-
[94]
Murphy, S. J. & Paunzen, E.\ 2017, , 466, 546. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3141
2017 doi
-
[95]
J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., et al.\ 2019, , 485, 2380
Murphy, S. J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., et al.\ 2019, , 485, 2380. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz590
2019 doi
-
[96]
J., Paunzen, E., Bedding, T
Murphy, S. J., Paunzen, E., Bedding, T. R., et al.\ 2020, , 495, 1888. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1271
2020 doi
-
[97]
J., Saio, H., Takada-Hidai, M., et al.\ 2020, , 498, 3, 4272
Murphy, S. J., Saio, H., Takada-Hidai, M., et al.\ 2020, , 498, 3, 4272. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2667
2020 doi
-
[98]
Niemczura et al
Niemczura, E., Smalley, B., & Pych, W.\ 2014, Determination of Atmopsheric Parameters of B-, A-, F- and G-Type Stars Lectures from the School of Spectroscopic Data Analyses, edited by E. Niemczura et al. ISBN 978-3-319-06955-5. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2014
2014
-
[99]
J., et al.\ 2017, , Spectroscopic survey of Kepler stars - II
Niemczura, E., Poli \'n ska, M., Murphy, S. J., et al.\ 2017, , Spectroscopic survey of Kepler stars - II. FIES/NOT observations of A- and F-type stars, 470, 3, 2870. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1256
2017 doi
-
[100]
Olivares, J., Lodieu, N., B \'e jar, V. J. S., et al.\ 2023, , 675, A28. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244703
2023 doi
-
[101]
M., Hogg, D
Oh, S., Price-Whelan, A. M., Hogg, D. W., et al.\ 2017, , 153, 257. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa6ffd
2017 doi
-
[102]
& Duffee, B.\ 1996, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4297, 1
Paunzen, E. & Duffee, B.\ 1996, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 4297, 1
1996
-
[103]
W., Heiter, U., et al.\ 1997, , 123, 93
Paunzen, E., Weiss, W. W., Heiter, U., et al.\ 1997, , 123, 93. doi:10.1051/aas:1997308
1997 doi
- [104]
-
[105]
W., Kuschnig, R., et al.\ 1998, , 335, 533
Paunzen, E., Weiss, W. W., Kuschnig, R., et al.\ 1998, , 335, 533
1998
-
[106]
K., et al.\ 1999, , 345, 597
Paunzen, E., Kamp, I., Iliev, I. K., et al.\ 1999, , 345, 597
1999
-
[107]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010630
Paunzen, E., Duffee, B., Heiter, U., et al.\ 2001, , 373, 625. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010630
2001 doi
-
[108]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010631
Paunzen, E.\ 2001, , 373, 633. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010631
2001 doi
-
[109]
K., Kamp, I., et al.\ 2002, , 336, 1030
Paunzen, E., Iliev, I. K., Kamp, I., et al.\ 2002, , 336, 1030. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05865.x
2002
-
[110]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526413
Paunzen, E.\ 2015, , 580, A23. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526413
2015 doi
-
[111]
doi:10.1017/S1743921323003538
Paunzen, E.\ 2024, IAU Symposium, 376, 91. doi:10.1017/S1743921323003538
2024 doi
-
[112]
Pearce, J. A. & Hill, G.\ 1975, Publications of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory Victoria, 14, 319
1975
-
[113]
& Thomsen, B.\ 1977, , 30, 11
Pedersen, H. & Thomsen, B.\ 1977, , 30, 11
1977
-
[114]
doi:10.1117/12.787379
Perruchot, S., Kohler, D., Bouchy, F., et al.\ 2008, , 7014, 70140J. doi:10.1117/12.787379
2008 doi
- [115]
-
[116]
Perry, C. L. & Christodoulou, D. M.\ 1996, , 108, 772. doi:10.1086/133800
1996 doi
-
[117]
W.\ 1974, , 12, 257
Preston, G. W.\ 1974, , 12, 257. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.12.090174.001353
1974
-
[118]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116769
Prugniel, P., Vauglin, I., & Koleva, M.\ 2011, , 531, A165. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116769
2011 doi
-
[119]
doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac12dc
Poro, A., Paki, E., Mazhari, G., et al.\ 2021, , 133, 084201. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac12dc
2021 doi
-
[120]
J., Harzandjadidi, R., et al.\ 2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Period Luminosity Relationship for Scuti Stars Revisited, 24, 2, 025011
Poro, A., Jafarzadeh, S. J., Harzandjadidi, R., et al.\ 2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Period Luminosity Relationship for Scuti Stars Revisited, 24, 2, 025011. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ad1b0f
2024 doi
- [121]
-
[122]
doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/207
Rainer, M., Poretti, E., Mist \`o , A., et al.\ 2016, , 152, 207. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/207
2016 doi
-
[123]
Randich, S., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., & Prosser, C.\ 1996, , 313, 815
1996
-
[124]
& Manfroid, J.\ 2009, , 498, 961
Renson, P. & Manfroid, J.\ 2009, , 498, 961. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810788
2009 doi
-
[125]
R., Winn, J
Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al.\ 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003
2015 doi
-
[126]
Rodriguez, E., Lopez de Coca, P., Rolland, A., et al.\ 1994, , 106, 21
1994
-
[127]
J., & L \'o pez de Coca, P.\ 2000, , 144, 469
Rodr \' guez, E., L \'o pez-Gonz \'a lez, M. J., & L \'o pez de Coca, P.\ 2000, , 144, 469. doi:10.1051/aas:2000221
2000 doi
-
[128]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020943
Royer, F., Grenier, S., Baylac, M.-O., et al.\ 2002, , 393, 897. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020943
2002 doi
-
[129]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346847
Royer, P., Merle, T., Dsilva, K., et al.\ 2024, , 681, A107. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346847
2024 doi
-
[130]
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141480
R \'o \.z a \'n ski, T., Niemczura, E., Lemiesz, J., et al.\ 2022, , 659, A199. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141480
2022 doi
- [131]
-
[132]
& Fukugita, M.\ 2000, , 120, 1072
Sekiguchi, M. & Fukugita, M.\ 2000, , 120, 1072. doi:10.1086/301490
2000 doi
-
[133]
& Landstreet, J
Silaj, J. & Landstreet, J. D.\ 2014, , 566, A132. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321468
2014 doi
-
[134]
& Stock, J.\ 1959, Astronomische Abhandlungen der Hamburger Sternwarte, 5, 105
Slettebak, A. & Stock, J.\ 1959, Astronomische Abhandlungen der Hamburger Sternwarte, 5, 105
1959
-
[135]
W., Smith, A
Smalley, B., Kurtz, D. W., Smith, A. M. S., et al.\ 2011, , 535, A3. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117230
2011 doi
-
[136]
L., et al.\ 2017, , Pulsation versus metallicism in Am stars as revealed by LAMOST and WASP, 465, 3, 2662
Smalley, B., Antoci, V., Holdsworth, D. L., et al.\ 2017, , Pulsation versus metallicism in Am stars as revealed by LAMOST and WASP, 465, 3, 2662. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2903
2017 doi
-
[137]
R., Caillault, J.-P., Gagne, M., et al.\ 1994, , 91, 625
Stauffer, J. R., Caillault, J.-P., Gagne, M., et al.\ 1994, , 91, 625. doi:10.1086/191951
1994 doi
- [138]
-
[139]
R., Huber, D., et al.\ 2022, , 927, 1, 31
Tayar, J., Claytor, Z. R., Huber, D., et al.\ 2022, , 927, 1, 31. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4bbc
2022 doi
-
[140]
S.\ 2005, , 443, 627
Th \'e ado, S., Vauclair, S., & Cunha, M. S.\ 2005, , 443, 627. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052933
2005 doi
-
[141]
doi:10.1117/12.968154
Tody, D.\ 1986, , The IRAF Data Reduction and Analysis System, 627, 733. doi:10.1117/12.968154
1986 doi
-
[142]
G.\ 1982, , 26, 666
Tsvetkov, T. G.\ 1982, , 26, 666
1982
- [143]
- [144]
-
[145]
Uytterhoeven, K., Moya, A., Grigahc \`e ne, A., et al.\ 2011, , The Kepler characterization of the variability among A- and F-type stars. I. General overview, 534, A125. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117368
2011 doi
-
[146]
Xu, Y., Li, Z.-P., Deng, L.-C., et al.\ 2002, Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys., 2, 441. doi:10.1088/1009-9271/2/5/441
2002 doi
-
[147]
J., Smalley, B., et al.\ 1994, , 267, 1045
Wonnacott, D., Kellett, B. J., Smalley, B., et al.\ 1994, , 267, 1045. doi:10.1093/mnras/267.4.1045
1994 doi
- [148]
Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.